Implementation of Laterally Loaded Piles in Multi-Layer Soils

Similar documents
Evaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil

Finite Element analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles on Sloping Ground

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Monopile design

PILE SOIL INTERACTION MOMENT AREA METHOD

EFFECT OF SOIL TYPE LOCATION ON THE LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE

Numerical study of group effects for pile groups in sands

CHAPTER 8 ANALYSES OF THE LATERAL LOAD TESTS AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Discussion: behaviour of jacked and driven piles in sandy soil

Investigation of Pile- Soil Interaction Subjected to Lateral Loads in Layered Soils

Lecture 7. Pile Analysis

EVALUATION OF BENDING LOAD IN BATTER PILES SET IN SOFT CLAY

Sample Chapter HELICAL ANCHORS IN SAND 6.1 INTRODUCTION

Analysis of Pile Foundation Subjected to Lateral and Vertical Loads

ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED FIXED HEADED SINGLE FLOATING PILE IN MULTILAYERED SOIL USING BEF APPROACH

STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOR OF PILE GROUPS IN LIQUEFIED SOILS

THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATIONS BASED ON LRFD FOR JAPANESE HIGHWAYS

Lesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18

HORIZONTAL LOAD DISTRIBUTION WITHIN PILE GROUP IN LIQUEFIED GROUND

Evaluation of Horizontal Displacement of Long Piles Subject to Lateral Loading in Sandy Soil

Use of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in Geotechnical and Substructure Applications

Christian Linde Olsen Griffith University, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, Gold Coast Campus.

Experimental study of sand deformations during a CPT

ANALYSES OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION BASED ON VERTICAL LOAD TESTS OF DISPLACEMENT PILES

Analysis of pile foundation Simplified methods to analyse the pile foundation under lateral and vertical loads

Chapter 7: Settlement of Shallow Foundations

[5] Stress and Strain

CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY

COEFFICIENT OF DYNAMIC HORIZONTAL SUBGRADE REACTION OF PILE FOUNDATIONS ON PROBLEMATIC GROUND IN HOKKAIDO Hirofumi Fukushima 1

Gapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

PGroupN background theory

Theory of Shear Strength

Nonlinear pushover analysis for pile foundations

Calculation and analysis of internal force of piles excavation supporting. based on differential equation. Wei Wang

Small-Scale Testing of Cyclic Laterally Loaded Monopiles in Dense Saturated Sand

INDOT/Purdue Pile Driving Method for Estimation of Axial Capacity

Determine the resultant internal loadings acting on the cross section at C of the beam shown in Fig. 1 4a.

Cyclic lateral response of piles in dry sand: Effect of pile slenderness

MECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3

Flexural Behavior of Laterally Loaded Tapered Piles in Cohesive Soils

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Experimental Investigation of Steel Pipe Pile to Concrete Cap Connections

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

A study on the bearing capacity of steel pipe piles with tapered tips

Numerical analysis of pile behaviour under lateral loads in layered elastic plastic soils

FLAC3D analysis on soil moving through piles

OPTIMAL SHAKEDOWN ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED PILE WITH LIMITED RESIDUAL STRAIN ENERGY

Numerical Modeling of Lateral Response of Long Flexible Piles in Sand

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

Interpretation of Pile Integrity Test (PIT) Results

NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF SOIL-PILE-STRUCTURE INTERACTION UNDER SEISMIC LOADS

Back-Calculation of Winkler Foundation Parameters for Dynamic Analysis of Piles from Field Test Data

Understanding Dynamic Pile Testing and Driveability

Samantha Ramirez, MSE. Stress. The intensity of the internal force acting on a specific plane (area) passing through a point. F 2

Transmission Line Design Structures & Foundations TADP 549

Entrance exam Master Course

Validation of empirical formulas to derive model parameters for sands

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

Numerical Analysis of Pile Behavior under Lateral Loads in. Layered Elastic Plastic Soils

Centrifuge modelling of a laterally cyclic loaded pile

Co-author: Dr B. He Engineer, Power China Huadong Engineering Limited Corporation, China

Flexible Pavement Stress Analysis

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Sample Problem 4.2

Report No. K-TRAN: KU-10-2 FINAL REPORT November 2013

PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE LATERAL BEHAVIOR OF CAST IN DRILLED WHOLE PILES Samir A.J. Al-Jassim 1 and Rafi Mohammed Qasim 2

1 of 12. Law of Sines: Stress = E = G. Deformation due to Temperature: Δ

Experiment Instructions. Deformation of Frames

Mechanics of Materials MENG 270 Fall 2003 Exam 3 Time allowed: 90min. Q.1(a) Q.1 (b) Q.2 Q.3 Q.4 Total

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

SOLUTION 8 7. To hold lever: a+ M O = 0; F B (0.15) - 5 = 0; F B = N. Require = N N B = N 0.3. Lever,

If the solution does not follow a logical thought process, it will be assumed in error.

