Earthquake Hazards in Washoe County

Similar documents
Earthquake Hazards in Douglas County

Earthquake Hazards in Henderson

Earthquake Faults, Historical Earthquakes, and Earthquake Preparedness. Craig depolo Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology

Foreshocks to Major Earthquakes In Nevada. Craig M. depolo Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology

Layers (Layers in italics indicate group layers.) MyHazards MyPlan* Floods and Drought Landslides - USGS

WESTERN STATES SEISMIC POLICY COUNCIL POLICY RECOMMENDATION Earthquake and Tsunami Planning Scenarios

Seismic Hazard Abatement Program

NEVADA EARTHQUAKE SAFETY COUNCIL c/o Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology (775) Ext 126. February 17, 2009

Mitigation Strategies for Earthquake Surface Rupture Hazard in the Basin and Range Province

Risk Identification using Hazus

M-8.1 EARTHQUAKE 87KM SW OF PIJIJIAPAN, MEXICO EXACT LOCATION: N W DEPTH: 69.7KM SEPTEMBER 7, 11:49 PST

M 7.1 EARTHQUAKE 5KM ENE OF RABOSO, MEXICO EXACT LOCATION: N W DEPTH: 51.0KM SEPTEMBER 19, 1:14 LOCAL TIME

PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 2010

HAZUS-MH: Earthquake Event Report

Downtown Anchorage Seismic Risk Assessment & Land Use Regulations to Mitigate Seismic Risk

Usually, only a couple of centuries of earthquake data is available, much shorter than the complete seismic cycle for most plate motions.

In the early morning hours of

9. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS

NPTEL Online - IIT Kanpur. Course Name Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Department IIT Kanpur

Finding Fault Geologic History from a Road Cut

NEVADA EARTHQUAKE SAFETY COUNCIL c/o Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology (775) Ext 126

RISK ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY PROFILE NATURAL HAZARDS COMMUNITY RISK PROFILES. Page 13 of 524

Updated MCE R & MCE G Ground Motions in 2015 NEHRP Provisions (& ASCE/SEI 7-16)

Interpretive Map Series 24

Resiliency Assessed by Comparing Scenarios

High Probability of Foreshock Occurrence and Significant Probability of Multiple Events Associated with Magnitude 6 Earthquakes in Nevada, U.S.A.

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 4: GPS strain analysis examples Student exercise

158 Reducing Earthquake Losses

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS (HIVA) Walla Walla County, Washington EARTHQUAKE

Lab 9: Satellite Geodesy (35 points)

FRIENDS OF THE EEL RIVER

Earthquakes.

New USGS Maps Identify Potential Ground- Shaking Hazards in 2017

Geophysics 189 Natural Hazards Homework 2 Earthquake Locations and Hazards Due February 15, 2005

Preliminary Earthquake Risk Management Strategy Plan of Eskisehir, Turkey by using GIS

Minutes of the Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee Tuesday, May 7, 2013, at 12:30 pm

PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT 11/07/2016

Hazard City Earthquake Damage Assessment Answers

LANDUSE APPLICATIONS OF EARTHQUAKE HAZARD MAPS CALIFORNIA EXPERIENCE

Before exploring the effects of the 1906 earthquake, watch the video on ground shaking and liquefaction at:

Interpretive Map Series 24

FOURTH GRADE HAZARDS 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance Report:

The L.A. Earthquake Sourcebook

Name Date Class. radiate in all directions, carrying some of the. of plate boundaries have different usual patterns of.

