RESOLUTION MSC.362(92) (Adopted on 14 June 2013) REVISED RECOMMENDATION ON A STANDARD METHOD FOR EVALUATING CROSS-FLOODING ARRANGEMENTS

Similar documents
39.1 Gradually Varied Unsteady Flow

Evaluation of Scantlings of Corrugated Transverse Watertight Bulkheads in Non-CSR Bulk Carriers Considering Hold Flooding

Chapter 3 Water Flow in Pipes

One-Dimensional Motion Review IMPORTANT QUANTITIES Name Symbol Units Basic Equation Name Symbol Units Basic Equation Time t Seconds Velocity v m/s

An Improved Expression for a Classical Type of Explicit Approximation of the Colebrook White Equation with Only One Internal Iteration

Chapter 8 Flow in Pipes. Piping Systems and Pump Selection

12d Model. Civil and Surveying Software. Drainage Analysis Module Hydraulics. Owen Thornton BE (Mech), 12d Model Programmer.

When water (fluid) flows in a pipe, for example from point A to point B, pressure drop will occur due to the energy losses (major and minor losses).

CONVECTIVE HEAT TRANSFER CHARACTERISTICS OF NANOFLUIDS. Convective heat transfer analysis of nanofluid flowing inside a

( x) f = where P and Q are polynomials.

8.3 Design of Base Plate for Thickness

Chapter 6 Reliability-based design and code developments

RESOLUTION MEPC.147(54) Adopted on 24 March 2006 GUIDELINES ON THE ASSESSMENT OF RESIDUAL FILLET WELD BETWEEN DECK PLATING AND LONGITUDINALS

Definition: Let f(x) be a function of one variable with continuous derivatives of all orders at a the point x 0, then the series.

FLUID MECHANICS. Lecture 7 Exact solutions

Controlling the Heat Flux Distribution by Changing the Thickness of Heated Wall

NEWTONS LAWS OF MOTION AND FRICTIONS STRAIGHT LINES

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Solution by Quadrature-1

Fs (30.0 N)(50.0 m) The magnitude of the force that the shopper exerts is f 48.0 N cos 29.0 cos 29.0 b. The work done by the pushing force F is

Module 27: Rigid Body Dynamics: Rotation and Translation about a Fixed Axis

RELIABILITY OF BURIED PIPELINES WITH CORROSION DEFECTS UNDER VARYING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

CHAPTER 8 ANALYSIS OF AVERAGE SQUARED DIFFERENCE SURFACES

Hydraulic validation of the LHC cold mass heat exchanger tube.

Thu June 16 Lecture Notes: Lattice Exercises I

9.3 Graphing Functions by Plotting Points, The Domain and Range of Functions

Analysis of Non-Thermal Equilibrium in Porous Media

Feasibility of a Multi-Pass Thomson Scattering System with Confocal Spherical Mirrors

Reliability-Based Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Guidelines for Stiffened Panels and Grillages of Ship Structures

Chapter 11 Collision Theory

Part I: Thin Converging Lens

Pre-AP Physics Chapter 1 Notes Yockers JHS 2008

Basic mathematics of economic models. 3. Maximization

Filtration. Praktikum Mechanical Engineering. Spring semester ML F16 Tel.:

FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF HFC-134a IN AN ADIABATIC HELICAL CAPILLARY TUBE

COMPARISON OF THERMAL CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN THE PLATE-FIN AND PIN-FIN HEAT SINKS IN NATURAL CONVECTION

TRANSIENT SIMULATION OF LIQUID ROCKET ENGINES: A STEP TOWARDS A MORE EDUCATED PROPELLANT CHOICE BETWEEN KEROSENE AND METHANE.

3. Several Random Variables

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 83 (2015 ) Václav Dvo ák a *, Tomáš Vít a

12d Model. Civil and Surveying Software. Version 7. Drainage Analysis Module Hydraulics. Owen Thornton BE (Mech), 12d Model Programmer

Bayesian Technique for Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Failure Model

Physics 11 HW #6 Solutions

Longitudinal Strength Standard for Container Ships

Transport Properties: Momentum Transport, Viscosity

CEE 3310 Open Channel Flow,, Nov. 18,

Curve Sketching. The process of curve sketching can be performed in the following steps:

Pulling by Pushing, Slip with Infinite Friction, and Perfectly Rough Surfaces

APPENDIX 1 ERROR ESTIMATION

Fatigue verification of high loaded bolts of a rocket combustion chamber.

