Simulations of MPD Straw End-Cap Tracker. Jan Fedorishin, XXII International Baldin Seminar on High Energy Physics Problems, September 19, 2014

Similar documents
Tracking properties of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT)

pp physics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker

RTPC Simulation Studies for Tagged Deep Inelastic Experiment. Rachel Montgomery SBS Collaboration Meeting, Jefferson Lab, 22/07/16

Ionization Detectors. Mostly Gaseous Detectors

A Complete Simulation of a Triple-GEM Detector

EP228 Particle Physics

Near detector tracker concepts. D. Karlen / U. Vic. & TRIUMF T2K ND280m meeting August 22, 2004

A complete simulation of a triple-gem detector

3. Gas Detectors General introduction

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 25. Particle Detectors

A Triple-GEM Telescope for the TOTEM Experiment

Tracking detectors for the LHC. Peter Kluit (NIKHEF)

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

Performance of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker in Run 1 of the LHC: tracker properties

The outline. 1) Detector parameters: efficiency, geometrical acceptance, dead-time, resolution, linearity. 2) gaseous ionization chambers

7 Particle Identification. Detectors for Particle Physics Manfred Krammer Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna, Austria

Expected Performance of the ATLAS Inner Tracker at the High-Luminosity LHC

Simulation of J/ψ detection via electron-positron decay

Microscopic Simulation of GEM Signals

Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector. Oscar Estrada Pastor (IFIC-CSIC)

Spatial resolution of a MPGD TPC using the charge dispersion signal

Theory English (Official)

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Status of the PANDA TPC simulation software

Radioactivity. PC1144 Physics IV. 1 Objectives. 2 Equipment List. 3 Theory

Performance of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker in Run 1 of the LHC: tracker properties

Simulation of GEM-TPC Prototype for the Super-FRS Beam Diagnostics System at FAIR

Space Charge Effects in Resistive Plate Chambers

Transverse momentum spectra using the Inner Tracking System of the ALICE experiment at LHC

Cosmic Muons and the Cosmic Challenge. data taken with B 3.5Tesla, red lines are reconstructed chamber segments

Detectors in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. RHIG summer student meeting June 2014

for the ALICE Collaboration V Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Trieste - September,

PoS(Baldin ISHEPP XXI)004

Resolution. σ z. = σ z. If D(z) is gaussian the relation between FWHM and standard deviation is. = Δz 2.36

Generic Detector. Layers of Detector Systems around Collision Point

Detectors for Particle Physics. Lecture 2: Drift detectors Muon detectors MWPC, CSC, RPC, TRT, TPC, Cherenkov

Outline, measurement of position

Ionization Detectors

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

PoS(RPC2012)034. Simulation studies on the Effect of SF 6 in the RPC gas mixture

Near Detector Tracker. Dean Karlen / U. Victoria & TRIUMF NP04 Neutrino Session - KEK August 25, 2004

Detailed performance of the Outer Tracker at LHCb

Study of the Optimum Momentum Resolution in the. CMS Muon System

Experimental Particle Physics

The LHC Experiments. TASI Lecture 2 John Conway

The ATLAS Detector - Inside Out Julia I. Hofmann

Studies of charmonium production in e + e - annihilation and B decays at BaBar

CALICE scintillator HCAL

PHYS 3446 Lecture #12

1.5 TeV Muon Collider background rejection in ILCroot Si VXD and Tracker (summary report)

Cross Section of Exclusive π Electro-production from Neutron. Jixie Zhang (CLAS Collaboration) Old Dominion University Sep. 2009

The ultimate resolution drift chamber

Tracking at the LHC. Pippa Wells, CERN

PoS(Bormio2012)013. K 0 production in pp and pnb reactions. Jia-Chii Berger-Chen

Momentum measurement. Multiple scattering Bethe-Bloch formula / Landau tails Ionization of gases Wire chambers. Drift and diffusion in gases

Detector Physics of Resistive Plate Chambers

Experimental Particle Physics

Study of MDT calibration constants using H8 testbeam data of year 2004

Tracking with Straw Tubes in the PANDA Experiment

Hybrid Gaseous Detector Module for CEPC-TPC

Particle Detectors. Summer Student Lectures 2010 Werner Riegler, CERN, History of Instrumentation History of Particle Physics

Experimental Methods of Particle Physics

Dario Barberis Evaluation of GEANT4 electromagnetic physics in ATLAS

GEM at CERN. Leszek Ropelewski CERN PH-DT2 DT2-ST & TOTEM

Transition Radiation Detector for GlueX

Lecture 4. Detectors for Ionizing Particles

Dual readout with tiles for calorimetry.

