Quantum dynamics in Josephson junction circuits Wiebke Guichard Université Joseph Fourier/ Néel Institute Nano Department Equipe Cohérence quantique

Similar documents
Strong tunable coupling between a charge and a phase qubit

nano Josephson junctions Quantum dynamics in

Quantum dynamics in nano Josephson junctions

Phase-charge duality in Josephson junction circuits: effect of microwave irradiation*

Topologicaly protected abelian Josephson qubits: theory and experiment.

M.C. Escher. Angels and devils (detail), 1941

Parity-Protected Josephson Qubits

Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics of Superconducting Electrical Circuits

Lecture 9 Superconducting qubits Ref: Clarke and Wilhelm, Nature 453, 1031 (2008).

Superconducting quantum bits. Péter Makk

Superconducting Qubits

Superconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172)

Quantum phase slip junctions

Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Exploring parasitic Material Defects with superconducting Qubits

Superconducting Qubits. Nathan Kurz PHYS January 2007

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 2 Feb 2011

Doing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Coherent oscillations in a charge qubit

From Majorana Fermions to Topological Order

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 15 Mar 2016

Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator

Theory for investigating the dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits

INTRIQ. Coherent Manipulation of single nuclear spin

Dissipation in Transmon

Supercondcting Qubits

Fabio Chiarello IFN-CNR Rome, Italy

Metastable states in an RF driven Josephson oscillator

Introduction to Circuit QED

Final Report. Superconducting Qubits for Quantum Computation Contract MDA C-A821/0000

Josephson charge qubits: a brief review

Quantum Spectrometers of Electrical Noise

Theoretical design of a readout system for the Flux Qubit-Resonator Rabi Model in the ultrastrong coupling regime

Manipulation of Majorana fermions via single charge control

6.4 Physics of superconducting quantum circuits

Superposition of two mesoscopically distinct quantum states: Coupling a Cooper-pair box to a large superconducting island

Lecture 10 Superconducting qubits: advanced designs, operation 1 Generic decoherence problem: Λ 0 : intended

2015 AMO Summer School. Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits I. Io-Chun, Hoi

Quantum Optics and Quantum Informatics FKA173

SMR/ JOINT ICTP-INFM SCHOOL/WORKSHOP ON "ENTANGLEMENT AT THE NANOSCALE" (28 October - 8 November 2002)

A Superconducting Quantum Simulator for Topological Order and the Toric Code. Michael J. Hartmann Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh qlightcrete 2016

Quantum Phase Slip Junctions

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.supr-con] 29 Sep 2016

Quantum simulation with superconducting circuits

Superconducting Qubits Coupling Superconducting Qubits Via a Cavity Bus

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 20 Nov 2017

Chapter 3. Physics of Josephson Junctions: The Voltage State

Quantum computation with superconducting qubits

INTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD

Circuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing

Semiconductors: Applications in spintronics and quantum computation. Tatiana G. Rappoport Advanced Summer School Cinvestav 2005

Qubits: Supraleitende Quantenschaltungen. (i) Grundlagen und Messung

chiral m = n Armchair m = 0 or n = 0 Zigzag m n Chiral Three major categories of nanotube structures can be identified based on the values of m and n

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Physical mechanisms of low frequency noises in superconducting qubits

Electrical quantum engineering with superconducting circuits

Decoherence in Josephson and Spin Qubits. Lecture 3: 1/f noise, two-level systems

Three-terminal quantum-dot thermoelectrics

Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition

single-electron electron tunneling (SET)

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014

Circuit quantum electrodynamics with transmon qubits

Josephson qubits. P. Bertet. SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group

Nano devices for single photon source and qubit

Of course, what is amazing about Kitaev's scheme is the claim that Z and controlled Z gates can be protected!

Quantum bits with Josephson junctions

Experimental Quantum Computing: A technology overview

Electrically Protected Valley-Orbit Qubit in Silicon

Lecture 6. Josephson junction circuits. Simple current-biased junction Assume for the moment that the only source of current is the bulk leads, and

Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits. Io-Chun Hoi 許耀銓

Solid-State Spin Quantum Computers

The Physics of Nanoelectronics

Superconducting Resonators and Their Applications in Quantum Engineering

Protected qubit based on a superconducting current mirror

Exploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities. Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris

REALIZING QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS WITH SUPERCONDUCTING NANOCIRCUITS

The Nanotube SQUID. uhu,, M. Monthioux,, V. Bouchiat, W. Wernsdorfer, CEMES-Toulouse, CRTBT & LLN Grenoble

Dispersive Readout, Rabi- and Ramsey-Measurements for Superconducting Qubits

Introduction to Superconductivity. Superconductivity was discovered in 1911 by Kamerlingh Onnes. Zero electrical resistance

Matter wave interferometry beyond classical limits

Rabi oscillations, Ramsey fringes and spin echoes in an electrical circuit

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Superconducting persistent-current qubit Orlando, T.P.; Mooij, J.E.; Tian, Lin; Wal, Caspar H. van der; Levitov, L.S.; Lloyd, Seth; Mazo, J.J.

