Geo-imaging: An Introduction to Engineering Geophysics

Similar documents
Geophysical Site Investigation (Seismic methods) Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

Site Characterization & Hydrogeophysics

LECTURE 10. Module 3 : Field Tests in Rock 3.6 GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION

Geophysics for Environmental and Geotechnical Applications

Geotechnical / Geophysical Investigation

Geophysical mapping and imaging of soil structures: basic overview

Mechanical Wave Measurements. Electromagnetic Wave Techniques. Geophysical Methods GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION. Mechanical Wave Geophysics

High Resolution Geophysics: A Better View of the Subsurface. By John Jansen, P.G., Ph.D., Aquifer Science and Technology

SEISMIC RADAR AND ELECTRICAL TECHNIQUES FOR WASTE DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT. M. Pipan, G. Dal Moro, E. Forte & M. Sugan

Site characterization at the Groundwater Remediation Field Laboratory

DOWN-HOLE SEISMIC SURVEY AND VERTICAL ELECTRIC SOUNDINGS RABASKA PROJECT, LÉVIS, QUÉBEC. Presented to :

Static Corrections for Seismic Reflection Surveys

INTRODUCTION TO APPLIED GEOPHYSICS

SEISMIC SURVEY METHODS

DEVELOPMENT OF EMPIRICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY AND STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE IN SOILS OF CHENNAI CITY

Instructional Objectives

FUNDAMENTALS OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY

CENTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING STUDIES

1. Resistivity of rocks

An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics

Geophysical Applications GPR Ground Penetrating Radar

Chapter 1 Introduction

A Comparison of Four Geophysical Methods for Determining the Shear Wave Velocity of Soils

PART A: Short-answer questions (50%; each worth 2%)

Seismoelectric Ground-flow DC-4500 Locator

Geophysics Course Interpreting DC Resistivity Data

GLE 594: An introduction to applied geophysics

Case Study: University of Connecticut (UConn) Landfill

NSE 3.7. SEG/Houston 2005 Annual Meeting 1121

Hamed Aber 1 : Islamic Azad University, Science and Research branch, Tehran, Iran. Mir Sattar Meshin chi asl 2 :

ERTH2020 Introduction to Geophysics The Seismic Method. 1. Basic Concepts in Seismology. 1.1 Seismic Wave Types

Beyond Rippability A Case History Integrating Seismic Refraction, Electrical Resistivity Imaging, and Geotechnical Boring Logs

Patterns in Geophysical Data and Models

3. Magnetic Methods / 62

Improved Exploration, Appraisal and Production Monitoring with Multi-Transient EM Solutions

An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration

Manual on Subsurface Investigations National Highway Institute Publication No. FHWA NHI Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC

MT Prospecting. Map Resistivity. Determine Formations. Determine Structure. Targeted Drilling

MOUNT POLLEY MINING CORPORATION TECHNICAL REPORT ON MULTI-ELECTRODE RESISTIVITY AND SEISMIC REFRACTION SURVEYS MOUNT POLLEY TAILINGS DAM PROJECT

Geophysics Course Introduction to DC Resistivity

Joint inversion of geophysical and hydrological data for improved subsurface characterization

Lesson 1 Introduction to geophysical methods Emanuele Forte

Hybrid Seismic Survey on the Gamanjunni Rockslide Site

Walkaway Seismic Experiments: Stewart Gulch, Boise, Idaho

EOS 350 MIDTERM OCT 4, 2013 STUDENT NAME: TEAM #:

UChile - LMMG Shear Wave Velocity (V S. ): Measurement, Uncertainty, and Utility in Seismic Hazard Analysis. Robb Eric S. Moss, Ph.D., P.E.

