Advanced Medicinal Chemistry SLIDES B

Similar documents
Easier and Better Exploitation of PhysChem Properties in Medicinal Chemistry

Introduction to Chemoinformatics and Drug Discovery

Structural biology and drug design: An overview

ASSESSING THE DRUG ABILITY OF CHALCONES USING IN- SILICO TOOLS

György M. Keserű H2020 FRAGNET Network Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Translating Methods from Pharma to Flavours & Fragrances

Hydrogen Bonding & Molecular Design Peter

Data Quality Issues That Can Impact Drug Discovery

Hit to Lead Michael Rafferty

Using AutoDock for Virtual Screening

In silico pharmacology for drug discovery

Dr. Sander B. Nabuurs. Computational Drug Discovery group Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics Radboud University Medical Centre

FRAUNHOFER IME SCREENINGPORT

Introduction. OntoChem

Supporting Information (Part II) for ACS Combinatorial Science

Rules for drug discovery: can simple property criteria help you to find a drug?

Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution

Considering the Impact of Drug-like Properties on the Chance of Success

Structure-based maximal affinity model predicts small-molecule druggability

Plan. Day 2: Exercise on MHC molecules.

Chemical library design

Computational Methods and Drug-Likeness. Benjamin Georgi und Philip Groth Pharmakokinetik WS 2003/2004

Receptor Based Drug Design (1)

Amorphous Blobs of Hope and Other Flights of Fancy. Steve Muchmore Chemaxon UGM April 18, 2011 Budapest

Alkane/water partition coefficients and hydrogen bonding. Peter Kenny

Multi-Parameter Optimization: Identifying high quality compounds with a balance of properties

Using Bayesian Statistics to Predict Water Affinity and Behavior in Protein Binding Sites. J. Andrew Surface

Virtual Libraries and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery Processes using KNIME

Enamine Golden Fragment Library

Bioengineering & Bioinformatics Summer Institute, Dept. Computational Biology, University of Pittsburgh, PGH, PA

Dispensing Processes Profoundly Impact Biological, Computational and Statistical Analyses

Comparison of log P/D with bio-mimetic properties

ChemBioNet: Chemical Biology supported by Networks of Chemists and Biologists. Affinity Proteomics Meeting Alpbach. Michael Lisurek 15.3.

Virtual screening for drug discovery. Markus Lill Purdue University

Microcalorimetry for the Life Sciences

Building innovative drug discovery alliances

Relative Drug Likelihood: Going beyond Drug-Likeness

Retrieving hits through in silico screening and expert assessment M. N. Drwal a,b and R. Griffith a

Molecular Dynamics Graphical Visualization 3-D QSAR Pharmacophore QSAR, COMBINE, Scoring Functions, Homology Modeling,..

ChemDiv Beyond the Flatland 3D-Fragment Library for Fragment-Based Drug Discovery (FBDD)

Introduction to FBDD Fragment screening methods and library design

Unlocking the potential of your drug discovery programme

Simplifying Drug Discovery with JMP

Open PHACTS Explorer: Compound by Name

Reaxys Medicinal Chemistry Fact Sheet

Lead Optimization Studies on Novel Quinolones Derivatives as CYP-450 Inhibitor by using In-Silico Modulation

FRAGMENT SCREENING IN LEAD DISCOVERY BY WEAK AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY (WAC )

Fragment Hotspot Maps: A CSD-derived Method for Hotspot identification

Flow of information in a drug discovery pipeline. 7th lecture Modern Methods in Drug Discovery WS16/17 1

Computational Chemistry in Drug Design. Xavier Fradera Barcelona, 17/4/2007

Molecular docking, 3D-QSAR studies of indole hydrazone as Staphylococcus aureus pyruvate kinase inhibitor

Problem solving steps

bcl::cheminfo Suite Enables Machine Learning-Based Drug Discovery Using GPUs Edward W. Lowe, Jr. Nils Woetzel May 17, 2012

