2C9 Design for seismic and climate changes. Jiří Máca

Similar documents
Lecture 27: Structural Dynamics - Beams.

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

Structural Dynamics Lecture Eleven: Dynamic Response of MDOF Systems: (Chapter 11) By: H. Ahmadian

Structural Dynamics A Graduate Course in Aerospace Engineering

Lecture 7: The Beam Element Equations.

JEPPIAAR ENGINEERING COLLEGE

Structural Dynamics Lecture 4. Outline of Lecture 4. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems. Formulation of Equations of Motions. Undamped Eigenvibrations.

Chapter 4 Analysis of a cantilever

ANALYSIS OF HIGHRISE BUILDING STRUCTURE WITH SETBACK SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS

Introduction to Continuous Systems. Continuous Systems. Strings, Torsional Rods and Beams.

Part D: Frames and Plates

CIVL 8/7117 Chapter 12 - Structural Dynamics 1/75. To discuss the dynamics of a single-degree-of freedom springmass

Matrix Iteration. Giacomo Boffi.

Chapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements

Effect of Mass Matrix Formulation Schemes on Dynamics of Structures

Lecture 15: Revisiting bars and beams.

Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1. Method of Finite Elements I. Chapter 2. The Direct Stiffness Method. Method of Finite Elements I

Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum

Reduction in number of dofs

FREE VIBRATIONS OF FRAMED STRUCTURES WITH INCLINED MEMBERS

Advanced Vibrations. Elements of Analytical Dynamics. By: H. Ahmadian Lecture One

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Index

Advanced Vibrations. Distributed-Parameter Systems: Exact Solutions (Lecture 10) By: H. Ahmadian

VIBRATION PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING

Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1. Method of Finite Elements I. Chapter 2. The Direct Stiffness Method. Method of Finite Elements I

Structural Matrices in MDOF Systems

Introduction to structural dynamics

Stochastic Dynamics of SDOF Systems (cont.).

ME FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FORMULAS

Outline. Structural Matrices. Giacomo Boffi. Introductory Remarks. Structural Matrices. Evaluation of Structural Matrices

Mechanical Vibrations Chapter 6 Solution Methods for the Eigenvalue Problem

Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance

Advanced Vibrations. Distributed-Parameter Systems: Approximate Methods Lecture 20. By: H. Ahmadian

ME 475 Modal Analysis of a Tapered Beam

Giacomo Boffi. April 7, 2016

Review of Strain Energy Methods and Introduction to Stiffness Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis

Chapter 23: Principles of Passive Vibration Control: Design of absorber

FREE VIBRATION RESPONSE OF UNDAMPED SYSTEMS

Identification Methods for Structural Systems. Prof. Dr. Eleni Chatzi Lecture March, 2016

EQUIVALENT SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEM AND FREE VIBRATION

Multi Degrees of Freedom Systems

Program System for Machine Dynamics. Abstract. Version 5.0 November 2017

EML4507 Finite Element Analysis and Design EXAM 1

Part 1: Discrete systems

on the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2

Static & Dynamic. Analysis of Structures. Edward L.Wilson. University of California, Berkeley. Fourth Edition. Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering

CIVL4332 L1 Introduction to Finite Element Method

18. FAST NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. The Dynamic Analysis of a Structure with a Small Number of Nonlinear Elements is Almost as Fast as a Linear Analysis

FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES

Generalized Single Degree of Freedom Systems

General elastic beam with an elastic foundation

Response Analysis for Multi Support Earthquake Excitation

M.S Comprehensive Examination Analysis

Chapter 2: Rigid Bar Supported by Two Buckled Struts under Axial, Harmonic, Displacement Excitation..14

EFFECTIVE MODAL MASS & MODAL PARTICIPATION FACTORS Revision F

Hydroelastic vibration of a rectangular perforated plate with a simply supported boundary condition

Lecture 8: Assembly of beam elements.

