Aerosol Air Mass Type Mapping Over Urban Areas From Space-based Multi-angle Imaging Ralph Kahn NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Mexico City MISR Research Aerosol Retrieval March 06, 2006 Patadia, Kahn et al. 2013
Eyjafjalljökull Volcano Ash Plume MISR Standard Aerosol Retrieval, 19 April 2010 MISR Team, JPL and GSFC
The NASA Earth Observing System s First Light: February 24, 2000 Terra Satellite MODIS MOPITT ASTER MISR CERES Source: Terra Project Office / NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer http://www-misr.jpl.nasa.gov http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov Nine CCD push-broom cameras Nine view angles at Earth surface: 70.5º forward to 70.5º aft Four spectral bands at each angle: 446, 558, 672, 866 nm Studies Aerosols, Clouds, & Surface
Ten Years of Seasonally Averaged Mid-visible Aerosol Optical Depth from MISR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov includes bright desert dust source regions MISR Team, JPL and GSFC
MISR = 0.04 + 0.75 x MODIS Correlation Coeff = 0.902 Std Dev (MISR-MODIS) = 0.041 Ocean MISR = 0.09 + 0.60 x MODIS Correlation Coeff = 0.713 Std Dev (MISR-MODIS) = 0.117 Land Over-ocean regression coefficient 0.90 Regression line slope 0.75 MODIS QC 1 Over-land regression coefficient 0.71 Regression line slope 0.60 MODIS QC = 3 Kahn, Nelson, Garay et al., TGARS 2009
MISR-MODIS Coincident AOT Outlier Clusters Dark Blue [MISR > MODIS] N. Africa Mixed Dust & Smoke Cyan [MODIS > MISR, AOD large] Indo-Gangetic Plain Dark Pollution Aerosol Green [MODIS >> MISR] Patagonia and N. Australia MODIS Unscreened Bright Surface Kahn et al., TGARS 2009
Smoke from Mexico -- 02 May 2002 Aerosol: Amount Size Shape Medium Spherical Smoke Particles 0.0 1.2 -.25 3.0 0.0 1.0 Dust blowing off the Sahara Desert -- 6 February 2004 Large Non-Spherical Dust Particles 0.0 1.2 -.25 3.0 0.0 1.0
Kahn et al., JGR 2001 With current technology, we are aiming for Regional-to-Global Aerosol Type Discrimination something like this 5 Groupings Based on Aerosol Properties 13 Groupings Based on Aerosol Properties Global, Monthly Aerosol Maps Based on Expected MISR Sensitivity The examples shown here are simulated from aerosol transport model calculations With MISR About a dozen Aerosol Air Mass type distinctions, based on 3-5 size bins, 2-4 bins based on SSA, and spherical vs. non Sensitivity depends on conditions; AOD >~0.15 needed, etc. Adding NIR & UV wavelengths, Polarization should increase this capability
MISR Aerosol Type Distribution Spherical Non-Absorbing Spherical Absorbing Non-Spherical Kahn, Gaitley, Garay, et al., JGR 2010
SAMUM Campaign Morocco June 04, 2006 Falcon HSRL Ouarzazate (30.93, -6.91) AOT(558) ~0.30-0.45 Tinfou (30.23, -5.61) AOT(558) ~0.45-0.55 0.5 Ouarzazate AERONET A. Ansmann 0.9 Tinfou Sun Photometer W. von Hoyningen-Huene & T. Dinter Spectral Optical Depth 0.45 0.4 0.35 AOT (440 nm) AOT (500 nm) AOT (675 nm) 0.3 6:00 8:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 Time (UTC) MISR AOT(558) ~ 0.30-0.45 Spectral Optical Depth 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 AOT (440 nm) AOT (500 nm) AOT (670 nm) MISR AOT(558) ~ 0.45-0.55 0.4 6:00 8:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 Time (UTC)
MISR SAMUM Aerosol Air Masses (V19) - June 04, 2006 Orbit 34369, Path 201, Blocks 65-68, 11:11 UTC Ouarzazate AOT(558) ~0.30-0.45 a Tinfou AOT(558) ~0.45-0.55 Ouarzazate ANG ~0.5-0.6 b Tinfou ANG ~0.1-0.7 Ouarzazate SSA(558) ~0.95-0.99 c Tinfou SSA(558) ~0.99-1.0 Ouarzazate FrSph ~0.4-0.6 d Tinfou FrSph ~0.6-0.8 (30.1, -6.4) (27.9, -5.6) 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.9 1.5 0.94 0.97 1.0 0.3 0.7 1.0 A dust-laden density flow in the SE corner of the MISR swath High SSA, ANG & Fraction Spherical region SE of Ouarzazate, includes Zagora Kahn et al., Tellus 2009