Downhole Seismic Velocity Logging Test

Optimum acquisition and processing parameters for multichannel analysis of surface waves using 3D electrical resistivity tomography as control

Electrical Surveying (part A)

CORRELATION BETWEEN GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL

Electrical Resistivity Survey for Delineating Seawater Intrusion in a Coastal Aquifer

INTRODUCTION TO LOGGING TOOLS

Magnetotelluric (MT) Method

FINAL REPORT GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION WATER TOWER NO. 6 SITE PLANT CITY, FL

University of Wyoming Near-Surface Geophysical Instrument Center & Wyoming Center for Environmental Hydrology and Geophysics

INTERROGATING LEVEES IN TEXAS, NEW MEXICO, AND NEW ORLEANS USING VARIOUS SEISMIC METHODS. Abstract

Geoelectricity. ieso 2010

Ultra high-resolution seismic and GPR imaging of permafrost. Devon Island, Nunavut

Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 53, No. 1, March, 2016 (Russian Original No. 1, January-February, 2016)

Geophysical techniques for investigating shallow and deep landslides: results in the framework of PREVIEW project (FP6 UE)

Oil and Gas Research Institute Seismic Analysis Center Faults Detection Using High-Resolution Seismic Reflection Techniques

SUBMITTAL FEASIBILITY STUDY GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION SAN JUAN BASIN SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA. GEOVision Project No

Comparison of geophysical. techniques to determine depth to. bedrock in complex weathered. environments of the Mount Crawford. region, South Australia

7.2.1 Seismic waves. Waves in a mass- spring system

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

Enhanced In-Situ Testing for Geotechnical Site Characterization. Graduate Course CEE 6423

Study on Rayleigh Wave Inversion for Estimating Shear-wave Velocity Profile

GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SUBSURFACE. Arindam Dey Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering IIT Guwahati

Department of Geophysics Faculty of Earth Sciences King Abdulaziz University

Sensors & Transducers 2015 by IFSA Publishing, S. L.

Lima Project: Seismic Refraction and Resistivity Survey. Alten du Plessis Global Geophysical

Hydrogeophysics - Seismics

Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics

Reflection Seismic Method

TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY (TDR) IN MEASURING WATER CONTENTS AND HYDRATE SATURATIONS IN MARINE SEDIMENTS

Seismic and geoelectrical field explorations for parameter estimation in geotechnics

Correlation Between P-wave Velocity and Strength Index for Shale to Predict Uniaxial Compressive Strength Value

Resistivity & IP methods

Chapter 7: Reflection Seismology Homework Solutions (Jan. 2010)

Hydrological geophysical relationships

Fr Reservoir Monitoring in Oil Sands Using a Permanent Cross-well System: Status and Results after 18 Months of Production

CROSSHOLE RADAR TOMOGRAPHY IN AN ALLUVIAL AQUIFER NEAR BOISE, IDAHO. Abstract. Introduction

Feasibility of MASW (Multi-Channel Analysis of Surface Waves) for Evaluating the Dynamic Properties of Geofoam

A scale/resolution problem

Groundwater Sustainability at Wadi Al Bih Dam, Ras El Khaimah, United Arab Emirates (UAE) using Geophysical methods

Lesson 2 Geophysical methods for rock mass characterization Emanuele Forte

Techniques for determining the structure and properties of permafrost

KARST MAPPING WITH GEOPHYSICS AT MYSTERY CAVE STATE PARK, MINNESOTA

Basim R. Hijab, Amer Al-Khalidy University of Baghdad, Department of Earth Science

ambiguity in earth sciences IESO Geophysics Section Eddy hartantyo, Lab Geofisika FMIPA UGM

3D Converted Wave Data Processing A case history

Vollständige Inversion seismischer Wellenfelder - Erderkundung im oberflächennahen Bereich

Downloaded 07/03/14 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Oak Ridge IFRC. Quantification of Plume-Scale Flow Architecture and Recharge Processes

Seismic applications in coalbed methane exploration and development

Geophysical Investigation of Ground Water Using Vertical Electrical Sounding and Seismic Refraction Methods

CHARACTERIZATION OF SOIL PROFILE OF DHAKA CITY USING ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY (ERT)

Surface and borehole electrical resistivity tomography

Improved Hydrogeophysical Parameter Estimation from Empirical Mode Decomposition Processed Ground Penetrating Radar Data

Transcription:

Geo-imaging: An Introduction to Engineering Geophysics Chih-Ping Lin Distinguished Professor, Department of Civil Engineering & Natural Hazard Mitigation Research Center National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan Ex. Considerations in landslide assessment Geological model and material properties Slip surface/geometry of the sliding block Detection and monitoring of slope movement

