StreBanD DSS: A Riparian Buffer Decision Support System for Planners

Similar documents
SWAT2009_LUC: A TOOL TO ACTIVATE LAND USE CHANGE MODULE IN SWAT 2009

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

The Evolution of NWI Mapping and How It Has Changed Since Inception

Development of Webbased. Tool for Tennessee

Improvement of the National Hydrography Dataset for Parts of the Lower Colorado Region and Additional Areas of Importance to the DLCC

Pierce Cedar Creek Institute GIS Development Final Report. Grand Valley State University

Name NRS 409 Exam I. 1. (24 Points) Consider the following questions concerning standard data for GIS systems.

The Road to Data in Baltimore

A Comprehensive Inventory of the Number of Modified Stream Channels in the State of Minnesota. Data, Information and Knowledge Management.

Wetland Mapping. Wetland Mapping in the United States. State Wetland Losses 53% in Lower US. Matthew J. Gray University of Tennessee

LUU_CHECKER: A Tool for Dynamically Incorporating New Land Uses in SWAT

STEREO ANALYST FOR ERDAS IMAGINE Stereo Feature Collection for the GIS Professional

Statewide Topographic Mapping Program

Louisiana Transportation Engineering Conference. Monday, February 12, 2007

Brazil Paper for the. Second Preparatory Meeting of the Proposed United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geographic Information Management

An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT)

Watershed Application of WEPP and Geospatial Interfaces. Dennis C. Flanagan

Geospatial Data, Services, and Products. National Surveying, mapping and geospatial conference

Name NRS 509 Exam I. Right Map

ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Streamlining Environmental Assessment through GIS

Land Use MTRI Documenting Land Use and Land Cover Conditions Synthesis Report

Geospatial Data Sources. SLO GIS User Group June 8, 2010

GIS Data, Technology, and Models. to Integrate Information and Improve Transportation Decision-Making. within the Eco-Logical* Framework for Oregon

An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT)

An Internet-Based Integrated Resource Management System (IRMS)

Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects

Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD), Nairobi, Kenya

Harrison 1. Identifying Wetlands by GIS Software Submitted July 30, ,470 words By Catherine Harrison University of Virginia

Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD), Nairobi, Kenya

A Help Guide for Using gssurgo to Find Potential Wetland Soil Landscapes

An Update on Land Use & Land Cover Mapping in Ireland

Appendix P San Joaquin Valley Greenprint

National Atlas of Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems (GDE)

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Project Leader: Project Partners:

Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD), Nairobi, Kenya. Introduction GIS ( 2 weeks: 10 days)

Manitoba s Elevation (LiDAR) & Imagery Datasets. Acquisition Plans & Opportunities for Collaboration

NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY DATASET (NHD) UPDATE PROJECT FOR US FOREST SERVICE REGION 3

EuroGEOSS Protected Areas Pilot

UPDATING THE MINNESOTA NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY

Link to USGS Phase 6 Land Use Viewer website:

GIS Data and Technology to Support Transportation & MPO Decision-Making & Planning. using an Eco-Logical* Approach within the Kansas City Region

Cloud Analysis Image: Product Guide

Yaneev Golombek, GISP. Merrick/McLaughlin. ESRI International User. July 9, Engineering Architecture Design-Build Surveying GeoSpatial Solutions

Geospatial Assessment in Support of Urban & Community Forestry Programs

Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat Mapping Study in the Upper and Middle Susitna Basin Study Plan Section 11.5

Technical Drafting, Geographic Information Systems and Computer- Based Cartography

Chesapeake Bay Remote Sensing Pilot Executive Briefing

Kyoto and Carbon Initiative - the Ramsar / Wetlands International perspective

Spanish national plan for land observation: new collaborative production system in Europe

Geospatial SDI Portal for effective Governance of Pune METROPOLIS region

CHAPTER 1 THE UNITED STATES 2001 NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE

Distinct landscape features with important biologic, hydrologic, geomorphic, and biogeochemical functions.

