*Anne Carter Witt Matt Heller

Similar documents
Monitoring and Characterization of the Meadowview Lane Landslide: Boyd County, KY

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

Landslide Computer Modeling Potential

Interpretive Map Series 24

Sediment and sedimentary rocks Sediment

Natural hazards in Glenorchy Summary Report May 2010

August 31, 2006 Embankment Failure Debris Flow at the Cascades Development Haywood County, North Carolina. Introduction. Findings

=%REPORT RECONNAISSANCE OF CHISHOLM LAKE PROSPECT. October 25, 1977

THE NEW DNR LANDSLIDE HAZARDS PROGRAM

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Date of Report: EPA agreement number: Center Name and Institution of Ctr. Director: Identifier used by Center for Project: Title of Project:

Practical reliability approach to urban slope stability

J.H. Campbell Generating Facility Pond A - Location Restriction Certification Report

2014 Summer Training Courses on Slope Land Disaster Reduction Hydrotech Research Institute, National Taiwan University, Taiwan August 04-15, 2014

Geo-hazard Potential Mapping Using GIS and Artificial Intelligence

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

Gateway Trail Project

Response on Interactive comment by Anonymous Referee #1

Eagle Creek Post Fire Erosion Hazard Analysis Using the WEPP Model. John Rogers & Lauren McKinney

SLOPE FAILURE SLOPES. Landslides, Mudflows, Earthflows, and other Mass Wasting Processes

Introduction. Inventory Mapping and Characterization of Landslides Using LiDAR

INTRODUCTION. Climate

Flood Inundation Mapping

Understanding Earth Fifth Edition

Pierce Cedar Creek Institute GIS Development Final Report. Grand Valley State University

Sediments and. Sedimentary Rocks

Hydraulic Impacts of Limestone Quarries and Gravel Pits. Jeff Green Minnesota DNR-Division of Ecological & Water Resources

Soil Surveys. What are the most important properties to consider in a taxonomic system used for making a soil survey?

Geology and New England Landscapes

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix E. River Corridor Delineation Process. VT Agency of Natural Resources. April, E0 - April, 2004

Using Weather and Climate Information for Landslide Prevention and Mitigation

Urban Erosion Potential Risk Mapping with GIS

Landslides & Debris Flows

A Roundup of Recent Debris Flow Events in Taiwan

Landscapes Prone to Rockfall, Rockslides, Debris Avalanches, Flows, and Torrents

American Institute of Professional Geologists South Dakota Section

Module 10: Resources and Virginia Geology Topic 4 Content: Virginia Geology Notes

Debris flow: categories, characteristics, hazard assessment, mitigation measures. Hariklia D. SKILODIMOU, George D. BATHRELLOS

Geology 101. Reading Guides for Chapters 5 and 14 Weathering: the Breakdown of Rocks (p. 142)

Geospatial Approach for Delineation of Landslide Susceptible Areas in Karnaprayag, Chamoli district, Uttrakhand, India

MINISTRY OF FORESTS, LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCE OPERATIONS, POST-WILDFIRE RISK ANALYSIS PRELIMINARY REPORT

Evaluation of Landslide Hazard Assessment Models at Regional Scale (SciNet NatHazPrev Project)

ASFPM - Rapid Floodplain Mapping

Mass Wasting. Revisit: Erosion, Transportation, and Deposition

Page 1. Name:

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

Sediment and Sedimentary rock

ESRI GIS For Mining Seminar, 10 th August, 2016, Nairobi, Kenya. Spatial DATA Solutions for Mining

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Rogun Hydropower Project

APPALACHIAN COLLUVIAL

Geo 327G Semester Project. Landslide Suitability Assessment of Olympic National Park, WA. Fall Shane Lewis

Figure 1 The map shows the top view of a meandering stream as it enters a lake. At which points along the stream are erosion and deposition dominant?

Which landscape best represents the shape of the valleys occupied by glaciers? A) B) C) D)

Starting at Rock Bottom

Dealing with Zone A Flood Zones. Topics of Discussion. What is a Zone A Floodplain?

Chapter 7 Mudflow Analysis

Maggie Payne Jim Turenne

The Effects of Hydraulic Structures on Streams Prone to Bank Erosion in an Intense Flood Event: A Case Study from Eastern Hokkaido

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

Chapter 16 Weathering, Erosion, Mass Wasting. Chapter 16 Weathering, Erosion, Mass Wasting. Mechanical Weathering

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

Appendix C. Questionnaire Summary of Responses Geographic Information Systems

Assessment of regional rainfall-induced landslides using 3S-based hydro-geological model

ENGRG Introduction to GIS

EROSION AND DEPOSITION

New Topic Today. Mass Movement = Mass Wasting. =colluvial processes =slope processes =slope failures =LANDSLIDES. Landslides by U.S.

KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007

Existing NWS Flash Flood Guidance

Climatic Change Implications for Hydrologic Systems in the Sierra Nevada

July 21, 2018

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY. Landslides by U.S. Region. WV Has 1st or 2nd Highest Landslide Damage Per Capita $ /person/yr UTAH

Objectives. Introduction to Soils. Terms to know: What is soil? Study of Soils. The Soil Body 11/9/2012

Clyde River Landslide

HILLSLOPE STABILITY. Focus in the Westfork Area of Washington County, Arkansas. Environmental Geology Dr. Paul Lowrey

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth

Geology 101. Reading Guides for Chapters 6 and 12

Jim Turenne. Soils on Social Media

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

NATURAL SOIL DEPOSITS

ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF THE STANLEY MINE ADVENTURE PARK AREA CLEAR CREEK COUNTY, COLORADO. Prepared for:

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Research e-issn No.: , Date: April, 2016

Using LiDAR to Map Landslides in Kenton and Campbell Counties, Kentucky. Matthew M. Crawford

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

Exhibit RMP-4. Foote Creek Geology and Topography

GEOL.3250 Geology for Engineers Glacial Geology

INTERV AL SHEET. VDMR Well No.: WELL NO. 699 WWCR #186. Oil Gas, Water_ X,Exp1oratory. From- To 300_ _ _ _

1. The map below shows a meandering river. A A' is the location of a cross section. The arrows show the direction of the river flow.

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

UPDATING THE LANDSLIDE HAZARD ASSESSMENT SYSTEM WITHIN THE CITY OF THE GOLD COAST

Chapter 7 Mudflow Analysis

Chapter 2. Regional Landscapes and the Hydrologic Cycle

NC Earth Science Essential Standards

GG101 Lecture 22: Mass Wasting. Soil, debris, sediment, and broken rock is called regolith.

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT

A METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED LANDSLIDE RISK. Agency for the Environmental Protection, ITALY (

Springshed Springshed Management Training Curriculum

The Importance of Mass Wasting

Transcription:

*Anne Carter Witt Matt Heller Division of Geology and Mineral Resources, Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy, 900 Natural Resources Drive, Suite 500, Charlottesville, VA 22903 anne.witt@dmme.virginia.gov

Harrisonburg Project is funded by FEMA through a VDEM managed hazard mitigation grant Part of this funding also supports research and field work by JMU faculty and students to estimate volume in colluvial hollows

General Page County Stats Massanutten Mtns Elevation: Max: 4032 ft Min: 560.6 ft Slope: Maximum: 85.6 Mean: 12.6 SD: 9.4 Size of County: 314 mi 2 Population: 24,042 * No known or recorded modern landslides before completion of the project *

Bedrock Geology (Southworth et al, 2009) Valley and Ridge General Page County Stats Elevation: Max: 4032 ft Min: 560.6 ft Slope: Maximum: 85.6 Mean: 12.6 SD: 9.4 Size of County: 314 mi 2 Blue Ridge Population: 24,042 * No known or recorded modern landslides before completion of the project *

500 Landslides Precip: 15 in/24 hrs 584 Landslides Precip: 30 in/14 hrs 1949 1995 1969 3724 Landslides Precip: 27 in/8 hrs

1. Slope Movement/Slope Movement Deposits Map and Inventory 2. Landslide Susceptibility Modeling and Map(s) Show areas susceptible to rapid LS initiation during heavy rainfall Will focus on critical facilities and infrastructure Help guide informed development and emergency management decisions *Completion Date of August 31, 2013*

File Geodatabase: Processes (Landslide Points) Deposits (Ancient landslide polygons) Landslide Tracks Air Photo Points Field Notes Related Tables Rock/Soil/Geologic Data

Total # LS in Database as of 7/18/2013: 4817 LS Type: Debris Flow/Slide Mean Slope at Headscarp: 27

Type: Weathered Rx Slides; Debris Flows; Debris Slides Slope: Min 15 Max 80 *Mean - 32 All on natural slopes 7 of 9 occurred in Blue Ridge 6 initiated at the base of geologic contacts 1 2

