Math 6710, Fall 2016 Final Exam Solutions

Similar documents
MATH 507a ASSIGNMENT 4 SOLUTIONS FALL 2018 Prof. Alexander. g (x) dx = g(b) g(0) = g(b),

STK4080/9080 Survival and event history analysis

Lecture 15 First Properties of the Brownian Motion

Extremal graph theory II: K t and K t,t

1 Notes on Little s Law (l = λw)

Math 2414 Homework Set 7 Solutions 10 Points

Solution. 1 Solutions of Homework 6. Sangchul Lee. April 28, Problem 1.1 [Dur10, Exercise ]

Calculus Limits. Limit of a function.. 1. One-Sided Limits...1. Infinite limits 2. Vertical Asymptotes...3. Calculating Limits Using the Limit Laws.

Actuarial Society of India

λiv Av = 0 or ( λi Av ) = 0. In order for a vector v to be an eigenvector, it must be in the kernel of λi

Section 8 Convolution and Deconvolution

Solutions to Problems 3, Level 4

Moment Generating Function

Supplement for SADAGRAD: Strongly Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Methods"

N! AND THE GAMMA FUNCTION

A TAUBERIAN THEOREM FOR THE WEIGHTED MEAN METHOD OF SUMMABILITY

Ideal Amplifier/Attenuator. Memoryless. where k is some real constant. Integrator. System with memory

BEST LINEAR FORECASTS VS. BEST POSSIBLE FORECASTS

Using Linnik's Identity to Approximate the Prime Counting Function with the Logarithmic Integral

Mathematical Statistics. 1 Introduction to the materials to be covered in this course

Solutions to selected problems from the midterm exam Math 222 Winter 2015

Notes 03 largely plagiarized by %khc

The Central Limit Theorem

COS 522: Complexity Theory : Boaz Barak Handout 10: Parallel Repetition Lemma

A note on deviation inequalities on {0, 1} n. by Julio Bernués*

2 f(x) dx = 1, 0. 2f(x 1) dx d) 1 4t t6 t. t 2 dt i)

CLOSED FORM EVALUATION OF RESTRICTED SUMS CONTAINING SQUARES OF FIBONOMIAL COEFFICIENTS

K3 p K2 p Kp 0 p 2 p 3 p

th m m m m central moment : E[( X X) ] ( X X) ( x X) f ( x)

1. Solve by the method of undetermined coefficients and by the method of variation of parameters. (4)

David Randall. ( )e ikx. k = u x,t. u( x,t)e ikx dx L. x L /2. Recall that the proof of (1) and (2) involves use of the orthogonality condition.

Lecture 9: Polynomial Approximations

An interesting result about subset sums. Nitu Kitchloo. Lior Pachter. November 27, Abstract

FIXED FUZZY POINT THEOREMS IN FUZZY METRIC SPACE

Calculus BC 2015 Scoring Guidelines

Big O Notation for Time Complexity of Algorithms

LIMITS OF FUNCTIONS (I)

EXISTENCE THEORY OF RANDOM DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS D. S. Palimkar

10.3 Autocorrelation Function of Ergodic RP 10.4 Power Spectral Density of Ergodic RP 10.5 Normal RP (Gaussian RP)

Lecture 8 April 18, 2018

Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences University of Alberta

OLS bias for econometric models with errors-in-variables. The Lucas-critique Supplementary note to Lecture 17

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 4 9/16/2013. Applications of the large deviation technique

1 Convergence in Probability and the Weak Law of Large Numbers

Review Exercises for Chapter 9

Basic Results in Functional Analysis

B. Maddah INDE 504 Simulation 09/02/17

L-functions and Class Numbers

12 Getting Started With Fourier Analysis

ECE-314 Fall 2012 Review Questions

Comparison between Fourier and Corrected Fourier Series Methods

ODEs II, Supplement to Lectures 6 & 7: The Jordan Normal Form: Solving Autonomous, Homogeneous Linear Systems. April 2, 2003

Problems and Solutions for Section 3.2 (3.15 through 3.25)

SUMMATION OF INFINITE SERIES REVISITED

xp (X = x) = P (X = 1) = θ. Hence, the method of moments estimator of θ is

Convergence theorems. Chapter Sampling

A Note on Random k-sat for Moderately Growing k

Pure Math 30: Explained!

