EFFECTIVITY PAGE DATE ISSUE PAGE DATE ISSUE PAGE DATE ISSUE 24/07/14 24/07/14

Similar documents
PRELIMINARY PREDICTION OF SPECIMEN PROPERTIES CLT and 1 st order FEM analyses

Stress Analysis and Validation of Superstructure of 15-meter Long Bus under Normal Operation

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. Preliminary Qualifying Examination Solid Mechanics February 25, 2002

FEM Validation. 12th January David Schmid Teamleader Structural Analysis

Spring Elements In Nastran Blog Post pdf

IDE 110 Mechanics of Materials Spring 2006 Final Examination FOR GRADING ONLY

Comparison of Ply-wise Stress-Strain results for graphite/epoxy laminated plate subjected to in-plane normal loads using CLT and ANSYS ACP PrepPost

Finite Element Analysis Of A High-Speed Suspension Boat Fuselage

Impact and Crash Modeling of Composite Structures: A Challenge for Damage Mechanics

Effect of Specimen Dimensions on Flexural Modulus in a 3-Point Bending Test

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

AERSYS KNOWLEDGE UNIT

Initial Stress Calculations

EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY OF OBLIQUE IMPACT ON HELICOPTER BLADES INFLUENCE OF THE CURVATURE

NATURAL FREQUENCIES OF A HONEYCOMB SANDWICH PLATE Revision F. A diagram of a honeycomb plate cross-section is shown in Figure 1.

Plate Forces and Moments Blog Post pdf

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE LIFTING DEVICE DETECTOR SUPPORTS FOR THE LHCb VERTEX LOCATOR (VELO)

Procedure for Performing Stress Analysis by Means of Finite Element Method (FEM)

Telescope Mechanical Design

OPTIMIZATION OF THE COMPOSITE MATERIALS OF TANKS USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND STRAIN GAUGES

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA SCIENCE FOR TECHNICIANS OUTCOME 1 - STATIC AND DYNAMIC FORCES TUTORIAL 3 STRESS AND STRAIN

ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION OF AN AIRPLANE SEAT DURING VERTICAL IMPACTS

Failure analysis of serial pinned joints in composite materials

Finite Element Modeling of an Aluminum Tricycle Frame

SECTION 23 - METRIC DESIGN INFORMATION. Table of Contents

Special edition paper

BTECH MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS. Level 3 Unit 5

and F NAME: ME rd Sample Final Exam PROBLEM 1 (25 points) Prob. 1 questions are all or nothing. PROBLEM 1A. (5 points)

Aircraft Structures Design Example

Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering

PROBLEM #1.1 (4 + 4 points, no partial credit)

Principles of Finite Element for Design Engineers and Analysts. Ayman Shama, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE

MINE ROOF SUPPORT DESIGN AND ANALYSIS. Document no : Revision no : 1.0

COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENT OF A FLEXIBLE COMPOSITE CONNECTING ROD

Lab Exercise #3: Torsion

Direct and Shear Stress

1-1 Locate the centroid of the plane area shown. 1-2 Determine the location of centroid of the composite area shown.

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Optimum Height of Plate Stiffener under Pressure Effect

N = Shear stress / Shear strain

MESH MODELING OF ANGLE-PLY LAMINATED COMPOSITE PLATES FOR DNS AND IPSAP

Mechanics of Materials MENG 270 Fall 2003 Exam 3 Time allowed: 90min. Q.1(a) Q.1 (b) Q.2 Q.3 Q.4 Total

TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SANDWICH BEAMS

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS NQF LEVEL 3 OUTCOME 1 - LOADING SYSTEMS TUTORIAL 3 LOADED COMPONENTS

Finite Element Simulation of Bar-Plate Friction Welded Joints Steel Product Subjected to Impact Loading

Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

σ = F/A ε = L/L σ ε a σ = Eε

Two Tier projects for students in ME 160 class

Response Spectrum Analysis Shock and Seismic. FEMAP & NX Nastran

FE-MODELLING GUIDELINES FOR THE DIMENSIONING OF AIRCRAFT CABIN INTERIOR UNDER STATIONARY DYNAMIC LOADS

Dynamic (Vibrational) and Static Structural Analysis of Ladder Frame

EQUILIBRIUM and ELASTICITY

DISPENSA FEM in MSC. Nastran

Finite element modelling of infinitely wide Angle-ply FRP. laminates

A Repeated Dynamic Impact Analysis for 7x7 Spacer Grids by using ABAQUS/ Standard and Explicit

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

Mechanical Properties of Materials

Vibrationdata FEA Matlab GUI Package User Guide Revision A

Chapter 12. Static Equilibrium and Elasticity

Bending of Simply Supported Isotropic and Composite Laminate Plates

Downloaded from Downloaded from / 1

my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Sample Question Paper

PREDICTION OF OUT-OF-PLANE FAILURE MODES IN CFRP

SPECIAL CONDITION. Water Load Conditions. SPECIAL CONDITION Water Load Conditions

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS

The LAT Electronics consists of five distinct box assemblies as follows:

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

Solution to Multi-axial Fatigue Life of Heterogenic Parts & Components Based on Ansys. Na Wang 1, Lei Wang 2

SOLAR ORBITER ENERGETIC PARTICLE DETECTOR

SKIN-STRINGER DEBONDING AND DELAMINATION ANALYSIS IN COMPOSITE STIFFENED SHELLS

Donald P. Shiley School of Engineering ME 328 Machine Design, Spring 2019 Assignment 1 Review Questions

Design Structural Analysis and Fatigue Calculation of Wing Fuselage Lug Attachment of a Transport Aircraft

International Journal for Ignited Minds (IJIMIINDS) Design and Analysis of Effect of Core Thickness in UAV Wing

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

BIAXIAL STRENGTH INVESTIGATION OF CFRP COMPOSITE LAMINATES BY USING CRUCIFORM SPECIMENS

Table of Contents. Preface...xvii. Part 1. Level

Samantha Ramirez, MSE. Stress. The intensity of the internal force acting on a specific plane (area) passing through a point. F 2

ME FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FORMULAS

VEGA LAUNCH VEHICLE: PAYLOAD FAIRING SEPARATION ANALYSIS

Stress Analysis Lecture 3 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

Aluminum shell. Brass core. 40 in

Hilti North America Installation Technical Manual Technical Data MI System Version

Stress analysis of deflection analysis flexure and obif Vertical Load orientation

PRACTICE 2 PROYECTO Y CONSTRUCCIÓN DE PUENTES. 1º Máster Ingeniería de Caminos. E.T.S.I. Caminos, canales y puertos (Ciudad Real) 01/06/2016

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

Mechanics of Solids. Mechanics Of Solids. Suraj kr. Ray Department of Civil Engineering

Numerical Analysis of Delamination Behavior in Laminated Composite with Double Delaminations Embedded in Different Depth Positions

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Rutgers University Department of Physics & Astronomy. 01:750:271 Honors Physics I Fall Lecture 19. Home Page. Title Page. Page 1 of 36.

MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR OF DAMAGED HDPE GEOMEMBRANES

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF SANDWICH PANELS SUBJECTED TO POINT LOADS

Composite Sandwich Structures with Honeycomb Core subjected to Impact

my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification

Determine the resultant internal loadings acting on the cross section at C of the beam shown in Fig. 1 4a.

Analysis of Shear Lag Effect of Box Beam under Dead Load

Transcription:

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 EFFECTIVITY PAGE DATE ISSUE PAGE DATE ISSUE PAGE DATE ISSUE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 24/7/14 31 32 24/7/14 24/7/14 ILA-655D29826 2/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 INTENTIONALLY BLANK ILA-655D29826 5/32

