Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario

Similar documents
Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Traffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Feasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario

3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18

Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3)

1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8

Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY. Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3

APPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West. Mississauga, Ontario

Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department

GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE

Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls

COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD?

Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control. Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering

Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back

Acoustic spaces: comfort and social sustainability

Appendix G Noise Modeling Files

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Chapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming

Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT

1 Wind Turbine Acoustics. Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic

3D ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE FROM ROADS OF THE ADELAIDE CBD AND THEIR IMPACT ON BUILDINGS

Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd ISESEE, Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2008

APPENDIX B. Noise Primer

DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING The EXO Building at Point Village North Wall Quay & East Wall Road, Dublin 1.

conceptdesigns C0NCEPTDESIGNSARCHITETURE.CO.NZ architecture S t a g e Gisborne Beach House

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis

Rio Tinto- Compagnie minière IOC

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:

Fundamentals of Sound

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

PAUL RUDOLPH Oriental Masonic Gardens

WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. January 9, 2015

research highlight Wind-Rain Relationships in Southwestern British Columbia Introduction Methodology Figure 2 Lower Mainland meteorological stations

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering TRAFFIC AND AIRFLOW NOISE LEVEL PREDICTIONS FOR BUILDINGS WITH

Energy Use in Homes 2007

Monitoring Survey in the Vicinity of St. Marys Cement: Interim Report

A simple model for estimating excess attenuation of road traffic noise

1600 Prairie Drive , FAX

FUNDAMENTALS OF HVAC

1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC

ACOUSTICS 1.01 Pantone 144 U & Pantone 5405 U

Double-Skin Facade in Low-Latitude: Study on the Absorptance, Reflectance, and Transmittance of Direct Solar Radiation

Energy Use in Homes. A series of reports on domestic energy use in England. Energy Efficiency

Re: Draft OPA 320 Recommended Amendments to Various Neighbourhood Policies Statutory Public Meeting to be held on Monday 16 November 2015

ARCHITECTURE IN THE DAYLIGHT

schematic lighting design courtesy of william rawn associates

VIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

MAPPING OF NOISE BY USING GIS IN ŞANLIURFA. 1. Introduction

Occupant Behavior Related to Space Cooling in a High Rise Residential Building Located in a Tropical Region N.F. Mat Hanip 1, S.A. Zaki 1,*, A. Hagish

THE IMPLICATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDING ENVELOPE DETAILS FOR ICE AND SNOW FORMATION PATTERNS ON BUILDINGS

PROPAGATION, NOISE CRITERIA

Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4

White Paper Luminance & Illuminance. Brief explanation of photometry for the application of tunnel lighting control

Speed Limit Review. Montague Road, West End. Prepared for Brisbane City Council CEB06842 CEB06842

CHAPTER 3. The sun and the seasons. Locating the position of the sun

Institut national des sciences appliquées de Strasbourg GENIE CLIMATIQUE ET ENERGETIQUE APPENDICES

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

Looking at Communities: Comparing Urban and Rural Neighborhoods

FINAL REPORT. On Project Supplemental Guidance on the Application of FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) APPENDIX J Wind and Temperature Gradients

ACOUSTICAL IMPACT OF TRAFFIC FLOWING EQUIPMENTS IN URBAN AREA

NOISE PREDICTION, CALCULATION AND MAPPING USING SPECIALIZED SOFTWARE

1.0 BACKGROUND. January 6, 2006 Proj #

APPENDIX Q BLASTING IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

METRO Blue Line LRT Extension (BLRT) 5514 West Broadway Avenue, Suite 200, Crystal, MN

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

Solar Control in Traditional Architecture, Potentials for Passive Design in Hot and Arid Climate

Transcription:

407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-042 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Tony Kazarian AK Global Management Inc. 680 Eagleson Road Ottawa, Ontario K2M 2G9 Canada Prepared By: Omar Daher, B.Eng., EIT, Noise Specialist Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Partner April 12, 2017 127 Walgreen Road, Ottawa, Ontario K0A 1L0 T (613) 836-0934 www.gradientwind.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document describes a roadway traffic noise assessment performed for a proposed four-storey residential development located at 407, 411, and 417 Nelson Street in Ottawa, Ontario. The major source of transportation noise is Somerset Street East. Figure 1 illustrates a complete site plan with surrounding context. The assessment is based on: (i) theoretical noise prediction methods that conform to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) and City of Ottawa requirements; (ii) noise level criteria as specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG); (iii) future vehicular traffic volumes based on the City of Ottawa s Official Plan roadway classifications; and (iv) site plan drawings received from Robertson Martin Architects dated March 31 st, 2017. The results of the current analysis indicate that noise levels will range between 39 and 46 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 31 and 38 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 46 dba) occurs along the south facing façade of the development, which is nearest to Somerset Street East. As all noise levels are below the ENCG criteria of 55 dba, no additional mitigation measures are needed. As outdoor noise levels are less than 55 dba, indoor noise levels below 45 dba are expected. i

CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE... 1 3. OBJECTIVES... 1 4. METHODOLOGY... 2 4.1 Background... 2 4.2 Roadway Traffic Noise... 2 4.2.1 Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise... 2 4.2.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes... 3 4.2.3 Theoretical Transportation Noise Predictions... 4 4.3 Indoor Noise Calculations... 4 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION... 5 5.1 Roadway Traffic Noise Levels... 5 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 5 FIGURES APPENDICES: Appendix A STAMSON 5.04 Input and Output Data ii

1. INTRODUCTION Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. (GWE) was retained by AK Global Construction & Development Inc. to undertake a roadway traffic noise assessment of a proposed four-storey residential development located at 407, 411, and 417 Nelson Street in Ottawa, Ontario. This report summarizes the methodology, results, and recommendations related to this roadway traffic noise assessment. GWE s scope of work involved assessing exterior and interior noise levels generated by local roadway traffic. The assessment was performed based on theoretical noise calculation methods conforming to the City of Ottawa 1 and Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) 2 guidelines. Noise calculations were based on architectural drawings received from Robertson Martin Architects dated March 31 st, 2017, with future traffic volumes corresponding to the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) roadway classifications. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The focus of this roadway traffic noise assessment is a proposed four-storey residential building. The site is located near the Nelson Street and Osgoode intersection. The footprint of the building is expected to encompass the land comprising 407, 411, and 417 Nelson Street. The building is expected to be 14.4 metres above grade. Surrounding the site are residential properties in all directions. A potential outdoor amenity space is located east of the development. The major source of transportation noise is Somerset Street. Figure 1 illustrates a complete site plan with surrounding context. 3. OBJECTIVES The main goals of this work are to: (i) calculate the future noise levels on the study building produced by local roadway traffic, and (ii) ensure that interior and exterior noise levels do not exceed the allowable limits specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines as outlined in Section 4 of this report. 1 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, January 2016 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Environmental Noise Guidelines, Publication NPC-300, Queens Printer for Ontario, Toronto, 2013 1

4. METHODOLOGY 4.1 Background Noise can be defined as any obtrusive sound. It is created at a source, transmitted through a medium, such as air, and intercepted by a receiver. Noise may be characterized in terms of the power of the source or the sound pressure at a specific distance. While the power of a source is characteristic of that particular source, the sound pressure depends on the location of the receiver and the path that the noise takes to reach the receiver. Measurement of noise is based on the decibel unit, dba, which is a logarithmic ratio referenced to a standard noise level (2 10-5 Pascals). The A suffix refers to a weighting scale, which better represents how the noise is perceived by the human ear. With this scale, a doubling of power results in a 3 dba increase in measured noise levels and is just perceptible to most people. An increase of 10 dba is often perceived to be twice as loud. 4.2 Roadway Traffic Noise 4.2.1 Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise For vehicle traffic, the equivalent sound energy level, L eq, provides a measure of the time varying noise levels, which is well correlated with the annoyance of sound. It is defined as the continuous sound level, which has the same energy as a time varying noise level over a period of time. For roadways, the L eq is commonly calculated based on a 16-hour (L eq16) daytime (07:00-23:00) / 8-hour (L eq8) nighttime (23:00-07:00) split to assess its impact on residential buildings. The City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG) specifies that the recommended indoor noise limit range (that is relevant to this study) is 45 and 40 dba for living rooms and sleeping quarters respectively, as listed in Table 1. 2

