Calibration of Paroscientific Model 205 Pressure Sensor for use at Heard Island.

Similar documents
Instrument Test Report Number 643

INSTRUMENT TEST REPORT NUMBER 644. Drift Test of a Hydrological Services TB3A TBRG

Instrument Test Report ITR 656. Evaluation of Milos 500 AWS unit

Evaluation of Vaisala HMP45D Humidity Probes

Guidelines on the Calibration of Automatic Instruments for Weighing Road Vehicles in Motion and Measuring Axle Loads AWICal WIM Guide May 2018

What is the maximum distance I can have the remote sensors from the display?

IMPACT OF GROUND-BASED GPS PRECIPITABLE WATER VAPOR AND COSMIC GPS REFRACTIVITY PROFILE ON HURRICANE DEAN FORECAST. (a) (b) (c)

OPAG on Integrated Observing Systems. Workshop to Improve the Usefulness of Operational Radiosonde Data. (Submitted by the Secretariat)

A calibration facility for automatic weather stations

Development of standard calibration equipment for the rain gauges

Digital Stored Grain Quality Management. BinMaster Level Controls Lincoln, Nebraska, USA

WMO number: Internal Station number: same as WMO number, historic AWOS documents refer to the station as A19. Current Station Location

Real-World Performance of Temperature Measurements at Automated Weather Stations How well do we do it?

INSTRUMENT TEST REPORT 679

Operational Applications of Awos Network in Turkey

Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices

EAS 535 Laboratory Exercise Weather Station Setup and Verification

Quality assurance for sensors at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

Final Report August 2010

* * * Table (1) Table (2)

Specifications for a Reference Radiosonde for the GCOS Reference. Upper-Air Network (GRUAN)

EA-10/14. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices. Publication Reference PURPOSE

Loadcell Calibration - Evaluation of Uncertainties

MEASUREMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS AT AERONAUTICAL METEOROLOGICAL STATIONS

INSTRUMENT TEST REPORT 700

Legacy Calibration of the Automatic Weather Station Model 2 of the United States Antarctic Program

The AWS based operational urban network in Milano: achievements and open questions.

WeatherHawk Weather Station Protocol

Weather observations from Tórshavn, The Faroe Islands

DMI Report Weather observations from Tórshavn, The Faroe Islands Observation data with description

Land Navigation Table of Contents

Annex I to Resolution 6.2/2 (Cg-XVI) Approved Text to replace Chapter B.4 of WMO Technical Regulations (WMO-No. 49), Vol. I

METEOROLOGICAL WARNINGS STUDY GROUP (METWSG)

REGIONAL INSTRUMENT CENTER (RIC) MANILA Philippines (Regional Association V)

Country Report. India Meteorolog. gical ldepartment

Quality control methodology for temperature data of Automatic Weather Stations with non-wooden radiation shield

STATUS OF THE WIGOS DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS

WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION THE WMO TABLE DRIVEN CODES: THE 21 ST CENTURY UNIVERSAL OBSERVATION CODES

WS-9018U Wireless Weather Station. Instruction Manual

Soil Moisture Measurements

GPS Scout Backtrack Altimeter Model: GP123 USER MANUAL

Arctic. Antarctic. Olaf Klatt Olaf Boebel. Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Bremerhaven

CHAPTER 27 AN EVALUATION OF TWO WAVE FORECAST MODELS FOR THE SOUTH AFRICAN REGION. by M. Rossouw 1, D. Phelp 1

Country Report for Japan (Submitted by Kenji Akaeda, Japan Meteorological Agency)

ARG100 Rainfall Intensity Adjustments

Global NWP Index documentation

Maritime Weather Information: Automatic Reporting, A New Paradigm

User manual Handbediening Mode d emploi Modalità d uso Bedienungsanleitung

Guidelines on Quality Control Procedures for Data from Automatic Weather Stations

1 Introduction. Station Type No. Synoptic/GTS 17 Principal 172 Ordinary 546 Precipitation

Correcting Real Time Automatic Weather Stations Data Through Quality Checks and Analysis

Paroscientific, Inc. Digiquartz Technology Overview. Paroscientific, Inc.

