Lecture 4. Chapter 11 Nise. Controller Design via Frequency Response. G. Hovland 2004

Similar documents
376 CHAPTER 6. THE FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN METHOD. D(s) = we get the compensated system with :

SKEE 3143 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN. CHAPTER 3 Compensator Design Using the Bode Plot

Lecture 8. PID control. Industrial process control ( today) PID control. Insights about PID actions

Homework 12 Solution - AME30315, Spring 2013

Digital Control System

Lecture 5 Introduction to control

ECE 3510 Root Locus Design Examples. PI To eliminate steady-state error (for constant inputs) & perfect rejection of constant disturbances

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

ME 375 FINAL EXAM Wednesday, May 6, 2009

6.447 rad/sec and ln (% OS /100) tan Thus pc. the testing point is s 3.33 j5.519

Root Locus Contents. Root locus, sketching algorithm. Root locus, examples. Root locus, proofs. Root locus, control examples

Chapter 9: Controller design. Controller design. Controller design

G(s) = 1 s by hand for! = 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 rad/sec.

The state variable description of an LTI system is given by 3 1O. Statement for Linked Answer Questions 3 and 4 :

Function and Impulse Response

Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Modeling, Dynamics and Control III Spring 2002

Lecture 8 - SISO Loop Design

MM1: Basic Concept (I): System and its Variables

Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 7. Steady-State Errors ) Prof. Kwang-Chun Ho Tel: Fax:

MODERN CONTROL SYSTEMS

Gain and Phase Margins Based Delay Dependent Stability Analysis of Two- Area LFC System with Communication Delays

Analysis of Stability &

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN OF STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS AND STATE OBSERVERS USING REDUCED ORDER MODEL

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Control and Dynamical Systems

Module 4: Time Response of discrete time systems Lecture Note 1

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dynamics and Control II

Feedback Control Systems (FCS)

THE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL TWO-DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM SEMISTRONGLY STABILIZING CONTROLLERS. Tatsuya Hoshikawa, Kou Yamada and Yuko Tatsumi

Lecture #9 Continuous time filter

Lag-Lead Compensator Design

Chapter 7. Root Locus Analysis

EE/ME/AE324: Dynamical Systems. Chapter 8: Transfer Function Analysis

EE Control Systems LECTURE 14

Lecture 6: Resonance II. Announcements

NAME (pinyin/italian)... MATRICULATION NUMBER... SIGNATURE

Control Systems Analysis and Design by the Root-Locus Method

Compensation Techniques

Chapter #4 EEE8013. Linear Controller Design and State Space Analysis. Design of control system in state space using Matlab

ME 375 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Friday December 17, 2004

HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #2

Homework Assignment No. 3 - Solutions

MM7. PID Control Design

EE105 - Fall 2005 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits

into a discrete time function. Recall that the table of Laplace/z-transforms is constructed by (i) selecting to get

Root Locus Diagram. Root loci: The portion of root locus when k assume positive values: that is 0

S_LOOP: SINGLE-LOOP FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

State Space: Observer Design Lecture 11

Lecture 10 Filtering: Applied Concepts

CONTROL OF INTEGRATING PROCESS WITH DEAD TIME USING AUTO-TUNING APPROACH

Given the following circuit with unknown initial capacitor voltage v(0): X(s) Immediately, we know that the transfer function H(s) is

ME2142/ME2142E Feedback Control Systems

Wolfgang Hofle. CERN CAS Darmstadt, October W. Hofle feedback systems

1 Routh Array: 15 points

The Root Locus Method

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Root Locus Analysis

16.400/453J Human Factors Engineering. Manual Control II

Fractional-Order PI Speed Control of a Two-Mass Drive System with Elastic Coupling

Feedback Control System Fundamentals

EE 4443/5329. LAB 3: Control of Industrial Systems. Simulation and Hardware Control (PID Design) The Inverted Pendulum. (ECP Systems-Model: 505)

