BepiColombo MPO Science Operations Planning Drivers IWPSS-2013

Similar documents
Planning Drivers for the BepiColombo MPO Science Payload Operations

BepiColombo Mission to Mercury - コロンボ. October Jan van Casteren, Mauro Novara.

BepiColombo Mission to Mercury

BepiColombo Project Status. Presentation for MESSENGER Science Team Meeting Via-Skype, 27 th March 2015

Seminar BELA STAR SIMULATOR

Spectroscopy for planetary upper atmospheres きょくたん

BepiColombo Venus flyby Science Operations Feasibility Analysis

ESA UNCLASSIFIED For Official Use. BepiColombo à Exploring Mercury

Mercury radio science experiment of the mission BepiColombo

An Overview of BepiColombo Thermal Analysis

BepiColombo. Project and MPO Status. Comprehensive Explora1on of Planet Mercury

Europe to the Moon. BHF 10 Feb 2005 SPC

SP-1291 June Mars Express. The Scientific Investigations

Science planning and operations for Mars Express

BepiColombo SWT # October 2017, Matera

ESA s Juice: Mission Summary and Fact Sheet

A. Milillo, (INAF/Institute of Space Astrophysics and Planetology)

SciBox, a Proven Automated Planning and Commanding System

Robotic Lunar Exploration Scenario JAXA Plan

Feasible Mission Designs for Solar Probe Plus to Launch in 2015, 2016, 2017, or November 19, 2008

Venus Express: Results, Status and Future Plans

Geant4 in JAXA. Masanobu Ozaki (JAXA/ISAS)

MORE: the radio science experiment of the mission BepiColombo to Mercury. L. Iess Università La Sapienza

Appendix C. Mercury Retro-Reflection Modelling and Effects on MPO Solar Array. Anja Frey Giulio Tonellotto (ESA/ESTEC, The Netherlands)

Juno Status and Earth Flyby Plans. C. J. Hansen

IAC-09.A3.2A.2 KAGUYA MISSION SUMMARY. S. Sasaki, M.Kato, H.Maejima, S.Sobue, and SELENE Project Team. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)

A BATCH-SEQUENTIAL FILTER FOR THE BEPICOLOMBO RADIO SCIENCE EXPERIMENT

SOLAR FURNACE. By Heiko Ritter JOURNEY TO THE INNER

Science Scenario Modeling

New Worlds Observer Operations Concept NEW WORLDS OBSERVER OPERATIONS CONCEPT (OPSCON)

Stas Barabash 1 Yoshifumi Futaana 1 and the SELMA Team. Swedish Institute of Space Physics Kiruna, Sweden. DAP, Boulder, January, 2017

China s Chang E Program

JUICE/Laplace Mission Summary & Status

Symposium on Planetary Science 2013 Magnetosphere of Mercury - Science Target for BepiColombo -

ASTEROID IMPACT MISSION: AIM3P MISSION AND PAYLOAD OPERATIONS SCENARIO

Solution for Homework# 3. Chapter 5 : Review & Discussion

Angelika Dehn Rob Koopman 10 Years GOME on ERS-2 Workshop

Overview of the Current Baseline of the Solar-C Spacecraft System

AIM RS: Radio Science Investigation with AIM

Europe-Japan Space Science Collaboration. Saku Tsuneta Institute of Space and Astronautical Science Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

Scott Bolton OPAG February 1, 2016

Upgraded Program of Russian Lunar Landers: Studying of Lunar Poles

MERCURY S ATMOSPHERE. F. Leblanc

VENUS EXPRESS. The First European Mission to Venus. Gerhard Schwehm and Hakan Svedhem ESA/ESTEC

PLANET-C: Venus Climate Orbiter mission from Japan. Takeshi Imamura Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency PLANET-C team

Juno. Fran Bagenal University of Colorado

The Quantum Sensor Challenge Designing a System for a Space Mission. Astrid Heske European Space Agency The Netherlands

The radio science experiment with BepiColombo mission to Mercury

Telescopes and the Atmosphere

Mars Express

Mission Design Options for Solar-C Plan-A

DARE Mission and Spacecraft Overview

The ion mass spectrometer MSA onboard BepiColombo MMO

A Concept of Nanosatellite Small Fleet for Earth Observation

NASA Future Magnetospheric Missions. J. Slavin & T. Moore Laboratory for Solar & Space Physics NASA GSFC

PLANET-C: Venus Climate Orbiter mission -Updates- Takehiko Satoh (Kumamoto Univ / JAXA) George Hashimoto (Kobe Univ) PLANET-C team

Solar Orbiter. T.Appourchaux, L.Gizon and the SO / PHI team derived from M.Velli's and P.Kletzkine's presentations

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology. Juno Update

ILWS Italian SpaceAgency (ASI) Contribution

AST111, Lecture 1b. Measurements of bodies in the solar system (overview continued) Orbital elements