Structural Dynamics. Spring mass system. The spring force is given by and F(t) is the driving force. Start by applying Newton s second law (F=ma).

Introduction to Finite Element Method

Chapter 3 Variational Formulation & the Galerkin Method

Introduction to Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

TWO-STAGE ISOLATION FOR HARMONIC BASE EXCITATION Revision A. By Tom Irvine February 25, 2008

Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 13

ABSTRACT Modal parameters obtained from modal testing (such as modal vectors, natural frequencies, and damping ratios) have been used extensively in s

Chapter 12 Elastic Stability of Columns

D && 9.0 DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

A Guide to linear dynamic analysis with Damping

PART I. Basic Concepts

Finite element analysis of rotating structures

CHAPTER 14 BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF 1D AND 2D STRUCTURES

Structural Dynamics Lecture 7. Outline of Lecture 7. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems (cont.) System Reduction. Vibration due to Movable Supports.

Prepared by M. GUNASHANKAR AP/MECH DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Table of Contents. Preface... 13

midas Civil Dynamic Analysis

Dynamics of Structures

Finite Element Method-Part II Isoparametric FE Formulation and some numerical examples Lecture 29 Smart and Micro Systems

Slender Structures Load carrying principles

Introduction to Mechanical Vibration

Parametric Identification of a Cable-stayed Bridge using Substructure Approach

Some Aspects of Structural Dynamics

Truncation Errors Numerical Integration Multiple Support Excitation

Chapter 7 Vibration Measurement and Applications

FINAL EXAMINATION. (CE130-2 Mechanics of Materials)

10. Applications of 1-D Hermite elements

Finite Element Analysis Lecture 1. Dr./ Ahmed Nagib

Toward a novel approach for damage identification and health monitoring of bridge structures

Chapter 5 Elastic Strain, Deflection, and Stability 1. Elastic Stress-Strain Relationship

SPECIAL DYNAMIC SOIL- STRUCTURE ANALYSIS PROCEDURES DEMONSTATED FOR TWO TOWER-LIKE STRUCTURES

CE 6701 Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Dr. P. Venkateswara Rao

Multiple Degree of Freedom Systems. The Millennium bridge required many degrees of freedom to model and design with.

MECh300H Introduction to Finite Element Methods. Finite Element Analysis (F.E.A.) of 1-D Problems

Response Spectrum Analysis Shock and Seismic. FEMAP & NX Nastran

3. Mathematical Properties of MDOF Systems

. D CR Nomenclature D 1

Experimental Modal Analysis of a Flat Plate Subjected To Vibration

Finite Element Method

Collocated versus non-collocated control [H04Q7]

Seismic Design of Tall and Slender Structures Including Rotational Components of the Ground Motion: EN Approach

Dynamics of Ocean Structures Prof. Dr. Srinivasan Chandrasekaran Department of Ocean Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Introduction to Vibration. Professor Mike Brennan

Transcription:

2C9 Design for seismic and climate changes Jiří Máca

List of lectures 1. Elements of seismology and seismicity I 2. Elements of seismology and seismicity II 3. Dynamic analysis of single-degree-of-freedom systems I 4. Dynamic analysis of single-degree-of-freedom systems II 5. Dynamic analysis of single-degree-of-freedom systems III 6. Dynamic analysis of multi-degree-of-freedom systems 7. Finite element method in structural dynamics I 8. Finite element method in structural dynamics II 9. Earthquake analysis I 2

Finite element method in structural dynamics I Free vibration analysis 1. Finite element method in structural dynamics 2. Free vibration 3. Rayleigh Ritz method 4. Vector iteration techniques 5. Inverse vector iteration method + examples 6. Subspace iteration method 7. Examples

