NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C

Similar documents
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C.

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C.

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD. Meteorological Factual Report [DCA96MA070] Gregory D. Salottolo (11 Pages)

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Office of Research and Engineering Vehicle Performance Division (RE60) Washmgton, D.C

NCAR UCAR. 50 th Anniversary Lecture

National Transportation Safety Board Office of Aviation Safety Washington, D.C December 10, 2012 WEATHER STUDY DCA13RA025

Weather vs. Climate. Tucson NWS homepage:

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

Debbie Lee, Communications and Public Affairs Officer. Update on Southern California Edison s Capital Improvement Projects

Effects of Nuclear Weapons

Hubble Telescope Deployment. Peacekeeper Charles Bolden. Deputy Commander of U.S. forces in Japan

A Simple Analysis of Fuel Addition to the CWT of 747

DETECTION OF NATURALLY OCCURRING EVENTS FROM SMALL APERTURE INFRASOUND ARRAYS

Tropical Update. 5 PM EDT Sunday, September 10, 2017 Hurricane Irma, Hurricane Jose, Tropical Wave (60%)

GC Briefing. Weather Sentinel Tropical Storm Michael. Status at 8 AM EDT (12 UTC) Today (NHC) Discussion. October 11, 2018

Severe Weather: Tornadoes and Hurricanes

Deriving Meteorological Data from free-to-air Mode-S broadcasts in an Australian Context.

MA MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT

09 December 2005 snow event by Richard H. Grumm National Weather Service Office State College, PA 16803

Trend

Hurricane Katrina Tracking Lab

August 20, EPICS Design 1 Teams Design EPICS Program Colorado School of Mines th Street Golden, CO Dear EPICS 1 Teams,

Guidance to Instructors on Subject Delivery PILOT NAVIGATION. This is a suggested programme for the delivery of this subject.

Tropical Update. 11 AM EDT Wednesday, October 10, 2018 Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Leslie & Tropical Storm Nadine, Caribbean Low (40%)

Answer Key. Page 1 of 5

IOP-2 Summary of Operations 03 June UTC 04 June UTC Authors: Market, Kastman

Section 7: Hazard Avoidance

William H. Bauman III * NASA Applied Meteorology Unit / ENSCO, Inc. / Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida

METEOROLOGY PANEL (METP) WORKING GROUP- METEOROLOGICAL OPERATION GROUP (MOG) FIRST MEETING

NAVIGATION AND VESSEL INSPECTION CIRCULAR NO

Into the storm: Using drones to track twisters

Unmanned Aircraft Hurricane Reconnaissance. Pat Fitzpatrick GeoSystems Research Institute Mississippi State University Stennis Space Center branch

Observations from Plant City Municipal Airport during the time period of interest are summarized below:

Lecture #18 (April 12, 2010, Monday) Tropical Storms & Hurricanes Part 3. Hurricane Floyd September 15, 1999

Department of Earth & Climate Sciences San Francisco State University Fall 2016 ERTH 360. Homework #1 Answer Sheet (Graphics Online) 100 points

Hurricane Wilma Post Storm Data Acquisition Estimated Peak Wind Analysis and Storm Tide Data. December 27, 2005

LAB C - GEOGRAPHIC GRID AND TIME

Application #: TEXT

Hurricane Charley: A Retrospective 2014 Florida Governor s Hurricane Conference

The force of gravity holds us on Earth and helps objects in space stay

RISK FACTORS FOR FATAL GENERAL AVIATION ACCIDENTS IN DEGRADED VISUAL CONDITIONS

An illustration of the practical use in aviation of operational real-time geostationary satellite data

CHAPTER 10. TORNADOES AND WINDSTORMS

SA A NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD. Airplane Performance Study Korean Air Flight 801 DCA97MA058. Docket No. Exhibit No. WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C.

P474 SYDNEY AIRPORT WIND SHEAR ENCOUNTER - 15 APRIL 2007

Tropical Update. 5 PM EDT Thursday, August 27, 2015 Tropical Storm Erika

Space Debris Re-entries and Aviation Safety

Lesson 1. Investigation. Name:

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. SAFETY RECOMMENDATION LETTER TO THE FAA dated NOVEMBER 21, 1994, AND RESPONSES.

DLR Falcon Dropsonde Operation in T-PARC and Analysis of the Environment Surrounding Typhoons

ATMO Exam 3 Spring Print your name ID Number

Dangerous Weather: Hurricanes and Tornadoes

1. How many hours did the Titanic travel before hitting the iceberg? Show your work. Round to three decimal places of accuracy.

