Symmetric Spaces. Andrew Fiori. Sept McGill University

Similar documents
Geometry of symmetric R-spaces

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

1. Quadratic lattices A quadratic lattice is a free abelian group M of finite rank equipped with a symmetric bilinear form.

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

NEW REALIZATIONS OF THE MAXIMAL SATAKE COMPACTIFICATIONS OF RIEMANNIAN SYMMETRIC SPACES OF NON-COMPACT TYPE. 1. Introduction and the main results

Minimal surfaces in quaternionic symmetric spaces

1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 6 Feb 1998

Eric Hofmann. AKLS Seminar Aachen, March 3, TU Darmstadt. Borcherds Products on Unitary Groups. Eric Hofmann. Setup.

On the Harish-Chandra Embedding

Mostow Rigidity. W. Dison June 17, (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and

EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients.

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

274 Curves on Surfaces, Lecture 4

Hermitian Symmetric Spaces

Kleinian groups Background

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications

Introduction to Selberg Trace Formula.

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights

Norm computation and analytic continuation of holomorphic discrete series

The Spinor Representation

SYMMETRIC SUBGROUP ACTIONS ON ISOTROPIC GRASSMANNIANS

Questions in the Theory of Orthogonal Shimura Varieties

Combinatorics and geometry of E 7

Left-invariant Einstein metrics

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction

Background on c-projective geometry

HOMOGENEOUS VECTOR BUNDLES

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE COARSE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE. Nigel Higson. Unpublished Note, 1999

CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARIES

LECTURE 9: MOVING FRAMES IN THE NONHOMOGENOUS CASE: FRAME BUNDLES. 1. Introduction

COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II

Smooth Dynamics 2. Problem Set Nr. 1. Instructor: Submitted by: Prof. Wilkinson Clark Butler. University of Chicago Winter 2013

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

Lectures on Lie groups and geometry

X-RAY TRANSFORM ON DAMEK-RICCI SPACES. (Communicated by Jan Boman)

H-projective structures and their applications

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 31 Oct 2008

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 28 Jan 2009

CLASSICAL PERIOD DOMAINS

where m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Summary of Prof. Yau s lecture, Monday, April 2 [with additional references and remarks] (for people who missed the lecture)

14 From modular forms to automorphic representations

A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS. Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach

Published as: Math. Ann. 295 (1993)

Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory

Geometry of moduli spaces

Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces

Workshop on the occasion of the 70th birthday of. Francesco Mercuri. Universität zu Köln. Classical Symmetric Spaces. Gudlaugur Thorbergsson

An overview of Patterson-Sullivan theory

The parallelism of shape operator related to the generalized Tanaka-Webster connection on real hypersurfaces in complex two-plane Grassmannians

William P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday September 1, 2015 (Day 1)

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday January 20, 2015 (Day 1)

z, w = z 1 w 1 + z 2 w 2 z, w 2 z 2 w 2. d([z], [w]) = 2 φ : P(C 2 ) \ [1 : 0] C ; [z 1 : z 2 ] z 1 z 2 ψ : P(C 2 ) \ [0 : 1] C ; [z 1 : z 2 ] z 2 z 1

HARMONIC MAPS INTO GRASSMANNIANS AND A GENERALIZATION OF DO CARMO-WALLACH THEOREM

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

The Real Grassmannian Gr(2, 4)

An introduction to the geometry of homogeneous spaces

Holomorphic line bundles

Notation. For any Lie group G, we set G 0 to be the connected component of the identity.