TABLE OF CONTENTS 173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 TITLE PAGE... 1 EFFECTIVITY... 2 BLANK PAGE... 3 REVISION... 4 BLANK PAGE... 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS... 6 1 INTRODUCTION... 7 1.1. LIST OF DRAWING... 7 1.2. TOOLS OF CALCULATION... 7 1.3. LIST OF REFERENCE... 8 1.4. UNITS... 8 1.5. LIST OF ACRONYMS... 9 1.6. AIRCRAFT REFERENCE SYSTEM AXIS... 1 1.7. AIRCRAFT INTERFACE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES... 11 1.8. LOAD CASES DEFINITION... 11 1.9. CENTER OF GRAVITY... 12 1.1. REARWARD RIGHT GALLEY A13/15-J11 P/N 655D29826 WEIGHT... 13 1.11. MESH GENERATION... 15 1.12. A/C INTERFACE POINTS AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS... 2 1.13. MATERIALS AND FASTENERS MECHANICAL PROPERTIES... 22 1.13.1. Metallic materials... 22 1.13.2. Inserts mechanical properties... 22 1.13.3. Fasteners mechanical properties... 23 1.13.4. Sandwich panels dimensions and composition... 24 1.13.5. Sandwich panels mechanical properties... 3 2... 31 3 CONCLUSION... 32 ILA-655D29826 6/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this analysis is to produce a Interface Load Analysis Report Type of structure: REARWARD RIGHT GALLEY A13/15-J11 Part number: P/N 655D29826 Aircraft: n/a Location: Rwd Right Type of aircraft: ATR 42/72. The results of the analysis are the forces applied on aircraft mechanical interfaces. 1.1. LIST OF DRAWING The finite element model (FEM) of the stowage was performed according to the following drawing: General arrangement drawing: SMRD29826 1.2. TOOLS OF CALCULATION Meshing, solver, pre - and post-processing : Patran 28r2 & Nastran 28 r1a ILA-655D29826 7/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.3. LIST OF REFERENCE Applicable standards - documents references: EASA/CS 25: 25.31 25.33 25.35 25.37 25.561 25.67 25.613 25.625 ATR Technical specifications: DT/MD-59/14 ed 3 421.585-94 ed. 1: ATR 42 & ATR 72 Aménagement cabine new look Spécification technique d'équipements 419.98-9 ed. 19: ATR Spécification technique d'équipements Simair specification: A9 44.28 iss.3: Calculation datas ATR programs CDCC-DT/MD-59/14 iss.: Technical Specification Rearward right galley A13/15-J11 Technical reference book: Airframe Stress Analysis and Sizing, Michael Chun-Yung NIU 1.4. UNITS The units used in this report are: Length mm Mass kg Force N Moment N.mm Stiffness N/mm Pressure MPa (N/mm 2 ) Acceleration translation gravity m/s 2 Density kg/m 3 ILA-655D29826 8/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.5. LIST OF ACRONYMS A/C Aircraft CS e SRW M n x, n y, n z F x F y F z Mx M y M z g G Γ x Γ y Γ z ρ K x K y K z RF SM Rwd Fwd Swd Uwd Dwd Coordinate System Thickness Simulated Reconstituted Weight Mass Load factors Load Load Load Load Load Load Acceleration translation gravity Acceleration translation gravity Acceleration translation gravity Acceleration translation gravity Acceleration translation gravity Density Stiffness Stiffness Stiffness Reserve Factor Safety Margin Rearward Forward Sideward Upward Downward ILA-655D29826 9/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.6. AIRCRAFT REFERENCE SYSTEM AXIS The loading directions are given in Aircraft axes. +X: -X: +Y: -Y: +Z: -Z: REARWARD direction FORWARD direction RIGHT direction LEFT direction UP direction DOWN direction ILA-655D29826 1/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.7. AIRCRAFT INTERFACE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES Following values are extracted