Lower 8.3 Miles of the Lower Passaic River Operable Unit 2 Presentation to the Passaic River Community Advisory Group.

Similar documents
Lower 8.3 Miles of the Lower Passaic River Operable Unit 2 Presentation to The Passaic River Community Advisory Group. September 14, 2017

Appendix I. Dredged Volume Estimates. Draft Contractor Document: Subject to Continuing Agency Review

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

Stabilization Study. Prepared For: The Town of Bethlehem. Henry Hudson Park Shoreline Stabilization Study. June 2011

TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR NY/NJ HARBOR ESTUARY PROGRAM USEPA REGION 2 TOXICS TMDL MODEL DEVELOPMENT. New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program

Tom Blackman Project Lead. Mékell Mikell Communications Representative

Community Erosion Assessment Napakiak, Alaska 15 January 2008

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS. Dr. Margarita Stancheva

Connecticut Coastal Management Program

PTM: A Lagrangian Particle Tracking Model. Joseph Gailani

3. MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION

NOAA s OCM: Services, tools and collaboration opportunities & Puerto Rico s NE Marine Corridor as a case study

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

Overview of Methods. Terrestrial areas that are most important for conservation Conservation

NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY HARBOR NAVIGATION CHANNEL DEEPENING

Application #: TEXT

MISSISSIPPI COASTAL IMPROVEMENTS

Restoration Goals TFG Meeting. Agenda

Old Stone Sewer Main Street

Appendix C Fluvial Flood Hazards

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

Sediment Stability in the Lower Passaic River Integration of Multiple Lines of Evidence

Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Grand Canyon Sediment Augmentation Study. Tim Randle, P.E. Manager, Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Denver, Colorado

East Branch Grand Calumet River Great Lakes Legacy Act Sediment Remediation and Restoration Project

Bob Van Dolah. Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

September 2017 Revision 3 LPROU

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

HAZUS-MH: Earthquake Event Report

Illinois River Sediment Quality and Beneficial Use Options

Section B - Chapter 13 Neuse River Subbasin Bay River and Pamlico Sound

Sediment Geotechnical Characterization Work Plan (Appendix C-2 to PDI WP)

V. THE INTERACTIVE MAP

Feasibility Study for Potential Removal of McLane & Goldman Dams Souhegan River, Milford, NH. Public Kick-off Meeting

Hurricane Katrina and Oil Spills: Impact on Coastal and Ocean Environments

Project (Project No. US-CA-62-2) Maintenance Inspection and Reports (Subtask 14.1) Inspection Report No.2

Identifying, Understanding and Addressing Flood-Related Hazards

April 9, Phosphate Mining and Reclamation Overview

An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations

Land use study of Mellieha Valley

LEVELS IN SOIL AND WATER. Richard Wenning 1, Andrea Von Burg 1, Linda Martello 1, John Pekala 1, Martha Maier 2, William Luksemburg 2.

Fish Passage Studies III: Sediment Redistribution and Impact Analysis: Springborn Dam - Enfield, Connecticut

EXISTING CONDITIONS : EAST SEGMENT

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS

Assessment of the Hood River Delta Hood River, Oregon

Department of National Defence B-Jetty Reconstruction

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Sediment Management in the Coastal Bays

March 13, 2015 Presented at the Western Dredging Association, Midwest Chapter Meeting March 11 13, 2015, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Carbon Sequestration Potential from Coastal Wetlands Restoration Sites

History of Natural and Man-Made Disaster within the Region. There have been two aircraft accident resulting in casualties within the past 50 years.