Exercise 3 Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems 4T400, 6 May

Additional Tables of Simulation Results

ECE 350 Matlab-Based Project #3

Online Supplement to Reactive Tabu Search in a Team-Learning Problem

The analysis of the method on the one variable function s limit Ke Wu

Outline. simplest HMM (1) simple HMMs? simplest HMM (2) Parameter estimation for discrete hidden Markov models

Applying the Moment Generating Functions to the Study of Probability Distributions

(C) x 3 + y 3 = 2(x 2 + y 2 ) (D) x y 2 (A) (10)! (B) (11)! (C) (10)! + 1 (D) (11)! 1. n in the expansion of 2 (A) 15 (B) 45 (C) 55 (D) 56

Introduction to Probability. Ariel Yadin

F D D D D F. smoothed value of the data including Y t the most recent data.

CSE 241 Algorithms and Data Structures 10/14/2015. Skip Lists

Brownian Motion An Introduction to Stochastic Processes de Gruyter Graduate, Berlin 2012 ISBN:

INVESTMENT PROJECT EFFICIENCY EVALUATION

CSE 202: Design and Analysis of Algorithms Lecture 16

Fermat Numbers in Multinomial Coefficients

RENEWAL THEORY FOR EMBEDDED REGENERATIVE SETS. BY JEAN BERTOIN Universite Pierre et Marie Curie

MATH 112: HOMEWORK 6 SOLUTIONS. Problem 1: Rudin, Chapter 3, Problem s k < s k < 2 + s k+1

Convergence of random variables. (telegram style notes) P.J.C. Spreij

7.1 Convergence of sequences of random variables

Introduction to the Mathematics of Lévy Processes

If boundary values are necessary, they are called mixed initial-boundary value problems. Again, the simplest prototypes of these IV problems are:

Sequences and Series of Functions

Chapter 3 Moments of a Distribution

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.fa] 1 Feb 1994

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (b) (a) sin. (c) sin sin 0. 2 π = + (d) k l k l (e) if x = 3 is a solution of the equation x 5x+ 12=

Price Competition with Population Uncertainty

Manipulations involving the signal amplitude (dependent variable).

MATH 4330/5330, Fourier Analysis Section 6, Proof of Fourier s Theorem for Pointwise Convergence

7.1 Convergence of sequences of random variables

Institute of Actuaries of India

Economics 8723 Macroeconomic Theory Problem Set 2 Professor Sanjay Chugh Spring 2017

AN EXTENSION OF LUCAS THEOREM. Hong Hu and Zhi-Wei Sun. (Communicated by David E. Rohrlich)

S n. = n. Sum of first n terms of an A. P is

d) If the sequence of partial sums converges to a limit L, we say that the series converges and its

Supplementary Information for Thermal Noises in an Aqueous Quadrupole Micro- and Nano-Trap

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.pr] 5 Jul 2006

5.74 Introductory Quantum Mechanics II

TAKA KUSANO. laculty of Science Hrosh tlnlersty 1982) (n-l) + + Pn(t)x 0, (n-l) + + Pn(t)Y f(t,y), XR R are continuous functions.

