Real-Time Loss Estimates for Severe Thunderstorm Damage: The Event of April 27-28, 2002

Similar documents
The AIR Severe Thunderstorm Model for the United States

THE AIR SEVERE THUNDERSTORM MODEL FOR AUSTRALIA

Ten Years after Andrew: What Should We Be Preparing for Now?

The AIR Crop Hail Model for Canada

Exposure Disaggregation: Introduction. By Alissa Le Mon

At the Midpoint of the 2008

Air Masses, Fronts and Weather Systems

Tornado Hazard Risk Analysis: A Report for Rutherford County Emergency Management Agency

CHAPTER 10. TORNADOES AND WINDSTORMS

The AIR Tropical Cyclone Model for Mexico

HURRICANES AND TORNADOES

CS-11 Tornado/Hail: To Model or Not To Model

Lab 21. Forecasting Extreme Weather: When and Under What Atmospheric Conditions Are Tornadoes Likely to Develop in the Oklahoma City Area?

LECTURE #15: Thunderstorms & Lightning Hazards

Regional Wind Vulnerability. Extratropical Cyclones Differ from Tropical Cyclones in Ways That Matter

Severe Weather: Tornadoes and Hurricanes

Superstorm Sandy What Risk Managers and Underwriters Learned

Local Weather History

TORNADOES. DISPLAY VISUAL A Tornado Is... Tornadoes can: Rip trees apart. Destroy buildings. Uproot structures and objects.

...TORNADO CONFIRMED NEAR SANFORD...BROADWAY...HOLLY SPRINGS AND RALEIGH IN LEE AND WAKE COUNTIES COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA...

Kentucky Weather Hazards: What is Your Risk?

4 Forecasting Weather

Module 11: Meteorology Topic 6 Content: Severe Weather Notes

The AIR Bushfire Model for Australia

Claim: Global warming is causing more and stronger tornadoes REBUTTAL

Announcements. No office hours tomorrow (Wed. March 30) Homework 5 extra credit:

Charles Kuster Leadville, CO. Personal Overview

Your Task: Read each slide then use the underlined red or underlined information to fill in your organizer.

Hazardous Weather and Flooding Preparedness. Hazardous Weather and Flooding Preparedness

3 Severe Weather. Critical Thinking

The Severe Weather Event of 7 August 2013 By Richard H. Grumm and Bruce Budd National Weather Service State College, PA 1. INTRODUCTION and Overview

GC Briefing. Weather Sentinel Tropical Storm Michael. Status at 8 AM EDT (12 UTC) Today (NHC) Discussion. October 11, 2018

COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM TORNADOES

Tornadoes. Tornadoes are an interesting topic because as often as they occur in the United

Tornadoes pose a high risk because the low atmospheric pressure, combined with high wind velocity, can:

ALLEY CATS: HOW EL NIÑO INFLUENCES TORNADO ALLEY AND THE THREAT OF CATASTROPHES

FLOOD/SCS EVENT, APRIL 28 MAY 4

U.S. WIND, SCS, FLOOD, WINTER WEATHER

SIGNIFICANT EVENTS Severe Storms November 1994 January 1996 August 1998 and May 2000 March 2002 May 2002 Champaign County

Tropical Update. 5 PM EDT Thursday, August 27, 2015 Tropical Storm Erika

Current Details from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center

Hurricanes. Cause: a low pressure storm system over warm ocean water. Effect: potential massive widespread destruction and flooding.

A bright flash that is produced due to electrical discharge and occurs during a thunderstorm.

Eastern Shore Weather and Climate. Bill Sammler Warning Coordination Meteorologist National Weather Service Wakefield, VA

Ch. 3: Weather Patterns. Sect. 1: Air Mass & Fronts Sect. 2: Storms Sect. 3: Predicting the Weather

A Preliminary Severe Winter Storms Climatology for Missouri from

PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT...UPDATED FATALITY INFO NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE RALEIGH NC 435 PM EDT MON APR

SAMPLE. SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS Wind Report. Robinson, Smith & Walsh. John Smith. July 1, 2017 REFERENCE: 1 Maple Street, Houston, TX 77034

Tropical Update. 5 PM EDT Sunday, October 7, 2018 Tropical Storm Michael, Tropical Storm Leslie, & Invest 92L (30%)

Colorado State University (CSU) Atlantic Hurricane Season Forecast

Custom Weather Forecast

Tropical Update. 5 PM EDT Sunday, September 10, 2017 Hurricane Irma, Hurricane Jose, Tropical Wave (60%)

