In situ measurements of photosynthetic irradiance responses of two Red Sea sponges growing under dim light conditions

Similar documents
Photosymbiosis in Intertidal and Subtidal Tropical Sponges

Aquatic Ancestors of Land Plants

Ian Hawes a,, Donna Sutherland b, Dieter Hanelt c

Phytoplankton Photosynthesis

Diurnal and bathymetric changes in chlorophyll fluorescence yields of reef corals measured in situ with a fast repetition rate fluorometer

Variable Fluorescence 4/13/10. Fluorescence HEAT

CORAL PHOTOBIOLOGY STUDIED WITH A NEW IMAGING PULSE AMPLITUDE MODULATED FLUOROMETER 1. Peter J. Ralph 2. Ulrich Schreiber. Rolf Gademann.

Photosynthetic rapid light curves (RLC) of Thalassia testudinum exhibit diurnal variation

CORAL REEFS IN HOT WATER

In situ underwater measurements of photosynthetic activity of coral zooxanthellae and other reef-dwelling dinoflagellate endosymbionts

Table S1. Shimakawa et al.

Name: Period: Date: Photosynthesis Practice Questions

Next-generation Imaging Flow Cytometry

PHOTOSYNTHESIS Student Packet SUMMARY

SAM Teachers Guide Photosynthesis

Intra-colonial variability in light acclimation of zooxanthellae in coral tissues of Pocillopora damicornis

Phytoplankton Photosynthesis

Name Date Class. This section explains how plants make food by using the energy from sunlight.

Among-shoot variability and leaf-specific absorptance characteristics affect diel estimates of in situ electron transport of Posidonia australis

Microsensor studies of photosynthesis and respiration in the symbiotic foraminifer Orbulina universa

AP Biology. Warm-up. Photosynthesis: Life from Light and Air. Energy needs of life. Energy needs of life. Objective: Warm-up:

4.1. Photosynthesis Light-Dependent Reactions

EBS 566/666 Lecture 8: (i) Energy flow, (ii) food webs

Q1. The diagram shows a summary of the light-independent reaction of photosynthesis.

CO 7. Cell Process Photosynthesis

PHOTOSYNTHESIS Chapter 6

FND Biology Semester 1 Study Guide. Organ Cell Organism Organ System Molecule Tissue

Temperature and light as ecological factors for plants

Energy Conversions. Photosynthesis. Plants. Chloroplasts. Plant Pigments 10/13/2014. Chapter 10 Pg

Porifera. Thomas M. Frost Trout Lake Station Center for Limnology University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin '"'. , ' I.

Ecosystems. 1. Population Interactions 2. Energy Flow 3. Material Cycle

FACTORS AFFECTING THE RATE OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Lecture-17. Electron Transfer in Proteins I

E ect Of SXR Beam Pipe Temperature On Undulator Magnet Temperature

Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration

Optically stimulated luminescence from quartz measured using the linear modulation technique

Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration: Photosynthesis

Photosynthesis and Life

Long-term variations in primary production in a eutrophic sub-estuary. I. Seasonal and spatial patterns

Photosynthesis. 1) Heterotrophs: 2) Autotrophs: 3) Phytoplankton:

Photosynthesis. The Sun powers life. capture about 5% of the Sun s energy and, through the process of, provide energy to.

CHAPTER 8 PHOTOSYNTHESIS

What is a Cnidarian?

Apical (Boron) Lateral (Boron) Growing edge (SNARF) Seawater ph T

CHAPTER 6 & 7 VOCABULARY

AP Biology. Photosynthesis

*Manuscript Click here to view linked References

AP Biology

AP Biology

PHOTOSYNTHESIS. Light Reaction Calvin Cycle

Chemical warfare on coral reefs: Sponge metabolites differentially affect coral symbiosis in situ

WJEC UNIT 3. ATP & Photosynthesis. Tyrone. R.L. John

CLASS 11 th. Photosynthesis

#22 Visible Spectrum of Chlorophyll from Spinach

Biology. Slide 1of 39. End Show. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

