Tornadogenesis in Supercells: The Three Main Ingredients. Ted Funk

Similar documents
Tornadoes forecasting, dynamics and genesis. Mteor 417 Iowa State University Week 12 Bill Gallus

Tornadoes forecasting, dynamics and genesis. Mteor 417 Iowa State University Week 12 Bill Gallus

Chapter 3 Convective Dynamics Part VI. Supercell Storms. Supercell Photos

Chapter 14 Thunderstorm Fundamentals

MET Lecture 26 Tornadoes I

Practical Use of the Skew-T, log-p diagram for weather forecasting. Primer on organized convection

Tornado Occurrences. Tornadoes. Tornado Life Cycle 4/12/17

NOAA S National Weather Service

Meteorology Lecture 19

TOPICS: What are Thunderstorms? Ingredients Stages Types Lightning Downburst and Microburst

The Earth System - Atmosphere III Convection

Tornadoes. tornado: a violently rotating column of air

Severe Thunderstorms. MET 200 Lecture 24 Flooding in Hawaii and Intro to Severe Thunderstorms. MET 200 Lecture 24 Severe Thunderstorms.

Thunderstorms. Ordinary Cell Thunderstorms. Ordinary Cell Thunderstorms. Ordinary Cell Thunderstorms 5/2/11

Solutions to Comprehensive Final Examination Given on Thursday, 13 December 2001

Warm season forecasting! Some material adapted from Material Produced at COMET for their Residence Course in Hydrometeorology

MET Lecture 29 Tornadoes IV

1st Tornado Photograph

Advanced Spotter Training: Anticipating Severe Weather Threats. Professor Paul Sirvatka College of DuPage Meteorology

P12.7 MESOCYCLONE AND RFD INDUCED DAMAGING WINDS OBSERVED IN THE 27 MAY 2004 SOUTHWEST OHIO SUPERCELL

Meteorology Lecture 18

NOAA S National Weather Service

Weather Systems III: Thunderstorms and Twisters

Chapter 3 Convective Dynamics 3.4. Bright Bands, Bow Echoes and Mesoscale Convective Complexes

Advanced Spotter Training Lesson 4: The Nature of Thunderstorms

1 of 7 Thunderstorm Notes by Paul Sirvatka College of DuPage Meteorology. Thunderstorms

Tornado Dynamics. Readings:

11A.2 Forecasting Short Term Convective Mode And Evolution For Severe Storms Initiated Along Synoptic Boundaries

Severe Thunderstorms

P8.14 CLASSIC AND HP MINI-SUPERCELLS IN SOUTHEAST OREGON AND SOUTHWEST IDAHO ON 3 MAY

The Severe Weather Event of 7 August 2013 By Richard H. Grumm and Bruce Budd National Weather Service State College, PA 1. INTRODUCTION and Overview

Chapter 8 cont. Clouds and Storms. Spring 2018

Examination #3 Wednesday, 28 November 2001

P10.4 EXAMINATION OF TORNADIC AND NON-TORNADIC SUPERCELLS IN SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA ON 28 APRIL 2002

contact with ground for 1 hour plus, starting 1500 MDT moved N., covered about 37 km width varied m

Thunderstorm: a cumulonimbus cloud or collection of cumulonimbus clouds featuring vigorous updrafts, precipitation and lightning

Test Form: A Key Final Exam: Spring 2011

June 7, 2008 Northeast Illinois Tornado Outbreak: Applying to Fundamentals in Storm Spotting

Storm-Relative Flow and its Relationship to Low-Level Vorticity in Simulated Storms

Department of Geosciences San Francisco State University Spring Metr 201 Monteverdi Quiz #5 Key (100 points)

Charles A. Doswell III, Harold E. Brooks, and Robert A. Maddox

ATS 351, Spring 2010 Lab #11 Severe Weather 54 points

Foundations of Earth Science, 6e Lutgens, Tarbuck, & Tasa

Storm-Relative Flow and its Relationship to Low-Level Vorticity in Simulated Storms

