Bridge Construction: Reducing Disaster Risk

Similar documents
Liquefaction and Foundations

Chapter 6 Seismic Design of Bridges. Kazuhiko Kawashima Tokyo Institute of Technology

NPTEL Online - IIT Kanpur. Course Name Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Department IIT Kanpur

Liquefaction. Ajanta Sachan. Assistant Professor Civil Engineering IIT Gandhinagar. Why does the Liquefaction occur?

DETAILED INVESTIGATION OF PILES DAMAGED BY HYOGOKEN NAMBU EARTHQUAKE

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES

Effective stress analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soil

Caltrans Guidelines on Foundation Loading Due to Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading

Earthquake Risk in Canada and the National Building Code

Tsukuba, Japan International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Building Research Institute STUDY TRIP TO ITAKO CITY

NPTEL Video Course on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake

A Presentation By: Dr. G. M. Dar Centre for Disaster Management & Env. Studies, J&K IMPA, Srinagar

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AGE OF GROUND AND LIQUEFACTION OCCURRENCE IN THE 2011 GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE

Technical Article TRICOLITE. Pledged to Excellence SAFE, EFFICIENT, RELIABLE POWER DISTRIBUTION SOLUTIONS

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Centrifuge Shaking Table Tests and FEM Analyses of RC Pile Foundation and Underground Structure

Gutenberg-Richter recurrence law to seismicity analysis of Bangladesh

LIQUEFACTION BEHAVIOUR OF SAND DURING VIBRATIONS

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt

Numerical Modelling of Dynamic Earth Force Transmission to Underground Structures

LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOILS IN HIMALAYAN REGION

Geotechnical issues in seismic assessments: When do I need a geotechnical specialist?

Guidelines on Foundation Loading and Deformation Due to Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading

Paper presented in the Annual Meeting of Association of American Geographers, Las Vegas, USA, March 2009 ABSTRACT

Seismic Vulnerabilities of Multnomah County s Willamette River Bridges November 6, 2014

Seismic design of bridges

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

Earthquake Disaster Management in India

Residual Deformation Analyses to Demonstrate the Effect of Thin Steel Sheet Piles on Liquefaction-Induced Penetration Settlement of Wooden Houses

Study of the liquefaction phenomenon due to an earthquake: case study of Urayasu city

Geology 229 Engineering Geology Lecture 27. Earthquake Engineering (Reference West, Ch. 18)

Earthquakes and Earth s Interior

BI-DIRECTIONAL SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BRIDGE STEEL TRUSS PIERS ALLOWING A CONTROLLED ROCKING RESPONSE

STUDIES ON SEVARAL COUNTERMEASURES AGAINST LIQUEFACTION-INDUCED FLOW AND AN APPLIVATION OF A MEASURE TO EXISTING BRIDGES IN TOKYO

NON LINEAR SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION : IMPACT ON THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF STRUTURES. Alain PECKER

Geology, Soils, and Seismicity

EFFECT OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT ON FAILURE MODE OF RC BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS

EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING IN BANGLADESH AND ITS SURROUNDING REGIONS

ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED FIXED HEADED SINGLE FLOATING PILE IN MULTILAYERED SOIL USING BEF APPROACH

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

Earthquake hazards. Aims 1. To know how hazards are classified 2. To be able to explain how the hazards occur 3. To be able to rank order hazards

ASSESSING OREGON S SEISMIC RISK

Important Concepts. Earthquake hazards can be categorized as:

Spatial variation of maximum considered and design basis earthquakes in peninsular India

Ground Motion Studies for Critical Sites in North-West Bangladesh

PROBABILISTIC LIQUEFACTION HAZARD ANALYSIS IN JAPAN

Seismic Design of Bridges

Word Cards. 2 map. 1 geographic representation. a description or portrayal of the Earth or parts of the Earth. a visual representation of an area

PILE DESIGN IN LIQUEFYING SOIL

A STUDY ON DAMAGE TO STEEL PIPE PILE FOUNDATION ON RECLAIMED LAND DURING HYOGO-KEN-NANBU EARTHQUAKE

IZMIT BAY BRIDGE SOUTH APPROACH VIADUCT: SEISMIC DESIGN NEXT TO THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT

WHAT SEISMIC HAZARD INFORMATION THE DAM ENGINEERS NEED FROM SEISMOLOGISTS AND GEOLOGISTS?

[Hussain, 4(9): September 2017] ISSN DOI /zenodo Impact Factor

CHARACTERISTICS OF NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTION OF DHARAMSALA EARTHQUAKE OF 1986

REPORT ON THE TOHOKU AREA PASIFIC OFFSHORE EARTHQUAKE

EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION TESTS OF BRIDGE COLUMN MODELS DAMAGED DURING 1995 KOBE EARTHQUAKE

Earthquake Distribution in Northeast India from

9. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS

Estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration for Delhi Region using Finsim, a Finite Fault Simulation Technique

Special feature: Are its lessons being adequately applied? Follow-up on the ten-year anniversary of the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake

INELASTIC RESPONSES OF LONG BRIDGES TO ASYNCHRONOUS SEISMIC INPUTS

Seminar Worked examples on Bridge Design with Eurocodes

RESIDUAL DEFORMATION OF CAISSON, SHEET PILE AND GROUND BY SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS

NZ Transport Agency s Detailed Design Guidance for Piled Bridges at Sites Prone to Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading

PROTECTING MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL SETTINGS FROM THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE

Impacts of 2014 Chiangrai Earthquake from Geotechnical Perspectives

Project on Seismic Hazard & Vulnerability. areas, Bangladesh. Mohammad Ashraful Kamal (Geologist)

IGC. 50 th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE PSEUDOSTATIC SEISMIC ASSESMENT OF SLOPES AND ITS REMEDIATION

Single Piles in Lateral Spreads: Field Bending Moment Evaluation

Seismic Analysis of Soil-pile Interaction under Various Soil Conditions

Model tests and FE-modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction

Global Death and Construction: Earthquakes on an Urban Planet

Earthquake Response Of Structures Under Different Soil Conditions

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges. Sponsored by Mid-America Earthquake Center Technical Report MAEC RR-4 Project

Seismic Vulnerability of Oregon State Highway Bridges

Experimental Study on The Seismic Assessment of Pile Foundation in Volcanic Ash Ground

PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS AND ESTIMATION OF SPECTRAL STRONG GROUND MOTION ON BED ROCK IN NORTH EAST INDIA

Geotechnical Aspects of the Seismic Update to the ODOT Bridge Design Manual. Stuart Edwards, P.E Geotechnical Consultant Workshop

Department of Civil Engineering, Kyoto University, by Shunzo OKAMOTO, M. J. A., Sept.

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

LO1-3 List and describe the characteristics of the 4 main types of earthquake waves.

EFFECT OF STREAM-WISE SPACING OF BRIDGE PIERS ON SCOUR DEPTH

Paleoseismic Investigations for Determining the Design Ground Motions for Nuclear Power Plants

Section Forces Within Earth. 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes

2.3 Notes: Earthquake Damage Can Be Reduced

Definition 11/29/2011. Liquefaction Hazard to Bridge Foundations. Question 1. Will liquefaction occur? Mechanism of Liquefaction

Seismic Design of a Light Rail Transit Bridge with Fault Rupture Crossing

Synthetic Accelerograms due to Moderate/ Strong Earthquakes in National Capital (Delhi) Region

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM STRUCTURAL FUSE SYSTEMS

LATERAL CAPACITY OF PILES IN LIQUEFIABLE SOILS

Suhasini N. Madhekar

SIMPLIFIED METHOD IN EVALUATING LIQUEFACTION OCCURRENCE AGAINST HUGE OCEAN TRENCH EARTHQUAKE

AMPLIFICATION FROM ISOSEISMAL MAP AND SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS

The Preliminary Study of the Impact of Liquefaction on Water Pipes

Downtown Anchorage Seismic Risk Assessment & Land Use Regulations to Mitigate Seismic Risk

Eurocode 8 Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings

The seismic risk of new and existing dams

Transcription:

JAMMU-UDHAMPUR RAIL LINK Bridge Construction: Reducing Disaster Risk PROF MAHESH TANDON MANAGING DIRECTOR, TANDON CONSULTANTS PVT LTD GUEST PROFESSOR @ GANDHINAGAR FORMER DISTINGUISHED VISITING PROFESSOR IITs @ KANPUR, ROORKEE 1

2

EARTHQUAKE ENGG : INTERNATIONAL SCENARIO EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING: MAJOR MILESTONES FOR BRIDGES 1908: CRITERIA BASED ON HORIZONTAL STATIC FORCES APPLIED AT cg ITALY 1939: DRAFT VSPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGE JAPAN 1943: ACCOUNTING FOR FLEXIBILITY OF STRUCTURE WHILE EVALUATING SEISMIC DEMAND CALTRANS 1964: CONCEPT OF LIQUFACTION (Prof Mogami) AND LATERAL SPREADING JAPAN 1975: RECOGNISING THAT STRUCTURES ENTER THE INELASTIC (POST-ELASTIC) STAGE AND THAT DUCTILITY IS OF SIGNIFICANCE AASHTO 1981: CRITERIA OF INELASTIC DESIGN AND DUCTILITY REQUIREMENTS-- JAPAN

HANSHIN EXPRESSWAY KOBE EARTHQUAKE 1995

OURTESY: PRIESTLEY CONFINEMENT OF CONCRETE BY CIRCULAR AND SQUARE HOOPS

ICONIC EXAMPLE OF THE DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS OF LIQUEFACTION. 1964 Niigata earthquake. Shinano river, Niigata City SHOWA BRIDGE COLLAPSE DUE TO LIQUEFACTION, LATERAL SPREADING The post liqufaction phenomenon (few minutes after termination of main seismic action)

CHECK FOR LATERAL SPREADING: ALTERNATIVE LOADING qnl= Passive earth Pressure ql= 30% of overburden pressure JRA Provisions (1996) The non-liquefied crust exerts passive earth pressure The liquefied crust exerts passive earth pressure on the pile and the liquefied soil offers 30% of total overburden pressure.

8

FIG 32: MAJOR INDIAN EARTHQUAKES IN LAST 120 YEARS MAGNITUDE LOCATION YEAR DEATHS (RICHTER SCALE) 6.1 JABALPUR 1997? 6.8 CHAMOLI 1999 100 6.9 BHUJ 2001 13,805 7.8 NEPAL 2015 9,000 EACH INCREASE OF 1.0 IN MAGNITUDE IS A 10 FOLD INCREASE IN WAVE AMPLITUDE AND A 30 FOLD INCREASE IN ENERGY RELEASED.OVER 60% OF INDIA IS EARTHQUAKE PRONE >8.5 ASSAM 1897 1,542 8.0 KANGRA (HP) 1905 20,000 6.5 JABALPUR 1927? 7.1 DHUBRI 1930 100 8.4 BIHAR-NEPAL 1934 14,000 8.3 ASSAM 1950 1,500 7.0 ANJAR (GUJRAT) 1956 100 6.5 KOYNA 1967 200 6.6 BIHAR-NEPAL 1988 1,000 6.6 UTTARKASHI 1991 700 6.4 LATTUR 1993 10,000

ASSAM BRIDGE EARTHQUAKE, JUNE 12, 1897 MANSHAI BRIDGE EASTERN BENGAL STATE RAILWAY Catalogue of major earthquakes and post disaster survey well documented SURVEY OF INDIA APRIL 1898

ASSAM BRIDGE North Lakhimpur, Bridge on Ranganadi Earthquake: Aug. 15, 1950 COURTESY SURVEY OF INDIA 1898

SURVEY OF INDIA APRIL 1898 EXAMPLE OF LIQUEFACTION (Fine sand can result in boiling)

IRC: 6-2017 HIGHWAY BRIDGES RDSO GUIDELINES- 2015 RAILWAY BRIDGES 13

IS 1893 Part 1: 2016 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND BUILDINGS IS 1893 Part 3: 2014 BRIDGES AND RETAINING WALLS PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN NOT YET IMPLEMENTED

