Lecture 8. PID control. Industrial process control ( today) PID control. Insights about PID actions

Similar documents
Lecture 4. Chapter 11 Nise. Controller Design via Frequency Response. G. Hovland 2004

Lecture 5 Introduction to control

Lecture 8 - SISO Loop Design

ECE 3510 Root Locus Design Examples. PI To eliminate steady-state error (for constant inputs) & perfect rejection of constant disturbances

MM1: Basic Concept (I): System and its Variables

ME 375 FINAL EXAM Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Digital Control System

Wolfgang Hofle. CERN CAS Darmstadt, October W. Hofle feedback systems

Chapter 9: Controller design. Controller design. Controller design

Root Locus Contents. Root locus, sketching algorithm. Root locus, examples. Root locus, proofs. Root locus, control examples

376 CHAPTER 6. THE FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN METHOD. D(s) = we get the compensated system with :

ME 375 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Friday December 17, 2004

Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 7. Steady-State Errors ) Prof. Kwang-Chun Ho Tel: Fax:

G(s) = 1 s by hand for! = 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 rad/sec.

EE Control Systems LECTURE 14

Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Modeling, Dynamics and Control III Spring 2002

Homework 12 Solution - AME30315, Spring 2013

Gain and Phase Margins Based Delay Dependent Stability Analysis of Two- Area LFC System with Communication Delays

Module 4: Time Response of discrete time systems Lecture Note 1

MODERN CONTROL SYSTEMS

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN OF STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS AND STATE OBSERVERS USING REDUCED ORDER MODEL

SKEE 3143 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN. CHAPTER 3 Compensator Design Using the Bode Plot

Lecture 10 Filtering: Applied Concepts

Compensation Techniques

ECEN620: Network Theory Broadband Circuit Design Fall 2018

Solutions. Digital Control Systems ( ) 120 minutes examination time + 15 minutes reading time at the beginning of the exam

S_LOOP: SINGLE-LOOP FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

The Root Locus Method

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Root Locus Analysis

Lecture 6: Resonance II. Announcements

into a discrete time function. Recall that the table of Laplace/z-transforms is constructed by (i) selecting to get

Design of Digital Filters

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY School of Engineering Science ENSC 320 Electric Circuits II. Solutions to Assignment 3 February 2005.

March 18, 2014 Academic Year 2013/14

Given the following circuit with unknown initial capacitor voltage v(0): X(s) Immediately, we know that the transfer function H(s) is

ECE-320 Linear Control Systems. Spring 2014, Exam 1. No calculators or computers allowed, you may leave your answers as fractions.

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Design By Emulation (Indirect Method)

Control Systems Analysis and Design by the Root-Locus Method

THE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL TWO-DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM SEMISTRONGLY STABILIZING CONTROLLERS. Tatsuya Hoshikawa, Kou Yamada and Yuko Tatsumi

Analysis of Stability &

Exercises for lectures 19 Polynomial methods

The state variable description of an LTI system is given by 3 1O. Statement for Linked Answer Questions 3 and 4 :

Then C pid (s) S h -stabilizes G(s) if and only if Ĉpid(ŝ) S 0 - stabilizes Ĝ(ŝ). For any ρ R +, an RCF of Ĉ pid (ŝ) is given by

Root Locus Diagram. Root loci: The portion of root locus when k assume positive values: that is 0

6.447 rad/sec and ln (% OS /100) tan Thus pc. the testing point is s 3.33 j5.519

Multivariable Control Systems

MM7. PID Control Design

EE105 - Fall 2005 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits

NAME (pinyin/italian)... MATRICULATION NUMBER... SIGNATURE

5.5 Application of Frequency Response: Signal Filters

arxiv: v1 [cs.sy] 24 May 2018

CONTROL OF INTEGRATING PROCESS WITH DEAD TIME USING AUTO-TUNING APPROACH

Lecture #9 Continuous time filter

Chapter 7. Root Locus Analysis

16.400/453J Human Factors Engineering. Manual Control II

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

The loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)

A Simple Approach to Synthesizing Naïve Quantized Control for Reference Tracking

EE/ME/AE324: Dynamical Systems. Chapter 8: Transfer Function Analysis

1 Routh Array: 15 points

Chapter 13. Root Locus Introduction

Stability. ME 344/144L Prof. R.G. Longoria Dynamic Systems and Controls/Lab. Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin

What lies between Δx E, which represents the steam valve, and ΔP M, which is the mechanical power into the synchronous machine?