from document ref. A9 44.28 iss.3, 5. Lower attachments on seat tracks Kx = 15 N/mm Ky = 15 N/mm Kz = 5 N/mm Upper attachments with tie rod 15 N/mm in rod axis direction Table 1.7-1: Aircraft interface stiffness 1.8. LOAD CASES DEFINITION Ultimate loads for cabin furniture are extracted from document ref. CDCC-AJ-DT-MD-59-14 iss., Appendix A. Load case number Max flight and landing loads description 1 3.2g Upward 2 9.g Forward 3 3.g Sideward RH 4 3.g Sideward LH 5 7.8g Downward 6 2.1g Rearward 7 8 8.6g Fwd + 1.5g Swd RH + 2.g Uwd 8.6g Fwd + 1.5g Swd LH + 2.g Uwd 9 ABUSE LOAD (1) Table 1.8-1: Load cases description (1) An abuse load is considered to substantiate the mechanical behavior of the sliding table (see 1.1). This table must support a maximum loading of 4Kg modeled applying a equally distributed pressure on its surface and oriented down. ILA-655D29826 11/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.9. CENTER OF GRAVITY The estimated coordinates of the center of gravity for Rearward right galley A13/15-J11 P/N 655D29826 are provided in the aircraft axis by the Table 1.9-1. Nota: Internal equipments are represented by pressure loads on compartment surfaces (see 1.1), so the CoG location for galley with loading depends on which compartment face loads are applied. Then the CoG with loading determined below is the average location. CoG coordinate Without loadings With loadings (mm) (mm) CoG X coordinate 21455 21439 CoG Y coordinate 667 66 CoG Z coordinate 314 3259 Table 1.9-1: Coordinates of center of gravity in global system aircraft. ILA-655D29826 12/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.1. REARWARD RIGHT GALLEY A13/15-J11 P/N 655D29826 WEIGHT All internal equipments of the REARWARD RIGHT GALLEY A13/15-J11 P/N 655D29826 and their masses are detailed in the following Figure 1.1-1, Table 1.1-1 and Table 1.1-2. This finite element modeling was done with a total mass of 427.6 kg. 4 1 7 15 13 2 3 5 14 6 8 1 12 9 16 11 Figure 1.1-1: Internal equipments location ILA-655D29826 13/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 ITEM DESIGNATION CAPACITIES Qty STRUCTURAL WEIGHT 8 kg 1 1 HOT-JUG 18 kg 1 2 WORKING AREA 2 kg 1 3 WATER-HEATER 1.6 kg 1 4 STOWAGE 3 kg 1 5 BASIN - 1 7 WATER TANK 2 kg 1 8 HALF-SIZE TROLLEY 6 kg 1 9 HALF-SIZE TROLLEY 6 kg 1 1 DF 115 OVEN 51 kg 1 11 STOWAGE 12 kg 1 12 WASTE BIN 1 kg 1 13 SU 2 kg 1 14 SU 2 kg 1 15 STOWAGE 3 kg 1 EXTERNAL WEIGHT (STOWAGE) 4 kg 1 TOTAL WEIGHT 427.6 kg TOTAL WEIGHT WITHOUT TROLLEY 37.6 kg Table 1.1-1: Weight description of internal equipments The maximum loading of the two tables are given by the Table 1.1-2. TABLES MAXIMUM LOADING ITEM DESIGNATION CAPACITIES Qty 6 FOLDING TABLE 4 kg 1 16 SLIDING TABLE 4 kg 1 Table 1.1-2: Tables maximum loading In load case 7.8g downward, trolleys weight are not taken into account, because trolleys forces are applied onto floor panels, the total weight for this load case without trolley is 37.6 kg. ILA-655D29826 14/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.11. MESH GENERATION The finite element model is detailed below: Nodes: 9538 Elements: 88546 Lumped Mass: Rigid element: 229 Thin shell linear quadrilateral: 9632 Thin shell linear triangle: 18 Linear rod: 3 Solid linear tetrahedron: Node to ground translational spring: 6 Constraint element: 3 The folding table is meshed in closed position and the sliding table is fully extended. The finite element model is detailed in the following figures. ILA-655D29826 