March 18, 2014 Academic Year 2013/14

A Simplified Methodology for the Synthesis of Adaptive Flight Control Systems

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Section Induction motor drives

5.5 Application of Frequency Response: Signal Filters

55:041 Electronic Circuits

Chapter 13. Root Locus Introduction

Pusan National University

Stability. ME 344/144L Prof. R.G. Longoria Dynamic Systems and Controls/Lab. Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin

Solutions. Digital Control Systems ( ) 120 minutes examination time + 15 minutes reading time at the beginning of the exam

Chapter 6 Control Systems Design by Root-Locus Method. Lag-Lead Compensation. Lag lead Compensation Techniques Based on the Root-Locus Approach.

Correction for Simple System Example and Notes on Laplace Transforms / Deviation Variables ECHE 550 Fall 2002

Multivariable Control Systems

Chapter 10. Closed-Loop Control Systems

EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 1 Solution (Fall 2010) Wenjie Chen and Jansen Sheng, UC Berkeley

ME 375 EXAM #1 Tuesday February 21, 2006

Today s Lecture. Block Diagrams. Block Diagrams: Examples. Block Diagrams: Examples. Closed Loop System 06/03/2017

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY School of Engineering Science ENSC 320 Electric Circuits II. R 4 := 100 kohm

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY School of Engineering Science ENSC 320 Electric Circuits II. Solutions to Assignment 3 February 2005.

EXTENDED STABILITY MARGINS ON CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR NONLINEAR INPUT DELAY SYSTEMS. Otto J. Roesch, Hubert Roth, Asif Iqbal

Lecture Notes II. As the reactor is well-mixed, the outlet stream concentration and temperature are identical with those in the tank.

DYNAMIC REDESIGN OF A FLOW CONTROL SERVO-VALVE USING A PRESSURE CONTROL PILOT

Figure 1 Siemens PSSE Web Site

What lies between Δx E, which represents the steam valve, and ΔP M, which is the mechanical power into the synchronous machine?

PI control system design for Electromagnetic Molding Machine based on Linear Programing

Quantifying And Specifying The Dynamic Response Of Flowmeters

ECEN620: Network Theory Broadband Circuit Design Fall 2018

Design By Emulation (Indirect Method)

Contents lecture 4. Automatic Control III. Summary of lecture 3 (II/II) Summary of lecture 3 (I/II) Lecture 4 Controller structures and control design

Homework #7 Solution. Solutions: ΔP L Δω. Fig. 1

6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 6: Steady-State Errors Prof. Joel L. Dawson S -

Reduction of Multiple Subsystems

RaneNote BESSEL FILTER CROSSOVER

Part A: Signal Processing. Professor E. Ambikairajah UNSW, Australia

Figure 1: Unity Feedback System

CHEAP CONTROL PERFORMANCE LIMITATIONS OF INPUT CONSTRAINED LINEAR SYSTEMS

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2004 Homework 4 Solution November 14,

HIGHER-ORDER FILTERS. Cascade of Biquad Filters. Follow the Leader Feedback Filters (FLF) ELEN 622 (ESS)

Resonant Load Control Methods for Industrial Servo Drives

Parameter Setting Method of Fractional Order PI λ D μ Controller Based on Bode s Ideal Transfer Function and its Application in Buck Converter

CONTROL SYSTEMS. Chapter 2 : Block Diagram & Signal Flow Graphs GATE Objective & Numerical Type Questions

Transcription:

METR4200 Advanced Control Lecture 4 Chapter Nie Controller Deign via Frequency Repone G. Hovland 2004 Deign Goal Tranient repone via imple gain adjutment Cacade compenator to improve teady-tate error Cacade compenator to improve tranient repone Cacade compenator to improve both teady-tate error and tranient repone Deign via frequency repone parallel deign via rootlocu. In many cae deign via frequency repone i eaier (ref ection.)

