Kentucky Geological Survey Marvin Blan #1 Hancock County, Kentucky Geologic Review. J. Richard Bowersox David A. Williams Kentucky Geological Survey

Similar documents
Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Test

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

CO 2 Storage Potential in the Mt Simon Sandstone, Western Kentucky. Rick Bowersox January 22, 2008

Seismic Data and Drilling in Hancock Co., Kentucky February 21, 2008

The Illinois Basin Decatur Project Decatur, Illinois USA: Overview and Impacts. Sallie E. Greenberg

Geology of the Kentucky Geological Survey Marvin Blan No. 1 Well, East-Central Hancock County, Kentucky

Where to Drill in Western Kentucky February

Source Sink Pipeline

Geologic and Reservoir Characterization and Modeling

An Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: The Illinois Basin-Decatur Site

Seismic-Data Interpretations near the Blan Carbon Sequestration Test Well in Hancock Co., Kentucky

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project

Development and Implementation of a Monitoring Plan at a 1-million Tonne CCS Demonstration: Decatur, Illinois USA

Basin-Scale Hydrological Impact of Geologic Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: A Full-Scale Deployment Scenario

Assessment of CO 2 Enhanced Gas Recovery in Shale Gas Reservoirs (Preliminary)*

East Bend Test Site Core Team

Minewater Management Annual Meeting Marion, Illinois. August 13, 2013

The Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Storage in the Saline Arbuckle Aquifer on Water Quality in Freshwater Aquifers in Kansas

2 OVERVIEW OF SHALLOW BOREHOLE INVESTIGATIONS

By: Jared T. Freiburg Illinois State Geological Survey 5/17/ cm

ADM CCS Projects Experience and Lessons Learned

region includes nine states and four provinces, covering over 1.4 million square miles. The PCOR Partnership

Colorado s Underground Injection Control Program: Prevention and Mitigation of Induced Seismicity

StackFRAC HD system outperforms cased hole in vertical wells

PART I Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Energy: History and Potential of the Newest and Largest Renewable Energy Resource

Introduction to Formation Evaluation Abiodun Matthew Amao

Technology of Production from Shale

West Coast Research. WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission

ILLINOIS GROUNDWATER - BEDROCK

Exploration, Drilling & Production

GeothermEx, Inc. GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR THE SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION HOLE PROGRAM, KILAUEA EAST RIFT ZONE, HAWAII TASK 1 REPORT

Basin-scale Modeling of CO 2 Sequestration in the Illinois Basin Status Report

Hostile downhole conditions present complex challenges

Measurement, Monitoring and Verification (MMV)

Geologic Characterization of Stratigraphic Sequences in the Upper Ohio River Valley for Determination of Brine Storage Capacity

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project

Heterogeneity Type Porosity. Connected Conductive Spot. Fracture Connected. Conductive Spot. Isolated Conductive Spot. Matrix.

THE MARCELLUS SHALE GAS PLAY Geology, Development, and Water-Resource Impact Mitigation

MicroScope. Resistivity- and imagingwhile-drilling

Developments in Storage and Monitoring for CCUS

Evaluation of Petrophysical Properties of an Oil Field and their effects on production after gas injection

Well Construction and Cementing Practices in Shale and Salt Water Disposal Wells

Geologic Storage (Almacenamiento Geológico) Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 )

Cornish Institute of Engineers Conference th October 2013

Recommendations for Injection and Storage Monitoring

MRCSP- Michigan Basin Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Field Test

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership

The UK GeoEnergy Test Bed Ceri J Vincent British Geological Survey

Corporate Houston, TX... (713)

COGCC Underground Injection Program & Induced Seismicity

secarbon.org Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (SECARB) Central Appalachian Coal Seam Project

Assessing the Tier 2 Trigger for Fractured Sedimentary Bedrock Sites

S^aaav. DOE Award Number: DE-FG26-99FT E. Peabody Dr. Champaign, IL Champaign, IL Reservoir Characterization & 3D Models

WESTCARB Phase I Results Review

An Evaluation of the Carbon Sequestration Potential of the Cambro-Ordovician Strata of the Illinois and Michigan Basins

Outcrop Analog Lower Paleozoic Hydrothermal Dolomite Reservoirs, Mohawk Valley, New York

An Overview of Carbon Sequestration in Pennsylvania. John A. Harper Pennsylvania Geological Survey

Geologic CO 2 Storage Options for California

Geologic Structure and Seismic Analysis

Opitmising riser-less Drilling

secarb.org Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (SECARB) Central Appalachian Coal Seam Project

