Greg Andreev and Aravind Vijayaraghavan 9/27/13

Similar documents
Intrinsic Electronic Transport Properties of High. Information

Supplementary Figure 1: Micromechanical cleavage of graphene on oxygen plasma treated Si/SiO2. Supplementary Figure 2: Comparison of hbn yield.

Optimizing Graphene Morphology on SiC(0001)

Graphene films on silicon carbide (SiC) wafers supplied by Nitride Crystals, Inc.

Supplementary Figure S1. AFM images of GraNRs grown with standard growth process. Each of these pictures show GraNRs prepared independently,

A BIT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE THEN PHYSICS

Supplementary information for Tunneling Spectroscopy of Graphene-Boron Nitride Heterostructures

GRAPHENE ON THE Si-FACE OF SILICON CARBIDE USER MANUAL

Graphene FETs EE439 FINAL PROJECT. Yiwen Meng Su Ai

Wafer-scale fabrication of graphene

Overview. Carbon in all its forms. Background & Discovery Fabrication. Important properties. Summary & References. Overview of current research

Program Operacyjny Kapitał Ludzki SCANNING PROBE TECHNIQUES - INTRODUCTION

Supplementary Figure 1 Experimental setup for crystal growth. Schematic drawing of the experimental setup for C 8 -BTBT crystal growth.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

TRANSVERSE SPIN TRANSPORT IN GRAPHENE

Supporting information

Accurate thickness measurement of graphene

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

TEOS characterization of 2D materials from graphene to TMDCs

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supporting Information. by Hexagonal Boron Nitride

Graphene and Carbon Nanotubes

Supplementary Information for

Carbon based Nanoscale Electronics

Surface Transfer Doping of Diamond by Organic Molecules

Transparent Electrode Applications

Instrumentation and Operation

Electronic states on the surface of graphite

Module 26: Atomic Force Microscopy. Lecture 40: Atomic Force Microscopy 3: Additional Modes of AFM

Monolayer Semiconductors

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

An account of our efforts towards air quality monitoring in epitaxial graphene on SiC

GRAPHENE the first 2D crystal lattice

Graphene Novel Material for Nanoelectronics

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Spatially resolving density-dependent screening around a single charged atom in graphene

Physics in two dimensions in the lab

Special Properties of Au Nanoparticles

b imaging by a double tip potential

Initial Stages of Growth of Organic Semiconductors on Graphene

Supplementary Figure 1. Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) of bilayer graphene and tblg. (a) AB

Supporting information. Gate-optimized thermoelectric power factor in ultrathin WSe2 single crystals

Noncontact-AFM (nc-afm)

A. Optimizing the growth conditions of large-scale graphene films

Supplementary Materials to Addressable Photo-Charging of Single Quantum Dots Assisted with Atomic Force Microscopy Probe

SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Supplementary Note 1: Fabrication of Scanning Thermal Microscopy Probes

Figure 1: Graphene release, transfer and stacking processes. The graphene stacking began with CVD

Carbon Nanomaterials

Supplementary Figure 1: MoS2 crystals on WSe2-EG and EG and WSe2 crystals on MoSe2-EG and EG.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Basic Laboratory. Materials Science and Engineering. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

STM: Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

Supplemental material: Transient thermal characterization of suspended monolayer MoS 2

Correlated 2D Electron Aspects of the Quantum Hall Effect

The Low Temperature Physics of Thin Films Superconducting Tin and Monolayer Graphene

Graphite, graphene and relativistic electrons

Supplementary Figure 1 Dark-field optical images of as prepared PMMA-assisted transferred CVD graphene films on silicon substrates (a) and the one

Frictional characteristics of exfoliated and epitaxial graphene

Supplementary Figure 1 Magneto-transmission spectra of graphene/h-bn sample 2 and Landau level transition energies of three other samples.

Graphene FETs with Combined Structure and Transparent Top

Wafer Scale Homogeneous Bilayer Graphene Films by. Chemical Vapor Deposition

background (the broad feature running bottom left to top right is a smooth depression 100 pm deep).

