Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

Similar documents
Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Distinct landscape features with important biologic, hydrologic, geomorphic, and biogeochemical functions.

Identifying, Understanding and Addressing Flood-Related Hazards

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

From Vulnerability to Resilience And the Tools to Get There. Out of Harm s Way Partnership for the Delaware Estuary August 1, 2012

Welcome to NetMap Portal Tutorial

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

GOAL 7 AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS. To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards.

The Refugia Concept: Using Watershed Analysis to Prioritize Salmonid Habitat for Conservation and Restoration

Restoration Goals TFG Meeting. Agenda

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Chapter 6. Fundamentals of GIS-Based Data Analysis for Decision Support. Table 6.1. Spatial Data Transformations by Geospatial Data Types

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 200 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER

A Help Guide for Using gssurgo to Find Potential Wetland Soil Landscapes

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Topic Page: Floodplains

River Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

What is a watershed or landscape perspective?

Sediment and nutrient transport and storage along the urban stream corridor

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

The UN-GGIM: Europe core data initiative to encourage Geographic information supporting Sustainable Development Goals Dominique Laurent, France

Assessment. Assessment

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Historical channel change on the Upper Gila River, Arizona and New Mexico in response to anthropogenic modifications and extreme floods

Sprague River Basin Restoration Post Project Evaluations: Lessons Learned and Future Applications

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

Use of Remote Sensing and GIS for Wetland, Riparian, and Watershed Assessment, Restoration, and Monitoring

1.1 What is Site Fingerprinting?

PolyMet NorthMet Project

SURFACE GEOLOGY AND LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY IN THE INNER RIO GRANDE VALLEY NEAR ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO

Presentation Outline. Project Overview. Sea Level Rise Assessment & Decision Tools. Community Engagement. Tina Whitman, Friends of the San Juans

Great California Delta Trail Blueprint for Contra Costa and Solano Counties GIS AND MAPPING MEMORANDUM JULY 2010

Section 4: Model Development and Application

South Florida Coastal Storm Surge and Mapping Study

Catastrophic Events Impact on Ecosystems

Betsy Stevenson and Allison Mohrs (Skagit County Planning and Development Services) Jenny Baker, The Nature Conservancy

Best Management Practices for Coldwater Fisheries Enhancement and Restoration

Environmental Geology Chapter 9 Rivers and Flooding

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

Mobrand to Jones and Stokes. Sustainable Fisheries Management Use of EDT

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 200 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER PHASE III REPORT

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

Jeff Opperman Final Report for Fellowship R/SF-4

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

Summary of Available Datasets that are Relevant to Flood Risk Characterization

Diego Burgos. Geology 394. Advisors: Dr. Prestegaard. Phillip Goodling

Hydrologic Analysis for Ecosystem Restoration

GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

Landscape Planning Framework

Grant 0299-NEP: Water Resources Project Preparatory Facility

Defining the Limit of Regulated Areas. C.1 Defining the River or Stream Flood Hazard 138. C.2 Defining the River or Stream Erosion Hazard 139

GIS Data and Technology to Support Transportation & MPO Decision-Making & Planning. using an Eco-Logical* Approach within the Kansas City Region

Ecological Land Cover Classification For a Natural Resources Inventory in the Kansas City Region, USA

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Natural hazards in Glenorchy Summary Report May 2010

STREAM RESTORATION AWRA Summer Specialty Conference, GIS and Water Resources IX

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

3D Elevation Program, Lidar in Missouri. West Central Regional Advanced LiDAR Workshop Ray Fox

THE 3D SIMULATION INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING THE FLOODING LOST IN KEELUNG RIVER BASIN

Fluvial Geomorphic Guidelines

They include earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, landslides, and other processes and occurrences. They are included in the broader concept of.