1. FINIE ELEMEN MEHOD IN SRUCURAL DYNAMICS Statics Kr f K A Ke N e e1 V K e B DB Dynamics dv Mr ( t) Kr( t) 0 Mr ( t) Cr ( t) Kr( t) f( t) Forces do not vary with time Structural stiffness K considered only N A e Operator e 1 denotes the direct assembly procedure for assembling the stiffness matrix for each element, e = 1 to N e, where N e is the number of elements Free vibration No external forces present Structural stiffness K and mass M considered Forced vibration External forces (usually time dependent) present Structural stiffness K, mass M and possibly damping C considered

Finite Element Method in structural dynamics Inertial force (per unit volume) ρ mass density Damping force (per unit volume) ξ damping coefficient f u f udv ˆi f u f udv ˆd i d V V Principle of virtual displacements WI W E internal virtual work = external virtual work W I ε σ dv σ stress vector ε strain vector V ˆ W u f dv u fˆ dv E i d V V

Finite Element Method in structural dynamics Finite Element context u Nr u Nr unr u r N u r N r nodal displacements N interpolation (shape) functions Strain displacement relations ε u Nr Br ε r B Constitutive relations (linear elastic material) σ D ε DBr D constitutive matrix

Finite Element Method in structural dynamics Internal virtual work ε σ r B DB r W I dv dv V V External virtual work W W E I 0 ˆ W u f dv u fˆ dv E i d V V dv V dv V u u u u V V dv r N N r r N N dvr r N N dv r N N dvr B DB dv r V V V Dynamic equations of equilibrium Mr Cr Kr 0 0 Mr Cr Kr f f nodal forces (external)

Finite Element Method in structural dynamics Mass matrix (consistent formulation) M N N V dv Damping matrix C N N V dv Stiffness matrix K B DB V dv Mass matrix - other possible formulations Diagonal mass matrix equal mass lumping lumped-mass idealization with equal diagonal terms special mass lumping - diagonal mass matrix, terms proportional to the consistent mass matrix

Finite Element Method in structural dynamics Beam element length L, modulus of elasticity E, cross-section area A moment of inertia (2nd moment of area) I z, uniform mass m Starting point approximation of displacements u uv, Exact solution (based on the assumptions adopted) - Approximation of axial displacements x x ux ( ) 1 u u huhu L L 1 2 1 1 2 2 u 1 left-end axial displacement u 2 right-end axial displacement

Beam element - Approximation of deflections 2 3 2 3 x x x x x vx ( ) 13 2 v1 2 L 1 L L L L L 2 3 2 3 x x x x 3 2 v2 L 2 L L L L vx ( ) hvh hv h 3 1 4 1 5 2 6 2 1 v1 1 v 1 h 3 v 2 2 v 1 left-end deflection v 2 right-end deflection φ 1 left-end rotation φ 2 right-end rotation 1 1 h 4 h 5 v2 1 2 1 h 6

Beam element Vector of nodal displacements r u, v,, u, v, Matrix of interpolation functions N 1 1 1 2 2 2 h1 0 0 h2 0 0 0 h3 h4 0 h5 h 6 u Nr Constitutive relations Strain displacement relations du Nx EA 0 dx 2 M z 0 EI z dv 2 dx σ D ε ε u Nr Br B dh1 dh2 0 0 0 0 dx dx dh dh dh dh 0 0 dx dx dx dx 2 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 2 2 2 2

Beam element Element stiffness matrix K L B DB 0 dx K EA EA 0 0 0 0 L L 12EI z 6EI z 12EI z 6EI z 0 0 3 2 3 2 L L L L 6EI z 4EI z 6EI z 2EI z 0 0 2 2 L L L L EA EA 0 0 0 0 L L 12EI 6EI 12EI 6EI 0 0 L L L L 6EI z 2EI z 6EI z 4EI z 0 0 2 2 L L L L z z z z 3 2 3 2

Beam element Element mass matrix consistent formulation L M N mn 0 dx M 140 0 0 70 0 0 156 22 L 0 54 13L 2 2 ml 4L 0 13L 3L 420 140 0 0 156 22 L 2 sym 4 L