Dopant Concentration Measurements by Scanning Force Microscopy

Outline Scanning Probe Microscope (SPM)

CVD-3 MFSIN-HU-1 SiN x Mixed Frequency Process

NiCl2 Solution concentration. Etching Duration. Aspect ratio. Experiment Atmosphere Temperature. Length(µm) Width (nm) Ar:H2=9:1, 150Pa

Paolo Bondavalli NANOCARB Unité mixte de Recherche Thales/CNRS

DEPOSITION OF THIN TiO 2 FILMS BY DC MAGNETRON SPUTTERING METHOD

Graphene Fundamentals and Emergent Applications

General concept and defining characteristics of AFM. Dina Kudasheva Advisor: Prof. Mary K. Cowman

BDS2016 Tutorials: Local Dielectric Spectroscopy by Scanning Probes

Graphene. Tianyu Ye November 30th, 2011

Electrical characterization of silicon heterojunctions and silicon micro/nanowires for solar cells applications

Lecture 1. OUTLINE Basic Semiconductor Physics. Reading: Chapter 2.1. Semiconductors Intrinsic (undoped) silicon Doping Carrier concentrations

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Electronic Supplementary Information. Molecular Antenna Tailored Organic Thin-film Transistor for. Sensing Application

Supporting Information

Large Storage Window in a-sinx/nc-si/a-sinx Sandwiched Structure

Empowering today s nanoscale research with Peak Force Tapping

High-resolution Characterization of Organic Ultrathin Films Using Atomic Force Microscopy

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

CVD-3 LFSIN SiN x Process

Supporting Information

Graphene electronics

Epitaxial Graphene and Graphene Based Devices Studied by Electrical Scanning Probe Microscopy

Ambipolar bistable switching effect of graphene

2D MBE Activities in Sheffield. I. Farrer, J. Heffernan Electronic and Electrical Engineering The University of Sheffield

Supplementary Figure S1. AFM characterizations and topographical defects of h- BN films on silica substrates. (a) (c) show the AFM height

Kavli Workshop for Journalists. June 13th, CNF Cleanroom Activities

A semiconductor is an almost insulating material, in which by contamination (doping) positive or negative charge carriers can be introduced.

Supporting Information Available:

ConceptGraphene. Small or medium-scale focused research project. WP2 Characterization and integration

Quantum Hall effect and Landau level crossing of Dirac fermions in trilayer graphene Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM)

Review of Semiconductor Fundamentals

(a) (b) Supplementary Figure 1. (a) (b) (a) Supplementary Figure 2. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

6.5 mm. ε = 1%, r = 9.4 mm. ε = 3%, r = 3.1 mm

Supporting Information

Transcription:

Mapping Graphene s surface potential with <20nm resolution: A PeakForce KPFM study in a controlled <1ppm water and oxygen environment Greg Andreev and Aravind Vijayaraghavan 9/27/13

Webinar Outline Introduction to Graphene by Aravind Introduction to PF-KPFM Results on Graphene in Air and Glovebox Questions Potential 100mV 250nm -100mV 2

An introduction to graphene and the importance of environment Dr. Aravind Vijayaraghavan The University of Manchester Bruker Webinar "Mapping Graphene s Surface Potential with less than 20nm Resolution"

WHAT IS GRAPHENE Graphene is imensional Buckyballs Carbon Nanotubes Graphite A. K. Geim, K. S. Novoselov Nat Mater 2007, 6, 183.

HOW TO MAKE GRAPHENE 1. Micromechanical cleavage of Graphite (a) Attach a piece of graphite to sticky-tape (Cellotape) (b) Use the sticky tape to thin out the graphite (c) Place the thin graphite on a Silicon wafer, with a surface layer of Silicon Dioxide (d) Remove most layers of graphite leaving behind graphene.

