A posteriori multiple comparison tests

Similar documents
Multiple Comparison Procedures Cohen Chapter 13. For EDUC/PSY 6600

Introduction. Chapter 8

Multiple t Tests. Introduction to Analysis of Variance. Experiments with More than 2 Conditions

Multiple Comparisons

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE OF BALANCED DAIRY SCIENCE DATA USING SAS

H0: Tested by k-grp ANOVA

STAT 5200 Handout #7a Contrasts & Post hoc Means Comparisons (Ch. 4-5)

Lec 1: An Introduction to ANOVA

H0: Tested by k-grp ANOVA

Multiple Testing. Gary W. Oehlert. January 28, School of Statistics University of Minnesota

Hypothesis T e T sting w ith with O ne O One-Way - ANOV ANO A V Statistics Arlo Clark Foos -

Laboratory Topics 4 & 5

One-way ANOVA. Experimental Design. One-way ANOVA

Linear Combinations. Comparison of treatment means. Bruce A Craig. Department of Statistics Purdue University. STAT 514 Topic 6 1

These are all actually contrasts (the coef sum to zero). What are these contrasts representing? What would make them large?

Chapter 6 Planned Contrasts and Post-hoc Tests for one-way ANOVA

Your schedule of coming weeks. One-way ANOVA, II. Review from last time. Review from last time /22/2004. Create ANOVA table

Multiple Comparison Methods for Means

More about Single Factor Experiments

One-way between-subjects ANOVA. Comparing three or more independent means

Chapter Seven: Multi-Sample Methods 1/52

B. Weaver (18-Oct-2006) MC Procedures Chapter 1: Multiple Comparison Procedures ) C (1.1)

Group comparison test for independent samples

The entire data set consists of n = 32 widgets, 8 of which were made from each of q = 4 different materials.

13: Additional ANOVA Topics. Post hoc Comparisons

An Old Research Question

COMPARING SEVERAL MEANS: ANOVA

One-Way ANOVA Source Table J - 1 SS B / J - 1 MS B /MS W. Pairwise Post-Hoc Comparisons of Means

STAT22200 Spring 2014 Chapter 5


Introduction to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Part 2

Presented to the Graduate Council of the. North Texas State University. in Partial. Fulfillment of the Requirements. For the Degree of.

PLSC PRACTICE TEST ONE

Orthogonal contrasts and multiple comparisons

The One-Way Independent-Samples ANOVA. (For Between-Subjects Designs)

Garvan Ins)tute Biosta)s)cal Workshop 16/7/2015. Tuan V. Nguyen. Garvan Ins)tute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia

Multiple Testing. Tim Hanson. January, Modified from originals by Gary W. Oehlert. Department of Statistics University of South Carolina

Analysis of variance

1 One-way Analysis of Variance

Comparing Several Means: ANOVA

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

Parametric Analysis of Variance

Lecture 5: Comparing Treatment Means Montgomery: Section 3-5

One-way between-subjects ANOVA. Comparing three or more independent means

Specific Differences. Lukas Meier, Seminar für Statistik

Linear Combinations of Group Means

9 One-Way Analysis of Variance

Unit 12: Analysis of Single Factor Experiments

Descriptions of post-hoc tests

The One-Way Repeated-Measures ANOVA. (For Within-Subjects Designs)

T-test: means of Spock's judge versus all other judges 1 12:10 Wednesday, January 5, judge1 N Mean Std Dev Std Err Minimum Maximum

DETAILED CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS. 1. Introduction to Statistics

ANOVA Multiple Comparisons

Week 14 Comparing k(> 2) Populations

N J SS W /df W N - 1

BIOL Biometry LAB 6 - SINGLE FACTOR ANOVA and MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURES

Introduction to the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Computing One-Way Independent Measures (Between Subjects) ANOVAs

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

PSYC 331 STATISTICS FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS

SEVERAL μs AND MEDIANS: MORE ISSUES. Business Statistics

Hypothesis testing: Steps

Tukey Complete Pairwise Post-Hoc Comparison

Independent Samples ANOVA

CHAPTER 10 ONE-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE. It would be very unusual for all the research one might conduct to be restricted to

2 Hand-out 2. Dr. M. P. M. M. M c Loughlin Revised 2018

COMPARISON OF MEANS OF SEVERAL RANDOM SAMPLES. ANOVA

Analysis of Variance

Aquatic Toxicology Lab 10 Pimephales promelas Larval Survival and Growth Test Data Analysis 1. Complete test initiated last week 1.