PoS(Vertex 2016)004. ATLAS IBL operational experience

Studies of Cylindrical Drift Chamber for COMET Phase-I

Momentum Measurement in B Field. Part II. Relative Momentum Error. Contribution from Multiple Scattering

Solid State Detectors

Latest Results from the OPERA Experiment (and new Charge Reconstruction)

B. Sitar G. I. Merso n V. A. Chechin Yu. A. Budagov. Ionization Measurement s in High Energy Physics

A proposal to study gas gain fluctuations in Micromegas detectors

Les Premières Données dans ATLAS et le Calorimètre à Argon Liquide

Missing Transverse Energy. Performance with CMS

Gamma-Ray Polarimetry in the Pair Production Regime

Results with Micromegas modules at LP-TPC

FATRAS. A Novel Fast Track Simulation Engine for the ATLAS Experiment. Sebastian Fleischmann on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration

Components of a generic collider detector

Track measurement in the high multiplicity environment at the CBM Experiment

Part II. Momentum Measurement in B Field. Contribution from Multiple Scattering. Relative Momentum Error

Status and Challenges of CEPC Time Projection Chamber Detector. Huirong On behalf of CEPC Tracking Subgroup

The Dual-Phase Liquid Xenon Time Projection Chamber (TPC) of Münster

Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector tracking system

Improvement of Spatial Resolution by Selfconsistent Full Muon Track Reconstruction in Gaseous Detectors

Experimental Particle Physics

Calorimetry I Electromagnetic Calorimeters

An estimation of the effective number of electrons contributing to the coordinate measurement with a TPC II

A fast introduction to the tracking and to the Kalman filter. Alberto Rotondi Pavia

Electromagnetic calorimeters of the CMD-3 detector

Particle Identification with Ionization Energy Loss in the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker

Simulating the Charge Dispersion Phenomena in Micro Pattern Gas Detectors with a Resistive Anode

Chap. 5 Ion Chambers the electroscope

Nuclear and Particle Physics 4b Physics of the Quark Gluon Plasma

Dr. Nidal M. Ershaidat Dr. Nidal M. Ershaidat - Nuclear Techniques - Chapter 5: Gas-Filled Detectors 2

Track reconstruction for the Mu3e experiment Alexandr Kozlinskiy (Mainz, KPH) for the Mu3e collaboration DPG Würzburg (.03.22, T85.

Commissioning of the ATLAS LAr Calorimeter

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)232. Performance of a 1 m 2 Micromegas Detector Using Argon and Neon based Drift Gases

Transcription:

Simulations of MPD Straw End-Cap Tracker Jan Fedorishin, XXII International Baldin Seminar on High Energy Physics Problems, September 19, 2014

MPD the current layout

z Straw End-Cap Tracker (ECT) module structure x y 100 cm module = 5 submodules } submodule = 6 layers layer = 600 kapton tubes } 3 72 10 channels 30 cm r tube = 2 mm 280 (220) cm anode voltage V A =1650 V

GEANT simulations with UrQMD Au+Au collisons at s NN = 9 GeV the detector occupancy estimation 12% multiple hits occur in 0.5% of all tubes, i.e. in about 3 tubes (out of 600) per layer

Simulations with GARFIELD++ - object-oriented program toolkit for the detailed simulations of particle detectors which use a gas mixture or a semiconductor material as sensitive medium - described at http://cern.ch/garfieldpp - provides interface also to other simulation programs such as HEED, Magboltz, Ansys, Synopsys Sentaurus,... - simulates sensitive media, electric and magnetic fields, ionization by charged particles, charge transport (drift of electrons and ions under the influence of electric and magnetic fields), signals induced on electrodes

Signal simulation consists of a few partial tasks 1.) Primary charge generation (distribution of electron-ion clusters along particle path in active detector volume) 2.) Drift of primary charge towards the electrodes, avalanche near the anode, gas amplification (the magnetic field neglected) 3.) Anode signal simulation }Hit simulation, based on GARFIELD output Signal analysis: particle coordinates determination (tracking), energy loss estimation?)

Cluster generation basic cluster properties: mean number of electron clusters/cm number of electrons per cluster Both the characteristics depend on the working gas properties (chemical composition, pressure, temperature). They also depend on particle type and momentum.

Probability to create k clusters on path d inside a tube is described by Poisson distribution: p λ (k )=λ k exp( λ)/k! λ=ρd where ρ is a mean number of clusters per cm. Inverse 1/ρ is then a mean free path of particle in tube volume. Spatial distribution of clusters on path d is in general obtained as a chain of consecutive exponential probabilities: 1 ρ exp( lρ) If 1/ρ d, the distribution of clusters can be regarded as uniform.

Number of electrons per cluster shown example of probability distributions for π - at momentum 250 MeV/c maximum at 1 electron/cluster,, mean at 3 electrons/cluster for all the studied particles Yet, occasionally even large electron cluster may appear.

