Status of the PREX Experiment R n through PVeS at JLab

Similar documents
The Lead Radius Experiment PREX. Dustin McNulty Idaho State University for the PREx Collaboration July 28, 2011

PREX Overview Extracting the Neutron Radius from 208 Pb

PREX and CREX. R N from Electroweak Asymmetry in Elastic Electron-Nucleus Scattering. Neutron Skin.

Parity-Violating Measurements of the Weak Charge of. Pb (PREX) & Ca (CREX) . and possible future measurements. R. Michaels, ICNT / MSU, Aug /26

Applications of Parity Violation

C-REX : Parity-Violating Measurement of the Weak Charge of

The neutron skin in neutronrich nuclei at Jefferson Lab

Parity Violating Electron Scattering at Jefferson Lab. Rakitha S. Beminiwattha Syracuse University

Neutron stars at JLAB and the Pb Radius Experiment

PREX / CREX Status. Jan 25, 2018 Bob Michaels, on behalf of the PREX collaboration. docdb

A Precision Measurement of Elastic e+p Beam Normal Single Spin Asymmetry and Other Transverse Spin Measurements from Qweak

E05-009:HAPPEx-III Status Report. Dustin McNulty UMass December 5, 2008

Neutron skin measurements and its constraints for neutron matter. C. J. Horowitz, Indiana University INT, Seattle, 2016

Parity-Violating Asymmetry for 208 Pb

Qweak Transverse Asymmetry Measurements

The Jefferson Lab 12 GeV Program

Acknowledgements: D. Armstrong, M. Dalton, K. Paschke, J. Mammei, M. Pitt, B. Waidyawansa and all my theory colleagues

Parity-violating Electron Scattering and Strangeness in the Nucleon: Results from HAPPEX-II

Electroweak Measurements of Neutron Densities in CREX and PREX at JLab, USA

Møller Polarimetry for PV Experiments at 12 GeV

Measurement of Nucleon Strange Form Factors at High Q 2

Møller Polarimetry for PV Experiments at 12 GeV

1 Introduction. THE Q W eak EXPERIMENT: A SEARCH FOR NEW PHYSICS AT THE TeV SCALE. W. Deconinck 1, for the Q W eak Collaboration

The P2 Experiment at MESA

Electron Beam Polarimetry at JLab

Parity Violation Experiments

Measurement of the neutron skin of heavy nuclei. G. M. Urciuoli INFN Sezione di Roma

Beam Polarimetry (for Future Experiments at JLab)

P.M. King Ohio University for the MOLLER Collaboration

Parity Radius Experiment and Neutron Densities. C. J. Horowitz Indiana University RIA INT Workshop, Sep. 2007

Parity Violation Experiments & Beam Requirements

Electron Beam Polarimetry: Status and Prospects. DIS 2005, Madison, April 2005 E. Chudakov (JLab)

The MOLLER experiment - testing the Standard Model at Jefferson Lab

Electron Beam Polarimetry at JLab Hall C Dave Gaskell PST 2009 September 7, 2009

Electron Beam Polarimetry at Jefferson Lab Dave Gaskell Jefferson Lab (Hall C)

PoS(Bormio 2013)024. P2 - The weak charge of the proton. D. Becker, K. Gerz. S. Baunack, K. Kumar, F. E. Maas

DIS-Parity: Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Parity NonConserving Deep Inelastic Scattering

Photopion photoproduction and neutron radii

Lead ( Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 15 Apr 2016

Building a Tracking Detector for the P2 Experiment

Density Dependence of Parity Violation in Electron Quasi-elastic Scattering

Recent results and future direction of the parity-violating electron scattering program in Hall A at Jefferson Lab

Nuclear Physics with Electromagnetic Probes

Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors: Introduction and Overview

E : Ratio of the electric form factor in the mirror nuclei 3 He and 3 H (The 3 He 3 H Charge Radius Difference)

Neutron skins of nuclei vs neutron star deformability

Hall A Compton Calorimeter G. B. Franklin Carnegie Mellon University

Beam Instrumentation Challenges for Parity-Violation Experiments

Low-Energy Accelerators for High Precision Measurements Sebastian Baunack

E (GMp) Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Cross Section at High Q 2. Thir Gautam Hampton University