STUDENT LABORATORY Plant Respiration and Photosynthesis

VEGETATION PROCESSES IN THE PELAGIC: A MODEL FOR ECOSYSTEM THEORY

Lab #5 Multicellular Marine Primary Producers. Part 1: Photosynthesis and Photosynthetic Pigments

Cell Respiration Star 2

In Cellular Respiration, are removed from sugar and transferred to

PLANT PIGMENTS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS LAB

Joseph Geissler. Newark Science Park High School Mrs. Paulose

Chapter 10 Photosynthesis. Photosynthesis

Environmental Plant Physiology Photosynthesis - Aging. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

Photosynthesis - Aging Leaf Level. Environmental Plant Physiology Photosynthesis - Aging. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

Response to experimental warming in northern eelgrass populations: comparison across a range of temperature adaptations

Algal Physiology. I. Photosynthesis in algae II. Characteristics to distinguish algal divisions. I. Photosynthesis

Name: Photosynthesis. Class: Date: 76 minutes. Time: 76 marks. Marks: level 1, 2 and 3. Increasing demand. Comments:

I. Photosynthesis. Algal Physiology. I. Photosynthesis in algae II. Characteristics to distinguish algal divisions

Inter-polyp genetic and physiological characterisation of Symbiodinium in an Acropora valida colony

Natural Fluorescence Calculations: Terminology and Units

Cellular Energetics Review

Question Answer Mark Guidance 1 (a) (i) 2 max

What Are Coral Reefs?

The temperature dependence of the spectral and e ciency behavior of Si solar cell under low concentrated solar radiation

1/25/2018. Bio 1101 Lec. 5, Part A Chapter 6: Cellular Respiration

I. Photosynthesis. Algal Physiology. I. Photosynthesis in algae II. Characteristics to distinguish algal divisions

Spongilla lacustris. Photosynthesis by symbiotic algae in the freshwater sponge,

For Examiner s Use Total EMPA mark Surname. Candidate. Number. Other Names

Carbon Input to Ecosystems

Supplementary Figure 1. Observed Aragonite saturation variability and its drivers.

Complete the notes on photosynthesis in the spaces below.

photosynthesis notes Biology Junction Everything you need in Biology Photosynthesis All Materials Cmassengale I. Capturing the Energy of Life

Light and Photosynthesis. Supplemental notes Lab 4 Horticultural Therapy

% FOREST LEAF AREA. Figure I. Structure of the forest in proximity of the Proctor Maple Research Center -~--~ ~

Primary Producers. Key Ideas

Assessment of Vegetation Photosynthesis through Observation of Solar Induced Fluorescence from Space

Physiological Ecology. Physiological Ecology. Physiological Ecology. Nutrient and Energy Transfer. Introduction to Ecology

Photosynthesis is the main route by which that energy enters the biosphere of the Earth.

Biology Unit 3 Exam DO NOT WRITE ON THIS EXAM. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Unit 4.2: Photosynthesis - Sugar as Food

Heterotrophs: Organisms that depend on an external source of organic compounds

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Chapter What is a Plant? Biology. Slide 1 of 33. End Show. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

AP Biology Lab 4 PLANT PIGMENTS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Bleaching of the fire corals Millepora

Chapter 10. Marine Ecology

Laminaria saccharina photosynthesis measured in situ: photoinhibition and xanthophyll cycle during a tidal cycle

The main form of energy from the sun is in the form of electromagnetic radiation. Visible radiation (white light) used for photosynthesis ROY G.

Bio Ch 6 Photosynthesis Notes

Transcription:

Marine Biology (1998) 131: 613±617 Ó Springer-Verlag 1998 S. Beer á M. Ilan In situ measurements of photosynthetic irradiance responses of two Red Sea sponges growing under dim light conditions Received: 22 November 1997 / Accepted: 8 April 1998 Abstract Photosynthetic responses to irradiance by the photosymbionts of the two Red Sea sponges Theonella swinhoei (Gray) and Cliona vasti ca (Hancock) growing under dim light conditions were measured in situ (in September 1997) using a newly developed underwater pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) uorometer. Relative rates of photosynthetic electron transport (ETR) were calculated as the e ective quantum yield of photosystem II (Y ) multiplied with the photosynthetic photon ux (PPF). Photosynthesis versus irradiance (P-I ) curves, obtained within minutes, showed that individual specimens of both sponges, growing under very low light conditions, feature lower light saturation points as well as lower maximal ETRs than individuals growing under higher light. Evaluations of such curves using low irradiances of the actinic light source (20 to 130 lmol photons m )2 s )1 ) showed a general decrease in Y, with a shoulder from the lowest irradiance applied till 20 to 30 lmol photons m )2 s )1. Point measurements yielded ETRs close to what could be estimated from the P-I curves. These point measurements also revealed good correlations between the diurnally changing ambient irradiances (1 to 50 lmol photons m )2 s )1 ) and average ETR values for both species. Further analysis showed that although Y values varied considerably between the di erent point measurements, they did not decrease signi cantly with light under these very low irradiances. Therefore, PPF rather than Y seems to determine the in situ diel photosynthetic performance at the low ambient irradiances experienced by these sponges. Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe S. Beer (&) Department of Plant Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel M. Ilan Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel Introduction Although sponges are animals, many species feature symbiotic relationships with cyanobacteria or unicellular algae. These photosymbionts provide the sponge with organic photosynthate; this has been considered especially important for species inhabiting oligotrophic waters where planktonic foods are scarce (Wilkinson 1983). For example, it was argued that some species from the Great Barrier Reef were restricted to depths where irradiance levels were expected to be high enough to yield net diel O 2 evolution (Cheshire and Wilkinson 1991). Similarly, it was found that substantial portions of the energy requirement of a freshwater sponge could be provided by the photosymbionts under su cient light conditions (Sand-Jensen and Foldager Pedersen 1994). While such evaluations are based on assessments of gas exchange as measured under controlled conditions, supportive photosynthetic measurements in situ have been precluded largely by the lack of suitable portable underwater instrumentation. Pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) uorometry has recently been used in assessing photosynthetic properties of photosymbiont-containing invertebrates such as corals (Warner et al. 1996), and the development of a portable underwater PAM uorometer (the Diving- PAM, Walz Gmbh, Germany) has made in situ measurements possible as reported both for ascidians (Schreiber et al. 1997) and other organisms including several corals (Beer et al. 1998; Ralph et al. in preparation). While the advantage of using the Diving-PAM includes non-intrusive, fast and reliable in situ measurements (see preceding article of this issue), the method can only estimate rates of photosynthetic electron transport (ETR), ignoring any respirational components; thus gross rather than net rates of photosynthesis are measured. Therefore, it can not per se replace O 2 or CO 2 (including longer-incubation 14 CO 2 ) techniques in research where, e.g., gas exchange balances are sought. It could, however, be applied for

