The impacts of Open Government initiatives on SDIs

Similar documents
Connecting SDI to an Open Data Portal The German Technical Adapter

Implementing the Smart Growth Priority in an Open and Interoperable System for Geographic Data: Sardinia SITR- IDT

EXPECTATIONS OF TURKISH ENVIRONMENTAL SECTOR FROM INSPIRE

INSPIRE - A Legal framework for environmental and land administration data in Europe

OPEN GOVERNMENT - BENEFITS OF INSPIRE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

INSPIREd solutions for Air Quality problems Alexander Kotsev

INSPIRE Coordination in Germany

Ready for INSPIRE.... connecting worlds. European SDI Service Center

ArcGIS for INSPIRE. Marten Hogeweg

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Netherlands

Spatial data interoperability and INSPIRE compliance the platform approach BAGIS

Spatial Data Infrastructure Concepts and Components. Douglas Nebert U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee Secretariat

CLICK HERE TO KNOW MORE

E-Government and SDI in Bavaria, Germany

Discovery and Access of Geospatial Resources using the Geoportal Extension. Marten Hogeweg Geoportal Extension Product Manager

SDI-Challenges European perspective

NAG-City Expert Workshop Oslo 8-9. October 2012 SOSI standards and mapping for Europe (INSPIRE)

INSPIRE Basics. Vlado Cetl European Commission Joint Research Centre.

ESBN. Working Group on INSPIRE

ISO Series Standards in a Model Driven Architecture for Landmanagement. Jürgen Ebbinghaus, AED-SICAD

Implementation of INSPIRE Principles: Sardinia Region SDI State of the Art and Further Developments

Major Opportunities in Spatial Data Infrastructure Communities

Technical Specifications. Form of the standard

SITR-IDT The Spatial Data Infrastructure of Sardinia Region

Providing Marine Data. The German Marine Data Infrastructure (MDI-DE) as an example for best practice

Geospatial Information Management, a Feasible Tool for Small Island Developing States?

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the Community

The Process of Spatial Data Harmonization in Italy. Geom. Paola Ronzino

INSPIRE as a Powerful Tool for Managing and Opening Environmental Data

Marine Spatial Planning, a Norwegian user case NSHC33

Bentley Map Advancing GIS for the World s Infrastructure

Establishing the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) for Norway a joint effort by many stakeholders SPATIAL DATA FOR BENEFIT OF THE SOCIETY

INSPIRE Data Harmonization and Network Services at the German Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG) Klaus Fretter BfG Sören Dupke con terra

NOKIS - Information Infrastructure for the North and Baltic Sea

Paper UC1351. Conference: User Conference Date: 08/10/2006 Time: 8:30am-9:45am Room: Room 23-B (SDCC)

The European Location Framework (ELF) Project One Source for Reference Geo-Information for Europe

ArcGIS for INSPIRE. Marten Hogeweg Satish Sankaran

Standards in Action: The Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure (CGDI)

Institute of Statistical and Geographical Information of Jalisco State Subnational Statistical and Geographical System India.

INSPIRE and egovernment policies: a common governance for a wider public sector information infrastructure

Open spatial data infrastructure

EuroGEOSS for Drought - Linking the European Drought Observatory to global and local scales

Governance and performance of open spatial data policies in the context of INSPIRE

Metadata for Supporting Spatial Data on the Web. Marten Hogeweg & Satish Sankaran

The future of SDIs. Ian Masser

Agenda. Status of GI activities. NGII Framework. SDI from the national policy perspective

Spatial Information Management in the Context of Organizational Development the Approach in North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany

Finding geodata that otherwise would have been forgotten GeoXchange a portal for free geodata

Solving the European Data Puzzle Simplifying INSPIRE Challenges and Usage. con terra GmbH Dipl.-Ing. Mark Döring

Administrative Maps 1 : VK2500

Spatial Data Availability Energizes Florida s Citizens

Innovation in Land Management: Integrated Solutions For National Cadastre Projects

INSPIRE Shared Service

The state-of-the-art of the Finnish SDI. Arctic SDI WG Meeting

An analysis of Agile conferences papers: a snapshot of the GI&GIS research in Europe

