GP-B Attitude and Translation Control. John Mester Stanford University

Similar documents
Precision Attitude and Translation Control Design and Optimization

LISA Pathfinder Coldgas Thrusters

Gravity Probe B Data Analysis Challenges, Insights, and Results

Control of the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

Generation X. Attitude Control Systems (ACS) Aprille Ericsson Dave Olney Josephine San. July 27, 2000

Design of Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem

Spacecraft Bus / Platform

Attitude Determination and Control System Design for STU-2A Cubesat and In-Orbit Results

From an experimental idea to a satellite

Attitude Determination and. Attitude Control

Lunar Satellite Attitude Determination System

Technology Readiness Level:

Spinning Satellites Examples. ACS: Gravity Gradient. ACS: Single Spin

The Stanford Gravitational Reference Sensor

FIBER OPTIC GYRO-BASED ATTITUDE DETERMINATION FOR HIGH- PERFORMANCE TARGET TRACKING

Gravity Probe B Overview

Attitude Determination and Control

On-Orbit Performance of KOMPSAT-2 AOCS Korea Aerospace Research Institute Seung-Wu Rhee, Ph. D.

The Swarm Vector Field Magnetometer (VFM): instrument commissioning & performance assessment José M. G. Merayo

Sensors: a) Gyroscope. Micro Electro-Mechanical (MEM) Gyroscopes: (MEM) Gyroscopes. Needs:

A Concept of Nanosatellite Small Fleet for Earth Observation

Satellite Attitude Control System Design Using Reaction Wheels Bhanu Gouda Brian Fast Dan Simon

The Design and On-orbit Performance of the Relativity Mission Gyroscopes

3D Pendulum Experimental Setup for Earth-based Testing of the Attitude Dynamics of an Orbiting Spacecraft

Presentation by Indian Delegation. to 49 th STSC UNCOPUOS. February 2012 Vienna

Preliminary Development of an Experimental Lightweight Pulsed Plasma Thruster for Solar Sail Attitude Control

Integrated Test Facility for Nanosat Assessment and Verification

5.12 The Aerodynamic Assist Trajectories of Vehicles Propelled by Solar Radiation Pressure References...

Lecture Module 5: Introduction to Attitude Stabilization and Control

Direct MOND/TEVES test with LISA Pathfinder

Drag-free Control and Drag Force Recovery of Small Satellites

The Gravity Probe B electrostatic gyroscope suspension system (GSS)

CS491/691: Introduction to Aerial Robotics

Design of Sliding Mode Attitude Control for Communication Spacecraft

ESSE Payload Design. 1.2 Introduction to Space Missions

Spacecraft Bus / Platform

PRATHAM IIT BOMBAY STUDENT SATELLITE. Critical Design Report Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS) for Pratham

A Stellar Gyroscope for CubeSat Attitude Determination

Design Architecture of Attitude Determination and Control System of ICUBE

Combined Sensor Platform for Boost Guidance and Attitude Control of Sounding Rocket Payload

Gravity Probe B: Interim Report & First Results. APS Meeting Jacksonville, FL. Francis Everitt. 14 April Page 1

MAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009

ONBOARD AUTONOMOUS CORRECTIONS FOR ACCURATE IRF POINTING

1

Quaternion-Based Tracking Control Law Design For Tracking Mode

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

The Attitude and Orbit Control of XMM

Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem (ADCS) Review

Spacecraft Motions. Carl Grillmair. Time Series Data Reduction with IRAC 1 June 2014 CJG - 1

PRELIMINAJ3.:( 6/8/92 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION FOR THE DSPSE GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL CSCI. Prepared by

VN-100 Velocity Compensation

Shally Saraf, Stanford University

Inertial Frame frame-dragging

GP-B Telescope. John Mester. Stanford University

NEW HORIZONS PLUTO APPROACH NAVIGATION

GG studies at TAS-I: state of the art

Design and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite operations

Attitude Determination using Infrared Earth Horizon Sensors

BOWSER Balloon Observatory for Wavelength and Spectral Emission Readings

Structure and algorithms of motion control system's software of the small spacecraft

Dead Reckoning navigation (DR navigation)

Russell B. Schweickart and Gary Mills

Six-Axis Monopropellant Propulsion System for Pico-Satellites

Attitude Control on the Pico Satellite Solar Cell Testbed-2

Satellite Components & Systems. Dr. Ugur GUVEN Aerospace Engineer (P.hD) Nuclear Science & Technology Engineer (M.Sc)

