" " "The impact of Incentives on improving the performance of the Employees In the Public Sector institutions In Jordan" An Applied Study on the Greater Amman Municipality م 2013
ب
ج
د....
ه... " : (19 ) "....
و 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 5 6 8 8 8 10 :.1 1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1.2 1.2 1.1.2 2.1.2
ز 11 13 13 16 16 19 20 22 22 24 25 26 27 30 31 33 33 34 35 35 39 42 44 44 44 45 : : 3.1.2 4.1.2 5.1.2 6.1.2 7.1.2 8.1.2 9.1.2 2.2 1.2.2 2.2.2 3.2.2 4.2.2 5.2.2 6.2.2 7.2.2 3.2 1.3.2 2.3.2 4.2 1.4.2 2.4.2 3.4.2.3 1.3 2.3 3.3
ح 50 50 52 52 54 55 56 57 57 64 78 78 83 92 94 96 102 : : 4.3 5.3 6.3 7.3 8.3 9.3 10.3.4 1.4 2.4.5 1.5 2.5
ط 46 46 48 48 49 50 56 59 60 62 64 67 68 ) ( (1-3) (2-3) (3-3) (4-3) (5-3) (6-3) (7-3) (1-4) (2-4) (3-4) (4-4) (5-4) (6-4) (7-4)
ي 69 71 t (8-4) (9-4) 72 73 74 t (10-4) (11-4) (12-4) ) ( 65 76 77 Scheffee (13-4) (14-4) (15-4)
ك 15 18 53 81 84 (1-2) (2-2) (1-3) (1-5) (2-5)
ل 103 109 110 (1) (2) (3)
م. 150 449 %33. SPSS :. (1. (2 (3. (4. : ( ) (1. (2.
ن "The impact of Incentives on improving the performance of the Employees In the Public Sector institutions In Jordan" By Ghazi hasan odeh alhalaybeh Supervisor Prof Dr. Mohammed alnoaemi Abstract This study aimed to investigate the impact of incentives on improving the performance of the employees of Greater Amman Municipality. A Stratified random sample,which was chosen, consisted of 150 employees of managers, heads of departments and administrators in Greater Amman Municipality representing 33% of the population of the study which consisted of 449 employees. To achieve the objectives of the study, the analytical descriptive approach and SPSS were used. The results of the study were as follows: 1. The level of the financial and moral incentives was low. 2. The level of the social incentives and the performance was medium. 3. There was a strong linear correlation between using incentives and improving the performance of the Greater Amman Municipality s employees. 4. There were significant differences due to the sex variable in favor of males and to the job title variable in favor of head of department and to years of experience variable in favor of those who have little experience. And there were no significant differences attributed to the scientific qualification. In light of these results, the researcher recommended the following : 1. The necessity to support, enhance and guide the positive work relation between the employees( official and non official) an away that is consistent with the objectives of the Amman Municipality. 2. Strengthen the theme of team work as a moral motivation to get to the planned levels of performance.
1.1 : 1.1..(7 :2011 ).(2006 )
2 2000م). ) ) 2002 م). : 2.1 ( 2000 م) ( 2011 م). :
3 : 3.1 : :.1....2.3.4 ): ( : 4.1 :..1..2..3.4.
4 : 5.1 :..,. : 6.1 : ) : (HO1) (α 0.05 : ) :(1 : HO1).1. (α 0.05
5 ) :(2: HO1).2. (α 0.05 ) :(3: HO1).3. (α 0.05 ) :(HO2) (α 0.05 : :(1 : HO2).1. (α 0.05) :(2: HO2).2. (α 0.05) :(3: HO2).3. (α 0.05) :(4: HO2).4. (α 0.05) : : 7.1 :.1.
6 (449) :.2. :.3. 2012 م- 2013 : 8.1 : 2000م). ). ().. :.
7 :.(48 :2009 ) (). : 1955 29 : ).(1 2010
8.2 : : 1:2 : 1.1.2 :
9.(2005 ).(2009 ) :.(151 :2003 ) ":. (73 :2011 )..(14 :1990 ). (300 :2001 ) :2010 ). (25
10.(2009 ) 2.1.2 : :.1 ) (.(2011 ) :.2
11.(2011 ) :.3.(2011 ) : 3.1.2 : :.1 ( 2002 )
12.2 : ) :2002 137 ( -. -. -. -. -..3 : ) 2002.(.4 : ) :2002 138 (
13 : 4.1.2 :(Toshiba,2006:121).1..2...3.4..5. : :(279 :2000 ) : :.1 : -.