US/Global Natural Catastrophe Update

Tropical Update 11 AM EDT Thursday, September 6, 2018 Tropical Depression Gordon, Hurricane Florence, Invest 92L (90%) & African Tropical Wave (50%)

Miami-Dade County Overview

Ellen L. Mecray NOAA Regional Climate Services Director, Eastern Region Taunton, MA

Radar Meteorology AOS 444 October 28, 2002 Laboratory 6: WATADS study of Oakfield tornado from KGRB

AIRCURRENTS: EUROPEAN WINDSTORM MODELS: QUESTIONS YOU SHOULD ASK

National Situation Report As of 5:00 a.m. EDT Tuesday, April 4, 2017

NWS HURRICANES June 3, 2015

U.S. WIND, SCS, FLOOD, WINTER WEATHER

Tropical Update. 5 PM EDT Tuesday, September 5, 2017 Hurricane Irma, Tropical Storm Jose, and Tropical Depression Thirteen

10. Severe Local Storms (Thunderstorms)

Tornadoes. Tornadoes COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM TORNADOES

Introduction to How Hurricanes Work hurricane season hurricanes typhoons cyclones Defining a Hurricane tropical cyclone tropical depressions

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Colorado State University (CSU) Atlantic Hurricane Season Forecast

Complete Weather Intelligence for Public Safety from DTN

Hurricane Matthew. National Weather Service Wilmington NC. Steven Pfaff, WCM.

1st Annual Southwest Ohio Snow Conference April 8, 2010 Abner F. Johnson, Office of Maintenance - RWIS Coordinator

MIAMI-SOUTH FLORIDA National Weather Service Forecast Office

Summary of Natural Hazard Statistics for 2008 in the United States

Current Details from the National Hurricane Center (NHC)

DAMAGE SURVEY OF THE BINGER, OKLAHOMA TORNADO OF MAY 22, 1981

Saturday, June 9, :30 a.m. EDT

Tropical Update. 11 AM EDT Wednesday, October 10, 2018 Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Leslie & Tropical Storm Nadine, Caribbean Low (40%)

How Wind Technologies Work. WHITE PAPER 4 April 2017

Modelling the impact of climate change and weather related events. Seong Woh Choo Head of R&D and Chief Underwriting Officer

The AIR Severe Thunderstorm Model for Europe

Thunderstorms. Thunderstorm Recipe

4 Forecasting Weather

Risk Assessment and Mitigation. Hurricane Checklist

Tornadoes in America: The Oklahoma Disaster in Context

How Detailed Weather Data and Geospatial Tools Can Be Used to Increase Net Income

Tornadoes. Be able to define what a tornado is. Be able to list several facts about tornadoes.

Air Masses, Fronts & Storms

NEWARN Tabletop Exercise Norfolk, Nebraska

Ahead of the Wave: The Change Coming to the Saffir-Simpson

Measuring Hail and Wind Ground-Truth to Facilitate Rapid Response


SITE-SPECIFIC HAIL ANALYSIS

CATEX Hurricane Zachary

Tropical Update. 11 AM EDT Tuesday, October 9, 2018 Hurricane Michael, Tropical Storm Leslie, Tropical Storm Nadine

New Directions in Catastrophe Risk Models

Current Details from the National Hurricane Center (NHC)

Tropical Update. 5 PM EDT Thursday, September 7, 2017 Hurricane Irma, Hurricane Jose, and Hurricane Katia

Chapter 3: Weather Fronts & Storms

Unit 4. This unit will enable you to improve coordination and communication with State and local agencies when hazardous weather threatens.

Current Details from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center

Impact Based Warning Tornado - Infrastructure

Transcription:

AIR Special Report July 2002 Real-Time Loss Estimates for Severe Thunderstorm Damage: The Event of April 27-28, 2002 Technical Document_LPSR_0207

I. Overview On April 27-28, 2002, a frontal system generated severe thunderstorms that produced tornadoes, hail, and straight-line windstorms across 26 states. The system was noteworthy in that an unusually severe tornado struck Maryland, far to the east of regions normally associated with intense tornadoes. Given the tornado s proximity to Washington D.C. and its densely populated suburbs, AIR Worldwide Corporation (AIR) made the decision to run the severe thunderstorm model to estimate potential losses. Within days of the event, AIR delivered estimates of insured loss to clients. It was the first time that estimates were provided so soon after the actual occurrence of an event of this type. The AIR severe thunderstorm team collected, cleaned, and analyzed the available data and used them as input to the severe thunderstorm model for the United States. The model produced a range of possible scenarios and corresponding loss estimates, posted on the ALERT (AIR Loss Estimates in Real Time) website, that were later seen to be consistent with survey results issued by Property Claim Services (PCS). April 28 NOAA satellite image of thunderstorms over Maryland and Virginia In the following report, we present a description of the meteorological system of April 27-28 and of the process by which the AIR team collected and prepared the data for use by the severe thunderstorm model in order to estimate losses. Using material gathered by the AIR post-disaster survey team, we also illustrate the scale of damage for the most severe episode of the frontal system s effects, a tornado rated F-4 on the Fujita Scale that struck La Plata, Maryland, on April 28. 2002 AIR Worldwide Corporation SPECIAL REPORT 1