The Integrated Structural Electrodynamic Propulsion (ISEP) Experiment

SPACE SHUTTLE ROLL MANEUVER

Attitude Control Strategy for HAUSAT-2 with Pitch Bias Momentum System

EE565:Mobile Robotics Lecture 6

OTSUKIMI Moon-sighting Satellite Kyushu Institute of Technology. 3 rd Mission Idea Contest UNISEC Global

PROBA 1. F. Teston ESA/ESTEC D/TEC-EL

James Paul Mason CU Boulder LASP

INTERNAL THALES ALENIA SPACE

Attitude Control Simulator for the Small Satellite and Its Validation by On-orbit Data of QSAT-EOS

Control of the Keck and CELT Telescopes. Douglas G. MacMartin Control & Dynamical Systems California Institute of Technology

CHAPTER 5 FUZZY LOGIC FOR ATTITUDE CONTROL

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS

ON-ORBIT PERFORMANCE OF THE GRAVITY PROBE B DRAG-FREE TRANSLATION CONTROL SYSTEM

ADCSS 2017: Sodern presentation

GREX Gravity probe B Mission present status. Nice octobre Pierre Touboul with support from Rodney Torïi (Stanford University)

Stanford, Space Gravity Research Group

ATTITUDE CONTROL FOR GRACE THE FIRST LOW-FLYING SATELLITE FORMATION

The Orbit Control of ERS-1 and ERS-2 for a Very Accurate Tandem Configuration

NEW EUMETSAT POLAR SYSTEM ATTITUDE MONITORING SOFTWARE

INVESTIGATION OF PULSED PLASMA THRUSTERS FOR SPACECRAFT ATTITUDE CONTROL

Exploring the Mysteries of the Cosmos on the MOST Microsatellite Mission

Attitude control system for ROCSAT-3 microsatellite: a conceptual design

2 Each satellite will have two test masses, each being the end mirror for an interferometer.

LISA Pathfinder measuring pico-meters and femto-newtons in space

Formation Flying and Rendezvous and Docking Simulator for Exploration Missions (FAMOS-V2)

Study Participants: T.E. Sarris, E.R. Talaat, A. Papayannis, P. Dietrich, M. Daly, X. Chu, J. Penson, A. Vouldis, V. Antakis, G.

Orbital Environment Simulator

An Attitude Control System and Commissioning Results of the SNAP-1 Nanosatellite

The Engineering of LISA Pathfinder the quietest Laboratory ever flown in Space

Ulrich Walter. Astronautics. The Physics of Space Flight. 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition

LOCAL VERTICAL/LOCAL HORIZONTAL ATTITUDE CONTROL FOR SPARTAN SPACECRAFT. James R. Morrissey C. T. A. Incorporated Beltsville, Maryland, USA 20705

Technical Note. Secondary AOCS Design. Laszlo Szerdahelyi, Astrium GmbH. Walter Fichter, Astrium GmbH. Alexander Schleicher, ZARM Date:

THE MICRO ADVANCED STELLAR COMPASS FOR ESA S PROBA 2 MISSION

The Quantum Sensor Challenge Designing a System for a Space Mission. Astrid Heske European Space Agency The Netherlands

Transcription:

GP-B Attitude and Translation Control John Mester Stanford University 1

The GP-B Challenge Gyroscope (G) 10 7 times better than best 'modeled' inertial navigation gyros Telescope (T) 10 3 times better than best prior star trackers G T <1 marc-s subtraction within pointing range Space Gyro Basis for 10 7 advance in gyro performance - reduced support force, "drag-free" - roll about line of sight to star - sphericity and mass unbalance requirements: 10nm achieved 2

ATC Requirements Pointing Requirement 110marcsec/ Hz (Guide Star Valid) pitch and yaw Roll Requirement 40 arcsec at roll rate Acceleration Requirement <10 11 g crass track average => Active Control of all 6 dof of Spacecraft 3

What is the ATC system? First space vehicle to actively control all six degrees of freedom 3 Orientation 3 Translation 16* Cold gas proportional micro thrusters provide forces and torques Fueled by helium boil-off gas from cryogenic system * Two thrusters failed before science phase Common-mode flow rate control maintains helium bath temperature Pointing system controls the guide star tracking telescope and maintains roll phase Translation control system uses acceleration measurements from one of the science gyroscope's suspension system to null out environmental forces Vehicle flies in a near-perfect gravitational orbit 4