GMp Experiment (E ): An update

Global properties of atomic nuclei

Møller Polarimetry on Atomic Hydrogen

Coulomb Sum Rule. Huan Yao Feb 16,2010. Physics Experiment Data Analysis Summary Collaboration APS April Meeting

Min Huang Duke University, TUNL On behalf of the E (g2p) collaboration

Min Huang Duke University, TUNL For the Jefferson Lab Hall A E (g2p) collaboration

The Electric Form Factor of the Neutron for SBS

The Qweak experiment: a precision measurement of the proton s weak charge

2. Hadronic Form Factors

Applications of Parity Violation

Aspects of The Standard Model and Beyond

Hunting for Quarks. G n M Co-conspirators: Jerry Gilfoyle for the CLAS Collaboration University of Richmond

Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Electroweak Tests of the Standard Model. Willem T.H. van Oers UCN Workshop at RCNP April 8 9, 2010

Status report on parity violation in the (1232) resonance

Toward 0.5% Electron Beam Polarimetry. Kent Paschke University of Virginia

Jefferson Lab 12 GeV Science Program

Coherent and incoherent nuclear pion photoproduction

APEX: Goals and Strategy

Search for Gluonic Excitations with GlueX at Jefferson Lab

Measuring Form Factors and Structure Functions With CLAS

Project P2 - The weak charge of the proton

Polarimetry in Hall A

Hadron Physics with Real and Virtual Photons at JLab

Simulation for Proton Charge Radius (PRad) Experiment at Jefferson Lab1 Li Ye Mississippi State University For the PRad Collaboration The Proton Charg

MOLLER Experiment. Many slides courtesy of K. Kumar, K. Paschke, J. Mammei, M. Dalton, etc.

Paul Huffman! Investigating Hadronic Parity Violation Using the γd np Reaction at the Proposed HIGS2 facility at TUNL

The QWeak Experiment: A measurement of the proton weak charge and up-down quark weak couplings.

Spin Physics in Jefferson Lab s Hall C

Studying Nuclear Structure

The Jlab 12 GeV Upgrade

M.Battaglieri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Genova - Italy. A Forward Photon Tagging Facility for CLAS12

Probing the Nuclear Symmetry Energy and Neutron Skin from Collective Excitations. N. Paar

Strange Electromagnetic and Axial Nucleon Form Factors

The low Q 2 chicane and Compton polarimeter at the JLab EIC

Parity Violating Measurements of Neutron Densities: Implications for Neutron Stars. C. J. Horowitz

The Electromagnetic Form Factors of the Nucleon

Neutral Pion Photoproduction in the Threshold Region

Cross section measurements of the elastic electron - deuteron scattering

Møller Polarimetry in Hall A and Beyond

Progress Report on the A4 Compton Backscattering Polarimeter

Status of the PRad Experiment (E )

Compton Scattering from Light Nuclei at MAX-lab. Luke Myers Collaboration

Spin Structure of the Nucleon: quark spin dependence

Sta$s$cs, Systema$cs and Run Phases

R. P. Redwine. Bates Linear Accelerator Center Laboratory for Nuclear Science Department of Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Correlating the density dependence of the symmetry y energy to neutron skins and neutron-star properties

Proton Radius Puzzle and the PRad Experiment at JLab

Searching for at Jefferson Lab. Holly Szumila-Vance On behalf of the HPS, APEX, DarkLight, and BDX 2017 JLab User s Group Meeting 20 June 2017

Parity Violation in Diatomic Molecules

Transcription:

Status of the PREX Experiment R n through PVeS at JLab Seamus Riordan University of Massachusetts, Amherst sriordan@physics.umass.edu for the PREX Collaboration June 18, 2011 Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 1/31

Outline Motivation Parity at JLab PREX and Results Future Plans Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 2/31

Nucleon Radii in Heavy Nuclei Measurements are important to understanding the strong nuclear force Calculations are difficult due to non-pqcd regime complicated by many-body physics Interesting for Fundamental nuclear structure Isospin dependence and nuclear symmetry Dense nuclear matter and neutron stars Proton radius is relatively easy - electromagnetic probes Neutron radius is difficult Weakly couples to electroweak probes Hadronic probes have considerable uncertainty Theory has range of R n R p for Pb of 0 0.4 fm Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 3/31

