Signalized Intersections

Similar documents
CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design

CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Design Priciples of Traffic Signal

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

Traffic signal design-ii

Signalized Intersection Delay Models

CHAPTER 2. CAPACITY OF TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS

1 h. Page 1 of 12 FINAL EXAM FORMULAS. Stopping Sight Distance. (2 ) N st U Where N=sample size s=standard deviation t=z value for confidence level

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Signalized Intersection Delay Models

Traffic Signal Timing: Green Time. CVEN 457 & 696 Lecture #18 Gene Hawkins

CHAPTER 5 DELAY ESTIMATION FOR OVERSATURATED SIGNALIZED APPROACHES

The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study

Signalized Intersection Delay Models

Impact of Day-to-Day Variability of Peak Hour Volumes on Signalized Intersection Performance

MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

Signalized Intersection Delay Models

S.170 th Street Micro-Simulation Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning

LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For

Roundabout Level of Service

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review

Appendix B.1 EMME Model Calibration Memo

Approved Corrections and Changes for the Highway Capacity Manual 2000

A Delay Model for Exclusive Right-turn Lanes at Signalized Intersections with Uniform Arrivals and Right Turns on Red

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

Traffic Impact Study

Control Delay at Signalized Diamond Interchanges Considering Internal Queue Spillback Paper No

FARM 1065 PORTION 1, ATLANTIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Chapter 5 Traffic Flow Characteristics

US 169/I-70 North Loop Planning & Environmental Linkages Study

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015

Appendix I: Traffic Study

$QDO\]LQJ$UWHULDO6WUHHWVLQ1HDU&DSDFLW\ RU2YHUIORZ&RQGLWLRQV

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY WHEELER STREET CLOSURE

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SOUTH BAY SALT POND RESTORATION PROJECT PHASE 2

DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY

Analytical Delay Models for Signalized Intersections

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT

Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5

From LOS to VMT, VHT and Beyond Through Data Fusion: Application to Integrate Corridor Management

APPENDIX. Sutter Street Bicycle Lanes Stockton, CA January 2010

Per your request and authorization, we have prepared this traffic evaluation for the above referenced project.

Appendix C Traffic Study

>

11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas Sponsoring Agency Code College Station, TX

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents

h CIVIL ENGINEERING FLUID MECHANICS section. ± G = percent grade divided by 100 (uphill grade "+")

CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors]

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission

Performance Analysis of Delay Estimation Models for Signalized Intersection Networks

Incorporating the Effects of Traffic Signal Progression Into the Proposed Incremental Queue Accumulation (IQA) Method

March Grade Crossing Analysis

A Study of Red Light Cameras in Kansas City, MO

Airline Road: is a two lane residential roadway adjacent to the west side of the proposed school site with a speed limit of 30 mph.

Traffic Flow Theory & Simulation

Critchfield Rd / SR-129

Traffic Flow Theory and Simulation

Derivation of the Yellow Change Interval Formula

Real-time, Adaptive Prediction of Incident Delay for Advanced Traffic Management Systems

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES

Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project

Progression Factors in the HCM 2000 Queue and Delay Models for Traffic Signals

FINAL REPORT. City of Toronto. Contract Project No: B

Potential Issues with Advance Preemption. Roelof Engelbrecht Texas Transportation Institute

Course Outline Introduction to Transportation Highway Users and their Performance Geometric Design Pavement Design

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672

2.2t t 3 =1.2t+0.035' t= D, = f ? t 3 dt f ' 2 dt

1.225 Transportation Flow Systems Quiz (December 17, 2001; Duration: 3 hours)

Assignment 4:Rail Analysis and Stopping/Passing Distances

OVERVIEW OF A SIMULATION STUDY OF THE HIGHWAY 401 FTMS

Cumulative Count Curve and Queueing Analysis

Traffic Impact Analysis. for the STARBUCKS STORE. Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD. Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES. January 2017.

6711 LEE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA

Derivation of the Yellow Change Interval Formula

FUNDAMENTALS OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING By Jon D. Fricker and Robert K. Whitford

Prepared for. 3D/International, Inc West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas November 2006

Traffic Modelling for Moving-Block Train Control System

MAT SYS 5120 (Winter 2012) Assignment 5 (not to be submitted) There are 4 questions.