Block Diagram Command Generator Attitude and Translation Control Software + - Attitude Control Translation Control Dewar Temp Control + - Magnetic Torquer Distribution Thruster Distribution Orientation Sensors Primary Telescope Star Trackers Backup Magnetometers Coarse Sun Sensors Sensors Rate Sensor Control Gyroscopes Dewar Press & Temp Sensors Science Gyro Suspension System Magnetic Torque Rods Actuators Thrusters Vehicle Dyanmics + + GP-B Spacecraft Dewar Thermodynamics 5

ATC System Hardware Sensors Actuators Primary Sensors Attitude Telescope Star Tracker Rate Gyroscopes Translation - One of the four science gyro suspension systems Primary Attitude and Translation Control Actuators - 16* Proportional Micro Thrusters Backup Attitude Sensors Magnetometers Coarse Sun Sensors Backup Translation Sensors - Three more science gyroscopes Backup Attitude Actuators - Magnetic torque rods 6

The Overall Space Vehicle 16 Helium gas thrusters, 0-10 mn ea, for fine 6 DOF control. Roll star sensors for fine pointing. Magnetometers for coarse attitude determination. Tertiary sun sensors for very coarse attitude determination. Magnetic torque rods for coarse orientation control. Mass trim to tune moments of inertia. Dual transponders for TDRSS and ground station communications. Stanford-modified GPS receiver for precise positioning. Laser ranging corner cube cross-checks GPS. Redundant spacecraft processors, transponders. 7

Control Gyroscopes Control Gyroscopes Two gyro assemblies - one used, one backup Gyro mounting platform thermal distortion had a big impact on the control system performance 8

Star Trackers Star Trackers Two star trackers - one primary, one backup 8 deg field of view Mounted at angles 10 degrees apart - different groups of stars visible 9

Magnetometers Magnetometers Measure vehicle orientation by comparing magnetic field reading with expected field Expected field depends on orbital position which is propagated onboard and updated from ground 10

Coarse Sun Sensors Fwd Sun Sensors Backup coarse orientation sensors Rough estimate of vehicle orientation Only used if star trackers and magnetometers fail Aft Sun Sensor 11

Thrusters Vehicle has a nominal mass flow rate of ~8 mg/s Maximum thruster force: 8mN Thrusters 12

Magnetic Torque Rods 3 Orthogonal torque rods Two axis control depending on magnetic field geometry Orbit position propagated onboard and updated with ground processed GPS data Thruster failure backup Used during science to increase fuel margin Still used today to control satellite to ~5 deg 13

Attitude Control Science Mode Pitch/Yaw Pointing Telescope Control gyroscopes Roll Control Star tracker Control gyroscopes Coarse Control Pitch/Yaw Pointing Star tracker Control gyroscopes (Magnetometers) (Coarse sun sensors) Roll Control Star Tracker Control Gyroscopes (Magnetometers) (Coarse sun sensors) 14

Single Axis Pointing Error The attitude control goes through three different phases each orbit: 1) Guide Star Invalid Guide star is blocked by Earth 2) Guide Star Capture Guide star is re-centered in the telescope field of view 3) Guide Star Valid Nominal telescope pointing Pointing Angle (marcsec) 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 5,000 10,000 North-South Pointing vs Time (11/10/04) Vehicle in Solar Eclipse 2) Guide Star Capture 1) Guide Star Invalid 3) Guide Star Valid -15,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time Since Guide Star Invalid Start (min) 15

Target Plot Nominal guide star capture times range from 30 to 90 seconds The RMS vehicle pointing is controlled to less than 320 marcsec (1.55 microrad) Spacecraft Pointing (3/25/05) 3000 North-South Pointing (marcsec) 2000 1000 0-1000 -2000-3000 RMS Pointing = 260 marcsec 3600 marcsec -4000-2000 0 2000 4000 East-West Pointing (marc-sec) 16

Proton Monitor Data Proton Monitor Hits 17

Telescope Detector Data Particle hits also affected the telescope detectors A plot of the number of hits in the telescope clearly shows the South Atlantic Anomaly region Telescope Detector Proton Hits 18

SAA Data Plot GP-B flies through the SAA at least three out of every fifteen orbits losing, at times, up to 80% of the telescope data to proton corruption Angle (marc-sec) 1000 500 0-500 -1000 Vehicle X-Axis Attitude Error (5/9/05) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time Since Guide Star Valid Start (min) Percentage of Telescope Data Corrupted by Proton Activity 100 Percent 80 60 40 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time Since Guide Star Valid Start (min) 19

