Basic concepts of cold atomic gases

Similar documents
The Gross-Pitaevskii Equation A Non-Linear Schrödinger Equation

Ultra-cold gases. Alessio Recati. CNR INFM BEC Center/ Dip. Fisica, Univ. di Trento (I) & Dep. Physik, TUM (D) TRENTO

Introduction to cold atoms and Bose-Einstein condensation (II)

Bose-Einstein Condensation

Bose-Einstein Condensate: A New state of matter

Quantum Properties of Two-dimensional Helium Systems

SYNTHETIC GAUGE FIELDS IN ULTRACOLD ATOMIC GASES

The Gross-Pitaevskii Equation and the Hydrodynamic Expansion of BECs

Superfluidity and superconductivity. IHP, Paris, May 7 and 9, 2007

The phases of matter familiar for us from everyday life are: solid, liquid, gas and plasma (e.f. flames of fire). There are, however, many other

Cold atoms. 1: Bose-Einstein Condensation. Emil Lundh. April 13, Department of Physics Umeå University

Ultracold Fermi and Bose Gases and Spinless Bose Charged Sound Particles

From BEC to BCS. Molecular BECs and Fermionic Condensates of Cooper Pairs. Preseminar Extreme Matter Institute EMMI. and

Confining ultracold atoms on a ring in reduced dimensions

When superfluids are a drag

The Gross-Pitaevskii Equation and the Hydrodynamic Expansion of BECs

The XY model, the Bose Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity in 2d (I)

Low dimensional quantum gases, rotation and vortices

From laser cooling to BEC First experiments of superfluid hydrodynamics

BEC Vortex Matter. Aaron Sup October 6, Advisor: Dr. Charles Hanna, Department of Physics, Boise State University

Non-equilibrium Dynamics in Ultracold Fermionic and Bosonic Gases

Vortices and other topological defects in ultracold atomic gases

5. Gross-Pitaevskii theory

Supersolids. Bose-Einstein Condensation in Quantum Solids Does it really exist?? W. J. Mullin

Bogoliubov theory of the weakly interacting Bose gas

Introduction to Cold Atoms and Bose-Einstein Condensation. Randy Hulet

Monte Carlo Simulation of Bose Einstein Condensation in Traps

SUPERFLUIDTY IN ULTRACOLD ATOMIC GASES

Ana Maria Rey. Okinawa School in Physics 2016: Coherent Quantum Dynamics. Okinawa, Japan, Oct 4-5, 2016

Fundamentals and New Frontiers of Bose Einstein Condensation

Bose-Einstein condensation of lithium molecules and studies of a strongly interacting Fermi gas

Bose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices

Cold fermions, Feshbach resonance, and molecular condensates (II)

arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 12 Oct 1998

84 Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems ics [Landau and Lifshitz (198)] then yields the thermodynamic potential so that one can rewrite the statist

Low-dimensional Bose gases Part 1: BEC and interactions

Quantum Gases. Subhadeep Gupta. UW REU Seminar, 11 July 2011

Drag force and superfluidity in the supersolid striped phase of a spin-orbit-coupled Bose gas

BCS-BEC Crossover. Hauptseminar: Physik der kalten Gase Robin Wanke

A Mixture of Bose and Fermi Superfluids. C. Salomon

Introduction to Bose-Einstein condensation 4. STRONGLY INTERACTING ATOMIC FERMI GASES

Non-Equilibrium Physics with Quantum Gases

Fundamentals and New Frontiers of Bose Einstein Condensation

BEC AND MATTER WAVES an overview Allan Griffin, University of Toronto

Interference between quantum gases

Lecture 4. Bose Einstein condensate (BEC) Optical lattices. Conclusions

Superfluidity and Condensation

Harvard University Physics 284 Spring 2018 Strongly correlated systems in atomic and condensed matter physics

Superfluidity in bosonic systems

Reference for most of this talk:

A Superfluid Universe

Shock waves in the unitary Fermi gas

Superfluidity and Superconductivity

Quantum optics of many-body systems

What are we going to talk about: BEC and Nonlinear Atom Optics

Lecture 3. Bose-Einstein condensation Ultracold molecules

A Mixture of Bose and Fermi Superfluids. C. Salomon

INTERACTING BOSE GAS AND QUANTUM DEPLETION

BEC of 6 Li 2 molecules: Exploring the BEC-BCS crossover

Ref: Bikash Padhi, and SG, Phys. Rev. Lett, 111, (2013) HRI, Allahabad,Cold Atom Workshop, February, 2014

Squeezing and superposing many-body states of Bose gases in confining potentials

ROTONS AND STRIPES IN SPIN-ORBIT COUPLED BECs

ICAP Summer School, Paris, Three lectures on quantum gases. Wolfgang Ketterle, MIT

Superfluidity of a 2D Bose gas (arxiv: v1)

Many-Body Physics with Quantum Gases

The physics of cold atoms from fundamental problems to time measurement and quantum technologies. Michèle Leduc

Nanoelectronics 14. [( ) k B T ] 1. Atsufumi Hirohata Department of Electronics. Quick Review over the Last Lecture.

Interaction between atoms

Chapter 7: Quantum Statistics

10 Supercondcutor Experimental phenomena zero resistivity Meissner effect. Phys463.nb 101

Lecture 4: Superfluidity

70 YEAR QUEST ENDS IN SUCCESS BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION 2001 NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS

From Optical Pumping to Quantum Gases

Dipolar Fermi gases. Gora Shlyapnikov LPTMS, Orsay, France University of Amsterdam. Outline

1 Fluctuations of the number of particles in a Bose-Einstein condensate

Quantum superpositions and correlations in coupled atomic-molecular BECs

Exploring quantum magnetism in a Chromium Bose-Einstein Condensate

arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 5 Apr 1999

Workshop on Supersolid August Brief introduction to the field. M. Chan Pennsylvania State University, USA

Quantum Theory of Matter

Magnetism in ultracold gases

Landau damping of transverse quadrupole oscillations of an elongated Bose-Einstein condensate

Condensate fraction for a polarized three-dimensional Fermi gas

Superfluidity & Bogoliubov Theory: Rigorous Results

PHYS598 AQG Introduction to the course

Physics Nov Bose-Einstein Gases

Chapter 7: Quantum Statistics

Realization of Bose-Einstein Condensation in dilute gases

Production of BECs. JILA June 1995 (Rubidium)

Effects of spin-orbit coupling on the BKT transition and the vortexantivortex structure in 2D Fermi Gases

Laser cooling and trapping

Workshop on Topics in Quantum Turbulence March Experiments on Bose Condensates

Superfluidity and Superconductivity Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena

Many-Body Problems and Quantum Field Theory

Bardeen Bardeen, Cooper Cooper and Schrieffer and Schrieffer 1957

Quasi Two-Dimensional 6 Li Fermi gas

Precision Interferometry with a Bose-Einstein Condensate. Cass Sackett. Research Talk 17 October 2008

Bogoliubov theory of disordered Bose-Einstein condensates

Fluids with dipolar coupling

Lecture 2: Weak Interactions and BEC

Transcription:

ECT* Workshop January 2015 Basic concepts of cold atomic gases Franco Dalfovo INO-CNR BEC Center Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trento Plan for the lectures: v Cold gases and BEC v Order parameter and Gross-Pitaevskii theory v Order parameter and superfluidity v Fermions 1

Bibliography: F. D., S.Giorgini, L.Pitaevskii, and S.Stringari, Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999) A.Leggett, Bose-Einstein condensation in the alkali gases: Some fundamental concepts, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 307 (2001) A.Griffin, D.W.Snoke and S.Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation, Cambridge University Press (1996) C. Pethick and H. Smith, Bose Einstein Condensation in Dilute Bose Gases, Cambridge University Press (2002) L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose Einstein Condensation, Oxford University Press (2003) W. Ketterle, D.S. Durfee, D.M. Stamper-Kurn, Making, probing and understanding Bose-Einstein condensates, Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Course CXL, Varenna, IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999), arxiv:cond-mat/9904034 S.Giorgini, L.Pitaevskii, and S.Stringari, Theory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1215 (2008) Cold gases and BEC 2

13/01/15 Hot and cold Melting copper Low temperature physics Just a boring little corner? Superconductivity Leiden, 1905 3

anomaly in the specific heat (Leiden, 1927) Superfluidity anomaly in the viscosity (Allen and Misener, Kapitza,1938) [taken from Buckingham, M.J., and Fairbank, W.M. (1961)] In 1938 Fritz London had the intuition: is superfluidity a manifestation of Bose-Einstein condensation? 4

Bose Einstein 5

Hot and cold Melting copper Superfluidity and superconductivity: Quantum Mechanics in the macroscopic world! Low temperature physics Hot and cold Melting copper In the case of superfluid helium, BEC is masked by the strong interaction among the atoms (the system is dense). In order to see the effects of BEC in a more direct and clean way, one has to use dilute ultracold (metastable) gases. Low temperature physics One must cool down further 6

Cold, very cold Inside stars Melting copper laser cooling + evaporative cooling An amazingly interesting new frontier!! Coldest gas, so far (450 pk) laser cooling ω L < ω 0 v ω L < ω 0 Lab frame ω L ω 0 ω L +kv ω L -kv Atom frame Red detuned laser. An atom moving against the beam sees the right frequency due to Doppler effect. It absorbs a photon, thus decreasing its momentum. Then the photon is re-emitted with isotropic probability. Using beams in all directions, the net effect is a cooling of the gas. 7

Evaporative cooling The hottest atoms are forced to escape by means of suitable radio frequency transitions Important remark: these cold gases are metastable! The stable configuration is a solid phase. But, in order to reach the solid phase, inelastic collisions between atoms (at least three-body) must occur. Such collisions are rare if the gas is dilute. Of course, one cannot confine the gas within a box with solid surfaces: collisions with material walls would quickly kill the gas phase. Confinement without walls: magnetic and/or optical trapping inside ultrahigh vacuum chambers. 8

Magnetic confinement Atoms have magnetic moment and hence they feel an external magnetic field. The field can be designed such to produce harmonic confinement around a minimum. Optical confinement The dipole force between atoms and a light field (interaction of the induced atomic dipole moment with the intensity gradient of the light field) can be used to produce attractive or repulsive optical dipole potentials for atoms in a far-detuned light. 9

Most traps are harmonic, but laser beams of various shapes and geometries can be used to produce different confining potentials, like optical lattices Most traps are harmonic, but laser beams of various shapes and geometries can be used to produce different confining potentials, like optical lattices, toroidal traps 10

Most traps are harmonic, but laser beams of various shapes and geometries can be used to produce different confining potentials, like optical lattices, toroidal traps, square-like boxes, etc. So, trap the (bosonic) atoms and cool them down to BEC from classical particles to matter waves (Taken from W. Ketterle) 11

First 87 Rb condensate at Jila, Boulder, 1995 First images of BEC with Rb atoms (JILA 1995) 12

thermal only thermal both thermal and BEC only BEC Temperature is measured by fitting the tails of the thermal component! Many more condensates 1996: 7 Li (Rice) 1997: 87 Rb (Texas, Stanford, Konstanz), 23 Na (Rowland Inst), 1998: 87 Rb (Munich, Hannover, Sussex, Kyoto, Paris, Paris, Otago), H (MIT), 23 Na (NIST) 1999: 87 Rb (Firenze, Oxford, Pisa, Amsterdam) 2000: 87 Rb (Tokyo) 2001: 87 Rb (2 in USA, Germany, Munich, Tokyo, Camberra, Tuebingen, Paris, Weizmann), 7 Li (Paris), 41 K (Firenze), He* (Paris) then 85 Rb, Cs, Yb, Cr, Dy, Er, Sr, Li 2, Na 2, Cs 2 and mixtures. and fermions too 13

Why alkali atoms first? Goal: increase the phase space density to reach a regime of quantum degeneracy. Steps: Laser cooling (pre-cooling stage) + evaporative cooling Efficent laser cooling with: hydrogen, helium, alkali atoms, metastable rare gases, earth-alkali atoms, etc. Efficent evaporative cooling if good collisions (elastic collisions necessary for evaporation and thermalization) dominates over bad collisions (atom losses due to two- and three-body inelastic collisions). Alkali atoms are the best!! Why BEC is important? Paradigm of statistical mechanics (phase transition in the absence of interactions). Exact description of the effects of interactions for dilute gases. Fundamental concepts (long range order; spontaneous symmetry breaking; etc.) which play an important role in many areas of physics. and moreover the observation of BEC opened new prospects in Physics: cold atoms as a tool for new advances in atomic physics, quantum optics, quantum technologies, quantum simulations, 14

and also exciton-polariton condensates, of course! (taken from Debbie Jin) Some relevant properties of BEC Those due to interaction: - sound propagation and collective oscillations - solitary waves Those due to phase coherence: - interference - atom laser Superfluid properties (interaction + coherence): - viscousless motion - quantized vortices - Josephson effect - second sound Quantum phase transitions: - Superfluid - Mott insulator - Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless -... 15

