English version Version Française Deutsche Fassung

Similar documents
English version Version Française Deutsche Fassung

English version Version Française Deutsche Fassung. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-4: General actions - Wind actions

EN 1990:2002/A1:2005/AC

NORMA UNI EN (agosto 2005) Eurocodice 3 Progettazione delle strutture di acciaio Parte 1-8: Progettazione dei collegamenti.

Eurokodas 1. Poveikiai konstrukcijoms. 1-4 dalis. Bendrieji poveikiai. V jo poveikiai

Irish Standard I.S. EN :2005

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

Geotechnical Parameters for Retaining Wall Design

D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.

Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

Active Earth Pressure on Retaining Wall Rotating About Top

Landslide stability analysis using the sliding block method

file:///d /suhasini/suha/office/html2pdf/ _editable/slides/module%202/lecture%206/6.1/1.html[3/9/2012 4:09:25 PM]

Session 3. Calculation Models. EQU, UPL and HYD. Design of Pile Foundations

Chapter (4) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases)

FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT V

EARTH PRESSURES ON RETAINING STRUCTURES

This document is a preview generated by EVS

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

LIVING REINFORCED SOIL - AN ECOLOGICAL METHOD TO STABILISE SLOPES

Session 4. Risk and Reliability. Design of Retaining Structures. Slopes, Overall Stability and Embankments. (Blarney Castle)

Slope stability software for soft soil engineering. D-Geo Stability. Verification Report

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Erratum. Chapter 4 - Earth and water pressure 26. Chapter Area loads. q a. c+d ϕ'/2. Piling Handbook, 9th edition (2016)

Computational limit state analysis of reinforced concrete structures

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

Worked examples. Dr. Bernd Schuppener German Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute, Karlsruhe Past Chairman of CEN TC250/SC 7

Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Chapter 12: Lateral Earth Pressure

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

This document is a preview generated by EVS

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Soil Mechanics Prof. B.V.S. Viswanathan Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture 51 Earth Pressure Theories II

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Chapter (7) Lateral Earth Pressure

30/03/2011. Eurocode 7 Today and Tomorrow. Ground structures t Slope and Retaining wall design in the Netherlands. Contents

Earth Pressure Theory

Project: Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free Earth Support In accordance Eurocode 7.

GEO E1050 Finite Element Method Mohr-Coulomb and other constitutive models. Wojciech Sołowski

Back Analysis of the Lower San Fernando Dam Slide Using a Multi-block Model

Soil strength. the strength depends on the applied stress. water pressures are required

Laboratory Testing Total & Effective Stress Analysis

Foundations with D f equal to 3 to 4 times the width may be defined as shallow foundations. TWO MAIN CHARACTERISTICS ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

This document is a preview generated by EVS

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Safety Concepts and Calibration of Partial Factors in European and North American Codes of Practice

DEUTSCHE NORM DIN EN ISO 2439


Vägbelysning Del 3: Beräkning av prestanda. Road lighting Part 3: Calculation of performance

UNIT V. The active earth pressure occurs when the wall moves away from the earth and reduces pressure.

Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

SOIL MECHANICS: palgrave. Principles and Practice. Graham Barnes. macmiiian THIRD EDITION

KUNSTSTOFFDÜBEL ALS MEHRFACHBEFESTIGUNG VON NICHTTRAGENDEN SYSTEMEN ZUR VERANKERUNG IM BETON UND MAUERWERK

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

Objectives. In this section you will learn the following. Development of Bearing Capacity Theory. Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory

PRINCIPLES OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

This document is a preview generated by EVS

SHEAR STRENGTH I YULVI ZAIKA

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Trench stability in cohesive soil

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr. N. K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Introduction to Soil Mechanics

Pullout Tests of Geogrids Embedded in Non-cohesive Soil

Foundation Analysis LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

Seminar Worked examples on Bridge Design with Eurocodes

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE AND RETAINING STRUCTURES

SVENSK STANDARD SS-EN :2005. Konststen Provningsmetoder Del 6: Bestämning av beständighet mot plötslig temperaturförändring (termisk chock)

RAMWALL DESIGN METHODOLOGY

R.SUNDARAVADIVELU Professor IIT Madras,Chennai - 36.

PLANES OF WEAKNESS IN ROCKS, ROCK FRCTURES AND FRACTURED ROCK. Contents

Compute the lateral force per linear foot with sloping backfill and inclined wall. Use Equation No. 51, page 93. Press ENTER.

Verification Manual. of GEO5 Gravity Wall program. Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Verze: 1.0-en Fine Ltd.

