Critical magnetic fields for the magnetic Dirac-Coulomb operator. Maria J. ESTEBAN. C.N.R.S. and University Paris-Dauphine

Similar documents
SELF-ADJOINTNESS OF DIRAC OPERATORS VIA HARDY-DIRAC INEQUALITIES

76 Griesemer, Lewis, Siedentop the Dirac operator in the gap with the number of negative eigenvalues of a corresponding Schrodinger operator (see [5])

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ap] 2 Jul 2006

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

EIGENFUNCTIONS OF DIRAC OPERATORS AT THE THRESHOLD ENERGIES

Applied Analysis (APPM 5440): Final exam 1:30pm 4:00pm, Dec. 14, Closed books.

Spectral Pollution and How to Avoid It (With Applications to Dirac and Periodic Schrödinger Operators)

Hilbert space methods for quantum mechanics. S. Richard

Mathematical Analysis of a Generalized Chiral Quark Soliton Model

Math Theory of Partial Differential Equations Lecture 3-2: Spectral properties of the Laplacian. Bessel functions.

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: WEAK AND WEAK* CONVERGENCE

HILBERT SPACES AND THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM. where the bar in the first equation denotes complex conjugation. In either case, for any x V define

Attempts at relativistic QM

here, this space is in fact infinite-dimensional, so t σ ess. Exercise Let T B(H) be a self-adjoint operator on an infinitedimensional

Molecular propagation through crossings and avoided crossings of electron energy levels

Controllability of linear PDEs (I): The wave equation

Symmetry breaking in Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities

Physics 107 Final Exam May 6, Your Name: 1. Questions

General Physics - E&M (PHY 1308) - Lecture Notes. General Physics - E&M (PHY 1308) Lecture Notes

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS

On Schrödinger equations with inverse-square singular potentials

Asymptotic distribution of eigenvalues of Laplace operator

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory

Perturbation Theory for Self-Adjoint Operators in Krein spaces

Rolle s Theorem for Polynomials of Degree Four in a Hilbert Space 1

Errata Applied Analysis

The Twisting Trick for Double Well Hamiltonians

Free energy estimates for the two-dimensional Keller-Segel model

The following definition is fundamental.

The Stellar Black Hole

1 Fourier Transformation.

YANG-MILLS GAUGE INVARIANT THEORY FOR SPACE CURVED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD. Algirdas Antano Maknickas 1. September 3, 2014

I teach myself... Hilbert spaces

Analysis Preliminary Exam Workshop: Hilbert Spaces

AN EFFECTIVE METRIC ON C(H, K) WITH NORMAL STRUCTURE. Mona Nabiei (Received 23 June, 2015)

A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis

2.3 Variational form of boundary value problems

HOMEOMORPHISMS AND FREDHOLM THEORY FOR PERTURBATIONS OF NONLINEAR FREDHOLM MAPS OF INDEX ZERO WITH APPLICATIONS

ψ s a ˆn a s b ˆn b ψ Hint: Because the state is spherically symmetric the answer can depend only on the angle between the two directions.

Spectral asymptotics of Pauli operators and orthogonal polynomials in complex domains

Problem Set 5 Solutions

Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015)

Eigenvalues of Robin Laplacians on infinite sectors and application to polygons

Anderson Localization on the Sierpinski Gasket

Vector and Scalar Potentials

Nonlinear stabilization via a linear observability

Arguments Supporting Model of Three-Positron Structure of the Proton

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Stabilization of persistently excited linear systems

Rapidly Rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates in Strongly Anharmonic Traps. Michele Correggi. T. Rindler-Daller, J. Yngvason math-ph/

UNBOUNDED OPERATORS ON HILBERT SPACES. Let X and Y be normed linear spaces, and suppose A : X Y is a linear map.

Commutative Banach algebras 79

Compact operators on Banach spaces

THE DIRAC EQUATION (A REVIEW) We will try to find the relativistic wave equation for a particle.

ACCUMULATION OF DISCRETE EIGENVALUES OF THE RADIAL DIRAC OPERATOR

G : Quantum Mechanics II

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR SYMMETRIC OPERATORS WITH COMPACT RESOLVENT

SPECTRAL THEORY EVAN JENKINS

5 Compact linear operators

Continuous Functions on Metric Spaces

Filters in Analysis and Topology

NONINTEGER FLUXES, DOLBEAULT COMPLEXES, AND SUPERSYMMETRIC QUANTUM MECHANICS. based on [ ] and [ ] Hannover, August 1, 2011

Maxwell s equations in Carnot groups

TD 1: Hilbert Spaces and Applications

A note on adiabatic theorem for Markov chains and adiabatic quantum computation. Yevgeniy Kovchegov Oregon State University

Lecture 19: Building Atoms and Molecules

Scott Hughes 12 May Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics Spring 2005

Functional Analysis Review

Hilbert Space Methods Used in a First Course in Quantum Mechanics A Recap WHY ARE WE HERE? QUOTE FROM WIKIPEDIA

Renormalization according to Wilson

The Riemann Hypothesis Project summary

Lecture 19: Building Atoms and Molecules

Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Non-relativistic Limit of Dirac Equations in Gravitational Field and Quantum Effects of Gravity

16 1 Basic Facts from Functional Analysis and Banach Lattices

Self-adjoint extensions of symmetric operators

Application of the ECE Lemma to the fermion and electromagnetic fields

Ground State Patterns of Spin-1 Bose-Einstein condensation via Γ-convergence Theory

MATH MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS. Contents

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO ASYMPTOTICALLY PERIODIC SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS

Wave function methods for the electronic Schrödinger equation

Stability of Relativistic Matter with Magnetic Fields for Nuclear Charges up to the Critical Value

Spectral analysis of two doubly infinite Jacobi operators

SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF JACOBI MATRICES OF CERTAIN BIRTH AND DEATH PROCESSES

Stabilization of Distributed Parameter Systems by State Feedback with Positivity Constraints

Prove that this gives a bounded linear operator T : X l 1. (6p) Prove that T is a bounded linear operator T : l l and compute (5p)

BASIC FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem

Compact symetric bilinear forms

are Banach algebras. f(x)g(x) max Example 7.4. Similarly, A = L and A = l with the pointwise multiplication

Quasi-conformal maps and Beltrami equation

4 Linear operators and linear functionals

Compression, Matrix Range and Completely Positive Map

SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF THE LAPLACIAN ON BOUNDED DOMAINS

Lecture 5. Theorems of Alternatives and Self-Dual Embedding

Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics With Applications to Schrödinger Operators 2nd edition

Lecture 4 - Relativistic wave equations. Relativistic wave equations must satisfy several general postulates. These are;

Transcription:

Critical magnetic fields for the magnetic Dirac-Coulomb operator Maria J. ESTEBAN C.N.R.S. and University Paris-Dauphine In collaboration with : Jean Dolbeault and Michael Loss http://www.ceremade.dauphine.fr/ e esteban/ John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.1/20

Physical problem Very strong magnetic fields could : destabilize matter, distorting atoms and molecules and forming polymer-like chains, facilitate the massive spontaneous appearance of positron-electron pairs, John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.2/20

Physical problem Very strong magnetic fields could : destabilize matter, distorting atoms and molecules and forming polymer-like chains, facilitate the massive spontaneous appearance of positron-electron pairs, the best candidate for this to happen are the magnetars (neutron stars), in which huge gravitational collapses would facilitate the appearance of huge magnetic fields, magnetars appear today as the most possible hypothesis for the so called gamma ray outbursts" John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.2/20

Physical problem Very strong magnetic fields could : destabilize matter, distorting atoms and molecules and forming polymer-like chains, facilitate the massive spontaneous appearance of positron-electron pairs, the best candidate for this to happen are the magnetars (neutron stars), in which huge gravitational collapses would facilitate the appearance of huge magnetic fields, magnetars appear today as the most possible hypothesis for the so called gamma ray outbursts" Earth s magnetic field = 1 Gauss Maximal field on Earth (MRI) = 1 Tesla = 10 4 Gauss Deatly field strength = 10 5 Tesla = 10 9 Gauss In new magnetars one expectes fields of 10 11 Tesla. In recent theories, up to 10 16 Tesla in the heart of the magnetars. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.2/20

How to find models sustaining those huge magnetic fields? relativistic electronic models (Dirac) with homogeneous magnetic fields and abnomal magnetic moments (V. Canuto, H.-Y. Chiu; R.F. O Connell), hydrogenic atoms in a curved universe (Nowotny), intense electrostatic fields... (..., Brodsky, Mohr,...), heterogeneous magnetic fields (P. Achuthan et al), Excellent presentation in the works of R.C. Duncan and C. Thompson. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.3/20

How to find models sustaining those huge magnetic fields? relativistic electronic models (Dirac) with homogeneous magnetic fields and abnomal magnetic moments (V. Canuto, H.-Y. Chiu; R.F. O Connell), hydrogenic atoms in a curved universe (Nowotny), intense electrostatic fields... (..., Brodsky, Mohr,...), heterogeneous magnetic fields (P. Achuthan et al), Excellent presentation in the works of R.C. Duncan and C. Thompson. Electrons submitted to an external electromagnetic field with homogeneous magnetic field. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.3/20

How to find models sustaining those huge magnetic fields? relativistic electronic models (Dirac) with homogeneous magnetic fields and abnomal magnetic moments (V. Canuto, H.-Y. Chiu; R.F. O Connell), hydrogenic atoms in a curved universe (Nowotny), intense electrostatic fields... (..., Brodsky, Mohr,...), heterogeneous magnetic fields (P. Achuthan et al), Excellent presentation in the works of R.C. Duncan and C. Thompson. Electrons submitted to an external electromagnetic field with homogeneous magnetic field. REMARK. Same problem but very different situation in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (with the Schrödinger and the Pauli operators). John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.3/20

The free Dirac operator H = i α + β, α 1, α 2, α 3, β M 4 4 (CI) (c = m = = 1) John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.4/20

The free Dirac operator H = i α + β, α 1, α 2, α 3, β M 4 4 (CI) (c = m = = 1)! β = I 0 0 I, α k = 0 σ k σ k 0! (k = 1,2,3) John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.4/20

The free Dirac operator H = i α + β, α 1, α 2, α 3, β M 4 4 (CI) (c = m = = 1)! β = I 0 0 I, α k = 0 σ k σ k 0! (k = 1,2,3)! σ 1 = 0 1 1 0!, σ 2 = 0 i i 0!, σ 3 = 1 0 0 1 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.4/20

The free Dirac operator H = i α + β, α 1, α 2, α 3, β M 4 4 (CI) (c = m = = 1)! β = I 0 0 I, α k = 0 σ k σ k 0! (k = 1,2,3)! σ 1 = 0 1 1 0!, σ 2 = 0 i i 0!, σ 3 = 1 0 0 1 The two main properties of H are: H 2 = + I 1, σ(h) = (, 1] [1,+ ) John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.4/20

The free Dirac operator H = i α + β, α 1, α 2, α 3, β M 4 4 (CI) (c = m = = 1)! β = I 0 0 I, α k = 0 σ k σ k 0! (k = 1,2,3)! σ 1 = 0 1 1 0!, σ 2 = 0 i i 0!, σ 3 = 1 0 0 1 The two main properties of H are: H 2 = + I 1, σ(h) = (, 1] [1,+ ) REMARK. H acts on functions ψ : IR 3 CI 4 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.4/20

The free Dirac operator H = i α + β, α 1, α 2, α 3, β M 4 4 (CI) (c = m = = 1)! β = I 0 0 I, α k = 0 σ k σ k 0! (k = 1,2,3)! σ 1 = 0 1 1 0!, σ 2 = 0 i i 0!, σ 3 = 1 0 0 1 The two main properties of H are: H 2 = + I 1, σ(h) = (, 1] [1,+ ) REMARK. H acts on functions ψ : IR 3 CI 4 QUESTION : Spectrum of H + V? John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.4/20

Eigenvalues of the Dirac operator without magnetic field Let us first consider the case of Coulomb potentials V ν := ν x, ν > 0. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.5/20

Eigenvalues of the Dirac operator without magnetic field Let us first consider the case of Coulomb potentials V ν := ν x, ν > 0. H ν := H 0 ν x can be defined as a self-adjoint operator if 0 < ν < 1 (actually also (recent result) if ν = 1). John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.5/20

Eigenvalues of the Dirac operator without magnetic field Let us first consider the case of Coulomb potentials V ν := ν x, ν > 0. H ν := H 0 ν x can be defined as a self-adjoint operator if 0 < ν < 1 (actually also (recent result) if ν = 1). Its spectrum is given by: σ(h ν ) = (, 1] {λ ν 1, λ ν 2,... } [1, ) 0 < λ ν 1 = p 1 ν 2 λ ν k < 1. and the fact that λ 1 (H + V ν ) belongs to ( 1,1) is a kind of stability condition" for the electron. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.5/20

Magnetic case I When a external magnetic field B is present, one considers a magnetic potential A B s. t. curla B = B. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.6/20

Magnetic case I When a external magnetic field B is present, one considers a magnetic potential A B s. t. curla B = B. One has then to replace with B = ia B John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.6/20

Magnetic case I When a external magnetic field B is present, one considers a magnetic potential A B s. t. curla B = B. One has then to replace with B = ia B H B = i α B + β John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.6/20

Magnetic case I When a external magnetic field B is present, one considers a magnetic potential A B s. t. curla B = B. One has then to replace with B = ia B H B = i α B + β If we consider H B + V, if this operator is self-adjoint, if its essential spectrum is the set (, 1] [1,+ ) plus a discrete number of eigenvalues in the spectral gap ( 1, 1), John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.6/20

Magnetic case I When a external magnetic field B is present, one considers a magnetic potential A B s. t. curla B = B. One has then to replace with B = ia B H B = i α B + β If we consider H B + V, if this operator is self-adjoint, if its essential spectrum is the set (, 1] [1,+ ) plus a discrete number of eigenvalues in the spectral gap ( 1, 1), Does λ 1 (B, V ) ever leave the spectral gap ( 1,1)? and if yes, for which values of B? John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.6/20

Eigenvalues below / in the middle of the continuous spectrum. Spectrum of a self-adjoint operator A : John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.7/20

Eigenvalues below / in the middle of the continuous spectrum. Spectrum of a self-adjoint operator A : In the first case, λ 1 = min x 0 (Ax, x) x 2 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.7/20

Eigenvalues below / in the middle of the continuous spectrum. Spectrum of a self-adjoint operator A : In the first case, λ 1 = min x 0 (Ax, x) x 2 In the second case, λ 1 = min max?? (Ax, x) x 2, λ 1 = max? min? (Ax, x) x 2,... John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.7/20

Abstract min-max theorem (Dolbeault, E., Séré, 2000) Let H be a Hilbert space and A : F = D(A) H H a self-adjoint operator defined on H. Let H +, H be two orthogonal subspaces of H satisfying: H = H + H. Define F ± := P ± F. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.8/20

Abstract min-max theorem (Dolbeault, E., Séré, 2000) Let H be a Hilbert space and A : F = D(A) H H a self-adjoint operator defined on H. Let H +, H be two orthogonal subspaces of H satisfying: H = H + H. Define F ± := P ± F. (i) a := sup x F \{0} (x, Ax ) x 2 H < +. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.8/20

Abstract min-max theorem (Dolbeault, E., Séré, 2000) Let H be a Hilbert space and A : F = D(A) H H a self-adjoint operator defined on H. Let H +, H be two orthogonal subspaces of H satisfying: H = H + H. Define F ± := P ± F. (i) a := sup x F \{0} (x, Ax ) x 2 H < +. Let c k = inf V subspace of F + dim V =k sup x (V F )\{0} (x, Ax) x 2 H, k 1. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.8/20

Abstract min-max theorem (Dolbeault, E., Séré, 2000) Let H be a Hilbert space and A : F = D(A) H H a self-adjoint operator defined on H. Let H +, H be two orthogonal subspaces of H satisfying: H = H + H. Define F ± := P ± F. (i) a := sup x F \{0} (x, Ax ) x 2 H < +. Let c k = inf V subspace of F + dim V =k sup x (V F )\{0} (x, Ax) x 2 H, k 1. If (ii) c 1 > a, then c k is the k-th eigenvalue of A in the interval (a, b), where b = inf (σ ess (A) (a,+ )). John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.8/20

Application to magnetic Dirac operators I ψ : IR 3 C 4, ψ = «ϕ χ = ϕ 0 + «0 χ, ϕ, χ : IR 3 CI 2 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.9/20

Application to magnetic Dirac operators I ψ : IR 3 C 4, ψ = «ϕ χ = ϕ 0 + «0 χ, ϕ, χ : IR 3 CI 2 Suppose that V satisfies lim V (x) = 0, x + ν x V 0, John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.9/20

Application to magnetic Dirac operators I «ϕ ϕ «0 ψ : IR 3 C 4, ψ = = + χ 0 χ, ϕ, χ : IR 3 CI 2 Suppose that V satisfies lim V (x) = 0, x + ν x V 0, Then, for all k 1, λ k (B, V ) = inf Y subspace of C o (IR3,CI 2 ) dimy =k sup ϕ Y \{0} sup ψ= ϕ χ χ C 0 (IR3,C 2 ) (ψ,(h B + V )ψ) (ψ, ψ) John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.9/20

Application to magnetic Dirac operators II The first eigenvalue of H B + V in the spectral hole ( 1,1) is given by λ 1 (B, V ) := inf sup ϕ 0 χ (ψ, (H B + V )ψ) (ψ, ψ), ψ = «ϕ χ John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.10/20

Application to magnetic Dirac operators II The first eigenvalue of H B + V in the spectral hole ( 1,1) is given by λ 1 (B, V ) := inf sup ϕ 0 χ (ψ, (H B + V )ψ) (ψ, ψ), ψ = «ϕ χ and λ B (ϕ) := sup ψ= ϕ χ (ψ, (H B + V )ψ) (ψ, ψ) χ C 0 (IR3,C 2 ) John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.10/20

Application to magnetic Dirac operators II The first eigenvalue of H B + V in the spectral hole ( 1,1) is given by λ 1 (B, V ) := inf sup ϕ 0 χ (ψ, (H B + V )ψ) (ψ, ψ), ψ = «ϕ χ and λ B (ϕ) := sup ψ= ϕ χ (ψ, (H B + V )ψ) (ψ, ψ) χ C 0 (IR3,C 2 ) is the unique real number λ such that σ B ϕ 2 IR 3 1 V + λ + (1 + V ) ϕ 2 dx = λ ϕ 2 dx. IR 3 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.10/20

Application to magnetic Dirac operators III λ 1 (B, V ) = inf ϕ C 0 (IR3,C 2 ) ϕ 0 λ B (ϕ) John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.11/20

Application to magnetic Dirac operators III λ 1 (B, V ) = inf ϕ C 0 (IR3,C 2 ) ϕ 0 λ B (ϕ) σ B ϕ 2 IR 3 1 V + λ B (ϕ) + (V + 1 λb (ϕ)) ϕ 2 dx = 0 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.11/20

Application to magnetic Dirac operators III λ 1 (B, V ) = inf ϕ C 0 (IR3,C 2 ) ϕ 0 λ B (ϕ) σ B ϕ 2 IR 3 1 V + λ B (ϕ) + (V + 1 λb (ϕ)) ϕ 2 dx = 0 IR3 (σ B )ϕ 2 1 + λ 1 (B, V ν ) + ν x dx + (1 λ 1 (B, V ν )) ϕ 2 dx IR 3 IR 3 ν x ϕ 2 dx John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.11/20

Application to magnetic Dirac operators III λ 1 (B, V ) = inf ϕ C 0 (IR3,C 2 ) ϕ 0 λ B (ϕ) σ B ϕ 2 IR 3 1 V + λ B (ϕ) + (V + 1 λb (ϕ)) ϕ 2 dx = 0 IR3 (σ B )ϕ 2 1 + λ 1 (B, V ν ) + ν x dx + (1 λ 1 (B, V ν )) ϕ 2 dx IR 3 IR 3 ν x ϕ 2 dx QUESTIONS : When do we have λ 1 (B, V ) ( 1,1)? If the eigenvalue λ 1 (B, V ) leaves the interval ( 1,1), when? John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.11/20

For a potential V = V ν, ν (0,1), 0 < B1 < B2 < B(ν) : B=0-1 1 B=B1 B=B2 B=B(ν) -1 1 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.12/20

For a potential V = V ν, ν (0,1), 0 < B1 < B2 < B(ν) : B=0-1 1 B=B1 B=B2 B=B(ν) -1 1 DEFINITION: B(ν) := inf B > 0 : liminf bրb λ 1 (B, ν) = 1. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.12/20

For a potential V = V ν, ν (0,1), 0 < B1 < B2 < B(ν) : B=0-1 1 B=B1 B=B2 B=B(ν) -1 1 DEFINITION: B(ν) := inf B > 0 : liminf bրb λ 1 (B, ν) = 1. TOOL TO ESTIMATE IT : IR3 (σ B )ϕ 2 1 + λ 1 (B, V ) V dx + (1 λ 1(B, V )) ϕ 2 dx IR 3 IR 3 V ϕ 2 dx John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.12/20

First results to estimate λ 1 (B,V ) For a given C, we have λ 1 (B, V ) < C if we can find a function ϕ s. t. ( ) IR3 (σ B ) ϕ 2 1 + C V dx + (1 C) ϕ 2 dx + IR 3 V ϕ 2 dx < 0 IR 3 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.13/20

First results to estimate λ 1 (B,V ) For a given C, we have λ 1 (B, V ) < C if we can find a function ϕ s. t. ( ) IR3 (σ B ) ϕ 2 1 + C V dx + (1 C) ϕ 2 dx + IR 3 V ϕ 2 dx < 0 IR 3 And to verify that λ 1 (B, V ) > C it is enough to prove that for all ϕ ( ) IR3 (σ B )ϕ 2 1 + C V dx + (1 C) ϕ 2 dx + V ϕ 2 dx > 0 IR 3 IR 3 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.13/20

First results to estimate λ 1 (B,V ) For a given C, we have λ 1 (B, V ) < C if we can find a function ϕ s. t. ( ) IR3 (σ B ) ϕ 2 1 + C V dx + (1 C) ϕ 2 dx + IR 3 V ϕ 2 dx < 0 IR 3 And to verify that λ 1 (B, V ) > C it is enough to prove that for all ϕ ( ) IR3 (σ B )ϕ 2 1 + C V dx + (1 C) ϕ 2 dx + V ϕ 2 dx > 0 IR 3 IR 3 and of course we are intersted in the case C = 1 in (*), and C = 1 in (**). John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.13/20

Some results (with J. Dolbeault and M. Loss) V ν = ν x, A B(x) := B 2 0 @ x 1 2 x 1 A, B(x) := 0 0 1 @ 0 0A ; ν (0,1), B 0 B John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.14/20

Some results (with J. Dolbeault and M. Loss) V ν = ν x, A B(x) := B 2 0 @ x 1 2 x 1 A, B(x) := 0 0 1 @ 0 0A ; ν (0,1), B 0 B For B = 0, λ 1 (0, V ν ) = 1 ν 2 ( 1,1) John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.14/20

Some results (with J. Dolbeault and M. Loss) V ν = ν x, A B(x) := B 2 0 @ x 1 2 x 1 A, B(x) := 0 0 1 @ 0 0A ; ν (0,1), B 0 B For B = 0, λ 1 (0, V ν ) = 1 ν 2 ( 1,1) For all B 0, λ 1 (B, V ν ) < 1 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.14/20

Some results (with J. Dolbeault and M. Loss) V ν = ν x, A B(x) := B 2 0 @ x 1 2 x 1 A, B(x) := 0 0 1 @ 0 0A ; ν (0,1), B 0 B For B = 0, λ 1 (0, V ν ) = 1 ν 2 ( 1,1) For all B 0, λ 1 (B, V ν ) < 1 For all ν (0,1) there exists a critical field strength B(ν) such that λ 1 (B, V ν ) 1 if B B(ν) John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.14/20

Some results (with J. Dolbeault and M. Loss) V ν = ν x, A B(x) := B 2 0 @ x 1 2 x 1 A, B(x) := 0 0 1 @ 0 0A ; ν (0,1), B 0 B For B = 0, λ 1 (0, V ν ) = 1 ν 2 ( 1,1) For all B 0, λ 1 (B, V ν ) < 1 For all ν (0,1) there exists a critical field strength B(ν) such that λ 1 (B, V ν ) 1 if B B(ν) lim ν 1 B(ν) > 0, lim ν 0 ν log B(ν) = π John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.14/20

Some results (with J. Dolbeault and M. Loss) V ν = ν x, A B(x) := B 2 0 @ x 1 2 x 1 A, B(x) := 0 0 1 @ 0 0A ; ν (0,1), B 0 B For B = 0, λ 1 (0, V ν ) = 1 ν 2 ( 1,1) For all B 0, λ 1 (B, V ν ) < 1 For all ν (0,1) there exists a critical field strength B(ν) such that λ 1 (B, V ν ) 1 if B B(ν) lim ν 1 B(ν) > 0, lim ν 0 ν log B(ν) = π For ν small, the asymptotics of B(ν) can be calculated by an approximation in the first relativistic Landau level". John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.14/20

A better method to determine B(ν) IR3 (σ B )ϕ 2 1 + λ 1 (B, V ν ) + ν x dx + (1 λ 1 (B, V ν )) ϕ 2 dx IR 3 IR 3 ν x ϕ 2 dx John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.15/20

A better method to determine B(ν) IR3 (σ B )ϕ 2 1 + λ 1 (B, V ν ) + ν x dx + (1 λ 1 (B, V ν )) ϕ 2 dx IR 3 IR 3 ν x ϕ 2 dx and we are looking for B n B(ν) such that λ 1 (B n, ν) 1. If everything were compact, we would be able to pass to the limit and obtain IR3 x (σ B )ϕ 2 ν ν IR 3 x ϕ 2 dx + 2 ϕ 2 dx 0 IR 3 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.15/20