The Role of Geophysics Investigation of geological structure Measurement of related physical properties Geotechnical Testing Geophysical Methods Sampling SPT,CPT DMT, PMT VST Mechanical response Small sample volume Small coverage High spatial resolution 1D2D3D Non-destructive Complementary Seismic wave Electrical EM wave Physical properties Large sample volume Large coverage Low spatial resolution Geo-imaging methods Resistivity (ERT) P-wave velocity (Traveltime) Reflection S-wave velocity (Surface Wave)

Geophysics for Slope Stability (Hack 2000) Geophysics for Slope Stability (Bell et al. 2006)

Geophysics for Slope Stability (Jongmans & Garambois 2007) Part I Seismic Methods Seismic waves and properties Seismic methods Borehole seismic Down-hole Cross-hole Suspension Cross-hole Tomography Surface seismic Refraction Reflection Surface Wave Principle Applications Limitations Guideline

Seismic waves Surface waves Compressional waves Shear waves Body Wave in Layered Media 10

Seismic Wave Seismic wave properties Elastic modulus Young s modulus (E) Poisson s ratio () Shear modulus (G) Vs Constrained Vp modulus (M) Damping Viscous damping D Deformation Strength Dynamic

Seismic wave velocity saturated Seismic Properties P-wave velocity vs. Unconfined compressive strength (Ookubo and Terasaki, 1971)

Seismic wave velocity Seismic Properties (Hada, 1984)

Seismic Methods Borehole/Penetration Methods Down-hole Cross-hole Suspension Cross-hole Tomography Surface Methods Refraction Reflection Surface Wave Seismic Downhole Method 震源 震測儀 裸孔或 PVC 套管 孔內受波器 ASTM Standard: ASTM D7400-08 Standard Test Method for Downhole Seismic Testing

Borehole Seismic Borehole Seismic

Characteristics of Downhole Test Requires only one borehole Work in cased holes Less expensive Some space is required to place the source S/N decreases with increasing depth Spatial resolution also decreases with depth 21 Seismic Crosshole Method ASTM Standard: ASTM D4428 Standard Test Method for Crosshole Seismic Testing

Characteristics of Crosshole Test Most reliable Work in cased holes Accuracy and resolution does not decrease with increasing depth Requires at least 2 boreholes Borehole distance < 9 m Borehole deviation 23 Suspension PS-Logger Suspension 0 H1 0 H2 10 10 20 20 30 30 40 40 Depth (m) 50 60 Depth (m) 50 60 70 70 80 80 90 100 110 2 4 6 Time (ms) 90 100 110 2 4 6 Time (ms) Limitations: - Casing? - water required - V Sensitivity

Characteristics of PS Logging Fast Accuracy and resolution does not decrease with increasing depth Water-filled borehole required Results may be affected by casing Receiver spacing is short (1 m) Cross-hole Tomography

Surface Seismic Methods 1 2 N-1 N x 1 dx :Source :Receiver x 1 :Near offset L dx:receiver interval L :Receiver spread Seismic Equipment 28

Seismic Refraction Method Snell s Law i r V 1 t V 2 29 Determining Earth Structure From Travel Time Curve Low Velocity Over High Velocity Halfspace

Refraction Method Multiple Subsurface Model Refraction Method Hidden Layers Low Velocity Layer

Thin, large velocity contrast layer Interpretation of Dipping Layers

More General Interpretation -The Reciprocal Method Depth term: t 0 =T AP +T BP -T AB Velocity term: T AP -t 0 /2 = 1/2T AB -1/2(T AP -T BP ) t 0 /2 t 0 /2 Refraction Tomography

Refraction Method Surface+Borehole Traveltime Tomography (Optim, 2001) Planning of Survey Geophone spread and direction Geophone spread Investigation depth No. of Channel & Receiver interval 24 channel are the most common Tyically 5 meter for shallow & 10 m for deep Source location 7 points method 9 points method 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 source receiver / geophone 38 use 1/3 or ¼ line length

