MAC Calculus II Summer All you need to know on partial fractions and more

Similar documents
6.4 Dividing Polynomials: Long Division and Synthetic Division

HOW TO FACTOR. Next you reason that if it factors, then the factorization will look something like,

Relative Maxima and Minima sections 4.3

General Equilibrium. What happens to cause a reaction to come to equilibrium?

Some facts you should know that would be convenient when evaluating a limit:

Determination of the reaction order

CHAPTER P Preparation for Calculus

Chapter 2: Solution of First order ODE

Solving Right Triangles Using Trigonometry Examples

The Hanging Chain. John McCuan. January 19, 2006

Maximum Entropy and Exponential Families

LECTURE NOTES FOR , FALL 2004

Errata and changes for Lecture Note 1 (I would like to thank Tomasz Sulka for the following changes): ( ) ( ) lim = should be

KAMILLA OLIVER AND HELMUT PRODINGER

5.1 Composite Functions

Wavetech, LLC. Ultrafast Pulses and GVD. John O Hara Created: Dec. 6, 2013

The Laws of Acceleration

MATH 1220 Midterm 1 Thurs., Sept. 20, 2007

Mathematics II. Tutorial 5 Basic mathematical modelling. Groups: B03 & B08. Ngo Quoc Anh Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore

Chapter 15 Equilibrium. Reversible Reactions & Equilibrium. Reversible Reactions & Equilibrium. Reversible Reactions & Equilibrium 2/3/2014

Methods of evaluating tests

Chapter 15 Equilibrium. Reversible Reactions & Equilibrium. Reversible Reactions & Equilibrium. Reversible Reactions & Equilibrium 5/27/2014

Page 1. These are all fairly simple functions in that wherever the variable appears it is by itself. What about functions like the following, ( ) ( )

To work algebraically with exponential functions, we need to use the laws of exponents. You should

Ordered fields and the ultrafilter theorem

Chemistry (Physical chemistry) Lecture 10.

To derive the other Pythagorean Identities, divide the entire equation by + = θ = sin. sinθ cosθ tanθ = 1

Geometry of Transformations of Random Variables

23.1 Tuning controllers, in the large view Quoting from Section 16.7:

Intermediate Math Circles November 18, 2009 Solving Linear Diophantine Equations

Exercise 3: Quadratic sequences

A population of 50 flies is expected to double every week, leading to a function of the x

Chapter 26 Lecture Notes

MASSACHUSETTS MATHEMATICS LEAGUE CONTEST 3 DECEMBER 2013 ROUND 1 TRIG: RIGHT ANGLE PROBLEMS, LAWS OF SINES AND COSINES

Examining Applied Rational Functions

Differential Equations 8/24/2010

Chapter Review of of Random Processes

Lesson 23: The Defining Equation of a Line

MOLECULAR ORBITAL THEORY- PART I

Chapter 06: Analytic Trigonometry

Strauss PDEs 2e: Section Exercise 3 Page 1 of 13. u tt c 2 u xx = cos x. ( 2 t c 2 2 x)u = cos x. v = ( t c x )u

Hankel Optimal Model Order Reduction 1

Millennium Relativity Acceleration Composition. The Relativistic Relationship between Acceleration and Uniform Motion

Advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics AA215A Lecture 4

dy dy 2 dy d Y 2 dx dx Substituting these into the given differential equation d 2 Y dy 2Y = 2x + 3 ( ) ( 1 + 2b)= 3

arxiv:math/ v4 [math.ca] 29 Jul 2006

REFINED UPPER BOUNDS FOR THE LINEAR DIOPHANTINE PROBLEM OF FROBENIUS. 1. Introduction

Partial Fractions. June 27, In this section, we will learn to integrate another class of functions: the rational functions.

F = F x x + F y. y + F z

Velocity Addition in Space/Time David Barwacz 4/23/

Name Solutions to Test 1 September 23, 2016

Subject: Introduction to Component Matching and Off-Design Operation % % ( (1) R T % (

Modes are solutions, of Maxwell s equation applied to a specific device.

