We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Similar documents
We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

CHAPTER 10 RELIABILITY

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Reliability and Availability Simulation. Krige Visser, Professor, University of Pretoria, South Africa

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Concept of Reliability

F O R SOCI AL WORK RESE ARCH

Availability. M(t) = 1 - e -mt

Dependable Systems. ! Dependability Attributes. Dr. Peter Tröger. Sources:

Reliability of fluid systems

Signal Handling & Processing

9. Reliability theory

Terminology and Concepts

We are IntechOpen, the first native scientific publisher of Open Access books. International authors and editors. Our authors are among the TOP 1%

Chapter 2. Planning Criteria. Turaj Amraee. Fall 2012 K.N.Toosi University of Technology

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Reliability Engineering I

Cyber Physical Power Systems Power in Communications

SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER

Reliable Computing I

EE 445 / 850: Final Examination

Failure rate in the continuous sense. Figure. Exponential failure density functions [f(t)] 1

Markov Reliability and Availability Analysis. Markov Processes

Practical Applications of Reliability Theory

Key Words: Lifetime Data Analysis (LDA), Probability Density Function (PDF), Goodness of fit methods, Chi-square method.

Fundamentals of Reliability Engineering and Applications

Engineering Risk Benefit Analysis

Implementation of Weibull s Model for Determination of Aircraft s Parts Reliability and Spare Parts Forecast

Evaluation criteria for reliability in computer systems

Chapter 5. System Reliability and Reliability Prediction.

Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems 5.1 Reliability Quantification with RBDs

Importance of the Running-In Phase on the Life of Repairable Systems

Single-part-type, multiple stage systems. Lecturer: Stanley B. Gershwin

Dependable Computer Systems

Modeling and Simulation of Communication Systems and Networks Chapter 1. Reliability

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

SPARE PARTS STOCK LEVEL CALCULATION

T i t l e o f t h e w o r k : L a M a r e a Y o k o h a m a. A r t i s t : M a r i a n o P e n s o t t i ( P l a y w r i g h t, D i r e c t o r )

57:022 Principles of Design II Final Exam Solutions - Spring 1997

Reliability and Economic Analysis of a Power Generating System Comprising One Gas and One Steam Turbine with Random Inspection

Chapter 15. System Reliability Concepts and Methods. William Q. Meeker and Luis A. Escobar Iowa State University and Louisiana State University

Fault Tolerance. Dealing with Faults

Quantitative evaluation of Dependability

Fleet Maintenance Simulation With Insufficient Data

Real-time Systems: Scheduling Periodic Tasks

A STUDY OF ASYMPTOTIC AVAILABILITY MODELING FOR A FAILURE AND A REPAIR RATES FOLLOWING A WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION

P R O G N O S T I C S

Networks of Queues Models with Several. Classes of Customers and Exponential. Service Times

Fault-Tolerant Computing

0utline. 1. Tools from Operations Research. 2. Applications

Analysis Of System Reliability Using Markov Technique

SIMULATION OF FTA IN SIMULINK. Alexej Chovanec

Chapter 6. a. Open Circuit. Only if both resistors fail open-circuit, i.e. they are in parallel.

Non-observable failure progression

EIE/ENE 104 Electric Circuit Theory

ESTIMATION OF RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF POWER OIL TRANSFORMERS

Chapter 9 Part II Maintainability

UNAVAILABILITY CALCULATIONS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF COMPUTER ACCURACY ABSTRACT

System Reliability Analysis. CS6323 Networks and Systems

Tradeoff between Reliability and Power Management

Part 3: Fault-tolerance and Modeling

Open Access. Suman Chakraborty* Q T + S gen = 1 S 1 S 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur , India

Q Scheme Marks AOs. Notes. Ignore any extra columns with 0 probability. Otherwise 1 for each. If 4, 5 or 6 missing B0B0.

PROBLEM 8.3. S F = 0: N -(250 lb)cos 30 -(50 lb)sin 30 = SOLUTION

Probabilistic production cost simulation. EG2200 Lectures 12 14, autumn 2015 Mikael Amelin

A note on the Lipkin model in arbitrary fermion number

Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems Chapter 9. Average frequency of dangerous failures

MIT Manufacturing Systems Analysis Lectures 6 9: Flow Lines

of an algorithm for automated cause-consequence diagram construction.