SOLUTION (17.3) Known: A simply supported steel shaft is connected to an electric motor with a flexible coupling.

Application of p-y approach in analyzing pile foundations in frozen ground overlying liquefiable soils

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

Clayey sand (SC)

Lateral Resistance of Piles at the Crest of Slopes in Sand

Theory of Shear Strength

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200

DETERMINATION OF EI FOR PULTRUDED GFRP SHEET PILE PANELS. Abstract

OP-023. INTERPRETATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST PILE RESULT

SELECTION OF PARAMETERS AND CALCULATION OF LATERALLY LOADED PILES BY TRADITIONAL METHODS

MTE 119 STATICS FINAL HELP SESSION REVIEW PROBLEMS PAGE 1 9 NAME & ID DATE. Example Problem P.1

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Centrifuge experiments on laterally loaded piles with wings

Additional Pile Design Considerations

EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2 Stress & Strain - Axial Loading

A Simple Algorithm for Analyzing a Piled Raft by Considering Stress Distribution

Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

Strain Measurement. Prof. Yu Qiao. Department of Structural Engineering, UCSD. Strain Measurement

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS ON THE LATERAL BEARING BEHAVIOR OF VIBRATORY-DRIVEN OPEN STEEL PIPE PILES

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION

Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology SJST R1 Ukritchon. Undrained lateral capacity of I-shaped concrete piles

Solid Mechanics Homework Answers

Free Body Diagram: Solution: The maximum load which can be safely supported by EACH of the support members is: ANS: A =0.217 in 2

STRESS. Bar. ! Stress. ! Average Normal Stress in an Axially Loaded. ! Average Shear Stress. ! Allowable Stress. ! Design of Simple Connections

Published in: Canadian Geotechnical Journal. DOI: /cgj Document Version Peer reviewed version

Experimental setup and Instrumentation

Transcription:

Implementation of Laterally Loaded Piles in Multi-Layer Soils JTRP SPR- 3261 Final SAC meeting SAC members Mir Zaheer and Keith Hoernschemeyer Purdue University

Introduction Analysis developed for the design of laterally loaded piles in multi-layer soil using energy principles (SPR 2630) Analysis validation for piles in sand Model pile lateral load tests (single piles and pile groups) Driven Preinstalled Jacked 1

Objectives Study the response of piles subjected to lateral load through a series of model pile load tests Evaluate the effect of pile installation (driven, jacked and preinstalled) on pile response Compare the model pile experimental results with results from the analysis for preinstalled model piles 2

General scope of work Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Purchase of sensors Fabrication of piles and pile caps Fabrication of jacking system Performance of model pile load tests Validation of the analysis 3

Contents Model pile testing plan Model pile testing Sample preparation Soil tank Sand pluviator Instrumented model pile Driving system Preinstallation method Jacking system Installation of piles for pile group testing Lateral loading system Comparison of test and analysis results Single piles Pile groups Summary and Conclusions 4

Model pile testing plan Model Pile Test Laterally Loaded Piles Single piles Pile groups Driven Preinstalled Jacked Driven (4 piles) 5

Model pile testing plan Pile Installation Soil Condition Relative Density Dense sand D R 90% Driven Medium dense sand D R 60% Loose sand D R 40% Single pile Group piles Preinstalled Jacked Driven Multi-layer D R 60%, 90 % Dense sand D R 90% Medium dense sand D R 60% Dense sand D R 90% Medium dense sand D R 60% Loose sand D R 40% Dense sand D R 90% Medium dense sand D R 60% Loose sand D R 40% Multi-layer D R 60%, 90 % 6