Review of Basic Severe Thunderstorm & Tornado Spotting Concepts. Jim Allsopp National Weather Service Chicago/Romeoville, IL

Supercells. Base lecture and Graphics created by The COMET Program May University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

Type of storm viewed by Spotter A Ordinary, multi-cell thunderstorm. Type of storm viewed by Spotter B Supecell thunderstorm

Thunderstorm: a cumulonimbus cloud or collection of cumulonimbus clouds featuring vigorous updrafts, precipitation and lightning

9D.3 THE INFLUENCE OF VERTICAL WIND SHEAR ON DEEP CONVECTION IN THE TROPICS

1. INTRODUCTION GSP Dr, Greer, SC tropical cyclones. 1 This study did not include tornadoes associated with

HAZARDOUS WEATHER 1. Dr. Julie Laity Geography 266

April 13, 2006: Analysis of the Severe Thunderstorms that produced Hail in Southern Wisconsin

24 TH CONFERENCE ON SEVERE LOCAL STORMS, OCTOBER 2008, SAVANNAH, GEORGIA

P3.17 THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLE LOW-LEVEL MESOCYCLONES WITHIN A SUPERCELL. Joshua M. Boustead *1 NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Topeka, KS

Weather report 28 November 2017 Campinas/SP

P1.16 ADIABATIC LAPSE RATES IN TORNADIC ENVIRONMENTS

The Jarrell Tornado of May 27, 1997

Mature Tornado. Tornado funnel and debris cloud. Mature Tornado

Thunderstorm Dynamics. Helicity and Hodographs and their effect on thunderstorm longevity. Bluestein Vol II. Page

Weather Systems. The air around high-pressure weather systems tends to swirl in a clockwise direction, and usually brings clear skies.

10/21/2012. Chapter 10 Thunderstorms. Part II. Growth and Development of ordinary Cell Thunderstorms Thunderstorm Electrification.

Thunderstorms and Severe Weather. (Chapt 15)

Section 13-1: Thunderstorms

May 16, 2009 (Part II) - A Mesoscale and Radar Perspective of the Tornadic Supercells. Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. WFO BGM

Chapter 8 cont. Clouds and Storms

November 22, 1992, I-71, Carroll County KY by Irma Doran

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH & CLIMATE SCIENCES NAME SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY Fall ERTH FINAL EXAMINATION KEY 200 pts

Kenneth L. Pryor* and Gary P. Ellrod Center for Satellite Applications and Research (NOAA/NESDIS) Camp Springs, MD

Anthony A. Rockwood Robert A. Maddox

CLOUDS & THUNDERSTORMS

Thunderstorms. Stages in the development of a thunderstorm

MET Lecture 34 Downbursts

WARM SECTOR TORNADOES WITHOUT DISCERNIBLE SURFACE BOUNDARIES AND WITH MINIMAL DEEP LAYER SHEA

12.2 MESOVORTICES FORMED WITHIN BOW ECHOES: THEIR GENESIS AND SENSITIVITY TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND SYSTEM COLD POOL

Jonathan M. Davies* Private Meteorologist, Wichita, Kansas

Chapter 3 Convective Dynamics

The Oakfield, Wisconsin, Tornado from July Brett Berenz Student at the University of Wisconsin

THE EFFECTS OF LOW-LEVEL WIND SHEAR ORIENTATION, DEPTH, AND MAGNITUDE ON LOW-LEVEL ROTATION IN SIMULATED SUPERCELL THUNDERSTORMS

P12.7 THE ROLE OF A SURFACE BOUNDARY AND MULTIPLE CELL-MERGERS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 21 APRIL 2003 TORNADO IN UPSTATE SOUTH CAROLINA

13.5 DOPPLER RADAR ANALYSIS OF THE 28 APRIL 2002 LA PLATA, MD TORNADIC SUPERCELL

CHAPTER 11 THUNDERSTORMS AND TORNADOES MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

Effects of microphysical drop size distribution on tornadogenesis in supercell thunderstorms