15/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 FEM CAD model Internal and external metal sheets of reinforcement (3mm thickness) [PRT-359-651D19237-2 / PRT-358-651D19236-2] replaced by 2 external corners in aluminum 217T4 (3mm thickness) (see Figure 1.11-5) Composite panels are meshed with coincident nodes except for regions detailed below Figure 1.11-1: Galley A13/15-J11 meshing (1/4) ILA-655D29826 16/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 FEM CAD model Panels connected to others with metallic plates (no coincident mesh) Panels connected to others with metallic plates (no coincident mesh) Figure 1.11-2: Galley A13/15-J11 meshing (2/4) ILA-655D29826 17/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 FEM CAD model Panels connected to others with metallic corners (no coincident mesh) Cut in the decorative band FEM Figure 1.11-3: Galley A13/15-J11 meshing (3/4) ILA-655D29826 18/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 FEM CAD model Two panels connected with rigid elements Figure 1.11-4: Galley J11 meshing (4/4) Lines of 5 fasteners NAS 181-3 attached to panels 22 mm 24 mm 24 mm 26 mm Faces of the two corners in aluminum 217 T4 are parallel to the panels with which they are attached. Figure 1.11-5: Galley J11 meshing Dimensions and attachment of corners added ILA-655D29826 19/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.12. A/C INTERFACE POINTS AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS The Figure 1.12-1and Table 1.12-1 provide the location of the fitting points where the boundary conditions are applied and the constrained directions. 11 12 14 15 1 13 Figure 1.12-1: Lower attachments ILA-655D29826 2/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 2 6 4 Figure 1.12-2: Upper attachments Constraints (X: Fixed / -: Free) Location Type Ux Uy Uz Rx Ry Rz Point 2 (21655.5;635.;4215.5) Tie rod X X X X - - - Point 4 (21511.2;724.;4119.) Tie rod Y X X X - - - Point 6 (2983.;733.;4119.) Tie rod Y X X X - - - Point 1 (2115.7;325.;2338.7) Seat track X X X - - - Point 11 (21512.1;325;2338.7) Seat track X X X - - - Point 12 (21791.5;325.;2338.7) Seat track X X X - - - Point 13 (2115.7;96.;2338.7) Seat track X X X - - - Point 14 (21512.1;96.;2338.7) Seat track X X X - - - Point 15 (21791.5;96.;2338.7) Seat track X X X - - - Table 1.12-1: Coordinate locations of attachments in global system ILA-655D29826 21/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.13. MATERIALS AND FASTENERS MECHANICAL PROPERTIES 1.13.1. Metallic materials E (MPa) ν ρ (kg/mm 3 ) Ultimate tensile strength (MPa) Yield tensile strength (MPa) 224T3 & 724.33 2.78E-6 441 268.9 224T4 (1) 217A T4 (1) 72.33 2.8E-6 38 22.6 586 H111 (1) 72.33 2.8E-6 248 96 775T6 (1) 69.33 2.8E-6 515 442 Z1CNF18-9 (1) 19.3 7.9E-6 5 175 (1) values issue from document ref. A9 44.28 iss. 3, 8.1 Table 1.13-1: Metallic material properties For 224T3 & 224T4, the stress-strain curve is represented by the Ramberg-Osgood method: ε total =(σ/e) +.2 (σ/σ.2 ) n with: ε total : total strain σ: stress σ.2 ; yield stress E: modulus of elasticity n: Ramberg-Osgood parameter (n=11 for 224 series, and n=16 for 7175 series) n/a 1.13.2. Inserts mechanical properties ILA-655D29826 22/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.13.3. Fasteners mechanical properties Reference Diameter [mm] Ftu [N/mm²] Fsu [N/mm²] Tensile/Compression allowable load [N] Single shear allowable load [N] Rivet ASNA-78-A5-3 (1) 3.969 - - 1979 3736 NAS 112-4 (1) 6.35 88 528 29 1254 NAS 665 (1) 6.35 11 66 26125 