Earth Deformation Homework 1

Similar documents
Fracture Zone Flexure

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

both an analytical approach and the pole method, determine: (a) the direction of the

CHAPTER 4 Stress Transformation

Mechanics in Energy Resources Engineering - Chapter 5 Stresses in Beams (Basic topics)

Continuum mechanism: Stress and strain

ME 243. Lecture 10: Combined stresses

Continuum mechanism: Plates

GG303 Lecture 17 10/25/09 1 MOHR CIRCLE FOR TRACTIONS

Symmetric Bending of Beams

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

Bone Tissue Mechanics

CHAPER THREE ANALYSIS OF PLANE STRESS AND STRAIN

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 2: Continuum mechanics

GLY Geomorphology Notes

[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams

CHAPTER THREE SYMMETRIC BENDING OF CIRCLE PLATES

SEMM Mechanics PhD Preliminary Exam Spring Consider a two-dimensional rigid motion, whose displacement field is given by

Combined Stresses and Mohr s Circle. General Case of Combined Stresses. General Case of Combined Stresses con t. Two-dimensional stress condition

Lecture 15 Strain and stress in beams

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Module III - Macro-mechanics of Lamina. Lecture 23. Macro-Mechanics of Lamina

Stress, Strain, Mohr s Circle

Name (Print) ME Mechanics of Materials Exam # 2 Date: March 29, 2016 Time: 8:00 10:00 PM - Location: PHYS 114

Review of Strain Energy Methods and Introduction to Stiffness Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis

VYSOKÁ ŠKOLA BÁŇSKÁ TECHNICKÁ UNIVERZITA OSTRAVA

3D Elasticity Theory

Free Body Diagram: Solution: The maximum load which can be safely supported by EACH of the support members is: ANS: A =0.217 in 2

Equilibrium of Deformable Body

CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Use various methods to determine the deflection and slope at specific pts on beams and shafts: 2. Discontinuity functions

ANALYSIS OF STRAINS CONCEPT OF STRAIN

MECE 3321: Mechanics of Solids Chapter 6

Mechanical Properties of Materials

By drawing Mohr s circle, the stress transformation in 2-D can be done graphically. + σ x σ y. cos 2θ + τ xy sin 2θ, (1) sin 2θ + τ xy cos 2θ.

Brittle Deformation. Earth Structure (2 nd Edition), 2004 W.W. Norton & Co, New York Slide show by Ben van der Pluijm

The Frictional Regime

Moment of a force (scalar, vector ) Cross product Principle of Moments Couples Force and Couple Systems Simple Distributed Loading

BEAM A horizontal or inclined structural member that is designed to resist forces acting to its axis is called a beam

1 Stress and Strain. Introduction

Force and Stress. Processes in Structural Geology & Tectonics. Ben van der Pluijm. WW Norton+Authors, unless noted otherwise 1/9/ :35 PM

M5 Simple Beam Theory (continued)

4. BEAMS: CURVED, COMPOSITE, UNSYMMETRICAL

BEAM DEFLECTION THE ELASTIC CURVE

Basic Equations of Elasticity

(Refer Slide Time: 2:43-03:02)

Name (Print) ME Mechanics of Materials Exam # 1 Date: October 5, 2016 Time: 8:00 10:00 PM

3.22 Mechanical Properties of Materials Spring 2008

ENG2000 Chapter 7 Beams. ENG2000: R.I. Hornsey Beam: 1

UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:

Classical Mechanics. Luis Anchordoqui

Principal Stresses, Yielding Criteria, wall structures

LECTURE 14 Strength of a Bar in Transverse Bending. 1 Introduction. As we have seen, only normal stresses occur at cross sections of a rod in pure

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Chapter 2 Basis for Indeterminate Structures

EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2 Stress & Strain - Axial Loading

Lecture 3: The Concept of Stress, Generalized Stresses and Equilibrium

Matrices and Deformation

16.20 Techniques of Structural Analysis and Design Spring Instructor: Raúl Radovitzky Aeronautics & Astronautics M.I.T

Sub. Code:

Unit 13 Review of Simple Beam Theory

3 2 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) 3. a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1

Bending of Simply Supported Isotropic and Composite Laminate Plates

3. BEAMS: STRAIN, STRESS, DEFLECTIONS

Stress transformation and Mohr s circle for stresses

Tectonics. Lecture 12 Earthquake Faulting GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD

Basic Energy Principles in Stiffness Analysis

Tentamen/Examination TMHL61

Lecture Notes 5

Strength of Materials Prof. S.K.Bhattacharya Dept. of Civil Engineering, I.I.T., Kharagpur Lecture No.26 Stresses in Beams-I

Problem " Â F y = 0. ) R A + 2R B + R C = 200 kn ) 2R A + 2R B = 200 kn [using symmetry R A = R C ] ) R A + R B = 100 kn

FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: CERTIFICATE IN ROCK MECHANICS PAPER 1 : THEORY SUBJECT CODE: COMRMC MODERATOR: H YILMAZ EXAMINATION DATE: OCTOBER 2017 TIME:

SIMPLY SUPPORTED STRUCTURAL BEAM STRESS AND DEFLECTION ANAL

Unit IV State of stress in Three Dimensions

Module 2 Stresses in machine elements. Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

Mechanics PhD Preliminary Spring 2017

Chapter 4 Deflection and Stiffness

Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING )

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Bending Stress. Sign convention. Centroid of an area

Symmetry and Properties of Crystals (MSE638) Stress and Strain Tensor

Failure from static loading

Normal stress causes normal strain σ 22

Elements of Rock Mechanics

Advanced Structural Analysis EGF Section Properties and Bending

Chapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis. Lecture Slides

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 5. Engineering Properties of Rocks (West, Ch. 6)

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension

THE TRENCH FLEXURE PROBLEM and

structural analysis Excessive beam deflection can be seen as a mode of failure.

Review Lecture. AE1108-II: Aerospace Mechanics of Materials. Dr. Calvin Rans Dr. Sofia Teixeira De Freitas

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Composites Design and Analysis. Stress Strain Relationship

Tuesday, February 11, Chapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE

Two Dimensional State of Stress and Strain: examples

LIMITATIONS OF THE STANDARD INTERACTION FORMULA FOR BIAXIAL BENDING AS APPLIED TO RECTANGULAR STEEL TUBULAR COLUMNS

Materials and Methods The deformation within the process zone of a propagating fault can be modeled using an elastic approximation.

Transcription:

Earth Deformation Homework 1 Michal Dichter October 7, 14 Problem 1 (T+S Problem -5) We assume the setup of Figure -4 from Turcotte and Schubert: We are given the following values: hcc = 5 km hsb = 7 km ρm = kg/m ρcc = 7 kg/m ρs = 45 kg/m We need to solve equation (-1): hsb = hcc ρm ρcc ρm ρs 1 1 α Plugging in the values above we get: α wb 1.4 w

Problem (Rotational symmetry of a crystal) Let us take some matrix A: A = a b c d e f g h i Matrix of a 9-degree counter-clockwise rotation about x: R x (9) = 1 1 1 Matrix of a 9-degree counter-clockwise rotation about y: 1 R y (9) = 1 1 Matrix of a 9-degree counter-clockwise rotation about z: 1 R z (9) = 1 1 The matrix A rotated 9 degrees about x: A rot.x = R x AR 1 x = The matrix A rotated 9 degrees about y: A rot.y = R y AR 1 y = g i h a c b d f e i h g f e d c b a The matrix A rotated 9 degrees about z: A rot.z = R z AR 1 z = e d f b a c h g i The problem states that we must have: A rot.x = A rot.y = A rot.z = A Thus we can conclude that all of the off-diagonal components must be zero and that a = e = i such that the matrix A must be of the form: a A = a a We therefore conclude that the matrix A has only one independent component!

Problem (T+S Problem -1) We can construct the following diagram: σ yy x O σ yx A x' σ y ' x ' σ xx σ xy y ' σ y ' y ' B y Force balance in the ˆx direction tells us that: σ yx OA σ xx OB σ y x cos(θ)ab + σ y y sin(θ)ab = We can divide both sides by AB and rearrange: σ y x cos θ σ y y sin θ = σ yx cos θ σ xx sin θ Now multiply both sides by sin θ: ( ) σ y x sin θ cos θ σ y y sin θ = σ yx sin θ cos θ σ xx sin θ Force balance in the ŷ direction tells us that: σ yy OA σ xy OB σ y x sin(θ)ab σ y y cos(θ)ab = We can divide both sides by AB and rearrange: σ y x sin θ + σ y y cos θ = σ yy cos θ σ xy sin θ Now multiply both sides by cos θ: ( ) σ y x sin θ cos θ + σ y y cos θ = σ yy cos θ σ xy sin θ cos θ Now use the symmetry of the stress tensor to say that σ xy = σ yx and subtract ( ) from ( ): σ y y (sin θ + cos θ) = σ xx sin θ + σ yy cos θ σ xy sin θ cos θ Now recall that sin θ + cos θ = 1 and sin θ cos θ = sin θ. So we see that: σ y y = σ xx sin θ + σ yy cos θ σ xy sin θ

