Part II: Thin Film Characterization

Similar documents
Electron Microprobe Analysis 1 Nilanjan Chatterjee, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist

Electron Microprobe Analysis 1 Nilanjan Chatterjee, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Basic structure of SEM

= 6 (1/ nm) So what is probability of finding electron tunneled into a barrier 3 ev high?

Why microscopy?

Part I Basics and Methods

Modern Optical Spectroscopy

Gaetano L Episcopo. Scanning Electron Microscopy Focus Ion Beam and. Pulsed Plasma Deposition

Nano-Microscopy. Lecture 2. Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscopies: Principles. Pavel Zinin HIGP, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Chapter 9. Electron mean free path Microscopy principles of SEM, TEM, LEEM

Invited Lecture. "Different Aspects of Electron Microscopy. Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat. Deepak Rajput & S.K.

AP5301/ Name the major parts of an optical microscope and state their functions.

SOLID STATE PHYSICS PHY F341. Dr. Manjuladevi.V Associate Professor Department of Physics BITS Pilani

Imaging Methods: Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM / AFM)

Everhart-Thornley detector

The illumination source: the electron beam

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

h p λ = mν Back to de Broglie and the electron as a wave you will learn more about this Equation in CHEM* 2060

Scanning Electron Microscopy & Ancillary Techniques

Practical course in scanning electron microscopy

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Analytical Methods for Materials

SEM Doctoral Course MS-636. April 11-13, 2016

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Nilanjan Chatterjee

3 Scanning Electron Microscopy

Nova 600 NanoLab Dual beam Focused Ion Beam IITKanpur

ABC s of Electrochemistry series Materials Characterization techniques: SEM and EDS Ana María Valenzuela-Muñiz November 3, 2011

Electron probe microanalysis - Electron microprobe analysis EPMA (EMPA) What s EPMA all about? What can you learn?

object objective lens eyepiece lens

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Questions/Answers. Chapter 1

Electron Microscopy I

EDS User School. Principles of Electron Beam Microanalysis

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) Prof. Paul K. Chu

HOW TO APPROACH SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY AND ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY ANALYSIS. SCSAM Short Course Amir Avishai

Transmission Electron Microscopy

SEM stands for Scanning Electron Microscopy. The earliest known work describing

SEM Optics and Application to Current Research

Ecole Franco-Roumaine : Magnétisme des systèmes nanoscopiques et structures hybrides - Brasov, Modern Analytical Microscopic Tools

M2 TP. Low-Energy Electron Diffraction (LEED)

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

Electron-Matter Interactions

Weak-Beam Dark-Field Technique

tip conducting surface

Electron beam scanning

Introduction to electron microscopes: electron optics, interactions and signals

Electron Microprobe Analysis and Scanning Electron Microscopy

MEMS Metrology. Prof. Tianhong Cui ME 8254

4. Inelastic Scattering

Methods of surface analysis

MODERN TECHNIQUES OF SURFACE SCIENCE

Chapter 12. Nanometrology. Oxford University Press All rights reserved.

CHARACTERIZATION of NANOMATERIALS KHP

Scanning electron microscopy

Interactions with Matter

Chemical Analysis in TEM: XEDS, EELS and EFTEM. HRTEM PhD course Lecture 5

Low kv Scanning Electron Microscopy

SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE

Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Introduction to Electron Beam Lithography

Ma5: Auger- and Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

Lecture 5: Characterization methods

Characterization Tools

Because light behaves like a wave, we can describe it in one of two ways by its wavelength or by its frequency.

ECE Semiconductor Device and Material Characterization

Scanning Probe Microscopy. EMSE-515 F. Ernst

á1181ñ SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

EE 527 MICROFABRICATION. Lecture 5 Tai-Chang Chen University of Washington

Chapter 10. Nanometrology. Oxford University Press All rights reserved.