Electron spin qubits in P donors in Silicon

Fig. 8.1 : Schematic for single electron tunneling arrangement. For large system this charge is usually washed out by the thermal noise

QUANTUM COMPUTING. Part II. Jean V. Bellissard. Georgia Institute of Technology & Institut Universitaire de France

State tomography of capacitively shunted phase qubits with high fidelity. Abstract

Superconducting Flux Qubits: The state of the field

Theoretical analysis of phase qubits

Josephson-Junction Qubits

Current noise in topological Josephson junctions

From single magnetic adatoms to coupled chains on a superconductor

Nonequilibrium generalization of Andreev bound states. Régis Mélin

Quantum Reservoir Engineering

Electron counting with quantum dots

Quantum physics in quantum dots

Superconducting phase qubits

Chapter 5 Nanomanipulation. Chapter 5 Nanomanipulation. 5.1: With a nanotube. Cutting a nanotube. Moving a nanotube

Transcription:

Quantum dynamics in Josephson junction circuits Wiebke Guichard Université Joseph Fourier/ Néel Institute Nano Department Equipe Cohérence quantique Josephson junction team Olivier Buisson, Bernard Pannetier, Laurent Lévy Current PhD students: Ioan Pop (Josephson junction arrays, Topologically protected qubit) Florent Lecocq (Qubit de phase) Zhihui Peng (Epitaxial Josephson junction) Former PhD students and postdocs: Aurélien Fay (Coupled qubit circuit) Emile Hoskinson Julien Claudon Franck Balestro Collaborations : Frank Hekking, Lev Ioffe, Bénoit Doucot, Léonid Glazman, Ivan Protopopov, Michael Gershenson Journée Information quantique, Monday 15 June 2009

Outline Quantum dynamics in a coupled qubit circuit Josephson junction arrays: Towards the realization of a topologically protected qubit?

Ultrasmall Josephson junction E J = R R Q T 2 - - + + j - + 2 j 1 - R T C + 1 S = Surface R T ~ S C ~ S 2 e E C = 2C Josephson effect: ˆ 2 Q 2C Charging effects 2e I( ϕ) = EJ sin( ϕ) Coulomb blockade: h Hˆ = E J cos ϕˆ I=0 for V<e/C ϕ N 1/ 2

E J >>E C Bloch Bands 2 d ψ E E J + cos = 2 + ϕ ψ dϕ Ec EC 0 Tight Binding Model H = E 2 d 2 dϕ c E J cosϕ Movement of a particle in a periodic potential E Pot E J cos(ϕ) E n (q) 2> 1> 0> ϕ q/2e 2π 2π Phase-slip! ( ) ( ) 3 1/ 4 Tunnelling amplitude for phase slip: v E E exp 8E / E J C J C

E C >>E J Weak Binding Model E(q) E Pot E J cos(ϕ) E J ϕ E C 0> 1> q

The coupled circuit Asymmetric Cooper pair transistor 10µm 500nm V G δ(ι b,φ b ) Φ b I b SQUID H ˆ T = (2e)2 ( n ) n g ) 2 Σe 2C j cos(δ /2)cos( Θ ) d ) Σ 0.5 µm e j sin(δ /2)sin( Θ ) d ) H ˆ S = 2 1 hω ( ˆ p P 2 + X ˆ 2 ) σhω ˆ P X 3 Phase qubit E J >> E C Charge qubit E J ~ E C hω S (I b,φ b ) U (I b,φ b )

Asymmetric Cooper pair transistor: charge qubit δ Charging energy Josephson energy symmetric asymmetric V G Microwave A charge qubit: with [ n ˆ, Θ ˆ d ]= i n g =1/2 Josephson energy Charge energy

Manipulation of the qubit at the optimal point δ=π ν MW =ν ->-> +> Measurement on the SQUID T 2 =15ns T MW : tunable T delay Rabi oscillations : Energy relaxation T decay,rabi =110ns