CONTROL SYSTEMS. Chapter 2 : Block Diagram & Signal Flow Graphs GATE Objective & Numerical Type Questions

Fractional-Order PI Speed Control of a Two-Mass Drive System with Elastic Coupling

J. Electrical Systems 8-1 (2012): Regular paper

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2004 Homework 4 Solution November 14,

POWER SYSTEM SMALL SIGNAL STABILITY ANALYSIS BASED ON TEST SIGNAL

ME2142/ME2142E Feedback Control Systems

LOW ORDER MIMO CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR AN ENGINE DISTURBANCE REJECTION PROBLEM. P.Dickinson, A.T.Shenton

Behavioral thermal modeling for quad-core microprocessors

A Simplified Methodology for the Synthesis of Adaptive Flight Control Systems

FRTN10 Exercise 3. Specifications and Disturbance Models

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dynamics and Control II

( 1) EE 313 Linear Signals & Systems (Fall 2018) Solution Set for Homework #10 on Laplace Transforms

USING NONLINEAR CONTROL ALGORITHMS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF SHAKING TABLE TESTS

Chapter 10. Closed-Loop Control Systems

Chapter 2: Problem Solutions

Chapter 2 Sampling and Quantization. In order to investigate sampling and quantization, the difference between analog

Contents lecture 4. Automatic Control III. Summary of lecture 3 (II/II) Summary of lecture 3 (I/II) Lecture 4 Controller structures and control design

Analysis and Design of a Third Order Phase-Lock Loop

Evolutionary Algorithms Based Fixed Order Robust Controller Design and Robustness Performance Analysis

6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 6: Steady-State Errors Prof. Joel L. Dawson S -

Today s Lecture. Block Diagrams. Block Diagrams: Examples. Block Diagrams: Examples. Closed Loop System 06/03/2017

A Comparative Study on Control Techniques of Non-square Matrix Distillation Column

Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. Yves Briere

RaneNote BESSEL FILTER CROSSOVER

Resonant Load Control Methods for Industrial Servo Drives

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE-TRICHY

Function and Impulse Response

Assessment of Performance for Single Loop Control Systems

Linear-Quadratic Control System Design

PI control system design for Electromagnetic Molding Machine based on Linear Programing

Stability regions in controller parameter space of DC motor speed control system with communication delays

CHAPTER 13 FILTERS AND TUNED AMPLIFIERS

A PLC BASED MIMO PID CONTROLLER FOR MULTIVARIABLE INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

On Stability of Electronic Circuits

Homework Assignment No. 3 - Solutions

Feedback Control Systems (FCS)

Transcription:

Lecture 8. PID control. The role of P, I, and D action 2. PID tuning Indutrial proce control (92... today) Feedback control i ued to improve the proce performance: tatic performance: for contant reference, the output aymptotically converge to the deired value, regardle of load diturbance. dynamic performance: enure proper tranient behavior during tep change Proportional control i not ufficient: feedback gain mut be frequency dependent! controller i itelf a dynamical ytem C() Syt3 lecture 8 Syt3 lecture 8 2 PID control Inight about PID action The magical three-term controller (99% of indutrial controller): u = K P e }{{} proportional Frequency interpretation: e + }{{} K D ė }{{} derivative integral +K I C() = K P + K I + K D K I dominate at low frequencie while K D dominate at high frequencie P I D Syt3 lecture 8 3 Syt3 lecture 8 4

Proportional control Frequency domain interpretation: 2 log H Suppoe P() = τ+ and C() = K. Cloed-loop tranfer function: Y R = K +K + +K τ The tatic error and the time contant are divided by ( + K) Feedback modifie the location of the pole. More generally: rlocu how how cloed-loop pole move with K. 2 log( + K) τ τ ( + K) Feedback ditribute the loop tranfer from u to y: trading gain for bandwidth... ω Increaing the bandwidth typically reduce the phae margin. Proportional control uually increae ocillation and overhoot in tep repone. Syt3 lecture 8 5 Syt3 lecture 8 6 Feedback to reduce tatic error r - Y = d e C() u + CP + CP R + P + CP D P() Aymptotic value of tep repone i given by lim t y(t) = lim Y () if ROC(Y ()) include the imaginary axi. For tep input R() = r and D() = d, we obtain y( ) = C()G() + C()G() r G() + + C()G() d r if + C()G() = S() >> y The role of integral feedback Integral action C() ha a pole at =. y( ) = r + d!! a general feature in feedback loop with contant external ignal: modulo tability (tatic regime may not exit!), block that contain a pole at = aymptotically force their input to zero. the property i independent of ytem parameter and linearity aumption! Syt3 lecture 8 7 Syt3 lecture 8 8

Integral feedback Internal model principle: for perfect tracking (rejection), the controller mut include a model of the reference (diturbance) ignal. For tep ignal, the model i. the controller pole at = caue a phae lag of 9deg in the loop tranfer integral action uually reduce the phae margin and increae overhoot Integral feedback a automatic bia adjutment compenate for tatic error if u(t) = Ke(t) + u ff u ff = + KP() With a PI control u(t) = Ke(t) + K I e, the bia i automatically adjuted. Syt3 lecture 8 9 Syt3 lecture 8 Derivative feedback PD control anticipate future error: u(t) = ke(t) + k d ė(t) = k(e(t) + T d ė(t)) ke(t + T d ) Think of pendulum model: u i a torque, y i a poition derivative feedback act a velocity feedback, i.e. a a friction force derivative control add a phae lead of +9deg in the loop tranfer uually increae the phae margin and damp the ocillation of the tep repone Derivative feedback amplifie noie the derivative action act a a noie amplifier require good enor the derivative i uually filtered: T d i replaced by limit the high-frequency gain amplification T d +T d /N to in a digital implementation, dicretizing the derivative feedback can be interpreted a filtering the derivative action i often not ued in proce control Syt3 lecture 8 Syt3 lecture 8 2

PI controller : + T i Set-point weighting G db G PID control i often implemented in the form T i -9 log ω log ω t u(t) = k(βr(t) y(t)) + k i (r y)(τ)dτ + k d (γṙ(t) ẏ(t)) Good for tatic performance but phae lag chooe T i ω B PD controller : + T d G db T d G +9 log ω log ω which correpond to a controller with two degree of freedom: U() = C()(R Y ) + F()R C() i tuned for diturbance rejection and F() i adjuted for reference tracking Phae lead i beneficial to tability margin but the cloed-loop bandwidth i increaed limit T d Syt3 lecture 8 3 Syt3 lecture 8 4 Antiwindup Due to actuator limitation, integral action i never implemented without an antiwindup mechanim. A general tructure for PID control The antiwindup reet the integral action when the input aturate. Syt3 lecture 8 5 Syt3 lecture 8 6

PID tuning control parameter tuning can be interpreted a pole placement for low-order model control parameter tuning can be interpreted a loop haping Special tuning method are model-free: the tuning i intead baed on a few open-loop experiment Many indutrial controller are mituned becaue they are tuned once forever adaptive control or auto-tuning method PI control of a firt order ytem Proce tranfer function Controller tranfer function P() = K τ + C() = k P + k I Cloed loop tranfer function from reference r to output y: Y () R() = CP + CP = K(k P + k I ) τ 2 + ( + Kk P ) + Kk I Cloed loop ytem of econd order; two parameter allow to place the pole of the cloed loop ytem Syt3 lecture 8 7 Syt3 lecture 8 8 PI control of a firt order ytem Example of deign: cancel the (low) proce pole, i.e. k I = τk P and place the cloed loop pole no overhoot, aignment of time contant, no tatic error. Perhap not the bet choice: one hould alo pay attention to the cloed loop tranfer function from the diturbance d to the output y: Y () D() = P + CP = K τ 2 + ( + Kk P ) + Kk I PD control of a econd order ytem Proce tranfer function Controller tranfer function b P() = 2 + a + a 2 C() = k P + k D Cloed loop tranfer function from reference r to output y: Y () R() = CP + CP = b(k D + k P ) 2 + (a + bk D ) + a 2 + bk P Cloed loop ytem of econd order; two parameter allow to place the pole of the cloed loop ytem. Syt3 lecture 8 9 Syt3 lecture 8 2

PD control of a econd order ytem The derivative action will damp the ocillation ( ζ) bk The cloed loop tatic gain i P bk P +a 2. But increaing k P may be harmful to bandwidth. The zero = k P /k D may caue coniderable overhoot if it i cloer to the origin than the dominant pole. PID control of a econd order ytem Proce tranfer function Controller tranfer function b G() = 2 + a + a 2 C() = k P + k D + k I Cloed loop tranfer function from reference r to output y: Y () R() = CG + CG = b(k D 2 + k P + k I ) 3 + (a + bk D ) 2 + (a 2 + bk P ) + bk I Cloed loop ytem of third order; three parameter allow to place the pole of the cloed loop ytem. Intability may occur for bad choice of control parameter! Syt3 lecture 8 2 Syt3 lecture 8 22 A zero in the tranfer function affect the tep repone H new = (z + )H old The location of a zero i NOT affected by feedback. In contrat, feedforward action change the location of zero. Interet of controller with two degree of freedom..2.8.6.4.2.2.4.5.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 new (t) = old (t) + d old z dt (t) zero in left half plane: increae the overhoot a it approache imaginary axi. zero in right-half plane: reponible for invere repone phenomenon. Syt3 lecture 8 23 Syt3 lecture 8 24

Loop haping with PI control Two parameter allow to fix one point on the Nyquit curve. C() = K + T i Chooe K to aign the croover frequency ω c with ufficient phae margin. Maximize T i under the contraint φ m φ min m. Note: A larger T i low down the diturbance rejection. Phae-lag compenation K T i+, > T i + = K T i + T i + = K ( + z), z p + p G db -6-9 ωt i ωt i Static gain i increaed by factor. Phae lag will not affect the phae margin if T i ω C. Synthei guideline: adjut K to aign ω C with ufficient phae margin. Evaluate the neceary reduction of tatic error to chooe ; Maximize T i without degrading the phae margin. Syt3 lecture 8 25 Syt3 lecture 8 26 Loop haping with phae-lead compenator C() = K(T d + ) T d +, < = PD control Low-pa filter = K +z +p, p z G db K K +9 ωt d φ max Limitation of derivative action at high frequency. ωt d Phae-lead compenation Ueful formula: log ω max = 2 φ max = arcin ω max = z p ( log ( )) + log T d T d ( ) + Synthei guideline: Chooe ω c to aign cloed-loop bandwidth. Evaluate the neceary phae lead at ω c (not more than 6 = 6) and adjut T d to place the maximal phae lead at ω C. Chooe K to have L(jω c ) =. Syt3 lecture 8 27 Syt3 lecture 8 28

Summary of lecture PID i widely ued in the indutry. Three parameter roughly correpond to three performance criteria: tatic performance (I), cloed-loop bandwidth (P), and tability margin (D). Implementation of PID control include antiwindup, filtering of the derivative action, and et-point weighting. Syt3 lecture 8 29