The Simplet Controller: The P-Controller u(t) - K G() y(t) Goal: Relate the value of K to percentage overhoot in y(t) for a tep repone in u(t) Gain Adjutment and Percentage Overhoot Firt tep: relate percentage overhoot to phae margin From lecture note 2, we have Phae Margin of 65 o give no peaking Note: Thi i an approximation for a 2 nd order ytem. Derivation of thi curve in Nie page 652-653

2 nd Step: Phae Margin v Gain Adjutment Example.: P-control of DC motor Thi i a imple control problem for a DC motor. The function /(+36) i the tranfer function from torque to peed, given by Inertia of motor and load J w & + Dw τ Vicou friction

For a 9.5% tep-repone overhoot, find K Chooe firt K3.6 to tart curve at 0dB at w0. yield ζ 0.6 Example.: Damping Ratio v. Phae Margin ζ 0.6 PM 59 o A alway, thi i an approximation for a 2 nd order ytem. In the DC motor cae, thi approximation i valid becaue of the amplifier dynamic.

Example.: Locate Phae-Margin 59 o 44.2dB increae required Final K 3.6 x 44.2 db 583.9 w4.5 rad/ec Characteritic of Gain-Compenated DC Motor Note thi error contant. A better controller would increae K v. Note thi frequency! Thi i not a particularly fat controlled DC motor. But we have achieved the goal on overhoot. Thee deign improvement are the next topic!

Table 7.2: Steady-State Error Chapter.3: Lag Compenation Low frequency gain not affected by lag compenator Untable! Stable A lag compenator allow a large low-freq. gain while avoiding intability!

Deign Procedure: Lag-Compenator t tep: Set the gain to the value that atifie the teady-tate error pecification (ee Table 7.2) Deign Procedure: Lag-Compenator 2 nd tep: Find frequency w p where the phae margin i 5 o to 2 o greater than phae margin that yield deired tranient repone. Thi margin i needed ince the lag compenator itelf contribute with negative phae. (The name "lag" come from the negative phae) 0dB decade -20dB/decade { { 5 o to 2 o margin: w p Select upper break decade below Select low freq. gain at 0dB and lope -20 db/decade

Frequency Repone of Lag-Compenator Need factor 0. to reduce low-freq. gain to 0dB -2 o 5 o to 2 o region decade margin to enure Frequency repone plot of a lag compenator, G c () ( + 0.)/( + 0.0) Example.2 Ue Bode diagram to deign a lag-compenator to yield a tenfold improvement in teady-tate error over the imple P-controller while keeping the overhoot at 9.5%

Example.2: t Step t tep: Gain K 0 x 583.9 G( ) 583,900 ( + 36)( + 00) Example.2: 2 nd Step 9.5% overhoot gave 59.2 o phae margin in Ex.. Increae thi margin to 69.2 o (5 o -2 o extra) 24dB 69.2 o margin at w p 9.8 rad/

Example.3: 3 rd tep -24dB 0.062 rad/ec decade, ie. 0.98 rad/ec 0.063( + 0.98) Lag-Compenator for DC motor: G c ( ) ( + 0.062) Characteritic of Lag-Compenated DC Motor Tenfold improvement in teady-tate error contant Overhoot remain the ame, becaue of phae margin. The only drawback

Chapter.4: Lead Compenation Goal Increae phae margin to reduce percentage overhoot (from B to D) Increae croover frequency to realie a fater tranient repone (from A to C) Lead-Compenator G c + ( ) T, < + T "Lead" becaue phae angle are poitive

Lead-Compenator Max Value φ w w φ G c Nie, Page 703 T in + ( jw ) Deign Procedure: Lead Compenator t tep: Find the cloed-loop bandwidth w bw required to meet the ettling time, peak time or rie time (ee Lecture 2 Note) 2 nd tep: The lead compenator ha negligible effect at low frequencie. Hence, et gain K to atify teadytate error. 3 rd tep: Plot Bode for gain value of tep 2. Determine the uncompenated ytem' phae margin. (Could alo be untable) 4 th tep: Find phae margin to determine overhoot requirement (2 nd order approximation). Evaluate additional phae needed from lead compenator

