Clayey sand (SC)

Similar documents
Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Analysis of a single pile settlement

S E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S

Spread footing settlement and rotation analysis

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PILES IN SAND BASED ON SOIL-PILE INTERACTION

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

Verification Manual. of GEO5 Gravity Wall program. Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Verze: 1.0-en Fine Ltd.

ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED FIXED HEADED SINGLE FLOATING PILE IN MULTILAYERED SOIL USING BEF APPROACH

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

Foundations of High Rise Buildings

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

Evaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil

Axially Loaded Piles

Entrance exam Master Course

EXTENDED ABSTRACT. Combined Pile Raft Foundation

Dynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment

Correlations between soil parameters and penetration testing results

K Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions

Mechanical Behaviors of Cylindrical Retaining Structures in Ultra-deep Excavation

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

1 Introduction. Abstract

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

SOIL MODELS: SAFETY FACTORS AND SETTLEMENTS

(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

Single Pile Simulation and Analysis Subjected to Lateral Load

Talić Z. et al: Geotechnical characteristics... Archives for Technical Sciences 2014, 11(1), 33-39

O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix)

Appraisal of Soil Nailing Design

NEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS

Theory of Shear Strength

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt

Theory of Shear Strength

RELIABILITY ASPECTS OF DESIGN OF COMBINED PILED-RAFT FOUNDATIONS (CPRF)

Spread footing verification Input data

TIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR OF PILE UNDER LATERAL LOAD USING THE BOUNDING SURFACE MODEL

ANALYSES OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION BASED ON VERTICAL LOAD TESTS OF DISPLACEMENT PILES

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

Seismic design of bridges

Calculation and analysis of internal force of piles excavation supporting. based on differential equation. Wei Wang

INELASTIC RESPONSES OF LONG BRIDGES TO ASYNCHRONOUS SEISMIC INPUTS

Interpretation of Pile Integrity Test (PIT) Results

Assignment 1 - actions

CE : CIVIL ENGINEERING

Gapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil

DESIGNING FOR DOWNDRAG ON UNCOATED AND BITUMEN COATED PILES

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

The San Jacinto Monument Case History

Internal C Unit Dilatanc y

Cyclic lateral response of piles in dry sand: Effect of pile slenderness

Validation of empirical formulas to derive model parameters for sands

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

Practical Algorithm for large diameter pile tip bearing capacity based on displacement control RUAN Xiang 1, a

Erratum. Chapter 4 - Earth and water pressure 26. Chapter Area loads. q a. c+d ϕ'/2. Piling Handbook, 9th edition (2016)

PLAXIS 3D FOUNDATION Validation Manual. version 1.5

CHAPTER 8 ANALYSES OF THE LATERAL LOAD TESTS AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Experimental setup and Instrumentation

Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Recent Load History on the Behaviour of Steel Piles under Horizontal Loading

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

Finite Element Investigation of the Interaction between a Pile and a Soft Soil focussing on Negative Skin Friction

Numerical modelling of tension piles

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Offshore subsoil investigations

water proofing will relatively long time fully completed) be provided 10 storey building (15x25m) original GWT position 1 sat = 20 kn/m 3

NUMERICAL VERIFICATION OF GEOTECHNICAL STRUCTURE IN UNFAVOURABLE GEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS CASE STUDY

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)

THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATIONS BASED ON LRFD FOR JAPANESE HIGHWAYS

Use of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in Geotechnical and Substructure Applications

Bending and Shear in Beams

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

Negative Skin Friction on Large Pile Group New Wembley Stadium. Mei Cheong

Post-Construction Settlement Calculation and Prediction for Group Piles Foundation of High Speed Railway Bridge

Seismic Analysis of Soil-pile Interaction under Various Soil Conditions

OP-023. INTERPRETATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST PILE RESULT

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT. PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Coral Spring, Trelawny, Jamaica.

Analysis of Load-Settlement Relationship for Unpaved Road Reinforced with Geogrid

CONSOLIDATION BEHAVIOR OF PILES UNDER PURE LATERAL LOADINGS

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

Evolution Group 7 - Pile Design

Numerical Analysis of Pile Behavior under Lateral Loads in. Layered Elastic Plastic Soils

CALCULATION OF A SHEET PILE WALL RELIABILITY INDEX IN ULTIMATE AND SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATES

Small and large scale direct shear tests on sand-concrete Interface

Lateral Strength and Stiffness of Post and Pier Foundations

SETTLEMENT EVALUATION OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION SUBJECTED TO VERTICAL LOAD ON THE MULTI-LAYER SOIL

Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.