DRILLING REPORT (DGO-GO-14)

WELL TESTING COURSE. Authors: Enzo Beretta ENI E&P. Francesca Verga Politecnico di Torino

Activated creeping shale to remove the open annulus

R ENW Services - Geophysics & GIS

ractical Geomechanics for Oil & Gas Industry

An Evaluation of the Carbon Sequestration Potential of the Cambro-Ordovician Strata of the Illinois and Michigan Basins.

geovision Resistivity imaging for productive drilling

A Field Case Example of Wellbore Strengthening Design and Verification Process

AADE-02-DFWM-HO-30. Lost Circulation Solutions for Severe Sub-Salt Thief Zones M. Ferras, Sonatrach; M. Galal and D. Power, M-I L.L.C.

Subsurface Maps. K. W. Weissenburger. Isopach. Isochore. Conoco, Inc. Ponca City, Oklahoma, U.S.A.

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

SECARB Phase III ANTHROPOGENIC TEST: Risk Management through Detailed Geologic Characterization and Modeling

Coring and Core Analysis Reading Assignment

Hot Creek Valley Oil Field

DRILLING REPORT (DGO-GO-14)

U.S. Department of the Interior Alaska Rural Energy Project

Drilling Challenges Related to Geopressure Compartmentalization Selim S. Shaker, Geopressure Analysis Services (G.A.S.)

J.V. Herwanger* (Ikon Science), A. Bottrill (Ikon Science) & P. Popov (Ikon Science)

X,800. X,850 ft. X,900 ft. X,950 ft. X,000 ft. GeoSphere. Reservoir Mapping-While-Drilling Service

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS OIL, GAS, AND PETROCHEMICALS. The Energy and Resources Institute

Progress report for WY-CUSP: Characterization of the premier storage reservoirs and geological CO 2. storage site in Wyoming

Formation Evaluation: Logs and cores

Fundamentals Of Petroleum Engineering FORMATION EVALUATION

Introduction Geology

Activity Submitted by Tim Schroeder, Bennington College,

Seismicity induced by Shale Gas Hydraulic Stimulation: Preese Hall, Blackpool, United Kingdom.

Modeling pressure response into a fractured zone of Precambrian basement to understand deep induced-earthquake hypocenters from shallow injection

Comparison of Using Combination of Acetic Acid and Hydrochloric Acid with Only Hydrochloric Acid as Matrix Pre Flush

IBDP Pre-Injection Microseismicity

Reservoir Management Background OOIP, OGIP Determination and Production Forecast Tool Kit Recovery Factor ( R.F.) Tool Kit

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) Press Briefing. February 21, 2008

DEVEX Moving in the Right Direction; Realising Upside Potential in a Mature Field Using Real Time 3D Geo-Steering Technology

Storage: Deep Monitoring and Verification

Shale Development and Hydraulic Fracturing or Frac ing (Fracking) What is it?

Senior Thesis. Subsurface Stratigraphy of Middle Cambrian-Middle Ordovician Rocks in Central Morrow County, Ohio. by William Camphire

EAS 233 Geologic Structures and Maps Winter Miscellaneous practice map exercises. 1. Fault and separation:

Rocks. George E. King Engineering GEKEngineering.com 3/14/2009 1

Transcription:

Kentucky Geological Survey Marvin Blan #1 Hancock County, Kentucky Geologic Review J. Richard Bowersox David A. Williams Kentucky Geological Survey KYCCS Western Kentucky Project Review Lexington, Kentucky October 23, 2009

Regional Injection Wells

Project Goals Demonstrate and characterize the potential for the geologic storage of CO 2 in western Kentucky Target reservoir is the Knox Dolomite Found 3617 ft of Knox Dolomite, including Gunter Sandstone Average porosity 6.7% calculated from logs Successfully injected 18,454 BW brine and 323 T CO 2 Evaluate St Peter and Mount Simon Sandstones, if present Test the reservoir potential of the Precambrian Middle Run Sandstone Characterize the reservoir sealing properties of the New Albany Shale, Maquoketa Shale, Black River Group, and non-reservoir intervals in the Knox

Drilling Marvin Blan #1 Drilling commenced on April 24, 2009 Casing cemented at 3660 ft, open hole below to TD Drilled through the Knox Group using CaCO 3 -based mud to mitigate potential reservoir damage Seven cores cut to test reservoir and seal properties Reservoir seals New Albany Shale (30 ft) Maquoketa Shale (31 ft) Black River Limestone (61 ft) CO 2 storage reservoirs Knox Group (three cores, 243 ft total) Precambrian Middle Run Sandstone (30 ft) Reached TD at 8126 ft on June 14

Drilling Results St Peter Sandstone effectively absent: only six inches of sand was present at the Knox unconformity The Knox Group was found 85 ft structurally higher than expected and 380 ft thinner Eau Claire was considerably thinner than expected, only 187 ft thick including a 61 ft dolomite bed Top of the Precambrian Middle Run Sandstone was found 420 ft higher than expected

Strata penetrated in the Marvin Blan #1.