Basic Seismological Characterization for Platte County, Wyoming. James C. Case Wyoming State Geological Survey July, 2002 BACKGROUND

Borah Peak Earthquake HAZUS Scenario Project Executive Summary Idaho Bureau of Homeland Security Idaho Geological Survey Western States Seismic

Earthquakes and Earth s Interior

4.5 GEOLOGY, SOILS AND SEISMICITY

STRESS IN THE SYSTEM? INSIGHTS INTO MODELLING IN THE WAKE OF TOHOKU

APPENDIX D REGION 5 ALL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN EDITION PIERCE COUNTY OVERVIEW. Inherent Errors

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Homework Assignment II. Seismological Exercises Fall 2014

4.1 Hazard Identification: Natural Hazards

Baldwin County, Alabama

Special Report: California Earthquake Preparedness and Vulnerabilities

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

4.6 GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS

Portland Water Bureau. Preparing Portland s Water Supply for The Big One. July 11, Tim Collins, P.E., G.E.

Homework Assignment II. Seismological Exercises Spring 2018

Estimation of Short Term Shelter Needs FEMA Earthquake HAZUS Model

Seth J. Wittke Wyoming State Geological Survey

Cascadia megathrust earthquakes: reducing risk through science, engineering, and planning

The Coming Bay Area Earthquake Update


M-6.2 EARTHQUAKE NORCIA, ITALY AUGUST 24, 01:36:33 UTC

Earthquakes. Chapter Test A. Multiple Choice. Write the letter of the correct answer on the line at the left.

SHAKING AND GROUND FAILURE-INDUCED DAMAGE TO BUILDINGS BY THE 2010 AND 2011 CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKES AND ITS LESSONS

RISK OF PRINCIPAL DISASTERS IN INDIA AND IMPACTS OF DISASTERS ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Disaster Risk Management in India. Kamal Kishore New Delhi, 27 October 2016

EARTHQUAKES IN NEVADA

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

Geologic Hazards. Geologic Setting

COMPREHENSIVE GIS-BASED SOLUTION FOR ROAD BLOCKAGE DUE TO SEISMIC BUILDING COLLAPSE IN TEHRAN

Preview Mode: ON Earthquake Risk in Stable, Intraplate Regions: the Case. of Perth, Australia. Historical Seismicity in the Perth Region

Geothermal Systems: Geologic Origins of a Vast Energy Resource

Earthquakes. These icons indicate that teacher s notes or useful web addresses are available in the Notes Page.

Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon

Separating Tectonic, Magmatic, Hydrological, and Landslide Signals in GPS Measurements near Lake Tahoe, Nevada-California

Earth s Tectonic Plates

Module 2, Investigation 1: Earthquake Hazards

How to communicate Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake hazards

September 28, 2004 Parkfield Earthquake

Validation of Earthquake Simulations and Their Effects on Tall Buildings Considering Spectral Shape and Duration

CITY OF RIVERSIDE USING HAZUS TO CREATE A EARTHQUAKE PLANNING GUIDE FOR A UNIFIED FIELD RESPONSE

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Earthquake Risk in Canada and the National Building Code

HAZUS-MH: A Predictable Hurricane Risk Assessment Tool for the City of Houston and Harris County

What s Shaking in the Barnett Shale? STEP Dallas, August 11, 2015

The Magnitude 7.2 Earthquake from the West Valley Fault: Implications for Metro Manila and Nearby Provinces

Washington State K 12 Facilities Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program Final Mitigation Plan

Overview. Tools of the Trade. USGS Decision-Making Tools for Pre-Earthquake Mitigation and Post-Earthquake Response

Performing seismic scenarios in the Luchon-Val d Aran area, Central Pyrenees

Earthquakes. Earthquakes

Low-Latency Earthquake Displacement Fields for Tsunami Early Warning and Rapid Response Support

2014 San Gabriel Valley Water Forum. October 2, 2014

Summary Minutes Nevada Earthquake Safety Council 24 August 2001

Transcription:

Earthquake Hazards in Washoe County Craig M. depolo Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee August 13, 2013

Earthquake Truths The consequences of damaging earthquakes to unprepared communities are unacceptable. We know how to plan for, prepare for, and mitigate against disastrous earthquake effects. We know how to minimize injuries and property loss.