UPLIFT CAPACITY OF PILES SUBJECTED TO INCLINED LOAD IN TWO LAYERED SOIL. Dr. Sunil S. Pusadkar 1, Sachin Ghormode 2 ABSTRACT

COEFFICIENT OF DYNAMIC HORIZONTAL SUBGRADE REACTION OF PILE FOUNDATIONS ON PROBLEMATIC GROUND IN HOKKAIDO Hirofumi Fukushima 1

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

S. Freitag, B. T. Cao, J. Ninić & G. Meschke

MARCH 2016 DR. Z s CORNER

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Monopile design

Analysis of pile foundation Simplified methods to analyse the pile foundation under lateral and vertical loads

Design of RC Retaining Walls

A. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1

Transcription:

Pile Bearing Capacity Analysis / Verification Input data Project Task : PROJECT: "NEW STEAM BOILER U-5190 Part : A-1 Descript. : The objective of this Analysis is the Pile allowable bearing Capacity Analysis % Calculations for the construction of the New Steam Boiler U-5190, in Aspropyrgos Industrial Complex. Author : Dr. C. Sachpazis, Civil & Geotechnical Engineer BEng (Hons) Civil Eng. UK, Dipl. Geol, M.Sc.Eng UK, Ph.D. NTUA (Ε.Μ.Π.), Post-Doc. UK, MICE. Customer : H.P. S.A. Date : 09-Oct-13 Name : Project Stage : 1 OG FG 1.50 1.00 3.20 GWT +z 2.30 16.00 Basic soil parameters No. Name Pattern 1 Poorly graded gravel (GP), medium dense ϕ ef c ef γ γ su [ ] [kpa] [kn/m 3 ] [kn/m 3 ] 35.50 0.00 19.00 9.50 2 High plasticity clay (CH,CV,CE), consistency soft 27.00 0.00 18.00 9.00 3 Clayey sand (SC) 42.00 0.00 21.00 11.50 All soils are considered as cohesionless for at rest pressure analysis. 1

No. Name Pattern E oed E def γ sat γ s n [MPa] [MPa] [kn/m 3 ] [kn/m 3 ] [-] 1 2 Poorly graded gravel (GP), medium dense High plasticity clay (CH,CV,CE), consistency soft 161.00-19.50 - - 8.00-19.00 - - 3 Clayey sand (SC) 40.00-21.50 - - Parameters of soils to compute modulus of subsoil reaction No. Name Pattern β 1 2 Poorly graded gravel (GP), medium dense High plasticity clay (CH,CV,CE), consistency soft 15.00 10.00 3 Clayey sand (SC) 25.00 Soil parameters Poorly graded gravel (GP), medium dense Unit weight : γ = 19.00 kn/m 3 Angle of internal friction : ϕ ef = 35.50 Cohesion of soil : c ef = 0.00 kpa Poisson's ratio : ν = 0.20 Oedometric modulus : E oed = 161.00 MPa Saturated unit weight : γ sat = 19.50 kn/m 3 Angle of dispersion : β = 15.00 High plasticity clay (CH,CV,CE), consistency soft Unit weight : γ = 18.00 kn/m 3 Angle of internal friction : ϕ ef = 27.00 Cohesion of soil : c ef = 0.00 kpa Poisson's ratio : ν = 0.42 Oedometric modulus : E oed = 8.00 MPa Saturated unit weight : γ sat = 19.00 kn/m 3 Angle of dispersion : β = 10.00 Clayey sand (SC) Unit weight : γ = 21.00 kn/m 3 Angle of internal friction : ϕ ef = 42.00 Cohesion of soil : c ef = 0.00 kpa Poisson's ratio : ν = 0.35 Oedometric modulus : E oed = 40.00 MPa Saturated unit weight : γ sat = 21.50 kn/m 3 Angle of dispersion : β = 25.00 2