THE MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND ENERGY INDUSTRIES MINERALS DIVISION MINE DESIGN TEMPLATE OPERATOR NAME: OPERATOR ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FACSIMILE:

YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY

WATER LEVEL REGIMES CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS TRANSITIONAL HABITATS AND REFUGIA

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR VERIFICATION OF CORPS JURISDICTION

Geology, Soils, and Seismicity

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

5 Coastal Management

Programmatic Approaches to Assessing and Mitigating Risk to Pipelines from Natural Forces

THE PORTFIELDS INITIATIVE: REVITALIZING BROWNFIELDS IN PORT COMMUNITIES

WELCOME Lake Wabukayne OPEN HOUSE

First Nations Liaison and Field Monitor. Austin Paul

Terms of Reference for the Comparative Environmental Review (CER) of. Options for the Mactaquac Project, Mactaquac, New Brunswick

ΛTKINS. Applications of Regional Sediment Management Concepts in Texas Estuarine Restoration Projects. Riparian Workshop Fort Worth, October 17, 2012

Level 1 Geography, 2016

New Jersey Department of Transportation Extreme Weather Asset Management Pilot Study

Response Case Study: April 2014 Historic Flood Event. Severe Weather April 29 30, 2014

GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA 2016 SAMPLING EVENT HARSHAW CHEMICAL COMPANY FUSRAP SITE

ADDENDA #1 CONTRACT # C May 3, 2013 Page 1 of 1

Erosion Information Paper - South Naknek, Alaska Current as of November 14, 2007

Section 4: Model Development and Application

Preparation of Database for Urban Development

Phase 1 Geoscientific Preliminary Assessment Southern Ontario, Sedimentary Communities

Long-Distance Pumping and Opportunities for Engineering with Nature

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

Active Traffic & Safety Management System for Interstate 77 in Virginia. Chris McDonald, PE VDOT Southwest Regional Operations Director

Chapter 6. Fundamentals of GIS-Based Data Analysis for Decision Support. Table 6.1. Spatial Data Transformations by Geospatial Data Types

Framework for the Basin-Wide Socio-Economic Analysis of Four Proposed Sediment Diversions. August 4, 2015

Coastal Processes 101 & The Regs. Greg Berman (Woods Hole Sea Grant & Cape Cod Cooperative Extension)

President s Day Weekend Storm Community Meeting and Workshop April 17, 2017

Sea Level Rise and the Scarborough Marsh Scarborough Land Trust Annual Meeting April 24, 2018

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

West Galveston Bay Regional Sediment Management Plan (An Eco-geomorphologic Approach)

THREAT CATEGORIES Level 1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 2 Level 3 Level Residential development. Commercial and.

When Creek Meets Valley Wall: Prioritizing Erosion Mitigation alongside the Oshawa Landfill

MEMORANDUM. REVISED Options for Landslide Regulations: Setbacks and Slope Height

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

4 Project Alternatives

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

2 nd Semester. Core Courses. C 2.1 City and Metropolitan Planning. Module 1: Urban Structure and Growth Implications

Atlas of the Upper Gila River Watershed

Land Use & Development Control Plan for Gangasagar Bakkhali Development Authority (GBDA)

Lower Passaic River Restoration Project/ Newark Bay Study Project Delivery Team (PDT) Meeting March 5, 2008 from 1:00 3:00 PM

Port of Kalama, 2013 TEMCO Berth Maintenance Dredging and In-water Flow-Lane Placement Project

Oyster Reef for Shoreline Stabilization and Restoration. Jason Kirkpatrick Conservation Program Manager MacDill AFB Tampa, Florida

RAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

What is a watershed or landscape perspective?

Transcription:

Lower 8.3 Miles of the Lower Passaic River Operable Unit 2 Presentation to the Passaic River Community Advisory Group March 15, 2018

Agenda Sediment sampling collection metrics Continuing Pre-Design Investigation activities in 2018 Sediment Processing Facility Site Selection Progress

Sample Collection Metrics through January 2018

Sediment core locations completed: 735 Sediment cores collected: 735 for sediment chemistry 183 for waste characterization 59 for geotechnical data 21 Dredge Elutriate/Column Settling Test (DRET/CST)