A Note on Prediction with Misspecified Models

BAYESIAN ESTIMATION METHOD FOR PARAMETER OF EPIDEMIC SIR REED-FROST MODEL. Puji Kurniawan M

Paper 3A3 The Equations of Fluid Flow and Their Numerical Solution Handout 1

In this section we will study periodic signals in terms of their frequency f t is said to be periodic if (4.1)

Transcription:

Mah 67, Fall 6 Fial Exam Soluios. Firs, a sude poied ou a suble hig: if P (X i p >, he X + + X (X + + X / ( evaluaes o / wih probabiliy p >. This is roublesome because a radom variable is supposed o be defied uder all circumsaces ad here is o aural choice for he /. Foruaely, i does maer. Suppose we make wo differe choices for how o assig he value of ( whe X X, leadig o radom variables U, U such ha P (U U p. Sice σ > we have p <, so P (U U. For all x R, P (U x P (U U + P (U x, P (U x P (U U + P (U x. If U U he P (U x P (U x for all x a which he disribuio fucio of U is coiuous. The iequaliies above imply ha P (U x P (U x for all such x, implyig ha U U also. For our problem, if we make ay choice for he value of /, for example X + + X U (X + + if X X /,..., X are o all zero, if X X, ad show ha U Z N(,, he he same weak covergece would hold for ay oher choice U. Wih ha preamble, we proceed o he argume. Wrie U W Y where W X ( + + X σ σ, Y X + + X ad Y whe X X. The W Z N(, by he classical Ceral Limi Theorem. Wih probabiliy, X + +X will be eveually posiive for all pas a cerai poi, so X + + X σ for sufficiely large. Y The righ side coverges o a.s. by he classical Srog Law of Large Numbers, so he lef side does also. Le g(x / x; he each g(/y Y sice < Y <. Because g is coiuous a x, ( Y g Y g( a.s. We have show ha W Z ad Y a.s., which implies Y. Usig Problem o Homework, we coclude ha U W Y Z. /

. (a Le S E be he umber of edges i (V, E for. Number he poeial edges (i.e. pairs of disic verices from o ( ad defie he idicaor variables X,k by X,k if edge k is prese i E ad X,k if edge k is abse from E. For each, he X,k are iid wih P (X,k P (X,k. I addiio, S X, + + X,(. To prove a srog law of large umbers for S, we mimic he proof of Theorem 8. i he oes (Srog Law for bouded fourh momes. Defie he ceered variables X,k X,k, S S ( X, + +X,(. The argume i he proof of Theorem 8. shows ha E[S4 ] C ( where C E[X 4,] 6. Coiuig as i ha proof, Chebyshev/Markov s iequaliy shows ha for all ε >, ( ( ( 4 S P ( > ε P S 4 > ε 4 C( 4 C. As ( (, P ( S ( > ε C ε 4 The firs Borel-Caelli lemma implies ha ( S P ( > ε i.o.. ε 4( 4 ( 4 <. ε 4( Sice his holds for all ε >, i follows ha S ( S ( a.s. ( which is a srog law of large umbers for S. For a ceral limi heorem, oe ha each S has disribuio Biomial( (,, wih mea ( ad variace 4(. We aim o show ha S ( ( Z N(,. ( Le Y, Y,... be iid, P (Y i P (Y i, ad le T k Y + + Y k Biomial(k,. The classical Ceral Limi Theorem says ha T k k Z. ( k Boh ( ad ( are saemes abou he covergece of sequeces of disribuio fucios. The sequece of disribuio fucios i ( is a subsequece of he oe i (: ake k ( (, (, 4,.... Therefore ( direcly implies (, sice weak covergece of a sequece implies weak covergece of every subsequece. This complees he proof.

