M 7.1 EARTHQUAKE 5KM ENE OF RABOSO, MEXICO EXACT LOCATION: N W DEPTH: 51.0KM SEPTEMBER 19, 1:14 LOCAL TIME

Similar documents
M-8.1 EARTHQUAKE 87KM SW OF PIJIJIAPAN, MEXICO EXACT LOCATION: N W DEPTH: 69.7KM SEPTEMBER 7, 11:49 PST

M-6.2 EARTHQUAKE NORCIA, ITALY AUGUST 24, 01:36:33 UTC

Important Concepts. Earthquake hazards can be categorized as:

Seismic Hazard Abatement Program

Seismic vulnerability in Latinamerica Speaker: Rafael Osiris de León Sciences Academy of Dominican Republic.

Earthquake Risk in Canada and the National Building Code

Downtown Anchorage Seismic Risk Assessment & Land Use Regulations to Mitigate Seismic Risk

Magnitude 6.3 SOUTH ISLAND OF NEW ZEALAND

Earthquake early warning: Adding societal value to regional networks and station clusters

Hazard and Vulnerability of Moderate Seismicity Regions

Module 2, Investigation 1: Earthquake Hazards

NPTEL Online - IIT Kanpur. Course Name Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Department IIT Kanpur

HAZUS-MH: Earthquake Event Report

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

Natural Disasters Spring, LECTURE #8: Earthquake Disasters: Monitoring & Mitigation. Date: 1 Feb 2018 (lecturer: Dr.

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment And Financing Initiative

Ground motion intensity map of the Tainan earthquake (Central Weather Bureau).

Magnitude 6.9 GULF OF CALIFORNIA

Earthquakes.

SHAKING AND GROUND FAILURE-INDUCED DAMAGE TO BUILDINGS BY THE 2010 AND 2011 CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKES AND ITS LESSONS

Magnitude 7.1 PHILIPPINES

Earthquake Hazards in Douglas County

September 28, 2004 Parkfield Earthquake

Introduction. Thematic Mapping for Disaster Risk Assessment in Case of Earthquake FIG Working Week

Earthquakes and Earth s Interior

9. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS

Magnitude 7.3 OFFSHORE EL SALVADOR

Earthquake Hazards in Henderson

The Magnitude 7.2 Earthquake from the West Valley Fault: Implications for Metro Manila and Nearby Provinces

LAB 9: Earthquakes & Seismic Activity

An Unexpected Catastrophe: Anniversary of the 1989 Newcastle. The 1989 Earthquake. By Dr. Khosrow Shabestari and Dr. Peeranan Towashiraporn

Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment And Financing Initiative

Earthquake Hazards in Washoe County

Prevention Tsunami wall 10m high (breached by the tsunami due to land level falling by 3m)

FOURTH GRADE HAZARDS 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Preview Mode: ON Earthquake Risk in Stable, Intraplate Regions: the Case. of Perth, Australia. Historical Seismicity in the Perth Region

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment And Financing Initiative

Borah Peak Earthquake HAZUS Scenario Project Executive Summary Idaho Bureau of Homeland Security Idaho Geological Survey Western States Seismic

Earthquakes. These icons indicate that teacher s notes or useful web addresses are available in the Notes Page.

Initiative. Country Risk Profile: papua new guinea. Better Risk Information for Smarter Investments PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Source:

Seismic Hazard Switzerland. When, where, and how often does certain shaking occur in Switzerland?

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment And Financing Initiative

How to communicate Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake hazards

Magnitude 7.0 N of ANCHORAGE, ALASKA

To present information on the history, consequences, and existing threat of moderate to major eaythquakes in Arkansas.

NPTEL Video Course on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

The Inevitability and Consequences of Mega-Disasters in a Crowded World

New USGS Maps Identify Potential Ground- Shaking Hazards in 2017

Flexible soils amplified the damage in the 2010 Haiti earthquake

Magnitude 7.6 SOUTH OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Earthquakes down under: a rare but real hazard

SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN ARMENIA

7.8M Earthquake in Nepal Situation Report No. 1

2014/TPTWG/WKSP/013 Responding to Global Earthquake Hazards

M8.8 MAULE EARTHQUAKE February 27, 2010

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC)

Magnitude 7.3 NEPAL. Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 07:05:19 UTC

Collision and transform Boundaries

Magnitude 7.2 OAXACA, MEXICO

Earthquake Disaster Management in India

Characteristics and introduction of Earthquake in Asia-Pacific region

Homework Assignment II. Seismological Exercises Fall 2014

Damage Estimation of the Road Bridge Structure Using the Seismic Hazard map for BCM in Hokkaido, Japan

1 of 27. Boardworks Ltd Earthquakes

Preliminary Investigation of Damage to Near Fault Buildings of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake

Increasingly technological

WESTERN STATES SEISMIC POLICY COUNCIL POLICY RECOMMENDATION Earthquake and Tsunami Planning Scenarios

Tsunami waves swept away houses and cars in northern Japan and pushed ships aground.