5.8 Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

Introduction to Electron Microscopy Andres Kaech. Instrumentation

An Anomalous Contrast in Scanning Electron Microscopy of Insulators: The Pseudo Mirror Effect.

New technique for in-situ measurement of backscattered and. secondary electron yields for the calculation of signal-to-noise ratio in a SEM

Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS)

April 10th-12th, 2017

Photoemission Spectroscopy

Lecture 20 Optical Characterization 2

Surface Analysis. Dr. Lynn Fuller Dr. Fuller s Webpage:

Nanoelectronics 09. Atsufumi Hirohata Department of Electronics. Quick Review over the Last Lecture

Electron microscopy in molecular cell biology I

Auger Electron Spectroscopy *

Appearance Potential Spectroscopy

Chapter 2 Structure and Imaging of a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 11: Scanning Probe Microscopy. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

Nanophysics: Main trends

Nanostructure. Materials Growth Characterization Fabrication. More see Waser, chapter 2

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 19 Chapter 12. Chem 4631

Basics of Scanning Electron Microscopy

CBE Science of Engineering Materials. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Information from Every Angle

Chapter 4 Scintillation Detectors

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)

Kavli Workshop for Journalists. June 13th, CNF Cleanroom Activities

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS

Metal Deposition. Filament Evaporation E-beam Evaporation Sputter Deposition

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Studies of the Ge(111) Surface

MSN551 LITHOGRAPHY II

Transcription:

Part II: Thin Film Characterization General details of thin film characterization instruments 1. Introduction to Thin Film Characterization Techniques 2. Structural characterization: SEM, TEM, AFM, STM 3. Chemical characterization: AES, SIMS, RBS, XRD, XPS, XRF 4. Thickness characterization: Optical techniques, stylus profilometry, etc. Size: Cost: - varies from a portable desktop interferrometer to the 50-ft long accerlerator and beam line of a Rutherford backscattering (RBS) facility - ranges from the modest cost of test instruments required to measure electrical resistance of films to the approximate $1,000,000 price tag of a commercial SIMS spectrometer. Operating environment: - varies from the ambient in the measurement of film thickness to the 10-10 -torr vacuum required for the measurement of film surface composition. Referenced Textbooks and Articles 1. M. Ohring, The Materials Science of Thin Films, Academic Press, San Diego (1992) 2. J.I. Goldstein, D.E. Newbury, P. Echlin, D.C. Joy, C. Fiori and E. Lifshin, Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, Plenum, New York (1981) 3. W.A. Pliskin and S.J. Zanin, in Handbook of Thin Films Technology, eds. L.I. Maissel and R. Glang, McGraw-Hill, New York (1970) Sophistication: - At one extreme is the manual scotch-tape film peel test for adhesion, and at the other is an assortment of electron microscopes and surface analytical equipment where operation and data gathering, analysis, and display are essentially computer-controlled.

Film Properties Structural Characterization 1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Common required film properties - Film morphology and structure - Film compositions - Film thickness Other properties related to specific applications - hardness, adhesion, stress, electrical conductivity, reflectivity, refractive index, magnetic domains, electrical polarization, etc. Specifications Figure 1. A picture of an ultra-high resolution SEM. (From Hitachi High-Technologies Canada, Inc.) Image resolution 0.5 nm @30kV guaranteed (magnification = 600,000x ) 1.8 nm @ 1kV guaranteed (magnification = 150,000x ) (secondary electron image with test specimen) Magnification: 60x - 2,000,000x Accelerating voltage: 0.5-30 kv Electron gun: cold field emission source

Wehnelt Cylinder Figure 3. Wehnelt cylinder. Figure 2. A schematic of the electron and x-ray optics of a combined SEM-EPMA (Electron Probe Microanalysis).