What do we learn from R n? What do we learn from R n? Constraints on EOS and symmetry energy B. Alex Brown, PRL 85, 5296 (2000) Slope of EOS can be used to constrain potential models Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 4/31

Neutron Stars A. W. Steiner et al., Phys Rep 411, 325 (2005) Neutron star structure is also better understood with measurements on R n Larger R n correlates with larger pressure Additionally, symmetry energy governs proton fraction Direct Urca cooling depends on processes n p + e + ν e + p n + ν Larger symmetry energy gives larger proton fraction, need 11% Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 5/31

How do we measure? Methods used to extract R n Hadronic Probes Elastic pn, pn, nn, π ± N π 0 photoproduction (Kruche, et al.) GDR Antiproton scattering Have theoretical uncertainty Electroweak Probes Parity violating electron scattering Atomic parity violation Clean measurements, fewer systematics Technically challenging Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 6/31

Non-Parity Violating Electron Scattering Electron scattering γ exchange provides R p through nucleus FFs, spin 0: dσ dω = α2 cos 2 θ 2 4E 2 sin 4 θ F 2 (Q 2 ) 2 q [fm 1 ] Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 7/31

Non-Parity Violating Electron Scattering Electron scattering γ exchange provides R p through nucleus FFs, spin 0: dσ dω = α2 cos 2 θ 2 4E 2 sin 4 θ F 2 (Q 2 ) 2 In limit of small Q 2 F (Q 2 ) F (0) + df dq 2 +... = ρ( x)d 3 x 1 Q 2 =0 6 Q2 rcharge 2 So small Q 2 measurements give RMS radius (R n/p ) Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 7/31

Parity Violating Electron Scattering e also exchange Z, which is parity violating Primarily couples to neutron: Q proton weak 1 4 sin 2 θ W 0.076, Qweak neutron 1 Detectable in parity violating asymmetry of electrons with different helicity In Born approximation, Q 2 MZ 2, from γ Z interference: A PV = σ+ σ σ + + σ = G F Q 2 [ 4πα 1 4 sin 2 θ W F n(q 2 ] ) 2 F p (Q 2 ) For fixed target exp., typical A PV 10 8 10 4 Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 8/31

Extraction A PV Polarization Backgrounds Coulomb Distortions Neutron ρ R n G n E MEC G s E Weak Density PV experiments are challenging for several reasons: Asymmetries are small, need lots of statistics Important control of systematics e polarimetry ( 1%) Good understanding and control of beam parameters Q 2 must be accurately known ( 1%) Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 9/31

Parity Violation at JLab Jefferson Lab is an excellent facility for such measurements Two RF superconducting linacs - E e = 1 6 GeV High quality polarized beam, P e 85 90% PV expts. need quiet beam parameters over helicity windows: x < 10 µm x < 2 µrad E < 10 3 Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 10/31

Typical Experiment Stolen from R. Michaels Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 11/31

Parity Violation at JLab Experimental History Completed G 0, HAPPEX - G s E,G s M in proton, 4 He PVDIS PREX - R n in 208 Pb Running Qweak - proton weak charge (1 sin 2 θ W ) from elastic ep Proposed PVDIS SoLID - large acceptance PVDIS Moller - sin 2 θ W from ee Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 12/31

PREX PREX measures R n of 208 Pb Lead is nice because Excess of neutrons Doubly-magic nucleus Nearest excited state 2.6 MeV from elastic Ran in Spring 2010 (approved 30 PAC days) E e = 1.063 GeV, θ e 5, Q 2 0.009 GeV 2 I e 50 75 µa Expected uncertainty on A PV of 3%, R n 1% Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 13/31

PREX Layout Experimental Layout Standard Hall A HRS spectrometers Detector huts well shielded against backgrounds Run dual arms - cancels out transverse asymmetry, addnl systematics Septum magnet bends 5 to 12.5 Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 14/31

PREX Layout Inelastic Elastic PREX Optics Schematic VDCs Quartz Q3 Target Septum Q1 Q2 Dipole Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 14/31

