Topics in Representation Theory: SU(n), Weyl Chambers and the Diagram of a Group

Similar documents
Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Complex Structures

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

Topics in Representation Theory: The Weyl Integral and Character Formulas

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 7 11 May 2010

Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

The Weyl Character Formula

Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1.

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras

Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem

Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Topics in Representation Theory: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and the Exponential Map

THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT

Mic ael Flohr Representation theory of semi-simple Lie algebras: Example su(3) 6. and 20. June 2003

Induced Representations and Frobenius Reciprocity. 1 Generalities about Induced Representations

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

Group Theory - QMII 2017

Notes on Lie Algebras

IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS. Contents

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

Lie Algebras. Shlomo Sternberg

Introduction to Group Theory

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule

Weyl s Character Formula for Representations of Semisimple Lie Algebras

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Algebra Exam Syllabus

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

Notation. For any Lie group G, we set G 0 to be the connected component of the identity.

GRE Subject test preparation Spring 2016 Topic: Abstract Algebra, Linear Algebra, Number Theory.

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

Discrete Series and Characters of the Component Group

REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n

Linear Algebra 2 Spectral Notes

Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights

Math 108b: Notes on the Spectral Theorem

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER

2.4 Root space decomposition

Lecture notes for Mathematical Physics. Joseph A. Minahan 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy Box 516, SE Uppsala, Sweden

Notes 9: Eli Cartan s theorem on maximal tori.

MAT534 Fall 2013 Practice Midterm I The actual midterm will consist of five problems.

Math 3191 Applied Linear Algebra

Root systems. S. Viswanath

Lecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory

THE SEMISIMPLE SUBALGEBRAS OF EXCEPTIONAL LIE ALGEBRAS

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and the Exponential Map

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2.

(Kac Moody) Chevalley groups and Lie algebras with built in structure constants Lecture 1. Lisa Carbone Rutgers University

Dirac Cohomology, Orbit Method and Unipotent Representations

EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications

The Spinor Representation

A Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds

On exceptional completions of symmetric varieties

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

Cartan s Criteria. Math 649, Dan Barbasch. February 26

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

1.4 Solvable Lie algebras

Dynkin Diagrams or Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Lie Algebras (But Were Too Busy To Ask)

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 3 6 April 2010

e j = Ad(f i ) 1 2a ij/a ii

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

8. COMPACT LIE GROUPS AND REPRESENTATIONS

The following definition is fundamental.

A SHORT COURSE IN LIE THEORY

Lie Theory in Particle Physics

Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups

Kac-Moody Algebras. Ana Ros Camacho June 28, 2010

Classification of semisimple Lie algebras

MATH 223A NOTES 2011 LIE ALGEBRAS 35

Exercises Lie groups

Math 594. Solutions 5

HOMEWORK Graduate Abstract Algebra I May 2, 2004

Review problems for MA 54, Fall 2004.

Lecture 7: Positive Semidefinite Matrices

Lie Theory Through Examples. John Baez. Lecture 1

Spring 2018 CIS 610. Advanced Geometric Methods in Computer Science Jean Gallier Homework 3

Parabolic subgroups Montreal-Toronto 2018

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

THE CREMONA GROUP: LECTURE 1

Math 210C. Size of fundamental group

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

YOUNG-JUCYS-MURPHY ELEMENTS

Math 210C. A non-closed commutator subgroup

A method for construction of Lie group invariants

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Transcription:

Topics in Representation Theory: SU(n), Weyl hambers and the Diagram of a Group 1 Another Example: G = SU(n) Last time we began analyzing how the maximal torus T of G acts on the adjoint representation, defining the roots of G as the non-trivial irreducibles that occur in this representation. The analysis proceeds by complexifying the Lie algebra, after which the adjoint actions of all H t are diagonalizable, with eigenvalues the complex roots and eigenvectors the root spaces. In general we have the commutation relations [H, E αi ] = α i (H)E αi Here H t, the complex root is a complex linear map and α i : t E αi g is one of the root spaces. In the case G = SU(2), g = sl(2, ), we can take elements of the artan subalgebra t to be 2 by 2 diagonal matrices of the form ( ) λ 0 H λ = λσ 3 = 0 λ and the two root spaces consist of matrices with entries proportional to X + = 1 ( ) 0 1 2 (σ 1 + iσ 2 ) = 0 0 with root and α(h λ ) = 2λ X = 1 2 (σ 1 iσ 2 ) = ( ) 0 0 1 0 with root α. The theory of roots and root spaces is one part of representation theory where the SU(2) example is too trivial to be useful since here the rank is one, and there is only one root (and its conjugate). We need to begin looking at higher rank examples, and will begin with the case of G = SU(n), g = sl(n, ). Note that while some formulas are simpler for the case of G = U(n), g = gl(n, ), this is not a semi-simple group and one needs to analyze its normal U(1) subgroups 1