Aleraively, we could use he Lideberg-Feller Ceral Limi Theorem o prove ( direcly. Se ( U,k X,k (, W U, + + U,( S (. The h row of he riagular array has ( eries raher ha eries as i he saeme of Lideberg-Feller i he oes. However, he proof exeds wihou chage o he siuaio where each row has a arbirary umber of eries. Thus, o show ha W Z i suffices o check ha: (i ( ( lim E[U,k], (ii lim E[U,k; U,k > ε] for all ε >. k Boh codiios are easily verified. For (i, k ( Var(X, + + Var(X,( E[U,k]. k ( For (ii, sice each U,k /, if ε > is fixed he for large eough, each E[U,k ; U,k > ε]. Thus W Z, as desired. (b For each, umber he riples of disic verices from o (. Le X,k if riagle k is prese i he graph ad X,k if riagle k is abse. Thus, P (X,k 8 ad P (X,k 7 8. Sice T X, + + X,(, we have E[T ] 8(. Nex we compue Var(T E[T] E[T ] : E[T] E[X,j X,k ], E[T ] E[X,j ]E[X,k ]. j,k ( j,k ( 4( j,k ( (Noe ha each erm i he laer sum is 64, which is cosise wih E[T ] 64(. So, Var(T ( E[X,j X,k ] E[X,j ]E[X,k ] ( E[X,j X,k ]. 64 j,k ( The radom variable X,j X,k is if boh riagle j ad riagle k are prese i he graph, ad oherwise. There are hree cases: ( j k, so boh riagles are he same. The E[X,j X,k ] 64 8 64 7 64. There are ( erms of his ype. ( The wo riagles share a sigle edge. There are five disic edges which mus be prese i he graph i order for X,j X,k o equal, so E[X,j X,k ] 64 64 64. To cou he umber of erms of his ype, suppose riagle j has verices u, v, w. Triagle k could have verices u, v, x or u, w, x or v, w, x for ay x amog he remaiig verices. Therefore, for each j here are ( choices for k, ad he oal umber of erms is ( (.

( The wo riagles share o edges. The X,j ad X,k are idepede, so E[X,j X,k ] 64 E[X,j ]E[X,k ] 64. I does o maer how may of hese erms here are, sice hey coribue zero o Var(T, bu we could sill cou hem if we wa o. Give riagle j wih verices u, v, w, riagle k could have verices u, x, y or v, x, y or w, x, y or x, y, z. This gives ( ( + possibiliies, so he oal umber of erms is [ ( ( + ] (. Addig up he oal umber of erms from cases (,(,( gives [ + ( + ( + ( ] ( ( which is he correc umber of erms i he sum. Agai, his is uecessary bu i is a good way o check ha he umbers i cases ( ad ( are righ. From he couig procedure above, Var(T 7 ( + ( ( C 4 64 64 where we ca ake C 8. To prove a srog law of large umbers for T, use Chebyshev s iequaliy. For all ε >, ( P T 8( ( > ε C4 ε (. The deomiaor has order 6, so he sum over of hese probabiliies should be fiie. Ideed, sice ( 6 as ad C 4 ε ( /6 6C ε <, he limi compariso es implies ha ( P T 8( ( > ε <. By he firs Borel-Caelli lemma, ( P T 8( ( > ε i.o.. Sice his holds for all ε >, i follows ha T 8( ( a.s. which is he desired srog law of large umbers for T. 4

. (a Defie X X, X X if X > X, if X X, if X < X, X, X X,. Because X X X, X + X X, X, X + X,, i suffices o prove ha E X, X ad E X,. By cosrucio, { X X if X > X, X, if X X. Sice X X a.s., also X X a.s. ad herefore X, a.s. I follows ha X, X X, X a.s., so ha X, X a.s. Also, X, X ad X, X X. Thus E X, E X ad E X, X by domiaed covergece. Nex, observe ha X, X X,. Therefore, E X, E X E X, E X E X. This complees he proof. (b Saeme: For p >, if X X a.s. ad E[ X p ] E[ X p ], he E[ X X p ]. Proof: Defie X,, X, as i par (a. If we ca show ha E[ X, X p ] ad E[ X, p ], he X X p X, X p + X, p, which implies ha E[ X X p ]. By he argume i par (a, X, X a.s., which implies ha X, p X p a.s. ad X, X p a.s. The bouds X, p X p ad X, X p ( X p, alog wih E[ X p ] <, imply ha E[ X, p ] E[ X p ] ad E[ X, X p ] by domiaed covergece. Nex, sice X, + X, X, we have X, p + X, p X p. This is a geeral fac: If p > ad a, b, he a p + b p (a + b p. Quick proof: The saeme is rivial if a + b. If a + b > he a/(a + b, b/(a + b [, ] ad so ( a a + b p + ( b a + b p a a + b + b a + b ap + b p (a + b p. (The fac also follows from covexiy of x x p. We obai E[ X, p ] E[ X p ] E[ X, p ], so lim sup E[ X, p ] lim sup E[ X p ] lim if E[ X, p ] E[ X p ] E[ X p ], meaig ha E[ X, p ]. This complees he proof. 4. Our overall sraegy is o defie radom variables X,..., X ad Y,..., Y o he same probabiliy space such ha he X i are iid wih disribuio fucio F ad he Y i are iid wih disribuio fucio U (i.e. Y i Uiform[, ]. Le F (x #{ i : X i x}, U (y #{ i : Y i y} ad D (F sup F (x F (x, D (U sup U (y U(y. y R 5

