Lecture 15 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO

Similar documents
Adaptive Optics for the Giant Magellan Telescope. Marcos van Dam Flat Wavefronts, Christchurch, New Zealand

Ground-Layer Adaptive Optics Christoph Baranec (IfA, U. Hawai`i)

Tomography for Raven, a Multi-Object Adaptive Optics Science and Technology Demonstrator. Kate Jackson. Carlos Correia

Astronomie et astrophysique pour physiciens CUSO 2015

Telescopes & Adaptive Optics. Roberto Ragazzoni INAF Astronomical Observatory of Padova

An Introduction to. Adaptive Optics. Presented by. Julian C. Christou Gemini Observatory

PSFs for Laser Guide Star Tomographic Adaptive Optics Systems

Error Budgets, and Introduction to Class Projects. Lecture 6, ASTR 289

FP7-OPTICON PSF reconstruction meeting, Marseille January 14

Wavefront errors due to atmospheric turbulence Claire Max

Development of Field of View for Ground-based Optical Telescopes in Adaptive Optics Xiaochun Zhong 1, 2, a, Shujuan Wang 2, b, Zhiliang Huang 3, c

The Status of AO Worldwide. State of AO Today UC Santa Cruz. Interim Director, UC Observatories Director, Center for Adaptive Optics

Subaru GLAO Simulation. Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Hilo

Subaru GLAO Simulation. Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Hilo

The MAORY Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics module Emiliano Diolaiti Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica

MAORY (Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY) for E-ELT. Paolo Ciliegi. On behalf of the MAORY Consortium

Laboratory Experiments of Laser Tomographic Adaptive Optics at Visible Wavelengths on a 10-meter Telescope

A novel laser guide star: Projected Pupil Plane Pattern

Telescope Project Development Seminar

Analysis of the Sequence Of Phase Correction in Multiconjugate Adaptive Optics

AO system Design: Astronomy Olivier Guyon (University of Arizona / Subaru Telescope)

Giant Magellan Telescope

Adaptive Optics. Dave Andersen NRC Herzberg.

CURRENT STATUS OF RAVEN, A MOAO SCIENCE DEMONSTRATOR FOR SUBARU

1. INTRODUCTION ABSTRACT

Introduction to Adaptive Optics. Tim Morris

Adaptive optics and atmospheric tomography: An inverse problem in telescope imaging

EAGLE multi-object AO concept study for the E-ELT

Exoplanet High Contrast Imaging Technologies Ground

Presented by B. Neichel. Wide-Field Adaptive Optics for ground based telescopes: First science results and new challenges

Wide field astronomical image compensation with multiple laser-guided adaptive optics

On-sky MOAO performance evaluation of RAVEN

Wide-Field Image Compensation with Multiple Laser Guide Stars

Atmospheric Turbulence and its Influence on Adaptive Optics. Mike Campbell 23rd March 2009

Adaptive Optics Status & Roadmap. Norbert Hubin Adaptive Optics Department European Southern Observatory November 2007

Raven, a Multi-Object Adaptive Optics technology and science demonstrator

Performance Modeling for the RAVEN Multi-Object Adaptive Optics Demonstrator

Astronomical Observing Techniques Lecture 13: Adap<ve Op<cs

Point spread function reconstruction at W.M. Keck Observatory : progress and beyond

Suresh Sivanandam (PI) University of Toronto

Experimental results of tomographic reconstruction on ONERA laboratory MCAO bench

Visible near-diffraction-limited lucky imaging with full-sky laser-assisted adaptive optics

NB: from now on we concentrate on seeing, as scintillation for large telescopes is unimportant

Wavefront reconstruction for adaptive optics. Marcos van Dam and Richard Clare W.M. Keck Observatory

MULTIPLE OBJECT ADAPTIVE OPTICS: MIXED NGS/LGS TOMOGRAPHY

Adaptive Optics Overview Phil Hinz What (Good) is Adaptive Optics?

Performance Modeling of a Wide Field Ground Layer Adaptive Optics System

TURBULENCE IN HIGH ANGULAR RESOLUTION TECHNIQUES IN ASTRONOMY

Sky Projected Shack-Hartmann Laser Guide Star

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.im] 15 Mar 2016

PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF THE MULTI-CONJUGATE AO SYSTEM OF THE EUROPEAN SOLAR TELESCOPE

Early closed-loop results from the MMT's multi-laser guide star adaptive optics system

Astronomical Observing Techniques 2017 Lecture 13: Twinkle, twinkle star... No more!