BEC in noninteracting gases Occupation number of single-particle states: The value of µ is fixed by normalization condition n i = 1 exp[(ε i µ) / k B T ] 1 i n i = N where H 0 φ i = ε i φ i BEC starts when the chemical potential is so close to ε 0 that (ε 0 µ) << k B T and the occupation number of i=0 state (n 0 N 0 ) becomes large and comparable to N: kbt N0 >> 1 ε µ 0 µ ε 1 ε 0 BEC in noninteracting gases Occupation number of single-particle states: The value of µ is fixed by normalization condition n i = 1 exp[(ε i µ) / k B T ] 1 i n i = N where H 0 φ i = ε i φ i If ε i 0 µ >> ε µ for i>0, one can replace µ with ε 0 in the above expression and the occupation number of i-state does not depend any more on N! 1 Mechanism of BEC: N = N0 + i 0 exp[( ε ε ) / k T ] 1 i 0 B µ ε 1 ε 0 number of atoms N T out of the condensate depends only on T, not on N. The condition N T =N fixes the value of critical temperature 16

BEC in noninteracting gases in 3D harmonic potential H 0 φ i = ε i φ i Single-particle hamiltonian: H 0 = p 2 /2m + V ext Confining potential: V ext = 1 2 m! " ω 2 x x 2 +ω 2 y y 2 +ω 2 z z 2 # $ Spectrum of eigenstates: Condition for BEC: µ = ε(0, 0, 0) N T = n x,n y,n z 0 ε(n x, n y, n z ) = (n x + 1 2 ) ω x + (n y + 1 2 ) ω y + (n z + 1 2 ) ω z 1 exp[β (ω x n x +ω y n y +ω z n z )] 1 BEC in noninteracting gases in 3D harmonic potential N T = n x,n y,n z 0 1 exp[β (ω x n x +ω y n y +ω z n z )] 1 If k B T >> ω i then one can transform the discrete sum into an integral (semiclassical approximation). The integration gives! N T = k T $ B # & g 3 (1) " % ω ho 3 where ω ho = (ω x ω y ω z ) 1/3 and g 3 (1)=ς(3), with ς(n) Riemann ς function Critical temperature when N T =N, which implies: k B T c = 0.94 ω ho N 1/3 and N 0 (T ) N =1 " $ T # T c 3 % & 17

N 0 (T ) N =1 " $ T # T c 3 % & Condensate fraction measured at JILA (1996) EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE OF PHASE TRANSITION BEC in interacting gases Many-body Hamiltonian: Ĥ = dr ˆΨ $ + (r) 2 2 2m +V (r) 1 & ext ) ˆΨ(r)+ % ( 2 drdr ˆΨ+ (r) ˆΨ + (r)v( r r ) ˆΨ(r) ˆΨ(r) where Ψ ˆ ( r ) and ˆ + Ψ ( r ) are bosonic field operators. one-body density matrix: n (1) (r, r) = ˆΨ + (r) ˆΨ(r) Relevant observables directly related to the one-body density matrix: particle density: n(r) = ˆΨ + (r) ˆΨ(r) = n (1) (r, r) momentum distribution: n(p) = ˆΨ + (p) ˆΨ(p) = (2π ) 3 drds n (1) (R + s / 2, R s / 2)e ip s/ 18

momentum distribution: n(p) = (2π ) 3 BEC in interacting gases drds n (1) (R + s / 2, R s / 2)e ip s/ In uniform systems n (1) (r, r) = n (1) (s) = 1 V dpn(p)eips/ Usual situation: n(p) is smooth function n (1) (s) s = 0 However, the occurrence of BEC in noninteracting gases suggests that the p=0 state (lowest single-particle state in the uniform system) can be macroscopically occupied below a given critical temperature T c. In terms of momentum distribution this means: n(p) = N 0 δ(p)+ n(p) BEC Smooth function BEC in interacting gases n ( p) = N ( ) ~ 0δ p + n ( p) n (1) ( s) = n = s 0 N V Off-diagonal long range order (Landau, Lifschitz, Penrose, Onsager) 0 Example of calculation of density matrix in highly correlated many-body system: liquid He4 (Ceperley, Pollock 1987) T << T C T > T C condensate fraction 19