I our cosrucio, i will hold ha D (F D (U, wih equaliy whe F is coiuous. This will prove boh pars (a ad (b. The probabiliy space is Ω (, wih Lebesgue measure. (Tha is, pu Lebesgue measure o each ierval (, ad ake he produc measure. Give ω (ω,..., ω, le Y i (ω ω i for i, so he Y i are iid Uiform[, ] radom variables. For < y <, defie F (y if{x R : F (x y}. For each i, le X i F (Y i. The X i are idepede, ad each X i has disribuio fucio F by he proof of Theorem. i he oes. I ha proof, i is show ha for all x R, X i x if ad oly if Y i F (x. Hece F (x #{i : X i x} #{i : Y i F (x} U (F (x ad so F (x F (x U (F (x F (x U (F (x U(F (x. (The las equaliy is because U(y y for all y. I follows ha sup I oher words, D (F F (x F (x sup D (U, provig par (b. U (F (x U(F (x sup U (y U(y. y R If F is coiuous, he rage of F icludes every < y < by he Iermediae Value Theorem. Thus sup F (x F (x sup U (F (x U(F (x sup U (y U(y. <y< I fac, U (y U(y for all y / (,. If y he U(y, ad also U (y sice each Y i >. If y he U(y, ad also U (y sice each Y i <. Therefore, sup <y< so we have show he reverse iequaliy D (F U (y U(y sup U (y U(y y R D (U, provig par (a. 5. (a From Theorems 8. ad 8. i he oes, {S } is recurre if ad oly if P (S. Sice P (R P (N( P (R N( P (N( P (S, we use Fubii s Theorem o compue For each, P (R d P (N( P (S d P (S P (N( d. P (N( d is he expeced amou of ime ha he Poisso process says a level, which is he expeced amou of ime bewee he h ad ( + s arrivals, which 6

equals. This argume ca be made rigorous, bu we ca also evaluae he iegral direcly. Sice N( Poisso(, ( P (N( d e d.! We prove by iducio ha his iegral equals for every. Whe, e d. Whe, iegraio by pars gives ( ( e d e!! e ( which equals by he iducive hypohesis. I coclusio, P (R d which is ifiie if ad oly if {S } is recurre. (! d P (S, e ( (! d, (b If x (x,..., x d R d, defie he orm x max{ x i : i d}. This is jus for cosisecy wih he oes; he saemes ad argumes work for ay orm o R d. Saeme: {S } is recurre if ad oly if Proof: There are wo seps: ( {S } is recurre if ad oly if ( For fixed ε >, P ( R < ε d for all ε >. P ( S < ε for all ε >. P ( S < ε Sep is proved exacly as i par (a: P ( R < ε d P ( R < ε d. P (N( P ( S < ε d P ( S < ε P (N( d P ( S < ε. Therefore i suffices o prove sep. Oe direcio is quick. Suppose he sum i sep is fiie for some ε >. The by he firs Borel-Caelli lemma, P ( S < ε i.o., so is o a recurre value of {S }. I follows from Theorem 8. ha {S } is o recurre. Coversely, suppose {S } is o recurre. By Theorem 8., is o a recurre value, so here exiss ε > such ha P ( S < ε i.o.. I follows ha here exiss δ > such ha P ( S 7