Chapter 3 Convective Dynamics Part V ñ Bright Bands, Bow Echoes and MCCs. Bright band associated with stratiform precipitation in a squall line system

Final Exam Clicker Questions ATOC 1050 Spring 2011 Chapter 16: Mountain Snowstorms

P10.1 TORNADOGENESIS IN A SIMULATED HP SUPERCELL

P10.18 ORIGINS OF THE GRANITE FALLS, MN TORNADO, JULY 25, 2000 REVISITED

Department of Earth & Climate Sciences Spring 2016 Meteorology 260

16.4 SENSITIVITY OF TORNADOGENESIS IN VERY-HIGH RESOLUTION NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS TO VARIATIONS IN MODEL MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERS

Severe Thunderstorm Forecasting and Climatology in Arizona. Ken Drozd Warning Coordination Meteorologist NOAA/NWS Tucson, AZ

Department of Earth & Climate Sciences Spring 2016 Meteorology 260

A MESOSCALE RE-ANALYSIS OF ANTICIPATED SEVERE WEATHER THREATS IN THE OZARKS DURING THE WEEK OF MAY 4-10TH 2003

Convective Dynamics. Jeremy A. Gibbs. March 10, University of Oklahoma

severe VOLUME 5, NUMBER 1, FEBRUARY 1980

Evolution and Maintenance of the June 2003 Nocturnal Convection

ESCI 344 Tropical Meteorology Lesson 11 Tropical Cyclones: Formation, Maintenance, and Intensification

Severe Weather with a strong cold front: 2-3 April 2006 By Richard H. Grumm National Weather Service Office State College, PA 16803

Genesis mechanism and structure of a supercell tornado in a fine-resolution numerical simulation

Proximity sounding analysis for derechos and supercells: an assessment of similarities and differences

David O. Blanchard* and Brian A. Klimowski National Weather Service, Flagstaff, Arizona

Investigating the Environment of the Indiana and Ohio Tornado Outbreak of 24 August 2016 Using a WRF Model Simulation 1.

Transcription:

Tornadogenesis in Supercells: The Three Main Ingredients Ted Funk NWS Louisville, KY Spring 2002 Environmental Parameters Supercells occur within environments exhibiting several wellknown characteristics -Ample low-level moisture -Sufficient CAPE (instability) -Deep-layered vertical wind shear -Significant forcing mechanism While these parameters are related to supercell tornadoes, they are not the primary ingredients needed for tornadogenesis.

The Tornado Cyclone - To predict severe weather, we usually need to look no farther than the detection of a supercell thunderstorm on Doppler radar, as most supercells produce wind damage and/or large hail. - However, to forecast tornadoes, we need to understand the tornadogenesis process itself. This process occurs in a small part of the storm, i.e., within the tornado cyclone. - Atornado cyclone typically is a few kms (1-2 miles) across. Most supercells have a low- level tornado cyclone that extends to near the ground, although in many cases the cyclone does not contract to form a tornado. Doppler radar usually observes the tornado cyclone, not usually the tornado itself. - So, the key is determining under what conditions are tornado cyclones most likely to produce tornadoes. 3 Ingredients for Tornado Formation - Supercell tornado formation appears to follow a process of: 1) Development of a persistent rotating updraft 2) Development of a special rear flank downdraft that contains rotation to aid in the development of rotation to the ground 3) Focusing of that low- level rotation through convergence and upward spin- up into the updraft - All 3 ingredients must occur in concert to form significant (F2 or higher) tornadoes; since these ingredients are uncommon in the atmosphere, the joint occurrence of all 3 make significant tornadoes also uncommon. - Weaker, short- lived tornadoes can occur within supercells or nonsupercells without all 3 ingredients.