NORTH SEA FLOW MEASUREMENT WORKSHOP 2004 In. St Andrews, Scotland

Applications. Remote Weather Station with Telephone Communications. Tripod Tower Weather Station with 4-20 ma Outputs

CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION

Antarctic Automatic Weather Station Data for the calendar year 2000

Tsunami detection component: discussion about the existing network and real-time data processing. Begoña Pérez Gómez, Puertos del Estado, Spain

Conductivity pressure correction for the 2000dbar conductivity cell

Appendix X for CAP 437 Offshore Helicopter Landing Areas Guidance on Standards.

The Meteorological Observatory from Neumayer Gert König-Langlo, Bernd Loose Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Bremerhaven, Germany

Centralized Forecasting Registration and Communication Requirements for Distribution Connected Variable Generators. IESO Training

The Canadian Climate Model 's Epic Failure November 2016

Seismic and Tsunami Observations of Indonesia

Vantage PRO2 Quick. Reference Guide

BUFR Table D - List of common sequences

EM ice thickness measurements during GreenICE 2004 field campaign

P2.3 Performance of drop-counting rain gauges in an operational environment. P.W. Chan * and C.M. Li Hong Kong Observatory, Hong Kong, China

The Fundamentals of Moisture Calibration

Report on the UNGEGN liaison with the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research *

CHAPTER CONTENTS REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING Page

Kestrel 4500 Pocket Weather Tracker

Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007

Quick Start Guide New Mountain Visit our Website to Register Your Copy (weatherview32.com)

World Meteorological Organization

SOUTH AFRICAN NAVY HYDROGRAPHIC OFFICE

Deriving Meteorological Data from free-to-air Mode-S broadcasts in an Australian Context.

AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG)

Quality assurance for sensors at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

Certificate: / 29 April 2014

Review of Anemometer Calibration Standards

Quick Reference Guide

Practical help for compiling CLIMAT Reports

Development of procedures for calibration of meteorological sensors. Case study: calibration of a tipping-bucket rain gauge and data-logger set

Certificate: / 30. April 2015

London Heathrow Field Site Metadata

Guidelines for the Submission of the World Weather Records 2011+

5.1 Use of the Consensus Reference Concept for Testing Radiosondes. Joe Facundo and Jim Fitzgibbon, Office of Operational Systems,

Discoverer Automated Weather System Data Quality Control Report

CAPACITY BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE RIC IN MANILA (PHILIPPINES)

Duo. Mintaka. Dual-Sensor Precision Barograph. User s Guide

AIRS observations of Dome Concordia in Antarctica and comparison with Automated Weather Stations during 2005

Atmospheric circulation analysis for seasonal forecasting

Quality Assurance and Quality Control

REQUIREMENTS FOR WEATHER RADAR DATA. Review of the current and likely future hydrological requirements for Weather Radar data

AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG)

Operating instructions for electronics

An Overview of the UW Hyperspectral Retrieval System for AIRS, IASI and CrIS

One of the coldest places in the country - Peter Sinks yet again sets this year s coldest temperature record for the contiguous United States.

Certification of a High Capacity Force Machine for Testing of Load Cells According to OIML R60

Technical Report DMI SYNOP AWS Summit. Data status March Ellen Vaarby Laursen. SYNOP weather station Summit.