δ for all >. To see why, assume for coradicio ha for every δ >, P ( S δ for all. Le τ ad for k, τ k mi{ > τ k : S S τk < ε/ k }. We show by iducio ha each τ k is a.s. fiie. Sice τ k is a a.s. fiie soppig ime, he sequece {S τk +m S τk } m has he same law as {S m } m eve whe we codiio o he value of τ k. Usig he assumpio, wih probabiliy here exiss > τ k such ha S S τk < ε/ k, so τ k is a.s. fiie. For each k, S τk S τk S τ Hece P ( S < ε i.o., a coradicio. k S τj S τj < j k j ε k < ε. We have show ha if {S } is o recurre, he here exiss δ > such ha p : P ( S δ for all >. Le V #{ : S < δ/}. The E[V ] P ( S < δ/ ad also E[V ] k P (V > k. Le α ad for k, α k mi{ > α k : S < δ/}. Each α k is a soppig ime, ad P (V > k P (α k <. Give ha α k <, ad give he hisory of he radom walk up o ime α k, we kow ha S αk < δ/. Also, wih probabiliy p >, S S αk δ for every > α k. This implies ha S S S αk S αk δ/ for every > α k, so α k. We coclude ha P (α k < α k < p, ad so P (α k < ( p k by iducio. Hece P ( S < δ/ E[V ] P (α k < ( p k <. k This fiishes he proof of he coverse direcio i sep. (c We cosruc he simple radom walk i he followig maer. Le e,..., e d be he sadard basis vecors i R d (e.g. e (,,,...,. Le V, V,... be iid, P (V i j /d for j d. Le W, W,... be iid ad idepede of he V i, P (W i P (W i /. The we ca se X i W i e Vi ad S X + + X. The jh coordiae of he radom walk afer seps is S (j {V i j}w i. Passig o he coiuous ime versio R S N(, he jh coordiae a ime is i N( R (j {V i j}w i. i 8 k

Fix. For each j d, le N j ( #{ i N( : V i j}. Problem 5 o Homework (hiig of Poisso variables shows ha each N j ( Poisso(/d ad ha he N j ( are idepede. Give he values of he N j (, he R (j are codiioally idepede wih P (R (j x N (,..., N d ( d P (T j x where {T } is a discree ime simple radom walk o Z. Therefore, P (R ( x,..., R (d x d P (N (,..., N d ( d P (R (x,..., x d N (,..., N d ( d,..., d,..., d d d P (N j ( j P (T j x j j j ( ( P (N ( P (T x P (N d ( d P ( x d d ( ( P (N(/d P (T x P (N(/d d P ( x d P (Y /d x P (Y /d x d, d where {Y } is a coiuous ime simple radom walk o Z. Summig over all possible values of x,..., x j, x j+,..., x d gives P (R (j x j P (Y /d x j. Thus he R (j are iid ad have he same law as Y /d. I follows ha P (R P (R (,..., R (d P (Y /d P (Y /d P (Y /d d. (d Le {S } ad {R } be discree ad coiuous ime simple radom walks o Z d. Assume ha c P (Y C for all T. Sice P (R d, by par (a, {S } is recurre if ad oly if P (R d <. Par (c shows ha P (R P (Y /d d. We compue P (Y /d d d P (Y /d d d ( d C d C d d d/ d, /d d/ ( d c d c d d d/ d. /d d/ Whe d or d, (/d/ d diverges ad so {S } is recurre. Whe d, he iegral coverges ad so {S } is rasie. 9