Refraction Method Data Acquisition Traveltime Curve Tomography Inversion 39 GRM Analysis Limitations of Seismic Refraction Depth: Typically < 30 m. Deeper depth requires explosives and long geophone spread Resolution: Typically resolve 3~4 layers, vertical resolution is limited by the accuracy of travel time (1 ms error induces ~1m depth error for surface layers and ~2-10 m for deeper layers) and depends on velocity contrast, lateral resolution = f (geophone spacing) Hidden layers Seismic velocity must increases with depth Will not detect thin layers Narrow shear zone with low velocity Lateral refraction in the horizontal plan Measurement sensitive to acoustic noise and vibration A source to geophone distance of 5 (or more) times the desired depth of investigation is needed

Seismic Reflection Method Principle Applications: Characterize geological structures Common Midpoint Survey Normal moveout correction Velocity Analysis Note: Before stacking, several data processing may be involved.

Walkaway noise test Survey Plan

Limitations of Seismic Reflection Depth: ten s m~ hundred s m Resolution: vertical resolution depends on wavelength (as good as 1m for 500 Hz), lateral resolution depends on geophone spacing (typically 0.3~3m) Operations are difficult in areas of steep topography or uneven surfaces. Measurements labor intensive, data processing complicated Measurement sensitive to acoustic noise and vibration Difficult to perform shallow depth (< 30 m) seismic reflection

Seismic Surface Wave Method Frequency component Geophones V S V S1 V S2 Time (s) 0 0.05 0.1 z V S3 V Inversion Dispersion curve f 0.15 0.2 0 10 20 Field Testing Dispersion analysis Dispersion of Rayleigh Wave

Surface Wave Methods Two-Station Method (SASW) Multi-Station Method (MASW) Surface Wave SASW Method x (rad) 20 10 0 Unwrapping in f domain V ph (m/s) 400 300 200 100 X=8 X=16 X=24 20 40 60 80 50 f (Hz) 0 50 100 f(hz) Low frequency important, esp. for large x v( f ) 2f ( f ) x

MASW Method 0 0.1 0 10 0 10 10 MWTSW MSASW 0.2 20 20 20 0.3 30 30 30 Time (s) 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 frequency (Hz) 40 50 60 70 Frequency (Hz) 40 50 60 70 Frequency, f (Hz) 40 50 60 70 0.8 80 80 80 0.9 90 90 90 1 20 30 40 Offset (m) 100 20 30 40 Offset (m) 100 0 0.5 1 R 2 100 200 400 Phase Velocity, v ph (m/s) k N 1 ( fi, v) n0 U ( f i, x n ) exp j 2f i v x n Surface Wave Tomography Surface Wave Methods Survey Line Data Acquisition National Chiao Tung Unversity

Limitations of Surface Wave Method It s basically a 1-D method Resolution and accuracy decreases with increasing depth Investigation depth is typically less than 30 m Inversion considering effect of multiple modes needs further study Part II Electrical/Electromagnetic methods Electrical Properties Electrical Methods Electromagnetic Wave Method Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) Electrical methods (Potential measurement) DC resistivity Spontaneous Potential Electromagnetic Induction Frequency Domain EM Time Domain EM Principle Applications Limitations Guideline

Electrical Properties Electrical Conductivity: dc EM wave Attenuation Dielectric Permittivity: r EM wave Velocity + O H - 105 0 (a) H - (b) E (c) Geo-electrical properties Type of geomaterial, water content, pore water properties, 55 Electrical Properties Electrical Properties Dielectric Permittivity r ( f ) r '( f ) jr ''( f ) Electrical Conductivity dc Equivalent Dielectric Permittivity * ' j r r ii r dc r ' j r " 2f 0 (Hilhorst, 1998)

Electrical vs. Geo Properties High-frequency dielectric permittivity is mainly a function of water content Dielectric dispersion is related to water content, soil density, and soil type Electrical conductivity is related to pore water characteristics, water content, soil density, and soil type Soil/Rock conditions vs. resistivity Conditions Changes of rock/soil resistivity Low High Remarks Resistivity of groundwater and pore water Low High Salinity, salt water wedge Degree of water saturation High Low Ground water Porosity (saturated) Large Small Clay fraction Many Few Soil type Degree of weathering and Strong Slight Strength alteration Temperature High Low Geothermal