A better method to determine B(ν) IR3 (σ B )ϕ 2 1 + λ 1 (B, V ν ) + ν x dx + (1 λ 1 (B, V ν )) ϕ 2 dx IR 3 IR 3 ν x ϕ 2 dx and we are looking for B n B(ν) such that λ 1 (B n, ν) 1. If everything were compact, we would be able to pass to the limit and obtain IR3 x (σ B )ϕ 2 ν ν IR 3 x ϕ 2 dx + 2 ϕ 2 dx 0 IR 3 Now define the functional E B,ν [φ] := IR 3 x ν (σ B) φ 2 dx IR 3 ν x φ 2 dx, If everything were compact and nice", µ B,ν + 2 = 0 ; µ B,ν := inf j E B,ν [φ]; ff ϕ 2 dx = 1. IR 3 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.15/20

If everything were compact and nice", µ B,ν + 2 = 0 ; µ B,ν := inf j E B,ν [φ]; ff ϕ 2 dx = 1. IR 3 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.16/20

If everything were compact and nice", µ B,ν + 2 = 0 ; µ B,ν := inf j E B,ν [φ]; ff ϕ 2 dx = 1. IR 3 A very nice property is that the scaling φ B := B 3/4 φ `B 1/2 x preserves the L 2 norm and E B,ν [φ B ] = B E 1,ν [φ]. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.16/20

If everything were compact and nice", µ B,ν + 2 = 0 ; µ B,ν := inf j E B,ν [φ]; ff ϕ 2 dx = 1. IR 3 A very nice property is that the scaling φ B := B 3/4 φ `B 1/2 x preserves the L 2 norm and E B,ν [φ B ] = B E 1,ν [φ]. So, if we define µ(ν) := inf 0 φ C 0 (IR 3 ) we have µ B,ν = B µ(ν). E 1,ν [φ] φ 2 L 2 (R 3 ), THM : p B(ν) µ(ν) + 2 = 0 which is equivalent to B(ν) = 4 µ(ν) 2. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.16/20

If everything were compact and nice", µ B,ν + 2 = 0 ; µ B,ν := inf j E B,ν [φ]; ff ϕ 2 dx = 1. IR 3 A very nice property is that the scaling φ B := B 3/4 φ `B 1/2 x preserves the L 2 norm and E B,ν [φ B ] = B E 1,ν [φ]. So, if we define µ(ν) := inf 0 φ C 0 (IR 3 ) we have µ B,ν = B µ(ν). E 1,ν [φ] φ 2 L 2 (R 3 ), THM : p B(ν) µ(ν) + 2 = 0 which is equivalent to B(ν) = 4 µ(ν) 2. PROPOSITION. On the interval (0, 1), the function ν µ(ν) is continuous, monotone decreasing and takes only negative real values. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.16/20

If everything were compact and nice", µ B,ν + 2 = 0 ; µ B,ν := inf j E B,ν [φ]; ff ϕ 2 dx = 1. IR 3 A very nice property is that the scaling φ B := B 3/4 φ `B 1/2 x preserves the L 2 norm and E B,ν [φ B ] = B E 1,ν [φ]. So, if we define µ(ν) := inf 0 φ C 0 (IR 3 ) we have µ B,ν = B µ(ν). E 1,ν [φ] φ 2 L 2 (R 3 ), THM : p B(ν) µ(ν) + 2 = 0 which is equivalent to B(ν) = 4 µ(ν) 2. PROPOSITION. On the interval (0, 1), the function ν µ(ν) is continuous, monotone decreasing and takes only negative real values. Hence, B(ν) = 4 µ(ν) 2 implies that ν B(ν) is decreasing. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.16/20

If everything were compact and nice", µ B,ν + 2 = 0 ; µ B,ν := inf j E B,ν [φ]; ff ϕ 2 dx = 1. IR 3 A very nice property is that the scaling φ B := B 3/4 φ `B 1/2 x preserves the L 2 norm and E B,ν [φ B ] = B E 1,ν [φ]. So, if we define µ(ν) := inf 0 φ C 0 (IR 3 ) we have µ B,ν = B µ(ν). E 1,ν [φ] φ 2 L 2 (R 3 ), THM : p B(ν) µ(ν) + 2 = 0 which is equivalent to B(ν) = 4 µ(ν) 2. PROPOSITION. On the interval (0, 1), the function ν µ(ν) is continuous, monotone decreasing and takes only negative real values. Hence, B(ν) = 4 µ(ν) 2 implies that ν B(ν) is decreasing. Now we would like to estimate B(ν). This can be done analytically or/and numerically. As we said before, analytically we have some estimates for ν close to 0 and to 1. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.16/20

