Basic Error Analysis. Physics 401 Spring 2015 Eugene V Colla

Similar documents
Basic Error Analysis. Physics 401 Fall 2017 Eugene V Colla

Basic Error Analysis. Physics 401 Fall 2018 Eugene V Colla

Physics 401. Fall 2018 Eugene V. Colla. 10/8/2018 Physics 401 1

Physics 401. Fall 2017 Eugene V. Colla. 10/9/2017 Physics 401 1

; F- Faraday constant, N A - Avagadro constant. Best. uncertainty ~1.6 ppm. 4. From Josephson (K J = 2e. constants. ) and von Klitzing R h

Physics 401, Spring 2016 Eugene V. Colla

; F- Faraday constant, N A - Avagadro constant. Best. uncertainty ~1.6 ppm. 4. From Josephson (K J = 2e. constants. ) and von Klitzing R h

BRIDGE CIRCUITS EXPERIMENT 5: DC AND AC BRIDGE CIRCUITS 10/2/13

Pulses in transmission lines

Pulses in transmission lines

Error? Relative error = Theory: g = 9.8 m/sec 2 Measured: g = 9.7 m/sec 2

Application Note AN37. Noise Histogram Analysis. by John Lis

Some Statistics. V. Lindberg. May 16, 2007

Topic 1.2 Measurement and Uncertainties Uncertainty and error in measurement. Random Errors

Fundamentals of data, graphical, and error analysis

Experiment P43: RC Circuit (Power Amplifier, Voltage Sensor)

Uncertainty in Measurements

The Treatment of Numerical Experimental Results

Coupled Electrical Oscillators Physics Advanced Physics Lab - Summer 2018 Don Heiman, Northeastern University, 5/24/2018

PARADISE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE PHYSICS COLLEGE PHYSICS I LABORATORY

Uncertainty in Physical Measurements: Module 5 Data with Two Variables

To investigate further the series LCR circuit, especially around the point of minimum impedance. 1 Electricity & Electronics Constructor EEC470

Introduction to Statistics and Error Analysis

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PHYSICS DEPARTMENT

Notes Errors and Noise PHYS 3600, Northeastern University, Don Heiman, 6/9/ Accuracy versus Precision. 2. Errors

Experimental Competition May 7, :30-13:30 hours Marking Scheme

RLC Circuits. 1 Introduction. 1.1 Undriven Systems. 1.2 Driven Systems

Junior Laboratory. PHYC 307L, Spring Webpage:

Radioactivity: Experimental Uncertainty

EE 242 EXPERIMENT 8: CHARACTERISTIC OF PARALLEL RLC CIRCUIT BY USING PULSE EXCITATION 1

by A.Tonina*, R.Iuzzolino*, M.Bierzychudek* and M.Real* S. Solve + R. Chayramy + and M. Stock +

LAB 3: Capacitors & RC Circuits

Probability & Statistics: Introduction. Robert Leishman Mark Colton ME 363 Spring 2011

Lab 10: DC RC circuits

Uncertainty in Physical Measurements: Module 5 Data with Two Variables

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

by S. Solve +, R. Chayramy +, M. Stock +, D. Vlad*

Magnetic Fields. Experiment 1. Magnetic Field of a Straight Current-Carrying Conductor

Hall Coefficient of Germanium

EIE 240 Electrical and Electronic Measurements Class 2: January 16, 2015 Werapon Chiracharit. Measurement

Elementary charge and Millikan experiment Students worksheet

Introduction to Error Analysis

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Physics 8.02 Spring 2003 Experiment 17: RLC Circuit (modified 4/15/2003) OBJECTIVES

Protean Instrument Dutchtown Road, Knoxville, TN TEL/FAX:

Counting Statistics and Error Propagation!

Properties of Capacitors and its DC Behavior

Error Analysis. V. Lorenz L. Yang, M. Grosse Perdekamp, D. Hertzog, R. Clegg PHYS403 Spring 2016

EXPERIMENT 2 Reaction Time Objectives Theory

Computer 3. Lifetime Measurement

Modern Experimental Physics Introduction for Physics 401 students. Eugene V. Colla

AC Circuits Homework Set

ECE-340, Spring 2015 Review Questions

dn(t) dt where λ is the constant decay probability per unit time. The solution is N(t) = N 0 exp( λt)

POWER QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE. Version 4 October Power-Quality-Oct-2009-Version-4.doc Page 1 / 12

Data Analysis for University Physics

Data Analysis: phy122-bennett -1-8/26/02

Physics 2B Spring 2010: Final Version A 1 COMMENTS AND REMINDERS:

Alternating Current Circuits

Lab 4 CAPACITORS & RC CIRCUITS

Modern Experimental Physics Introduction for Physics 401 students. Fall 2017 Eugene V. Colla

University of TN Chattanooga Physics 1040L 8/18/2012 PHYSICS 1040L LAB LAB 4: R.C. TIME CONSTANT LAB

Lab 4 RC Circuits. Name. Partner s Name. I. Introduction/Theory

Experiment 3: Resonance in LRC Circuits Driven by Alternating Current

RLC Series Circuit. We can define effective resistances for capacitors and inductors: 1 = Capacitive reactance:

Introduction to Statistics and Error Analysis II

Computer simulation of radioactive decay

AE2160 Introduction to Experimental Methods in Aerospace

Introduction to Data Analysis

RC Circuit (Power amplifier, Voltage Sensor)

STATISTICS OF OBSERVATIONS & SAMPLING THEORY. Parent Distributions

Effective Lab Oral Report Spring 2018

5 Error Propagation We start from eq , which shows the explicit dependence of g on the measured variables t and h. Thus.

Chapter 1 - Basic Concepts. Measurement System Components. Sensor - Transducer. Signal-conditioning. Output. Feedback-control

Physics Labs with Computers, Vol. 1 P23: Conservation of Angular Momentum A

Discrete Simulation of Power Law Noise

Measurements of a Table

PROBLEMS FOR EXPERIMENT ES: ESTIMATING A SECOND Solutions

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department

( ) ( ) = q o. T 12 = τ ln 2. RC Circuits. 1 e t τ. q t

Experimental Uncertainty (Error) and Data Analysis

Simple circuits - 3 hr

Activity P60: Inverse Square Law Nuclear (Nuclear Sensor, Rotary Motion Sensor)

Lifetime Measurement

Capacitor ESR Measurement with Bode 100 and B-WIC

PHYSICS 122 Lab EXPERIMENT NO. 6 AC CIRCUITS

Old Dominion University Physics 112N/227N/232N Lab Manual, 13 th Edition

0 for all other times. Suppose further that we sample the signal with a sampling frequency f ;. We can write x # n =

Uncertainty and Bias UIUC, 403 Advanced Physics Laboratory, Fall 2014

The Photon Counting Histogram: Statistical Analysis of Single Molecule Populations

First Results from the Mesa Beam Profile Cavity Prototype

Capacitance Measurement

Experiment 1 Simple Measurements and Error Estimation

FINAL EXAM - Physics Patel SPRING 1998 FORM CODE - A

Physics 1050 Experiment 3. Force and Acceleration

Errors: What they are, and how to deal with them

Figure 1: Capacitor circuit

July 11, Capacitor CBL 23. Name Date: Partners: CAPACITORS. TI-83 calculator with unit-tounit. Resistor (about 100 kω) Wavetek multimeter

Compressible Gas Flow

Mostly Review. Phy 123L

OBJECTIVE: To understand the relation between electric fields and electric potential, and how conducting objects can influence electric fields.

Transcription:

Basic Error Analysis Physics 401 Spring 2015 Eugene V Colla

Errors and uncertainties The Reading Error Accuracy and precession Systematic and statistical errors Fitting errors Appendix. Working with oil drop data physics 401 2

T = 63 ±? Best guess T~0. 5 Wind speed 4mph±? Best guess ±0. 5mph physics 401 3

Clearance fit physics 401 4

Measurement of the speed of the light 1675 Ole Roemer: 220,000 Km/sec Does it make sense? What is missing? Ole Christensen Rømer 1644-1710 NIST Bolder Colorado c = 299,792,456.2±1.1 m/s. physics 401 5

L 0. 5mm L=53mm±ΔL(?) Acrylic rod L 0. 03mm How far we have to go in reducing the reading error? We do not care about accuracy better than 1mm If ruler is not okay, we need to use digital caliper Probably the natural limit of accuracy can be due to length uncertainty because of temperature expansion. For 53mm L 0. 012mm/K Reading Error = ± 1 2 (least count or minimum gradation). physics 401 6

Fluke 8845A multimeter Example Vdc (reading)=0.85v V = 0. 83 1. 8 10 5 +1. 0 0. 7 10 5 2. 2 10 5 = 22μV physics 401 7

The accuracy of an experiment is a measure of how close the result of the experiment comes to the true value Precision refers to how closely individual measurements agree with each other physics 401 8

physics 401 9

Systematic Error: reproducible inaccuracy introduced by faulty equipment, calibration or technique. Random errors: Indefiniteness of results due to finite precision of experiment. Measure of fluctuation in result after repeatable experimentation. Philip R. Bevington Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical sciences, McGraw-Hill, 1969 physics 401 10