Achieving high resolution

CIRMOS. 4/26/2010 Tetsuo Nishimura

Modelling the multi-conjugate adaptive optics system of the European Extremely Large Telescope

Subaru Telescope Ground Layer AO System and New Near-IR Instrument

Adaptive Optics Lectures

ADVANCEMENT OF AO TECHNOLOGY FOR THE NEXT GENERATION OF EXTREMELY LARGE TELESCOPES

Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics

Fourier domain preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for atmospheric tomography

A FREQUENCY DEPENDENT PRECONDITIONED WAVELET METHOD FOR ATMOSPHERIC TOMOGRAPHY

Wavefront Reconstruction

Overall science goals and top level AO requirements for the E-ELT

Sky demonstration of potential for ground layer adaptive optics correction

W.M. Keck Observatory s Next Generation Adaptive Optics Facility

Comparing the performance of open loop centroiding techniques in the Raven MOAO system

Field Tests of elongated Sodium LGS wave-front sensing for the E-ELT

A NEW METHOD FOR ADAPTIVE OPTICS POINT SPREAD FUNCTION RECONSTRUCTION

Subaru Next Generation Wide Field AO: Ground Layer AO Simulation

Speckles and adaptive optics

What do companies win being a supplier to ESO

Medium baseline, high sensitivity, high efficiency imaging interferometer for general astrophysics

Very compact galaxies at high-z

Extragalactic Sub-Committee, Keck NGAO

Performance of Adaptive Optics Systems

Keck laser guide star: Science case

New challenges for adaptive optics: the OWL 1OOm telescope

Next generation AO system of Subaru Telescope

Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor sensitivity loss factor estimation in partial correction regime

TMT Instrumentation and Performance:

End-to-end model for the Polychromatic Laser Guide Star project (ELP-OA)

UCO/Lick Laboratory for Adaptive Optics

Adaptive Optics. Without adaptive optics (Palomar 200 inch telescope)

MAORY design trade-off study: tomography dimensioning

Extreme Adaptive Optics in the mid-ir: The METIS AO system

High-Contrast Exoplanet Gemini. Christian Marois NRC-NSI, DAO GPI DA&A

Seeing Improvement with Ground-Layer Adaptive Optics

GEMS: FROM THE ON-SKY EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM TO SCIENCE OPERATION: THE AO POINT OF VIEW.

Preparing staff for ELT science operations activities

Using Site Testing Data for Adaptive Optics Simulations

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.im] 20 Oct 2016

Phase-Referencing and the Atmosphere

Adaptive optics sky coverage modeling for extremely large telescopes

THE SUBARU CORONAGRAPHIC EXTREME AO HIGH SENSITIVITY VISIBLE WAVEFRONT SENSORS

The AO and MCAO for the 4m European Solar Telescope

Tomography and calibration for Raven: from simulations to laboratory results

I FINAL REPORT[ 15 MAY JUL 2006

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 23 Jun 2014

Adaptive Optics Systems for the Thirty Mirror Telescope

Transcription:

Lecture 15 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 March 3, 2016 Page 1

Outline of lecture What is AO tomography? Applications of AO tomography Laser tomography AO Multi-conjugate AO (MCAO) Multi-object AO (MOAO) Ground-layer AO (GLAO) Much of this lecture is based on presentations by Don Gavel, Lisa Poyneer, Francois Rigaut, and Olivier Guyon. Thanks! Page 2

Limitations for AO systems with one guide star Isoplanatic Angle Limits the corrected field r 0 h θ 0 3

Limitations for AO systems with one guide star Cone effect 4

Limitations for AO systems with one guide star Cone effect 1. Missing turbulence outside and above cone 2. Spherical wave stretching of wavefront More severe for larger telescope diameters h r 0 5

Fundamental problem to solve: Isoplanatic Angle If we assume perfect on-axis correction, and a single turbulent layer at altitude h, the variance (sq. radian) is : σ 2 = 1.03 (θ/θ 0) 5/3 Θ = angle to optical axis, θ0 = isoplanatic angle: θ0 = 0.31 (r0/<h>) D = 8 m, r0 = 0.8 m, <h> = 5 km => θ0 = 10 h

Francois Rigaut s diagrams of tomography for AO 90 km Missing Data Credit: Rigaut, MCAO for Dummies Page 7

What is Tomography? 2. Wider field of view, no cone effect 90 km Tomography lets you reconstruct turbulence in the entire cylinder of air above the telescope mirror Credit: Rigaut, MCAO for Dummies Page 8

Concept of a metapupil Can be made larger than real telescope pupil Increased field of view due to overlap of fields toward multiple guide stars Page 9

How tomography works: from Don Gavel k Z k X x - z plane Fourier Transform k x - k z plane Fourier slice theorem in tomography (Kak, Computer Aided Tomography, 1988) Each wavefront sensor measures the integral of index variation along the ray lines The line integral along z determines the k z =0 Fourier spatial frequency component Projections at several angles sample the k x,k y,k z volume 10

How tomography works: from Don Gavel k Z k X x - z plane Fourier Transform k x - k z plane The larger the telescope s primary mirror, the wider the range of angles accessible for measurement In Fourier space, this means that the bow-tie becomes wider More information about the full volume of turbulence above the telescope 11

How tomography works: some math y = Ax where y = vector of all WFS measurements x = value of δ(opd) at each voxel in turbulent volume above telescope A is a forward propagator x y Assume we measure y with our wavefront sensors Want to solve for x = value of δ(opd) The equations are underdetermined there are more unknown voxel values than measured phases blind modes. Need a few natural guide stars to determine these. Page 12

Solve for the full turbulence above the telescope using the back-propagator x = A T y y = vector of all WFS measurements x = value of δ(opd) at each voxel in turbulent volume above telescope x y A T is a back propagator along rays back toward the guidestars Use iterative algorithms to converge on the solution. x y Page 13

LGS Related Problems: Null modes Tilt Anisoplanatism : Low order modes (e.g. focus) more important than Tip-Tilt at altitude Dynamic Plate Scale changes Five Null Modes are not seen by LGS (Tilt indetermination problem) Need 3 well spread tip-tilt stars to control these modes Credit: Rigaut, MCAO for Dummies Page 14

Outline of lecture Review of AO tomography concepts AO applications of tomography Laser tomography AO Multi-conjugate AO (MCAO) Multi-object AO (MOAO) Ground-layer AO (GLAO) Page 15

Laser Tomography AO: Fixes Cone Effect Corrected field: 10 s of arc sec one DM Narrow field, cone effect fixed Page 16

Multi-Conjugate AO: Wider Field Correction Corrected field: up to ~2 arc min 2 DMs Corrects over wider field, at a penalty in peak Strehl Page 17

Multi-Object AO: Wider Field but only correct objects you are interested in Corrected field: N x 10 s of arc sec One DM for each object of interest Multiple Narrow Field DMs Correct over narrow field of view located anywhere w/in wide field of regard Page 18

Ground Layer AO: Widest field, only modest AO correction Corrected field: 5-10 arc min One DM conjugate to ground Quite modest correction over a much wider field of view Page 19

Corrected fields of view vary depending on method Method Corrected field of view Laser Tomography AO LTAO 10 s of arc sec Multi-Object AO MOAO N x 10 s of arc sec Multi-Conjugate AO MCAO about 2 arc min Ground Layer AO GLAO A few to 10 arc min Page 20

Outline of lecture Review of AO tomography concepts AO applications of tomography Multi-conjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) Multi-object adaptive optics (MOAO) Ground-layer AO (GLAO) Page 21

What is multiconjugate AO? Turbulence Layers Deformable mirror Credit: Rigaut, MCAO for Dummies Page 22

What is multiconjugate AO? Deformable mirrors Turbulence Layers Credit: Rigaut, MCAO for Dummies Page 23

Difference between Laser Tomography AO and MCAO Laser Tomography AO can be done with only 1 deformable mirror If used with multiple laser guide stars, reduces cone effect MCAO uses multiple DMs, increases field of view Page 24

Star Oriented MCAO Each WFS looks at one star Global Reconstruction n GS, n WFS, m DMs 1 Real Time Controller The correction applied at each DM is computed using all the input data. DM2 DM1 Guide Stars High Altitude Layer Ground Layer Telescope WFC WFSs Credit: N. Devaney Page 25

MCAO Simulations, 3 guide stars Strehl at 2.2 µm 3 guide stars, FoV = 1 arc min 3 guide stars, FoV = 1.5 arc min Credit: N. Devaney Optimum guide star separation: about one isoplanatic angle Page 26

First operational MCAO system: GEMS at Gemini South 8m telescope

GEMS image of star formation in Orion Page 28

Orion star forming region: Compare GEMS MCAO with ALTAIR single conjugate AO on Gemini North Telescope ALTAIR GEMS

GEMS MCAO: very good uniformity across 87 x 87 field Credit: Rigaut et al. 2013 Page 30

Outline of lecture Review of AO tomography concepts AO applications of tomography Multi-conjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) Multi-object adaptive optics (MOAO) Ground-layer AO (GLAO) Page 31

Distinctions between multi-conjugate and multi-object AO Closed-Loop Open-Loop? 1-2 arc min DMs conjugate to different altitudes in the atmosphere Guide star light is corrected by DMs before its wavefront is measured Only one DM per object, conjugate to ground Guide star light doesn t bounce off small MEMS DMs in multi-object spectrograph Page 32

Multi-Object AO Correct over multiple narrow fields of view located anywhere w/in wide field of regard In most versions, each spectrograph or imager has its own MEMS AO mirror, which laser guide star lights doesn t bounce off of Hence this scheme is called open loop : DM doesn t correct laser guide star wavefronts before LGS light goes to wavefront sensors In one version, each LGS also has its own MEMS correction Page 33