TABLE 1: INDOOR SOUND LEVEL CRITERIA (ROAD & RAIL) 3 Type of Space Time Period Road L eq (dba) General offices, reception areas, retail stores, etc. 07:00 23:00 50 45 Living/dining/den areas of residences, hospitals, schools, nursing/retirement homes, day-care centres, theatres, places of worship, libraries, individual or semi-private offices, conference rooms, etc. Rail 07:00 23:00 45 40 Sleeping quarters of hotels/motels 23:00 07:00 45 40 Sleeping quarters of residences, hospitals, nursing/retirement homes, etc. 23:00 07:00 40 35 Predicted noise levels at the plane of window (POW) and outdoor living area (OLA) dictate the action required to achieve the recommended sound levels. An open window is considered to provide a 10 dba reduction in noise while a standard closed window is capable of providing a minimum 20 dba noise reduction. Therefore, where noise levels exceed 55 dba daytime and 50 dba nighttime, the ventilation for the building should consider the need for having windows and doors closed, which normally triggers the need for central air conditioning (or similar systems). Where noise levels exceed 65 dba daytime and 60 dba nighttime, building components will require higher levels of sound attenuation. 4.2.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes The ENCG dictates that noise calculations should consider future sound levels based on a roadway s classification at the mature state of development. Therefore, traffic volumes are based on the roadway classifications outlined in the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) and Transportation Master Plan 4 which provide additional details on future roadway expansions. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes are then based on data in Table B1 of the ENCG for each roadway classification. Table 2 (below) summarizes the AADT values used for each roadway included in this assessment. 3 Adapted from ENCG 2016 Tables 2.2b and 2.2c 4 City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan, November 2013 3

TABLE 2: ROADWAY TRAFFIC DATA Segment Roadway / Transit Class Speed Limit (km/h) Traffic Volumes Somerset Street East 2-UCU 40 8,000 4.2.3 Theoretical Transportation Noise Predictions Noise predictions were performed with the aid of the MOECC computerized noise assessment program, STAMSON 5.04, for road and rail analysis. Appendix A includes the STAMSON 5.04 input and output data. Roadway traffic noise calculations were performed by treating each roadway segment as separate line sources of noise, and by using existing building locations as noise barriers. In addition to the traffic volumes summarized in Table 2, theoretical noise predictions were based on the following parameters: Truck traffic on all roadways was taken to comprise 5% heavy trucks and 7% medium trucks, as per ENCG requirements for noise level predictions The day/night split was taken to be 92% / 8% respectively for all streets Absorptive and reflective intermediate ground surfaces based on specific source-receiver path ground characteristics Topography considered in height parameters Noise receptors were strategically placed at 5 locations around the study area (see Figure 2). 4.3 Indoor Noise Calculations The difference between outdoor and indoor noise levels is the noise attenuation provided by the building envelope. According to common industry practice, complete walls and individual wall elements are rated according to the Sound Transmission Class (STC). The STC ratings of common residential walls built in conformance with the Ontario Building Code (2012) typically exceed STC 35, depending on exterior cladding, thickness and interior finish details. For example, concrete and masonry walls can achieve STC 50 or more. Curtain wall systems typically provide around STC 35, depending on the glazing elements. Standard good quality double-glazed non-operable windows can have STC ratings ranging from 25 to 40, depending on the window manufacturer, pane thickness and inter-pane spacing. As previously mentioned, the windows are the known weak point in a partition. 4

As discussed in Section 4.2.1, when daytime noise levels (from road and rail sources) at the plane of the window exceed 65 dba, calculations must be performed to evaluate the sound transmission quality of the building components to ensure acceptable indoor noise levels. 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 5.1 Roadway Traffic Noise Levels The results of the roadway traffic noise calculations are summarized in Table 3 below. A complete set of input and output data from all STAMSON 5.04 calculations are available in Appendix A. Receptor Number TABLE 3: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS DUE TO ROADWAY TRAFFIC SOURCES Plane of Window Receptor Location Noise Level (dba) Day Night 1 POW-North Façade- 4 th floor 39 31 2 POW-West Façade- 4 th floor 46 38 3 POW-South Façade- 4 th floor 46 38 4 POW-East Façade- 4 th floor 40 32 5 OLA-Grade level 43 35 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the current analysis indicate that noise levels will range between 39 and 46 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 31 and 38 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 46 dba) occurs along the development s south facing façade, which are nearest to Somerset Street East. As all noise levels are below the ENCG criteria of 55 dba, no additional mitigation measures are needed. As outdoor noise levels are less than 55 dba, indoor noise levels below 45 dba are expected. 5