separately. For this case T can be chosen to be the diagonal matrices D with entries D jj = e iθj, e iθj = 1 j=1,n and the corresponding artan subalgebra consists of diagonal matrices H λ with entries n (H λ ) jj = λ j, λ j = 0 Here the subscript λ now refers to the entire set of n numbers λ i. The root spaces are labelled by pairs j, k, j k of integers from 1 to n and correspond to matrices proportional to the matrix E jk all of whose entries are 0 except for the j, k th which is 1. Since the complex roots are given by j=1 [H λ, E jk ] = (λ j λ k )E jk α jk (H λ ) = λ j λ k The Weyl group in this case is the group S n, acting on T by permuting the D jj. Note that roots come in pairs of opposite sign. Making a choice of one of each pair is a choice of which roots are positive. One could for example choose in this example positive roots to be the α jk, j < k but note that this choice is not invariant under the Weyl group. The Weyl group acts on the set of roots, but does not respect the decomposition into positive and negative roots. A specific example to continually keep in mind, one where we can easily draw things, is the case of G = SU(3). Here the rank is two, and G/T is a complex manifold of six real dimensions or three complex dimensions. There are a total of six roots α (H λ ) = λ 1 λ 2 α (H λ ) = λ 2 λ 3 α 13 (H λ ) = λ 1 λ 3 and their negatives. The three positive roots are not independent, they satisfy the relation α 13 = α + α We will draw these as vectors in a plane that can be identified with it t Wel ll see a little later that the Killing form gives a natural inner product on this space, but for now we ll avoid using this, just dealing with the parts of the theory of roots that don t actually need the inner product. 2

2 Weyl hambers and the Diagram of a Group Recall that we defined the Weyl group W (G, T ) to be N(T )/T, this is a group of automorphisms of T that come from conjugation by an element of G. We saw in our example that the Weyl group S n of SU(n) permutes its roots. In general the Weyl group acts on the set of roots since a root θ α is a homomorphism θ α : T GL(g) and an element w W (G, T ) corresponds to a homomorphism w : t T xtx 1 T for some x G. omposing these two maps gives a new root w(α). Elements t T for which the group N(t) = {g G : gtg 1 = t} has dimension greater than dim T are said to be singular, those with dimension equal to dim T are said to be regular. In our example of G = SU(n), the regular elements are those where all the diagonal elements in T are distinct, the singular ones are those where two or more diagonal elements are identical. To understand the structure of the set of singular points in T, for each root θ α define Definition 1. For each root θ α, there is a codimension one subgroup of T = ker(θ α ) = ker(θ α ) The point t is a singular points of T, since the root space g α generates a one-parameter subgroup of G, not in T, of elements that commute with t, so the the dimension of N(T ) is greater than the dimension of T. Note that the intersection of all the consists of elements that commute with all of G, the center Z(G) of G. The Stiefel diagram of a group is the set consisting of all exp 1 and will consist of infinite sets of parallel hyperplanes in t. If we pass to the Lie algebra (now α will be thought of as elements of t ) and just look at those that go through zero we can define Definition 2 (Diagram of G). The infinitesimal diagram or diagram of G consists of the hyperplanes Lie( ) = ker α t i.e. those elements v t such that α(v) = 0. 3

U α α13 α13 α α α 13 α Diagram for SU(3) The hyperplanes of the diagram divide t into finitely many convex regions Definition 3 (Weyl hambers). Given a choice of positive roots, a Weyl chamber is a set of the form {v t : ɛ i α i (v) > 0} for all positive roots α i and some choice of signs ɛ i = ±1. 2 1 U α13 3 6 4 5 Weyl hambers for SU(3) 4

The roots are not independent, we can express some in terms of others. A set of roots that form a basis are called simple roots Definition 4 (Simple Roots). A subset S of the set R of roots is called a system of simple roots if the roots in S are linearly independent and every root β R can be written as β = α S m α α with m α integers all 0 or 0. In the case of SU(3), a set of simple roots will have two elements. possible choice of the set S of simple roots is One S = {α, α } A choice of a set S of simple roots is equivalent to a choice of positive roots. Positive roots are those where all m α are positive, negative roots ones where all m α are negative. orresponding to each choice of S there is a distinguished Weyl chamber Definition 5. The fundamental Weyl chamber corresponding to a set S of simple roots is K(S) = {v t : α i (v) > 0} for all α i in S. Fundamental Weyl hamber α α Simple Roots and Fundamental Weyl hamber for G = SU(3) We will not go into much more detail about the general theory of the Weyl group and how it acts on the diagram of G, referring to extensive discussions in the texts [1],[2],[3]. but there are two basic facts that will be of importance. 1. The Weyl group acts simply transitively on the set possible choices of S. 2. The Weyl group is generated by reflections in the hyperplanes corresponding to simple roots in S. 5

References [1] Adams, J. Frank, Lectures on Lie Groups, University of hicago Press, 1969. [2] Bröcker, T. and tom Dieck, T.,Representations of ompact Lie Groups, Springer-Verlag, 1985. [3] Simon, B., Representations of Finite and ompact Groups,American Mathematical Society, 1996. 6