Open Data meets Big Data

IRDAT Fvg, evolving a regional Spatial Data Infrastructure according to INSPIRE

Global Geospatial Information Management Country Report Finland. Submitted by Director General Jarmo Ratia, National Land Survey

Economic and Social Council 2 July 2015

Sustainable and Harmonised Development for Smart Cities The Role of Geospatial Reference Data. Peter Creuzer

STATE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DATABASE

Implementing INSPIRE in Sweden

Implementation of Inspire in Denmark - How we get it flying! Olav Eggers National Survey & Cadastre -Denmark

INSPIRE and Land Use Planning System in Portugal

Innovation. The Push and Pull at ESRI. September Kevin Daugherty Cadastral/Land Records Industry Solutions Manager

ESDIN Results from a Crossborder INSPIRE Preparatory Project. Jörgen Hartnor, Lantmäteriet.

NOKIS an ISO Based Metadata System

Zagreb Spatial Data Infrastructure. Sanja Batić, APIS IT Split, 14. rujna 2011.

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Czech Republic

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Denmark

Copernicus Data Driven Services for Regional & Local Government in Greece

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Malta

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Finland

Paloma Abad LÓPEZ, Emilio; SÁNCHEZ, Alejandra; RODRÍGUEZ, Antonio F; SOTERES, Carolina. September 17

INSPIRing effort. Peter Parslow Ordnance Survey December Various European approaches to managing an SDI

Regione Umbria. ESRI EMEA User Conference 2010 Rome, October 27th 2010

ELF products in the ArcGIS platform

The EOC Geoservice: Standardized Access to Earth Observation Data Sets and Value Added Products

Evaluating Sustainability of the Georesources Observation System

INSPIRE at local and municipal level in the state of Hesse (Germany) - acceptance and challenges -

The INSPIRE Community Geoportal

EuroGeographics & INSPIRE. Nick Land, Executive Director of EuroGeographics

SPATIALIST: Describing and Analysing the current SDI-status in Flanders (Belgium)

MedIsolae-3D. Mediterranean Islands SDI and 3D Aerial Web Navigation. Giacomo Martirano. (Epsilon Italia)

Developing a Spatial Data Infrastructure for Cultural Heritage

CHAPTER 22 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Portals: Standards in Action

ArcGIS Enterprise: Administration Workflows STUDENT EDITION

The German GDI a public-private cooperation project. Heinz BRÜGGEMANN Surveying and Mapping Agency NRW, Germany

Appropriation Directions for 2007

Marine Spatial Management Tool

Pal NIKOLLI Bashkim IDRIZI Ismail KABASHI Adelajda HALILI THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE IN ALBANIA

GTK GeoKernel and Data Management. Material from Niina Ahtonen, Esa Kauniskangas and Tero Rönkkö

The FIG - Questionnaire on NSDI

INSPIRE implementation in the Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization Producing and Publishing Environmental Data

USEPA's Comprehensive Geospatial Information Sharing Framework

FINNISH LINKED DATA PILOTS

INSPIRE implementation in Portugal: the operational approach

Upgrade the Datasets in NSDI for Smarter Services with the Cases of China

Norwegian spatial data infrastructure supporting disaster risk management Norwegian Mapping Authority

Transcription:

The impacts of Open Government initiatives on SDIs Martin Seiler Coordination Office SDI Germany INSPIRE Conference 2013 Florence, 27 June 2013

Outline (Open) Government in Germany GDI-DE-architecture govdata.de architecture Providing geospatial metadata to govdata.de Conclusion & Outlook

Administrative structure federation 16 federal states ( Bundesländer ) GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2013

Administrative structure federation 16 federal states ( Bundesländer ) ~ 12.000 municipalities GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2013

Administrative structure federation 16 federal states ( Bundesländer ) ~ 12.000 municipalities They all own data! GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2013

Open Government Common Drivers: public discourse about transparency in politics revision of PSI directive governmental data as public good economic potential through innovation

Open Government But diverse: laws cultures mindsets implementations GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2013

What is open data? Open Knowledge Foundation: defines 11 criteria: http://opendefinition.org/okd / (e.g. access/technological restriction, reuse/attribution, integrity, details about licenses, statements regarding discrimination, )

What is open data? Open Knowledge Foundation: defines 11 criteria: http://opendefinition.org/okd / (e.g. access/technological restriction, reuse/attribution, integrity, details about licenses, statements regarding discrimination, ) govdata.de is less demanding clear license statement license considered open data available for download data available in a machine readable format

SDI architecture

SDI architecture

SDI architecture

SDI architecture > 30 Discovery Services connected

Govdata.de portal on federal level nation-wide, harmonized access to open data search and access through a single website harmonized categories, metadata prototype online since 03/2013 large share of data in administrations is spatial data!

