SOLUTIONS: Homework: Week 2 Thermoelectricity from Atoms to Systems Mark Lundstrom, nanohub- U Fall 2013

Similar documents
Mark Lundstrom 2/10/2013. SOLUTIONS: ECE 606 Homework Week 5 Mark Lundstrom Purdue University (corrected 3/26/13)

Lecture 11: Coupled Current Equations: and thermoelectric devices

SOLUTIONS: ECE 606 Exam 2: Spring 2013 February 14, 2013 Mark Lundstrom Purdue University

Low Bias Transport in Graphene: An Introduction

On the best bandstructure for thermoelectric performance: A Landauer perspective

Lessons from Nanoscience: A Lecture Note Series

( )! N D ( x) ) and equilibrium

Influence of Dimensionality on Thermoelectric Device Performance

EECS130 Integrated Circuit Devices

Physics 1502: Lecture 8 Today s Agenda. Today s Topic :

Electrical Resistance

Energy Bands & Carrier Densities

Carrier transport: Drift and Diffusion

ECE-305: Spring Carrier Action: II. Pierret, Semiconductor Device Fundamentals (SDF) pp

Hall Effect Measurements on New Thermoelectric Materials

Semiconductor Devices and Circuits Fall Midterm Exam. Instructor: Dr. Dietmar Knipp, Professor of Electrical Engineering. Name: Mat. -Nr.

Thermal Transport at the Nanoscale: A Fourier s Law vs. Phonon Boltzmann Equation Study

Thermal Transport at the Nanoscale: A Fourier s Law vs. Phonon Boltzmann Equation Study

On the Calculation of Lorenz Numbers for Complex Thermoelectric Materials

Session 6: Solid State Physics. Diode

Introduction of Nano Science and Tech. Thermal and Electric Conduction in Nanostructures. Nick Fang

n i exp E g 2kT lnn i E g 2kT

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. EECS 130 Professor Ali Javey Fall 2006

Appendix 1: List of symbols

Mat E 272 Lecture 25: Electrical properties of materials

Homework Week 3: Nanoscale and macroscale characterization Thermoelectricity: From Atoms to Systems

Lecture 1 Nanoscale MOSFETs. Course Structure Basic Concepts (1-38)

Chapter 12: Semiconductors

EXPERIMENT 14. HALL EFFECT AND RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENTS IN DOPED GAAS 1. Hall Effect and Resistivity Measurements in Doped GaAs

Chapter 5. Carrier Transport Phenomena

THERMOELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF n-type Bi 2 Te 3 WIRES. I.M. Bejenari, V.G. Kantser

The BTE with a High B-field

Simple Theory of the Ballistic Nanotransistor

Lecture 1. OUTLINE Basic Semiconductor Physics. Reading: Chapter 2.1. Semiconductors Intrinsic (undoped) silicon Doping Carrier concentrations

Thermal Sensors and Actuators

QUANTUM SIMULATION OF NANOCRYSTALLINE COMPOSITE THERMOELECTRIC PROPERTIES

EECS130 Integrated Circuit Devices

Lecture 3 Semiconductor Physics (II) Carrier Transport

Key Words Student Paper, Electrical Engineering

Lecture 8 - Carrier Drift and Diffusion (cont.) September 21, 2001

Lab Week 6. Quiz #3 Voltage Divider Homework P11, P12 Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) KCL + KVL Module Report tips

Lecture 4 - PN Junction and MOS Electrostatics (I) Semiconductor Electrostatics in Thermal Equilibrium September 20, 2005

The Semiconductor in Equilibrium

PH575 Spring 2014 Lecture #10 Electrons, Holes; Effective mass Sutton Ch. 4 pp 80 -> 92; Kittel Ch 8 pp ; AM p. <-225->

Lecture 17: Semiconductors - continued (Kittel Ch. 8)

Transport Properties of Semiconductors

Lecture 7 - Carrier Drift and Diffusion (cont.) February 20, Non-uniformly doped semiconductor in thermal equilibrium

Supplementary Information

Clean Energy: Thermoelectrics and Photovoltaics. Akram Boukai Ph.D.