MISR SAMUM Aerosol Air Mass Validation - June 04, 2006 Falcon F-20 HSRL - Thin layers of small, bright particles 1 2 3 1 3 2 32 1 1 32 NOAA/HYSPLIT Back Trajectories -Source in N Algeria for 2, 3 but not 1. Kahn et al., Tellus 2009
Oregon Fire Sept 04 2003 Orbit 19753 Blks 53-55 MISR Aerosols V17, Heights V13 (no winds) 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.0 1.2 2.4 0 5000 10,000 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 10 Height (km) 8.5 7.5 6.5 5.5 4.5 3.5 P1 Height (km) 8.5 7.5 6.5 5.5 4.5 3.5 P2 Height (km) 8.5 7.5 6.5 5.5 4.5 3.5 P3 Height (km) 8.5 7.5 6.5 5.5 4.5 3.5 P4 Height (km) 8.5 7.5 6.5 5.5 4.5 3.5 P5 8 6 4 2.5 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 1.5 2 P 1-2 P 4-5 0.5 0 50 100 Number of Pixels 0.5 0 100 200 Number of Pixels 0.5 0 50 100 Number of Pixels 0.5 0 50 100 Number of Pixels 0.5 0 20 40 60 Number of Pixels 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Atmospheric Stabilit Kahn, et al., JGR 2007
Wildfire Smoke Injection Heights & Source Strengths [These are the two key parameters representing aerosol sources in climate models] % of Plumes injected above boundary layer stratified by vegetation type & year MISR Stereo Heights: ~3400 Smoke Plumes Over N. America Val Martin et al. ACP 2010 MODIS Smoke Plume Image & Aerosol Amount Snapshots GoCART Model-Simulated Aerosol Amount Snapshots for Different Assumed Source Strengths Different Techniques for Assuming Model Source Strength Overestimate or Underestimate Observation Systematically in Different Regions Petrenko et al., JGR 2012
Volcanic Plume Properties: Height, Particle Size, Shape, Brightness MISR Observations Iceland Volcano Eruption 07 May 2010 Plume Height Kahn & Limbacher, ACP 2012 Plume Particles vs. Background: Larger, darker, more non-spherical, much more abundant; Brighten & decrease in size downwind
Sahara January 2007 July 2007 Mean Best Estimate AOD Map & Histogram Distribution AOD < 0.2 AOD 0.2 AOD < 0.2 AOD 0.2 Number of Successful Mixtures vs. Normalized AOD & vs. Normalized Scattering Angle Range Most Frequent Lowest Residual Aerosol Type Mixture Group, Stratified by AOD Histograms of Lowest Residual & All Successful Aerosol Type Mixture Groups
MISR Aerosol V22 Algorithm Upgrade Priorities Supporting Dust, Smoke, & Aerosol Pollution Applications Based on 10 Years of Validation Data -- Low-light-level gap & quantization noise -- High-AOD underestimation of AOD (missing low-ssa particles; algorithm issues) -- Missing Medium-mode particles (r eff ~ 0.57, 1.28 µm) -- More spherical, absorbing particles (SSA ~ 0.94, 0.84, maybe 0.74) -- Mixtures of smoke & dust analogs; more Bi- and Tri-modal spherical mixtures -- Flag indicating when there is insufficient sensitivity for particle property retrieval (possibly different retrieval path under this condition) -- Lack of a good Coarse-mode Dust Optical Analog remains an issue Kahn, Gaitley, Garay, et al., JGR 2010
Improving Air Quality Models Zhang et al., GRL. 2007 Surface-based mass-spec aerosol composition measurements Need to isolate Near-surface Aerosol Component Need sufficient Spatial-Temporal Coverage to capture Severe Events Detailed Chemical Speciation often required High Spatial Resolution often required (e.g., in Urban areas) Recent efforts use models to parse satellite column AOD; speciate spherical particle fraction [Y. Liu et al. JAWMA 2007; Martin and von Donkellar, 2008]
Pollution Aerosol Concentrated in Ganges Valley near Kanpur, India (MISR) MISR mid-visible AOD [Winter, 2001-2004; white --> AOD >0.6] NCEP Winds + Topography [Black=surface; Red=850 mb; contours=vertical, solid=subsidence] DiGirolamo et al., GRL, 2004
Air Quality: BL Aerosol Concentration [MISR + MODIS] AOD & GEOS-Chem Vertical Distribution [BL PM 2.5 ] / [Total-col. AOD] 2001-2006 Derived PM 2.5 Van Donkelaar et al., Environ. Health Prespect. 2010