291 NSA514P-132 (1) 4.826 88 528 11773 764 Screw NAS 134 (1) 6.35 - - 26126 15675 NAS 135 (1) 7.938 - - 41676 255 NAS181-3 (2) 4.82 - - 1259 755 651SP1 (1) 6.35 11 66 26125 291 Nut NSA 55-4 (3) 6.35 - - 2446 - NSA 55-5 (3) - - - 43 - Rod end NSA 8143-4 (1) 7.937 - - 2162 - NSA 8143-5 (1) 9.525 - - 3194 - (1) values extracted from A9.44.28 Calculations datas ATR Iss 3 (2) see standard: 16ksi=113 MPa (3) see standard NSA55 Table 1.13-2: Fasteners strength ILA-655D29826 23/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.13.4. Sandwich panels dimensions and composition These panels consist of a composite sandwich structure Skins Honeycomb ID THICKNESS CORE PLIES THICKNESS Honeycomb 2x2 Fabric 1 12.7 mm HRH1 3/16 2. 26/38%/7781.21 mm Honeycomb 2x3 Fabric 1B 12.7 mm HRH1 3/16 2. 26/38%/7781.21 mm Honeycomb 2x4 Fabric 2 12.7 mm HRH1 3/16 2. 26/38%/7781.21 mm Honeycomb 2x6 Fabric 3 12.7 mm HRH1 3/16 2. 26/38%/7781.21 mm 3B 12.7 mm 1x6 Fabric Honeycomb 1x4 Fabric HRH1 3/16 2. 26/38%/7781.21 mm Honeycomb 2x8 Fabric 4 12.7 mm HRH1 3/16 2. 26/38%/7781.21 mm 5 12.7 mm Honeycomb HRH1 3/16 2. 2x1 Fabric 26/38%/7781 Table 1.13-3: Sandwich panels composition.21 mm Nota : Some panels have a specific area designed with metallic plate between glasses plies. They are specified in drawings of panel s molding and detailed in figures below. All panels are sandwich panels defined within an optimized configuration, so: = 2x2 plies means: 2 plies + honeycomb + 2 plies = 2x4 plies means: 4 plies + honeycomb + 4 plies = 2x6 plies means: 6 plies + honeycomb + 6 plies = aluminum sheet (1mm) + 2 plies + honeycomb + 2 plies + aluminum sheet (1mm) ILA-655D29826 24/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 463 mm 487 mm Figure 3: Galley A13/15-J11 Laminate areas description (1/5) ILA-655D29826 25/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 161 mm 287 mm 198 mm Figure 4: Galley A13/15-J11 Laminate areas description (2/5) ILA-655D29826 26/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 2 mm 22 mm Figure 5: Galley A13/15-J11 Laminate areas description (3/5) ILA-655D29826 27/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 4mm 6mm 11mm 4mm 6mm 8mm 12mm 12mm Figure 6: Galley A13/15-J11 Laminate areas description (4/5) ILA-655D29826 28/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 6mm 1mm 43mm 61mm 112mm 185mm 165mm 125mm Figure 7: Galley A13/15-J11 Laminate areas description (5/5) ILA-655D29826 29/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 1.13.5. Sandwich panels mechanical properties Characteristics (1) HONEYCOMB HRH1 3/16 2. FABRIC 26/38%/7781 E1 (MPa) 1 27 E2 (MPa) 1 27 ν12.5.4 G12 (MPa) 1 42 G13 (MPa) 15 11 G23 (MPa) 15 11 ρ (kg/mm 3 ) 3.2E-8 2.333E-6 σ t1 (MPa) 1.1 265 σ c1 (MPa).8 2 σ t2 (MPa) 1.1 265 σ c2 (MPa).8 2 τ 12 (MPa).32 24 ply thickness (mm).21 (1) values issue from ref. A9 44.28 iss. 3, 8.7, except for G12, G13 and G23 values extracted from doc - CAQ/DT/NT/25 iss.a - SA-653B498142 iss. Table 1.13-4: Sandwich panels mechanical properties ILA-655D29826 3/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 2 The following Table 1.13-1 provides the action load of galley A and D onto aircraft structure. Loads components are defined in aircraft axis system. Table 1.13-1: Interface loads ILA-655D29826 31/32

173 ROCHEFORT FAX: (33) 5 46 87 4 12 3 CONCLUSION The Table 1.13-1 provides the maximum and minimum forces at aircraft interfaces into its coordinate: Table 1.13-1: Max and min interface loads (N) ILA-655D29826 32/32