Beam element Element mass matrix other possible approximation of deflections x x vx ( ) 1 v v hvhv L L Element mass matrix diagonal mass matrix vx ( ) hv hv 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 where h 1 =1 for x l/2 h 1 =0 for x>l/2 h 2 =0 for x < l/2 h 2 =1 for x l/2 140 0 0 70 0 0 140 0 0 70 0 ml 0 0 0 0 M 420 140 0 0 140 0 sym 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ml 0 0 0 0 M 2 1 0 0 1 0 sym 0

Comparison of Finite Element and exact solution

Comparison of Finite Element and exact solution Accuracy of FE analysis is improved by increasing number of DOFs

2. FREE VIBRAION natural vibration frequencies and modes Mr ( t) Kr( t) 0 equation of motion for undamped free vibration of MDOF system r ( t) ( A cos t B sin t) r n n n n n 2 ( t) nr( t) motions of a system in free vibrations are simple harmonic K M 0 2 n n 2 det n 0 free vibration equation, eigenvalue equation - natural mode ω n - natural frequency K M nontrivial solution condition n frequency equation (polynomial of order N) not a practical method for larger systems

3. RAYLEIGH RIZ MEHOD general technique for reducing the number of degrees of freedom K M 0 2 n n K M 0 K M K M Rayleigh s quotient Properties 1. When is an eigenvector n, Rayleigh s quotient is equal to the 2 corresponding eigenvalue n 2. Rayleigh s quotient is bounded between the smallest and largest eigenvalues 2 2 2 1 1 2 2... n n

Rayleigh Ritz method u ( t) Ψ z ( t) Ψ z displacements or modal shapes are expressed as a linear combination of shape vectors j, j = 1,2 J <N Ritz vectors make up the columns of N x J matrix Ψ z is a vector of J generalized coordinates substituting the Ritz transformation in a system of N equations of motion Ku Cu Ku sp() t we obtain a system of J equations in generalized coordinates mz cz kz sp () t m Ψ M Ψ c Ψ C Ψ k Ψ K Ψ s Ψ s Ritz transformation has made it possible to reduce original set of N equations in the nodal displacement u to a smaller set of J equations in the generalized coordinates z

Rayleigh Ritz method substituting the Ritz transformation in a Rayleigh s quotient K z Ψ K Ψ z M z Ψ M Ψ z ( z) z i 0 i1,2,... J ( ) z and using Rayleigh s stationary condition we obtain the reduced eigenvalue problem kz mz m Ψ M Ψ k Ψ K Ψ, z solution of all eigenvalues and eigenmodes e.g. Jacobi s method of rotations 2 2 2 1 1 2 2... J J i izi

Rayleigh Ritz method Selection of Ritz vectors Selection of Ritz vectors

4. VECOR IERAION ECHNIQUES Inverse iteration (Stodola-Vianello) Algorithm to determine the lowest eigenvalue Kx Mx x K Mx x 1 k1 k k1 k x k 1 k 1 1/2 ( xk 1Mxk1) k 1 1 as k x 1

Vector iteration techniques Forward iteration (Stodola-Vianello) Algorithm to determine the highest eigenvalue Mx Kx x M Kx x 1 k1 k k1 k k 1 k 1 1/2 ( xk 1Mxk1) n xk n as k 1 x

5. INVERSE VECOR IERAION MEHOD 1. Starting vector x! arbitrary choice R Mx 2. ( k 1) k1 k1 3. x Kx (Rayleigh s quotient) x Mx 4. Kx Kx 1 1 R 2 1 k1 Mx ( k1) ( k) ( k 1) k k1 k1 tol 5. If convergence criterion is not satisfied, normalize xk 1 x( k 1) 1/2 and go back to 2. and set k = k+1 x Mx k1 k1 x k1 1 K Mxk