22.01 Fall 2015, Problem Set 6 (Normal Version Solutions)

Worksheet Week 7 Section

2. Properties of Functions

Appendix A Market-Power Model of Business Groups. Robert C. Feenstra Deng-Shing Huang Gary G. Hamilton Revised, November 2001

Math 2260 Exam #2 Solutions. Answer: The plan is to use integration by parts with u = 2x and dv = cos(3x) dx: dv = cos(3x) dx

Lecture 3 - Lorentz Transformations

Scholarship Calculus (93202) 2013 page 1 of 8. ( 6) ± 20 = 3± 5, so x = ln( 3± 5) 2. 1(a) Expression for dy = 0 [1st mark], [2nd mark], width is

( ) ( ) Volumetric Properties of Pure Fluids, part 4. The generic cubic equation of state:

RIEMANN S FIRST PROOF OF THE ANALYTIC CONTINUATION OF ζ(s) AND L(s, χ)

The above statement is the false product rule! The correct product rule gives g (x) = 3x 4 cos x+ 12x 3 sin x. for all angles θ.

After the completion of this section the student should recall

Theory. Coupled Rooms

CMSC 451: Lecture 9 Greedy Approximation: Set Cover Thursday, Sep 28, 2017

Product Policy in Markets with Word-of-Mouth Communication. Technical Appendix

max min z i i=1 x j k s.t. j=1 x j j:i T j

radical symbol 1 Use a Calculator to Find Square Roots 2 Find Side Lengths

Simple FIR Digital Filters. Simple FIR Digital Filters. Simple Digital Filters. Simple FIR Digital Filters. Simple FIR Digital Filters

EECS 120 Signals & Systems University of California, Berkeley: Fall 2005 Gastpar November 16, Solutions to Exam 2

INTEGRATING RADICALS

Computer Science 786S - Statistical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Data Analysis Page 1

Simplify each expression. 1. 6t + 13t 19t 2. 5g + 34g 39g 3. 7k - 15k 8k 4. 2b b 11b n 2-7n 2 3n x 2 - x 2 7x 2

Green s function for the wave equation

Get Solution of These Packages & Learn by Video Tutorials on SHORT REVISION

Most results in this section are stated without proof.

Math 151 Introduction to Eigenvectors

EDGE-DISJOINT CLIQUES IN GRAPHS WITH HIGH MINIMUM DEGREE

AP Calculus AB Summer Assignment

V. Interacting Particles

2. Factor and find all the zeros: b. p 6 + 7p 3 30 = Identify the domain: 4. Simplify:

Feedback D. Incorrect! Exponential functions are continuous everywhere. Look for features like square roots or denominators that could be made 0.

SERIJA III

MA2331 Tutorial Sheet 5, Solutions December 2014 (Due 12 December 2014 in class) F = xyi+ 1 2 x2 j+k = φ (1)

On Component Order Edge Reliability and the Existence of Uniformly Most Reliable Unicycles

SPLINE ESTIMATION OF SINGLE-INDEX MODELS

Special Relativity. Relativity

Tutorial 8: Solutions

Coding for Random Projections and Approximate Near Neighbor Search

REVISION SHEET FP2 (Edx) CALCULUS. x x 0.5. x x 1.5. π π. Standard Calculus of Inverse Trig and Hyperbolic Trig Functions = + = + arcsin x = +

1 sin 2 r = 1 n 2 sin 2 i

FINITE WORD LENGTH EFFECTS IN DSP

The shape of a hanging chain. a project in the calculus of variations

F = c where ^ı is a unit vector along the ray. The normal component is. Iν cos 2 θ. d dadt. dp normal (θ,φ) = dpcos θ = df ν

Conformal Mapping among Orthogonal, Symmetric, and Skew-Symmetric Matrices

PHYSICS 432/532: Cosmology Midterm Exam Solution Key (2018) 1. [40 points] Short answer (8 points each)

Generation of EM waves

Answer: Easiest way to determine equilibrium concentrations is to set up a table as follows: 2 SO 2 + O 2 2 SO 3 initial conc change

Transcription:

MC -75-Calulus II Summer 00 ll you need to know on partial frations and more What are partial frations? following forms:.... where, α are onstants. Partial frations are frations of one of the + α, ( + α n, where, α are onstants and n is a natural number (positive integer. If n =, we are bak at ase. + B + β + γ, where, B, β, γ are onstants and + β + γ is an irreduible quadrati polynomial. + B ( + β + γ n, where, B, β, γ are onstants, + β + γ is an irreduible quadrati polynomial and n is a natural number (positive integer. If n =, we are bak at ase. n irreduible quadrati polynomial is a polynomial + β + γ of degree whih does not fator into linear fators. s one an see, this is equivalent to the equation + β + γ = 0 having NO real roots. If one ompletes the square, an irreduible quadrati polynomial an always be rewritten in the form + β + γ = ( + b +. For eample: + + is irreduible; if we omplete the square we get + + = ( + +, so b = /, =. On the other hand, + + is not irreduible; ompleting the square leads to + + = ( + and annot be epressed in the form (with real. For eample, all of the following are partial frations: 5 7, + 9, 8 ( +, e π ( + 8, + = +, (5 + + = 5 ( + 5 +. 5 The interest, importane, of partial frations for alulus is due to two fats:

Fat. The fat that every quotient of polynomials in whih the degree of the numerator is < than the degree of the numerator an be deomposed (written as a sum of partial frations, in an essentially unique way. In other words, if f( = a m m + a m m + + a + a 0 b n n + b n n + + b + b 0 where m < n, then f( an be written as a sum of frations of type,,,. Don t worry about the essential uniqueness part; it simply means that two people doing the deomposition independently of eah other, will ome up with the same result, eept for some silly differenes, suh as the order of the terms. Fat. One knows (or an know how to integrate the partial frations. Integrating the partial frations. Memorizing the formulas preeded by an asterisk (* in parentheses may not be a terribly bad idea. Or, you should be able to get them fast from general priniples. I. Case From (* one gets d = ln + α + C + α d = ln + α + C + α II. Case ssume now n, the ase n = having been done. Sine (* ( + α n d = n ( + α n + C if n, it follows that ( + α n d = (n ( + α n + C for n =,,.... III. Case The following two formulas play a role here: (* and (* + α d = ln( + a + C + α d = ( α tan + C. α The first one follows from u du = ln u + C by the substitution u = + α, the seond one follows from (u + du = tan u + C by the substitution = αu. Using these formulas, here is how we integrate a partial fration + B + β + γ

We omplete the square in the denominator: + β + γ = ( + β + ( (γ β = + β + with = γ (β /. Don t memorize these formulas!, just omplete squares in eah individual ase. If by some hane γ is not stritly larger than b / then your quadrati polynomial wasn t irreduible. If β = 0, then the square is already ompleted and there is nothing to do. Our fration now looks like + B ( + b + with b = β/. This epression an be integrated quite easily by the substitution u = + b, so = u b, thanks to the formulas we mentioned above: + B (u b + B ( + b + d = u + d u + ( b + B = u + d u = u d + ( b + B + u + d = ln(u + + b + B ( tan u + C = ln(( + b + + b + B tan ( + b + C. Comments In the last epression, one does not need an absolute value inside the logarithm. The epression ( + b + only assumes positive values. Moreover, what is inside the logarithm is the original denominator; one ould re-epand and write ln( + β + γ instead of ln(( + b +. One an avoid (and perhaps should avoid the substitution if one an memorize a slightly more general version of the last two formulas that have been given an asterisk, namely (* + b ( + b + α d = ln[( + b + a ] + C and (* ( + b + α d = α tan ( + b α + C. We do two eamples, using these formulas in the first eample. Eample. Evaluate 5 + + + d. One feature of this eample is that the leading oeffiient in the denominator is not. There are several ways to deal with this; I would reommend just fatoring it out. We do this in the first step (first equality below, labelled (. In the seond step, step (, we omplete the square in the denominator. In step ( we adjust the numerator so we an use our formulas. If there is an +b squared in the denominator, and the numerator is of the form +B, just write = + b b; then + B = ( + b + ( b + B. In ( we separate

the integral into two to whih the formulas apply, and (5 has the final result. The numbers don t look pretty beause ontrary to what tetbooks do, we did not arrange things so everything works out very niely and looks beautiful. lot of things in real life are not pretty; one has to deal with them anyway. (5 + d = 5 + ( + + + + d = 5 + ( ( + + 79 d 5( + ( ( (5 = = 5 ( + + 79 d + ( + + 79 d 8 = 5 ln ( ( + + 79 79 tan ( + + 79 d ( + 79 + C. Eample. Evaluate 7 + 8 d. This is a muh simpler eample, beause the square in the denominator is already omplete. In fat, the first two starred formulas of ase apply. 7 + 8 d = 7 + d = + d 7 + d = ln( + 7 ( tan + C. IV. Case, n. We won t enounter this ase too many times in this ourse, at least not for n. However, it should be more or less lear that to deal with it we need to know how to evaluate the following two types of integrals: ( + a d, and n ( + a n d when n =,,.... The first one is easy; by the substitution u = + a one sees it works out to ( + a n d = (n ( + a + C. n The seond one an be transformed into a trigonometri integral whih an then be solved by the methods of Setion 7. of our tetbook, via the substitution = a tan θ. We only do one eample. Eample. Evaluate ( + d. We substitute = tan θ; then + = (tan θ + = se θ, d = se θ dθ. J. Stewart, Calulus, Early Transendentals, th. Ed., 999

We get ( + d = se θ dθ = os θ dθ. We an integrate os θ using the redution formula, or by os θ = ( + os θ dθ = θ + sin θ + C. Thus, so far, ( + d = (θ + os θ sin θ + C where we used that sin θ = sin θ os θ. We draw a triangle with an angle θ suh that tan θ = /. + θ From the triangle we see that os θ = / +, sin θ = / + so that ( + d = ( tan + ( + + C. This onludes the setion on how to integrate the individual partial frations. We turn to the general ase, how to integrate a funtion f( = P ( Q( where P, Q are polynomials and the degree of P is stritly less than the degree of Q. (If the degree of P is larger than or equal to the degree of Q, one first has to divide out P by Q, obtaining an epression G( + [R(/Q(], where G is a polynomial hene easy to integrate and the degree of R is now < the degree of Q. Step. Fator Q ompletely into distint powers of linear fators and/or of irreduible quadrati fators. This, of ourse, is easier said than done and in all the eerises you ll have to do Q will either be already fatored, or partially fatored, or fatorization will be quite easy. Step. Deompose into partial frations by writing out sums of terms (eah one a partial fration as follows. For eah power of a linear fator ( + a m appearing in Q, add the following terms to the sum: + a + ( + a + + m ( + a m. You don t have to use the symbols,..., m for the onstants, but the symbols you use for the onstants in every partial fration you write down should be different from those used in any other partial fration of the whole list. For 5

eample, if Q( has the fator ( + a (power only, you just add a single term + a. If a previous term already used the onstant, you have to use a different symbol. If Q( has the fator ( + a, you add + a + B ( + a + C ( + a. For every power ( + β + γ m of an irreduible quadrati fator, add the terms + B + β + γ + + B ( + β + γ + + m + B m ( + β + γ m. Step. In the sum of partial frations you now have a whole bunh of unknown onstants, eatly as many as the degree of Q. Take ommon denominator. The ommon denominator should be Q(, the numerator will be a (possibly horrendous polynomial involving all these onstants we alled,, B,...; of degree one less than the degree of Q. Collet equal powers of in the numerator and equate the oeffiient of eah power of with the orresponding oeffiient of P (. This will give you a system of linear equations, as many as there are unknown onstants, for these unknown onstants. Step. If instrutions were followed eatly, the theory states that the system of equations you found in step has one and only one solution. Find it by solving the system; obtaining the values of the unknown onstants,,.... This again, is easier said than done. Systems of up to four equations in four unknowns are relatively easy to solve. The time it takes to solve them inreases fast; systems of ten equations in ten unknowns should probably not be done without the aid of a omputer. It should also be mentioned that there is a slew of shortuts available to ompute these oeffiients, so that one basially never has to atually solve diretly the system of linear equations they satisfy. Final step 5. Now that you know all the onstants in the partial fration deomposition of f = P/Q, just integrate f by integrating term by term eah partial fration. We do one eample. Determine the partial fration deomposition of P ( Q( = + 7 + ( + + ( ( ( + + ( +. The denominator is partially fatored. + + is not irreduible, in fat it fators into ( +, hene ( + + fators as ( +. Neither is irreduible, it fators as ( ( +. To make a longish story short, we an keep on fatoring Q( getting Q( = ( + ( + ( ( ( + ( + + ( + = ( + ( + ( ( ( + ( + ( + + ( +. The polynomials + and + + are irreduible, so those fators stay as they are. But we are not done yet, we still have to ollet equal fators so that the omplete fatorization of Q is Q( = ( + ( ( + ( + ( + +.

We would now write, for the partial fration deomposition, + 7 + ( + + ( ( ( + + = ( + = + + B ( + + C ( + + D ( + + E ( + 5 + F ( + + G + H ( + J + + K + L + + M + N + + + P + Q ( + + + R + S ( + +. You might notie there are 7 unknown onstants, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, NP, Q, R, S. Not oinidentally, the degree of Q is also 7. We ompleted steps and above. To keep on going would be a bit razy, so we stop here. However, just in ase some of you happened to be urious on how the atual deomposition into partial frations looked, we used Maple to get it. nd here it is: + 7 + ( + + ( ( ( + + ( + = ( + 8 ( + 5 + ( + 5 ( + + 97 ( + 779 8 ( + + 78 ( + 9 08 ( + 80 05 ( + + + 7 80 + 07 + 7 + + + 5 + ( + + ( + + 7