Spectroscopy measurement of the two quantum systems n g =1/2 I b =1910nA ACPT SQUID

Spectroscopy versus V g Resonant coupling Dispersive coupling 0,+> 1,-> g~110mhz δν T ~40MHz (charge noise limitation) δν S ~20MHz (fluctuator and flux noise limitation) 0,+> -> +> 200ΜΗz χ g 2 /4 10MHz

Spectroscopy versus flux Spectroscopy at I bias = 1890 2140 107 na na I 50% (µa) Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) ν r ~ 16.6 GHz g ~ 250 MHz ν r ~ 10.4 GHz g ~ 900 MHz ν r ~ 18.1 GHz g ~ 160 MHz Two qubits can be in resonance from 9 GHz to 20 GHz. Strong variation of the coupling strength.

Resonant coupling Coupling varies from 60 MHz to 1100 MHz g (GHz) factor of 18 ν r (GHz)

Electrical schematic of the circuit

Coupling in resonance Ĥ COUPL = Capacitive coupling Josephson coupling Capacitance asymmetry Josephson energy asymmetry

Resonant coupling A. Fay et al., PRL 100, 187003 (2008) We consider λ = µ = 41.6% g (GHz) ν r (GHz) If transistor was symmetric (λ=µ=0) coupling would be zero

Resonant coupling A. Fay et al., PRL 100, 187003 (2008) We consider λ = 37.7% and µ = 41.6% g (GHz) ν r (GHz)

Two qubits read-out Aurelien Fay Thesis U (I b,φ b ) Γ 1 Flux pulse SQUID ω p (I b,φ b ) A nano-second flux pulse reduces the barrier Escape Quantronium read-out : classical Josephson junction ω S <<ω T In our case: ω S ω T!!!

Presence of an anti-level crossing ν (GHz) 18 16 14 12 10 With anti-level crossing SQUID alone 8 Very weak Landau-Zener transition Adiabatic quantum transfer!

Absence of an anti-level crossing ν (GHz) 18 16 14 12 10 8 Without anti-level crossing Squid alone Very weak Landau-Zener transition

Quantum dynamics in Josephson junction arrays Candidate for the realisation of a topologically protected qubit Dual of Shapiro steps in a Josephson junction array δ Φ c Phase bias and frustration: Φ R f = 2πΦ Φ δ = Φ c 0 0, f=0 f=0.5 eff J E, E eff c Chain of Josephson junctions with effective E J and E C Chain of N spins 2 N possible states

Phase biased Josephson junction array ϕ 1 ϕ 2 δ ϕ N E Pot =-E J cos(ϕ) Tunneling-amplitude = Bloch band width Quantum Tunneling ( ) 1/ 4 E E exp( 8E E ) 3 v / J C J C ψ(ϕ) ψ(ϕ+2π) ϕ

Chain of single Josephson junctions: classical regime E J >>E C δ = ϕ 1 ϕ 2 i= 1 ϕ N N ϕ i ϕ = i δ N NE J E(δ) E pot = = i NE E J J EJ 2 = δ 2N [1 cos( ϕ )] [1 cos( δ / N)] i 2πN δ

Phase biased chain: Effect of phase slip in phase biased chain δ = N i= 1 δ i ϕ i where ϕ = i δ N ϕ i Phase slip: energy unchanged but contraint violated! Phase slip combined with small adjustments: constraint satisfied! δ i ϕ ϕ + 2π i i j i δ δ + 2π n δ i δ 2π ϕ j = + 2π N δ 2π ϕi = N j ϕ ϕ + 2π i i i δ n

Chain of single Josephson junctions: classical regime E J >>E C ϕ 1 ϕ 2 N ϕ N δ = i= 1 ϕ i ϕ = i δ N δ 2π ϕ j = + 2π N δ 2π ϕi = N NE J E(δ) E pot = i E J [1 cos( ϕ )] = NEJ [1 cos(( δ -2π )/ N)] Phase-slip i 2πN δ

Chain of single Josephson junctions: classical regime E J >>E C ϕ 1 ϕ 2 N ϕ N δ = i= 1 ϕ i ϕ = i δ N NE J E(δ) E m EJ 2N ( δ + 2πm ) Critical current of chain: I c πi N c 2 Phase-slip 2πN δ