14 : -. :.2. :(50 :2003 ) :.1. :.2. :.3. :.4.. :.5. :
15. (1-2). :
16 : (1-2). 6.1.2 :(95 :1995 )..1..2..3..4..5..6..7 : 7.1.2 :(82 :2006 )
17 :.1. :.2. :.3 :(2000 ). :.4. :.5. :.6. :
18 تقدیر الجهود استقرار العمل الترقية إشراك العاملين إثراء العمل توسيع العمل (2-2) : (2-2).
19 : 8.1.2 : (62 :2000 )..1..2..3.4...5.6...7..8 :(2006 )..1..2..3..4..5
20.6..7..8..9. 9.1.2 : ). - - ).(2006 ) :2005 :(63.1 ).(.2..3.
21.4.. :.....
22. : 2.2 : 1.2.2.(2009)
23 ). (2000.(2004 ) ).(2005 ).(2003. (2000 ).(2003 ) :(2004 )
24.1 :..2 :..3 :..4 :. 2.2.2 ) :(2003.1 :..2 :..3 :.
25 :.4. 3.2.2 : :.1.(Gibbs,2004:42) :.2.(Kiyoshi,2006:223 )
26 :.3 :.(Gibbs,2004:43) 4.2.2.(15 :2003 ) : (69 :2003) :(1998 )
27.1..2...3.4...5..6 5.2.2 : : (1 ) :(22 :2010. :.1 :.2. :.3.
28 :.4. :.5. : (2 :(23 :2010 ).....1.2.3.4 : (3 :(90 :2003 ) : -
29 )..(93:2003 - : ).(942003 - : : :2003).(94 - : : ) :2003.(95 6.2.2 : :
30 (2010) : (Hackett,2002:208) : (1. : (2. : : (3. :(2008 ) : -. : -. : -. : 7.2.2 :2005 ) :(159
31.1..2..3..4..(53 :2002 ) :... (1 (2 (3
32.. (4 (5.. : 3.2 : 1.3.2 1909 م 1950 م
33 1987 1948 م ".(2010 ) " (68) (34) ( ) (34).( 2010 ) : ).(2010 :
34.(2009 ) 2.3.2.(2009 ) 4.2 الدراسات السابقة : : 1.4.2
35. : (2011).1 324 :. " ( 2011 م).2." 290
36. " " ( 2011 م).3." 75 ) :. ( : ( 2010 م).4. 110
37. " : ( 2010 م).5." 134. " : (2008).6. "
38 (221) :. " : (33 :2010) ( 2002 ).7 :.". 2.4.2 : : (2011) Gana & Bababe.8. /
39 60.. " " (2011) Jabeen.9. : " ( 2010 م) Gure.10." :
40 %20. " ( 2009 م) Al Jishi.11.".
41 " (2005) Leah et. al.12. " 8. " (1998) Mayfield et..13. ". 3.4.2
42. :.
43 : (1. (2 () (3. : (4..
44.3 : : 1.3. ". (2009 ) " 2.3 :
45 (1-3) 37 5 32 60 8 52 352 112 240 449 125 324 www.ammancity.gov.jo : 3.3 : 150.(2008 ) : (2-3) (2-3) 12 12.3 0.082 37 20 20.1 0.134 60 118 117.6 0.784 352 150 150 449 :
46 150 (2-3) 60 37 352. 150 0.082 = 449 37 : :. 82 : 12.3 = 150 0.082 (150) :. 12 150 (150) (6-3) (5-3) (4-3) (3-3) : :
47 (3-3) 58.7 88 41.3 62 100 150 : %58.7 (3-3) %41.3. (4-3) 34.7 52 54.7 82 10.7 16 - - 100 150 :
48 (4-3) (%54.7) %34.7 (%10.7). (5-3) - - 13.3 20 86.7 130 100 150 : (5-3) (%86.7) (%13.3)
49. (6-3) 16.7 25 5 35.3 53 10-5 32 48 15-10 16 24 15 100 150 : (6-3) (%35.3) (%32) 15 15 10 5 (%16.7) 15 (%16).
50 4.3 :. : ( ). 5.3 :. (1 (150) (2 ( ). SPSS (3 : (4) - ( )
51. ) - : ( 25) ( 6 9 10. (10) - (4 : () (4) (5).(1) (2) (3) : 1 42 3 4 5 (5. (6 :
52 = 3 1 5 = :. 1.33. 2.33 1. 3.67 2.34. 5 3.68 : 6.3 : : :.... :. : : 7.3 : ( ) :
53 تحسين الجنس المو هل العلمي المسمى الوظيفي سنوات الخبرة (1-3) : (1-3) ( ) () () (). () : 8.3
54 : :... (6) (1) (1) (13) (12) : (20) (12) (11) () 25 10 () :.(3) (1) : 9.3
55 Cornbach ) : (Alpha (7-3) ( ) 0.84 10 0.92 9 0.69 6 0.90 25 0.93 10 0.94 35 (7-3) 0.92 0.69 0.94 0.94 0.93 (cronbach Alpha).
56 10.3 -SPSS Statistical package for social sciences : (1. Cronbach Alpha (2 (3.. (4. t (5 One Way ANOVA (6
57.4. : : :.. (1-4)
58 (1-4) 2 1.015 2.27 1 5 0.934 1.82 2 7 0.720 1.76 3 8 0.758 1.60 4 3 0.941 2.01 5 4 0.951 1.97 6 6 0.860 1.77 7 10 0.671 1.29 8 9 0.756 1.47 9 1 1.084 2.47 10 0.562 1.84 : (1-4) -1.29) (1.84) (2.47 " (2.47) "
59 ( 1.084) (1.84 ) " " (1.84) (2.27) " (1.015) (1.29) " (0.671) (1.84)... (2-4) (2-4) 7 1.024 2.06 6 0.988 2.17 9 0.955 1.97 1 1.113 2.83 8 1.036 1.99 11 12 13 14 15
60 2 0.906 2.40 16 3 1.059 2.27 17 5 1.125 2.23 18 4 1.179 2.24 19 0.820 2.24 : (2-4) -1.97) (2.24) (2.83 " (2.83) " (1.113) (2.24) " " (2.24 ) (2.42 ) " (0.906) (1.97) " (0.955) (2.24).
61.. (3-4) 4 3 6 5 1 2 (3-4) 1.276 2.05 20 1.277 3.11 21 1.142 1.68 ( ) 22 1.230 1.85 23 0.940 4.34 24 1.218 4.11 ( ) 25 0.745 2.86 : (3-4) (4.34-1.68 ) (2.86)
62 " " (2.86) (4.34) ( ) " (0.940) (4.11) " (1.218) (2.86) () " (1.68) " (1.142) (2.86). : : :
63 (4-4) 1 1.139 3.50 20 4 1.185 3.33 2 3 1.160 3.36 3 9 1.231 3.03 4 5 1.089 3.26 5 7 1.116 3.25 ( ) 6 8 1.229 3.24 7 8 1.229 3.24 8 6 1.254 3.25 9 1 1.139 3.50 10 0.951 3.15 : (4-4) (3.50-2.16) (3.15) " : " (3.500) " " (1.139) (3.15)
64 " (3.15) (2.16) (1.198). 2.4 : (α 0.05) (5-4) (5-4) Sig * T Β Sig * DF F R 2 ) ( (R) 0.015 2.455 0.29 0.00 3 18.999 0.28 0.530 9 0 1 0.000 4.200 0.56 6 146 0.001 3.260 0.37 149 7 (α 0.05) :
65 (5-4) α 0.05) (0.530 ) R (0.281) (0.281) R2 ( (0.377 ) (0.566 ) (0.299) β (0.299 ) β F (0.377 ) (0.566) (α 0.05) (18.999) (α 0.05) :. : (α 0.05) :. (6-4)
66 (6-4) Sig * T Β Sig * DF 0.007 2.750 0.373 0.007 1 148 149 F (R 2 ) (R) 7.563 0.049 0.220 (α 0.05). : (6-4). ( 0.220) R ( 0.049) (0.049 ) R 2 (α 0.05) (0.373) β (7.563) F T (0.373) (2.750) T (α 0.05) (α 0.05)
67 :. (α 0.05) (α 0.05) :. : (7-4) Sig * T Β Sig * DF 0.000 7.016 0.579 0.000 1 F (R 2 ) (R) 49.227 0.250 0.500 148 149 (α 0.05). : (7-4) ( 0.500 )R (0.250 ) R 2 (α 0.05) ( 0.579 ) β ( 0.250)
68 F ( 0.579) آما بلغت قيمة T المحسوبة (α 0.05) (49.227) (α (7.016) وهي دالة عند مستوى (0.05 : (α 0.05). (α 0.05) :. (8-4) Sig * T Β Sig * DF 0.000 6.383 0.593 0.000 1 148 149 F (R 2 ) (R) 40.748 0.216 0.465 (α 0.05). :
69 (8-4) ) R (0.216) R2 (α 0.05) (0.465 (0.216) (0.593)β ) F (0.593) 6.383) T ( وهي (α 0.05) ( 40.748 (α دالة عند مستوى (0.05 :. (α 0.05) : (α 0.05). t : One Way ANOVA (α 0.05) :
70 t ( ) : (α 0.05) (9-4) t Sig 0.004 148 t 1.655 t 2.957 0.629 2.512 88 ذآور الفروق لدور التحفيز في تحسين الا داء إناث 0.518 2.225 62 لدى موظفي أمانة عمان الكبرى. : (9-4) (t) (2.957) (t) (α 0.05) (2.51) (1.655) (2.23) (α 0.05) :. (α 0.05) :.
71 One Way ANOVA ) ( : (α 0.05) (10-4) 0.601 2.393 0.800 2.618 0.596 2.411 0.526 2.297. : (10-4) : (11-4) One Way ANOVA
72 (11-4) SIG * F DF SOS S.O.V MS 0.162 1.84 0.659 2 1.317 0.358 147 149 52.565 53.882. : (11-4) (1.84) (F) (α 0.05) :. (3.06) (F) (α 0.05). (α 0.05) : One Way ANOVA ) (
73 (α 0.05) t ( ) (12-4) (12-4) t ( ) SIG t t 0.003 148 1.655 3.014 0.514 0.595 2.76 2.34 20 130. : (12-4) (3.014) (t) (α 0.05) *2.34)
74 :. (α 0.05) :. One Way ANOVA -5 5 ) ( 15 15-10 10.(α 0.05) (13-4) (13-4) 15-10 15 10-5 5 0.469 1.991 0.584 2.354 0.644 2.457 0.421 2.72. :
75 (13-3). (14-4) One Way ANOVA (14-4) SIG * F DF SOS S.O.V MS 0.000 7.095 2.285 3 6.856 0.322 146 149 47.025 53.882. : (14-4) (7.095) (F) (α 0.05) (2.666) (F) (α 0.05) :.
76 Scheffee. (15-4) (15-4) Scheffee 15-10 15 5 10 5 *0.7298 0.3664 0.2634 - *0.4663 0.1029 - - 0.3633 - - - - - - - أقل من 5 سنوات 2.72 من 5 إلى أقل من 10 سنوات 2.46 15 سنة من 10 إلى أقل من 2.35 أآثر من 15 سنة 1.99 (*) (14-4). : 15 5 5 ( *0.7298) 15 (2.72). (1.99) 10-5 (*0.4663) 15
77 (2.46) 10-5.(1.99) 15. ( 5 )
78 الفصل الخامس مناقشة نتاي ج الدراسة : : (1-4) (1.84).
79 ( 2011 م) ( 2010 م) ( 2010 م). (2-4) ) 2.24 (. (2011) Gana & Bababe ( 2010 م).
80 (3-4) 2.86.. :
81 مستوى التحفيز لدى أمانة عم ان الكبرى 3 2.5 2 1.5 Series1 1 0.5 0 البعد الاجتماعي البعد المعنوي البعد المالي (1-5). : (1-5).
82 (4-4). (2008) (2011) Jabeen.
83 2.5 (5-4) (4.200) (2.455) t 0.015) : 0.05 (3.260) و 0.000 و 0.001 ). β ( 100) %38 و %57 ) 30) % و (α 0.05). (α 0.05) (2011) ( 2010 م) ( 2010 م) Gure
84 Mayfield (1998) et.. : أثر الحوافز على تحسین الا داء لدى موظفي أمانة عم ان الآبرى الحوافز التحفيز المادیة المادي المعنوي المعنویة التحفيز الحوافز الحوافز الاجتماعية التحفيز الاجتماعي (2-5). : (2-5)
85. : :.1 (6-4) t β 0.007 (2.750) %37 ( 100) (α 0.05). (α 0.05) ( 2010 م) ( 2010 م) ( 2011 م)
86. :.2 (7-4) t β 0.000 (7.016) ( 100) %58 (α 0.05). (α 0.05) ( 2010 م) ( 2009 م) Al Jishi
87. :.3 (8-4) β 0.000 (6.383) t ( 100) %59 (α 0.05) (α 0.05). ( 2010 م).
88 : :.1 (α 0.05) (9-4) (3-3) %58.7 %41.3 %17.4. ( 2010 م). :.2 (11-4) (10-4) : (α 0.05)
89. (2011) ( 2011 م) " ( 2010 م). :.3 (12-4) :.
90 ( 2010 م). ( 2011 م) ". :.4 (15-4) (14-4) (13-4) ( 5 ) : ( 5 )
91. (2011). ( 2010 م). :
92 : (5 1.84.2.24 (6.2.86 (7 (2.86). (8.(1.84).3.15 (9 ( ) (10 () %37 ( ).%59 %57 (11 (α 0.05)
93. (12 (α 0.05) :.
94 : (3. (4. (5 :. (6. (7. (8. (9.
95 (10.
96 قاي مة المصادر والمراجع : : ".(2010) ". :. :.(2000) ".( 2002 ).(13)24 ".(2010) : www.faculty.ksu.edu.sa/alhomod/sfile/egovernment13.pdf " ".(2009). www.ammancity.gov.jo : ".(2011) " : http://www.abahe.co.uk : ".(2011) ". :
97 :.(2005). :.(1995).(63)17. :.(2003) :. (2000). :.( 2006 ) ".(2008). ". : : " : ".(2002). :.(2004). : 2. (2001). : 3.(2005).
98 : ".(2000).(76)24 ".(2009) : www.unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/.../arado/unpan024617..pdf : :.(2003).. :.( 2006 ) ".(2011) : " : http://eco.najah.edu/sites/eco.najah.edu/files/%20.(2011 ).(1)27 :. (1990 ).. : " ".(2003) : " ".(2008).
99. : " ".(2009 ).(2003).(30)17 : :.(2008). : " ".(2009). ".(2010) " :..(1998). :
100 : : -Al Jishi, Hala Abdulhadi (2009). "Motivation and Its Effect on Performance on Nurses in Aramco Health Center", Open University Malaysia, On Line, Available at http://www.masterstudies.net/media/pdf/ - Gana, Alimi Baba & Bababe, Fatima Bbkar (2011). "The Effects of Motivation on Workers Performance: A Case Study off Maiduguri Flour Mill LTD. Borno State, Nigeria", University of Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria,On Line, Available at: http://wiloludjournal.academia.edu/francisolawaleabulude/papers/79 - Gibbs, John (2004) "Performance Measure Properties and Incentives- Institute for the Study of Labor, No.(1356), On Line, Available at: www.alazhar.edu.ps/library/aattachedfile.asp - Gure, Naima Abdullahi (2010). "The Impact of Motivation on Employee Performance: A Study of Nationlink Telecom Somalia", Masters thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia, On Line, Available at: http://etd.uum.edu.my/2488/. - Jabeen, Maimona (2011). "Impact of Performance Appraisal on Employees Motivatioon", The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan, European Journal of Business and Management Vol 3, No.4, On Line, Available at: www.iiste.org - Kiyoshi, Takahashi, (2006): " Effects of wage and promotion incentives on the motivation levels of Japanese employees", Research paper, Journal: Career Development International Volume: 11 Issue: 3
101 - Leah, Koehler; Brian, Iwata; Elleen, Roscoe; Natalie, Rolider; Laura, O'steen. (2005). "Effects of Stimulus Variation on the Reinforcing Capability of Non Preferred Stimuli", University of Florida, On Line, Available at www.seeingthefield.com/responsetimetostimuli.pdf. - Mayfield, Jacqueline Rowley; Mayfield, Milton Ray; Kopf, Jerry (1998). "The effects of Leader Motivating Language on Subordinate Performance and Satisfaction", Human Resource Management, Fall/ Winter, Vol.37, No.3 & 4, Pp. 235-248, On Line, Available at www.uthscsa.edu/.../effectsofleadermotivatinglang -Toshiba Cecilia, (2006). " sparks a wave of innovation: New structures and incentives stimulate employee creativity", Journal Human Resource Management International Digest, Case study, Volume: 14 Issue: 6.
102 (1) :... : " " : : :....
103 : : ( ) : : : : مدیر : 10 5 5. 15 أقل من 15 سنة 10
104 : : :.......... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
105 : :......... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
106 : :... ( )... ( ). 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
107 : :.. 1 2.... ()... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
108 (2). 1. 2. 3. 4. 5
109 (3) : /... :
110 : : ( ) : : : : مدیر : 10 5 5. 15 أقل من 15 سنة 10
111 : : ( ) :......... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
112 : : ( ) : 11. 12. 13. 14 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.
113 : : ( ) : 20. 21. ( ) 22. 23. 24. ( ) 25.
114 : :...... ().... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10