Flight Data Analysis Using Limited Data Sets

2008 Hurricane Caravan. Daniel Noah Meteorologist National Weather Service x1 May 22, 2008

1st Annual Southwest Ohio Snow Conference April 8, 2010 Abner F. Johnson, Office of Maintenance - RWIS Coordinator

PS : ES Hurricane Tracking Lab

THE DEEPENING OF A LOW-LEVEL TROUGH AS INDICATED BY DUST ALOFT IN GOES ' INFRARED PICTURES

Margin of Error. What is margin of error and why does it exist?

REDUCING THE IMPACT OF NOISE ABATEMENT STRATEGIES ON AIRPORT CAPACITY BY FORECASTING NOISE

Department of Earth & Climate Sciences San Francisco State University Fall 2018 ERTH 360. Homework #1 Answer Sheet (Graphics Online) 100 points

Explosive volcanic eruptions in the North Pacific: Interactions between the Alaska Volcano Observatory and Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers

Pope Benedict XVI NYC Visit FLIGHT ADVISORY

Radar Analysis of Second Wave of UFO Sightings Near Stephenville, Texas. October 21 and 23, 2008

Storm Summary for Hurricane Jose

ROYAL CANADIAN AIR CADETS PROFICIENCY LEVEL FOUR INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE SECTION 1 EO M DEFINE AIR NAVIGATION TERMS PREPARATION

An Application of the Improved Models for Risk Assessment of Runway Excursion in Korea

Tropical Update. 11 AM EDT Tuesday, October 9, 2018 Hurricane Michael, Tropical Storm Leslie, Tropical Storm Nadine

Climate Outlook through 2100 South Florida Ecological Services Office Vero Beach, FL January 13, 2015

Climate Outlook through 2100 South Florida Ecological Services Office Vero Beach, FL September 9, 2014

Cardinal and Intermediate Directions:

Weather Launch Console and Jobs. Stephanie Stevenson

HURRICANES AND TORNADOES

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A04A0057 WING SCRAPE DURING A REJECTED LANDING

Flight Report September 12, 2014 Summary

Heavy rains and precipitable water anomalies August 2010 By Richard H. Grumm And Jason Krekeler National Weather Service State College, PA 16803

Meteorology in Continuous Descent Operations

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis

Flight Report September 09, 2014 Summary

Flight Report Sunday September 21, 2014 Summary

^_ Key Observation Point Viewshed Model. Grazing Yak Solar Project. Key Observation Point Location Map KOP #6 KOP #3 KOP #1 KOP #2 KOP #4 KOP #5

Montserrat Eruption = Monster rat

Section 8.1 & 8.2 Systems of Equations

July 13, 2017 Session #1 In Lieu of the Surface Observation Including EWINS Authority, RTMA, Web Cams, and Remote Observation Systems

FUTURE PLAN AND RECENT ACTIVITIES FOR THE JAPANESE FOLLOW-ON GEOSTATIONARY METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE HIMAWARI-8/9

Volcanic Ash. Risk Management. GE Aviation Perspective on Operations in a Volcanic Ash Environment. Roger Dinius Jan. 20, 2011

Seismic Observations during September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attack

AMDAR Forecast Applications. Richard Mamrosh NWS Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA

IMPACT OF WEATHER FACTORS ON GO-AROUND OCCURRENCE BHARATH DONAVALLI THESIS

Montréal, 7 to 18 July 2014

Kudryavtsev A. Yu., Zhelezov S.A., (Sarov Engineering Center) Polovin M.M., Litvinov M.S. (Sukhoi Civil Aircraft)

Learning to Fly. Denise Russo. September 17, 2010

6.2. TWO-VARIABLE LINEAR SYSTEMS

Automated Thunderstorm Alert Service (ATSAS) User Guide

REPORT. PO Box 231, N-2001 LILLESTRØM Telephone: REP.: 61/2000 Telefax: Date: 2 October 2000

Jaclyn A. Shafer * NASA Applied Meteorology Unit / ENSCO, Inc. / Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida

Preliminary Results from the ATHENA-OAWL Venture Tech Airborne Mission

Methane Sensing Flight of Scanning HIS over Hutchinson, KS, 31 March 2001

INTEGRATED TURBULENCE FORECASTING ALGORITHM 2001 METEOROLOGICAL EVALUATION

Transcription:

DOCKET NO. SA- 516 EXHIBIT NO. 4 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C WITNESSES 4 - RADAR DATA FOR MISSILE VISIBILITY TESTS (138 Pages)

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Office of Research and Engineering Washington, D.C. 20594 August 9, 2000 Witnesses 4 - Radar Data for Missile Visibility Tests by Daniel R. Bower, Ph.D. National Transportation Safety Board Office of Research and Engineering A. ACCIDENT: DCA-96-MA-070 Location: East Moriches, New York Date: July 17, 1996 Time: 2031 Eastern Daylight Time Airplane: Boeing 747-131, N93119 B. GROUP Not Applicable C. SUMMARY On July 17, 1996, at 2031 EDT, a Boeing 747-131, N93119, crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, about 8 miles south of East Moriches, New York, after taking off from John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK). The airplane was being operated on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan under the provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulation (CFR), Part 121, on a regularly scheduled flight to Charles De Gaulle International Airport (CDG), Paris, France, as Trans World Airlines (TWA) Flight 800. The airplane was destroyed by explosion, fire, and impact forces with the ocean. All 230 people aboard were killed. In support of the investigation into the TWA Flight 800 accident, radar data was obtained for the area surrounding Fort Walton Beach, Florida, during a missile visibility test on the evening of 29 April 2000 between 0000 and 0130 UTC time. 1

D. DETAILS OF THE INVESTIGATION Radar data was obtained from the United States Air Force 84 th Radar Evaluation Squadron (RADES) for 0000 UTC to 0130 UTC for the evening of 29 April. This corresponds to the time of day on 29 April 2000 when the Safety Board performed several missile visibility tests. RADES radar data included primary, secondary, and reinforced 1 radar targets from the following radar sites: Fort Green, FL (FTG); Slidell, LA (SLD); Tyndall Air Force Base, FL (TYN); Citronelle, AL (QRB); Cross City, FL (CCY); Whitehouse, FL (WHT). Three of the tests, which involved firing of a portable MANPADS missile, occurred between 0030 and 0100 UTC. The radar data for this time was examined to determine if the missile appeared as a primary radar return. The missile was launched at a high angle, though less than 90 degrees, aimed in a southerly direction. The prevailing upper level and surface winds at the time were north-northwesterly. Launch times were 0031:01, 0035:00, and 0050:02 UTC. The missile flew for less than 20 seconds before self-destruction. Radar data between 0030:00 and 0035:00 UTC is plotted in figure 1, covering an area of approximately 130x80 nautical miles (nm). Figure 2 shows the data between 0030:00 and 0037:00 UTC, and figure 3 shows the data between 0030:00 and 0100:00 UTC. All of the primaries that appeared in the area of the launch between 0030 and 0100 are plotted over a smaller area near the launch site in figure 4, with the times noted. The symbols denoted with x appeared after the first launch, and the symbols denoted with a box appeared after the third launch. No primary returns were noted in the area after the second launch. In each case the primaries occurred after the time of missile selfdestruct, and there is no identifiable ground track that can be associated with the test missiles. All the data between 0030 and 0100 is shown in tabular form in attachment I. Daniel R. Bower, Ph.D. Aerospace Engineer - Performance 1 A primary only target is received as a reflection of radar energy only. A secondary or beacon only target is recorded as a response of the aircraft s transponder to interrogation by the radar system. A reinforced target is recorded by the radar system in lieu of a primary or secondary target when transponder information is coincident with and reinforces a reflection of radar energy. Generally, secondary and reinforced returns are referred to as secondary targets. 2

Radar Data from 00:30:00 00:35:00 UTC Launch site Figure 4 Inset Blue symbols denote Primary returns Red symbols denote Beacon returns Green symbols denote Reinforced returns Figure 1 RADES Radar Data, 5 minute Duration 3

Radar Data from 00:30:00 00:37:00 UTC Launch site Figure 4 Inset Blue symbols denote Primary returns Red symbols denote Beacon returns Green symbols denote Reinforced returns Figure 2 RADES Radar Data, 7 minute Duration 4

Radar Data from 00:30:00 01:00:00 UTC Launch site Figure 4 Inset Blue symbols denote Primary returns Red symbols denote Beacon returns Green symbols denote Reinforced returns Figure 3 RADES Radar Data, 30 minute Duration 5

Figure 4 All Primary Radar Data close to Launch Site Between 0030 0100 UTC Launch 1 at 0031:01 UTC X Launch 2 at 0035:00 UTC Launch 3 at 0050:02 UTC 6