Inverse vector iteration method 6. For the last iteration (k+1), when convergence is satisfied 2 ( k 1) 1 1 x k 1 1 ( k 1) 1/2 xk1mxk1 x Gramm-Schmidt orthogonalisation to progress to other than limiting eigenvalues (highest and lowest) evaluation of n1 correction of trial vector x x x Mx n j j1 jmj j

Inverse vector iteration method Vector iteration with shift μ the shifting concept enables computation of any eigenpair KM KKM eigenvectors of the two eigenvalue problems are the same inverse vector iteration converge to the eigenvalue closer to the shifted origin, e.g. to, see (c) 3

Inverse vector iteration method Example 3DOF frame, 1 st natural frequency k k 1,5 k k k 1,5 k K 1 flexibility matrix 2 2 2 1 δ 2 5 5 6k 2 5 8 m 0 0 M 0 m 0 0 0 m 2 2 2 m δm 2 5 5 6k 2 5 8 Kx Mx x K Mx Mx 1 k1 k k1 k k x 0 1 1 1 starting vector

Inverse vector iteration method 1 st iteration 6 1 m (1) xmx 1 0 k x1 δmx0 12 0, 489 x1 2 6k 1 1 m 15 xmx 2,5 2 nd iteration 11 1 m (2) xmx 2 1 k x2 δmx1 24,5 0, 481 x2 2, 23 6k 2 2 m 32 xmx 2,91 12, 28 1 m (3) xmx 3 2 k x3 δmx2 27,70 0,481 x3 2,26 6k 3 3 m 36, 43 xmx 2,97 (3) 1 0,694 k 1 x3 m 3 rd iteration normalization u1 1

Appendix flexibility matrix k k u u 3k 2k 2k m 1 m 2 m u 3 k 1,5 k δ k 1,5 k 2 2 2 1 2 5 5 6k 2 5 8 F 1 1 1 1 1 11 21 31 3k 3k 3k F 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 22 32 3k 3k 2k 3k 2k F 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 23 33 3k 3k 2k 3k 2k 2k

6. SUBSPACE IERAION MEHOD efficient method for eigensolution of large systems when only the lower modes are of interest similar to inverse iteration method - iteration is performed simultaneously on a number of trial vectors m m smaller of 2p and p+8, p is the number of modes to be determined (p is usually much less then N, number of DOF) 1. Staring vectors X 1 R MX 1 1 KX R 2 1 2. Subspace iteration a) KX k1 MX k b) Ritz transformation K k1 Xk 1KXk1 M k1xk1mxk1

Subspace iteration method 2. Subspace iteration cont. c) Reduced eigenvalue problem (m eigenvalues) K Q Ω M Q 2 k1 k1 k1 k1 k1 d) New vectors X X Q k1 k1 k1 e) Go back to 2 a) 3. Sturm sequence check verification that the required eigenvalues and vectors have been calculated - i.e. first p eigenpairs Subspace iteration method - combines vector iteration method with the transformation method

7. EXAMPLES Simple frame exact 3 6 12 solution elem elem elem f 1 [Hz] 7,270 7,282 7,270 7,270 f 2 [Hz] 28,693 34,285 28,845 28,711 EI = 32 000 knm 2 μ = 252 kgm -1 f 3 [Hz] 46,799 74,084 47,084 46,854 1. shape of vibration 2. shape of vibration 3. shape of vibration

Examples Simple frame exact 3 6 solution elem elem f 1 [Hz] 28,662 34,285 28,845 f 2 [Hz] 41,863 65,623 42,393 EI = 32 000 knm 2 μ = 252 kgm -1 f 3 [Hz] 50,653-51,474 1. shape of vibration Recommendation: it is good to divide beams into (at least) 2 elements in the dynamic FE analysis

Examples 3-D frame (turbomachinery frame foundation)

Examples 3-D frame (turbo-machinery frame foundation)

Examples 3-D frame (turbo-machinery frame foundation)

Examples 3-D frame + plate + elastic foundation

Examples cable-stayed bridge

Examples cable-stayed bridge

Examples cable-stayed bridge