Shear at the interface between concrete cast

The Concepts of Eurocode 7 for Harmonised Geotechnical Design in Europe

Interslice force functions for computing active and passive earth force

Cavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics

Slope Stability Theory

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

In depth study of lateral earth pressure

Objectives. In this section you will learn the following. Rankine s theory. Coulomb s theory. Method of horizontal slices given by Wang (2000)

Observational Methods and

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

FINAL DRAFT pren 1990

Theory of Shear Strength

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

Towards Efficient Finite Element Model Review Dr. Richard Witasse, Plaxis bv (based on the original presentation of Dr.

Appraisal of Soil Nailing Design

(Refer Slide Time: 04:21 min)

(Refer Slide Time: 01:15)

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.

Shear strength. Common cases of shearing In practice, the state of stress in the ground will be complex. Common cases of shearing Strength

9.13 Fixed Earth-Support Method for Penetration into Sandy Soil

Transcription:

EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM EN 1997-1:2004/AC February 2009 Février 2009 Februar 2009 ICS 93.020; 91.010.30 English version Version Française Deutsche Fassung Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules Eurocode 7: Calcul géotechnique - Partie 1: Règles générales Eurocode 7 - Entwurf, Berechnung und Bemessung in der Geotechnik - Teil 1: Allgemeine Regeln This corrigendum becomes effective on 18 February 2009 for incorporation in the three official language versions of the EN. Ce corrigendum prendra effet le 18 février 2009 pour incorporation dans les trois versions linguistiques officielles de la EN. Die Berichtigung tritt am 18.Februar 2009 zur Einarbeitung in die drei offiziellen Sprachfassungen der EN in Kraft. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2009 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Tous droits d'exploitation sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit réservés dans le monde entier aux membres nationaux du CEN. Alle Rechte der Verwertung, gleich in welcher Form und in welchem Verfahren, sind weltweit den nationalen Mitgliedern von CEN vorbehalten. Ref. No.:EN 1997-1:2004/AC:2009 D/E/F

1 Modification to Foreword Last subpart "National Annex for EN 1997-1", last paragraph including the list of national choice, add between "2.4.7.1(3)" and "2.4.7.2(2)P": "2.4.7.1(4), 2.4.7.1(5), 2.4.7.1(6)" and between "8.6(4)" and "11.5.1(1)P": "10.2 (3)". 2 Modification to Subclause 1.1.2 Part (3), 1 st indent, replace: "partial safety factor" with "partial factor". 3 Modifications to Subclause 1.6 Part "Latin letters": Read the explanation of the following symbols as follows: "A effective base area (A = B L )" "q b;k characteristic value of unit base resistance" "q s;i;k characteristic value of unit shaft resistance in stratum i". Replace as symbol for "width of a foundation": "b" with "B". Replace in the explanation of "C d ": effect of an action with relevant serviceability criterion. Replace as symbol for "foundation length": "l" with "L". Insert the following symbol in the list after "q s;r;k ": "q u unconfined compressive strength". Part "Greek letters": Read the explanation of the following symbols as follows: "γ R;e partial factor for passive earth resistance" "γ Q;dst partial factor for a variable destabilising action" "γ Q;stb partial factor for a variable stabilising action". 4 Modification to Subclause 2.1 Part (17), replace: soil with ground. 2

5 Modification to Subclause 2.4.2 Part (4), 3rd dash, delete: and ground-water pressure. 6 Modifications to Subclause 2.4.7.1 Part (4), add the following note: NOTE The values of partial factors may be set by the National Annex. Part (5), add the following note: NOTE The values of partial factors may be set by the National Annex. Part (6), add the following note: NOTE The values of model factors may be set by the National Annex. 7 Modification to Subclause 6.5.3 Part (11)P, replace in formulas (6.4a) and (6.4b): "A c " with "A ". 8 Modification to Subclause 7.1 Part (3)P, delete the "NOTE" and add: " EN 14199:2005, for micropiles". 9 Modification to Subclause 7.6.2.1 Part (13), 2nd dash, replace: cross-sectional with gross cross-sectional. 10 Modification to Subclause 7.6.3.3 Part (6), "NOTE", replace: "from" with "in". 11 Modifications to Subclause 7.6.4.2 Part (1)P, replace: "partial safety factors" with "partial factors". Part (4), replace: "assessed on" with "assessed on the basis of. 12 Modifications to Subclause 7.8 Part (4)P, replace: very weak with extremely low strength fine. Part (5), replace: representative, undrained with characteristic. 3

13 Modification to Subclause 7.9 Part (4), add after "EN 12699:2000,": "EN 14199:2005,"; and delete the final "NOTE". 14 Modifications to Subclause 8.1.1 Part (3): Replace: "(3)" with "(3)P". Replace the sentence: "This Section should not be applied to soil nails." with the following: This Section does not apply to soil nails." 15 Modification to Subclause 8.1.2 "8.2.1.7 Tendon free length", renumber "8.2.1.7" into "8.1.2.7". 16 Modification to Subclause 8.8 Part (1)P, replace: It shall be specified in the design that all with All. 17 Modification to Subclause 9.3.1.5 Part (1)P, delete: "forces" after ice. 18 Modification to Subclause 9.3.2.2 Part (3), replace: execution period with "design situation. 19 Modification to Subclause 9.5.3 Part (2), replace: high angles of internal friction with high angles of shearing resistance. 20 Modifications to Subclause 9.6 Part (3)P: Replace: "(3)P" with "(3)". Replace the two occurrences of: shall with should normally. 4

21 Modification to Subclause 9.7.5 Part (5)P, replace: Section 6 with Section 7. 22 Modifications to Subclause 9.8.1 Delete full text of parts (2)P and (3)P. Renumber part (4) into (2) and part (5) into (3). In paragraph (3) (renumbered), replace: may with need. 23 Modifications to Subclause 10.2 Part (2)P: Insert: "while" between ground layers, and the design resistance. Part (3): Replace the entire 1 st paragraph with the following: If allowed by the National Annex, resistance to uplift by friction or anchor forces may also be treated as a stabilising permanent vertical action (G stb;d ). NOTE The values of the partial factors may be set by the National Annex. Figures 10.1 a) to e), key element 1, replace four times: (ground)-water table with groundwater table, Replace Figures 10.1 c), 10.1 d) and 10.1 e) with the following new Figures 10.1 c), 10.1 d) and 10.1 e): Figure 10.1 c) 5

Figure 10.1 d) Figure 10.1 e) Figure 10.1 c), add the key element: 10 groundwater level before the excavation. Figures 10.1 c) and d), add the key element: 11 groundwater level in the excavation. In Figure 10.1 c), add the key element: 12 piezometric level at the base of the clay layer. In Figure 10.1 d), delete the key element: 6 sand. 24 Modification to Subclause 10.3 Figure 10.2, replace key element 1: "excavation level (left); water table (right)" with excavation level (left); free-water level (right). 6

25 Modification to Subclause 10.4 Part (5)P, replace the current paragraph with: If the filter criteria are not satisfied, it shall be verified that the design value of the hydraulic gradient is well below the critical hydraulic gradient at which soil particles begin to move. 26 Modifications to Subclause 10.5 Part (1)P: Figure 10.3, replace key element 1: "free water table" with free-water level. "NOTE", 2nd dash, delete underlining of the. 27 Modifications to Subclause 11.5.1 Part (10), replace the 2nd sentence with: If a method of slices is used and horizontal equilibrium is not checked, the inter-slices forces should be assumed to be horizontal. Part (11)P, delete the final "NOTE". 28 Modification to Subclause A.5 Part (1)P, NOTE, replace: EN 1990:2002 with this standard. 29 Modifications to Subclause B.2 Part (4): Replace: Equation (2.6) includes with Equations (2.6a) and (2.6b) include. Part (5):, 2nd paragraph, replace: equation (2.6) with equations (2.6a) and (2.6b). 5 th paragraph, replace: equation (2.6) reduces to with equation (2.6a) applies. Part (6): 2 nd paragraph replace: equation (2.6) reduces to: with equations (2.6a) and (2.6b) reduce to:. Part (7): Replace: equation (2.6) remains: with equations (2.6a) and (2.6b) remain:. 30 Modifications to Subclause B.3 Part (1): 1 st line, replace: equation (2.7) with equation (2.7c). 7

Equation (B.5.2), replace: equation (2.7) with equation (2.7c). Part (2): Replace: equation (2.7) with equations (2.7a), (2.7b) and (2.7c). Part (5): 2nd paragraph, replace: equation (2.7) with equation (2.7c). 31 Modification to Subclause F.2 Equation (F.1), replace: "b" with "B". 32 Modification to Annex C Replace the full Annex C with the following new Annex C: 8

Annex C (informative) Sample procedures to determine earth pressures C.1 Limit values of earth pressure (1) The limit values of earth pressure on a vertical wall, caused by soil of weight density (γ), uniform vertical surface load (q), angle of shearing resistance (ϕ) and cohesion (c) should be calculated as follows: active limit state: σ a (z) = K a [ γdz + q u ] + u c K ac (C.1) where the integration is taken from ground surface to depth z K ac = 2 [K a (1+a/c)], limited to 2,56 K a passive limit state: σ p (z) = K p [ γdz +q u ] + u + ck pc (C.2) where the integration is taken from ground surface to depth z where: K pc = 2 [K p (1+a/c)], limited to 2,56 K p a c K a K p q z β δ γ σ a (z) σ p (z) is the adhesion (between ground and wall) is the cohesion is the coefficient of effective horizontal active earth pressure is the coefficient of effective horizontal passive earth pressure is the vertical surface load is the distance down the face of the wall is the slope angle of the ground behind the wall (upward positive) is the angle of shearing resistance between ground and wall is the total weight density of retained ground is the total stress normal to the wall at depth z (active limit state) is the total stress normal to the wall at depth z (passive limit state) (2) For drained soil, K a and K p are functions of angle of shearing resistance ϕ, and c = c, the effective cohesion. For undrained soil, K a = K p = 1 and c = c u, the undrained shear strength. 9

(3) Values of the effective earth pressure coefficients may be taken from Figures C.1.1 to C.1.4 for K a and C.2.1 to C.2.4 for K p. (4) Alternatively, the analytical procedure described in C.2 may be used. (5) In layered soils, the coefficients K should normally be determined by the shear strength parameters at depth z only, independent of the values at other depths. Figure C.1.1 Coefficients K a of effective active earth pressure (horizontal component): with horizontal retained surface (β = 0) 10

Figure C.1.2 Coefficients K a of effective active earth pressure (horizontal component): with inclined retained surface (δ/ϕ = 0 and δ = 0) 11

Figure C.1.3 Coefficients K a of effective active earth pressure (horizontal component): with inclined retained surface (δ/ϕ = 0,66) 12

Figure C.1.4 Coefficients K a of effective active earth pressure (horizontal component): with inclined retained surface (δ/ϕ = 1) 13

Figure C.2.1 Coefficients K p of effective passive earth pressure (horizontal component): with horizontal retained surface (β = 0) 14

Figure C.2.2 Coefficients K p of effective passive earth pressure (horizontal component): with inclined retained surface (δ/ϕ = 0 and δ = 0) 15

Figure C.2.3 Coefficients K p of effective passive earth pressure (horizontal component): with inclined retained surface (δ/ϕ = 0,66) 16

Figure C.2.4 Coefficients K p of effective passive earth pressure (horizontal component): with inclined retained surface (δ/ϕ = 1) 17

C.2 Analytical procedure for obtaining limiting active and passive earth pressures (1) The following procedure, which includes certain approximations, may be used in all cases. (2) The procedure is stated for passive pressures with the strength parameters (represented in the following by ϕ, c, δ, a) inserted as positive values, see Figure C.3. (3) For active pressures the same algorithm is used, with the following changes: the strength parameters ϕ, c, δ and a are inserted as negative values; the value of the angle of incidence of the equivalent surface load β 0 is β, mainly because of the approximations used for K γ. (4) The following symbols are used (some are also given in 1.6): a c K c K n K q K γ m t m w β δ ϕ θ ν q p is the adhesion between wall and ground is the cohesion is the coefficient for cohesion is the coefficient for normal loading on the surface is the coefficient for vertical loading is the coefficient for the soil weight is the angle from the soil surface direction, pointing away from the wall, to the tangent direction of the intersecting slip line that bounds the moving soil mass, pointing out from the soil surface is the angle from the wall normal to the tangent direction at the wall of the exterior slip line, positive when the tangent points upwards behind the wall is the angle from the horizontal to the soil surface direction, positive when the soil surface rises away from the wall is the angle of wall friction, with sign convention as defined in Figure C.4 when computing passive resistance is the angle of shearing resistance is the angle between the vertical and the wall direction, positive when the soil overhangs the wall is the tangent rotation along the exterior slip line, positive when the soil mass above this slip line is of a convex shape is the general uniform surcharge pressure, per unit area of the actual surface is the vertical uniform surcharge pressure, per unit area in a horizontal projection 18