Maquoketa Shale Core Maquoketa Shale was cored 2800-2831 ft to test its reservoir seal properties Analyses of seal properties Threshold entry pressure XRD mineralogy Thin section petrography Mechanical properties

St. Peter Sandstone (6 inches) Epikarst infilled with sandstone (3 inches) Unconformity Knox Dolomite

Structural contours on top of the Knox Group.

Stratigraphic correlation of the Knox Group and deeper strata.

Knox Dolomite Cores Knox Dolomite was cored in three intervals (total 243 ft) to test reservoir properties St Peter -Beekmantown (123 ft) Beekmantown-Gunter (101 ft) Copper Ridge (19 ft) Found porosity system to be a complex of preserved fabric, primary dolomite porosity, vugs, and fractures Extensive analysis program Routine core analysis Mechanical properties XRD mineralogy CO 2 core flood Thin section petrography Threshold entry pressure

5098 CMI log section and core showing vuggy porosity in the Beekmantown Dolomite

Knox Reservoir Properties Average Porosity 6.7% NNW Fracture Trend

Potential Reservoir Volume in the Knox 240 180 41 Base: all data Cutoff cases: 1. caliper > 10½ in. 2. porosity > 20% 3. porosity < 5% 4. porosity < 6% 5. porosity < 7% 6. porosity <8% 7. porosity < 9% 8. porosity < 10%

Middle Run Sandstone Core Precambrian Middle Run Sandstone was cored 8000-8030 ft to evaluate its potential as a carbon storage reservoir DOE-NETL grant for coring and analysis Analysis Program Routine core analysis Fracture orientation XRD mineralogy Thin section petrography Provenance Zircon age dating Mechanical properties

Drilling Challenges Drilling rig and wellhead mechanical failures Lower than expected penetration rates Borehole deviation below 3000 ft Angle built to 5.75 Used Schlumberger Vertical Seeking Power V System to bring borehole back to vertical Lost circulation thief zone at 5581 ft Successfully controlled with LCM Drilled ~250 ft deeper than necessary to achieve objectives due to missed formation tops Added two days to drilling

Marvin Blan #1 Depth vs. Days Drilling took 62 days, 13 days longer than planned, despite a shallower than planned TD.

Injection Testing Beekmantown Gunter Copper Ridge Eau Claire Middle Run Three tests with straddle packers basal Copper Ridge: 218.8 BW, broke down at 0.9 psi/ft gradient and took water on vacuum upper Copper Ridge: two tests, total 5192.7 BW, lost seal due to communication through formation porosity system around packers Two tests with single packer Copper Ridge below 6089 ft: 2190 BW brine,1212.1 BW with borax tracer Full wellbore below 3620 ft: 7075.7 BW with borax tracer Injection rates to 14 BPM at 285-500 psi wellhead pressure Found 70% of water was injected above the Copper Ridge

Regional correlation of Knox injection zones

CO 2 Injection Injected a total of 323 Tons of CO 2 (1765 bbl or 5646 mcfg) below a packer set in casing at 3603 ft Limited to 4.1 BPM rate due to pump limitations Wellhead pressure 936 psi, bottomhole pressure 1754 psi Post-injection flushed with 4568 BW brine Long-term downhole pressure gauge in place to monitor pressure fall-off pending re-entry for additional tests

Additional Work Testing planned for 2010, funded by DOE research award of $1.6 million Additional brine, possibly additional CO 2 injection 3D VSP to image injection plume Knox reservoir evaluation Plug and abandon the Marvin Blan #1 in compliance with State and EPA regulations Remediate drillsite Groundwater and soil gas monitoring through 2012

Acknowledgements This research is being supported by a grant from the Commonwealth of Kentucky with additional contributions by the Energy and Environment Cabinet, the University of Kentucky, and a consortium of more than twenty industry partners. Principal contributors include: Western Kentucky Carbon Storage Foundation ConocoPhillips Company Peabody Energy E.ON U.S. T.V.A. Illinois Office of Coal Development US DOE-NETL GEO Consultants, LLC Schlumberger Carbon Services Smith Management Company Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, LLP