Science with MOAO: multiple deployable spatially resolved spectrographs A MEMS DM underneath each high-redshift galaxy, feeding a narrow-field spatially resolved spectrograph (IFU) No need to do AO correction on the blank spaces between the galaxies Page 34

Why does MOAO work if there is only one deformable mirror in the science path? Tomography lets you measure the turbulence throughout the volume above the telescope 90 km Page 35

Why does MOAO work if there is only one deformable mirror in the science path? Tomography lets you measure the turbulence throughout the volume above the telescope 90 km In the direction to each galaxy, you can then project out the turbulence you need to cancel out for that galaxy Page 36

Existing MOAO Demonstration Systems CANARY (Durham, Obs. de Paris, ONERA, ESO) MOAO demonstrator for E-ELT On William Herschel Telescope First NGS, then Rayleigh guide stars RAVEN (U Victoria, Subaru, INO, Canadian NRC) MOAO demonstrator for Subaru telescope 3 NGS wavefront sensors Field of regard > 2.7 arc min Page 37

Both E-ELT and TMT have done early designs for MOAO systems Artist s sketch of EAGLE MOAO system for E-ELT One of the constraints is that the spectrographs are very large! Hard (and expensive) to fit in a lot of them Page 39

Outline of lecture Review of AO tomography concepts AO applications of tomography Multi-conjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) Multi-object adaptive optics (MOAO) Ground-layer AO (GLAO) Page 40

Ground layer AO: do tomography, but only use 1 DM (conjugate to ground layer) GLAO uses 1 ground-conjugated DM, corrects near-ground turbulence Credit: J-M Conan Page 41

Correcting just the ground layer gives a very large isoplanatic angle Strehl = 0.38 at θ = θ 0 θ 0 is isoplanatic angle ϑ 0 = 2.914 k 2 (secζ ) 8 / 3 dz C 2 N (z) z 5 / 3 θ 0 is weighted by high-altitude turbulence (z 5/3 ) 0 3 / 5 If turbulence is only at low altitude, overlap is very high. If you only correct the low altitude turbulence, the isoplanatic angle will be large (but the correction will be only modest) Telescope Common Path Page 42

time Credit: A. Tokovinin Page 43

Many observatories have ambitious GLAO projects planned Near term on medium sized telescopes: SOAR (4.25m), William Herschel Telescope (4.2m), MMT (6.5m) Medium term on VLT (8m), LBT (2x8m) Longer term on Giant Magellan Telescope etc. Is it worth the large investment just to decrease seeing disk by factor of 1.5 to 2? Large spectrographs can take advantage of smaller image (smaller slit) Potential improved SNR for background-limited point sources Page 44

GLAO on the MMT Telescope Michael Hart et al., 5 Rayleigh laser guide stars FWHM decreased from 0.85 arc sec to 0.28 arc sec (!) Page 45

GLAO on the MMT Telescope Michael Hart et al., 5 Rayleigh laser guide stars Page 46

!"#$%&'()*+(,-'(..,($/&012&#3'4( 546/78(9#:'4(;<(=59;<>(3:30'$ "#$%&'(#)*+,'#&-%(&#.#"#/%0'1(23-#4'%&*('4'3-& 5'623&-(*6-2(#7''8&#23$9#)(2*3,#$%9'(:#624423#-2#-;'#"#/%0'1(23-& <+3)$'#=>#62(('6-&#12(#-;'#)(2*3,#$%9'(?#62(('6-+23#+&#0%$+,#20'(#%#$%()'#@'$, /+(A*%&&+0*1 ' *23%4(50*6789*":B"# -&<=534>?3@*'@=%( 99C*5('D%4'E*9;*<%&FD%=5*@%D'4(5 $%&'()*%&&+*,-./0*1 ' *23%4(50*6789*":;"# -&<=534>?3@*'@=%(!!"#!!"#!

Summary Tomography: a way to measure the full volume of turbulence above the telescope Once you have measured the turbulence there are several ways to do the wavefront correction Laser Tomography AO: Multiple laser guide stars, 1 DM, corrects cone effect. Narrow field. Multi-conjugate AO: Multiple DMs, each optically conjugate to a different layer in atmosphere. Wider field of view. Multi-object AO: Correct many individual objects, each over a small field. Each has very good correction. Wider field of regard. Ground-layer AO: Correct just ground layer turbulence. Very large field of view but only modest correction. All four methods will be used in the future Page 48

Corrected fields of view vary depending on method Method Corrected field of view Laser Tomography AO LTAO 10 s of arc sec Multi-Object AO MOAO N x 10 s of arc sec Multi-Conjugate AO MCAO about 2 arc min Ground Layer AO GLAO A few to 10 arc min Page 49