ECE 606 Homework Week 7 Mark Lundstrom Purdue University (revised 2/25/13) e E i! E T

Thermoelectric and electrical properties of Si-doped InSb thin films. University, Japan

Solid State Device Fundamentals

General Physics (PHY 2140)

Topic 11-3: Fermi Levels of Intrinsic Semiconductors with Effective Mass in Temperature

Nanoscience and Molecular Engineering (ChemE 498A) Semiconductor Nano Devices

Solar Cell Physics: recombination and generation

SENSORS and TRANSDUCERS

Subbands and quantum confinement

Physics 169. Luis anchordoqui. Kitt Peak National Observatory. Wednesday, March 8, 17

Electrostatics of Nanowire Transistors

Electric Field--Definition. Brownian motion and drift velocity

Electrical Characteristics of MOS Devices

Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting with Carbon Nanotube Systems

Dr. Todd Satogata (ODU/Jefferson Lab) Wednesday, February

Fundamental Limitations of Solar Cells

ECE 442. Spring, Lecture -2

Solid State Device Fundamentals

Thermionic power generation at high temperatures using SiGe/ Si superlattices

Thermoelectricity: From Atoms to Systems

Semiconductor Physics Problems 2015

Two-Dimensional Quantum-Mechanical Modeling for Strained Silicon Channel of Double-Gate MOSFET

Lecture 2. Introduction to semiconductors Structures and characteristics in semiconductors

V BI. H. Föll: kiel.de/matwis/amat/semi_en/kap_2/backbone/r2_2_4.html. different electrochemical potentials (i.e.

Observation of the Hall Effect, and measurement of the Hall constant of a few semi-conductors and metals samples.

Homework 1 solutions

Nernst effect. Makariy A. Tanatar 590B. November 21, Nernst effect

Comparison of solid-state thermionic refrigeration with thermoelectric refrigeration

Landauer vs. Boltzmann and Full Dispersion vs. Debye Model Evaluation of Lattice Thermal Conductivity

Computational Study of the Electronic Performance of Cross-Plane Superlattice Peltier Devices

Lecture 4 - PN Junction and MOS Electrostatics (I) Semiconductor Electrostatics in Thermal Equilibrium. February 13, 2003

Carriers Concentration, Current & Hall Effect in Semiconductors. Prof.P. Ravindran, Department of Physics, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India

Semiconductor Detectors

Lecture 7: Extrinsic semiconductors - Fermi level

ET3034TUx Utilization of band gap energy

Introduction to Computer Engineering ECE 203

Semiconductor Physics and Devices

EECS143 Microfabrication Technology

Calculating Band Structure

Semiconductor Device Physics

Chap. 1 (Introduction), Chap. 2 (Components and Circuits)

Nano Structured Composite Materials for Thermoelectric Applications. Ewha Womans University. April 5, 2010

Supplementary Information for On-chip cooling by superlattice based thin-film thermoelectrics

EE143 Fall 2016 Microfabrication Technologies. Evolution of Devices

Review 5 unknowns: n(x,t), p(x,t), J e. Doping profile problems Electrostatic potential Poisson's equation. (x,t), J h

Lecture 3: Transistor as an thermonic switch

Lecture 10 Charge Carrier Mobility

Carrier Concentrations in Degenerate Semiconductors Having Band Gap Narrowing

The BTE with a B-field: Simple Approach

Ch/ChE 140a Problem Set #3 2007/2008 SHOW ALL OF YOUR WORK! (190 Points Total) Due Thursday, February 28 th, 2008

RELATING ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE TO THERMOELECTRIC DEVICE PERFORMANCE. Shuaib Salamat, Abhijeet Paul, Mehdi Salmani-Jelodar, Changwook Jeong,

Transcription:

SOLUIONS: Homework: Week hermoelectricity from Atoms to Systems Mark Lundstrom, nanohub- U all 13 here are seven HW questions below. his homework will be graded in multiple choice format no partial credit. Doing the homework before the solutions and tutorial are posted is a great way to test your understanding of the material covered. Some problems may be challenging, but give them a try, and review the tutorial and solutions later. 1) We have discussed the coupled current equations for 3D electrons: E x ρj x + S d dx V/m J Qx π J x ( +κ L ) d dx W/m Consider a nanowire with 1D electrons. Instead of the current density, J x, in A/m, we use the current, I, in A, and instead of the heat current density, J Qx, in W/m, we use the heat current, I Q, in W. Deduce the units of each of the four 1D transport coefficients. e he units of ρ 1D, S 1D, π 1D, and κ 1D, are: Solution: a) Ω-m,V/K,V,W/ ( m-k) b) Ω,V/K,V,W/K c) Ω/m,V/K,V,W-m/K d) Ω/m,V-K,V-K,W/( m-k) e) Ω-m,V/K,V K,W-K/m he coupled current equations in 1D are: E x ρi x + S d dx V/m I Qx π I x ( +κ L ) d dx W (i) (ii) In terms of units, we can write these equations as: nanohub- U all 13 1