Transcription:

INSTRUMENT TEST REPORT NUMBER 67 Calibration of Paroscientific Model 05 Pressure Sensor for use at Heard Island. Kent Gregory & Paul Huysing Physics Laboratory, OEB 15 July, 1994 Authorisation Jane Warne Senior Physicist Physics Laboratory 7 pages including 1 appendix page 1 of 7 ITR67

1. INTRODUCTION Prior to despatching Platform Transmitter Terminal (PTT) number 6741 to Heard Island, the Paroscientific pressure sensor model no. 05 serial no. 5550G (hereinafter pressure sensor ) had its calibration checked by the Physics Laboratory. The aim of the tests was to find if the pressure measurement uncertainty was within the Bureau of Meteorology's requirement of ±0.5 hpa for pressures from 900 hpa to 1050 hpa and temperatures -10 C to 10 C [1]. Heard Island is a sub-antarctic station positioned at longitude 53 South, latitude 73 East, and experiences mean air temperatures between -1 C to 3.5 C throughout the year []. The PTT will be installed about 5 metres above sea level and will transmit measurements once per minute to the Bureau of Meteorology via ARGOS.. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD The intended site for the PTT meant the pressure sensor would be operating in low temperatures, centred around 0 C. Therefore, the pressure sensor was placed in a refrigerator at 0 C for 17 hours prior to and during testing. The pressure sensor and the reference barometer were connected to pumps via hosing. The pressure was cycled once between 900 and 1050 hpa in 5 hpa steps and allowed at least 4 minutes to stabilise before each series of readings was taken. Pressure measurements were transmitted from the PTT to an ARGOS receiver every 60 seconds. The same method was used to calibrate the PTT at 3 C. A total of 47 readings at 0 C and 33 readings at 3 C were taken. The number of readings varied because some transmitted PTT messages were not received by the ARGOS receiver. A personal computer was used to collect the readings from the reference barometer (direct connection via IEEE-488) and the PTT (serial connection to an ARGOS receiver). The PTT transmitted a coded string of hexadecimal numbers which represented the various physical measurements. The pressure was coded as the first two numbers of this string. These numbers were converted into a pressure reading by the following formula; P = 900 + ((W1x4) + (W / 64)) x 0.15...(1) where P = pressure in hpa W1 = first transmitted number (integer from 0 to 55) W = second transmitted number (0,64,18, or 19). The formula limits the resolution of pressure measurements to 0.15 hpa. Furthermore, the formula is only applicable for pressures in the range 900 hpa to 1050 hpa and cannot generate pressure values above or below these limits. page of 7 ITR67

The reference pressure barometer used in these tests was a Druck (DPI140) Digital Pressure Indicator (s/n 79-89/) with a total uncertainty of ±0.08 hpa 1 directly traceable to the WMO RAV standard. 3. RESULTS The data from the tests appear in Appendix A. Figures 1 and are plots of the reference barometer readings versus the corrections of the pressure sensor at 0 C and 3 C respectively. The measurements made near 900 hpa at both temperatures were not used in the analysis (explained in Section 4.) Table 1 contains the mean and standard deviation of the corrections at 0 C and 3 C. U 95 is the total uncertainty of the pressure sensor measurements and was generated using the following formula; 95 σ corrections) + (U ref ) U 95 = ( ) t + (mean of where U 95 t 95 σ U ref = the total uncertainty of the pressure sensor measurements over the range 95-1050 hpa. = the t statistic to produce a 95% level of confidence = the standard deviation of the corrections (estimate of the standard deviation of the entire population) = uncertainty of the reference sensor (0.08 hpa). Table 1. Mean and standard deviation of the corrections, and U 95 of the pressure sensor measurements. All measurements in hpa Temperature Mean Standard deviation U 95 0 C -0.11 0.18 0.46 3 C -0.0 0.116 0.5 Linear least squares regression was used to fit a straight line to each data set. The lines of best fit appear with the corrections in Figures 1 and. Results of the regression and U 95 values applicable to the corrected measurements have been calculated and appear in Table. 1 Uncertainty was calculated using the root sum square method to 95% confidence. In this report, a correction is defined as the reference sensor measurement minus the test sensor measurement. page 3 of 7 ITR67