Deign Procedure: Lead Compenator 5 th tep: Determine the value of from phae contribution (φ arcin( (-) / (+) ) 6 th tep: Place w at C. Find T from G c w Plot Bode for compenated ytem. Repeat tep -6 if neceary T + ( ) T, < + T Example.3 Ue Bode diagram to deign a lead-compenator to yield a 20% overhoot and K v 40, with a peak time of 0. econd

Example.3 20% overhoot ζ0.456 T p 0. w bw 46.6 rad/ec K v 40 00K G( ) ( + 36)( + 00) yield K 40 x 36 440 Example.3: Bode plot with K440 ζ0.456 give PM48. o Uncompenated phae margin 34 o at w A 29.6 rad/ec We need an extra 4. o PM. Since w bw will increae, we add 0 o margin Total lead compenation 24. o

Example.3 φ 24. o yield 0.42 G c (jw ) 3.76 db Check next where the uncompenated ytem pae through -3.76 db (tep 6) Yield w 39 rad/ec Hence, T 25.3 Bandwidth w bw 68.8 rad/ec w φ G c T in + ( jw ) Characteritic of Lead-Compenated DC Motor G c + ( ) T + T 2.38 + + 25.3 60.2 Significant bandwidth improvement!

Chapter.5: Lag-Lead Compenation Lag Compenation improve mainly teady-tate error (ie. gain at low frequencie can be raied) and/or tabilie the ytem Lead Compenation improve mainly tranient behaviour (ie. croover frequency can be raied) Lag-Lead Compenation i an attempt to achieve both improvement at once Lag-Lead Compenation G ( ) c G lead ( ) G lag ( ) + + + T T2 γ + T γt 2 Deign parameter T, T 2 and γ Note relation between γ and / See Table 9.0 in Nie

Lag-Lead Compenation: Bode Plot Deign Procedure: Lag-Lead Compenation t tep: Find the cloed-loop bandwidth w bw required to meet the ettling time, peak time or rie time (ee Lecture 2 Note) 2 nd tep: The lag-lead compenator ha negligible effect at low frequencie. Hence, et gain K to atify teadytate error. 3 rd tep: Plot Bode for gain value of tep 2. Determine the uncompenated ytem' phae margin. 4 th tep: Find phae margin to determine overhoot requirement (2 nd order approximation).

Deign Procedure: Lag-Lead Compenation 5 th tep: Select a croover frequency w c near (below) w bw 6 th tep: At w c determine additional amount of phae required. Add a margin of 5 o -0 o. Thi amount determine γ. Ue γ / and lead compenation figure.8. 7 th tep: Deign lag compenator firt. Select upper break frequency decade below w c T 2 8 th tep: Deign lead compenator. w c w /(T ) give T 9 th tep: Plot Bode for compenated ytem and repeat -8 if neceary Example.4 Given the ytem below where G( ) ( K + )( + deign a lead-lag compenator uing Bode plot to yield a 3.25% overhoot, peak time of 2 econd and K v 2. 4)

Example.4 3.25% overhoot ζ0.54 which yield PM 55 o Tp 2.0 w bw 2.29 rad/ec K v 2 G( ) ( yield K 2 x 4 48 K + )( + 4) Example.4: Bode plot for K48 Step 5: Select w c.8 (< 2.29) Phae-76 o Lead Compenation required: 5 o +5 o

Example.4: (γ and T 2 ) Upper break decade below w c. Hence /T 2 0.8 or T 2 5.56 56 o at w c.8 rad/ec yield 0.094 and γ/0.6 φ ) ( in + jw G T w c Example.4: T / T 0.56 when w c w Final lead-lag deign: where T.79, T 2 5.56, γ0.6 φ ) ( in + jw G T w c + + + + 2 2 ) ( ) ( ) ( T T T T G G G lag lead c γ γ

Characteritic of Lead-Lag Compenated Sytem The reult below could not have been achieved with lag or lead compenation alone! The deign approach i approximate. Redeign ometime neceary