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) V V/m A-m A + V K K m W ( V)A + W-m K K m (iii) (iv) So, ρ Ω m S V K π V κ W-m K Answer is c) Ω/m,V/K,V,W-m/K ) he expression for the short circuit (electronic) thermal conductivity is: E E κ σ ( E)dE q where σ ( E), the differential conductivity, is given by σ ( E) q h λ E f M ( E) A E. Evaluate this expression assuming that the ermi level is located above the middle of the gap, so that only the conduction band need be considered. You may assume that the mean- free- path for backscattering is independent of energy, λ E λ, and parabolic energy bands so that in 3D: M ( E) A m* ( E E π C ) H ( E E C ), where H ( E E C ) is the Heaviside step function. Your answer should be expressed in terms of ermi- Dirac integrals. or a tutorial on ermi- Dirac integrals see: Notes on ermi- Dirac Integrals, 3 rd Ed. http://nanohub.org/resources/5475/ nanohub- U all 13

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) he expression for the short- circuit thermal conductivity of 3D electrons in a semiconductor with parabolic energy bands in terms of the normalized ermi energy, ( E E C ) k B is: a) κ k B q { } b) κ k B q 1 { ( ) } c) κ k B 1 q ( ) η d) κ k B q q h λ m * k B π 6 e) κ k B q q h λ m * k B π 6 { ( ) + η ( )} { ( ) 4 1 ( ) + η ( )} Solution: κ E E q σ ( E)dE Substituting in for the differential conductivity, we find: E E κ q q h λ M E ( A) f E de, and then for the number of channels: E E κ q q h λ m * E E ( π C ) f E de. Pull the constants out front: 1 q κ q h λ m * π ( E E ) ( E E C ) f E de. (i) nanohub- U all 13 3

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) Work on the integral first: 1 q κ q h λ m * π I (ii) I ( E E ) ( E E C ) f E de. Add and subtract, E C : I ( E E C + E C E ) ( E E C ) f E de. Now change variables: ( η E E C ) k B ( E E C ) k B de k dη B 4 ( η ) η f I k B I k B 4 η η + I k B E dη η f E dη 4 η 3 f E dη η η f E dη + η η f E dη 4 I k B 3 I k B η 3 f E dη E η 3 f η dη η η f dη + E η f dη + η f dη η f dη nanohub- U all 13 4

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) 3 I k B Γ( 4) η 3 Γ( 3) η + Γ( ) η 1 3 6 ( ) 4 1 ( ) + η ( ) I k B. Now insert this result in (ii) above to find: 1 q κ q h λ m * π k B 3 6 ( ) 4 1 ( ) + η ( ) κ k B q he answer is e). q h λ m * k B π 6 { ( ) 4 1 ( ) + η ( )} Please see the Appendix of Near- Equilibrium ransport: undamentals and Applications, by Lundstrom and Jeong, for a list transport coefficients worked out for 1D, D, and 3D conductors. his is eqn. (A34). Additional exercise for those who are interested: Assume that the mean- free- path is energy- dependent according to λ ( E E C ) k B λ E r. Work out the analytical expression and explain physically why r > increases the magnitude of the Seebeck coefficient. nanohub- U all 13 5