Figure 1. PTT pressure sensor response at 0 C 0.5 0.4 0.3 0. 0.1 0-0.1-0. -0.3-0.4-0.5 900 95 950 975 1000 105 1050 Reference pressure (hpa) Figure. PTT pressure sensor response at 3 C 0.5 0.4 0.3 0. 0.1 0-0.1-0. -0.3-0.4-0.5 900 95 950 975 1000 105 1050 Reference pressure (hpa) Table. Results of regression analysis. page 4 of 7 ITR67

( m measured pressure[hpa] ) Correction [hpa] = + c 1000 Temperature m c r U 95 0 C -5.41 5.300 0.901 ±0.17 3 C -.074.011 0.771 ±0.14 4. DISCUSSION The pressure conversion algorithm used by the PTT limits the range of pressure values to between 900 and 1050 hpa. At pressures above the theoretical limit of the algorithm, the PTT returned the value of 1050 hpa. It is expected, therefore, that for pressures below 900 hpa the PTT will return the value of 900 hpa, however this was not confirmed. At 0 C, the correction of the pressure sensor near 900 hpa was 0.06 hpa and deviates significantly from the expected correction of 0.43 hpa. It appears that the deviation in correction is a consequence of the sensor and not the algorithm, implying that the behaviour of the sensing element is non-linear below 95 hpa (see Figure 1.). This means the linear regression results supplied in Table are only applicable in the pressure range 95 to 1050 hpa. The most applicable calibration temperature for the PTT pressure sensor was 0 C, according to the information provided in []. Therefore, the pressure measurements made by the PTT at Heard Is. should be taken to have an uncertainty of ±0.46 hpa. Note that this uncertainty does not include additional uncertainty due to drift. Based on the data collected, the uncertainty of the PTT pressure sensor at 3 C is almost half that of the uncertainty at 0 C (compare U 95 values in Table 1). The linear regression statistics show that if a line of best fit was applied there would be a significant improvement in accuracy at both temperatures. It is interesting to note that the ratio between m 0 C and m 3 C is approximately the same as the ratio between c 0 C and c 3 C. A consequence of this is that the two lines of best fit intersect at a correction value of almost 0 hpa (-0.014 hpa). This correlation is indicative of a residual temperature dependency of the pressure readings. The nature of this relationship was not determined due to the short time available for tests prior to deployment. The PTT manufacturers claim the barometer is temperature compensated by the electronics [3]. However, from the data, it appears that the compensation algorithm could be improved. The algorithm is built into the electronic processing equipment in the PTT and therefore can only be changed by the manufacturer. 5. CONCLUSION page 5 of 7 ITR67

The Paroscientific pressure sensor model no. 05 serial no. 5550G inside PTT 6741 conformed to the Bureau of Meteorology s accuracy requirements of ±0.5 hpa[1] for the limited conditions listed below; = the uncertainty is valid for pressures from 95 to 1050 hpa, and temperatures from 0 to 3 C, = the uncertainty result was correct at the time of testing but makes no allowance for drift of the pressure sensor. Pressure measurements made near the bounds of its operating range should be treated with care. Before the sensor is used in higher temperature or altitude areas, a complete calibration should be performed. The sensor was not tested for long term drift or for temperatures outside the range of 0 to 3 C and therefore no comment can be made on how long the pressure sensor will remain within acceptable accuracy limits. It is recommended that whenever possible, the pressure sensor be checked against a transfer standard barometer. 6. REFERENCES [1]. Guidance Specification (Functional) for a General Purpose Automatic Weather Station, Bureau of Meteorology Specification no. A659, June 1989. []. Selected Surface Climate Data for Antarctic Stations, July 1967, Bureau of Meteorology, page 7. [3]. Facsimile, 14 April 1993, Remote Sensor Systems. page 6 of 7 ITR67