Geometry of structure Pile geometry Pile profile: circular Dimensions Diameter d = 1.00 m Length l = 16.00 m Location Off ground height h = 0.00 m Depth of finished grade h z = 0.00 m Technology Piles with excavation of soil from a bore hole Pile type: bored with or without clayey suspension Heel resistance reduction = 0.50 Skin resistance reduction = 0.60 Modulus of subsoil reaction assumed constant. Material of structure Analysis of concrete structures carried out according to the standard EN 1992 1-1 (EC2). Concrete : C 40/50 Longitudinal steel : B500 Geological profile and assigned soils Layer No. Assigned soil [m] Pattern 1 3.20 Poorly graded gravel (GP), medium dense 2 2.30 High plasticity clay (CH,CV,CE), consistency soft 3 - Clayey sand (SC) Assumed Loads Load N M x M y H x H y No. Name Type new change [kn] [knm] [knm] [kn] [kn] 1 YES Load No. 1 Design 2842.00 500.00 250.00 100.00 50.00 3

Ground water table The ground water table is at a depth of 1.50 m below the original terrain elevation. Name : GWT + subsoil Stage : 1 OG FG 1.50 1.00 GWT 16.00 Analysis settings Analysis carried out without reduction of input data. 4

Name : Vert. cap. (springs) Stage : 1; Verification : 1 Ultimate load transfer curve (0,0) 568.49 1136.97 1705.46 2273.94 2842.43 Q[kN] 5.4 10.8 16.2 21.6 27.0 s[mm] 5

Name : Vert. cap. (springs) Stage : 1; Verification : 1 6

Verification No. 1 Name : Vert. cap. (springs) Stage : 1; Verification : 1 Shear - deformation dependence (at a depth of 0.00m) 60.0 Shear [kpa] 48.0 36.0 24.0 12.0 Displacement[mm] (0,0) 5.4 10.8 16.2 21.6 27.0 7

Verification No. 1 Name : Horiziontal cap. Stage : 1; Verification : 1 Modulus Kh Kh - constant Displacement Max. = 0.26 mm Shear force Max. = 100.00 kn Bending moment Max. = 250.00 knm 0.0-100.00-250.00 3.48 141.51-0.3 3.48 19.34 7.66 1.79 19.34 0.1-150.00 0 150.00-0.5 0 0.5 [MN/m3] [mm] -150.00 0 150.00 [kn] -300.00 0 300.00 [knm] 8

Verification No. 1 Name : Horiziontal cap. Stage : 1; Verification : 1 Modulus Kh Kh - constant Displacement Max. = 1.38 mm Shear force Max. = 109.21 kn Bending moment Max. = 500.00 knm -1.4-50.00 500.00 109.21 3.48 141.51 3.48 19.34 0.7-12.83-4.19 19.34-0.2-150.00 0 150.00-2.0 0 2.0 [MN/m3] [mm] -150.00 0 150.00 [kn] -500.00 0 500.00 [knm] 9

Verification No. 1 Name : Horiziontal cap. Stage : 1; Verification : 1 Modulus Kh Kh - constant -1.4 Displacement Max. = 0.72 mm Min. = -1.38 mm 0.6 Shear force Max. = 128.82 kn Min. = -100.00 kn -100.00 111.80 Bending moment Max. = 559.02 knm Min. = -250.00 knm -250.00 559.02 98.06 0.3-0.2 128.82 3.48 141.51-0.3 3.48 19.34 0.7 7.17-7.90 7.66 1.43-1.62-14.33 1.79 0.0 0.0-4.47 19.34-0.2 0.1-150.00 0 150.00-2.0 0 2.0 [MN/m3] [mm] -150.00 0 150.00 [kn] -600.00 0 600.00 [knm] 10

Maximum internal force and deformation : Max. pile displacement = 1.4 mm Max. shear force = 128.82 kn Maximum moment = 559.02 knm Dimensioning of reinforcement: Reinforcement - 6 pc bars 30.0 mm; Nominal covering 40.0 mm Reinforcement ratio ρ = 0.270 % > 0.182 % = ρ min Load : N Ed = -2842.00 kn (compression) ; M Ed = 559.02 knm Bearing capacity : N Rd = -14135.36 kn; M Rd = 1791.43 knm Designed pile reinforcement is SATISFACTORY. Athens, 09 October - 2013 On behalf of and for Geodomisi Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis, Civil & Geotechnical Engineer BEng (Hons) Civil Eng. UK, Dipl. Geol, M.Sc.Eng UK, Ph.D. NTUA (Ε.Μ.Π.), Post-Doc. UK, MICE.. Associate Professor of Geotechnical Engineering Registration No. 440 of Professional Licence issued by the Greek Ministry of Public Works 11