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) 3) In Lecture we worked out the approximate values of the four thermoelectric transport coefficients for lightly doped n- type Ge. or practical E devices, the material would be doped so that E E C. Work out the four thermoelectric transport coefficients for n- type Ge doped at N D 1 19 cm -3. You may assume that 3 K, that the dopants are fully ionized, and that the mean- free- path for backscattering, λ, is independent of energy. Use the material parameters presented in Lecture, but use a mobility of µ n 33 cm /V-s (from http://www.ioffe.ru/sva/nsm/semicond/ge/igs/3.gif. You may assume non- degenerate carrier statistics (but realize that this assumption may not well- justified for E E C, which is the case here, so we will only obtain estimates). he approximate values of λ, ρ, S, π, and, are: a) 11 nm.19 Ohm- cm, - 175 µv/k, -.5 V,.4 W/(m- K) b) 11 nm.19 Ohm- cm, - 175 µv/k, -.5 V,.4 W/(m- K) c) 11 nm.19 Ohm- cm, - 175 µv/k, -.5 V,.4 W/(m- K) d) 33 nm.19 Ohm- cm, - 175 µv/k, -.5 V,.4 W/(m- K) e) 33 nm.19 Ohm- cm, - 175 µv/k, -.5 V,.4 W/(m- K) Solution: rom Lecture : υ k B π m * 1.55 1 7 cm/s D n k B q µ n 8.6cm s D n υ λ cm /s λ D n υ 11.1 1 7 cm λ 11.1 nm ρ 1 ( n qµ n ) 1 ( 1 19 1.6 1 19 33).19 Ω-cm ρ.19 Ω-cm S k B E c E q k B + δ n ( E c E ) k B ln( N C n ) N C 1.4 1 19 cm -3 nanohub- U all 13 6

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) k B ln 1.4 1 19 E c E S k B E c E q k B S 175µV/K ( 1 ) 19 3.9 1 δ n + δ n 86 µv/k { 3.9 1 + } 175µV/K π S.5 V σ L L ρ L ( k B q) (We are using the factor of because we assume nondegenerate carrier statistics.) ( q ) k B ρ.4 W/m-K.4 W/m-K Answer is c). 4) Perhaps we should use ermi- Dirac statistics for thermoelectric calculations when E E c. Repeat problem 3), but this time use ermi- Dirac statistics to determine the approximate values of λ, ρ, S, π, and. You might find it useful to know that σ 3D q h λ g V m * k B π and S k B 1 q 1 ( ) a) 11 nm.19 Ohm- cm, - 175 µv/k, -.5 V,.4 W/(m- K) b) 11 nm.19 Ohm- cm, - 175 µv/k, -.5 V,.4 W/(m- K) c) 11 nm.19 Ohm- cm, - 175 µv/k, -.5 V,.4 W/(m- K) d) 13 nm.19 Ohm- cm, - 186 µv/k, -.6 V,.4 W/(m- K) e) 13 nm.19 Ohm- cm, - 186 µv/k, -.6 V,.4 W/(m- K) nanohub- U all 13 7

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) Solution: he conductivity does not change from prob. 3): σ 3D 1 ρ 1.19 56 S/cm rom: σ 3D q h λ m * k B π conductivity:, we can solve for the MP in terms of the λ q h σ 3D g V m * k B π o proceed, we must find using: n 1 19 N C 1/ ( ) 1.4 1 19 1/ 1 1 19 1/ 1.4 1 19 1.96 1/.97 (computed with the iphone app or with the nanohub tool: http://nanohub.org/resources/11396) λ q h σ 3D g V m * k B π 5.6 1 4 S/m 7.71 1 ( 5 ).97 6.37 1 16.13 1 7 m where we used the distribution of modes effective mass, m * 1.18m. or a discussion of distribution of modes (DOM) effective mass, see: Changwook Jeong, Raseong Kim, Mathieu Luisier, Supriyo Datta, and Mark Lundstrom, On Landauer vs. Boltzmann and ull Band vs. Effective Mass Evaluation of hermoelectric ransport Coefficients, J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 17, 377, 1. λ 13 nm a bit longer than for MB statistics nanohub- U all 13 8

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) ρ.19 Ω-cm same as before S k B 1 q S 186 µv/k ( ) 86 1.97 1 6.97.97 186µV/K π S.6 V σ L L ρ L π 3 k B q (We are using the fully degenerate Lorenz number, for simplicity.) π 3 k q B ρ.4 W-m/K.4 W-m/K Answer is d). 5) We have discussed two different electronic thermal conductivities one measured under short circuit conditions, κ, and one measured under open circuit conditions,. he two are related according to: κ σ S Using the estimated E transport coefficients for Ge doped such that E E C (from problem 4) deduce the ratio, κ. or this example, the ratio, κ, is closest to: a). b).9 c) 1.3 d).4 e) 5.5 nanohub- U all 13 9