The Landau level approximation Consider the class of functions A(B, ν) : φ l := B 2 π 2 l l! (x 2 + i x 1 ) l e B s2 /4 1, l N, s 2 = x 2 1 + x 2 2, 0 where the coefficients depend only on x 3, i.e., φ(x) = X l f l (x 3 ) φ l (x 1, x 2 ), z := x 3. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.17/20

The Landau level approximation Consider the class of functions A(B, ν) : φ l := B 2 π 2 l l! (x 2 + i x 1 ) l e B s2 /4 1, l N, s 2 = x 2 1 + x 2 2, 0 where the coefficients depend only on x 3, i.e., φ(x) = X l f l (x 3 ) φ l (x 1, x 2 ), z := x 3. Now, we shall restrict the functional E B,ν to the first Landau level. In this framework, that we shall call the Landau level ansatz, we also define a critical field by B L (ν) := inf j ff B > 0 : liminf bրb λl 1 (b, ν) = 1, where λ L 1 (b, ν) := inf λ[φ, b, ν]. φ A(B,ν), Π φ=0 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.17/20

THEOREM : B L (ν) = 4 µ L (ν) 2, where µ L (ν) := inf f L ν [f] f 2 L 2 (R + ) < 0. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.18/20

THEOREM : B L (ν) = 4 µ L (ν) 2, where µ L (ν) := inf f L ν [f] f 2 L 2 (R + ) < 0. L ν [f] = E 1,ν [φ f ], φ f (x) = f(z) e s2 /4 1. 2 π 0 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.18/20

THEOREM : B L (ν) = 4 µ L (ν) 2, where µ L (ν) := inf f L ν [f] f 2 L 2 (R + ) < 0. L ν [f] = E 1,ν [φ f ], φ f (x) = f(z) e s2 /4 1. 2 π 0 L ν [f] = 1 ν 0 b(z) f 2 dz ν 0 a(z) f 2 dz b(z) = 0 p s 2 + z 2 s e s2 /2 ds and a(z) = 0 s e s2 /2 s 2 + z 2 ds. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.18/20

THEOREM : B L (ν) = 4 µ L (ν) 2, where µ L (ν) := inf f L ν [f] f 2 L 2 (R + ) < 0. L ν [f] = E 1,ν [φ f ], φ f (x) = f(z) e s2 /4 1. 2 π 0 L ν [f] = 1 ν 0 b(z) f 2 dz ν 0 a(z) f 2 dz b(z) = 0 p s 2 + z 2 s e s2 /2 ds and a(z) = 0 s e s2 /2 s 2 + z 2 ds. COROLLARY. µ(ν) µ L (ν) < 0 = B(ν) B L (ν). John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.18/20

Final results THEOREM. For ν (0, ν 0 ), B L (ν + ν 3/2 ) B(ν) B L (ν) John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.19/20

Final results THEOREM. For ν (0, ν 0 ), B L (ν + ν 3/2 ) B(ν) B L (ν) THEOREM. lim ν log B L (ν) = π. ν 0 COROLLARY. lim ν log B(ν) = π. ν 0 John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.19/20

Final results THEOREM. For ν (0, ν 0 ), B L (ν + ν 3/2 ) B(ν) B L (ν) THEOREM. lim ν log B L (ν) = π. ν 0 COROLLARY. lim ν log B(ν) = π. ν 0 B B(ν) B L (ν) 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 300 250 200 150 100 50 ν John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.19/20

Final results THEOREM. For ν (0, ν 0 ), B L (ν + ν 3/2 ) B(ν) B L (ν) THEOREM. lim ν log B L (ν) = π. ν 0 COROLLARY. lim ν log B(ν) = π. ν 0 B B(ν) B L (ν) 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 300 250 200 150 100 50 ν NUMERICAL OBSERVATION. For ν near 1, B(ν) is below B L (ν) by 30%. John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.19/20

Dear John : even if late, John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.20/20

Dear John : even if late, BON ANNIVERSAIRE! HAPPY BIRTHDAY! John60, Edinburgh, June 2008 p.20/20