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Introduction Fluvial Processes in Small Southeastern Watersheds

APPENDIX PHASE 1 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK

USGS Hydrography Overview. May 9, 2018

Flood Inundation Mapping

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

Miami-Dade County Technical Update Meeting South Florida Coastal Study. May 11, 2016

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in restored riverine floodplains in intensively managed watersheds

Flood Hazard Zone Modeling for Regulation Development

Appendix D. Sediment Texture and Other Soil Data

RAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

4.17 Spain. Catalonia

RESTORATION DESIGN FOR REROUTED WATERCOURSES

Quantifying and Valuing Floodplain Nutrient and Sediment Retention

The Coastal Change Analysis Program and the Land Cover Atlas. Rebecca Love NOAA Office for Coastal Management

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

Geomorphology Of The Chilliwack River Watershed Landform Mapping At North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Washington By National Park Service


Pequabuck River Flooding Study and Flood Mitigation Plan The City of Bristol and Towns of Plainville and Plymouth, CT

Chapter 7 Mudflow Analysis

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

Transcription:

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin Christopher Konrad, US Geological Survey Tim Beechie, NOAA Fisheries

Managing floodplains for multiple benefits Rationale: large-scale projects must incorporate broader objectives; more efficient than projects working in opposition to each other; functional floodplains are capable with risk reduction 3. Managing floodplains for multiple benefits

Uses of Puget Sound Floodplains Source: NOAA C-CAP Source: Washington Department of Ecology 15% of urban areas 30% of highly developed urban areas 70% of cultivated land 2. Social values of floodplains

Ecological characteristics Cut bank Backwater Lateral Pool Island Gravel bar/riffle Chute Determinants Lateral and longitudinal connectivity with river Vertical zonation 0.5 km Side channel Springbrook Fine-scale heterogeneity/diversity of habitats Flood-mediated disturbance regime Full representation of successional stages Mid-to late seral stage Early seral stage New colonization 1. Floodplains as landforms and ecosystems

Overview of assessment Goal: identify areas where ecological function can be improved and flood-related risk can be reduced Audience: 1 o regional planners, state and federal policy makers and funders; 2 o local floodplain managers with information needs Geographic scope: valleys of 17 major rivers draining to Puget Sound Resolution: attributes (topography, land cover, etc.) indicating function and risk are represented on 10 m grids Output: primarily categorical (1, 2, 3) that is transparent rather than ordinal (1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd ) that has implicit valuation

Where are opportunities? 1. Current ecological function can be improved by re-connecting floodplain areas to rivers and/or changing land cover/land use >> Assess current functions 2. Flood risk can be reduced by enhancing protection, increasing resilience, or reducing exposure >> Assess current risks

Ecological functions of floodplains 1. Store and convey floods 2. Supply and retain sediment and wood in river networks 3. Retain and transform nutrients and contaminants 4. Support forest ecosystems 5. Provide aquatic habitats

Floodplain fragmentation Roads, levees, and railroads fragment floodplains and disconnect some fragments from rivers. Valley bottom; above floodplain Total area (sq km) Floodplain, connected Floodplain, disconnected <10 <100 <1000 >1000 Fragment size (ha = 2.5 acres)

Function 4: support floodplain forests Stillaguamish River at the confluence with Pilchuck River Connected floodplain with forest, wetland Connected floodplain with modified cover Disconnected floodplain with forest, wetland Disconnected floodplain with modified cover

Risk: Hazard+ Exposure Hazards 1. Inundation during floods 2. Channel occupation Exposure 1. Key facilities 2. Land uses (agriculture, medium/high development) 3. Transportation corridors (roads)

Key facilities 1251 Class A or B water systems 47 Municipal wastewater treatment facilities or large septic systems 191 Fire stations, hospitals, or emergency medical service facilities 2. Social values of floodplains

Logic models to produce categories of function or risk Function 1. Store and route floods: 3: connected river area, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads 2: connected low floodplain, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads; 1: connected high floodplain, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads; -1: disconnected floodplain, undeveloped -2: connected floodplain with medium/high development Function 3a. De-nitrification: 2: Wetland, shallow groundwater, or hydric soils; no impervious surfaces, soil>30% silt /clay, >2% organic material 2: Wetland, shallow groundwater, or hydric soils; no impervious surfaces, soil >30% silt/clay, <2% organic material 4. Assessment of ecological functions and risks to people