BEC in interacting gases nonuniform systems: same concept, but in a more general form. Starting from the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the one-body density matrix. dr n (1) (r, r)φ i (r) = n i φ i (r) n (1) (r, r) = n i φ * i (r)φ i (r) i BEC occurs when n o N 0 >> 1 Single-particle occupation numbers If this happens, then it is convenient to rewrite the density matrix by separating the contribution arising from the condensate: n (1) (r, r) = N 0 φ * 0 (r)φ 0 (r)+ n i φ * i (r)φ i (r) i 0 For large N the sum tends to zero at large distances. Conversely, the first term remains finite even at large r-r, where one recovers the concept of long range order. But the diagonalization of the density matrix works even for finite systems!! The condensate can be identified with the eigenfunction having the largest eigenvalue (of order N). BEC in interacting gases Example of diagonalization of the one-body density matrix: 4 He droplets. [Lewart, Pandharipande and Pieper, Phys. Rev. B (1988)] Note: In bulk superfluid helium the condensate fraction is of the order of 0.1. In the droplet, the condensate fractions is locally larger near the surface, where the system is more dilute. 20

Order parameter and Gross-Pitaevskii equation Order parameter Starting from the definition of n (1) n (1) (r, r) = ˆΨ + (r) ˆΨ(r) and using its eigenfunctions dr n (1) (r, r)φ i (r) = n i φ i (r) n (1) (r, r) = n i φ * i (r)φ i (r) i one can define annihilation and creation operators aˆ, ˆ + i a i such that [â i, â j + ] = δ ij [â i, â j ] = 0 â j+â i = δ ij n i and ˆΨ(r) = φ i (r)â ˆΨ+ i i (r) = φ * + i (r)â i i 21

Order parameter Separating the condensate in n (1) n (1) (r, r) = N 0 φ 0 * (r)φ 0 (r)+ is equivalent to writing ˆΨ(r) = φ 0 (r)â 0 + i 0 i 0 φ i (r)â i n i φ i * (r)φ i (r) into the definition n (1) (r, r) = ˆΨ + (r) ˆΨ(r) Key point! If the system exhibits BEC, then â 0+â 0 = n 0 = N 0 >>1 while [â 0, â 0 + ] =1 This means that the noncommutativity of these operators is inessential for most physical properties. â 0, â 0 + can be replaced by c-numbers N 0 Order parameter ˆΨ(r) = φ 0 (r)â 0 + i 0 φ i (r)â i becomes ˆΨ(r) = Ψ 0 (r)+δ ˆΨ(r) with Ψ 0 (r) = N 0 φ 0 (r) Condensate wave function (order parameter) δ ˆΨ(r) = i 0 φ i (r)â i non-condensed part (operator) Under certain conditions the non-condensed part is small and the field operator can be approximated with a classical field. One can also write Ψ 0 (r) = ˆΨ 22

Order parameter The order parameter is Ψ 0 (r) = N 0 φ 0 (r) It can be written as Ψ 0 = Ψ 0 e is Order parameter The order parameter is Ψ 0 (r) = N 0 φ 0 (r) It can be written as Ψ 0 = Ψ 0 e is Is it a solution of a Schrödinger-like equation? Starting point: equation of motion for the field operator i ˆΨ = [ ˆΨ, t Ĥ ] i t & ˆΨ(r,t) = 2 2 ( 2m +V (r)+ ext dr ˆΨ+ (r,t)v( r r ) ˆΨ(r,t) ) + ˆΨ(r,t) * 23

Equation for the order parameter i t & ˆΨ(r,t) = 2 2 ( 2m +V (r)+ ext dr ˆΨ+ (r,t)v( r r ) ˆΨ(r,t) ) + ˆΨ(r,t) * This is an equation for the field operator. But we want something for the classical field Ψ 0 (r,t) = ˆΨ(r,t) Delicate issue: replacing the field operator with the classical field (order parameter) in the interaction term requires a proper procedure. Equation for the order parameter i t & ˆΨ(r,t) = 2 2 ( 2m +V (r)+ ext dr ˆΨ+ (r,t)v( r r ) ˆΨ(r,t) ) + ˆΨ(r,t) * A simple and correct procedure is applicable (in 3D) if The range of interaction and s-wave scattering length a are much smaller than the average distance d between particles Temperature is sufficiently low. Macroscopic variations of the order parameter are considered (variations over distances much larger than a). Only low energy two-body scattering properties are relevant for describing the many-body problem. 24