Open Access Dynamic Parameters Identification for the Feeding System of Commercial Numerical Control Machine

Chapter 8 Conservation of Energy and Potential Energy

ScienceDirect. Heat transfer and fluid transport of supercritical CO 2 in enhanced geothermal system with local thermal non-equilibrium model

Channel Structure Influence on the Thermal-Hydraulic Performance of. Zigzag PCHE

FOCUS ON CONCEPTS Section 7.1 The Impulse Momentum Theorem

Conservation of Mechanical Energy 8.01

OE4625 Dredge Pumps and Slurry Transport. Vaclav Matousek October 13, 2004

Capstan Law Motion Planning in Funicular Railways

Supplementary material for Continuous-action planning for discounted infinite-horizon nonlinear optimal control with Lipschitz values

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA CRUZ DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS PHYS 112. Homework #4. Benjamin Stahl. February 2, 2015

Wind-Driven Circulation: Stommel s gyre & Sverdrup s balance

Numerical calculation of the electron mobility in ZnS and ZnSe semiconductors using the iterative method

Urgent Rule Change Notice 1 to 01 JAN 2015 version

Estimation of Sample Reactivity Worth with Differential Operator Sampling Method

Kuldeep Rawat*, Ayushman Srivastav* *Assistant Professor, Shivalik College of Engineering, Dehradun.

3.5 Analysis of Members under Flexure (Part IV)

AH 2700A. Attenuator Pair Ratio for C vs Frequency. Option-E 50 Hz-20 khz Ultra-precision Capacitance/Loss Bridge

PROBLEM SET 1 (Solutions) (MACROECONOMICS cl. 15)

Roberto s Notes on Differential Calculus Chapter 8: Graphical analysis Section 1. Extreme points

3D Numerical Modelling of Convective Heat Transfer through Two-sided Vertical Channel Symmetrically Filled with Metal Foams

Review D: Potential Energy and the Conservation of Mechanical Energy

Web Appendix for The Value of Switching Costs

ME 328 Machine Design Vibration handout (vibrations is not covered in text)

774. Tribological adhesion of particles in acoustic field

HYDROELASTIC TAILORING AND OPTIMIZATION OF A COMPOSITE MARINE PROPELLER

sensors ISSN

TFY4102 Exam Fall 2015

Chapter (3) Motion. in One. Dimension

Physics 121. Tuesday, February 19, Physics 121. Tuesday, February 19, Physics 121. Course announcements. Topics:

The Effect of Internal Obstructions in Naturally Ventilated Greenhouse Applications

Second Order Slip Flow of Cu-Water Nanofluid Over a Stretching Sheet With Heat Transfer

Introduction. Methods of vibration control

NUMERICAL STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF INCLINATION ANGLE ON HEAT TRANSFER PERFORMANCE IN BACK-WARD FACING STEP UTILIZING NANOFLUID

Scattering of Solitons of Modified KdV Equation with Self-consistent Sources

Non-newtonian Rabinowitsch Fluid Effects on the Lubrication Performances of Sine Film Thrust Bearings

Analytical expressions for field astigmatism in decentered two mirror telescopes and application to the collimation of the ESO VLT

between electron energy levels. Using the spectrum of electron energy (1) and the law of energy-momentum conservation for photon absorption:

Manometer tubes for monitoring coastal water levels: New frequency response factors

Heat-fluid Coupling Simulation of Wet Friction Clutch

Design criteria for Fiber Reinforced Rubber Bearings

Earlier Lecture. We studied the effect of the heat exchanger effectiveness ε on the performance of a Linde Hampson system. max

Chapter 8 Laminar Flows with Dependence on One Dimension

THE EFFECT OF THERMAL RADIATION ON THE DYNAMICS OF FLASHOVER IN A COMPARTMENT FIRE

9.1 The Square Root Function

Analysis of Friction-Induced Vibration Leading to Eek Noise in a Dry Friction Clutch. Abstract

Numerical Methods - Lecture 2. Numerical Methods. Lecture 2. Analysis of errors in numerical methods

OBSERVER/KALMAN AND SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION OF THE UBC BENCHMARK STRUCTURAL MODEL

Heat transfer studies for a crystal in a synchrotron radiation beamline

Comments on Magnetohydrodynamic Unsteady Flow of A Non- Newtonian Fluid Through A Porous Medium

Resistance in Open Channel Hydraulics

Potential Energy of a Battery

Investigation of Initial Fouling Rates of Calcium Sulfate Solutions under Non-Boiling Conditions (Work-in-Progress)

Transcription:

(Adopted on 4 June 203)