Phase biased Josephson junction array δ = ϕi ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ϕ N ~δ/n N i= 1 Hψ m ψ Nv( ψ ψ ) 1 = E + m m m 1 m+ E(δ) E m Matveev et al (2002) EJ = m 2N ( 2π ˆ δ ) 2 m-1 m m+1 δ/2π E L L = 2 π = 2L N E J 2 h 2e Quantum variable

d Mathieu equation for Josephson array ψ ( q) 2 dq 2 E 2Nν + + cos 2q ψ ( q) = 0 EL EL E Pot =-ev c cos(2q) E(δ) 1> q/2e m-1 m m+1 0> 2e L q&& + Rq& + V sin( 2πq /(2e)) = c V bias δ/2π

Energy spectrum and current-phase relation of chain E J /E c =20 E J /E c =3 E J /E c =1.3

Sample set-up Sample caracteristics: Single junction in chain R J =6kΩ C J =1.2fF Read-out Josephson junction: R=1kΩ Area ratio between big loop and SQUID loop: 285

Measurement of the current-phase relation I I I bias bias = = I I chain chain + I J (γ) + I C sin( Γ) I << Chain c I J c I bias = I chain Φ 2π Φ 0 π + 2 I c π sin 2 Current-phase relation yields information on the ground state I S ( γ ) E γ = 0

Measurement of the current-phase relation II Large Josephson junction: I sw =710nA PhD: Ioan Pop, to be published

Measurement of the current-phase relation III Fitting parameters: R=16kΩ PhD: Ioan Pop, to be published

Josephson junction rhombi chain δ Phase bias and frustration: Φ c f = δ = Φ R 2πΦ Φ Φ c 0 0, f=0 eff J E, E eff c Chain of Josephson junctions with effective E J and E C f=0.5 Chain of N spins 2 N possible states

Measurement of the current-phase relation δ I Φ c S R Chain c I << I J c S L =10*S R Current-phase relation yields information on the ground state I S (I. Pop et al.,phys. Rev. B, 78, 104504 (2008)) E δ = 0

Current-phase relation at f=0: classical regime E J /E C ~20 E(δ) I S E δ = 0 δ (I. Pop et al.,phys. Rev. B, 78, 104504 (2008))

Current-phase relation at f=0: quantum regime E J /E C ~2 I S E δ = 0 Hψ υ S Rhombus 0 A m = 2 = Em m N ( m 1 + m+ 1 = 8E E ψ 4.50( E Aexp( S c J 3 J E C ) 1/ 4 υ ψ (I. Pop et al.,phys. Rev. B, 78, 104504 (2008)) 0 ) ψ )

Current phase relation at f=0.5 δ I(δ)

Measurement of the ground state energy in the classical regime (1) f=0 Phase slips across Rhombi m=-1 m=0 m=1 > (I. Pop et al.,phys. Rev. B, 78, 104504 (2008)) 0.5 f

Measurement of the ground state energy in the classical regime (2) f=0.48 > > (I. Pop et al.,phys. Rev. B, 78, 104504 (2008)) 0.5 f

Measurement of the ground state energy in the classical regime (3) (I. Pop et al.,phys. Rev. B, 78, 104504 (2008)) f=0.5 Odd number of spin up Even number of spin up 0.5 f

Measurement of the ground state energy in the classical regime (4) (I. Pop et al.,phys. Rev. B, 78, 104504 (2008)) > > > >

Towards a topologically protected qubit? Add quantum fluctuations at f=0.5 in order to lift the degeneracy of the states

Idea of topologically protected qubit [ M ] N Kitaev et al (2003) δe N 1

Energy spectrum of a rhombi chain at half flux frustration I + 0; γ = 0 1; γ = 0 + 0; γ = π 1; γ = π

Lev Ioffe and Benoit Doucot unpublished 1 0 ) ( 0 0 + Φ Φ = Ψ Ψ N N J t i qubit E e δ δϕ δϕ ϕ Energy spectrum of a rhombi chain at half flux frustration II

Proposed sample V(ϕ) E 2 (δ) 01 12 0 α 0> -β π> β 0> +α π> ϕ π Lev Ioffe and Benoit Doucot unpublished

Phase-charge qubit: Asymmetric Cooper pair transistor H ACPT 2 ( Qψ + CgVg ) = 2e j cos( Ψ δ / 2) cos( δ / 2) 2 e j 2C ψ sin( Ψ δ / 2) sin( δ / 2) Charging energy Josephson energy δ tunable -1> 0> 1> E J /E C =1