Earthquake Hazard Earthquakes Earthquake faults (Quaternary faults) Crustal movement based on geodesy

Periods of Damaging Earthquakes in Washoe County 1857 1869 [1957, 1860, 1868, 1869(2)] 1914 1915 [1914(2), 1915] 1948 1954 [1948, 1953, 1954] 2008?

Preparing for earthquakes in Nevada will likely have a more than one time benefit.

1915 Pleasant Valley Earthquake; M 7.3 Modified Mercalli Intensity Map Modified from Stover and Coffman, 1993

Kreemer et al. (2012)

West of the San Andreas fault in California, the Pacific Plate is moving northwest relative to the North American Plate. Kreemer et al. (2012)

NBMG Open-File Report 09-8, Estimated Losses from Earthquakes near Nevada Communities, demonstrates that the consequences of earthquakes can be huge in Nevada, particularly if individuals are not prepared. HAZUS scenarios for magnitude 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 earthquakes near 38 communities in Nevada. Large uncertainties in this modeling order-ofmagnitude estimates. Use for preparedness, response, and recovery plans and scenarios

2008 Mw 6.0 Wells Earthquake

HAZUS estimates for total economic loss from a magnitude 6.0 earthquake and probability of an earthquake of M 6 occurring within 50 years and within 31 mi (50 km) of the community. Estimated Probability Community Total Economic Loss M6 in 50 yrs w/in 31 mi Las Vegas $7.2 billion 12% Reno $1.9 billion 67% Sparks $1.8 billion 67% Carson City $650 million 70% Incline Village $510 million 60-70% Elko $160 million 10-15% Fallon $110 million 35% Gerlach $39 million 10-15% Wells $30 million 12% Total economic loss is from HAZUS. Probabilities are from the USGS at http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/eqprob/2002/index.php.

Wells 12% chance M6 earthquake occurred Feb. 21, 2008

Earthquake faults occur throughout Nevada, and potential losses from earthquakes are high for many communities. A. Be prepared to respond. B. Mitigate structural risks, largely through building codes and avoiding faults and areas of liquefaction. C. Mitigate nonstructural risks.

Unreinforced Masonry Buildings

Unreinforced masonry building (URM) that collapsed during the Wells earthquake on 21 February 2008 View from back, 20 May 2009 View from front, 20 May 2009

Definition of potential unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings in Nevada: buildings listed by County Assessors or State Public Works as built before 1974 with brick, stone, or block masonry structure. Caution: This is a preliminary study based on data provided by county assessors and the State of Nevada. We know there are errors in the database: URMs missed - not recorded as masonry structures URMs missed ones on federal or Indian lands URMs counted due to wrong building type in the database Wrong locations due to poor address coding Misidentifications due to lack of construction date Buildings that may have been seismically retrofitted Buildings that have been removed. Recommendation 1 (draft): Jurisdictions (cities, counties, state) should use this County Assessors data to follow up with in-thefield inspections and checks of building plans. Individuals should determine if their buildings are URMs.

Potential URMs in Nevada 7,354 Residential 16,145 Commercial & Public (city and county) 98 State-owned 23,597 TOTAL* * The total does not include buildings owned by the federal government. NBMG Report 54 (2012)

Potential URMs Residential Commercial & Public State-owned

Potential URMs in Washoe County 3,322 Residential 2,445 Commercial & Public (city and county) 21 State-owned 5,788 TOTAL* * The total does not include buildings owned by the federal government. NBMG Report 54 (2012)

Nonstructural damage often can be easily prevented.

Great Nevada ShakeOut

Thank you! And thanks to Jon Price, Gary Johnson, Christine Ballard, Heather Armeno, Irene Seeley, Linda D. Goar, and Jordan T. Hastings for their work on the open-file reports (OF 09-8 and 09-9), which are available as online documents at www.nbmg.unr.edu. From there, go to online documents at http://www.nbmg.unr.edu/dox/dox.htm, then scroll down to OF 09-8 or 09-9. Link to the fault map from OF 09-9.