The impacts of Open Government initiatives on SDIs Martin Seiler Coordination Office SDI Germany INSPIRE Conference 2013 Florence, 27 June 2013
Outline (Open) Government in Germany GDI-DE-architecture govdata.de architecture Providing geospatial metadata to govdata.de Conclusion & Outlook
Administrative structure federation 16 federal states ( Bundesländer ) GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2013
Administrative structure federation 16 federal states ( Bundesländer ) ~ 12.000 municipalities GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2013
Administrative structure federation 16 federal states ( Bundesländer ) ~ 12.000 municipalities They all own data! GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2013
Open Government Common Drivers: public discourse about transparency in politics revision of PSI directive governmental data as public good economic potential through innovation
Open Government But diverse: laws cultures mindsets implementations GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2013
What is open data? Open Knowledge Foundation: defines 11 criteria: http://opendefinition.org/okd / (e.g. access/technological restriction, reuse/attribution, integrity, details about licenses, statements regarding discrimination, )
What is open data? Open Knowledge Foundation: defines 11 criteria: http://opendefinition.org/okd / (e.g. access/technological restriction, reuse/attribution, integrity, details about licenses, statements regarding discrimination, ) govdata.de is less demanding clear license statement license considered open data available for download data available in a machine readable format
SDI architecture
SDI architecture
SDI architecture
SDI architecture > 30 Discovery Services connected
Govdata.de portal on federal level nation-wide, harmonized access to open data search and access through a single website harmonized categories, metadata prototype online since 03/2013 large share of data in administrations is spatial data!
Govdata.de portal on federal level nation-wide, harmonized access to open data search and access through a single website harmonized categories, metadata prototype online since 03/2013 large share of data in administrations is spatial data! We have an application for your SDI!!
Govdata.de
Govdata.de architecture Source: Marienfeld (2012)
Govdata.de architecture Source: Marienfeld (2012)
GDI-DE vs. govdata.de GDI-DE Govdata.de Interface ISO AP CKAN-APIs Format XML JSON Data model ISO 19115 CKAN-Profil Complexity high low Standard license no yes
GDI-DE vs. govdata.de GDI-DE Govdata.de Interface ISO AP CKAN-APIs Format XML JSON Data model ISO 19115 CKAN-Profile Complexity high low Standard license no yes
Challenges identifying open data in the central
Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts
Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts
Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling
Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use
Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use additional agreements on metadata in GDI-DE
Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use additional agreements on metadata in GDI-DE Keyword:
Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use additional agreements on metadata in GDI-DE {name: Name of License URL: http://www.licenseurl Attribution: Attribution Text }
Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use additional agreements on metadata in GDI-DE resolve data-service coupling
Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use additional agreements on metadata in GDI-DE resolve data-service coupling json export
Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use promote common licenses keeping the infrastructures in sync identification of resources
Challenges GDI-DE central local
Challenges GDI-DE central local (local, regional, thematic)
Challenges GDI-DE central (central) ISO 19139 local (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges GDI-DE central (central) ISO 19139 local (local, regional, thematic) (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges GDI-DE central (central) ISO 19139 local (local, regional, thematic) (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges GDI-DE central (central) ISO 19139 local (local, regional, thematic) ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges GDI-DE central (central) Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 local (local, regional, thematic) ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges GDI-DE central (central) Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges GDI-DE central (central) Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges GDI-DE central (central) ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges GDI-DE Transformation A: central (central) ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) Transformation A!= Transformation B ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) Transformation B: ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges GDI-DE Transformation A: central (central) ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) Transformation A!= Transformation B ISO 19139 CKAN - Duplicates? - Priorities? local (local, regional, thematic) Transformation B: ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges SDI Europe central (central) Transformation A: ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) Transformation B: ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges SDI Europe (INSPIRE) ISO 19139 CKAN DCAT central (central) Transformation A: ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) Transformation B: ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Challenges SDI Transformation C: Europe (INSPIRE) ISO 19139 ISO 19139 DCAT Transformation D: CKAN DCAT central (central) Transformation A: ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) Transformation B: ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited
Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others
Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity
Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users
Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up
Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up high quality metadata is crucial (automatisms, editors)
Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up high quality metadata is crucial (automatisms, editors) INSPIRE metadata IR/TG need improvement
Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up high quality metadata is crucial (automatisms, editors) INSPIRE metadata IR/TG need improvement clear license statements are essential
Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up high quality metadata is crucial (automatisms, editors) INSPIRE metadata IR/TG need improvement clear license statements are essential centralized architecture is adjusting slowly
Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up high quality metadata is crucial (automatisms, editors) INSPIRE metadata IR/TG need improvement clear license statements are essential centralized architecture is adjusting slowly is a challenge and a chance
Thank you Questions? martin.seiler@bkg.bund.de