MISR - GEOS-Chem Regression Model To Map Near-surface Aerosol Pollution -Constrained Model PM 2.5 SO 4 Eastern US Western US EPA Surface Measurements MISR / GEOS-CHEM Retrieval Surface network (IMPROVE) measurements Using MISR Particle Shape as well as AOT to constrain model --> much better result Will add column Size and SSA information when MISR retrieval is more robust Y. Liu et al, JAWMA 2007
Characterizing seasonal changes in anthropogenic and natural aerosols w.r.t. preceding season over the Indian Subcontinent Winter (Dec-Feb) Pre-monsoon (Mar-May) Monsoon (Jun-Sep) Post-monsoon (Oct-Nov) Increased wintertime transport of anthropogenic pollution Himalayan foothills - advection of anthropogenic particles from Indo- Gangetic Basin Pre-monsoon influx of dust from the Great Indian Desert and Arabian Peninsula Large influence of anthropogenic particles due to pre-monsoon biomass burning f Natural Additional influence of maritime particles produced by high surface wind Index f Anthro. Reduced dust loading due to monsoon precipitation Large influence of anthropogenic particles due to seasonal peak in biomass burning and reduced dust transport Index uses MISR-retrieved particle shape and size constraints to separate natural from anthorpogenic aerosol Dey & Di Girolamo JGR 2010
Mapping AOD & Aerosol Air-Mass-Type in Urban Regions Nadir INTEX-B/MILAGRO MISR March 06, 2006 Orb 33062 Path 26 Block 75 Mexico City Nadir 70 aft Patadia et al.
Urban Pollution AOD & Aerosol Air Mass Type Mapping INTEX-B, 06 & 15 March 2006 AOD Fr. Non-Sph. ANG SSA March 06 March 15 Aerosol Air Masses: Dust (non-spherical), Smoke (spherical, spectrally steep absorbing), and Pollution particles (spherical, spectrally flat absorbing) dominate specific regions Patadia et al., JGR submitted
MODIS10-Year Global/Regional Over-Water AOD Trends Trend Statistical Significance Statistically negligible (±0.003/decade) global-average over-water AOD trend Statistically significant increases over the Bay of Bengal, E. Asia coast, Arabian Sea Zhang & Reid, ACP 2010
Key Attributes of the MISR Version 22 Aerosol Product AOT Coverage Global but limited sampling on a monthly basis AOT Accuracy Maintained even when particle property information is poor Particle Size 2-3 groupings reliably; quantitative results vary w/conditions Particle Shape spherical vs. non-spherical robust, except for coarse dust Particle SSA useful for qualitative distinctions Aerosol Type Information diminished when AOT < 0.15 or 0.2 Particle Property Retrievals improvement expected w/algorithm upgrades Aerosol Air-mass Types more robust than individual properties PLEASE READ THE QUALITY STATEMENT!!! and more details are in publications referenced therein
frequent, global snapshots; aerosol amount & aerosol type maps, plume & layer heights Satellites Aerosol-type Predictions Remote-sensing Analysis Retrieval Validation Assumption Refinement Regional Context CURRENT STATE Initial Conditions Assimilation Suborbital targeted chemical & microphysical detail Model Validation Parameterizations Climate Sensitivity Underlying mechanisms space-time interpolation, DARF & Anthropogenic Component calculation and prediction point-location time series Kahn, Survy. Geophys. 2012
Future Mission Possibilities AirMSPI SAM-CAAM [Systematic Aircraft Measurements to Characterize Aerosol Air Masses] Primary Objectives: Interpreting and enhancing satellite aerosol-type retrieval products Characterizing statistically particle properties for the major aerosol types, providing detail unobtainable from space, but needed to improve: -- Satellite aerosol retrieval algorithms Bakersfield CA 18 January 2013 (+47.5 View) -- The translation between satelliteretrieved aerosol optical properties and species-specific aerosol mass and size