Electrical Methods Borehole/Penetration Methods Time domain reflectometry (TDR) Down-hole resistivity/radar Cross-hole resistivity/radar tomography Surface Methods Ground penetration radar DC resistivity Self potential Frequency domain Electromagnetic Time domain electromagnetic TDR: Measurement of Electrical Properties TDR Step pulse generator v 0 Coaxial cable Sampler Waveguide V s /2 V f Apparent dielectric constant v 2L / T c / Ka Ka = f( r d ) Electrical conductivity EC=f( r d water EC) Lin et al. (2008&2009)

Water Content Measurement based on Ka sqrt(k a ) w / d K a 6 4 2 (Lin, 1999) Measured Linear Regression 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Volumetric Water Content 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Empirical Relation (Lin, 1999) R 2 = 0.932 y = 9.4273x + 0.9969 R 2 = 0.9688 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 w Topp's Equation Topp s equation 2 4 2 6 3 5.3 2.92 10 K a 5.510 K a 4.310 K a Refractive Index Linear K K a d a a ASTM D6780 w Equivalently, b c a bw Ka= f( r d soil type) d K a (Topp, 1980) (Ledieu et al., 1986) (Siddique and Drnevich, 1995) d a b Note: 0 and d 0, Ka=0 instead of 1 (air), But fit as good as Ledieu et al. (1986) for soils. w Borehole Radar 62 Limitations: - penetration distance

Cross-hole Radar Tomography Velocity Dielectric Constant Attenuation Conductivity (Jhou et al. 2001) Cross-hole Radar Mapping moisture content changes due to tracer input (Binley, 2004)

Ground Penetrating Radar Limitations: -Penetration depth -Velocity analysis -Reflection pattern Survey Type 66

25 MHz, up to 40 depth (Otto & Sass, 2006) DC Resistivity Method 1 Resistivity vs. Resistance 2 Single point current source in half space r P

A practical way of measuring resistivity I V K r r r r I V V p P a 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 Depth of current penetration vs. current electrode spacing DC Resistivity

Electrode Array (M.H. Loke., 2015) 71 Vertical Electrical Sounding Schlumberger and Wenner array are commonly used for sounding

Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) 2D Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) 74

Electrical Resistivity Tomography(ERT) 1D 2D 3D (Bichler et al. 2004) 76

DC Resistivity Time-lapse ERT Limitations of DC Resistivity Method Measurement susceptible, but less so than EM measurements, to interference from nearby metal objects Obtaining a good connection with the ground can sometimes be a problem Sensitivity (resolution) decreases significantly with increasing depth and depends on resistivity distribution

Borehole Resistivity 79 Cross-borehole ERT 80

Self-Potential Method Principle Applications: Investigation of subsurface water movement Electromagnetic Induction A suite of techniques to measure resistivity, complementary to DC resistivity method. Frequency Domain EM Time Domain EM Very Low Frequency (VLF) Pipe/cable locator Metal Detector

Geophysical logging Borehole caliper Velocity Density Resistivity Self Potential Natural Gamma Televiewer Hydrophysical Logging Optical/Acoustic Televiewer 84

Acoustic Televiewer Travel time Magnitude 東勢坑溪 Probe Acoustic televiewer measures: Acoustic travel time and reflection magnitude Sonde inclination and azimuth Optical Televiewer BOTV Camera LED 86

Televiewer data analysis Borehole deviation Breakout/ovalisation Log Structural/Fracture Analysis Borehole cross-section 87 Summary of Geophysical Methods Seismic waves and properties Seismic methods Borehole seismic Down-hole Cross-hole Suspension Cross-hole Tomography Surface seismic Refraction Reflection Surface Wave Electrical Properties Electrical Methods Electromagnetic Wave Method Time Domain Reflectometry Ground Penetration Radar Electrical methods (Potential measurement) DC resistivity Spontaneous Potential Electromagnetic Induction Frequency Domain EM Time Domain EM

Thank You! Chih-Ping Lin Distinguished Professor, Department of Civil Engineering & Natural Hazard Mitigation Research Center National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan