Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion & Spatial Planning Stakeholder Workshop - Project Update. 13 th December 2012 San Sebastián, Basque Country

Similar documents
Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion and Spatial Planning in Preparing Territorial Development Strategies

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

The ESPON Programme. Goals Main Results Future

Implementation of the ESPON 2020 cooperation program. 16 January 2017 Anneloes van Noordt

Land Use in the context of sustainable, smart and inclusive growth

Alps Results from the ESPON Project. Common spatial perspectives for the Alpine area. Towards a common vision

16540/14 EE/cm 1 DG E 1A

KUNMING FORUM ON UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CITIES OF THE FUTURE: SMART, RESILIENT

ESPON evidence on European cities and metropolitan areas

Launch of the ESPON 2013 Programme. European observation network on territorial development and cohesion

The European territory: Strategic developmentd

The National Spatial Strategy

European spatial policy and regionalised approaches

Mediterranean Sea and Territorial Development, Opportunities and Risks

Poland, European Territory, ESPON Programme Warsaw, 2 July 2007 STRATEGY OF THE ESPON 2013 PROGRAMME

Use and demand of regions and cities

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /14 CULT 68

Economic and Social Council

5 Use and debate ESPON results

Tackling urban sprawl: towards a compact model of cities? David Ludlow University of the West of England (UWE) 19 June 2014

THE ROLE OF REGIONAL SPATIAL PLANNING IN SUPPORTING LONG-TERM ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NORTHERN IRELAND

PURR: POTENTIAL OF RURAL REGIONS UK ESPON WORKSHOP Newcastle 23 rd November Neil Adams

Third Cohesion report February 2004

Jordan's Strategic Research Agenda in cultural heritage

ESPON support for Targeted Analyses Ilona Raugze Director

UN-GGIM: Strengthening Geospatial Capability

Please indicate which activities you foresee at which point in time to allow for the dissemination of your project s results (maximum 5 pages).

Towards a City Model for Heritage-Led Regeneration and Tourism Development

15 March 2010 Re: Draft Native Vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority Area GIS layers and explanatory reports

No 4 February ESPON: A New and Practical European Research Agenda for Territorial Planning and Development. Cliff Hague Brendan Bartley

Governance and Functional Urban Areas CEMAT Conference

TERRITORIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: AN APPROACH TO IMPROVE THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL INTEGRATION OF EU POLICIES

Concept note. High-Level Seminar: Accelerating Sustainable Energy for All in Landlocked Developing Countries through Innovative Partnerships

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY ON BIOSPHERE RESERVES

The ESPON Programme and the use of spatial data on the European level

ESPON Factsheet. Italy Austria

Strengthening the cooperation in the region: Carpathian, Tisa,, Danube and Black Sea areas

CHAPTER 4 HIGH LEVEL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF) Page 95

Outline National legislative & policy context Regional history with ESSIM ESSIM Evaluation Phase Government Integration via RCCOM Regional ICOM Framew

Low Density Areas : Places of Opportunity. Enrique Garcilazo, OECD Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development

Highlands and Islands European Partnership Response to the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion

FINDINGS OF THE ARCTIC METEOROLOGY SUMMIT

Spatial Planning and Territorial Development at the Regional Level

International Guidelines on Access to Basic Services for All

6 th GLOBAL SUMMIT ON URBAN TOURISM 4 6 December 2017, Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

KITCASP Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion and Spatial Planning

Improvements for Kosovo's spatial planning system / [presentation given in May 2011]

Economic and Social Council

a national geological survey perspective François ROBIDA BRGM (French Geological Survey)

TERRITORIAL COHESION MEASUREMENT AT THE REGIONAL SCALE. A METHODOLOGICAL PROPOSAL AND APPLICATION IN ANDALUSIA

Integrated Strategies in regional development

TOWARDS STRATEGIC SPATIAL PLANNING IN JAMAICA: THE NATIONAL SPATIAL PLAN

Sustainable Development Goal 11 and the New Urban Agenda: can planning deliver? Vanessa Watson University of Cape Town 2016

ACTION PLAN FOR WORLD HERITAGE IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ( )

Urban Climate Resilience

ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. Anneloes van Noordt MC-member Belgium

KENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS Workshop on

RURAL-URBAN PARTNERSHIPS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

BOOK REVIEWS. ESPON Atlas: Territorial Dimensions of the Europe 2020 Strategy. ESPON 2013 Programme, Luxembourg, 2013, 66 p. ISBN

Achieving the Vision Geo-statistical integration addressing South Africa s Developmental Agenda. geospatial + statistics. The Data Revolution

THE ROLE OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INTERREG III B BALTCOAST PROJECT

Presentation by Thangavel Palanivel Senior Strategic Advisor and Chief Economist UNDP Regional Bureau for Asia-Pacific

Local Development Pilot Project: Island of Cres. Ranka Saračević Würth, Ministry of Culture, Republic of Croatia

National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) Policy Coordination and Advisory Service

Shetland Islands Council

Identification of maritime spatial planning best practices in the Baltic Sea Region and other EU maritime regions

SPIMA Spatial dynamics and strategic planning in metropolitan areas

Disaster Management & Recovery Framework: The Surveyors Response

The National Policy Strategy for Infrastructure and Spatial Planning CODE24 CONFERENCE. Emiel Reiding

Statement of Mr. Sandagdorj Erdenebileg, Chief, Policy Development, Coordination, Monitoring and Reporting Service, UN-OHRLLS.

Conference on Urban Development Strategies in the Mediterranean Barcelona, March 14-15, 2011

SPATIAL STRATEGIES ON THE ISLAND OF IRELAND: FRAMEWORK FOR COLLABORATION

Urbanization and Sustainable Development of Cities: A Ready Engine to Promote Economic Growth and Cooperation

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Possibilities for applying ES assessment results in spatial planning in Latvia

Spatially Enabled Society

Applying GIS to Coastal Management in Cork Harbour: the Corepoint experience

What s the problem? A Modern Odyssey in Search of Relevance. The search for relevance. Some current drivers for new services. Some Major Applications

Geographic Information Infrastructure and Policy Framework for Sustainable Mountain Development in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas

Smart City Governance for effective urban governance. David Ludlow Assoc. Professor European Smart Cities University of the West of England, Bristol

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Netherlands

Advancing Geoscientific Capability. Geological Survey of Finland

Background Document: Report of the Regional Committee of United Nations Global Geospatial Information Management for Asia and the Pacific

The view of Europaforum Northern Sweden concerning the future of EU cohesion policy

MR. George ALEXAKIS, parallel session 3. "Mediterranean Sea Region. laying the conditions. for sustainable growth and jobs"

Tourism. April State Planning Policy state interest guideline. Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning

Contract title: Technical assistance for multi-annual programming of future cross border cooperation programme in the Romania-Serbia cooperation area

Work Packages. RECROS Project development workshop. Prague, 30 th April 2015

Seabed knowledge In support of UN SDGs

PART A Project summary

NSPA Forum. Presentation of the Study findings Dr Benito Giordano. Sundsvall, 19th April 2012

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

The UN-GGIM: Europe core data initiative to encourage Geographic information supporting Sustainable Development Goals Dominique Laurent, France

EWARD. Details for application. Overview of key fields and questions (Ph.D. topics and positions) of EWARD

TranSMEC Transnational Support Method for European Cooperation

Resource Stewards and Users in the New Arctic. Dr. Joan Nymand Larsen Stefansson Arctic Institute Akureyri, Iceland

2018/1 The integration of statistical and geospatial information. The Regional Committee of UN-GGIM: Americas:

Experience and perspectives of using EU funds and other funding for the implementation of district renovation projects

OUR COASTAL FUTURES. A Strategy for the Sustainable Development of the World s Coasts.

Territorial Intelligence and Innovation for the Socio-Ecological Transition

Transcription:

Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion & Spatial Planning Stakeholder Workshop - Project Update 13 th December 2012 San Sebastián, Basque Country

Key Aims Explore the use of territorial data in developing and monitoring national spatial strategies and other territorial development policies. Identify the data used and any gaps or limitations in the data available in the stakeholder countries. Examine the extent to which ESPON data has informed the strategies examined and develop guidelines on the use of indicators and ESPON data in territorial policy development at the national level. Identify a core set of key indicators of territorial cohesion, competitiveness and sustainable development to inform spatial planning at the national level, drawing on ESPON research and datasets available in the stakeholder countries. Consider how the capacity for spatial analysis can be strengthened and harmonised at the national level, how national analytical experience and expertise can help to inform and take forward the EU Territorial Agenda, and the implications for future ESPON research

Key Questions What are good practices on the use of data to inform territorial policy development? How can the stakeholders make better use of ESPON data in developing their spatial policies? What data is needed for developing reliable key indicators? What are the key indicators for measuring territorial cohesion, competitiveness and sustainable development? How can indicators for different countries be compared? How can the key indicators most effectively inform spatial policy? To what extent are these indicators GIS-based and would this enhance their comparability and relevance? How can the key indicators be regularly updated and how is this to be managed?

Stakeholder Driven Approach Responds to a demand of policy makers and practitioners, expressed during the ESPON 2006 Programme, for user and demand driven research projects. Introducing a new approach to the generation of project ideas as well as to the implementation of projects by emphasising operational use of the results of the analyses in practice. Carried through in close cooperation and partnership between stakeholders, a group of experts and the ESPON Programme Focusing on integrated analyses of certain territorial contexts, regional case studies, experiments and methodological support to territorial planning and visions.

Method

Method

Spatial Planning & Territorial Cohesion INTERCO INTERREG A Europe 2020 Economic performance Socio-economic territorial Smart growth and competitiveness balance Environmental qualities Environmental sustainability Sustainable growth (for a resource efficient, greener and more competitive economy) Social inclusion and quality of life Innovative territories Access to services, markets and jobs Territorial cooperation and governance Polycentric territorial development Socio-economic territorial balance Balanced and polycentric urban system Territorial cooperation and governance Balanced and polycentric urban system Inclusive growth (a high-employment economy delivering economic, social and territorial cohesion) Smart growth Smart and inclusive growth Economic governance Smart and inclusive growth

Spatial Planning & Territorial Cohesion

Spatial Planning & Territorial Cohesion Ireland Scotland Iceland Latvia Basque Country Economic recovery and employment Economic recovery, growth and Recovery from economic crisis Economic breakthrough Recovery from the crisis within much reduced budgetary transition to a low carbon and recovery from resources economy economic crisis Need to deliver much greater efficiencies through enhanced settlement-infrastructure/services alignment More balanced regional development Environmental challenges: reducing greenhouse gas emissions, habitat protection and water quality management Need for a more rational and evidence based spatial planning system National development infrastructure Realising potential of different areas according to specific territorial assets Meeting climate change targets, environmental sustainability, natural resource management and realising renewable energy potential Balanced distribution settlement Development of the highland interior Economic, social and territorial disparities Economic and human dimension of sustainability Environmental sustainability Integrate strategic planning from various government institutes/companies An aspirational agenda for an independent Scotland Importance of place and quality of life Managing demographic change Demographic dynamics (rapid depopulation, social cohesion...) Sustainable planning of coasts and the ocean Integration between settlements and infrastructure of the territory Regional development Protection of the biodiversity Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions Sustainability Regeneration Innovation

Progress to Date Inception Report Elaboration of methodological approach [6 th of June 2012] Interim Report Data and Information Gathering 1. The detailed territorial profiles of the case study territories aimed at identifying the key territorial development challenges and existing spatial monitoring arrangements; 2. The results of consultation workshops with stakeholders in relation to the key drivers and development priorities in each region and their requirements for appropriate national territorial monitoring indicators; 3. Review of existing ESPON Research 4. Preliminary set of common identified priority themes identified by the TPG based on policy objectives and development priorities for the territories and stakeholder consultations to which the indicators will be grouped and linked; and 5. A preliminary inventory of domestic indicator and data sets in each stakeholder territory.

Next Steps Filtering of indicators and data sets based on the agreed themes and through the application of indicator selection criteria as established in both the Inception and the Interim Reports to identify a core set of key indicators; Identification of ESPON and non-espon datasets in each case study region to populate the indicators. This will include will include identification of any gaps or limitations in the data available in the stakeholder countries and recommendations for future data collection; Fine-tuning of indicators to ensure they are compatible, comparable and understood in diverse policy contexts. This will include presentation of a draft set of indicators to key stakeholders in each of the stakeholder territories for further comment and amendment; Preparation of the draft Guidelines and Recommendations for National Stakeholders and Recommendations for ESPON reports. Again these draft reports will be presented to the stakeholders in each territory for critical comment and feedback; Development of a centralised dashboard system (as per the ESPON TPM project) for collating and presenting spatial data and indicators from each of the case studies; Preparation of graphics illustrating the performance of selected indicators for each of the case studies. Once data have been gathered, TPM recommendations will be applied and used within the technology available within NIRSA to develop a data visualisation tool.

Filtering Process Key Principles Bottom Up & Stakeholder Driven Builds on Existing ESPON Research Spatial Planning Focussed Measurable Explanatory Power (Outcome) Practical Availability (Datasets) Relevance Ease of understanding

Criteria for Indicator Selection Does the indicator address the case studies policy objectives and development priorities (i.e. overall priority themes)? Does the indicator enable assessing the performance and dynamics of balanced territorial development (i.e. can it be mapped to illustrate spatial patterns)? Is the indicator regularly measured (i.e. are there reliable and timely datasets available or monitoring arrangements in place)? Does the indicator effectively provide information sensitive to change to timely aid decision-making processes? Is the indicator well-understood by planners and decision-makers (i.e. can it communicate the results in a concise and accessible manner)?

Identification of Themes Themes 1: Economic Competitiveness & Resilience: economic activity, employment, enable, adaptability, diversification, innovation, collaboration, agglomerations of scale. Theme 2: Managed Spatial Development: Balanced development, settlement infrastructure alignment, effective, coherent, polycentricity, capacity and assets Theme 3: Social Cohesion & Quality of Life: equity, people, well-being, choice, access, green infrastructure Theme 4: Environmental Resource Management: climate change, adaption, low-carbon, landscape protection, coastal management, sustainability, biodiversity, habitats, air quality, water management Outliers: Polycentrism, Governance and Territorial Cooperation

More information Thank you for your attention Please visit http://www.nuim.ie/nirsa/espon/kitcasp/ gavin.daly@nuim.ie; ainhoa.gonzalez@nuim.ie