APPENDIX A STAMSON 5.04 - INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA A1

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 06-04-2017 15:39:54 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Somerset (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Somerset (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 129.00 / 129.00 m Receiver height : 12.70 / 12.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 14.40 m Barrier receiver distance : 0.10 / 0.10 m Source elevation : 59.00 m Receiver elevation : 69.00 m Barrier elevation : 69.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A2

Results segment # 1: Somerset (day) - Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! 12.68! 81.68 ROAD (0.00 + 38.95 + 0.00) = 38.95 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90 90 0.00 63.96 0.00-9.34 0.00 0.00 0.00-15.66 38.95 Segment Leq : 38.95 dba Total Leq All Segments: 38.95 dba A3

Results segment # 1: Somerset (night) - Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! 12.68! 81.68 ROAD (0.00 + 31.36 + 0.00) = 31.36 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90 90 0.00 56.36 0.00-9.34 0.00 0.00 0.00-15.66 31.36 Segment Leq : 31.36 dba Total Leq All Segments: 31.36 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 38.95 (NIGHT): 31.36 A4

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 06-04-2017 15:40:02 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Somerset (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Somerset (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg 17.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 100.00 / 100.00 m Receiver height : 12.70 / 12.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : 0.00 deg Angle2 : 8.00 deg Barrier height : 10.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 6.00 / 6.00 m Source elevation : 59.00 m Receiver elevation : 69.00 m Barrier elevation : 69.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A5

Road data, segment # 2: Somserset 2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Somerset 2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : 17.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 100.00 / 100.00 m Receiver height : 12.70 / 12.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : 17.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 6.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 89.00 / 89.00 m Source elevation : 63.00 m Receiver elevation : 69.00 m Barrier elevation : 69.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A6

Results segment # 1: Somerset (day) - Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! 11.43! 80.43 ROAD (0.00 + 42.19 + 42.71) = 45.47 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 0 8 0.00 63.96 0.00-8.24-13.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.19* 0 8 0.00 63.96 0.00-8.24-13.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.19 8 17 0.00 63.96 0.00-8.24-13.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.71 * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : 45.47 dba A7

Results segment # 2: Somserset 2 (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! -2.61! 66.39 ROAD (0.00 + 35.44 + 0.00) = 35.44 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 17 90 0.00 63.96 0.00-8.24-3.92 0.00 0.00-16.36 35.44 Segment Leq : 35.44 dba Total Leq All Segments: 45.88 dba A8

Results segment # 1: Somerset (night) - Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! 11.43! 80.43 ROAD (0.00 + 34.60 + 35.11) = 37.87 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 0 8 0.00 56.36 0.00-8.24-13.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.60* 0 8 0.00 56.36 0.00-8.24-13.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.60 8 17 0.00 56.36 0.00-8.24-13.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.11 * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : 37.87 dba A9

Results segment # 2: Somserset 2 (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! -2.61! 66.39 ROAD (0.00 + 27.84 + 0.00) = 27.84 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 17 90 0.00 56.36 0.00-8.24-3.92 0.00 0.00-16.36 27.84 Segment Leq : 27.84 dba Total Leq All Segments: 38.28 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 45.88 (NIGHT): 38.28 A10

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 10-04-2017 13:29:25 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Somerset (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Somerset (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 97.00 / 97.00 m Receiver height : 12.70 / 12.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 6.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 88.00 / 88.00 m Source elevation : 59.00 m Receiver elevation : 69.00 m Barrier elevation : 59.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A11

Results segment # 1: Somerset (day) - Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! 3.46! 62.46 ROAD (0.00 + 45.55 + 0.00) = 45.55 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90 90 0.00 63.96 0.00-8.11 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.30 45.55 Segment Leq : 45.55 dba Total Leq All Segments: 45.55 dba A12

Results segment # 1: Somerset (night) - Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! 3.46! 62.46 ROAD (0.00 + 37.95 + 0.00) = 37.95 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90 90 0.00 56.36 0.00-8.11 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.30 37.95 Segment Leq : 37.95 dba Total Leq All Segments: 37.95 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 45.55 (NIGHT): 37.95 A13