Remote Sensing and Geospatial Application for Wetlands Mapping, Assessment, and Mitigation

Advanced Image Analysis in Disaster Response

Geospatial Models Aid in Shoreland Zoning for Rural Maine Communities

REMOTE SENSING AND GEOSPATIAL APPLICATION FOR WETLAND MAPPING, ASSESSMENT, AND MITIGATION INTRODUCTION

LAND COVER CATEGORY DEFINITION BY IMAGE INVARIANTS FOR AUTOMATED CLASSIFICATION

Improvement of the National Hydrography Dataset for US Forest Service Region 3 in Cooperation with the National Forest Service

DEVELOPMENT OF GPS PHOTOS DATABASE FOR LAND USE AND LAND COVER APPLICATIONS

Streamlining Land Change Detection to Improve Control Efficiency

J.H. Campbell Generating Facility Pond A - Location Restriction Certification Report

Figure 0-18: Dendrogeomorphic analysis of streambank erosion and floodplain deposition (from Noe and others, 2015a)

CUYAHOGA COUNTY URBAN TREE CANOPY & LAND COVER MAPPING

The National Hydrography Dataset in the Pacific Region. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD), Nairobi, Kenya. Introduction GIS (2 weeks: 10 days)

Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Purcellville, Virginia

Targeted LiDAR use in Support of In-Office Address Canvassing (IOAC) March 13, 2017 MAPPS, Silver Spring MD

Estimating Probability of Success Rate

National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Update Project for US Forest Service Region 3

USING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY

Development of statewide 30 meter winter sage grouse habitat models for Utah

Introduction. Elevation Data Strategy. Status and Next Steps

Copernicus Overview. Major Emergency Management Conference Athlone 2017

Web (Java, ArcGIS Server [WebADF, flex, silverlight]) Mobile (ArcGIS Mobile, ArcPad, Windows Mobile) Deskt

Resolving habitat classification and structure using aerial photography. Michael Wilson Center for Conservation Biology College of William and Mary

U.S. Geological Survey Agency Briefing for MAPPS Mark L. DeMulder Director, National Geospatial Program. March 12, 2013

USGS Community Engagement and its Role in Improving The National Map

NOAA s OCM: Services, tools and collaboration opportunities & Puerto Rico s NE Marine Corridor as a case study

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Hydrological feature extraction from LiDAR. Grant Pearse 28 March 2017

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Regional GIS Initiatives Geospatial Technology Center

Desktop GIS for Geotechnical Engineering

Land Use / Land Cover Mapping in

MODULE 8 LECTURE NOTES 2 REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELLING

ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT Land Management Information Center. An Inventory of Its Records

EO Information Services. Assessing Vulnerability in the metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro (Floods & Landslides) Project

1.1 What is Site Fingerprinting?

Little Blackfoot TPA 2009 Sediment and Habitat Assessment QAQC Review March 9, 2010

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

Ecological Site Description Overview

The BASINS Watershed Analysis System -- Evolving to Embrace New Data and Techniques. PH (404) ; author

Nebraska. Large Area Mapping Initiative. The Nebraska. Introduction. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources

Hydrologic Modelling of the Upper Malaprabha Catchment using ArcView SWAT

Esri Image & Mapping Forum 9 July 2017 Geiger-Mode for Conservation Planning & Design by USDA NRCS NGCE

The 3D Elevation Program: Overview. Jason Stoker USGS National Geospatial Program ESRI 2015 UC

Roles of NGII in successful disaster management

Statewide wetland geospatial inventory update

Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) - Vegetation Survey of Huron Creek Houghton, MI

Transcription:

StreBanD DSS: A Riparian Buffer Decision Support System for Planners Dharmendra Saraswat Assoc. Prof,/Ext. Engineer- Geospatial 501-681-5987 (mobile) dsaraswat@uaex.edu

Acknowledgment Project Team: Dr. (s) Mike Daniels, Naresh Pai, and Mr. Ben Hancock Scientific Research Advisory (SRC): Mr. Arnold Hameister (Arkansas Forestry Commission), Mr. Caroll Guffey (University of Arkansas at Monticello), Dr. Hal Liechty (University of Arkansas at Monticello), Mr. Jim Wise (Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality), Ms. Lauren Chambers (USDA Rural Development), Mr. Rich Joslin (Natural Resources Conservation Service), Mr. John Lee, (Natural Resources Conservation Service ) - special invitee, and Mr. Tony Ramick (Arkansas Natural Resources Commission) Funding: ANRC and EPA

BACKGROUND Develop automated geospatial tool: Delineate streambanks Perform inventory of riparian forest buffer (RPBs) Operate with publically available data Assist scientists and planners

WHY GIS APPROACH? Speed suitable for large scale RPB Repeatability consistent results for multiple areas Accuracy statistically measurable results Dissemination GIS maps and data files (Photo: National Academic Press) Cost free public data, less time in situ, and flexible framework for updates

CURRENT PRODUCTS Current products National Wetlands Inventory LANDFIRE Vegetation National Land Cover Database (NLCD) Static data Limited interaction Coarse resolutions

CURRENT PRODUCTS...CONTD. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Program High altitude imagery and a GIS interface to detect, delineate, and produce maps of wetlands Inventory incomplete for Arkansas Static data which may differ from federal, state, or local policy Scientific Research Advisory 2013 NPS Committee Conference Meeting- September April 26, 18, 2012 2013

CURRENT PRODUCTS...CONTD. LANDFIRE Vegetation Product Predictive models used to classify inventory Available statewide Uses field referenced data, satellite imagery, and biophysical layers Pre-defined inputs and delivered at coarse resolution (30m) Scientific Research Advisory 2013 NPS Committee Conference Meeting- September April 26, 18, 2012 2013

CURRENT PRODUCTS...CONTD. National Land Cover Database 2006 Land cover classification- 30m 16 classes- including woody wetlands and emergent herbaceous wetlands Available statewide, delays between releases and not practical for large-scale Scientific Research Advisory 2013 NPS Committee Conference Meeting- September April 26, 18, 2012 2013

MAJOR FEATURES Publically available data Dataset Stream centerline Orthographic imagery Landuse Soil (in future version) Source National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Connection to GeoStor for assisting with data collection (Future) Process new data instantly AR State Land Information Board (ASLIB) Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies (CAST) Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Slope (in future version) AR State Land Information Board (ASLIB)

MAJOR COMPONENTS (2) Accessibility Developed with open-source software User friendly graphic user interface (GUI) Flexible with data from different sources Find streambank related information Automatically find streambank locations (Pai, N. and D. Saraswat. 2013. A geospatial tool for delineating streambanks. Environmental Modelling & Software 40(2):151-159. ) Evaluate riparian buffer zone criteria

ACT 391 Specifications for Zone 1 and 2 are provided in NRCS practice code 391 Zone 1 must have a minimum buffer width of 15 feet and comprise of forest cover. Zone 2 should be located upslope from Zone 1 and have a minimum buffer width of 20 feet. Similar to Zone 1, it should primarily consist of forest cover. Zone 1 and 2 should have a combined minimum buffer width of 35 feet. Depending on the adjacent land use (e.g. cropland, pasture, etc.) an additional filter strip should be implemented upslope from Zone 2.

ACT 393 Specification for Zone 3 is provided in NRCS practice code 393 Filter strip (termed as Zone 3) should have a minimum buffer width of 30 feet, and include mostly herbaceous vegetation (NRCS, 2004). Zones 1, 2, and 3 must have a minimum width of 65 feet.

IMPACT OF DATA QUALITY Accuracy limited by pixel size 20m target area 10m excess measured area 30m pixel Challenge to detect narrow channels Loss of information with coarse data 30m Landsat 1m Aerial

FUTURE GOALS Introduce StreBanD to cloud computing High, consistent performance for all users Streamline updates Share results Build a community Expand analysis Slope Soils Topographic information

DEMO DEMO