SURFACE WAVES AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES

VULNERABILITY FUNCTIONS FOR BUILDINGS BASED ON DAMAGE SURVEY DATA IN SRI LANKA AFTER THE 2004 INDIAN OCEAN TSUNAMI. Murao, O. 1, Nakazato, H.

Before exploring the effects of the 1906 earthquake, watch the video on ground shaking and liquefaction at:

Word Cards. 2 map. 1 geographic representation. a description or portrayal of the Earth or parts of the Earth. a visual representation of an area

Trends of Natural Disasters in the Asia- Pacific Region and the Direction of Disaster Management

A magnitude 7.4 earthquake struck 255 km (158 miles) southwest of Tonga, according to the US Geological Survey, but there were no reports of damage.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Special feature: Are its lessons being adequately applied? Follow-up on the ten-year anniversary of the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake

Magnitude 7.1 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

"The Big One" by sea and not by land

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Tsukuba, Japan International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Building Research Institute STUDY TRIP TO ITAKO CITY

Preliminary Earthquake Risk Management Strategy Plan of Eskisehir, Turkey by using GIS

The AIR Tropical Cyclone Model for Mexico

Earthquake. earthquake, epicenters in the U.S. Kobe, Japan deaths

Cyber Enabled Earth Exploration (CE )

Tectonic Processes and Hazards Enquiry Question 1: Why are some locations more at risk from tectonic hazards?

Forces in Earth s Crust

In the early morning hours of

Lesson 8. Natural Disasters

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES. Duration of resource: 30 Minutes. Year of Production: Stock code: VEA Resource written by: Andrew Clarke BA Dip Tchg

Geologic Hazards. Geologic Setting

Magnitude 6.3, NORTH OF MOROCCO

Disaster Risk Assessment: Opportunities for GIS and data management with Open DRI

ASSESSING OREGON S SEISMIC RISK

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 5-1. Risk Assessment and Hazard Mapping. CLUSTER 5: Hazard and Risk Information and Decision Making. Public Disclosure Authorized

Flexible soils amplified the damage in the 2010 Haiti earthquake

PROTECTING MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL SETTINGS FROM THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE

ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning

Transcription:

M 7.1 EARTHQUAKE 5KM ENE OF RABOSO, MEXICO EXACT LOCATION: 18.584 N 98.399 W DEPTH: 51.0KM SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 @ 1:14 LOCAL TIME Photo: Eduardo Verdugo / AP

Photo: Alfredo Estrella/ Agence France-Presse/ Getty Images

THE 2017 RABOSO (CENTRAL MEXICO), MEXICO EARTHQUAKE This earthquake was a magnitude 7.1 event at a depth of 50 km that occurred at 1:14 pm local time on 19 September 2017, 5km from Raboso, Mexico and approximately 120 km from Mexico City. At time of this writing, more than 270 deaths (including 137 in Mexico City, 43 in the State of Puebla and 73 in Morelos) and over 1,900 injuries have been confirmed, however, there are still many people unaccounted and search-and-rescue operations continue. The USGS model estimates an economic loss of $US100M to $1000M for this type of event. At least 25 people including 19 schoolchildren lost their lives when the three-story Enrique Rebsámen school building in Mexico City collapsed. A large number of buildings have collapsed or sustained significant damage; this included a number of hospitals that had to be evacuated. Over half of the fatalities occurred in the Greater Mexico City, population 21.3 million, where at least 44 buildings collapsed. The M 7.1 earthquake occurred close to the subduction of the Cocos plate beneath Central America at the Middle America Trench about 300 km away. The location, depth and normal-faulting mechanism of this earthquake indicate that it is likely an intraplate event within the Cocos slab. In the past 100 years, 19 other M 6.5+ earthquakes have occurred within 250 km of the hypocenter of this earthquake, including the 1957 M 7.6 earthquake that resulted in over 100 fatalities. Mexico is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in the world and has experienced a number of large earthquakes; see Figure 1. The 1985 M 8.0 earthquake generated more than 5,000 fatalities and hundreds of collapsed buildings. Figure 1. Earthquakes in Mexico, last 100 years