Comparisons at 0 C All measurements in hpa PTT Ref Ref-PTT Time 900.30 900.176-0.14 10:06:58 900.60 900.577-0.03 10:07:58 901.35 901.364 0.014 10:09:58 901.80 901.739-0.061 10:10:58 90.5 90.136-0.114 10:11:58 90.55 90.504-0.046 10:1:58 903.00 90.879-0.11 10:13:58 95.50 95.777 0.77 10:40:58 95.80 96.095 0.95 10:41:58 96.10 96.399 0.99 10:4:58 96.40 96.688 0.88 10:43:58 96.70 97.004 0.304 10:44:58 950.10 950.08-0.018 10:49:58 950.5 950.336 0.086 10:50:58 950.55 950.575 0.05 10:51:58 974.10 974.063-0.037 10:59:58 974.10 974.31 0.131 11:00:58 974.5 974.39 0.14 11:01:58 974.40 974.557 0.157 11:0:58 974.70 974.710 0.010 11:03:58 974.70 974.863 0.163 11:04:58 974.85 975.01 0.16 11:05:58 1001.40 1001.9-0.110 11:09:58 1001.40 1001.30-0.100 11:10:58 1001.40 1001.31-0.090 11:11:58 1001.40 1001.3-0.080 11:1:58 1001.40 1001.33-0.070 11:13:58 105.5 105.04-0.10 11:1:58 105.5 104.90-0.350 11::58 105.10 104.77-0.330 11:3:58 104.95 104.6-0.330 11:4:58 104.80 104.48-0.30 11:5:58 104.65 104.34-0.310 11:6:58 104.50 104. -0.80 11:7:58 104.35 104.11-0.40 11:8:58 104.0 103.98-0.0 11:9:58 104.0 103.86-0.340 11:30:58 104.05 103.75-0.300 11:31:58 103.90 103.64-0.60 11:3:58 1050.75 1050.43-0.30 11:40:58 1050.45 1050.16-0.90 11:41:58 1050.30 1049.87-0.430 11:4:58 1050.00 1049.59-0.410 11:43:58 1049.70 1049.31-0.390 11:44:58 1049.40 1049.04-0.360 11:45:58 1049.10 1048.76-0.340 11:46:58 1048.80 1048.49-0.310 11:47:58 APPENDIX A Comparisons at 3 C All measurements in hpa PTT Ref Ref- PTT Time 901.0 901.63 0.063 10:44:4 901.35 901.444 0.094 10:45:4 901.50 901.608 0.108 10:46:4 901.80 901.954 0.154 10:48:4 97.75 97.81 0.071 10:5:4 97.75 97.945 0.195 10:53:4 97.90 98.080 0.180 10:54:4 98.0 98.343 0.143 10:56:4 949.95 949.888-0.06 11:05:4 949.95 949.979 0.09 11:06:4 949.95 950.088 0.138 11:07:4 950.5 950.198-0.05 11:08:4 950.5 950.304 0.054 11:09:4 975.15 975.144-0.006 11:14:4 975.30 975.0-0.098 11:15:4 975.30 975.67-0.033 11:16:4 975.30 975.333 0.033 11:17:4 975.45 975.401-0.049 11:18:4 1000.05 1000.01-0.040 11:3:4 1000.05 1000.01-0.040 11:4:4 1000.05 1000.0-0.030 11:5:4 1000.05 1000.03-0.00 11:6:4 1000.05 1000.03-0.00 11:7:4 105.40 105.5-0.150 11:36:4 105.5 105.17-0.080 11:37:4 105.5 105.09-0.160 11:38:4 105.10 105.0-0.080 11:39:4 105.10 104.93-0.170 11:40:4 1051.35 1051.13-0.0 11:47:4 1051.0 1050.96-0.40 11:48:4 1050.90 1050.78-0.10 11:49:4 1050.75 1050.61-0.140 11:50:4 1050.60 1050.44-0.160 11:51:4 page 7 of 7 ITR67