Illinois River Sediment Quality and Beneficial Use Options

Similar documents
BACKWATER RESTORATION OPPORTUNITIES: ILLINOIS RIVER. John C. Marlin

Beneficial Use of Illinois River Sediment for Agricultural and Landscaping Applications. John C. Marlin

East Branch Grand Calumet River Great Lakes Legacy Act Sediment Remediation and Restoration Project

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

Stickney Avenue Depositional Zone (SADZ) Investigation

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

January Submitted by: 2200 Commonwealth Blvd, Suite 300 Ann Arbor, MI Ph: Fax:

Source Control Early Action Focused Feasibility Study

Sediment Management in the Coastal Bays

Heather Schlosser Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Studies Group August 28, 2008

ATTACHMENT A WEAVER BOTTOMS SEDIMENT BASIN MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROJECT REPORT SUMMARY (APRIL 7, 2014)

Red River Levee Panel

April 9, Phosphate Mining and Reclamation Overview

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

Long-Distance Pumping and Opportunities for Engineering with Nature

A PRIMER ON DAM REMOVALS IN MICHIGAN. Joe Rathbun Michigan Dept. Environmental Quality

State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Fish Passage Studies III: Sediment Redistribution and Impact Analysis: Springborn Dam - Enfield, Connecticut

Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Regional Sediment Management

3. MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Aquatic Sediment Sampling and Analyses

Estimating Remedial Volumes for a GLLA Project on the Milwaukee River

Redwood City Harbor, California, Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study. Appendix D. Geotechnical Engineering. DRAFT April 2015

Description DESCRIPTION

Port of Kalama, 2013 TEMCO Berth Maintenance Dredging and In-water Flow-Lane Placement Project

PEORIA LAKE SEDIMENT INVESTIGATION

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

RANCHO de DOS PALMAS DAVIS, California, AC +/-

Curriculum Links AS and A level Field Studies

Lake Sedimentation Survey of Siloam Springs State Park Lake, Adams County, Illinois

Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment

EVALUATION OF SEDIMENT REMOVAL OPTIONS AND BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL FOR ILLINOIS RIVER RESTORATION: PRELIMINARY REPORT

Seagrass Transplantation & Environmental & Marine Consulting Services, Inc. Drew Campbell, Vice President & Lead Scientst.

CRUM RANCH AREA MAP YOLO COUNTY, California, AC +/-

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Custom Soil Resource Report. Soil Map. Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 14N WGS84. Feet.

Overview of Methods. Terrestrial areas that are most important for conservation Conservation

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

March 13, 2015 Presented at the Western Dredging Association, Midwest Chapter Meeting March 11 13, 2015, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Crows Landing Naval Base Easement

Displayed with permission The American Surveyor Vol. 9 No. 8 Copyright 2012 Cheves Media

Appendix I. Dredged Volume Estimates. Draft Contractor Document: Subject to Continuing Agency Review

Surface Water Short Study Guide

Home About Us Articles Press Releases Image Gallery Contact Us Media Kit Free Subscription 10/5/2006 5:56:35 PM

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Ecological Land Cover Classification For a Natural Resources Inventory in the Kansas City Region, USA

Grand Canyon Sediment Augmentation Study. Tim Randle, P.E. Manager, Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Denver, Colorado

Procedure for Determining Near-Surface Pollution Sensitivity

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Planning for the Future of Humboldt Bay: Sea Level Rise, Sediment Management, Sand Spits and Salt Marshes. Joel Gerwein


Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

GEOG 1010 B. Come to the PASS workshop with your mock exam complete. During the workshop you can work with other students to review your work.

This is start of the single grain view

Weathering and Soil Formation. Chapter 10

Shallow Karst Aquifer System of the Lake Belt Study Area, Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA EXTENDED ABSTRACT

ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Studying Rocks and Soil

How & Where does infiltration work? Summary of Geologic History Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

Habitat Assessment. Peggy Compton UW-Extension Water Action Volunteers Program Coordinator

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

THIN-LAYER PLACEMENT OF DREDGE MATERIAL FOR MARSH NOURISHMENT, RESOTRATION, AND RESPONSE TO SEA LEVEL RISE

BUNCOMBE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Chapter Five. Synopsis

Material Workshop. Galveston District 2012 Beneficial Use of Dredged. Material Workshop. Custodians of the Coast

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Environmental impact assessment study of the new offshore dumping sites for Šventoji port in Lithuania

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Atchison County Lake, Atchison County, Kansas

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (# )

Sampling Sediment and Porewaterin the Lower Willamette River St. Helens, Oregon. Henning Larsen, R.G. Oregon Dept of Environmental Quality

River Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

ΛTKINS. Applications of Regional Sediment Management Concepts in Texas Estuarine Restoration Projects. Riparian Workshop Fort Worth, October 17, 2012

Instream Sediment Control Systems

Geomorphology Of The Chilliwack River Watershed Landform Mapping At North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Washington By National Park Service

SILT FENCE EFFECTIVENESS

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

GTU. Shantilal Shah Engineering College, Bhavnagar

Sediment Conditions In Backwater Lakes Along The Illinois River - Phase 2. by.