Continuing Pre-Design Investigation Activities in 2018

Continuing Pre-Design Investigation Activities Supplemental Sediment Sampling 2018 2019 Ongoing Spring Summer Fall Winter Bulkhead and Shoreline Evaluation Cultural Resources Evaluation Pore Water Sampling and Analysis Water Column Sampling Habitat Survey Utility Surveys Fish Studies (desktop) Borrow Site Assessments

Vessel awaiting use for sampling Vibracore Sampling

Sampling Vessel

Pontoon boats used for sample collection

Sediment Processing Facility and other Sites Selection Process

Upland Sites Needed Sediment Processing Facility Includes water treatment plant, separated sand and filter cake staging, managing large debris, waste loadout and shipment; accommodations for operations management and staff; may also include space for staging clean aggregate materials for cap construction Staging Area Sites Strategically located along the river for storing clean aggregate materials (e.g., sand, armor stone, thin cap materials) that are used for cap construction; several may be used Support Sites Used to store spare parts for dredging, sand spreading or process equipment, slurry pipeline sections for maintaining the in-river transfer conduit to the Sediment Processing Facility; sites down to 1 acre will be considered River Access Locations Needed for entry/exit from the river

Selection Criteria Sediment Processing Facility Proximity to dredge and cap areas between RM 0 and RM 2.6 is advantageous Usable size - at least 20 acres is desirable Transportation options truck, rail Engineering criteria Waterfront access Docking/mooring infrastructure Rail accessibility and capability Road access and capability Utility services Subsurface conditions and subsurface features

Selection Criteria Sediment Processing Facility Environmental impact criteria Cultural resources Existing and historical land uses Habitats critical to ecological processes Regulatory and land use criteria Proximity to residential and sensitive facilities Zoning Land acquisition/leasing

Site Selection Study Area Locale 1 OU 2, extending from the Passaic River s Confluence with Newark Bay at River Mile (RM) 0 to RM 8.3 Subdivided into 3 segments based on proximity to areas of significant dredge material volume Segment 1: RM 0 to 2.6 Segment 2: RM 2.6 to 5.7 Segment 3: RM 5.7 to 8.3

Site Selection Study Area Locale 2 Newark Bay from the mouth of the Lower Passaic River southward and into Arthur Kill to its confluence with the Rahway River

Site Selection Study Area Locale 3 Newark Bay from the mouth of the Lower Passaic River northward into the Hackensack River up to the Interstate 95/New Jersey Turnpike bridge crossing (Lewandowski Bridge)

Vicinity and Site Selection Evaluation Study Area Preliminary Candidate Sites (Locales 1 & 3)

Vicinity and Site Selection Evaluation Study Area Preliminary Candidate Sites (Locale 2)

Vicinity and Site Selection Study Area Segment 3 Segment 2 Segment 1

Estimated In-Situ Dredge Volume by River Mile

Commercial and Municipal-Owned Sites Clean Earth North Jersey Facility Located within Segment 1 (RM 2.4), this existing hazardous and non-hazardous industrial waste facility could be used to either directly accept limited volumes of dredged material or to support a newly developed sediment processing facility. Clean Earth Koppers Facility Located along the Hackensack River, this existing facility specializes in the management of non-hazardous dredged sediment and could be used to either directly accept dredged material or be developed by utilizing the existing facility infrastructure (to the extent practical) and constructing a sediment processing facility on any potentially available undeveloped portions of the site. Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission (PVSC) Facility Commercial/Governmental property located within Segment 1 (RM 0.3) with sufficient space available to host a sediment processing facility. Potentially existing sewerage and water treatment operations could be modified or incorporated into sediment treatment facility operations. Municipal-Owned Sites Properties within Locales 1 and 3 will be considered for use as support sites; GSH is currently utilizing a property owned by the Town of Harrison at RM 5.4 as a river access point for pre-design investigation field operations.

Vicinity and Site Selection Evaluation Study Area Municipal Owned Properties

Zoning Map Preliminary Candidate Sites Locale 1 Segment 1

Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission (PVSC) Property at RM 0.3

Syncon Resins Property at RM 2.2