Hazard Function, Failure Rate, and A Rule of Thumb for Calculating Empirical Hazard Function of Continuous-Time Failure Data

The Stick-Slip Vibration and Bifurcation of a Vibro-Impact System with Dry Friction

A General Bayes Weibull Inference Model for Accelerated Life Testing

At Terms and Definitions


DESIGN OF PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING MODEL FOR DETERIORATING SYSTEMS

Quantitative evaluation of Dependability

Reliability evaluation of a repairable system under fuzziness

Links Failure Analysis of Averaging Executed by. Protocol Push sum

CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Open Access A New Optimization Algorithm for Checking and Sorting Project Schedules

1 DIFFERENTIATION OF VECTORS

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering. Fault Tolerant Computing ECE 655

B.H. Far

YORK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS MATH , YEAR APPLIED OPTIMIZATION (TEST #4 ) (SOLUTIONS)

Maintenance free operating period an alternative measure to MTBF and failure rate for specifying reliability?

The k-fractional Logistic Equation with k-caputo Derivative

Discussion 03 Solutions

Chapter 4 Availability Analysis by Simulation and Markov Chain

TL 9000 Quality Management System. Measurements Handbook. SQ Examples

Aviation Infrastructure Economics

Analysis on Current Limiting Characteristics of Transformer Type SFCL with Additionally Coupled Circuit

Chapter 8. Calculation of PFD using Markov

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL DETERMINATION OF ON-TIME PERFORMANCE WITHIN MEASUREMENT OF THE TRANSIT TIME FOR SINGLE PIECE PRIORITY MAIL

Ways to make neural networks generalize better

An Integral Measure of Aging/Rejuvenation for Repairable and Non-repairable Systems

Topic - 12 Linear Regression and Correlation

Limits and Continuity. 2 lim. x x x 3. lim x. lim. sinq. 5. Find the horizontal asymptote (s) of. Summer Packet AP Calculus BC Page 4

Level 1 Exam Appalachian State University

Transcription:

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 3,500 108,000 1.7 M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our authors are among the 151 Countries delivered to TOP 1% most cited scientists 12.2% Contributors from top 500 universities Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index in Web of Science Core Collection (BKCI) Interested in publishing with us? Contact book.department@intechopen.com Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected. For more information visit www.intechopen.com

Chapter 3 Characteristics of Reliability Jaroslav Menčík Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/62356 Abstract The basic reliability characteristics are explained: time to failure, probability of failure and of failure-free operation, repairable and unrepairable objects. Mean time to repair and between repairs, coefficient of availability and unavailability, failure rate. Examples for better understanding are included. Keywords: Time to failure, mean time to failure, mean time between failures, mean time to repair, availability, unavailability, failure rate Reliability is usually characterized by the probability of failure or by the time to failure. If failure is considered as a single event (e.g. collapse of a bridge), regardless of the time, only its probability is of interest. If we want to know when the failures can occur, their time characteristics are also important. In this chapter, time-dependent failures will be dealt with. Here, one must distinguish between unrepaired and repaired objects depending on whether the failed object is discarded or repaired and again put into service. 1. Unrepaired objects The basic quantity for unrepaired objects is the time to failure t f. If a group of identical objects is put into operation, the individual pieces begin to fail after some time, and it is also possible to express the number of failed pieces as a function of time, n f (t). more universal quantity is the relative proportion of the failed items, that is, the number of the failed items related to the number n of monitored objects, n f (t)/n. This ratio approximately expresses the probability of failure F(t) during the time interval <0; t>; 2016 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

20 Concise Reliability for Engineers t F( t) = ò f ( t) dt» n ( t) f n (1) 0 Function F(t) is the distribution function of the time to failure, also called failure function (Fig. 1a). n aid for easier remembering: the letter F is also the first letter of the word failure. 1,0 F R 0,5 F(t) R(t) 0,0 0 t 10 Figure 1. (a) Failure function F(t) and (b) reliability function R(t). The probability of failure-free operation R(t) expresses the probability that no failure occurs before the time t; R( t) = ò f ( t) dt» én n ( t) ù ë - n f û (2) t R(t) shows the gradual loss of serviceable objects (Fig. 1b) and is called reliability function (therefore the symbol R). R is complementary to F, R( t) + F ( t) = 1. R = 1 F, F = 1 R. (3) The probability density of the time to failure, f(t), expresses the probability of failure during a very short time interval t at time t, related to this interval: df( t) n ( t + Dt) - n t f f f ( t) =» ; dt ndt (4) the unit is s -1 or h -1. The right-hand side of Equation (4) indicates how the probability density can be determined from empirical data, n f (t + t) expresses the number of failed parts from 0