Opportunities to combine flood risk reduction and improved ecological function Criteria: Fragment is connected or 1 o of disconnection Development or key facilities At least 10 ha of undeveloped land

Opportunities to increase flood conveyance and aquatic habitat in floodplain units with relatively narrow active channels Channel width (m) Wide Narrow Drainage area (sq km)

Fish-related products Delineation of rivers Upstream length of Chinook-bear stream: green > 400 km, red < 100 km

Summary Assessment of ecological functions and flood-related risks to people on floodplains along 17 major rivers in Puget Sound basin will be published by USGS in 2014, geospatial information will be available on-line Contributes basic information (delineation of low floodplains, river areas, and fragmentation) and integrates disparate information to facilitate regional planning and management of floodplains..

Additional slides

Floodplain Recovery Target Puget Sound Partnership 2020 floodplain recovery target includes restoration of 15% of degraded floodplain. Meets minimal criteria for functional 1067 sq km of degraded floodplain (disconnected or modified land cover)

Differentiating types of floodplain based on relative elevation Land surface elevation relative to river Land surface elevation from LiDAR, 1.8 m 10 m 0 m GIS based method for determining the elevation of the land surface relative to the river ( Height above Water Surface, Jones 2006) 1. Floodplains as landforms and ecosystems

Delineating high floodplain, low floodplain, and river areas Elevation of land relative to river Apply threshold 1. Floodplains as landforms and ecosystems Low floodplain

Channel movement across floodplains links physical process to biological structure 100 200 Frequency of channel occupation 300 400 500 600 700 800 Channel occupies nearly the same location from 1936 to 2002, little interaction with floodplain 900 Channel actively 1000 migrating, 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 re-occupies many of the same locations but allows forest succession in other locations to older seral stages Middle Green River, WA Konrad, CP 2012, Journal of Geophysical Research 117, G00N13

Integrated floodplain management Levee setbacks Puyallup River, WA Floodplain reconnected by levee setback Seasonal use Yolo Bypass, CA Raising infrastructure - farm equipment pads Konrad et al. 2008, River Research and Applications 24

FLOODPLAIN FUNCTIONS 1. Store and route floods fn1 = fp * vb_undev - 2 * (fp > 0) * (1 - vb_mhdev)*(1-vb_undev) 3: connected river area, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads 2: connected low floodplain, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads; 1: connected high floodplain, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads; 0: not floodplain or road/levee/railroad -1: disconnected floodplain, undeveloped -2: connected floodplain with low development 1a. Store floodwater fn1a = (dstage_high dz_ned) * (fp > 0) (fp == -1) > 0: depth of water over floodplain during a nominal flood in meters; 0: valley bottom areas outside of floodplain; road/levee/railroad -1: disconnected areas of floodplain 1b. Convey floods fn1b = (fp > 1) * (vb_undev) * (riv_grad_ned) hydraulic gradient (m/m) 0: areas outside of LiDAR coverage; disconnected floodplain; high floodplain; valley bottom; or road/levee/railroad 2. Regulate sediment and wood supplies in river networks 4: forest areas adjacent to river composed of unconsolidated material; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads 3: undeveloped areas adjacent to river composed of unconsolidated material without forest; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads 2: forested connected floodplain composed of unconsolidated material; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads 1: undeveloped connected floodplain composed of unconsolidated material without forest; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads, 0: not erodible material; floodplain with roads, levees, or railroads; valley bottom areas outside of floodplain -1: developed areas adjacent to river composed of unconsolidated material; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads -2: developed, connected floodplain composed of unconsolidated material; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads -3: undeveloped disconnected floodplain composed of unconsolidated material -4: developed disconnected floodplain composed of unconsolidated material; no impervious, roads, railroads, or levees -5: areas adjacent to river composed of unconsolidated material, with impervious, roads, levees, or railroads 2a Supply sediment