(Adopted on 4 June 203) ANNEX 8 (Adopted on 4 June 203) MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE, RECALLING Article 28(b) o the Convention on the International Maritime Organization concerning the unctions o the Committee, RECALLING ALSO resolution A.266(VIII), by which the Assembly, at its eighth session, adopted the Recommendation on a standard method or establishing compliance with the requirements or cross-looding arrangements in passenger ships, RECALLING FURTHER resolution MSC.245(83), by which it, at its eighty-third session, adopted the Recommendation on a standard method or evaluating cross-looding arrangements, NOTING that the above Recommendation on a standard method or evaluating cross-looding arrangements needed to be revised and improved, based on recent research results regarding cross-looding, RECOGNIZING the need to establish a methodology or evaluating cross-looding arrangements on ships subject to the applicable subdivision and damage stability requirements o SOLAS chapter II- to ensure uniorm treatment o cross-looding and equalization arrangements, HAVING CONSIDERED, at its ninety-second session, the Revised Recommendation on a standard method or evaluating cross-looding arrangements, prepared by the Sub-Committee on Stability and Load Lines and on Fishing Vessels Saety, at its ity-ith session,. ADOPTS the Revised Recommendation on a standard method or evaluating cross-looding arrangements, the text o which is set out in the annex to the present resolution; 2. INVITES Governments to apply the annexed Revised Recommendation to ships constructed on or ater 4 June 203 and to bring it to the attention o all parties concerned; 3. NOTES that calculations to evaluate cross-looding arrangements perormed beore 4 June 203 remain valid. * * * I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 2 (Adopted on 4 June 203) ANNEX Table o contents Deinitions 2 Formulae 3 Air pipe venting criteria 4 Alternatives Appendix Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Examples or treatment o heel angles and water heads at dierent stages o cross-looding Friction coeicients in cross-looding arrangements Example using igures or a passenger ship I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

Deinitions (Adopted on 4 June 203) : Sum o riction coeicients in the considered cross-looding arrangement. MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 3 s (m 2 ): Cross-section area o the cross-looding pipe or duct. I the cross-section area is not circular, then: where: D equiv = 4. A p A = actual cross-section area p = actual cross-section perimeter : Angle beore commencement o cross-looding. The cross-looding device may be assumed to be ull or empty dependent on its arrangement and internal volume (see igure (b) in appendix ). : Heel angle at inal equilibrium ( ). : Any angle o heel between the commencement o cross-looding and the inal equilibrium at a given time. : Volume o water which is used to bring the ship rom commencement o cross-looding to inal equilibrium. : Volume o water which is used to bring the ship rom any angle o heel to the inal equilibrium. : Head o water beore commencement o cross-looding, with the same assumption as or. : Head o water when any angle o heel is achieved. : Final head o water ater cross-looding (, when the level inside the equalizing compartment is equal to the ree level o the sea). g (m/s 2 ): The acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s 2 ). 2 Formulae 2. Time required rom commencement o cross-looding to the inal equilibrium : T 2W S F 2gH 0 h H 0 I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 4 (Adopted on 4 June 203) 2.2 Time required to bring the ship rom any angle o heel to the inal equilibrium : T 2W S F 2gH h H 2.3 Time required rom commencement o cross-looding until any angle o heel is achieved: 2.4 Dimensionless actor o reduction o speed through an equalization device, being a unction o bends, valves, etc. in the cross-looding system: F ( k i ) Values or k can be obtained rom appendix 2 or other appropriate sources such as computational luid dynamics (CFD) or model testing. I other appropriate sources are used, then the + actor in the ormulae may not be appropriate. CFD can also be used to evaluate the discharge coeicient or the whole cross-looding duct. 2.5 Cross-looding through successive devices o dierent cross-section: I the same low crosses successive looding devices o cross-section S, S 2, S 3 having corresponding riction coeicients k, k 2, k 3, then the total k coeicient reerred to S is: 2.6 I dierent looding devices are not crossed by the same volume, each k coeicient should be multiplied by the square o the ratio o the volume crossing the device and the volume crossing the reerence section (which will be used or the time calculation): 2.7 For cross-looding through devices in parallel that lead to the same space, equalization time should be calculated assuming that: With F ( or each device o cross-section S i ) k i I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