II. Event Description On Saturday and Sunday, April 27-28, 2002, a severe thunderstorm system occurred from Kansas to Maryland, as a vigorous upper-level system moved from the Midwest to the East. Warm moist air from the Gulf of Mexico clashed with cold, dry air from Canada to produce damaging tornadoes, hail, and high winds. Information released by the Storm Prediction Center (SPC) of the National Weather Service (NWS) includes 36 reports of tornadoes, 291 of hailstorms, and 188 of straight-line windstorms over the course of 48 hours on April 27-28. The exact number of discrete occurrences behind these reports will not be known until the data has been analyzed further. Storm Prediction Center reports of tornadoes, hail, and wind for April 27-28, 2002 with inset of F-3 tornado track, Bollinger County Missouri, April 28 An F-3 tornado struck in Union and Johnson counties in Illinois on Saturday, April 27, and an F-2 tornado struck in southeastern Johnson County that same day. Another tornado touched down briefly in Marshall County, West Virginia. Preliminary assessment of a tornado in Rutherford County, Tennessee, suggests it was an F-3 with a path 3.2 miles long and 0.2 miles wide. Another F-2 tornado occurred in Shenandoah County, Virginia. The NWS confirmed that an F-3 tornado touched down Sunday morning in Bollinger County, Missouri, with a path length of 4 miles and a width of 150 to 200 yards. 2002 AIR Worldwide Corporation SPECIAL REPORT 2

The strongest tornado struck La Plata, MD, on Sunday night, April 28, 2002, at about 7:10 p.m., EDT (21:10 GMT). It touched down between the towns of Risen and Marbury and followed a 24-mile path across Charles County, passing near La Plata, the county seat, before continuing on for another 6 miles through Calvert County. An initial damage survey, undertaken by the NWS office in Baltimore, resulted in a rating of F-5 on the Fujita tornado intensity scale. However, a later re-examination of the damage led the National Weather Service to reclassify the tornado as a strong F-4, with a maximum wind speed of 260 mph (418 kph). Severe damage (F-3/F-4) was observed across a path width of about one quarter of a mile and over a length of about five miles. This lay within a broader swath of less severe damage. The path width corresponding to F-1/F-2 damage was estimated at about one mile. The tornado lasted about 45 minutes, according to officials at the NWS. Path of the La Plata tornado showing intensities, as estimated by NOAA, with photos of damage taken by the AIR post-disaster survey team According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), about 2% of all tornadoes nationally fall into the F4-F5 category. Since 1950, there have been about 51 F-5 tornadoes in the U.S. Maryland has experienced two F-4 tornadoes previously. 2002 AIR Worldwide Corporation SPECIAL REPORT 3

III. The Process of Real-Time Loss Estimation Estimating losses from severe thunderstorm events in real time is a challenging task. Microevents (that is, the individual tornadoes, hailstorms, or straightline windstorms that make up the larger atmospheric system, or macroevent) are typically of short duration sometimes lasting only minutes and more often than not occur out of the range of weather stations or anemometers. When instruments are within range, the force of tornadic winds is so severe they are often destroyed. When no measured wind speeds are available, scientists and engineers must estimate wind speeds from observed damage. The data gathering and analysis process usually takes several months, after which the data enters the official SPC database. In order to deliver loss estimates to clients in near real time, data had to be gathered and processed quickly. Much of the data provided in real time by the SPC are from first-hand observations of microevents (examples are shown in the table below). The AIR team scrutinized each new report to insure its consistency with the emerging picture of the macroevent. Note: All data is considered preliminary Tornado Reports Time F-Scale Location County State Lat Lon Comments 1905 UNK ERIE COUNTY ERIE NY 4280 7873 2105 UNK RUSTBURG CAMPBELL VA 3728 7910 0137 UNK TREES DOWN, POOL AND SHEDS OVERTURNED, EYEWITNESS REPORT OF FUNNEL REPORTED BY BROADCAST MEDIA PUBLIC REPORT HIGHWAY 29 AND 622 TWIN OAK TRAILER PARK LARGE TREE DOWN UPROOTED AND SNAPPED IN HALF. MOBILE HOME TIPPED AND ROLLED. CHURCH ROOF BLOWN OFF. POWER LINES PUBLIC REPORTED THROUGH SHERIFF DEPT 5 SW WESTMINSTER OCONEE SC 3460 THAT TORNADO TOUCHED DOWN...WITH DOWNED 8317 TREES AND POWER LINES BLOWN DOWN. Sample Preliminary Tornado Reports from SPC April 28, 2002 The AIR team examined the data and eliminated what appeared to be duplicate reports of microevents. Using the cleaned data as input, the severe thunderstorm model was then run using various assumptions regarding model parameters. For reported tornadoes, when windspeed observations were not available, the AIR severe thunderstorm team mapped written descriptions of damage (available from SPC) to wind speeds and produced a Fujita-scale category. Hail and wind events were handled in similar fashion. Hail impact energy, which is a function of the reported hailstone size, the number of hailstones per square meter, and wind speed, was again assumed to be the average for the state. Averages by state were used for straight-line wind speeds except where wind speeds were explicitly reported. 2002 AIR Worldwide Corporation SPECIAL REPORT 4