3 Ingredients for Tornado Formation Persistent Updraft Special Rear Flank Downdraft Enhanced Storm-Relative Helicity Persistent Updraft - The first step in tornadogenesis is the development of a persistent, rotating updraft. This can occur on a variety of scales, from the radarobserved mesocyclone on a scale of several kms, down to scales closer to that of the tornado itself that may not be as readily observed on radar at appreciable distances. - The updraft must persist long enough to ingest air containing enhanced storm- relative helicity (SRH) in order to develop rotation. If the environmental vertical wind shear is strong, then horizontal turning in the atmosphere creates enhanced SRH that is tilted into the updraft to produce vertical rotation.

Persistent Updraft - The stronger the updraft and higher the ambient SRH, the more likely the updraft can organize into a significant mesocyclone. Thus, the presence of high values of ambient CAPE and SRH is important to the rapid development and persistence of a rotating updraft. This process can occur in as short as about 10 minutes or as long as about an hour. - Recent research suggests that 0-3km CAPE may be as or more important than total CAPE in an attempt to assess the degree of lowlevel vertical acceleration important in the tornadogenesis process. - The updraft then must continue to persist as the RFD develops, focuses, and concentrates rotation below it. It must also persist though the tornado life cycle. Thus, the longer an updraft persists, the more likely tornado formation becomes. Persistent Updraft - Apersistent, rotating updraft creates a dynamic pressure gradient force that allows low- level air to be pulled upward into the updraft. This is important, i.e., the ability of the updraft to create boundary layer lift below the level where positive parcel buoyancy creates lift. This allows for the ingestion of low- level SRH. - Astrong low- level cold pool beneath the updraft is detrimental to tornado formation, as this causes a cold outflow the blocks the ingestion and steep lift of moist, unstable, sheared air. - Large values of low- level humidity, as evidenced by low lifting condensation levels (LCLs) are more conducive to tornado formation, as strong cold pools are inhibited.

Enhanced SRH -Storm-relative helicity (SRH) estimates thunderstorm's potential to acquire a rotating updraft given an environmental vertical wind shear profile. It integrates the effects of S-R winds and the horizontal vorticity (generated by vertical shear of the horizontal wind) within the inflow layer of a storm. -Directional (speed) shear favors streamwise ( crosswise ) horizontal vorticity that are conducive to right turning supercells and tornadoes (splitting supercells). -Traditionally, 0-3 km SRH is used to evaluate storm type and rotation potential. Large-scale (measurable) values of 300-500 m2/s2 are considered strong. These values indicate the potential for storm rotation, which is related to tornadoes, but not potential for tornadoes themselves. -More important is SRH in the 0-1 km layer in order to create low-level rotation. Look for measurable values around 100-300 m2/s2. Enhanced SRH -Given high amounts of ambient SRH, some supercells will and some will not produce tornadoes. Thus, large-scale environmental SRH is not enough. There must be local augmentation of SRH to generate tornadoes. -SRH varies quite strongly on scales that are never sampled with normal sensor networks, i.e., soundings, profilers, VAD. These much higher, narrow zones of SRH result in the baroclinic generation of horizontal vorticity that is tilted and stretched vertically to generate strong low-level rotation. -Tornadic supercell inflow values of SRH sometimes exceed 1000 m2/s2! Hodograph constructed from mobile Doppler observations of the inflow region of the June 2, 1995 Dimmitt, TX violent tornadic supercell (from VORTEX).

Enhanced SRH -Tornado formation in supercells is most common when the storm interacts with a boundary. The boundary focuses and provides the high levels of SRH. -Boundaries include fronts, outflow boundaries, cloud-no cloud boundaries (including anvil shadows), horizontal convective rolls, old temperature gradient zones, etc. These boundaries may be undetectable in Metar surface data. They may or may not be evident in visible satellite imagery. A temp contrast (baroclinicity) that develops on uniform low-level flow will generate horizontal vorticity that alters low-level wind flow. This can cause a large local increase in convergence and SRH. This condition persists even after the temp contrast weakens, making the boundary undetectable or diffuse, despite its potential importance to tornado development. Enhanced SRH Ideas to remember in the warning process: -If environmental (synoptic) values of SRH are high, less local augmentation is needed for tornadogenesis (and vice versa). -If environmental SRH is relatively low, tornadoes can still occur if a significant boundary intersects the storm resulting in a pronounced local increase in SRH. -Monitor radar, surface data, and satellite data for the presence and evolution of boundaries, both in the pre-storm and near-storm environments. Be especially cognizant of earlier boundaries that may have faded from detection in satellite or surface data, as they still may be important in generating localized SRH. -If a supercell translates parallel to the boundary, then tornadogenesis is especially likely.