614 investigating the gross photosynthetic component in, for example, adaptations of photosymbiont-containing organisms to ambient light. In this work, we used PAM uorometry in situ for measurements of photosynthetic parameters in two marine sponges growing under dim light conditions. Materials and methods The same Diving-PAM (Walz Gmbh, Germany) as in the preceding paper of this issue (Beer et al. 1998) was used for measuring chlorophyll uorescence parameters of the two marine sponges Theonella swinhoei (Gray) and Cliona vasti ca (Hancock). These species were chosen because of their photosynthetically active symbionts; T. swinhoei is known to contain cyanobacteria (Wilkinson 1979) while Cliona spp. have been reported to harbour zooxanthellae (Rosell and Uriz 1992). The investigated sponges grew at depths of 2 to 4 m in crevices of the coral reef near Eilat, Israel (northern Red Sea, 34 54 E; 31 35 N), and were accessed by snorkelling. Three specimens of T. swinhoei (designated The 1 to 3) and two of C. vasti ca (Cli 1 and 2), measuring 10 to 30 cm 2 each, were identi ed in habitats featuring variable, but low (1 to 50 lmol photons m )2 s )1 photosynthetic photon ux, PPF), irradiances throughout the day, and all measurements were done on those individuals. The measurements were carried out during September 1997, at an ambient water temperature of 25 C. Estimations of light absorption by the sponges were attempted by measuring the re ectance of light by the tissue in the same way as for corals (see Beer et al. 1998). However, it was found that only about 1% of the incident light was re ected by Theonella swinhoei, while much of the light reaching Cliona vasti ca was visibly absorbed by a non-photosynthetic orange pigment. Because of these complications (as pointed out by a critical reviewer), it was decided not to include light absorption fractions in the calculations of ETR, and therefore only relative ETRs are given. Photosynthesis versus irradiance (P-I ) curves were generated by attaching the main light guide of the Diving-PAM to the surface of a sponge via the ``coral clip'' (Walz's terminology) with hooked rubber bands, and then initiating automatic light curve measurements using the internal light source of the instrument. In order to obtain lower than default actinic (photosynthesis-inducing) light levels, the Diving-PAM settings were changed to minimal values for the ``actinic light intensity'' and ``actinic light factor''. However, it was found that even lower irradiances were needed in order to obtain P-I curves with enough points below light saturation, and therefore the light curves were run with a circular, neutral density lter between the tip of the light guide and the sponge tissues. This lter, which reduced light by ca. 70%, was simply cut out as a circular disk from the negative of an exposed and developed lm, and was inserted into the ``coral clip''. Under such conditions, the ``measuring light intensity'' and ``gain'' had to be increased to their maximal settings in order to obtain an adequate uorescence signal. The e ective quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Y ) was measured by the Diving-PAM as Y ˆ (F m ) F )/F m, where F m is the maximal uorescence in light-adapted photosymbionts following the application of a 0.8 s for photosynthesis saturating light pulse (which reduces, or ``closes'', all reaction centres of PSII), and F is the uorescence yield of the photosymbiont at a given irradiance. Relative ETRs were calculated as Y PPF. Point measurements were carried out for di erent areas of the three Theonella swinhoei and two Cliona vasti ca sponges throughout the day in the same way as described earlier for corals (Beer et al. 1998). As in that work, the light guide cable of the PPF sensor (calibrated against the quantum sensor of a Li-Cor LI-18189 light meter) was xed to the ``leaf distance clip'' so as to measure ambient light perpendicular to the sponge tissue. Both Y and ETR were also plotted against PPF in order to evaluate which factor determined the photosynthetic rate at the low ambient irradiances at which these sponges grew. Results In experiments where di erent light exposure times were compared (20 to 60 s), it was found that exposure of the sponges to the actinic light beam for 30 s at each irradiance level was enough to generate optimal P-I curves. Therefore, the ``actinic light width'' was set to 30 s for all subsequent light curve measurements. Responses of ETR to increasing PPF (P-I curves) of the three Theonella swinhoei and two Cliona vasti ca sponges are depicted in Fig. 1. While T. swinhoei growing at the highest light level showed saturation of photosynthetic electron transport at 300 lmol photons m )2 s )1, the two individuals growing in dimmer light showed saturation at only about half that irradiance. Also the photosynthetic rate at light saturation decreased gradually with decreasing ambient irradiances for the three sponges. Similarly, C. vasti ca growing at very low light showed a considerably lower light saturation level, as well as a lower maximal photosynthetic rate, than did the specimen growing under the higher light level. At even lower actinic irradiances, obtained with the improvised neutral density lter (see ``Materials and methods''), Fig. 2 shows that Y decreased with PPF except for the rst three light levels following darkness, and that normal P-I curves could be obtained which Fig. 1 Theonella swinhoei, Cliona vasti ca. Relative photosynthetic electron transport rates (rel. ETR) as functions of incident irradiance (I, measured as PPF) for the various a T. swinhoei (The 1±3) and b C. vasti ca (Cli 1±2) individuals. Ambient incident irradiance (in lmol photons m )2 s )1 PPF) at the time of the light curve measurements of each sponge is indicated on the graphs