Problem 4 (Stress tensor) We are given the following stress tensor: We can calculate the pressure p: σ = p σ xx + σ yy + σ zz 1 1 1 1 = 1 + 1 + So we know the isotropic part of σ: 4 σ iso = 4 4 And the deviatoric part of σ: The eigenvalues of σ are: σ dev = σ σ iso = And the corresponding eigenvectors are: σ I = σ II = σ III = I = 1 II = 1 1 1 III = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It is easy to see that these three eigenvectors are all mutually orthogonal (the dot product of any two equals zero) they form an orthonormal basis. = 4

Problem 5 (Mohr circle) We can construct the following schematic diagram: τ n point B τ n =C +μ σ n point A a b R B R A C σ A α M σ B σ 1 A α N We can calculate the slope µ from point A to point B as a function of the angle α: ( ) τn (R B R A ) sin α ( ) µ = = σ n (σ B σa ) + (R B R A )(1 + cos α) A B σ 1 B σ n We also know that the line perpendicular to τ n = C + µσ n drawn from M to A (or from N to B) has a slope of 1/µ: ( ) 1 ( ) µ = τn R A sin α = σ n (σ A + R A + R A cos α) (σ A + R = tan α A) M A Recall that we know the following values: σ A 1 σ A = 11 MPa = MPa σ B 1 σ B = 17 MPa = 4 MPa R A = σa 1 σ A R B = σb 1 σ B = 54 MPa = 8 MPa We can now solve ( ) and ( ) for µ and α: µ.65 α 1.9 radians 79.65 degrees

We can use some geometry to solve for C (see the labels on the diagram): We know a so we can further say: cos(α π/) = a h h = σa + R A + R A cos α cos(α π/) 155 MPa Now: So: b = h cos α 145 MPa C 45.64 MPa Now we suspect that a rd sample had a pre-existing crack. Then C = and we can calculate the two points where the failure criterion curve intersects the Mohr circle. For the 1 st test: 7.6 < α < 86.7. For the nd test: 74. < α < 85.. N.B. You can solve the whole problem by plotting Test 1 and Test on graph paper! Problem 6 (Strain accumulation at the San Andreas Fault) We are given the deformation gradient tensor: ( ).15.4 D =..15 We can decompose the deformation gradient tensor into a symmetric tensor and an antisymmetric tensor: ( ) ( ).15.1..1 D = +.1.15.1. We know that the San Andreas Fault trends N65 W so let us rotate the strain tensor counterclockwise into that coordinate system: ɛ = ( cos 65 sin 65 sin 65 cos 65 ) (.15.1.1.15 = (.4.19.19.4 ) ( cos 65 sin 65 sin 65 cos 65 ) 1 We see that the fault-shear strains (off-diagonal components) are rather large compared to the fault-normal strains (diagonal components). This is exactly what we expect for a strikeslip fault such as the San Andreas! The dilatation equals the trace (sum of the diagonal elements) of ɛ. Thus we can see =. )

Problem 7 (T+S Problem -19) Equation (-1) tells us the functional form w(x) of the plate deflection: ( w(x) = w e x/α cos x α + sin x ) α To get to the bending moment M we need to calculate the second derivative of w(x): d w dx = w e x/α (sin x α α cos x ) α The bending moment M is proportional to the second derivative of w(x): M = D d w dx We want to calculate the maximum value of M so we must take a derivative and set it equal to zero: dm dx = 4D α e x/α cos x α = The above is true for: x max = ± πα Now we can plug back in for M m and get equation (-18): M max.416 Dw α We can use the values given to estimate the maximum bending moment in the lithosphere: M max 1.6 1 17 N The maximum bending (fiber) stress σ max xx is then given by equation (-86): σ max xx = ± 6M h 8.1 18 N/m The + corresponds to the tensile stress at the top of the plate and the corresponds to the compressive stress at the bottom of the plate.