Electron drift simulation drift time as a function of radial distance from anode (t max 30 ns) drift time fluctuations

Electron attachment Some electrons are captured by gas molecules while drifting to the anode. almost 20% of the primary charge is lost

Gas gain - multiplication factor of the avalanche mean gas gain 3 10 4 (for primary electrons originated in the drift region)

The fluctuations of gas gain G are described by Polya distribution: p θ (G)= 1 G 0 (θ+1) (θ+1) Γ (θ+1) ( G G 0 )θ exp ( (θ+1) G ) G 0 θ+1= G 0, where 2 σ G 2 and G 0 is a mean gas gain.

Anode signals Ramo-Shockley theorem: i ind (t)= q v E w ( r ) i ind (t) the electric current induced by charge q moving at a velocity v at a radial distance r from the anode E w (r) weighting field (produced by unit potential applied to the anode and 0 to the cathode)

spikey short-lived electron signal Two types of anode signals long tailed ion signal (maximal ion drift time 40 μs)

Examples of anode signals far from the wire close to the wire

Fig. Distribution of the anode charge - anode current integrated over 60 ns time interval (collection time) The anode charge is contributed mainly by ions (follows from Ramo-Shockley formula).

Calibration method estimation of particle DCA coordinate (DCA distance of closest approach to the anode wire) The calibration metod is applicable providing the straw tubes are illuminated uniformly and the efficiency is constant over the tube volumes. The method uses as input the spectra dn/dt min of minimal drift times obtained for many straw tubes (from many events).

Fig. Spectrum of minimal drift times Added white Gaussian noise with amplitude equal to 3% of maximum electric current value. The threshold is then set to 5 times higher value to get rid of the noise. - can be fitted by the higher-order polynomial

Isochronous radius-time relation is estimated as: r(t)= r t max N 0 tot dn dt ' dt ' where N tot is the total number of tracks. The radius-time relation is approximated by higher-order polynomial which is then used as a calibration curve converting the measured drift times to radii.

Dca resolution: σ 250 (300) μm, HWHM 100 μm. The obtained values are very sensitive to the noise and threshold levels. The coordinates are later improved in the tracking procedure (the autocalibration method).

Conlusions: 1. Response of the MPD Straw End-Cap Tracker has been estimated employing FAIRROOT, GEANT3, GARFIELD and the hit simulation and reconstruction programs; 2. The detector characteristics that have been estimated: the occupancy, the charge clusters distributions and energy losses, drift properties (electron and ion drift times, electron attachment probabilities, drift and lavina regions), gas gain (mean and variation), anode signals, the integrated anode charges; 3. The calibration method has been used to estimate hit distance of closest approach coordinates. The DCA resolution varies from 100 μm to 300 μm depending on the radial distance from anode wire. 4. The results are found compatible with the results from other HEP experiments employing straw tube detectors, e.g. PANDA and ATLAS. 5. The obtained results are necessary to proceed to the track reconstruction.

Backup slides

3 types of layers: 1.) radial tubes; 2.) tubes inclined by angle α=+7 ; 3.) tubes inclined by angle α=-7 with respect to radial tubes.

GEANT particles: e -, e +, μ -, μ +, π -, π +, K -, K +, p, p, Σ -, Σ +, d, He 3, triton, α GARFIELD particles: e -, e +, μ -, μ +, π -, π +, K -, K +, p, p, d i.e. some of the GEANT particles have no GARFIELD counterparts Therefore instead of the missing GARFIELD particles, the available particles with similar properties are used: He 3, triton, α d; Σ - (Σ + ) p (p)

Dependence of number of electrons/cluster on particle momenta - shown MC spectra for e - and π - The spectra of most particles under study show dependence only at low momenta (up to 100-150 MeV/c) except for e -, e +, where a weak dependence is observed only at the lowest momenta (up to 20 MeV/c).

How to check if our simulations of primary charge are all right? Basic check: the energy losses corresponding to the primary charges generated in straw tubes should match the energy losses from GEANT The conversion of primary charge q to energy losses de/dx is: de dx =n q E min, where n q is a number of electrons (ions) with total charge q and E min is minimal energy needed to ionize gas. In our case, E min 27.5 ev.

The attention must be turned to ions. Fig. Ion drift time vs complementary straw tube radius r max -r, where r max is tube radius. The maximal drift time is about 40 μs (for ions coming from the lavina region). However, the integration (collection) time for anode charge is much lower (60 ns).

If charge q moves from point x 0 to point x 1, the induced charge is: Q ind = q V w [Ψ (x 1 ) Ψ(x 0 )], where V w is anode voltage (1650 V) and Ψ(x) is a potential of weighting field. After all the ions and electrons reach the corresponding electrodes, the anode total induced charged Q ind =q electrons. Q electrons =q electrons[ 1 Ψ (x 0) V w ] Q ions =q electrons Ψ(x 0 ) V w If x 0 r min (anode radius), Ψ(x 0 ) V w Q electrons 0, Q ions q electrons i. e. most of the induced anode charge comes from ions.