615 Fig. 2 Theonella swinhoei, Cliona vasti ca. E ective quantum yields of PSII (Y ) and relative photosynthetic electron transport rates (rel. ETR) as functions of incident irradiance (I, measured as PPF) for a, b T. swinhoei and c, d C. vasti ca as measured at low actinic irradiances. Ambient irradiances at the time of the measurements were 23 and 30 lmol photons m )2 s )1 for T. swinhoei and C. vasti ca, respectively merged well with the curves generated at higher light for those sponges growing under similar light conditions (cf. Fig. 1). The shoulders in the Y curves are similar to those obtained for corals at higher irradiances (Beer et al. 1998); as shown below, they represent a range of PPF in which Y is not restricted signi cantly by the irradiance (see Figs. 4, 5). Point measurements on the di erent Theonella swinhoei and Cliona vasti ca specimens showed that average photosynthetic ETRs related positively to changes in irradiance throughout the day (Fig. 3). These ETR values also correspond well with those expected from the P-I curves of Figs. 1 and 2, showing that both point measurements in situ (expressed as average values of several measurements) and photosynthetic rates derived from P-I curves as measured here may be valid ways to estimate the gross photosynthetic performance of these sponges. In order to evaluate the relative contributions of Y and PPF in determining the ETRs within the ambient irradiances experienced by these sponges during the day, the Y and ETR values of all point measurements contributing to Fig. 3 were plotted against PPF (Figs. 4, 5). Figure 4 shows that although the Y values of Theonella swinhoei tended to decrease with PPF, they were very scattered within the PPF range. A very similar picture was obtained for Cliona vasti ca (Fig. 5). Here, the possible downward trend of Y versus PPF was even less evident. Following multiplication of Y with PPF, the Fig. 3 Theonella swinhoei, Cliona vasti ca. Relative electron transport rates (rel. ETR) of a T. swinhoei and b C. vasti ca measured during various times of the day. Average ambient irradiances (in lmol photons m )2 s )1 PPF) experienced by each individual of T. swinhoei (The 1±3)andC. vasti ca (Cli 1±2) during the point measurements, as recorded by the Diving-PAM's PPF sensor, are indicated for each bar. Data are averages of 10 to 15 measurements SD; n.m., not measured

616 resulting relative ETR values of both species showed a positive linear correlation with PPF within this low-irradiance range. In all, this means that principally PPF alone (and not Y ) determines the photosynthetic ETR response to light at the low ambient irradiances at which these sponges grow. Discussion Fig. 4 Theonella swinhoei. a E ective quantum yields of PSII (Y )and b relative photosynthetic electron transport rates (rel. ETR) as functions of the ambient irradiance (I, measured as PPF) as recorded for each measurement by the Diving-PAMs PPF sensor. Data are from the same measurements as averaged in Fig. 3a Fig. 5 Cliona vasti ca. a E ective quantum yields of PSII (Y )and b relative photosynthetic electron transport rates (rel. ETR) as functions of the ambient irradiance (I, measured as PPF) as recorded for each measurement by the Diving-PAMs PPF sensor. Data are from the same measurements as averaged in Fig. 3b The photosynthetic responses of the two sponge species to light show very low saturating irradiances, being about 10% of those measured for some Red Sea corals (Falkowski and Dubinsky 1981; Beer et al. 1998). However, the sponges also received very low ambient light levels throughout even the bright summer days prevailing during our measurements. Within this irradiance range, photosynthesis was linearly correlated with PPF; the latter thus determines the measured ETR responses while Y is largely una ected. Our point measurement data also indicate that there were no marked di erences in the average photosynthetic responses to light between the di erent individuals of each species in response to the average daily light they received. On the other hand, maximal photosynthetic rates were higher in those sponges growing under the higher light levels. In all, these results show that within these species, the individuals were adapted to a generally low light exposure in terms of photosynthetic yields at low light, but that the photosynthetic capacity was higher in higher-light growing specimens. The latter may be due to elevated activities of enzymes in the photosynthetic CO 2 reduction cycle, but the ecological advantage of such a higher photosynthetic potential at high light levels remains obscure for these stationary low-light growing sponges. The amount of organic energy provided by the photosymbionts to the entire sponge will depend on several factors. Since the investigated sponges are >100 mm thick, and since the photsymbionts are restricted to their surface cell layers (Ilan unpublished), it seems that the latter must be very e cient if they were to contribute as much to the growth of the sponge as indicated for other species (Wilkinson 1983; Cheshire and Wilkinson 1991; Sand-Jensen and Foldager Pedersen 1994). It is also possible that smaller amounts of essential organic compounds such as vitamins are derived mainly from the photosymbionts, while the bulk energy is acquired by ingesting particulate and/or dissolved organic material. While PAM uorometry was found to be a suitable method for investigating photosynthetic properties of these marine sponges it will not replace, but rather complement, gas exchange methods in studies where diel energy balances are to be evaluated. Our results show, however, that the Diving-PAM can be used for in situ non-intrusive measurements of gross photosynthetic parameters related to adaptations of the photosymbiotic components of sponges to light. In addition to the results presented here regarding sponges, the Diving-PAM has been shown suitable in