Characteristics of Reliability http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/62356 21 to t + t, and n f (t) is the number of failures that occurred until the time t. In fact, probability density f(t) shows the distribution of failures in time, similar to Fig. 3a in Chapter 2. Useful information on reliability is obtained from a very simple characteristic, the average or mean time to failure or MTTF, which is generally defined as MTTF = t = t = t f ( t) dt = R( t) dt. mean ò ò (5) 0 0 The mean time to failure can be calculated from operational records as the average of the group of measured times to failure, ( ), MTTF = 1 / n å t f j. (6) Remark: Equation (6) is appropriate if all objects have failed. If components with very long life are tested, the tests are usually terminated after some predefined time or after failure of certain fraction of all components. In such cases, modified formulas for MTTF must be used; see Chapter 20 or [1]. 2. Repaired objects If a repairable item fails, it is repaired and again put into operation. fter the next failure, it is again repaired and put into operation, etc. One can thus speak of a flow of operations and repairs (Fig. 2). If we denote each interval as uptime t up or downtime t down, we can calculate the mean time between failures, MTBF, and the mean time to repair, MTTR: ( ), MTBF = 1 / n å t up j, (7) ( ), MTTR = 1 / n å t down j. (8) If data for a high number of values t up and t down are available, the distribution of these times can also be obtained and used. t up,1 t up,2 t up,3 t up,4 t up,5 0 t down,1 t d,2 t d,3 t d,4 Figure 2. Flow of operations (uptimes, t up ) and repairs (downtimes, t d ).

22 Concise Reliability for Engineers The mean time between failures and mean time to repair can be used to characterize the probability that the object will be serviceable at a certain instant or not. The coefficient of availability, COA, is defined as [2, 3]: ( ) COA = å t / t = åt / å t + å t, (9) up tot up up down where t up is the sum of times of operation during the investigated interval (e.g. 1 month or year), t down is the sum of down times in this interval, and t tot is the total investigated time. The coefficient of availability can also be calculated as ( ) COA = MTBF / MTBF + MTTR ; (10) MTBF is the mean time (of operation) between failures and MTTR is the mean time to repair (generally, the mean down time caused by failures). The coefficient of availability simply says what part of the total time is available for useful work. It also expresses the average probability that the object will be able to fulfill the expected task at any instant. The complementary quantity, coefficient of unavailability, ( ) ( ) COU = åt / å t + å t = MTTR / MTBF + MTTR = 1 COA, (11) down up down says how many percent of the total time are downtimes. It also expresses the probability that the object will not be able to perform its function at a demanded instant. For example, COA = 0.9 means that, on average, the vehicle (or machine) is only 90% of all time in operation, and 10% of the total time it is idle due to failures. In other words, there is a 90% probability that the object will be available when needed and a 10% probability that it will not be available. Even the simple records from operation can give the basic values of probabilities and reliability. It must reminded here that the time of a repair is not always the same as the downtime when the object (e.g. a machine) does not work. In addition to the net time of the repair, some logistic times are often necessary, which sometimes last much longer than the repair. 3. Failure rate very important reliability characteristic is failure rate λ(t). asically, failure rate expresses the probability of failure during a time unit. Unlike probability, which is nondimensional, failure rate has a dimension. It is t -1, for example, h -1 or % per hour for machines, components, or appliances, km -1 for vehicles, etc. Two cases must be distinguished, depending on whether the object after failure is repaired or not.