Contents Model pile testing plan Model pile testing Sample preparation Soil tank Sand pluviator Instrumented model pile Driving system Preinstallation method Jacking system Installation of piles for pile group testing Lateral loading system Comparison of test and analysis results Single piles Pile groups Summary and Conclusions 7

Soil tank Soil tank (D=2m, H=1.6m) Hammer Guide arm for pile driving (rotatable and extensible) Guide rod Reaction beam support Model pile 8

Soil tank Guide arm for pile driving Reaction beam (detachable) Open Holes for draining sand Close 9

Sand pluviator Large-scale sand pluviation system (D=2m) Gantry Hoist for adjusting height Diffuser sieves Shutter plate Soil tank 10

Sand pluviator Top of pluviator Two sieve layers Holes for sand pluviation 11

Sand pluviator Schematic view and photo of sand pluviator Chains Hoist Shutter plate Sand supply Falling sand jets Raining sand Diffuser sieves Deposited sand 12

Sample preparation Top view of pluviator Sand pluviation 13

Draining sand Draining sand after the test 14

Contents Model pile testing plan Model pile testing Sample preparation Soil tank Sand pluviator Instrumented model pile Driving system Preinstallation method Jacking system Installation of piles for pile group testing Lateral loading system Comparison of test and analysis results Single piles Pile groups Summary and Conclusions 15

Instrumented model pile Smooth steel pipe (D=3cm, L=120cm, t=0.2cm) Collected wires at pile head Closed-ended pile base 16

Instrumented model pile 22 strain gauges Closer near the base (higher load transfer rate) Load cell-shaped pile base 17

Driving System Installation of driven pile Hammer Guide Rod Pile Cap Filled soil tank 18

Preinstallation of model pile Preinstalled pile

Pile jacking system 20

Pile jacking system Max. rate = 5 cm/min Screw Rod Model Pile Motor 21

Installation of Group piles Setup Pile driving guide (Wooden Box Frame) Pile driving order 3 2 4 Piles & Steel Cap 4 1 22

Lateral loading system Pile groups Single pile 23

Contents Model pile testing plan Model pile testing Sample preparation Soil tank Sand pluviator Instrumented model pile Driving system Preinstallation method Jacking system Installation of piles for pile group testing Lateral loading system Comparison of test and analysis results Single piles Pile groups Summary and Conclusions 24

Test results: Single pile Lateral load - deflection curves (driven pile) Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.0 kn = 225 lb Dense sand Medium dense sand Loose sand Ultimate lateral loads Sand type Q lat,5%, Q lat,10% Q lat,20% corresponding to lateral pile head deflections of 5, 10 and 20 % of the pile diameter Q lat, 5% (kn) Q lat, 10% (kn) Q lat, 20% (kn) Dense 0.42 0.65 0.92 Medium dense 0.24 0.36 0.54 Loose 0.19 0.29 0.44 25

Test results: Single pile Bending moment profiles (driven pile) 1.0 kn-m = 0.738 lb-kips Dense sand (D R =91%) Medium dense sand (D R =59%) Loose sand (D R =38%) Depth (m) -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 M 0.1 kn 0.2 kn 0.3 kn 0.4 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 0.7 kn 0.8 kn 0.9 kn 1.0 kn 1.1 kn 1.2 kn Bending moment EI ( εt εc) = h Rollins et al. (1998) Depth (m) -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 ε Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 kn 0.2 kn 0.3 kn 0.4 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 0.7 kn 0.8 kn 0.9 kn T : tensile strain ε c : compressive strain h: horizontal distance between gauges EI: bending stiffness of pile Depth (m) -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 kn 0.2 kn 0.3 kn 0.4 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 26

Test results: Single pile Lateral load - deflection curves (jacked pile) 0 Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Dense sand Medium dense sand Loose sand Sand type Q lat, 5% (kn) Q lat, 10% (kn) Q lat, 20% (kn) Dense 0.51 0.71 0.97 Medium dense 0.32 0.42 0.59 Loose 0.21 0.31 0.47 1.0 kn = 225 lb 27

Test results: Single pile Bending moment profiles (jacked pile) Dense sand (D R =91%) Medium dense sand (D R =59%) Loose sand (D R =38%) Bending Moment (kn-m) Bending Moment (kn-m) Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-0.1-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-0.1-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 Depth (m) 0.4 0.5 0.6 Depth (m) 0.4 0.5 0.6 Depth (m) 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.2 kn 0.3 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 0.7 kn 0.9 kn 1.0 kn 1.1 kn 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.2 kn 0.3 kn 0.4 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 0.7 kn 0.8 kn 0.9 kn 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.1 kn 0.2 kn 0.3 kn 0.4 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 1.0 kn-m = 0.738 lb-kips 28

Test results: Single pile Lateral load - deflection curves (preinstalled pile) 0 Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Dense sand Medium dense sand Sand type Q lat, 5% (kn) Q lat, 10% (kn) Q lat, 20% (kn) Dense 0.35 0.52 0.73 Medium dense 0.22 0.35 0.52 1.0 kn = 225 lb 29

Test results: Single pile Bending moment profiles (preinstalled pile) Dense sand (D R =91%) Medium dense sand (D R =59%) -0.1 Moment (kn-m) -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-0.1 Moment (kn-m) -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 Depth (m) 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Depth (m) 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.1 kn 0.2 kn 0.3 kn 0.4 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 0.7 kn 0.8 kn 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.1 kn 0.2 kn 0.3 kn 0.4 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 0.7 kn 0.8 kn 1.0 kn-m = 0.738 lb-kips 30

Test results: Single pile Load-deflection curves and bending moment profiles (Multi-layer soils) 0 Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0-0.1 Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Multi layer Depth (m) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.1 kn 0.2 kn 0.4 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 0.7 kn 0.9 kn Sand type Q lat, 5% (kn) Q lat, 10% (kn) Q lat, 20% (kn) Medium dense sand Soil Tank Multi layer 0.28 0.41 0.61 Dense sand 31

Effect of pile installation method Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 0 Dense sand Q lat,10% (preinstalled piles) = 73% of Q lat,10% (jacked piles) Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Medium dense Driven pile (Dense) Jacked pile (Dense) Preinstalled pile (Dense) Driven pile (Medium Dense) Jacked pile (Medium Dense) Preinstalled pile (Medium Dense) Dense Installation Method Q lat, 10% (kn) Jacked 0.71 Driven 0.65 Preinstalled 0.52 Medium dense sand Q lat,10% (preinstalled piles) = 84% of Q lat,10% (jacked piles) Installation Method Q lat, 10% (kn) Jacked 0.42 Driven 0.36 1.0 kn = 225 lb Preinstalled 0.35 32

Comparison of Result with Predictions Comparison of predictions (PYGMY, present analysis) with measurements from model piles driven in dense, medium dense, and loose sand Dense sand (D R =91%) Medium dense sand (D R =59%) Loose sand (D R =38%) Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Predicted (PYGMY) Measured (Driven) present analysis Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 0 Predicted (PYGMY) 2 Measured (Driven) 4 6 8 10 12 14 present analysis Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Measured Predicted (PYGMY) present analysis 1.0 kn = 225 lb 33

Comparison of Result with Predictions Comparison of predicted and measured bending moment profiles for model piles driven in dense sand Bending Moment (kn-m) 0.8-0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.7 Depth (m) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Applied lateral load (kn) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Predicted Measured 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Pred_0.1 kn Pred_0.2 kn Pred_0.3 kn Pred_0.4 kn Mead_0.1 kn Mead_0.2 kn Mead_0.3 kn Mead_0.4 kn 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 Max. Moment (kn-m) 1.0 kn-m = 0.738 lb-kips 34

Comparison of Results with PYGMY Comparison of predicted and measured bending moment profiles for model piles driven in dense sand -0.2 Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.4 1.2 Depth (m) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Mead_0.2kN Mead_0.4kN Mead_0.6kN Mead_0.8kN Mead_1.0kN Pred_0.2kN Pred_0.4kN Pred_0.6kN Pred_0.8kN Pred_1.0kN Applied Lateral Load (kn) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Measured Predicted 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Max. Moment (kn-m) 1.0 kn-m = 0.738 lb-kips 35

Comparison of Results Comparison of predictions with measurements from model piles driven and preinstalled in dense, medium dense Dense sand (D R =91%) Medium dense sand (D R =59%) Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Predicted (PYGMY) Measured (Driven) present analysis Measured (Preinstalled) Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Predicted (PYGMY) Measured (Driven) present analysis Measured (Preinstalled) 36