The main shock of this earthquake is classified as having an intensity (MMI) of VII, which is considered very strong shaking; see Figure 2. Figure 2. Intensity map A number of cities with large populations were exposed to shaking intensity of MMI VI-VII; see Table 1. City Population MMI Ayutla 7,000 VII Izucar de Matamoros 43,000 VII Jiutepec 162,000 VII Puebla 1,590,000 VII Mexico City 12,290,000 VII Table 1. Population exposure comparison for the 2010 and 2011 events

This event had a preliminary peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.4-0.5g near the epicenter; see Figure 3. In Mexico, a large array of strong motion stations are employed to record earthquake data. At station 27 (59 km away), PGA was 0.19g; At station 21 (87 km away), PGA was 0.28g. Figure 3. Preliminary PGA data Figure 4. Shaking intensity for the earthquake At Mexico City, PGA was closer to 0.2g and the shaking was strong but not severe; see Figure 4. The large number of fatalities and damage here was greater than anticipated and can be attributed to several factors: A large portion of Mexico City is situated on an ancient sea bed and the underlying soil is very soft. This causes the amplification of ground motion to the built infrastructure. So although there are no faults in the city, events from far-away earthquakes are amplified and can generate large forces. This phenomenon was observed during the 1985 earthquake and was again evident with this earthquake. After the 1985 earthquake, the building codes were modified and include good ductile detailing. However, compliance with the code is not always enforced, especially in outlying areas, and, in many cases, residents make alterations and additions to the buildings that can after alter these structures earthquake resistance. Damage assessment data from this earthquake is yet not available. However, preliminary data indicates that a large number of buildings with significant damage used either unreinforced masonry (URM) bearing walls or reinforced concrete construction of older vintage. These building types (especially with a soft/weak story or torsion) are most susceptible to earthquake damage and collapse. This event had a long duration for strong motion, resulting in buildings being subjected to a large number of shaking cycles.

REPORTED DAMAGE In Mexico City, more than 40 buildings have either collapsed or suffered significant damage; see Figure 5. This included the three-story Enrique Rebsámen school (Figure 6), two multi-story apartments, multi-residential buildings, a supermarket and a factory. There was also significant damage in Puebla (city), population 1.5 million.

Figure 5. Arial view of collapsed buildings Figure 6. Collapsed Enrique Rebsámen school building in Mexico City Figure 7 and Figure 8 show examples of observed building damage. As shown in Figure 9 through Figure 11, damage was not limited to building framing, older buildings, or buildings alone.

Cracking of CMU wall building Out-of plane failure of URM bearing wall building Commercial store Multi-story building Figure 7. Examples of building damage

Figure 8. Damaged Jojulta Municipal Palace Figure 9. Nonstructural damage Figure 11. Collapsed bridge span Figure 10. Exterior damage to a modern mid-rise building Shortly after the earthquake, an engineering team from Miyamoto International was in contact with local authorities and people on the ground to assess the situation and provide assistance. The findings of the team will be provided in the future communiques. Members of the Miyamoto team are heading to Mexico as of this writing to assist clients and government entities, as requested.

Photo: Eduardo Verdugo / Associated Press

save lives, impact economies Sacramento San Francisco San Jose Miyamoto International is a global earthquake + structural engineering and project management company providing critical services that sustain industries and safeguard communities around the world. We are experts in high-performance engineering that reduces lifecycle costs and produces a positive net impact on a structure s operation. We assess the performance of structures to identify specific vulnerabilities, and prioritize solutions that limit business interruption and reduce property damage. Built on decades of earthquake and structural engineering experience in the field, our expertise supports how clients address the economic, political, social, sustainability and resiliency challenges in earthquake risk reduction and post-disaster recovery and reconstruction. Miyamoto offices are strategically located worldwide in earthquake-hazard regions to positively impact economies and save lives. Los Angeles Orange County San Diego Reno Washington, D.C. Costa Rica Colombia Haiti Liberia Italy Turkey India Nepal Japan New Zealand make the world a better, safer place.

Disclaimer: Reference for material and photos from various online sources including CNN, LA Times, BBC, USGS miyamotointernational.com 2017 Miyamoto International, Inc. Sacramento San Francisco San Jose Los Angeles Orange County San Diego Reno Washington, D.C. Costa Rica Colombia Haiti Liberia Italy Turkey India Nepal Japan New Zealand