Testing General Relativity with Interplanetary Spacecraft

Overview of the Jovian Exploration Technology Reference Studies

Toward Venus orbit insertion of Akatsuki

Expanding Science with SmallSats/CubeSats

Radio Science Techniques for Solar System Tests of General Relativity

ASPECT Spectral Imager CubeSat Mission to Didymos

Orbiter Element Brian Cooke

Juno Update for OPAG. Steve Levin Juno Project Scien8st September 7, 2017

Asteroid Impact Mission (AIM)

James Carpenter, Lunar Lander Office, Directorate of Human Spaceflight and Operations

OSIRIS-REX OVERVIEW PRESENTATION TO THE PLANETARY SCIENCE SUBCOMMITTEE

ILWS Related Activities in Germany (Update) Prague, June 11-12, 2008

Chandrayaan Mission Objectives and future lunar programs

Plato, Euclid and the New Hard X-Ray mission

NASA: BACK TO THE MOON

Cosmic Vision : The scientific priorities for astrophysics and fundamental physics

Orbital Orbital Chara Char cte act ristics eristics of the Helios of the Helio sy s s s y te st m Orbit : Low: Sun-synchronous: Quasi-polar: Phased:

Progress of Solar Wind Magnetosphere Ionosphere Link Explorer (SMILE) Mission

IR sounder small satellite for polar orbit weather measurements

STATUS OF THE JUICE MISSION

Study Participants: T.E. Sarris, E.R. Talaat, A. Papayannis, P. Dietrich, M. Daly, X. Chu, J. Penson, A. Vouldis, V. Antakis, G.

Operational Aspects of Space Weather-Related Missions

Exploring the Mysteries of the Cosmos on the MOST Microsatellite Mission

LUNAR EXPLORATION EFFORTS By ISRO Chandrayaan-1 and Beyond

Substorms at Mercury: Old Questions and New Insights. Daniel N. Baker Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP)

The ESA scientific program

LADEE PDS Mission Description

Venus Gravity Assists Science Opportunity

PROBA 1. F. Teston ESA/ESTEC D/TEC-EL

Planetary ENA imaging:! where we are, where to go! Stas Barabash Swedish Institute of Space Physics Kiruna, Sweden

Flight S4-002 Status of Hayabusa2: Asteroid Sample Return Mission to C-type Asteroid Ryugu. Yuichi Tsuda, Makoto Yoshikawa (ISAS/JAXA)

Italian Lunar Science Studies and Possible Missions a.k.a. The Moon: an Italian Approach. Angioletta Coradini Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica

Appendix G. Solar Orbiter SPICE Thermal Design, Analysis and Testing. Samuel Tustain (RAL Space, United Kingdom)

S E C T I O N 8 T H E T O U R

SELENE TRANSLUNAR TRAJECTORY AND LUNAR ORBIT INJECTION

MAGNETISM QUIZ MAGNETISM

GOES-R Instrument Status and Accommodations. Barbara Pfarr GOES-R Program Systems Engineering January 2010 AMS Conference

Space Physics: Recent Advances and Near-term Challenge. Chi Wang. National Space Science Center, CAS

Mercury Transit & SWT # May 2016 ESAC, Madrid

ROSETTA. One Comet Rendezvous and two Asteroid Fly-bys. Rita Schulz Rosetta Project Scientist

Transcription:

BepiColombo MPO Science Operations Planning Drivers IWPSS-2013 Sara de la Fuente sfuente@sciops.esa.int BepiColombo MPO Science Ground Segment ESA, ESAC, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, 28691, Spain

Summary This presentation summarizes the main drivers for the BepiColombo MPO Science operations planning described in the paper. Those drivers are: 1. Science observations performed by the scientific instruments. 2. Operational constraints, like power constraints, data downlink constraints, and pointing constraints. 3. Mission characteristics, like mission duration, experiment characteristics and Orbit characteristics. VG 2

BepiColombo Mission overview BepiColombo is an interdisciplinary mission to Mercury scheduled for launch in 2015, arriving at Mercury in 2021. It is a joint mission between ESA and JAXA consisting of 2 complementary spacecraft: MPO and MMO. VG 3

BepiColombo MPO overview Mercury Planetary Orbiter (MPO) polar orbit optimized for study of the planet itself 400x1500 km 2.3 hours period Data volume ~1550Gbits/year Mainly nadir pointing Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter (MMO) polar orbit optimized for study of the magnetosphere 400x12000 km 9.2 hours period Data volume ~100Gbits/year VG 4