Problem 8 (T+S Problem -) We are told that the Amazon River Basin has a width w = 4 km. We are to model the basin as an elastic plate subject to a central line load (see Figures -9 and -). We can use equation (-15) to solve for the flexural parameter α: x b = πα 4 km = πα α 64 km We know that (ρ m ρ s ) = 7 kg/m so we can solve for the flexural rigidity D: [ 4D α = (ρ m ρ s )g ] 1/4 D.9 1 Nm Now we can solve for the thickness T e of the elastic lithosphere: D = ET e 1(1 ν ) Note the rather small value of T e here. T e 17 km Problem 9 (Dabbahu laccolith) Start from the flexure equation: D d4 w dx 4 dw = q(x) P dx Note that P = here. We can separate variables and integrate the equation four times to get: w(x) = qx4 4D + αx + βx + γx + δ The Greek letters are constants to be determined by four boundary conditions: w(±l/) = dw = dx x=± L The first two BCs tell us that α = γ =. The second two BCs tell us: β = ql 48D So we get: If we define: δ = ql4 84D w(x) = qx4 4D + ql x 48D + ql4 84D w ql4 84D

Then we can rewrite w(x) as: ( w(x) = w 1 8 L x + 16 ) L 4 x4 If we write w(x) as a bx + cx 4 then we can do a polynomial fit for the Dabbahu data. The parameter a tells us a value for w I got w 148 mm. We can use b and c to calculate L as follows: b c = L L 45 km Now we can use equation (-17) to calculate the flexural rigidity D: D = gl4 (ρ c ρ mag ) 56 D 6.5 1 19 Nm We can use our value of D to solve for the plate thickness h: D = Eh 1(1 ν ) h. km Finally we can solve for the magma pressure p: w = q D = ρ cgh p D p 57 MPa 5 Dabbahu laccolith B B' Annual uplift mm 15 1 5 1 1 Perpendicular distance from fault km

Two kilometers or so to the roof of the laccolith seems reasonable given that Dabbahu sits on a plate triple junction (Somalian-Nubian-Arabian). We expect dykes to nucleate at areas of great tensional stress. We know how the normal strain ɛ xx (x, y) relates to the normal stress σ xx (x, y): σ xx (x, y) = E 1 ν ɛ xx(x, y) And we know how ɛ xx (x, y) relates to the deflection w(x): ɛ xx (x, y) = y d w dx Now we can take the second derivative of the deflection w(x) at evaluate that at y = +h/ (the bottom of the plate): ɛ xx (x) = qhl 48D ( 1 1 ) L x So the normal stresses σ xx (x) at the bottom of the plate can be found recall that D = Eh /1(1 ν ): σ xx (x) = E ( 1 ν ɛ xx(x) = ql 4h 1 1 ) L x We want the value of x [ L/, L/] that produces the greatest negative (tensional) value of stress. We can see that σ xx (x) plots as a concave-downward parabola. Thus the greatest negative stresses must occur at the endpoints of the model domain at x = L/ and x = +L/. Problem 1 (Broken plate flexure) Blue: V = 1.5 1 1 N/m and M = 5. 1 17 N. Purple: V = N/m and M = 5. 1 17 N. Yellow: V = 1.5 1 1 N/m and M = N. 5 Flexure of plates for different end loads V and M 5 w x km 1 15 5 5 1 15 5 5 4 Distance from application of V and M km The flexural response depends upon the flexural rigidity D of the plate which scales as the cube(!) of the elastic plate thickness. In other words: A modest change to T e greatly changes the flexural response of the plate.

Problem 11 (Adding topography) Flexure of a plate w only topo V M red 5 5 w x km 1 15 5 5 5 1 15 5 5 4 Distance from LHS of rectangular topo km 5 Flexure of a plate w only topo V M red 5 1 w x km 15 5 5 4 45 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Distance from LHS of rectangular topo km We cannot use the shape of the Ganges Foredeep Basin (circled in green) to study slab-pull on the subducting Indian Plate. This is because the flexural response of the plate around the Foredeep Basin looks the same with or without loading at x =. Thus topography alone controls the shape of the Basin at least for the case at hand.