Equation for the order parameter i t & ˆΨ(r,t) = 2 2 ( 2m +V (r)+ ext dr ˆΨ+ (r,t)v( r r ) ˆΨ(r,t) ) + ˆΨ(r,t) * Only low energy two-body scattering properties are relevant for describing the many-body problem. The scattering length a is the only relevant interaction parameter!! The equation for order parameter is obtained by substituting Ψ 0 (r,t) = ˆΨ(r,t) and by replacing V with the effective potential V eff = gδ(r r) with g = 4π 2 a / m Equation for the order parameter i t Ψ (r,t) = % 2 2 0 2m +V (r)+ g Ψ (r,t) ( 2 ext 0 * Ψ 0 (r,t) & ) Gross-Pitaevskii equation density: n (r,t) = Ψ 0 (r,t) 2 It requires that: ü The gas is dilute (quantum fluctuations are negligible) ü The temperature is low (thermal fluctuations are negligible) na 3 <<1 T << T C It is equivalent to: ü treating the field operator like a classical field ˆΨ(r) = Ψ 0 (r)+δ ˆΨ(r) 25

Equation for the order parameter i t Ψ (r,t) = % 2 2 0 2m +V (r)+ g Ψ (r,t) ( 2 ext 0 * Ψ 0 (r,t) & ) Gross-Pitaevskii equation For non dilute gases and/or finite T one has n(r,t) n 0 (r,t) = Ψ 0 (r,t) 2 and the problem becomes harder GP i t Ψ (r,t) = % 2 2 0 2m +V (r)+ g Ψ (r,t) ( 2 ext 0 * Ψ 0 (r,t) & ) Now, some remarks on this equation 26

GP i t Ψ (r,t) = % 2 2 0 2m +V (r)+ g Ψ (r,t) ( 2 ext 0 * Ψ 0 (r,t) & ) Remark #1 GP equation for order parameter is analog to Maxwell equations in classical electrodynamics. Condensate wave function represents classical limit of de Broglie wave (corpuscolar nature of matter no longer important). Difference : GP contains Planck constant explicitly, Maxwell doesn t. This follows from the different dispersion laws of photons and atoms: from particles to waves: p k, E ω photons atoms E = cp E = p 2 / 2m particles (energy) ω = ck ω = k 2 / 2m waves (frequency) GP i t Ψ (r,t) = % 2 2 0 2m +V (r)+ g Ψ (r,t) ( 2 ext 0 * Ψ 0 (r,t) & ) Remark #2 GP equation is nonlinear. It is a special case of nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) widely used in many fields. It shares many analogies with the physics of nonlinear optics. The equation for the order parameter is not an equation for a wave function and the solution is not a wave function in the usual QM sense (e.g., no linear superposition). It is sometimes called macroscopic wave function or condensate wave function. It must not be confused with the many-body wave function Ψ r, r,..., ; ) N ( 1 2 r N t The nonlinearity comes from interparticle interactions, which are represented by a mean-field potential energy in the effective hamiltonian. 27

GP i t Ψ (r,t) = % 2 2 0 2m +V (r)+ g Ψ (r,t) ( 2 ext 0 * Ψ 0 (r,t) & ) Remark #3 The solution is a complex function, with modulus and phase. The energy of the system does not depend on phases, but the condensate has a well defined phase. This can be viewed as an example of broken gauge symmetry. Be careful: in finite systems neither Long Range Order or Broken Gauge Symmetry are applicable concepts, strictly speaking, but the order parameter of the condensate is still well defined (eigenfunction of the one-body density matrix). The phase of the order parameter is crucial for superfluidity. GP i t Ψ (r,t) = % 2 2 0 2m +V (r)+ g Ψ (r,t) ( 2 ext 0 * Ψ 0 (r,t) & ) Remark #4 The GP equation can be also obtained from the least action principle % * δ i Ψ 0 t Ψ 0 drdt + & ( Edt ) * = 0 which yields i t Ψ 0 = δe δψ 0 * where # E = dr 2 2m Ψ 0(r) 2 +V ext (r) Ψ 0 (r) 2 + g 2 Ψ & % 0(r) 4 ( $ Gross-Pitaevskii energy functional 28

I emphasized the basic physics of GP equation because: Ø The GP theory is exact in some limits Ø The GP equation has been widely and successfully used for BECs Ø Several generalizations of GP equations are currently used in different contexts: finite T, strongly interacting bosons, mixtures, and even fermions! [ But take care of ckecking what is supposed to be exact, approximate or just qualitative! ] What next: Statics and dynamics of BECs with GP equation 29