Figure C.3 Definitions concerning wall and backfill inclination, surcharges and slipline geometry (5) The interface parameters δ and a must be chosen so that: a = c tanδ tanϕ (6) The boundary condition at the soil surface involves β 0, which is the angle of incidence of an equivalent surface load. With this concept the angle is defined from the vectorial sum of two terms: - actual distributed surface loading q, per unit of surface area, uniform but not necessarily vertical, and; - c cotϕ acting as normal load. The angle β 0 is positive when the tangential component of q points toward the wall while the normal component is directed toward the soil. If c = 0 while the surface load is vertical or zero, and for active pressures generally, β 0 = β. (7) The angle m t is determined by the boundary condition at the soil surface: cos sinβ 0 m t 0 = (C.3) sinϕ ( 2 + ϕ + β ) (8) The boundary condition at the wall determines m w by: sinδ cos ( 2m w + ϕ + δ ) = (C.4) sinϕ The angle m w is negative for passive pressures (ϕ > 0) if the ratio sin δ /sin ϕ is sufficiently large. (9) The total tangent rotation along the exterior slip line of the moving soil mass, is determined by the angle v to be computed by the expression: 19

v = m t + β mw θ (C.5) (10) The coefficient K n for normal loading on the surface (i.e. the normal earth pressure on the wall from a unit pressure normal to the surface) is then determined by the following expression in which v is to be inserted in radians: ( 2m + ϕ) 1+ sinϕ sin K w n = exp ( 2ν tanϕ) (C.6) 1 sinϕ sin( 2m t + ϕ) (11) The coefficient for a vertical loading on the surface (force per unit of horizontal area projection), is: 2 K q = K n cos β (C.7) and the coefficient for the cohesion term is: ( 1) cotϕ K c = Kn (C.8) (12) For the soil weight an approximate expression is: K γ ( β θ) = Kn cosβ cos (C.9) This expression is on the safe side. While the error is unimportant for active pressures it may be considerable for passive pressures with positive values of β. For ϕ = 0 the following limit values are found: p cos2m t = sinβ cosβ; c a cos2mw = ; c Kq 2 = cos β ; Kc = 2ν + sin2m t + sin2mw ; (with ν in radians), while for K γ (ϕ = 0), a better approximation is: sinβ cosmw K γ = cosθ + (C.10) sinm t (13) Both for passive and active pressures, the procedure assumes the angle of convexity to be positive (ν 0). (14) If this condition is not (even approximately) fulfilled, e.g. for a smooth wall and a sufficiently sloping soil surface when β and φ have opposite signs, it may be necessary to consider using other methods. This may also be the case when irregular surface loads are considered. 20

C.3 Movements to mobilise earth pressures (1) The relationship of earth pressures to wall movement should be considered for active situations. The magnitude of this movement depends on the mode of wall movement, the initial earth pressures and the density of the soil. Table C.1 gives approximate values for the ratio v a /h for fully mobilised effective active earth pressure for a vertical wall with drained, non-cohesive soil and a horizontal ground surface, assuming an initial stress state with K o <1. (2) The relationship of earth pressures to wall movement should be considered for passive situations. The magnitude of this movement depends on the mode of wall movement, the initial earth pressures and the density of the soil. Table C.2 gives approximate values for the ratio v p /h for fully mobilised effective passive earth pressure for a vertical wall with drained, non-cohesive soil and a horizontal ground surface, assuming an initial stress state with K o <1. Values in brackets are the v/h ratios for half the limiting value of the effective passive earth pressure. (3) Intermediate values of effective active earth pressure between the rest state and the limit state may be obtained by linear interpolation. (4) For passive situations, values may be interpolated from those given in Table C.2 using a curve of the general form shown in Figure C.4. 21

Table C.1 Ratios v a /h for non-cohesive soils Kind of wall movement v a /h loose soil % v a /h dense soil % a) 0,4 to 0,5 0,1 to 0,2 b) 0,2 0,05 to 0,1 c) 0,8 to 1,0 0,2 to 0,5 d) 0,4 to 0,5 0,1 to 0,2 where: v a h is the wall motion to mobilise active earth pressure is the height of the wall 22

Table C.2 Ratios v p /h and v/h for 0.5σ p for non-cohesive soils Mode wall movement of v p /h (v/h for 0.5σ p ) % v p /h (v/h for 0.5σ p ) % loose soil dense soil a) 7 (1,5) to 25 (4,0) 5 (1,1) to 10 (2,0) b) 5 (0,9) to 10 (1,5) 3 (0,5) to 6 (1,0) c) 6 (1,0) to 15 (1,5) 5 (0,5) to 6 (1,3) where: v is the wall displacement v p h is the wall displacement to mobilise passive earth pressure is the height of the wall σ p is fully mobilised passive earth pressure 23

Key 1 values taken from Table C.2 2 not to scale Figure C.4 Mobilisation of effective passive earth pressure of non-cohesive soil versus normalised wall displacement v/v p (v: displacement; v p : displacement for the full mobilisation of passive earth pressure) 24