3 Air pipe venting criteria (Adopted on 4 June 203) MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 5 3. In arrangements where the total air pipe sectional area is 0 per cent or more o the cross-looding sectional area, the restrictive eect o any air back pressure may be neglected in the cross-looding calculations. The air pipe sectional area should be taken as the minimum or the net sectional area o any automatic closing devices, i that is less. 3.2 In arrangements where the total air pipe sectional area is less than 0 per cent o the cross-looding sectional area, the restrictive eect o air back pressure should be considered in the cross-looding calculations. The ollowing method may be used or this purpose: The k coeicient used in the calculation o cross-looding time should take into account the drop o head in the air pipe. This can be done using an equivalent coeicient k e, which is calculated according to the ollowing ormula: where: k w = k coeicient or the cross-looding arrangement (water) k a = k coeicient or the air pipe ρ a = air density ρ w = water density S w = cross-section area o the cross-looding device (water) S a = cross-section o air pipe 4 Alternatives As an alternative to the provisions in sections 2 and 3, and or arrangements other than those shown in appendix 2, direct calculation using computational luid dynamics (CFD), time-domain simulations or model testing may also be used. * * * I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 6 (Adopted on 4 June 203) Appendix EXAMPLES FOR TREATMENT OF HEEL ANGLES AND WATER HEADS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF CROSS-FLOODING Upper Deck Intact waterline Main Deck Location o damage cross-looding pipe Equalizing Compartment Flooded Compartments Figure (a) Section showing cross-looding pipe and compartments I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

(Adopted on 4 June 203) MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 7 Beore cross-looding h H Intact Waterline Final Equilibrium 0 H 0 Figure (b) Initial and Final stages o cross-looding Note: H 0 on the let side o igure (b) depicts the head o water i the cross-looding device was assumed ull whereas H 0 on the right side o igure (b) shows the head o water i the cross-looding device was assumed empty.. Any transient angle o heel between 0 and W = Volume o water to bring the ship rom to H Water inlow at Figure (c) Situation at any transient angle o heel, * * * I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 8 (Adopted on 4 June 203) W = Volume o water to bring the ship rom to Final Equilibrium h Water inlow until inal equilibrium is achieved Figure (d) Situation at inal equilibrium * * * I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

(Adopted on 4 June 203) Appendix 2 FRICTION COEFFICIENTS IN CROSS-FLOODING ARRANGEMENTS MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 9 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 FIGURE 4 FIGURE 5 FIGURE 6 FIGURE 7 FIGURE 8 FIGURE 9 FIGURE 0 FIGURE I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 0 (Adopted on 4 June 203) where: 0.9 k 0.678 L i (0 L i 2) k.903 (2 L ) 0 i k Li riction coeicient related to each space between two adjacent girders Length o the duct in meters Note: k is evaluated with eective cross-section area thereore in calculations use the real cross-section area A and not S equiv. The pressure loss or entrance in the irst manhole is already computed in the calculation. Figure 2 I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

(Adopted on 4 June 203) MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page where: 0.026 k.7968 L i (0 L i 2) k.684 (2 L ) i k Li riction coeicient related to each space between two adjacent girders Length o the duct in meters Note: k is evaluated with eective cross-section area thereore in calculations use the real cross-section area A and not S equiv. The pressure loss or entrance in the irst manhole is already computed in the calculation. * * * I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 2 (Adopted on 4 June 203) Appendix 3 EXAMPLE USING FIGURES FOR A PASSENGER SHIP Dimension o the considered cross-looding pipe: Diameter Length Cross-section area Wall thickness D = 0.39 m l = 2.0 m S = 0.2 m2 t = 7.5 mm k-values or the considered cross-looding system: Inlet 0.45 Pipe riction ( 02 l D ).08 2 radius bends (α = 45 ) 0.36 Non-return valve 0.50 Suicient air venting is assumed to be in place. From this ollows: F F 0. 54 ( ) 3.39 k i Time required rom commencement o cross-looding to the inal equilibrium condition : T 2W. S F 2gH 0 h H 0 Head o water beore commencement o cross-looding: Volume o water which is used to bring the ship rom commencement o cross-looding to the inal equilibrium condition: I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

(Adopted on 4 June 203) Final head o water ater cross-looding: MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page 3 h.5m T T 3 2 365m. 2 0.2m 0.54 72s 2 9.8m s 2 5.3m.5m 5.3m Calculation o any transient situation o cross-looding: The purpose is to ind the situation ater 600s. Assumed transient situation: Cross-looded volume: 265 m 3 Volume o water which is used to bring the vessel rom the transient situation to the inal equilibrium : W = 365 m 3 265 m 3 = 00 m 3 Corresponding head o water: H = 2.8 m Time required to bring the vessel rom any transient situation to the inal equilibrium condition: T 2W S F 2gH h H 200m3 T. 0.2m2 0.54 T = 240 s 2*9.8m / s2*2.8m.5 2.8 m m Time between commencement o cross-looding and assumed transient situation: T = T T = 72 s 240 s = 48 s As T is less than 600 s, urther transient situations with larger cross-looded volume may be calculated in the same way. On the reverse, i T was o more than 600 s, urther transient situation with smaller cross-looded volume may be calculated. Situation ater 600 s may be ound by successive iterations. *** I:\MSC\92\26-Add-.doc

(Adopted on 4 June 203)