SEISMIC ZONE OF INDIA -IS:1893 (PART I) -IRC:6

CURRENT INDIAN SCENARIO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF EARTH SCIENCES (July 2006) National Centre for Seismology (August 2014) THE SEISMOTECTONIC ATLAS OF INDIA SHOWS EXISTENCE OF OVER 66 NEOTECTONIC/ ACTIVE FAULTS. THE HIMALAYAN BELT, EXTENDING FOR 2400 KM, IS DISSECTED BY 15 MAJOR ACTIVE FAULTS. AS PER SEISMIC ZONING OF THE COUNTRY, OVER 59% OF INDIA S LAND MASS IS UNDER THREAT OF MODERATE TO SEVERE SEISMIC HAZARD, I.E. PRONE TO SHAKING OF MSK INTENSITY VII & ABOVE. SEVERAL IMPORTANT CITIES LYING IN SEISMIC ZONE III, IV AND V ARE VULNERABLE TO EARTHQUAKES.

PRESENT DAY TECTONIC PLATES

The four known instrumentally recorded great (M *8.0 8.7) earthquakes in the foothills of the Himalaya in India, from west to east the 1905 Kangra, 1934 Bihar, 1897 Shillong and the 1950 Assam

SEISMIC ENERGY STRUCTURE E structure DEVICES E dissipated E shared Ground E seismic = E structure + E dissipated

OUR CODAL PROVISIONS ARE STILL PRESCRIPTIVE MANY BUILDING CODES ACCEPT 500 YEAR RETURN PERIOD FOR BUILDINGS AASHTO (2012) STIPULATES DESIGN BASIS AS A 975 YEAR RETURN PERIOD (5% POSSIBILITY OF EXCEEDANCE IN 50 YEARS) FIG. 26:

BASIC ISSUE: PREVENTION OF DISLODGEMENT (UNSEATING) TWO OPTIONS : -USE REACTION BLOCKS -SELECT INTEGRAL BRIDGES HELP!! MANDATORY REQUIREMENT : -PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUPPORT LENGTHS

OLD SURAJBARI BRIDGE

EXAMPLE OF LONGITUDINAL SEISMIC RESTRAINER FOR CONTINUOUS BRIDGES BLISTER BELOW SOFFIT OF SUPERSTRUCTURE LONGITUDINAL SEISMIC RESTRAINER BEARING FOR VERTICAL LOADS PEDESTAL

BRITANIA CHOWK FLYOVER ELEVATION OF RESTRAINED PIER

LONGITUDINAL TIE BARS HOLDING-DOWN BARS PREVENTION OF DISLODGEMENT

APPLIED FORCES ON PIER (t) : SLS ULS TRANSVERSE 130 162 LONGITUDINAL 120 172 CAPACITY OF SEISMIC RESTRAINERS (t) : TRANSVERSE NA 256 LONGITUDINAL NA 512 * BASIS : h = 0.126 SEISMIC REACTION BLOCKS: PERSPECTIVE VIEW

INTEGRAL BRIDGES SUB-STRUCTURE AND SUPERSTRUCTURE ARE MONOLITHIC ---NO BEARINGS!! ---FEW EXP JTS!!

SURAJBARI OLD BRIDGE METTALIC BEARINGS DESTROYED

PADSHAHI BAGH DISASTER REDUCTION FROM TERRORIST THREAT: HARDEN THE STRUCTURE PADSHAHI BAGH (J & K) : DAMAGED PIER CAP, BEARINGS & SUPERSTRUCTURE

PANCHSHEEL CLUB FLYOVER: INTEGRAL CONSTRUCTION, HIGH DURABILITY, LOW MAINTENANCE, INCREASED SAFETY DURING EARTHQUAKES

PANCHSHEEL CLUB FLYOVER: VIEW FROM SOFFIT

REDUCING SHARING 32

STU FORCE (ULTIMATE) = 650t EJ1 EXPANSION JOINT EJ2 RESTRAINED EXPANSION RESTRAINED STU STU JOINT STU STU EJ1 EXPANSION JOINT 510m 510m NHAI s GANGA BRIDGE AT ALLAHABAD SHOWING APPLICATION OF STUs.

NHAI s ALLAHABAD BRIDGE: APPLICATION OF STUs

35