Traffic Progression Models

North Carolina s First Quadrant Left: History and Lessons Learned

Traffic flow theory involves the development of mathematical relationships among

Effects of Parameter Distributions and Correlations on Uncertainty Analysis of HCM Delay Model for Signalized Intersections

Vehicle Motion Equations:

Real Time Traffic Control to Optimize Waiting Time of Vehicles at A Road Intersection

Appendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes

North Carolina s First Quadrant Left: History and Lessons Learned

Analytical investigation on the minimum traffic delay at a two-phase. intersection considering the dynamical evolution process of queues

Bounded Delay for Weighted Round Robin with Burst Crediting

Long-Term Evaluation of the Operational Performance of Fixed Time Ramp Metering Control Strategy: A Freeway Corridor Study

Homework 1 - SOLUTION

STUDY OF CRITICAL GAP AND ITS EFFECT ON ENTRY CAPACITY OF A ROUNDABOUT IN MIXED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

CONDITIONAL CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL FOR TWO-WAY ARTERIALS IN OVERSATURATED CONDITIONS PING WANG A DISSERTATION

ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL IV

Transcription:

Signalized Intersections Kelly Pitera October 23, 2009

Topics to be Covered Introduction/Definitions D/D/1 Queueing Phasing and Timing Plan Level of Service (LOS)

Signal Optimization Conflicting Operational Objectives What should be optimized? minimize vehicle delay minimize vehicle stops minimize lost time maximize major street green time maximize pedestrian service minimize accidents/severity

Traffic Signal Phasing & Timing Plan 1. Select signal phasing 2. Establish analysis lane groups 3. Calculate analysis flow rates and adjusted saturation flow rates 4. Determine critical lane groups and total cycle lost time 5. Calculate cycle length 6. Allocate green time 7. Calculate change and clearance intervals 8. Check pedestrian crossing time

1. Select Signal Phasing A cycle is made up of phases Most basic: Two-phase signal: Phase 1 Phase 2 N Same street configuration but as a three-phase signal Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 In this class, number of phases will be given to you

EXAMPLE An intersection operates using a simple 3-phase design as pictured. SB WB EB Phase Lane Saturation Flows group 1 SB 3400 veh/hr 2 NB 3400 veh/hr 3 EB 1400 veh/hr WB 1400 veh/hr NB

2. Establish Analysis Lane Groups Lane Group: A set of lanes established at an intersection approach for separate analysis Guidelines for establishing lane groups Movements made simultaneously from the same lane must be treated as a lane group If an exclusive turn lane (or lanes) is present, it is usually treated as a separate lane group If a lane (or lanes) with shared movements exists in a multiple lane approach, it must first be determined whether it really serves multiple movements or whether it is a de facto lane for one of the movements

2. Establish Analysis Lane Groups (Figure 7.12 in text)

EXAMPLE An intersection operates using a simple 3-phase design as pictured. SB WB EB Phase Lane Saturation Flows group 1 SB 3400 veh/hr 2 NB 3400 veh/hr 3 EB 1400 veh/hr WB 1400 veh/hr NB

3. Calculate Analysis Flow Rates and Adjusted Saturation Flow Rates Need to account for the peak 15-minute flow within an hour (calculate PHF) Similar to analysis of uninterrupted flow (chapter 6) For our work, assume that the approach volumes and saturation flow rates have already been adjusted d

4. Determine critical lane groups and total t cycle lost time Critical Lane Group: The lane group that has the highest flow ratio (traffic intensity) (v/s) for a given signal phase (lane group with the greatest demand) Calculate the sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Y c (to be used in step 5) Y c = n i= 1 v s ci (v/s) ci = flow ratio for critical lane group i n = number of critical lane groups

4. Determine critical lane groups and total t cycle lost time Total lost time for the cycle, L (to be used in step 5) L = n ( t ) L i= 1 ci (t L ) ci = total lost time for critical lane group i, in seconds n = number of critical lane groups Assume the total lost time for each critical lane group (or phase) is 4 seconds

EXAMPLE What is the sum of the flow ratios for the critical lane groups (Y c )? What is the total lost time for a signal cycle assuming 2 seconds of clearance lost time and 2 seconds of startup lost time per phase? SB 30 400 150 EB 20 200 300 30 WB 100 1000 50 NB

EXAMPLE An intersection operates using a simple 3-phase design as pictured. SB WB EB Phase Lane Saturation Flows group 1 SB 3400 veh/hr 2 NB 3400 veh/hr 3 EB 1400 veh/hr WB 1400 veh/hr NB

EXAMPLE

EXAMPLE

5. Calculate Cycle Length Minimum cycle length C min L X = n X c i= 1 c v s ci C min = estimated minimum cycle length (seconds) L = total lost time per cycle (seconds), 4 seconds per phase is typical (v/s) ci = Y c = flow ratio for critical lane group, i (seconds) X c = critical v/c ratio for the intersection

5. Calculate Cycle Length X c c,, the critical v/c ratio, indicates the desired degree of intersection utilization X c = 1.0 would mean the intersection operates a full capacity, which h is desired d but not practical Therefore, often values less than 1 are assumed for X c (such as 0.90) C min formula calculates the minimum cycle length needed for the intersection to operate at the given capacity utilization, but does not necessarily minimize delay