Kähler manifolds and variations of Hodge structures

REGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES

Trace fields of knots

Parabolic subgroups Montreal-Toronto 2018

Rational Homogeneous Manifold and its Rigidity

A CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

K3 Surfaces and Lattice Theory

SYMMETRIES OF SECTIONAL CURVATURE ON 3 MANIFOLDS. May 27, 1992

Isometries, Local Isometries, Riemannian Coverings and Submersions, Killing Vector Fields

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 19 Mar 2018

Stable bundles with small c 2 over 2-dimensional complex tori

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 19 Nov 2009

MAXIMALLY NON INTEGRABLE PLANE FIELDS ON THURSTON GEOMETRIES

9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up

Lectures on locally symmetric spaces and arithmetic groups

Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

ANNIHILATING POLYNOMIALS, TRACE FORMS AND THE GALOIS NUMBER. Seán McGarraghy

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An introduction to Higher Teichmüller theory: Anosov representations for rank one people

NilBott Tower of Aspherical Manifolds and Torus Actions

Hermitian Symmetric Domains

Mathematical Research Letters 2, (1995) A VANISHING THEOREM FOR SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS. Shuguang Wang

Killing Vector Fields of Constant Length on Riemannian Normal Homogeneous Spaces

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

Cobordant differentiable manifolds

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

VINCENT PECASTAING. University of Luxembourg, Mathematics Research Unit Maison du nombre, 6 avenue de la Fonte L-4364 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg 1

THE ISOPARAMETRIC STORY

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

Transcription:

McGill University Sept 2010

What are Hermitian? A Riemannian manifold M is called a Riemannian symmetric space if for each point x M there exists an involution s x which is an isometry of M and a neighbourhood N x of x where x is the unique fixed point of s x in N x. A Riemannian symmetric space M is said to be Hermitian if M has a complex structure making the Riemannian structure a Hermitian structure.

What are they concretely? Theorem Let M be a Riemannian symmetric space and x M be any point. Furthermore, let G = Isom(M) and K = Stab G (x). Then G is a real Lie group, K is a compact subgroup and G/K M. Moreover, we have that the involution s x extends to an involution of G with (G sx ) 0 K G sx. Theorem If in particular M is a Hermitian symmetric space, then SO 2 (R) Z(K). If moreover M is irreducible and Z(G) = {e} then Z(K) = SO 2 (R). We remark that because Isom(M) acts transitively, it suffices to specifty s x for a single point x.

Example - The Upper half plane The upper half plane H = {x + iy C y > 0}, with metric 1 y 2 (dx 2 + dy 2 ) is a Hermitian Symmetric space. The isometry group is G = Isom(H) PSL 2 (R) PSO(2, 1)(R). The action on H is through fractional linear transformation ( a b ) c d τ = aτ+b cτ+d. Fixing i H as the base point, the compact subgroup is K = Stab G (i) = PSO 2 (R) SO 2 (R). At the point i H the involution is τ 1 τ. The extension of this involution to G is s i : g (g T ) 1.

The Lie Algebra Structures Given that M = G/K we are naturally drawn to look at the Lie algebra structure of g = Lie(G). The Killing form on g is B(X, Y ) = Tr(Ad(X ) Ad(Y )). We make several observations: 1 The Lie algebra decomposes as g = k + p, where k is the Lie algebra for K and p = k relative to B. 2 The involution s x on M induces an involution on g such that: s x : k + p k p. 3 Since K is compact it follows that B k is negative-definite. A Cartan involution θ : g g is an R-linear map such that B(X, θ(y )) is negative-definite. A decomposition of g into the +1, 1 eigenspaces for a Cartan involution is called a Cartan decomposition.

Decomposition of A symmetric space M is said to be: Compact Type if B p negative-definite (if and only if g is compact). Non-Compact Type if B p positive-definite (if and only if s x is a Cartan involution). Euclidean Type if B p = 0. Theorem Every symmetric space M can be decomposed into a product M = M c M nc M e where the factors are of compact, non-compact and Euclidean types respectively.

Dual Symmetric Pairs Studying modular forms on G/K requires constructing interesting vector bundles. In the non-compact case this is done via an embedding into a projective variety. We shall now work towards obtaining such an embedding. Given a Riemannian symmetric space M with associated Lie algebra g = k + p, we define the dual Lie algebra (for the pair (g, k)) to be: g = k + ip g C. If g was compact (resp non-compact, resp Euclidean) type then g is non-compact (resp compact, resp Euclidean) type. One typically can associate to this dual Lie algebra an associated Lie real group Ğ G C such that K Ğ and symmetric space Ğ/K. For the remainder of this talk, G/K will be a Hermitian symmetric space of the non-compact type with Ğ/K the dual symmetric space of the compact type.