Earth Science, 10e. Edward J. Tarbuck & Frederick K. Lutgens

Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers. Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc.

GALVESTON BAY RSM Moving toward an Integrated, Cooperative, and Holistic Approach to Estuarine Sediments

Considerations for Mechanical Dredging, Hydraulic Dredging and Mechanical Dewatering of Sediments

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

Clyde River Landslide

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Passive, Adsorbent-Based Sediment Pore Water Sampling

Characterization of Contaminant and Biomass-Derived Organic Matter in Sediments from the Lower Passaic River, New Jersey, USA

Introduction to the Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) Classification System

Fig 1. Steps in the EcoValue Project

Transcription:

Illinois River Sediment Quality and Beneficial Use Options John C. Marlin Illinois Sustainable Technology Center Robert G. Darmody Dept. of Natural Resources and Environmental Science University of Illinois

Reservoirs, river backwaters, and detention ponds are filling with sediment washed from land and stream banks. This destroys aquatic habitat, recreational potential and water supply functions. If a use can be found for the sediment, dredging to restore water depth becomes more feasible. Dredged material with suitable chemical and physical properties can provide needed topsoil at a variety of sites. This beneficial use can make dredging more economical as value is added at the restored site as well as the location receiving soil. It will also reduce the amount of soil taken from one area to benefit another.

Some Acknowledgements Dr. Robert Darmody Dr. Misganaw Demissie Richard Cahill Dr. Nani Bohwmik Jim Slowikowski DNR Field Staff and Site Managers Illinois river Coordinating Council Midwest Foundation Artco Fleeting Caterpillar Inc Kress Corp Brennan Marine Tricounty Regional Planning Commission

Beneficial Use as Soil can Restore economic and ecological values in aquatic systems Provide soil for restoration and remediation Reduce the need for taking soil from one area to benefit another

The Illinois State Water Survey operates a coring rig capable of penetrating ten feet of mud. The cores are carefully opened in a laboratory, photographed, and described. Slices are taken along the length for chemical analysis, fertility testing, agronomic characterization, and determination of various physical properties.

Evaluation of Sediment Cores Potential Chemical Contaminants Agronomic Fertility Soil Classification and Consistence Grain Size Moisture Content, Density, etc.

Cores collected from Putnam to Cass County have been analyzed and described. The following slides provide draft data on the properties of several cores. Collectively they illustrate the differences within individual locations as well as over the length of a core. These differences are due to such factors as the depth of water created by the diversion and dams, sedimentation rates, and discharge of chemical contaminants over the decades.

Upper and Lower Segments of Cores in Various Ill River Lakes Goose Lk.,. Fulton Co. 295a 0 38 cm 295c 50 84 cm Lower Peoria Lk. Near Channel, River mile 163.5 195a 0 48 cm 195 f 196 243 cm Sawyer Slough (lower end) Marshal Co. 277a 0 36 cm 277d 90 122 cm

Six Segments of Core 384 from inside East Port Marina Lower Peoria Lk. 384a 0-34 cm 384c 62-97 cm 384e 121-157 cm 384f 156-195 cm 384h 215-249 cm 384j 255-280 cm

Texture and Organic Matter of Sediment along East Port Channel in Lower Peoria Lake at Various Depths Approximate depth in cm Core 195 USDA Texture Core 197 USDA Texture Core 384 USDA texture 20 40 Silty Clay Loam Silt Loam Silty Clay 100 120 Silty Clay Loam Sandy Loam Peaty 170 190 Silty Clay Loam Silty Clay Loam Clay Loam 250 270 Silty Clay Loam Silty Clay Loam Silty Clay Organic matter content at various depths Core 195 Core 197 Core 384 Composite 8 260 cm = 4.4% 26 28 cm = 4.6% 10 22 cm = 4.35 % 66 68 cm = 5.3% 90 52 cm = 49.7 % 106 108 cm = 3.9% 170 192 cm = 2.79 % 146 228 cm = 1.9% 210 272 cm = 3.21 %