Roll Rate Plot 400 Vehicle X-Axis Pointing Total RMS Pointing Roll Rate Component Mission-long pointing performance 350 300 Shaded Regions - Roll Rate Notch Filter Turned ON Amplitude (marcsec) 250 200 150 100 50 0 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 Orbit Number 20

Pitch/Yaw Attitude Dither Dither: Slow 30 marc-s calibration oscillations injected into pointing system { Vehicle pitch/yaw dither gyro output telescope output Scale factors matched for accurate subtraction Once telescope/gyroscope scale factor is known, vehicle motion can be subtracted out of the gyroscope signal 21

Roll Phase Control There are two star trackers onboard the GP-B satellite. Field-of-view: 8 o x8 o Boresight axes are 50 o and 60 o away from the satellite roll axis, out of phase by 180 o Two Attitude Reference Platforms (ARPs) are mounted on the graphite ring around the dewar of the satellite. One control gyroscope package and one star tracker are mounted on each ARP Close-loop control of the roll phase is implemented with 16 proportional cold gas thrusters by the Attitude and Translation Control (ATC) system. 22

Star Tracked Fields of View Red = Star Tracker B Field of View Blue = Star Tracker A Field of View 23

Roll Angle Plot Angle (arc-sec) 80 60 40 20 0 Roll Phase Error (3/25/05) 40 arcsec The control gyroscopes and star trackers are used to control the spacecraft roll angle to an error less than 40 arcsec at a constant roll period of 77.5 sec -20-40 -60-80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time Since Guide Star Valid Start (min) 24

Drag-free Satellite Technology Transit deployed on orbit 1959 George Pugh envisioned a tender satellite for first proposed test of General Relativity. 1964 Ben Lange (Stanford) provided first detailed study of issues surrounding drag-free satellites. 1972 Flight of a Disturbance Compensation System (DISCOS) on Transit I (experimental US Navy navigation satellite) 2004 Flight of Gravity Probe B Transit pre-launch 25

Drag Free Concept Control Spacecraft to follow an inertial sensor Reduce disturbances in measurement band Aerodynamic drag Magnetic torques Gravity Gradient torques Radiation Pressure Spacecraft Follows a purely Gravitational Orbit 26

Drag Free History Drag-Free Satellites have flown successfully TRIAD I : Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory Navy Transit Navigation System Launched September 2, 1972 Polar Orbit at 750 km Mission Lifetime over one year DISCOS - Disturbance Compensation System - Stanford 3 axis translation control And Now Also GP-B 3 axis translation control 3 axis attitude control 27

DISCOS Performance Electrostatic Sensing of Proof Mass Pressurized gas On-Off Thrusters 3 Axis Translation Control Acceleration levels were below 5 x 10 12 g averaged over 3 days limited by tracking data and earth gravity model 28

Propellant Source: Helium Boil-off 300K ambient Superfluid Helium 2400L Heat Leak 125mW Porous Plug Superfluid phase separator Wick 1.8 K Pyro vent valve Isolation Valves (TIV) - 16 Thrusters - 16 Superfluid phase separator porous plug permits gaseous Helium to leave main tank while keeping superfluid He inside. Mass Flow: 4-16 mg s 1 over plug temperatures of 1.6K to 2.0K without choke or breakthrough. Provides supply pressure of 660 to 2300 Pa (5 to 17.5 torr) to thrusters. 2.8K Each thruster is provided a dedicated isolation valve (TIV) to disable unit if a failure occurs. 29

Flight Proportional Thruster Design Thrust: 0 10 mn I SP : 130 sec Mdot: 6-7 mg s 1 Scale factor variation: 6% Bias variation: Noise: 25 µn Hz 1/2 0.2 mn 3.5mm dia Operates under choked flow conditions Pressure FB loop makes thrust independent of unit temperature Redundant voice coils From Dewar and manifold Supply: 5 to 17.5 torr Re ~10 Laminar flow! 30

Thruster Arrangement on Vehicle Guide Star 14 8 16 12 1 1.19 m 1.19 m 2 SV Forward 7 Thruster Cluster Roll Axis 2.51 m 1.9 m 11 +Z +Y Space Vehicle Body Axes +X G1 SV Aft 23cm 10 6 8.8cm G4 3 1.19 m 1.19 m 4 9 13 5 15 Thrusters are arranged in 4 clusters of 4 units each. Each cluster has thrust authority along 3 axis. Arrangement chosen to be robust to thruster failures. Provides 3DOF of attitude and 3DOF of translation control for the space vehicle. 31