Embedding into the Compact Dual Theorem Let U be the center of K and u be its Lie algebra. The action of u C on g C decomposes g C into three eigenspaces: the 0-eigenspace k C and two others we shall denote p + and p. The Lie algebra k C + p is then parabolic. Moreover Theorem (k C + p ) g = k. Let P G C be the parabolic subgroup associated to k C + p. Then: G/K G C /P Ğ/K This is an open immersion of G/K into the complex projective variety G C /P,which is isomorphic to the compact dual M = Ğ/K. The maps are induced by the inclusions G G C and Ğ G C We have that G C /P is a generalized flag manifold.

The O(2,n) Case Let (V, x.y) be a rational quadratic space of signature (2, n). We define the Grassmannian by and the quadric by Gr(V ) = {positive-definite planes in V (R)} Q = {v P(V (C)) with X.X = 0 and X.X > 0}. The group G = PSO(2, n)(r) acts transitively on positive-definite planes in V (R) and thus on Gr(V ). Likewise it acts transitively on Q. The kernal of these actions is K = PS(O(2) O(n)). Moreover, Gr(V ) Q. Removing the conditions positive-definite equivalently X.X > 0 we shall obtain the compact dual and the map M M.

The O(2,n) Case (Lie Algebra) Fix a plane x Gr(V ). Define s x to be the map of V (R) which acts as the identity on x and as 1 on x. This gives a map s x on Gr(V ) which lifts to an involution of PSO(2, n)(r) via conjugation by s x. One can then check that PSO(2, n)(r) sx = PS(O(2) O(n)) = Stab G (x) = K. The Lie algebra of G is g = Lie(G) {( A with g decomposing into k = {( A 0 0 C U U T C ) A, C skew-symmetric } ) } {( g and p = 0 U )} U T 0. The Killing form on p is given by B p (U 1, U 2 ) = Tr(U 1 U T 2 ). Identifying p = p x with the tangent space at x Gr(V ) the Killing form induces a G-invariant Riemannian metric on Gr(V ).

The O(2,n) Case (The Dual) The Compact Dual dual group is Ğ = PSO(2 + n)(r). Its Lie algebra is given by: {( ) } g = Lie(Ğ) A U U T C A, C skew-symmetric. with p the subspace given by {( 0 U U T 0 )}. The group Ğ has a natural transitive action on {planes in V (R)}. The stabilizer of the plane x for ths action of Ğ is again K. The inclusion of Gr(V ) into {planes in V (R)} thus realizes the embedding of G/K into the compact dual Ğ/K. The boundary components of Gr(V ) in this larger space come from isotropic subspaces, we remark that G acts transitively on these.

Locally Let M = G/K be a symmetric space and Γ be a discrete subgroup of G then X = Γ\M is a locally symmetric space. (One is often interested in the cases where Γ is torsion free and has finite covolume so that X is more manageable) For the case of the orthogonal group, let L be a full lattice in V then SO L G = SO V (R) is discrete and and has finite co-volume. We may thus consider the locally symmetric space X = SO L \G/K. In general there exists a natural compactification X which may be realized by adjoining to M its rational boundary components in M. In the orthogonal case, these boundary components correspond to rational isotropic subspaces.

Modular Forms Let Q be the image of M = G/K in some projective space embedding of M = G C /P and let Q be the cone over Q. A modular form f for Γ of weight k on M can be thought of as any of the equivalent notions: 1 A section of Γ\(O M( k) M ) on Γ\M. 2 A function on Q homogeneous of degree k which is invariant under the action of Γ. 3 A function on Q which transforms with respect to the k th power of the factor of automorphy under Γ. To be a meromorphic (resp. holomorphic) modular form we require that f extends to the boundary and that it be meromorphic (resp. holomorphic). One may also consider forms which are holomorphic on the space but are only meromorphic on the boundary.

The End Thank you.