Govdata.de portal on federal level nation-wide, harmonized access to open data search and access through a single website harmonized categories, metadata prototype online since 03/2013 large share of data in administrations is spatial data! We have an application for your SDI!!

Govdata.de

Govdata.de architecture Source: Marienfeld (2012)

Govdata.de architecture Source: Marienfeld (2012)

GDI-DE vs. govdata.de GDI-DE Govdata.de Interface ISO AP CKAN-APIs Format XML JSON Data model ISO 19115 CKAN-Profil Complexity high low Standard license no yes

GDI-DE vs. govdata.de GDI-DE Govdata.de Interface ISO AP CKAN-APIs Format XML JSON Data model ISO 19115 CKAN-Profile Complexity high low Standard license no yes

Challenges identifying open data in the central

Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts

Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts

Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling

Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use

Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use additional agreements on metadata in GDI-DE

Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use additional agreements on metadata in GDI-DE Keyword:

Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use additional agreements on metadata in GDI-DE {name: Name of License URL: http://www.licenseurl Attribution: Attribution Text }

Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use additional agreements on metadata in GDI-DE resolve data-service coupling

Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use additional agreements on metadata in GDI-DE resolve data-service coupling json export

Challenges identifying open data in the central mapping ISO 19115 to CKAN-Profile, e.g. Point of Contacts Data Service Coupling Restrictions on access and use promote common licenses keeping the infrastructures in sync identification of resources

Challenges GDI-DE central local

Challenges GDI-DE central local (local, regional, thematic)

Challenges GDI-DE central (central) ISO 19139 local (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges GDI-DE central (central) ISO 19139 local (local, regional, thematic) (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges GDI-DE central (central) ISO 19139 local (local, regional, thematic) (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges GDI-DE central (central) ISO 19139 local (local, regional, thematic) ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges GDI-DE central (central) Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 local (local, regional, thematic) ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges GDI-DE central (central) Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges GDI-DE central (central) Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges GDI-DE central (central) ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges GDI-DE Transformation A: central (central) ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) Transformation A!= Transformation B ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) Transformation B: ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges GDI-DE Transformation A: central (central) ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) Transformation A!= Transformation B ISO 19139 CKAN - Duplicates? - Priorities? local (local, regional, thematic) Transformation B: ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges SDI Europe central (central) Transformation A: ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) Transformation B: ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges SDI Europe (INSPIRE) ISO 19139 CKAN DCAT central (central) Transformation A: ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) Transformation B: ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Challenges SDI Transformation C: Europe (INSPIRE) ISO 19139 ISO 19139 DCAT Transformation D: CKAN DCAT central (central) Transformation A: ISO 19139 CKAN Govdata.de (central) ISO 19139 CKAN local (local, regional, thematic) Transformation B: ISO 19139 CKAN (local, regional, thematic) Source: Weichand (2013), edited

Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others

Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity

Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users

Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up

Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up high quality metadata is crucial (automatisms, editors)

Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up high quality metadata is crucial (automatisms, editors) INSPIRE metadata IR/TG need improvement

Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up high quality metadata is crucial (automatisms, editors) INSPIRE metadata IR/TG need improvement clear license statements are essential

Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up high quality metadata is crucial (automatisms, editors) INSPIRE metadata IR/TG need improvement clear license statements are essential centralized architecture is adjusting slowly

Conclusion lessons learned about usefulness of the infrastructure for others reduce complexity care about requirements of potential/new users open up high quality metadata is crucial (automatisms, editors) INSPIRE metadata IR/TG need improvement clear license statements are essential centralized architecture is adjusting slowly is a challenge and a chance

Thank you Questions? martin.seiler@bkg.bund.de