Computational Chemistry in Drug Discovery. Darren Green EBI 2016

Biologically Relevant Molecular Comparisons. Mark Mackey

Synthetic organic compounds

Ignasi Belda, PhD CEO. HPC Advisory Council Spain Conference 2015

In Silico Design of New Drugs for Myeloid Leukemia Treatment

Free energy, electrostatics, and the hydrophobic effect

16 years ago TODAY (9/11) at 8:46, the first tower was hit at 9:03, the second tower was hit. Lecture 2 (9/11/17)

In Silico Investigation of Off-Target Effects

COMPUTER AIDED DRUG DESIGN (CADD) AND DEVELOPMENT METHODS

Computational chemical biology to address non-traditional drug targets. John Karanicolas

Advances in Multi-parameter Optimisation Methods for de Novo Drug Design

CHEM 4170 Problem Set #1

ADME SCREENING OF NOVEL 1,4-DIHYDROPYRIDINE DERIVATIVES

THERMODYNAMICS IN DRUG DESIGN. HIGH AFFINITY AND SELECTIVITY

Applying Bioisosteric Transformations to Predict Novel, High Quality Compounds

Structure-Based Drug Discovery An Overview

Computational Models for the Prediction of Intestinal Membrane Permeability

Early Stages of Drug Discovery in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Drug Design 2. Oliver Kohlbacher. Winter 2009/ QSAR Part I: Motivation, Basics, Descriptors

The use of Design of Experiments to develop Efficient Arrays for SAR and Property Exploration

TRAINING REAXYS MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY

Physical-Chemistry Factors Affecting Oral Absorption. Objectives. ph - Partition Theory. 27 September Chapter 23 1

PROVIDING CHEMINFORMATICS SOLUTIONS TO SUPPORT DRUG DISCOVERY DECISIONS

Bioisosterism. A Rational Approach in Drug Design. 刘俊辉 Sept. 30th Sila-majantol 1b. lily-of-the-valley flowers but more terpineol-like odor

Quantitative structure activity relationship and drug design: A Review

molecules ISSN

Virtual affinity fingerprints in drug discovery: The Drug Profile Matching method

Optiform Technologies A Fit-for-Purpose Solution to Solid-State Issues

PHYSIO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE DRUG. It is the interaction of the drug with its environment

Towards Physics-based Models for ADME/Tox. Tyler Day

The impact of aromatic ring count on compound developability are too many aromatic rings a liability in drug design?

Exploring the black box: structural and functional interpretation of QSAR models.

Section V. Summary and conclusions

Internet Journal of Medical Update

Targeting protein-protein interactions: A hot topic in drug discovery

Data Mining in the Chemical Industry. Overview of presentation

Evolution of toxic properties of Anti Alzheimer s Drugs through Lipinski s rule of five

ADME Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 8. The Prediction of Human Intestinal Absorption by a Support Vector Machine

Structure based drug design and LIE models for GPCRs

Bridging the Dimensions:

REQUIREMENTS FOR A MAJOR IN CHEMISTRY (B.A.): Eight lecture courses, the associated laboratory courses, and senior research (52 credits)

Progress of Compound Library Design Using In-silico Approach for Collaborative Drug Discovery

Research of New Class C beta-lactamase Inhibitor by Molecular Docking s Method

MSc Drug Design. Module Structure: (15 credits each) Lectures and Tutorials Assessment: 50% coursework, 50% unseen examination.

Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology

Driving Serendipity: the Era of Active Ingredients Discovery. Valentina Sedini Scientific Marketing

Synthetic organic compounds

Transcription:

Advanced Medicinal Chemistry Filippo Minutolo CFU 3 (21 hours) SLIDES B

Drug likeness - ADME two contradictory physico-chemical parameters to balance: 1) aqueous solubility 2) lipid membrane permeability

Drug likeness - ADME important parameters 1) LogP (o LogD ph ) P = [mol] n-oct [mol] water P : partition coefficient (neutral species) D : distribution coefficient (ionizable species) D = [mol] n-oct [mol] ph(aq) P = [mol] n-oct (1-a) [mol] ph(aq) 2) PSA (o TPSA): polar surface area (Å 2 )

Drug likeness - ADME important parameters LogP (o LogD ph ) P : partition coefficient (neutral species) D : distribution coefficient (ionizable species) D = [mol] n-oct [mol] ph(aq) P = [mol] n-oct (1-a) [mol] ph(aq)

Drug likeness - ADME Lipinski rule (or rule of five ) bad absorption if: 1) molecular weight > 500 2) LogP > 5 3) H-bond donors > 5 P = [mol] n-oct [mol] water O H O N H 4) H-bond acceptors > 10 O Me O N H SNC: MW 400; LogP 3-5; H-don 0-2; H-acc 7 NO COOH!!! Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25.