Sources of systematic errors: poor calibration of the equipment, changes of environmental conditions, imperfect method of observation, drift and some offset in readings etc. Example #1: measuring of the DC voltage R in Current source I R U E off E off =f(time,temperature) expectation U=R*I U = actual result R I R R in 1 + R E off physics 401 R in 11

Example #3: poor calibration Measuring of the speed of the second sound in superfluid He4 20 Published data T l =2.17K 15 LHe Resonator U 2 (m/s) 10 P403 results T l =2.1K 10mA 5 HP34401A DMM 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 T (K) Temperature sensor physics 401 12

Result of measurement Systematic error X meas = X true + e s + e r Correct value Random error 0.35 B 0.35 e s B 0.30 0.25 e s =0 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.20 P 0.15 P 0.15 0.10 X true 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.00 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 X i 0.00 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 X X i true physics 401 13

) rt ) rt Pn t e n n! n 0,1,2,... r: decay rate [counts/s] t: time interval [s] P n (rt) : Probability to have n decays in time interval t Siméon Denis Poisson (1781-1840) P 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 rt=1 rt=4 rt=10 0 5 10 15 20 number of counts A statistical process is described through a Poisson Distribution if: o random process for a given nucleus probability for a decay to occur is the same in each time interval. o universal probability the probability to decay in a given time interval is same for all nuclei. o no correlation between two instances (the decay of on nucleus does not change the probability for a second nucleus to decay. physics 401 14

) rt ) rt Pn t e n n! n 0,1,2,... r: decay rate [counts/s] t: time interval [s] P n (rt) : Probability to have n decays in time interval t Properties of the Poisson distribution: 0.3 0.2 rt=10 < n >= rt σ = rt n n0 P ( rt) 1, probabilities sum to 1 P 0.1 n n P ( rt) rt, the mean n0 n 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 number of counts ( ) 2 n n P ( ), n0 n rt rt standard deviation physics 401 15

) rt ) rt Pn t e n n! n 0,1,2,... Poisson and Gaussian distributions 0.1 probability of occurence 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 10 20 30 40 "Poisson distribution" "Gaussian distribution" Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777 1855) number of counts 1 Pn ( x) e 2 ( xx) 2 2 2 Gaussian distribution: continuous physics 401 16

2 x 1 Pn ( x) e 2 ( xx) 2 2 2 Error in the mean is given as σ N physics 401 17

Source of noisy signal 4.89855 5.25111 2.93382 4.31753 4.67903 3.52626 4.12001 2.93411 Expected value 5V Actual measured values physics 401 18

10 100 10 4 10 6

Result U x c N - standard deviation N number of samples For N=10 6 U=4.999±0.001 0.02% accuracy

Ag b decay 40 20 800 600 Model 108 Ag t 1/2 =157s 110 Ag t 1/2 =24.6s ExpDec2 Equation y = A1*exp(-x/t1) + A2*exp(-x/t2) + y0 Residuals 0 Count 400 200 Reduced Chi-Sqr 1.43698 Adj. R-Square 0.96716 Value Standard Error C y0 0.02351 0.95435 C A1 104.87306 12.77612 C t1 177.75903 18.44979 C A2 710.01478 25.44606 C t2 30.32479 1.6525-20 0 50 100 150 time (s) 0 0 200 400 600 800 time (s) Count 20 Model Gauss Equation y=y0 + (A/(w*sq rt(pi/2)))*exp(-2 *((x-xc)/w)^2) Reduced Chi-S 4.77021 qr Adj. R-Square 0.93464 Value Standard Error Counts y0 1.44204 0.48702 Counts xc 1.49992 0.19171 Counts w 5.93398 0.40771 Counts A 219.24559 14.47587 Counts sigma 2.96699 Counts FWHM 6.98673 Counts Height 29.4798 t t y A1 exp A2 exp y t t 1 2 0 0-20 0 20 Residuals physics 401 21

40 Ag b decay Test 1. Fourier analysis 20 Residuals 0-20 0 50 100 150 time (s) Count 20 Model Gauss Equation y=y0 + (A/(w*sq rt(pi/2)))*exp(-2 *((x-xc)/w)^2) Reduced Chi-S 4.77021 qr Adj. R-Square 0.93464 Value Standard Error Counts y0 1.44204 0.48702 Counts xc 1.49992 0.19171 Counts w 5.93398 0.40771 Counts A 219.24559 14.47587 Counts sigma 2.96699 Counts FWHM 6.98673 Counts Height 29.4798 No pronounced frequencies found 0-20 0 20 Residuals physics 401 22