5. Calculate Cycle Length Calculate the cycle length to minimize delay using: C opt 1.5 ( L)+ ) 5 v 1 i= 1 s = n ci C opt = estimated optimum cycle length (seconds) to minimize vehicle delay L = total lost time per cycle (seconds), 4 seconds per phase is typical (v/s) ci = flow ratio for critical lane group, i (seconds)

5. Calculate Cycle Length Round C up to the nearest 5 seconds Which C should we use??? In practice, an engineer would test out both cycle lengths in the field to see which works better In this example and in the homework, lets just use C min

EXAMPLE Calculate both an optimal cycle length and a minimum cycle length

6. Allocate Green Time Decide how much green time should be allotted to each phase g i = v s i C X c g = effective green time for phase, i (seconds) (v/s) i = flow ratio for lane group, i (seconds) C = cycle length (seconds) X = v/c ratio X c There will be a g value for each phase

6. Allocate Green Time Used a desired X c to calculate C min, but then rounded up C min Recalculate X c using: X c = n i=1 v C s i C L

EXAMPLE Determine the green times allocation (assume C=70 seconds)

EXAMPLE

Steps 7 and 8 Calculate change and clearance intervals In other words, find the yellow (Y) and all-red (AR) times Based on how long (distance) it takes a vehicle to safely stop Check pedestrian crossing time Make sure there is adequate crossing time Sections 7.5.7-7.5.8 Simple plug and chug formulas

Level of Service (LOS) Analysis Based on control delay measure Applies to both signalized and not signalized intersections Referred to as signal delay for a signalized intersection Total delay experienced by the driver as a result of the control Includes deceleration time, queue move-up time, stop time, and acceleration time

Signalized Intersection LOS Based on control delay yper vehicle How long you wait, on average, at the stop light from Highway Capacity Manual 2000 LOS determination approach: Lane group Approach Intersection

Typical Approach (from HCM) Split control delay into three parts Part 1: Delay calculated assuming uniform arrivals (d 1 ) (this is essentially a D/D/1 analysis) Part 2: Delay due to random arrivals (d 2 ) Part 3: Delay due to initial queue at start of analysis time period (d 3 ) ( PF ) + d2 3 d = d + 1 d d = Average signal delay per vehicle in s/veh PF = progression adjustment factor d 1, d 2, d 3 = as defined above

Uniform Delay (d 1 ) d 1 d 1 g 0.5CC 1 = C 1 min 1, Xc 2 g C ( ) = delay due to uniform arrivals (s/veh) C = cycle length (seconds) g = effective green time for lane group (seconds) X c = v/c ratio for lane group PF accounts for the effect of signal progression on quality of delay Use PF = 1

Incremental/Random Delay (d 2 ) d 2 = 900 T X 1 d 2 = delay due to random arrivals (s/veh) + X 1 2 8 kix ct ( ) ( ) c c + c T = duration of analysis period (hours). If the analysis is based on the peak 15-min flow then T = 0.25, if flow based on the peak 1-hr flow then T = 1 hr k = delay adjustment factor that is dependent on signal controller mode. For pretimed intersections k = 0.5. For more efficient intersections k<05 0.5. I = upstream filtering/metering adjustment factor. Adjusts for the effect of an upstream signal on the randomness of the arrival pattern. I = 1.0 for completely random. I < 1.0 for reduced variance. c = lane group capacity (veh/hr) X c = v/c ratio for lane group

Initial Queue Delay (d 3 ) Applied in cases where X > 1.0 for the analysis period Vehicles arriving during the analysis period will experience an additional delay because there is already an existing queue When no initial queue d 3 = 0

EXAMPLE What is the intersection LOS? Assume in all cases that PF = 1.0, T = 1.0 (flow based on 1-hr volumes), k = 0.5 (pretimed intersection), I = 1.0 (no upstream signal effects). EB 20 200 SB 30 400 150 300 30 WB Phase Lane Saturation group Flows 1 SB 3400 veh/hr 2 NB 3400 veh/hr 3 EB 1400 veh/hr WB 1400 veh/hr 100 1000 NB 50 1. Calculate delay for each lane group in an approach 2. Calculate delay for each approach in an intersection 3. Calculate delay for the intersection

EXAMPLE There is only 1 lane group for each approach, therefore lane group delay = approach delay in this example Determine delay for Southbound Approach:

EXAMPLE Northbound Approach

EXAMPLE Eastbound Approach

EXAMPLE Westbound Approach

EXAMPLE To get intersection delay, find the weighted average (by flow) of delay for the four approaches