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 06-04-2017 15:40:14 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r4.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Somerset (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Somerset (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg -22.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 103.00 / 103.00 m Receiver height : 12.70 / 12.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : -22.00 deg Barrier height : 10.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 92.00 / 92.00 m Source elevation : 59.00 m Receiver elevation : 69.00 m Barrier elevation : 69.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A14

Road data, segment # 2: Somserset 2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Somserset 2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -22.00 deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 103.00 / 103.00 m Receiver height : 12.70 / 12.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -15.00 deg Angle2 : 0.00 deg Barrier height : 10.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 92.00 / 92.00 m Source elevation : 59.00 m Receiver elevation : 69.00 m Barrier elevation : 69.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A15

Results segment # 1: Somerset (day) - Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! -6.24! 62.76 ROAD (0.00 + 33.11 + 0.00) = 33.11 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90-22 0.00 63.96 0.00-8.37-4.23 0.00 0.00-18.25 33.11 Segment Leq : 33.11 dba A16

Results segment # 2: Somserset 2 (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! -6.24! 62.76 ROAD (38.70 + 24.80 + 0.00) = 38.87 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -22-15 0.32 63.96 0.00-11.08-14.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.70-15 0 0.00 63.96 0.00-8.37-10.79 0.00 0.00-20.00 24.80 Segment Leq : 38.87 dba Total Leq All Segments: 39.89 dba Results segment # 1: Somerset (night) - Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! -6.24! 62.76 ROAD (0.00 + 25.52 + 0.00) = 25.52 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90-22 0.00 56.36 0.00-8.37-4.23 0.00 0.00-18.25 25.52 Segment Leq : 25.52 dba A17

Results segment # 2: Somserset 2 (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! -6.24! 62.76 ROAD (31.11 + 17.20 + 0.00) = 31.28 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -22-15 0.32 56.36 0.00-11.08-14.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.11-15 0 0.00 56.36 0.00-8.37-10.79 0.00 0.00-20.00 17.20 Segment Leq : 31.28 dba Total Leq All Segments: 32.30 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 39.89 (NIGHT): 32.30 A18

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 10-04-2017 14:30:51 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r5.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Somerset (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Somerset (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg -24.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 113.00 / 113.00 m Receiver height : 12.70 / 12.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : -24.00 deg Barrier height : 10.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 53.00 / 53.00 m Source elevation : 59.00 m Receiver elevation : 69.00 m Barrier elevation : 69.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A19

Road data, segment # 2: Somserset 2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Somserset 2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -24.00 deg 13.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 113.00 / 113.00 m Receiver height : 12.70 / 12.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -12.00 deg Angle2 : 13.00 deg Barrier height : 10.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 104.00 / 104.00 m Source elevation : 59.00 m Receiver elevation : 69.00 m Barrier elevation : 69.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A20

Results segment # 1: Somerset (day) - Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! 2.75! 71.75 ROAD (0.00 + 38.51 + 0.00) = 38.51 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90-24 0.00 63.96 0.00-8.77-4.36 0.00 0.00-12.32 38.51 Segment Leq : 38.51 dba A21

Results segment # 2: Somserset 2 (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! -6.82! 62.18 ROAD (40.51 + 26.61 + 0.00) = 40.68 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -24-12 0.32 63.96 0.00-11.61-11.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.51-12 13 0.00 63.96 0.00-8.77-8.57 0.00 0.00-20.00 26.61 Segment Leq : 40.68 dba Total Leq All Segments: 42.74 dba Results segment # 1: Somerset (night) - Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! 2.75! 71.75 ROAD (0.00 + 30.91 + 0.00) = 30.91 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90-24 0.00 56.36 0.00-8.77-4.36 0.00 0.00-12.32 30.91 Segment Leq : 30.91 dba A22

Results segment # 2: Somserset 2 (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 12.70! -6.82! 62.18 ROAD (32.92 + 19.02 + 0.00) = 33.09 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -24-12 0.32 56.36 0.00-11.61-11.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.92-12 13 0.00 56.36 0.00-8.77-8.57 0.00 0.00-20.00 19.02 Segment Leq : 33.09 dba Total Leq All Segments: 35.15 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 42.74 (NIGHT): 35.15 A23