40 20 Ag b decay Test 1. Autocorrelation function Residuals 0-20 0 50 100 150 time (s) Count 20 Model Gauss Equation y=y0 + (A/(w*sq rt(pi/2)))*exp(-2 *((x-xc)/w)^2) Reduced Chi-S 4.77021 qr Adj. R-Square 0.93464 Value Standard Error Counts y0 1.44204 0.48702 Counts xc 1.49992 0.19171 Counts w 5.93398 0.40771 Counts A 219.24559 14.47587 Counts sigma 2.96699 Counts FWHM 6.98673 Counts Height 29.4798 Correlation function M 1 y( m) f ( n) g( n m) n0 0-20 0 20 Residuals autocorrelation function M 1 y( m) f ( n) f ( n m) n0 physics 401 23

Ag b decay Clear experiment Data + noise t 1 (s) 177.76 145.89 t 2 (s) 30.32 27.94 physics 401 24

Ag b decay Histogram does not follow the normal distribution and there is frequency of 0.333 is present in spectrum physics 401 25

Ag b decay Autocorrelation function Conclusion: fitting function should be modified by adding an additional term: t t y( t) y A exp A exp A3 sin( t ) t t 0 1 2 1 2 physics 401 26

FFT autocorrelation Clear experiment Data + noise Modified fitting t 1 (s) 177.76 145.89 172.79 t 2 (s) 30.32 27.94 30.17 physics 401 27

y = f(x1, x2... xn) 2 n f 2 i i i i1 xi f ( x, x ) x 1.15 f(x i ) f±fx 1.10 x i ± x i 1 1.5 x i physics 401 28

Derive resonance frequency f from measured inductance L± L and capacitance C± C L 1 1 f ( L, C) 2 LC 10 1mH, C 10 2μF 1 1 2 2 f f f ( L, C, L, C) L C L C 2 2 f L f C 1 C 4 1 3 2 2 L 1 L C 4 1 3 2 2 ; Results: f(l 1,C 1 )=503.29212104487Hz f=56.26977hz f(l 1,C 1 )=503.3±56.3Hz physics 401 29

time In general we could expect both components of errors Q meas = Q true + e s + e r e s - systematic error comes from uncertainties of plates separation distance, applied DC voltage, ambient temperature etc. V =V DC ±V, d=d 0 ±d e r - random errors are related to uncertainty of the knowledge of the actual t g and t rise. Uncertainty of time of crossing the marker line. It is random. physics 401 30

3 3 1 9d 2 x 1 1 1 Q F S T 32 fc V g t t g g t rise 2 2 2 2 2 2 ) ) ) Q S T F F T S F S T T 1 1 1 t t g g t rise 2 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 T t t t t t t t 2 2 5 2 3 2 g 1 2 2 rise g g rise g rise physics 401 31

Step 1. Collect your data + parameters of the experiment in: \\Phyaplportal\PHYCS401\Common\Origin templates\oil drop experiment\section L1.opj Use different columns for each student or team. This Origin project is for data collecting only but not for data analysis. For data analysis you have to copy these data and experiment parameters obtained by different students/team and paste it in one in your personal Origin project. Setup and environmental parameters physics 401 Raw data 32

Step 2. Working on personal Origin project Make a copy of the Millikan1 project to your personal folder and open it Prepare equations calculations of data in next columns (Set column values ). Switch Recalculate in Auto mode Paste these 5 parameters and raw data from Section L1-L4.opj projects Calculate manually the actual air viscosity physics 401 33

Millikan oil drop experiment Step 3. Histogram graph First use the data from the column with drop charges and plot the histogram physics 401 34

Step 4. Histogram. Bin size Millikan oil drop experiment Origin will automatically but not optimally adjust the bin size h. In tis page figure h=0.5. There are several theoretical approaches how to find the optimal bin size. 3. 5σ h = n 1/3 Is the sample standard deviation and n is total number of observation. For presented in Fig.1 results good value of h ~0.1 physics 401 35

Step 4. Histogram. Bin size Millikan oil drop experiment To change the bin size click on graph and unplug the Automatic Binning option Bin size in this histogram is 0.1 physics 401 36

Step 4. Multipeak Gaussian fitting Millikan oil drop experiment To do this you have to add an extra plot to the graph Counts vs. Bin Center physics 401 37

Step 4. Multipeak Gaussian fitting Millikan oil drop experiment This plot can be used for peak fitting. physics 401 38

Step 4. Multipeak Gaussian fitting Millikan oil drop experiment This plot can be used for peak fitting. Final result for first two peaks: Q/e=0.93±0.01 Q/e=1.87±0.02 This pretty close to e and 2e Here w = 2 and error of the mean = σ N physics 401 39