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) Solution: he relation between the two electronic thermal conductivities is: κ σ S κ + σ S Use numbers from problem 4).4 W-m/K σ 1 ρ 1.19 56 S/cm 5.6 1 4 S/m S 186 µv/k -1.86 1 4 V/K κ + σ S.4 + 3 5.6 1 4 ( 1.86 1 ) 4.4 +.55 κ.95 W-m/K κ.38 he answer is d). 6) Using the results of prob. 4), estimate the thermoelectric OM, Z for n- type Ge at 3 K. You may assume that κ L 58 W/m-K. a) Z.1 b) Z.1 c) Z.1 d) Z 1. e) Z 1.8 nanohub- U all 13 1

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) Solution:.4 W-m/K σ 1 ρ 1.19 56 S/cm 5.6 1 4 S/m S 186 µv/k -1.86 1 4 V/K Z ( 1.86 1 4 ) 5.4 1 4 3.1 Z.1.4 + 58 he answer is b). 7) he expressions for conductance and Seebeck coefficient are: G G E de (1) G ( E) q h λ( E) L M E f E () S ( E E ) G ( E)dE q G ( E)dE (3) Assuming 1D electrons, parabolic energy bands, and an energy- independent mean- free- path, λ E λ, eqns. (1) (3) can be evaluated to find (Lundstrom and Jeong, Near- Equilibrium ransport, Appendix, eqn. (A.5), World Scientific, 13) G 1D q h S 1D k B q where λ ( ) L 1 1 ( E E C ) k B. nanohub- U all 13 11

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) or energy independent scattering, the optimum location of the ermi level for maximum power factor is ˆ. Assuming 3D electrons, parabolic energy bands, and an energy- independent mean- free- path, λ E λ, eqns. (1) (3) can be evaluated to find (Lundstrom and Jeong, Near- Equilibrium ransport, Appendix, eqn. (A.34), World Scientific, 13) G 3D A q h S 3D k B q λ L m * k B π 1 or energy independent scattering, the optimum location of the ermi level for a 3D material is ˆ +.668. Assuming 3 K, m * m, λ 1 nm, and L 1 cm, compare the power factors in 1D and 3D for a 1 cm cross- sectional area. Determine how many 1D nanowires would need to be placed in this 1 cm area to equal the power factor of the 3D material. he center- to center spacing of the nanowires is: Solution: a).1 nm b) 1.5 nm c).4 nm d) 5.7 nm e) 1.3 nm he optimum power factor of the nanowire is: 1D q λ P max h L 1 k B +1.14 q 1 he optimum power factor of the 3D material is: 3D q λ P max A h L m * k B π.668 k B 1.668 q.668.668 nanohub- U all 13 1

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) he number of nanowires needed to give the same power factor as the 3D structure is 3D N P max 1D P max A q h λ L q h m * k B π.668 λ L 1 k B k B.668 +1.14 1.668 q.668 q 1 3D N P max 1D P max A m* k B.668 π 1.668 ( ) +1.14 1.668.668 1 A 1 cm 1 4 m m * k B π 5.39 116 m - 1.8.775 1 1 1.49.43 1 1.668 1.668 1 1.49 N 1 4 5.39 1 16 1.8.4 1.8.668.78.4 +1.14 If these are placed in an N x N array, the on a side we have 1.7 1 13 nanowires N 1.7 1 13 4.15 1 6 nanowires Since these are placed in a 1 cm by 1 cm square, the nanowires must be placed a distance d 1 N 1.4 nm 6 4.15 1 nanohub- U all 13 13

Homework: Week hermoelectric Materials and Devices (continued) he answer is c). Even though a nanowire is inherently more efficient than a bulk thermoelectric (on a per channel basis), they must be packed very closely just to equal the power factor of the bulk device. or more discussion of this topic, see: Raseong Kim, Supriyo Datta, and Mark S. Lundstrom, Influence of dimensionality on thermoelectric device performance, J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 15, 3456, 9. End of homework assignment. his assignment contains 7 questions. nanohub- U all 13 14