Special RFD - Rear flank downdrafts in tornadic supercells seem to have an unusual character compared to non- tornadic supercells and thunderstorm downdrafts in general. - The RFD helps translate rotation to the ground. Upon reaching the ground, some of the RFD air wraps around and flows into the low- level updraft vortex, while other air flows away from the vortex. Special RFD - In a study of 30 supercells, those tornado cyclones that produced tornadoes were associated with RFDs that reached the ground with more CAPE, less CIN, and larger values of wet bulb and equivalent potential temperature (i.e., a warm RFD). - This allows more of the RFD air to flow into the rotating updraft zone and stretch vertically, thereby enhancing low- level rotation. - What governs the thermodynamic character of the RFD? - low- level humidity, i.e., small surface/low- level dewpoint depressions and low LCLs, in the near storm environment (not always common) - size and type of precipitation particles in the hook echo (i.e., the rear- side precipitation cascade)

Special RFD -Environments with relatively high dewpoint depressions (e.g., surface temps in 80s or 90s with dewpoints in 60s) favor a cold RFD (due to more evaporation) and hinder tornadogenesis, unless other processes or reports suggest otherwise. In such cases, the nature of precipitation in the hook echo becomes increasingly important. -Relatively few, large drops or hailstones will cause little cooling, but will lead to an enhanced reflectivity area in the hook. In contrast, large amounts of small drops could result in evaporation and cooling that is a detriment to tornadogenesis. -This is consistent with our observation that some tornadic supercells in Kentucky have been associated with an area of high reflectivity in the hook, close to the tornado location. This reflectivity max likely is due to large drops and hail, thereby decreasing evaporation. Swirling debris within the tornado cyclone may also contribute to the max. Tornadic Supercell in Kentucky The May 28, 1996 tornadic supercell had a definitive reflectivity max at the time an F3 tornado was on the ground. The RFD is evident by the blue pixels just south of the max. The reflectivity configuration suggests that some RFD air was wrapping around and up into the tornado cyclone. Storm-relative velocity showed the tornado cyclone (probably not the tornado itself), with enhanced inflow and SRH just east of the cyclone. The cyclone intensified and contracted at 0.5 degree elevation prior to this time, suggesting tornadogenesis.

Non-Tornadic Supercell in Kentucky This supercell on April 19, 1995 produced golfball to baseball size hail (note the high reflectivity core aloft and hail spike). The environment was characterized by dry air aloft and moderate low-level humidity, and strong vertical wind shear. The shear resulted in mesocylone development and an apparent tornado cyclone at the lowest level (SRM data not shown). But the absence of at least 1 of the 3 parameters (warm RFD) precluded tornado development, despite the low-level hook. Supercell Cloud

Summary -Supercells normally produce severe weather. But, relatively few produce tornadoes. Thus, understanding and identifying (or at least inferring) those processes associated with significant tornadoes (F2 or more) is crucial. -These processes include a persistent updraft, enhanced low-level SRH, and a warm, special RFD. However, even these processes are not the answer to the tornadogenesis problem at all times. -Weaker tornadoes are possible in supercells despite the lack of an ingredient. The apparent lack of an ingredient, however, may be because of a potentially difficult to detect process (e.g., enhanced SRH along a boundary). -Doppler radar may not resolve low-level small-scale circulations, but usually will resolve the mesocyclone and perhaps the tornado cyclone at close range. -The best way to improve tornado warnings is through a joint effort to incorporate 1) knowledge of the storm environment (local SRH, low-level RH, boundaries, etc.), 2) acute radar signature analysis skills, and 3) accurate and timely spotter reports.