617 three previous studies for in situ photosynthetic measurements of photosymbiotic components of several other marine invertebrates (Schreiber et al. 1997; Beer et al. 1998; Ralph et al. in preparation). Besides the suggestions regarding its application for corals as reported earlier (Beer et al. 1998), we would like to point out a few special considerations when using this instrument for measurements at low irradiances. Even when the ``actinic light intensity'' and the ``actinic light factor'' were set to their minimal values, and when the main light guide was placed as far away from the sponge tissue as possible while using the ``coral clip'', it was found to be too high to produce P-I curves with high resolution at the low-irradiance portions of the curves. This problem was circumvented in the present study by inserting a neutral density lter between the light guide and the sponge. This is, however, not an ideal solution since the modulated measuring light and the uorescence transfer back through the light guide, then become very weak and, consequently, uorescence values become too low. For the lter used (reducing light by ca. 70%), it was possible to increase the basic uorescence signal to acceptable values by increasing the ``measuring light intensity'' and ``yield'' to their highest values, but this would not be possible if using darker lters. Thus, the Diving-PAM is presently limited to producing light curves starting at above ca. 100 lmol photons m )2 s )1 or, if lters can be made, above ca. 20 lmol photons m )2 s )1. The PPF sensor is also relatively insensitive at low irradiances, and there is no resolution between single irradiance (lmol photons m )2 s )1 ) readings. Because of this shortcoming of the sensor, the point-measured values of Figs. 4 and 5 are displayed in vertical rows, creating a high scatter of ETR along the PPF axis. Despite these limitations, the results presented here con rm the potential of underwater PAM uorometry using the Diving-PAM as a fast, reliable and non-intrusive means of monitoring photosynthetic parameters of photosymbionts in situ. Acknowledgements We sincerely thank R. Weil, Stockholm, for the generous support without which this research could not have been done. References Beer S, Ilan M, Eshel A, Weil A, Brickner I (1998) Use of pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) uorometry for in situ measurements of photosynthesis in two Red Sea faviid corals. Mar Biol 131: 607±612 Cheshire AC, Wilkinson CR (1991) Modelling the photosynthetic production by sponges on Davies Reef, Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 109: 13±18 Falkowski PG, Dubinsky Z (1981) Light-shade adaptation of Stylophora pistillata, a hermatypic coral from the Gulf of Eilat. Nature 289: 172±174 Rosell D, Uriz MJ (1992) Do associated zooxanthellae and the nature of the substratum a ect survival, attachment and growth of Cliona viridis (Porifera: Hydromedia)? An experimental approach. Mar Biol 114: 503±507 Sand-Jensen K, Foldager Pedersen M (1994) Photosynthesis by symbiotic algae in the fresh water sponge, Spongilla lacustris. Limnol Oceanogr 39: 551±561 Schreiber U, Gademann R, Ralph PJ, Larkum AWD (1997) Assessment of photosynthetic performance of Prochloron in Lissoclinum patella in hospite by chlorophyll uorescence measurements. Pl Cell Physiol 38: 945±951 Warner MA, Fitt WK, Schmidt FW (1996) The e ects of elevated temperature on the photosynthetic e ciency of zooxanthellae in hospite from four di erent species of reef coral: a novel approach. Pl Cell 19: 291±229 Wilkinson CR (1979) Nutrient translocation from symbiotic cyanobacteria to coral reef sponges. In: Boury-Esnault N (ed) Colloques internationaux du C.N.R.S. No. 291 ± Biologie des spongiaires. Centre National de la Recherche Scienti que, Paris, pp 373±380 Wilkinson CR (1983) Net primary productivity of coral reef sponges. Science 219: 410±412