Selected Physical and Agronomic Properties of Core 279 from Babb s Slough Depth cm consistence (feel) texture (feel) % sand (feel) moisture (% wet) organic matter % extractable P ppm 6 8 59 30 32 paste Silt Loam (peaty) <1 10 57 46 48 40 50 52 paste Silty Clay Loam 12 8 37 86 88 24 70 92 very friable Silty Clay 16 3.2 44 150 172 friable Silty Clay Loam 17 2 14 206 208 18 210 232 friable Sandy Loam 80 1 7 core 279

Physical and Agronomic Properties of Core 277 from Babb s Slough Depth cm consistence (feel) texture (feel) % sand (feel) moisture (% wet) organic matter % extractable P ppm 6 8 56 fluid Silty Clay 10 12 Loam 7 3.8 56 paste Silty Clay 30 32 Loam 5 3.8 56 46 48 33 50 52 very firm Silty Clay 5 2.4 23 70 72 firm Silty Clay 12 2.4 23 86 88 19 firm 90 92 Clay Loam 40 1 11 friable 110 112 Clay Loam 45 1 11 core 277

Contaminant Testing 24 metals 22 pesticides 7 PCB arachlors 72 semi volatile organics, including PAH

Concentration of Selected Chemicals in Sediment Cores from Various Backwater Lakes in Illinois (preliminary data) Chemical Arsenic mg/kg Lead mg/kg Zinc mg/kg Dieldrin ug/kg PCB 1254 ug/kg BAP ug/kg Wightman Lk. Lacon IL. Ill. River N=5 9.6 R 6.4 13 58.6 R 32 84 246 R 140 320 <22 R 55.4 R 22 130 762 R 150 2200 Babb Slough Lacon IL. Ill. River N=7 4.9 R 2.9 6.8 19.4 R 13 30 92.1 R 56 160 < 12 R 25.9 R 11 59 104 R 23 430 Lower Peoria Lk. (East Port) Ill. River N=8 7.3 R 5.3 9.6 42.5 R29 67 192.5 R 130 310 < 22 R 91 R 32 210 194 R60 340 Muscootin Bay Beardstown Ill. River N=3 5.0 R.81 7.6 15.6 R 5.7 22 58.7 R 14 85 < 2.9 R < 28 R <56 R N= number of cores, R = range, core length varies from.7 to over 2 meters, * J values Sturgeon Bay, New Boston IL Miss. River N=5 6.2 R 4.1 8.4 19.8 R 15 24 88 R 68 110 <6 R < 26 R 14.2 R 7.5 26*

Concentration of Selected Chemicals from Sediment Cores in Wightman Lake near Lacon Core / Chemical 269 8 250 cm 252 8 250 cm 268 8 246 cm 254 8 190 cm 267 10 112 cm ISWS map Arsenic mg/kg Lead mg/kg Zinc mg/kg Dieldrin ug/kg PCB 1254 ug/kg BAP ug/kg 13 12 6.5 10 7.7 84 72 39 66 43 300 320 190 280 190 <22 <17 <12 <6.6 <4.3 40 130 37 68 35 2200 550 160 750 240

Concentration of Selected Chemicals in Segments of Sediment Core 197 from East Port Channel, Lower Peoria Lake Core/ Chemical 197 8 90 cm 197 108 134 cm 197 148 230cm Arsenic mg/kg 5.3 2.3 1.7 ISWS Map Lead mg/kg 40 17 8.9 Zinc mg/kg 190 90 41 Dieldrin ug/kg PCB 1254 ug/kg <16 <3.5 <22 78 <35 <44 BAP ug/kg 240 72 44

Sediment has been used as topsoil at several sites in Illinois including a strip mined area, three landfills, and two industrial sites converted to parks. The following slides show the placement of mud from the Illinois River at East Peoria on the Banner Marsh State Fish and Wildlife Area and the Pekin Landfill. Both sites experienced excellent plant growth on the sediment which was easily handled by conventional equipment.

July 22, 2004, Banner Marsh

August 17, 2004, Banner Marsh

March 18, 2005 Banner Marsh

June 22, 2006 Banner Marsh

July 7, 2007 Banner Marsh

Pekin Landfill October 2007

Pekin landfill August 2008 clay liner/sediment cap

jmarlin@istc.illinois.edu rdarmody@illinois.edu Illinois Sustainable Technology Center: www.istc.illinois.edu (click initiatives) Illinois River Decision Support System http://ilrdss.sws.illinois.edu/