Characteristics of Reliability http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/62356 23 Unrepaired objects The failed item is discarded. This is typical of simple unrepairable objects, such as lamp bulbs, screws, windows, integrated circuits, and many inexpensive parts. lso, a living being cannot be repaired, if it has died. Some objects could be repaired after failure but are not, because of economic reasons. Thus, the term nonrepaired objects can be used as more universal. Failure rate expresses the probability of failure during a time unit but is related only to those objects that have remained in operation until the time t, that is, those that have not failed before the time t. Failure rate is defined as ( t) f ( t) R( t) l = / ; (12) f(t) is the probability density of failure (=df/dt), and R(t) is the probability that the object was operated until the time t. n illustrative idea of failure rate can be gained from a simple formula for its calculation from the data from operation: { } ( ) = ( + D ) ( ) ( ( ) l t én t t n t ù / é n n t ù ë t ; f f û ë f û D (13) n is the total number of the monitored objects, n f (t) is the number of the objects failed until the time t, [n f (t + t) n f (t)] is the number of objects failed during the time from t to t + t, and t is a short time interval. [Remark: Formula (13) is only approximate and often exhibits big scatter. more accurate value of the instantaneous failure rate λ(t) can be obtained from several n f values occurring in a wider interval around the time t.] The fraction of failed objects, F(t), increases with time, and the fraction of objects that have not failed, R(t), decreases. Equation (1) relates mutually three variables: λ, f, and R. Fortunately, it can be transformed into simple relationships of two quantities. First, it can be rewritten as follows: ( t) f ( t) R( t) édf ( t) dtù R( t) édr( t) dtù R( t) l = / = ë / û / = ë / û /. (14) The separation of the variables leads to the differential equation of first order, ( t) dt dr( t) R( t) l = /. (15) The integration and transformation lead to the following expression for the probability of operation as a function of time: t æ ö R( t) = exp - l( t) dt. ç ò (16) è 0 ø

24 Concise Reliability for Engineers The probability of failure is ( ) R( t) F t = 1. (17) With respect to Equations (12) to (17), any of the four quantities f, F, R, and λ is sufficient for the determination of any of the remaining three quantities. The mean time to failure can be calculated using Equation (5). Repaired objects fter a failure, the object is repaired and continues working. In complex systems, the failed part can also be replaced by a good one to reduce the downtime. The number of working objects remains constant, so that R(t) = 1. Failure rate (1) thus corresponds to the failure probability density, λ(t) = f(t). In this case, the term hazard rate is used as more appropriate, but the expression failure rate is also very common. Example 1 The monitoring of operation and repairs of a certain machine has given the following durations of operations and repairs: t up,1 = 28 h, t down,1 = 3 h, t up,2 = 16 h, t down,2 = 2 h, t up,3 = 20 h, t down,3 = 1 h, t up,4 = 10 h, t down,4 = 3 h, t up,5 = 30 h, and t down,5 = 2 h. Tasks. 1. Determine the mean time between failures and mean time to repair. 2. Determine the coefficient of availability (COA) and unavailability (COU). 3. Express the average probability (in %) that the machine (a) will be able to work at any instant (R) and (b) will not be able to work (F). Solution 1. Mean time between failures MTBF = t up,j /n = (28 + 16 + 20 + 10 + 30)/5 = 104/5 = 20.8 h. Mean time to repair MTTR = t down,j /n = (3 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 2)/5 = 11/5 = 2.2 h. 2. Coefficient of availability COA = t up,j /t tot = t up,j /( t up,j + t down,j ) = 104/(104 + 11) = 0.90435. Coefficient of unavailability: COU = t down,j /t tot = 11/(104 + 11) = 0.09565. nother way of calculation: COA = MTBF/(MTBF + MTTR) = 20.8/(20.8 + 2.2) = 0.90435 and COU = MTTR/(MTBF + MTTR) = 2.2/(20.8 + 2.2) = 0.09565. 3. The probability that the machine will be able to work at any instant equals the coefficient of availability; R = COA = 0.90435 90,4%. Similarly, F = COU = 0.09565 9.6%. Example 2 In a town, N = 30 buses are necessary for assuring reliable traffic on 15 routes. However, due to failures and maintenance, several buses are unavailable every day. s it follows from long-

Characteristics of Reliability http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/62356 25 term records, the mean availability of the buses is COA = 0.85. How many reserve buses (N r ) are necessary? What is the total necessary number of buses N tot? Solution The coefficient of availability can be calculated as the number of operable buses, N up, divided by the total number of vehicles, COA = N up /N tot, from which N tot = N up /COA. With the above numbers, N tot = 30/0.85 = 35.29. To reliably ensure the public traffic, 36 buses are thus necessary. The number of reserve vehicles is 36 30 = 6 buses. Author details Jaroslav Menčík ddress all correspondence to: jaroslav.mencik@upce.cz Department of Mechanics, Materials and Machine Parts, Jan Perner Transport Faculty, University of Pardubice, Czech Republic References [1] ednařík J et al. Reliability techniques in electronic practice (In Czech: Technika spolehlivosti v elektronické praxi). Praha: SNTL; 1990. 336 p. [2] entley J P. Introduction to Reliability and Quality Engineering. Harlow, England: ddison-wesley; 1999. 202 p. [3] Ireson W G, Coombs C F Jr, Moss R Y. Handbook of reliability engineering and management. 2 nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996. 816 p.