HOW TO MAKE GRAPHENE 2. Chemical Vapour deposition (a)carbon atoms are deposited on the surface of a metal (b)at high temperature this forms graphene. (c) A layer of polymer is deposited on top of the graphene. (d)the polymer is removed and the graphene with it. (e)the polymer is placed on a suitable substrate (f) The polymer is dissolved away leaving the graphene behind.

HOW TO FIND GRAPHENE Seeing is believing! P. Blake, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 063124.

ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE Electronically, monolayer, bilayers and trilayer graphene are electronically distinct materials. Beyond three layers, graphene s electronic properties tends towards that of bulk graphite. Monolayer Graphene T. Ohta, et al., Science 2006, 313, 951.

EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENT Ponomarenko, L. A.; et. al. (2009). Physical Review Letters 102(20): 206603.

EFFECT OF DOPING Schedin, F., et al (2007). Nature Materials, 6(9), 652-655. Changes in resistivity, at zero B caused by graphene s exposure to various gases diluted in concentration to 1 p.p.m. The positive (negative) sign of changes is chosen here to indicate electron (hole) doping. Region I: the device is in vacuum before its exposure; II: exposure to a 5 l volume of a diluted chemical; III: evacuation of the experimental set-up; and IV: annealing at 150 C.

Before getting into KPFM: Lift mode 2nd trace 1st trace Magnetic field source Lift Height Topography LiftMode: Separates topography from the electric/magnetic info: long range vs. short range forces, on active or passive devices. Surface Potential: measure the surface potential together with topography. 3

KPFM basic principle KPFM measures the work function difference of tip/sample. AM FM Amplitude-Modulation Frequency-Modulation Better spatial resolution Better accuracy Physical Review B 2005, 71(12) 125424 4

Many Ways of Doing KPFM FM and PeakForce scaling do not compete Tapping is limited to high k levers due to adhesive forces. PeakForce Tapping k is not. KPFM AFM Tapping PeakForce Both AM & FM KPFM improves with lower k AM FM TP-AM TP-FM PeakForce KPFM-AM PeakForce KPFM *Except TP-FM, all are done in lift-mode. 5

PeakForce KPFM combines FM with PFT Allows for higher sensitivity KKKK SSSSSSSSSSS But Tapping Mode Requires : k to be not too small Q not to be too big Tapping and KPFM scaling in conflict. Q k Peak Force Tapping Mode Allows Freedom to use: Smaller k (10x or more) Big Q (10x or more) PeakForce Tapping and KPFM scaling aligned. 6

KPFM: nanoscale measurement of Work Function, Fermi Energy & Carrier Density Previous work shows Work Function relationship to E fermi for Graphene Bilayer Single layer Y. Yu et. al. NanoLett. (9) 10 2009 KPFM can be used as a nanoscale measurement of Fermi energy 7

Energy diagram of our KPFM experiment on Graphene Vacuum level W a Approx. Values W tip W tip ~ 4.5eV W smp W 0 gr W elec ~ 4.9eV e VVVV W elec E F W 0 gr ~ 4.6eV W a ~ 0.05eV What KPFM measures E F ~±0.3eV Energy band diagram of 1L Graphene (holedoped) 8

Our sample: Single layer Graphene on a Silicon Nitride window 14.5nm AFM 1um Optical Microscope (Blue filter) 25um SiN window 1L Graphene 0nm SiN window 1L Graphene Why this sample? Largely insulating substrate KPFM should probe only Graphene, little crosstalk Roughness may create interesting inhomogeneities 9 Au

Results (in Air): PF-KPFM on Graphene shows incredible contrast AFM Linear debris clearly visible 1um Potential Linear debris does not show up! 500mV <40nm gap b/n layers barely visible in Height <40nm gap b/n layers clearly visible -200mV Hole doping of Graphene confirmed, W g ~ 4.85V Signs of incredible nanoscale contrast, is it real? 10

Lift height dependence: a way to check for topographic artificats in KPFM Example From Bruker App. note #140 11

Proof of real contrast: evolution of PF- KPFM resolution w/ lift height Lift Height 28nm 40nm 50nm 75nm 1um No sudden loss of resolution = contrast not due to tip sticking 12

Let s zoom in on an interesting region.. 1um 14.5nm 13 0nm

Zooming in: how homogeneous is Graphene? Height 250nm 11nm Adhesion 11nN 0nm 6nN Substrate residue easily picked up by Adhesion channel Will it have some effect on Graphene s work function? 14

PF-KPFM of zoomed-in region: <20nm resolution reveals inhomogeneities Potential, z = 28nm +100mV Similar result to previous work: 4.85V 250nm 15-100mV 100mV 50mV 20nm wide hump resolved! 0mV J. Martin et. al. Nature 2007 15

Bruker PF-KPFM: inhomogeneities correlate with high potential Adhesion 11nN Adhesion+High Potential 11nN 6nN 6nN PF-KPFM adhesion channel makes it easy to see the inhomogeneities! Is the doping mechanism here also related to Water + Oxygen as in previous work? scale bar = 250nm 16

What is the effect of the environment on Graphene doping? Water? Oxygen? Is it reversible? An environmentally controlled measurement is needed.. Cryogenic UHV KPFM would be great, but difficult/costly Is there an easier way to study Graphene in a H2O+O2 free environment? 17

Unique Bruker technology: Glovebox Integrated System Argon Atmosphere, <1ppm H2O, 1ppm O2 Antechamber for introducing samples, pressure below 1E-6mbar 18

Physical picture: what we expect to happen Ambient GloveBox Vacuum level W a W elec W smp W 0 gr E F W tip e VVVV E F Graphene is hole doped by Water and Oxygen Water and Oxygen removed, Graphene nearly intrinsic Potential for studying nearly-intrinsic Graphene without Cryogenics or UHV 19

Physical picture confirmed: PF-KPFM in GloveBox shows lower contrast Ambient 500mV GloveBox 150mV -200mV Contrast between Graphene and SiN greatly reduced -150mV Spatial inhomogeneities in Graphene also reduced 20

Physical picture confirmed: PF-KPFM in GloveBox shows lower contrast Ambient 500mV GloveBox (same scale) 500mV -200mV -200mV Graphene signal is nearly that of an insulator 21

Inhomogeneities greatly reduced in Glovebox Air +100mV Glovebox +100mV Potential 4.85V ~4.6V -100mV 250nm -100mV AFM 22

Another sample: larger KPFM scan Potential in Air Three vastly different potentials for Graphene? SiN Au Graphene 250-470mV 93mV Graphene SiN Au 23

KPFM Potential, in Glovebox before vacuum SiN/chuck 334mV 133mV Graphene Au Au SiN Graphene Glovebox environment reduced Graphene workfunction by ~100mV KPFM Potential, in Glovebox after vacuum 284mV 193mV W g ~ 4.7eV near Au contact, smaller farther away 24

Conclusion PF-KPFM s spatial resolution is great: 20nm resolution images are achievable on Graphene PF-KPFM is sensitive: ~10meV sensitivity allows to easily distinguish inhomogeneities Glovebox Integrated System is a convenient promising environment for reducing Graphene s work function to nearly intrinsic levels. 25

Backup slides 26

Tip Cone Contribution in KPFM FM gradient detection isolates contribution from tip Cone Contribution% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% FM z=10 nm FM z=50 nm AM z=10 nm 0% 0% 0% 1% AM 10% z=50 nm 100% Height Inclusion (h/h)% Based on SCM-PIT Geometry: W=30um, L=225um, H=10um, Cone Angle=45 FM-KPFM: The foremost 0.3% of the tip cone accounts for half of the signal in. FM can achieve a lateral resolution better than 50nm. AM-KPFM The contribution from the tip cone never reaches 50%. Its lateral resolution is dictated by the um-scale lever. 27