Drug likeness - ADME distribution of therapeutic categories in a LogP/MW plot

Drug likeness - ADME Veber rule in addition to Lipinski, bad absorption if : 1) rotatable bonds (Rot) > 10 SNC: Rot 7 2) TPSA > 140Å 2 SNC: TPSA 90 Å 2 (opt. ~ 70 Å 2 ) J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615-2623.

Drug likeness - ADME oral PhysChem score: Traffic Light (TL) ChemMedChem 2006, 1, 1229-1236.

Drug likeness - ADME Drug Disc. Today 2006, 11, 175-180.

Drug likeness - ADME automated ADMETox analysis

Drug likeness - ADME Lead-likeness Drug Disc. Today 2006, 11, 175-180.

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation Drug development process Gene to Function Target to Validated Target Screen to Hit Hit to Lead Lead to Candidate Candidate to Clinical Candidate FTIH To PoC Clinical Phase II Clinical Phase III Manufacturing Launch, Marketing etc. Candidate: efficacy and safety in vivo, large-scale economic synthesis Lead: satisfactory potency and selectivity; suitable physico-chemical and pharmacokinetic properties; lack of toxicity Hit: dose-dependent good activity in preliminary screening problems with HTS: high MW hits & leads many molecules failed to pass clinical phases (those with higher chances have MW lower than average)

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation Drug development process Gene to Function Target to Validated Target Screen to Hit Hit to Lead Lead to Candidate Candidate to Clinical Candidate FTIH To PoC Clinical Phase II Clinical Phase III Manufacturing Launch, Marketing etc. frammenti attivi identification of low MW key fragments (X-ray, in silico, etc.) to be further developed towards lead generation problems of fragments: low activity (K d, K i, IC 50 ~ mm) Ligand efficiency (LE): a specific efficiency that is normalized to the non-h atoms number [normalized to molecular size]

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation Nature Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 689-700.

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation + target (e.g. protein) ligand K d K i (IC 50 ) complex DG = RTln(K)

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation DG = ΣDG i Int 1 Int 2 Int 3 Int 1 Int 2 Int 6 high MW low MW Int 5 Int 4

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation Ligand efficiency (LE): considers the number of non-h atoms (N) (LE) Dg = DG N = RTln(K) N [kcal/(mol atom)] N = number of non-h atoms R = universal gas constant = 0.001984 kcal/( K mol) K K i, K d, IC 50 (expressed in M, mol/l) LE represents the energetic contribution normalized to the number of non-h atoms Drug Disc. Today 2004, 9, 430-431.

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation Ligand efficiency (LE): considers the number of non-h atoms (N) (LE) Dg = DG N = RTln(K) N [kcal/(mol atom)] exemples N = number of non-h atoms R = universal gas constant = 0.001984 kcal/( K mol) K K i, K d, IC 50 (expressed in M, mol/l) MW 500 (N ~ 36); K i = 10 nm; MW 175 (N ~ 13); K i = 1.4 mm (10 5 higher!) LE = 0.30 Drug Disc. Today 2004, 9, 430-431.

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation evolution of b-secretase inhibitors peptidomimetics (low LE) IC 50, = 1.6 nm; LE = 0.19 excellent inhibitor in vitro, but it does not cross BBB fragments X-ray, low IC50, but high LE lead development J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 1116-1123 e 1124-1132.

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation evolution of b-secretase inhibitors lead development fragments X-ray, low IC50, but high LE J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 1116-1123 e 1124-1132.

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation evolution of b-secretase inhibitors J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 1116-1123 e 1124-1132.

Fragment-based approach: low MW lead generation evolution of b-secretase inhibitors J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 1116-1123 e 1124-1132.