Input parameters (present analysis) Input parameters for the model pile Length (m) 1.2 Diameter / width (m) 0.03 Pile modulus (GPa) 210 Input parameters for the soil Critical-state friction angle (deg.) 32.8 Max. void ratio (e max ) 0.78 Min. void ratio (e min ) 0.47 Coefficient of earth pressure 0.4 Model f-g model Suggested f and g (Lee and Salgado, 2000) D R (%) f g 30 0.98 0.17 50 0.97 0.2 70 0.96 0.23 90 0.95 0.26 37

Input parameters (PYGMY) PYGMY input parameters for the model pile Pile property Input value Length (m) 1.2 Diameter / width (m) 0.03 Bending stiffness of pile, E p I p (kn m 2 ) 3.862 Plastic moment (kn m) 0.5 No. of elements 30 PYGMY input parameters for the soil Soil property Dense sand Medium dense sand Loose sand Peak friction angle (deg.) 44 39 36 Initial stiffness gradient (kpa/m) 82,000 34,000 12,000 Effective unit weight (kn/m 3 ) 17.34 16.27 15.64 No. of soil layers 1 1 1 38

p-y curve (PYGMY) Sand: API criterion (1993) p k x y = A pu tanh A pu B p : lateral pressure A: factor to account for static or cyclic loading A = 0.9 where equilibrium has been reached under cyclic loading A= (0.3-0.8 x/ B) 0.9 for static loading pu = fultimate bearing pressure at the current depth, x k = gradient of initial modulus of subgrade reaction with depth (kpa/m) y = lateral displacement x = depth below surface B = pile diameter 39

p-y curves (PYGMY) predicted p-y curves (dense sand) 40

Contents Model pile testing plan Model pile testing Sample preparation Soil tank Sand pluviator Instrumented model pile Driving system Preinstallation method Jacking system Installation of piles for pile group testing Lateral loading system Comparison of test and analysis results Single piles Pile groups Summary and Conclusions 41

Group piles: Dense sand (D R =90%) Lateral deflection of pile head (4 piles, 3B spacing) Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Single pile Pile group 1.0 kn = 225 lb Lateral deflection = 5%, 10%, 20% of the pile diameter Q lat, 5% = 0.91 kn Q lat, 10% = 1.59 kn Q lat, 20% = 2.25 kn 42

Group piles: Dense sand (D R =90%) Distribution of lateral load Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Trailing Pile Leading Pile 14 1.0 kn = 225 lb Q h 2cm For lateral load Pile top 4 strain gauges The difference in the bending moments divided by the distance between the strain gauges is equal to the lateral load in the pile 43

Group piles: Dense sand (D R =90%) Bending moment of leading and trailing piles -0.2-0.1 Distribution of bending moments of trailing piles 0.0 0.1 Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 Distribution of bending moments of leading piles -0.2-0.1 0.0 0.1 Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 Group piles 0.2 0.2 Depth (m) 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.5 kn 0.9 kn 1.3 kn 1.6 kn 1.9 kn 2.2 kn 2.5 kn 2.9 kn 3.2 kn Depth (m) 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.5 kn 0.9 kn 1.3 kn 1.6 kn 1.9 kn 2.2 kn 2.5 kn 2.9 kn 3.2 kn Q h Trailing Row Leading Row 1.0 kn-m = 0.738 lb-kips 44

Group piles: Dense sand (D R =90%) Measured p-multipliers and distribution of lateral load 1.6 Single pile Lateral Load (kn) 1.2 0.8 Leading pile Trailing pile Measured p-multipliers 0.4 Lateral deflection Leading Pile Trailing Pile 5 % of B 0.76 0.59 0.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 10 % of B 0.74 0.58 20 % of B 0.82 0.63 1.0 kn = 225 lb 45

Group piles: Medium dense sand (D R =60%) Lateral deflection of pile head (4 piles, 3B spacing) 0 Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Single pile Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1.0 kn = 225 lb Pile group Lateral deflection = 5%, 10%, 20% of the pile diameter Q lat, 5% = 0.60 kn Q lat, 10% = 1.20 kn Q lat, 20% = 1.56 kn 46