Prime Drag-free Operation In prime drag-free, the ATC system flies the SV around the position of the proof mass Suspension control is turned off (up to a given safety radius) Advantage: Suspension forces/torques minimized (somewhat) Disadvantages: 1) unsuspended spinning bomb, 2) cannot correct for accelerometer biases Translation Control Gravity Gradient feed forward Ext Distur - bances Resonance Modes + SV Translation PID Controller SV Ctrl Effort + + U 1 Ms 2 + R r Vehicle dynamics K2 K1 - Position Bridge 1 ms GSS Ctrl Gyro Suspension Effort Controller 2 + ( r! R) SV Position Gyro Position + R - + r ( r! R) Gyro Suspension Ext Disturbances Gyroscope dynamics Space Vehicle Dynamics 32

Backup Drag-free Operation In suspended (backup) drag-free, the ATC system nulls the gyro suspension control effort. Advantage: Gyro always suspended; 2) Accelerometer biases can be removed. Disadvantage: Suspension forces and torques reduced to preload minimums. Accelerometer bias compensation Translation Control + Gravity Gradient feed forward SV Translation PID Controller SV Ctrl Effort + + U Ext Distur - bances Resonance Modes 1 Ms 2 Vehicle dynamics + R r K2 K 1 - Gyro Suspension Controller GSS Ctrl Effort u Position Bridge + ( r! R) 1 ms 2 SV Position Gyro Position + R - + r ( r! R) Gyro Suspension Ext Disturbances Gyroscope dynamics Space Vehicle Dynamics 33

Example Drag-free Transitions Transition sequence: Position (nm) 10 0-10 Science Gyro Position Drag free on Vehicle X Vehicle Y Vehicle Z 1. Backup drag-free 2. Prime drag-free 3. Non drag-free. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Force (nn) 100 50 0-50 -100 Science Gyro Control Effort 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Vehicle X 1. Prime drag-free mode Vehicle Y Vehicle Z not used on orbit due to unacceptable accelerometer biases. (20 nn on proof mass) Force (mn) 5 0-5 Vehicle X Vehicle Y Vehicle Z Drag free off Space Vehicle Thrust 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Minutes Since 08/22/2005 18:05 Note: data shown is early on-orbit test sequence; does not represent final performance. 34

Overall Drag-free Performance c e s. m, t r o -2 f f e l o r t n o C Gyro 1 - Space Vehicle and Gyro Ctrl Effort - Inertial space (2005/200, 14 days) 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 10-11 Gravity Gradient Residual gyro acceleration Z Gyro CE Z SV CE 2!Orbit 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 10 0 Frequency (Hz) Performance at 4x10-12 g level between 0.01 mhz and 10 mhz in inertial space. Suppression of gravity gradient acceleration by a factor of ~10,000. Meets needs of experiment to minimize support forces on gyroscope. 35

Dewar Dewar 36

Dewar control plots The ATC system maintains a constant dewar temperature of ~1.83 K by controlling the flow rate of helium boil-off from the dewar 37

Dewar Heat Pulse The temperature control behavior is observable during a heat pulse test (used to estimate the amount of helium remaining in the dewar) 38

Lesson: Accelerometer biases Bends Orbit Effective SV Z-axis thrust (mn) Accelerometer bias due to small patch charges generate drag-free force bias on vehicle. Bias identified via GPS and laser ranging; removed via parameter update. Necessitated backup drag-free operation to compensate for biases; no ability to compensate in prime drag-free. 39

Lesson: Dewar slosh mode coupling Dewar slosh mode resonance peak pumped by drag-free controller Managed via drag-free loop gain setting and crossover phase margin. Simple fluid wave model predicts period with high accuracy: Wave Velocity v = ad r d a =! 2 roll r T slosh = l 2 r v =! ad = T r roll d Periods: 100 to 200 sec (without the addition of SV roll period, 77.5 sec) 40

Slosh Mode Evolution Peak at 1.2x10-7 g 217 sec period 41

Conclusions 100marcsec/ Hz pointing Achieved 5marcsec at roll frequency Roll phase controlled to <40arcsec Drag-free performance on orbit established at the 4x10-12 g level. Reduced the gravity gradient accelerations on the proof mass by a factor of ~10,000. Proportional cold gas thrusters fueled from Helium boil-off worked well to control the space vehicle in 6DOF. Both prime and backup drag-free modes were demonstrated on orbit. Accelerometer biases were corrected in backup drag-free mode to keep the orbit constant. 6 Degree of Freedom Control Works 42