Outline. Topic 19 - Inference. The Cell Means Model. Estimates. Inference for Means Differences in cell means Contrasts. STAT Fall 2013

Hypothesis testing: Steps

Keppel, G. & Wickens, T. D. Design and Analysis Chapter 12: Detailed Analyses of Main Effects and Simple Effects

Factorial Independent Samples ANOVA

Analysis of Variance

Keppel, G. & Wickens, T. D. Design and Analysis Chapter 4: Analytical Comparisons Among Treatment Means

Group comparison test for independent samples

Preview from Notesale.co.uk Page 3 of 63

ANOVA: Analysis of Variation

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

n i n T Note: You can use the fact that t(.975; 10) = 2.228, t(.95; 10) = 1.813, t(.975; 12) = 2.179, t(.95; 12) =

(Foundation of Medical Statistics)

Mean Comparisons PLANNED F TESTS

CHL 5225H Advanced Statistical Methods for Clinical Trials: Multiplicity

Multiple Pairwise Comparison Procedures in One-Way ANOVA with Fixed Effects Model

Chapter 14. One-Way Analysis of Variance for Independent Samples Part 2

Contrasts (in general)

c 2011 Kuo-mei Chen ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

26:010:557 / 26:620:557 Social Science Research Methods

Multiple comparisons The problem with the one-pair-at-a-time approach is its error rate.

4.1 Example: Exercise and Glucose

Biological Applications of ANOVA - Examples and Readings

Lecture Notes #3: Contrasts and Post Hoc Tests 3-1

Comparisons among means (or, the analysis of factor effects)

Why ANOVA? Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) One-Way ANOVA F-Test. One-Way ANOVA F-Test. One-Way ANOVA F-Test. Completely Randomized Design

MATH Notebook 3 Spring 2018

Analysis of Variance: Repeated measures

Pairwise multiple comparisons are easy to compute using SAS Proc GLM. The basic statement is:

One-Way ANOVA. Some examples of when ANOVA would be appropriate include:

Comparing the means of more than two groups

Contrasts and Multiple Comparisons Supplement for Pages

Analysis of Variance

Transcription:

A posteriori multiple comparison tests 11/15/16 1

Recall the Lakes experiment Source of variation SS DF MS F P Lakes 58.000 2 29.400 8.243 0.006 Error 42.800 12 3.567 Total 101.600 14 The ANOVA tells us that there are differences in average fish length among levels of factor Lakes (p<0.05). Factor Lakes has three levels (Lake 1, Lake 2 and Lake 3) Which Lakes are different? Note that there are several possibilities! Are they all different? Is Lake 1 different from Lake 2 which, in turn, is equal to Lake 3? 11/15/16 2

Recall the Lakes experiment Source of variation SS DF MS F P Lakes 58.000 2 29.400 8.243 0.006 Error 42.800 12 3.567 Total 101.600 14 The ANOVA avoids Type I Error inflation when analyzing simultaneously more than two samples. However, in its simpler form, it does not give any detail on particular differences among levels However, we can be confident (with an error rate of 0.05) that some of the levels are really different 11/15/16 3

A posteriori Multiple Comparison Tests These type of tests is used when we have no a priori knowledge of the type of differences that are expected They work like multiple t-tests but take advantage of the results of ANOVA (e.g., the estimated Error or Within Samples variation) They are prone to Type I error inflation, but try to avoid that by specific strategies (algorithms) There is a plethora of tests to choose from! See Day & Quinn (1998) Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecological Monographs. 51(4): 433-463 11/15/16 4

A posteriori Multiple Comparison Tests Student-Neuman-Keuls test (SNK) Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) Fisher Protected Least Significant Difference (LSD) Duncan Multiple Range test (Duncan) Ryan s test Peritz s test Scheffé s test Dunnett s test Sequential Bonferroni Correction Dunnet s T3 test (rank based) Dunnet s C test (rank based) Games-Howell test (rank based)... 11/15/16 5

Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) The basic formula is very simple, similar to a t-test, but uses MS error instead of the variances of the samples 11/15/16 6

Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) 1 - First of all, compute the averages for each sample n Average Variance Lake 1 5 13.2 1.7 Lake 2 5 15.0 3.5 Lake 3 5 18.0 5.5 11/15/16 7

Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) 2 Order the averages in ascending or descending order (it doesn t matter) n Average Variance Lake 1 5 13.2 1.7 Lake 2 5 15.0 3.5 Lake 3 5 18.0 5.5 Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 11/15/16 8

Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) 3 Get the MS error, DF error and n from the ANOVA Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 MS Error = 3.567 DF Error = 12 n = 5 11/15/16 9

Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) 4 Compare the two most extreme averages using the formula of Q Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 MS Error = 3.567 DF Error = 12 n = 5 Q obs = 5.6829 11/15/16 10

Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) 4 Obtain a critical value for the distribution of Q with k=3 means and ν = DF error = 12 degrees of freedom Q obs = 5.6829 q [3,12] = 3.773 5 If the observed Q is larger than q crit, then the two means differ Lake 1 Lake 3 11/15/16 11

Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) 6 Now repeat these steps for Lake 1 vs. Lake 2 and Lake 2 vs. Lake 3, simultaneously maintaining q crit For Lake 2 vs. Lake 3 Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 MS Error = 3.567 DF Error = 12 n = 5 Q obs < q crit q [3,12] = 3.773 Lake 2 = Lake 3 11/15/16 12

Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) 6 Now repeat these steps for Lake 1 vs. Lake 2 and Lake 2 vs. Lake 3, simultaneously maintaining q crit For Lake 1 vs. Lake 2 Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 MS Error = 4.167 DF Error = 12 n = 5 Q obs < q crit q [3,12] = 3.773 Lake 1 = Lake 2 11/15/16 13

Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 The multiple test is inconclusive! The most likely reason for such outcome is the lack of power You should repeat the analysis with larger sample sizes (n) 11/15/16 14

Student-Neuman-Keuls test (SNK) 1 - First of all, compute the averages for each sample n Average Variance Lake 1 5 13.2 1.7 Lake 2 5 15.0 3.5 Lake 3 5 18.0 5.5 11/15/16 15

Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD or Tukey) 2 Order the averages in ascending or descending order (it doesn t matter) n Average Variance Lake 1 5 13.2 1.7 Lake 2 5 15.0 3.5 Lake 3 5 18.0 5.5 Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 11/15/16 16

Student-Neuman-Keuls test (SNK) 3 Get the MS error, DF error and n from the ANOVA Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 MS Error = 3.567 DF Error = 12 n = 5 11/15/16 17

Student-Neuman-Keuls test (SNK) 4 Compare the two most extreme averages using the formula of Q Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 MS Error = 3.567 DF Error = 12 n = 5 Q obs = 5.6829 11/15/16 18

Student-Neuman-Keuls test (SNK) 4 Obtain a critical value for the distribution of Q with k=3 means and ν = DF error = 12 degrees of freedom Q obs = 5.6829 q [3,12] = 3.773 5 If the observed Q is larger than q crit, then the two means differ Lake 1 Lake 3 11/15/16 19

Student-Neuman-Keuls test (SNK) 6 Now repeat these steps for Lake 1 vs. Lake 2 and Lake 2 vs. Lake 3, simultaneously, but use a q crit for two means instead of three For Lake 2 vs. Lake 3 Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 MS Error = 3.567 DF Error = 12 n = 5 Q obs > q crit q [2,12] = 3.082 Lake 2 Lake 3 11/15/16 20

Student-Neuman-Keuls test (SNK) 6 Now repeat these steps for Lake 1 vs. Lake 2 and Lake 2 vs. Lake 3, simultaneously, but use a q crit for two means instead of three For Lake 1 vs. Lake 2 Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 MS Error = 3.567 DF Error = 12 n = 5 Q obs < q crit Lake 1 = Lake 2 q [2,12] = 3.082 11/15/16 21

Student-Neuman-Keuls test (SNK) Lake1 Lake2 Lake3 The multiple test is conclusive! There are two homogeneous groups: Lake 1 and Lake 2 (they do not differ) Lake 3 (which differs from the group above) 11/15/16 22