PREX Equipment Several pieces of instrumentation were important Upgrades in polarimetry Non-invasive Compton, 1% Invasive Moller, 1% Pb/D targets Quartz Cerenkov detectors Integrating ADCs Beamline monitoring components Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 15/31

Lead/Diamond Targets 0.15 mm thick diamond, 0.5 mm thick Pb Cryogenically cooled frame (30 W) Beam is rastered by two fast magnets upstream to diffuse beam on surface Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 16/31

Data Quality and Analysis All asymmetries are blinded approximately 1σ Widths are determined by statistics of photo-electrons, changes in beam parameters, etc. Integrated helicity pair-wise asymmetries are corrected for beam fluctuations Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 17/31

Modulation Correction Modulation corrections provide narrower asymmetry widths (σ 180 ppm, I = 75 µa) Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 18/31

Experiment Issues Several issues prevented full experimental program Large amounts of radiation were dumped in the experimental hall damaging electronics Mistune of septum field - loss of some small angle statistics Destruction of scattering chamber rubber O-rings Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 19/31

Experiment Issues - Target Targets were destroyed over periods of time by beam Loss of material 10% Thicker diamond targets were more successful - Lasted 4 days at 70 µa Thickest diamond contributes 8% background - manageable Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 20/31

Data Quality Measured asymmetries relatively stable over run Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 21/31

Data Quality - Helicity Reversal Slow helicity reversal with HWP and double-wien successful in controlling systematics Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 22/31

Backgrounds Inelastic Pb and C12 excitations C12 elastic Rescattering within the spectrometer Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 23/31

Results Set 95% CL on existence of neutron skin R n R p = 0.34 + 0.15 0.17 fm Each model neutron density is folded into numerical solution of Dirac eqn with Coulomb and weak axial potential Full acceptance (apertures, septum propagation, detectors) applied to A PV PRL forthcoming Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 24/31

Results Set 95% CL on existence of neutron skin R n R p = 0.34 + 0.15 0.17 fm Each model neutron density is folded into numerical solution of Dirac eqn with Coulomb and weak axial potential Full acceptance (apertures, septum propagation, detectors) applied to A PV PRL forthcoming Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 24/31

Result and Error Budget A PV = 0.6571 ± 0.0604 ± 0.0130 ppm ± 9.22% (stat) ± 1.98% (sys) abs (ppm) rel (%) Polarization 0.0071 1.1 Detector Lin. 0.0071 1.1 Beam Corrections 0.0072 1.1 Q 2 0.0028 0.4 12 C Asymmetry 0.0025 0.4 Transverse Pol. 0.0012 0.2 BCM Lin. 0.0010 0.1 Target Thick 0.0006 0.1 Rescattering 0.0001 0.0 Inelastic Cont. 0.0000 0.0 Systematic of 2% achieved! Completely statistics dominated Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 25/31

Future Plans New proposal to complete measurements to be submitted to August PAC Measurement of A PV to 3% (combined with PREX-I) with 35 days Several improvements to prior experiment Improved metal O-rings Additional radiation mitigation Must run at start of 12 GeV commissioning - 2014? Separate proposal for similar measurement on 48 Ca likely in future Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 26/31

Summary PREX experiment ran Spring 2010 to measure R n on 208 Pb Established existence of neutron skin with 95% CL despite experimental difficulties PREX-II proposal to be considered by PAC in upcoming months Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 27/31

Target Degradation Thicker diamond targets were more successful Lasted 4 days at 70 mua Thickest diamond contributes 8% background - manageable Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 28/31

Optics and Q 2 Measurements Q 2 fixed by elastic scattering of H 2 O target Don t use integrating detectors - do tracking through HRS VDCs Sieve placed between target and quad aperture for angular reconstruction over whole acceptance Q 2 determined to about 1.0% Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 29/31

Compton Polarimetry Non-invasive polarization monitoring Upgraded from infrared to green laser, total power increase by 2. Allows running at lower beam energies (E e = 1 GeV) Polarization uncertainty 1% at E e = 1 GeV Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 30/31

Möller Polarimetery Invasive polarization measurements Upgrade to DAQ to reduce deadtime systematics Brute force increase in Fe foil pol. by 3 4 T superconducting solenoid Abs. systematic uncertainty from 2 3% to 1.1% Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX 31/31