Group piles: Medium dense sand (D R =60%) Bending moment of leading and trailing piles Depth (m) -0.2-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Distribution of bending moments of trailing piles Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.2 kn 0.4 kn 0.6 kn 0.8 kn 1.0 kn 1.2 kn 1.4 kn 1.6 kn 2.0 kn Depth (m) Distribution of bending moments of leading piles -0.2-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.2 kn 0.4 kn 0.6 kn 0.8 kn 1.0 kn 1.2 kn 1.4 kn 1.6 kn 2.0 kn 1.0 kn-m = 0.738 lb-kips 47

Group piles: Medium dense sand (D R =60%) Measured p-multipliers and distribution of lateral load 1.6 Single pile Lateral Load (kn) 1.2 0.8 Leading pile Trailing pile Measured p-multipliers 0.4 0.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) Lateral deflection Leading Pile Trailing Pile 5 % of B 0.70 0.60 10 % of B 0.68 0.59 20 % of B 0.82 0.71 1.0 kn = 225 lb 48

Group piles: Loose sand (D R =40%) Lateral deflection of pile head (4 piles, 3B spacing) 0 Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Single pile Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1.0 kn = 225 lb Pile group Lateral deflection = 5%, 10%, 20% of the pile diameter Q lat, 5% = 0.47 kn Q lat, 10% = 0.80 kn Q lat, 20% = 1.23 kn 49

Group piles: Loose sand (D R =40%) Bending Moment of leading and trailing piles Distribution of bending moments of trailing piles Distribution of bending moments of leading piles Depth (m) -0.2-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.2 kn 0.4 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 0.8 kn 1.0 kn 1.2 kn 1.6 kn 1.8 kn Depth (m) -0.2-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.2 kn 0.4 kn 0.5 kn 0.6 kn 0.8 kn 1.0 kn 1.2 kn 1.6 kn 1.8 kn 1.0 kn-m = 0.738 lb-kips 50

Group piles: Loose sand (D R =40%) Measured p-multipliers and distribution of lateral load 1.6 Single pile Lateral Load (kn) 1.2 0.8 Leading pile Trailing pile Measured p-multipliers 0.4 0.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) Lateral deflection Leading Pile Trailing Pile 5 % of B 0.68 0.59 10 % of B 0.76 0.65 20 % of B 0.80 0.69 51

Group piles: two-layer sand sample Lateral deflection of pile head (4 piles, 3B spacing) Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Lateral Load (kn) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Single Pile group 1.0 kn = 225 lb Medium dense sand Dense sand Lateral deflection = 5%, 10%, 20% of the pile diameter Q lat, 5% = 0.62 kn Q lat, 10% = 1.21 kn Q lat, 20% = 1.82 kn Soil Tank 52

Group piles: two-layer sand sample Bending Moment of leading and trailing piles -0.2-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 Distribution of bending moments of trailing piles Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3-0.2-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 Distribution of bending moments of leading piles Bending Moment (kn-m) -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 Depth (m) 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.2 kn 0.4 kn 0.6 kn 0.8 kn 1.2 kn 1.4 kn 1.6 kn 2.0 kn 2.4 kn Depth (m) 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.2 kn 0.4 kn 0.6 kn 0.8 kn 1.2 kn 1.4 kn 1.6 kn 2.0 kn 2.4 kn 1.0 kn-m = 0.738 lb-kips 53

Group piles: two-layer sand sample Measured p-multipliers and distribution of lateral load 1.6 Single pile Lateral Load (kn) 1.2 0.8 Leading pile Trailing pile Measured p-multipliers 0.4 0.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (mm) Lateral deflection Leading Pile Trailing Pile 5 % of B 0.63 0.49 10 % of B 0.71 0.55 20 % of B 0.84 0.65 1.0 kn = 225 lb 54

Group piles: p-multipliers p-multipliers f - p-y relationship for single pile - Reduction in p values for each pile in the group by using f Reese et al (2006) f i β β ij ij : n p = β j= 1 ij interaction coefficients (pile i and pile j) = 1 if i = j 55

Group piles: p-multipliers leading offset pile S trailing offset pile Q h T i θ L spil, spit, spis : S center-to-center spacing B : pile diameter β β β il it it 0.38 spil = 0.48 1 B 0.26 spit = 0.7 1 B 0.34 spis = 0.64 1 B for a leading pile for a trailing pile for a side-by-side pile β = β cos θ + β sin θ 2 2 2 2 iθ il is for leading offset pile β = β cos θ + β sin θ 2 2 2 2 iθ it is for trailing offset pile 56