Phase I: Field Work Preparation Aerial Photography Interpretation DTM LS Deposit Interpretation Phase II: Field Reconnaissance Adjust Interpreted Data Phase III: Slope Stability Modeling SINMAP Where landslides may start Phase IV: Hydrologic Flow Routing Debris Flow Pathways Where landslides may go Phase V: Finalize GIS Map Deliverables

Aerial Photography Interpretation 60 Potential landslides identified for further field investigation 42 visited; 4 were landslides Interpretation done at 1:6,000 Air Photo Vintages: 1958, 1963-1964, 1972, 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011 Air Photo Point 1998 Infrared DOQQ

Air Photo Point Air Photo Point Process Points 1998 Infrared DOQQ 2011 Infrared DOQQ

Air Photo Point 2006 DOQQ Massanutten: Martinsburg shale (Om) Devonian/Silurian shale, mudstone, siltstone (DSu) Blue Ridge : Harpers Fm phyllite (Cch) Looking downhill from interpreted headscarp in the Martinsburg shale (Om)

Landslide Deposit Interpretation Identified using DTM data (10 ft resolution), 5 ft contours and aerial photography Interpretation done at 1:6,000 400+ Polygons in Database Mostly ancient debris fan deposits accumulations of coarse boulder-to-sand sized colluvial particles

Identified using ONLY aerial photography Must be able to see patches of bare rock at 1:6,000 Primarily a maintenance/construction hazard 2011 Infrared DOQQ

Identified using a combination of aerial photography and DTM Some are highly dissected by modern stream channels Moderate hazard if remobilized

Identified ONLY using DTM and contours Accumulations of subangular -tosubrounded boulder-tocobble size fragments in a finer-grained matrix Upper reaches may include boulder streams/talus Considered moderate hazard DTM with slope overlay; Index Contour = 100ft

Massanutten Thin veneer (~1 ft) of rounded quartzite cobbles-to-boulders Red/brown soils with ghost clasts Higher clay % than younger deposits

Massanutten Rounded quartzite cobblesto-boulders (where visible) Flatter topography Sometimes perched on higher hilltops

Blue Ridge Rounded cobbles-to boulders of various lithologies in a chaotic matrix Little surface expression Soil rubification

Field Reconnaissance Basic Field Work Stats Hike Miles Traversed: 154 mi Road Miles Traversed: 110 mi # Field Notes collected DGMR: 1408 # Field Notes collected JMU: 292

SINMAP (Stability Index MAPping)1 GIS model that shows where debris flows may start Based on modified infinite slope stability equation > 5 inches of rainfall in 24 hours only for unmodified or natural slopes (1Pack et al., 1998)

Upper and Lower Bounding Parameter Values: Soil Friction Angle (φ) Soil Cohesion (C s ) Root Cohesion (C r ) Soil Hydraulic Conductivity (K sat ) Parameters Derived from: Soil Testing (9 field sites) USDA-NRCS Soil Mapping County Water Well Logs Level I Stability Analysis (LISA) Manual; Hammond et al., 1992

Stability Index Map Zones and Rankings

County-wide Relative Hazard High: 11.2% Unstable Upper Threshold Moderate: 13.9% Low: 78.8% Lower Threshold Nominally Stable Moderately Stable Stable All landslides fall into medium or high relative hazard areas

Debris Flow Pathways Hydrologic flow paths generated from high hazard SINMAP zones using the DEM Flow paths buffered to 65 ft (20 m) wide Flow paths terminated: Methodology At slopes of 3 degrees in areas > 0.25 acres When they encounter the 500-year floodplain When they encounter mapped impoundments >0.25 acres At bases of cut slopes SINMAP Debris Flow Pathways Mapped debris flow pathways Potential debris flow pathways Past debris flow activity (deposits) No known past or potential debris flow activity

Mapped debris flow pathways increasing Potential debris flow pathways (from SINMAP) Past debris flow activity (deposits) No known past or potential debris flow activity Relative Hazard decreasing Debris Flow Pathways Map

Complete LS Hazard Modeling Final Delivery to Page County Summer 2013 Field Review Fall 2013 Debris Flow Volumetric Analysis JMU Research Debris Flow Pathways

Grant Support: FEMA VDEM From JMU: Dr. Scott Eaton Billy Cheung Steve Stone From UNCW: Dr. Michael Smith Anne Carter Witt VA Division of Geology and Mineral Resources anne.witt@dmme.virginia.gov

DTM with slope overlay

Field Reconnaissance Basic Field Work Stats Hike Miles Traversed: 154 mi Road Miles Traversed: 110 mi # Field Notes collected DGMR: 1408 # Field Notes collected JMU: 292