Important Features of SEM 1. Electron gun 1.1 Tungsten hairpin electron gun - size: ~100 µm wire - tip radius: ~100 µm - thermionic emission: resistive heating (i f ) is required. - source size: ~30-100 µm - usage: reliable, properties are well understood, relatively inexpensive, not so high brightness (for low magnification applications), stable high currents (for X-ray microanalysis) - At a temperature of 2700 K and a brightness of 10 5 A/cm 2 sr, a typical lifetime is about 30-100 h in a reasonably good vacuum (10-5 torr). 1.2 Lanthanum hexaboride (LaB 6 ) electron gun - most common thermionic electron source - high brightness (5-10 times > tungsten) - typical operating temperature: 1800 K lower operating temperature increases the lifetime of the filament. - requires better vacuum condition (better than 10-7 torr) LaB 6 is extremely chemically reactive when hot and it readily forms compounds with elements in the gas phase that poisons the cathode and reduce its emission. The volatile oxides of La and B which form in the presence of water vapor or oxygen may cause a significant loss of material. - size of single crystal block: ~100 µm - tip radius: 1-10 µm - operation: activation period (slow heating of filament current) is required to evaporate contaminants on the surface of LaB 6. -usage: LaB 6 is more expensive (10 times > tungsten) has longer filament life.

1.3 Field emission electron guns - resistive heating of filament (to eject electrons) not required - electrons emitted (tunneled) by high applied electric field (> 10 7 V/cm) - made of wire of single crystal tungsten fashioned into a sharp point and spot-welded to a tungsten hairpin. - tip radius: < 100 nm - Types of field emitter (a) cold field emitter source size is small that little demagnification of the beam is necessary to form a small spot on the order of 1-2 nm. energy spread is low which improves performance for low-voltage operation. require vacuum better than 10-10 torr need to heat tip (from time to time) to about 2500 K to clean off adsorbed gas atoms. The process is called "flashing". (b) thermal field emitter heating a <100> single crystal tungsten field emitter to 1800 K in a strong electric field, building up and sharpening up the tip. continuous heating of the tip at 1300-2000 K to prevent gas molecules from adsorbing on tip's surface may be operated in 10-9 torr vacuum condition. (c) Schottky emitter operated at 1800 K uses a ZrO coating on a <100> tungsten facet at the tip to reduce the work function and flat emitting area provides good emission stability. need greater demagnification to produce 1-2 nm spot. (a) (b) (c) Figure 4. SEM micrographs of (a) tungsten hairpin filament, (b) LaB 6 filament and (c) field emission electron gun.

2. Electron lenses Figure 5. Schematic diagram of a directly heated LaB 6 emitter that directly replaces a tungsten filament assembly. - electromagnetic lenses - demagnify the image of the crossover in the electron gun (d 0 ~ 10-50 µm for a thermionic gun) to the final spot size on the specimen (1 nm - 1 µm) - Types of lenses (a) condenser lenses: demagnify electron-beam crossover diameter (b) objective lenses: final lens in the column for probe formation pinhole lens: - large specimen can be studied and its size is limited by size of speciment chamber below the lens. - large variability working distance allows excellent depth of field at long working distance (and long focal length). - working distance: 5-40 mm - focal length: 10-40 mm - subject to lens aberration and hence reduction of image resolution. immersion lens: - specimen is immersed in magnetic field - focal lengths: 2-5 mm - only a small specimen can be studied. - lowest aberrations, smallest probe size, highest image resolution. Figure 6. Schematic diagram comparing tip shapes for the Schottky emitter, cold field emitter, and thermal field emitter. (adapted from Tuggle et al., 1985)

Figure 7. A rotationally symmetric electron lens where the coil windings are inside the iron shell and the field is produced across the lens gap between polepieces. (adapted from Hall, 1966) Figure 8. Enlarged schematic of polepiece area showing the forces on an electron that cause it to be focused. Figure 9. Two objective lens configurations. (a) Asymmetrical pinhole lens or conical lens, allowing a large speciment to be placed outside the lens. (b) Symmetrical immersion lens, where a small specimen is placed inside the lens.