IV. Modeled Results As a result of the analysis, AIR estimated, and posted on its ALERT website, that the expected total loss from the storm system, April 27-28, was close to $600 million. Two additional scenarios were posted to reflect the uncertainty in the data. These ranged from a low of $400 million to a high of $800 million. By comparison, Property Claim Service s estimate of insured property damage as of May 16 totaled $700 million. The PCS estimate defined the catastrophe event as lasting from April 27 to May 3, four days longer than the AIR analysis. Modeled losses from April 27-28 severe thunderstorm event as posted on the ALERT website May 3, 2002 The map below shows AIR modeled losses by state. 2002 AIR Worldwide Corporation SPECIAL REPORT 5

AIR Expected Losses by State V. Summary AIR posted loss estimates in real time for a severe thunderstorm event that swept across 26 states in late April, 2002. This is the first time that loss estimates have been provided so soon after the occurrence of an event of this type. AIR s severe thunderstorm modeling team analyzed early reports and estimated an expected loss of close to $600 million. This agrees well with the $700 million estimate, based on surveys of actual insurance claims, issued on May 16 by PCS. This severe thunderstorm system was unusual in that it generated a powerful F4 (borderline F5) tornado in eastern Maryland. Otherwise, losses produced by this macroevent were not unusually high. The modeled return period for a $600-$700 loss from an occurrence of a severe thunderstorm macroevent is roughly 1.6 years. The estimated long term average annual maximum occurrence loss from severe thunderstorm events is about $1.2 billion. Obtaining reliable catastrophe loss information quickly as an actual event unfolds has become increasingly important for insurers, reinsurers, and investors. Companies may need to respond to questions from investors about the size of their losses in the immediate aftermath of a significant event. This, coupled with the opportunities available for hedging against events in real time, makes access to timely information regarding potential catastrophe losses exceedingly valuable. AIR clients were able to model their potential losses using event scenarios prepared by AIR within days of the occurrence. More than 50 client companies logged in to the ALERT website and downloaded event sets for further analysis. 2002 AIR Worldwide Corporation SPECIAL REPORT 6

VI. About AIR Worldwide AIR Worldwide (AIR) pioneered the development and application of catastrophe loss estimation technology a technology that provided companies, for the first time, valuable tools to assess and manage their catastrophe risk. Today, AIR provides clients with a full suite of integrated products for underwriting, pricing, portfolio management, risk transfer and financing. AIR has developed models to estimate potential catastrophe losses from all major natural hazards, including hurricanes, earthquakes, extratropical cyclones, tornadoes, hailstorms and flood, for more than 35 countries throughout North and South America, the Caribbean, Europe and the Pacific Rim. AIR is also a leading provider of weather risk management services. In response to the increasing demand for accurate weather and climate information for evaluating new weather risk management opportunities, AIR provides weather data and climate forecasts for the weather risk management market around the world. AIR has created a broad range of software solutions to serve the diverse needs of our clients, among them, CLASIC/2, CATRADER, and CATMAP /2. Web-based applications include ALERT, AIRWeather ClimateCast and AIRProfiler. To find out more about AIR products and services, please visit our website at www.air-worldwide.com. For more details on how your company can take advantage of this leading edge technology, please contact: AIR Worldwide Corporation 101 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199 617.267.6645 2002 AIR Worldwide Corporation SPECIAL REPORT 7