Group piles: p-multipliers for a leading pile β 12 s pil 0.38 0.38 0.09 = 0.48 = 0.48 = 0.72 B 0.03 for a side-by-side pile β 13 s pit 0.34 0.34 0.09 = 0.64 = 0.64 = 0.92 B 0.03 for leading offset pile 1 2 Q h 3 4 4 piles, 3B spacing (=0.09m) β = β cos θ + β sin θ β β 2 2 2 2 14 1L 1S 1L 1S 0.38 0.34 2 2 2 2 14 1L 1S 0.38 spil 0.09 2 = 0.48 = 0.48 = 0.83 B 0.03 0.34 spil 0.09 2 = 0.64 = 0.64 = 1.04 1 B 0.03 β = β cos θ + β sin θ = 0.919 n p f = β = β β β β = 1 ij 12 12 13 14 j= 1 0.623 57

Group piles: p-multipliers Mokwa (1999) f f f f L T1 T 2 T 3 sp = 0.64 + 0.06 1 B sp = 0.34 + 0.11 1 B sp = 0.16 + 0.14 1 B sp = 0.04 + 0.16 1 B for the leading row for the 1st trailing row for the 2nd trailing row for the 3rd and subsequent trailing row 58

Group piles: p-multipliers Mokwa (1999) f f L T1 sp = 0.64 + 0.06 = 0.64 + 0.06( 3) = 0.82 B sp = 0.34 + 0.11 = 0.34 + 0.11( 3) = 0.67 B for the leading row for the 1st trailing row Predicted p-multipliers Leading Pile Trailing Pile Reese et al (2006) 0.866 0.623 Mokwa (1999) 0.820 0.670 59

Group piles: comparison of p-multipliers Comparison of predicted p-multipliers with measurements from pile group tests in dense, medium dense and loose sand 1.0 0.8 p-multiplier 0.6 Reese et al. (2006) Mokwa (1999) Leading piles Dense Medium dense Loose 0.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (% of diameter) 60

Group piles: comparison of p-multipliers Comparison of predicted p-multipliers with measurements from pile group tests in dense, medium dense and loose sand 1.0 0.8 Reese et al. (2006) Mokwa (1999) Dense Medium dense Loose p-multiplier 0.6 Trailing piles 0.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Lateral Deflection of Pile Head (% of diameter) 61

Summary and Conclusions An instrumented model pile, a soil tank, a large-scale pluviator, a driving system, and a jacking system were fabricated Lateral load tests were performed on preinstalled, driven and jacked model piles installed in sand prepared at different densities The effects of soil conditions and pile installation method on the model pile capacities were evaluated 62

Summary and Conclusions For single piles, the predictions from the developed analysis were in good agreement with the model pile test results for small pile head deflections (up to 10% of the pile diameter) For pile groups, the measured p-multipliers are in reasonable agreement with those obtained from Mokwa (1999) and Reese et al. (2006) the measured p-multipliers for the leading piles were 85%~90% less than the predicted values for the trailing piles, the measured p-multipliers were in good agreement with the predictions 63

References Basu, D. (2006). Analysis of laterally loaded piles in layered soil. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University. Basu, D., Salgado, R. and Prezzi. M. (2008). Analysis of laterally loaded piles in multilayered soil deposits. Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2007/23, JTRP Lee, J. & Salgado, R. (2000). Analysis of calibration chamber plate load tests. Can. Geotech. J., 37, 14-25. Mokwa, R. L. (1999). Investigation of the resistance of pile caps to lateral loading. Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Mokwa, R. L. & Duncan, J. M. (2001). Experimental evaluation of lateral-load resistance of pile caps. J. Geotech. Geoenv. Engng., Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs. 127, No. 2, 185-192. Poulos, H. G. & Davis, E. H. (1980). Pile foundation analysis and design. John Wiley & Sons,Inc. Randolph, M. F. (1981). The response of flexible piles to lateral loading. Geotechnique 31, No. 2,247-259. Reese, L. C., Isenhower, W. M. & Wang, S.-T. (2006). Analysis and design of shallow and deep foundations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reese, L.C. and Van Impe, W.F. (2001). Single Piles and Pile Groups Under Lateral Loading, A. A.Balkema, Rotterdam. Salgado, R. (2008). The Engineering of Foundations, McGraw-Hill Science.