3. Electron-Specimen Interactions 3.1 Elastic scattering - affect the trajectories of the beam electrons inside the specimen without altering the kinetic energy of the electron. - responsible for back-scattered electrons (0 E BSE E 0 with energy distribution peaking in the range 0.8-0.9E 0 for targets of intermediate and high atomic number.) 3.2 Inelastic scattering - results in a transfer of energy from the beam electrons to the atoms of the specimen. - responsible for generation of secondary electrons (0 E SE 50 ev with most probable energy of 3-5 ev) Auger electrons characteristic and Bremsstrahlung (continuum) X-rays electron-hole pairs in semiconductors and insulators long-wavelength electromagnetic radiation in the visible, ultraviolet and infrared regions of the spectrum (cathodoluminescence) lattice vibrations (phonons) electron oscillations in metals (plasmons) Figure 10. (a) electron and photon signals emanating from tear-shaped interaction volume during electron-beam impingement on specimen surface. (b) Energy spectrum of electrons emitted from specimen surface. (c) Effect of surface topography on electron emission. (From Ref. [1]) Figure 11. Schematic illustration of the origin of two sources of secondary electrons in the sample. Incident beam electrons (B) generate secondary electrons (SE I ) upon entering the sample. Backscattered electrons (BSE) generate secondary electrons (SE II ) while leaving the sample. λ is the mean free path for secondary electrons.

4. Detectors 4.1 Everhart-Thornley detector - most commonly used in SEM - used to detect secondary electrons and sometimes backscattered electrons Figure 12. Monte Carlo electron-trajectory simulations of the interaction volume in iron as a function of beam energy: (a) 10 kev, (b) 20 kev, (c) 30 kev Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the Everhart-Thornley detector: B, backscattered-electron trajectories; SE, secondary-electron trajectoreis; F, Faraday cage (bias range -50 V to +250 V); S, scintillator, with thin metallic coating (high bias, +12 kv) supply to the scintillator coating; LG, light guide; PM, photomultiplier.

4.2 Dedicated backscattered electron detector - usually placed near near the specimen - Examples: scintillator detector, BSE-to-SE detector, solid-state diode detector 4.3 Electron-Beam-Induced Current (EBIC) - use the specimen as a detector - when the primary electron beam strikes the surface, electron-hole pairs are generated and the resulting current is collected to modulate the intensity of the CRT image. 4.4 X-ray detectors - gas-proportional counter 5. Applications of SEM Figure 14. (a) Schematic diagram of a solid-state BSE detector, showing separation of electron-hole pairs by an applied external potential. (b) Typical installation of a solid-state detector on the polepiece of the objective lens. - topographic contrast (surface imaging) - compositional contrast - elevated-pressure (1-10 torr) microscopy - stereo microscopy

Figure 15. Magnification series of a fracture surface of high-purity iron, illustrating the rapid surveying capability of the SEM. The images are recorded at constant objective lens strength and working distance. Note that focus is maintained throughout the series and there is no image rotation. Figure 16. (a) Optical micrograph of the radiolarian Trochodiscus longispinus (b) SEM micrograph of same radiolarian. The greater depth of focus and superior resolving capability are apparent.

Figure 17. High-resolution secondary electron images of the surface of the magnetic storage of a computer hard disc. Image recorded at 35 kev on a field-emission SEM with signal collection from an E-T detector. Two magnifications of the same area are shown. Figure 18. The specimen is Raney nickel, which contains multiple phases that produce atomic number contrast and surface defects that produce topographic contrast. (a) specimen is viewed with a positively biased E-T detector, showing predominantly topographic contrast. (b) Four-quadrant solid-state BSE detector gives an atomic number contrast.

Figure 19. Atomic number (compositional contrast) observed in an aluminum-nickel alloy (Raney nickel). (a) Backscatteredelectron image derived from a negatively biased Everhart- Thornley detector. (b) Direct specimen-current image of the same region; note the contrast reversal compared to (a).