VG 5 BepiColombo MPO Configuration

BepiColombo MPO Scientific Payload Instrument Long Name Scientific Objective VG 6 BELA BepiColombo Laser Altimeter Mercury surface topographic mapping ISA Italian Spring Accelerometer Non-gravitational acceleration measurements of the spacecraft MERMAG Mercury Magnetometer Measurement of Mercury magnetic field, its source and interaction with solar wind MERTIS MGNS Mercury Thermal & Infra-red spectrometer Mercury Gamma-ray & Neutron Spectrometer Global mineralogical mapping, surface temperature and thermal inertia Elemental surface and sub-surface composition, volatile deposits on polar areas MIXS Mercury Imaging X-ray Spectrometer Elemental surface composition, global mapping and composition of surface areas MORE PHEBUS SERENA SIMBIO-SYS SIXS Mercury Orbiter Radio-science Experiment Probing of Hermean Exosphere by Ultraviolet Spectroscopy Search for Exospheric Refilling and Emitted Natural Abundances Spectrometers & Imagers for MPO BepiColombo - System SIXS Solar Intensity X-ray and Particle Spectrometer Core and mantle structure, Mercury orbit, fundamental science, gravity field UV spectral mapping of the exosphere In-Situ study of composition, vertical structure and source and sink process of the exosphere Optical high-resolution and stereo imaging. Near-IR imaging spectroscopy for global mineralogical mapping Monitor for solar X-ray intensity and solar particles in support of MIXS

Science Operations Planning Drivers: Science Observations The science observations will be defined in a Science Traceability Matrix (TMX). The TMX provides the link between the contribution of the different experiments observations to BepiColombo science goals. VG 7

Mission duration Nominal science mission duration: 12 months with the possibility of 12 months extension. Many observations depend on particular geometrical conditions and seasonal peaks in resource demands are expected. Aphelion is the most advantageous period for high resolution imaging when periherm is on the dayside. Availability of feasible opportunities needs to be considered when scheduling operations and resolving planning conflicts, in order to avoid missing opportunities. VG 8

MPO orbit Characteristics The MPO orbit is in an inertially fixed low-eccentricity orbit (400 x 1500 km) of 2.3-hour period. The MPO orbit is not maintained and several effects will have an impact on its evolution: Solar Radiation Pressure Albedo and Infrared radiation Wheel off loadings (2 every 24h) Safe-modes Mercury gravitational coef. J2&J3 The SGS planning process has to be able to address the issue of poor long-term orbit predictability and assume enough margins when scheduling science payload operations relative to events. VG 9

Science Operations Planning Drivers: Operational Constraints summary The following mission characteristics will drive the BepiColombo MPO Science operations planning: Power Data downlink Pointing Wheel off-loading Flip-over maneuvers Thermal VG 10

Power Constraints Due to high spacecraft temperatures at perihelion and aphelion, the thermal limitations of the solar arrays and eclipses, the power available for payload operations and Ka-band transmitter is expected to be limited during periods around perihelion and aphelion. VG 11

Pointing Constraints BepiColombo MPO is a considered a NADIR mission: the spacecraft has the +Z axis (experiments bore-sight) aligned with the nadir direction for a continuous observation of the planet. As MPO is specifically designed as a NADIR pointing spacecraft in a harsh thermal environment off pointing capabilities are limited. When an observation requires off-pointing attitude from nadir, it has to be checked: Pointing attitude compatibility with geometrical constraints (mainly coming from thermal constraints Compatibility with the rest of observations In case of incompatibility, it has to be evaluated: the priority of the observation if it is possible to reschedule it how many observations are affected VG 12

Wheel off-loading constraints Wheel off loadings frequency: two times every 24 hours Planned by the Science Ground segment MPO spacecraft orbit positions depending on Mercury true anomaly and the argument of periherm where wheel off loading shall not be schedule unless in eclipse (thruster failure during reaction wheels offloading can cause illumination of payload danger zone) VG 13

Thermal constraints Around perihelion season, interdependency thermal constraints between instruments have to be also considered, to avoid that switching one instrument overheats another one. Inter-experiment thermal issues at perihelion are currently under analysis. VG 14

Science Operations Planning Drivers: Mission Characteristics summary The following mission characteristics will drive the BepiColombo MPO Science operations planning: Mission duration Experiment characteristics Solid state mass memory characteristics Science data downlink mechanisms Two RF- bands for downlink MPO Orbit characteristics VG 15

VG 16 MPO Science Operational Timeline

SSMM characteristics SSMM total size: 384 Gbit (5 Gbit for Engineering stores, 16.8*2 Gbit for internal memory and 345 Gbit for Payload science stores) The telemetry science data packets are stored in the SSMM packet stores based on PIDs. One PID can only be associated to one SSMM packet store at a time, but several PIDs can be routed to the same SSMM packet store. The instruments will generate low- and/or highpriority science data and store it in different packet stores based on the PIDs VG 17

Two RF- bands for downlink X-band To return engineering data and high-priority science data. Downlink is done packet by packet it is possible to define a downlink priority of the packet stores. Engineering data is always given a higher priority than science data. Data return latency of this band is 1-2 days. Ka-band To return only low-priority science data It is affected by Earth weather conditions and therefore does not have the predictability of the X-band. Downlink is done using a dedicated file transfer downlink function/protocol. No priorities can be set for the File Transfer. Data return latency could be very high (more than 40 days). VG 18

Downlink Mechanisms Different mechanisms can be used to downlink science data in BepiColombo MPO: Nominal Downlink Flexible data downlink Re-routing of Ka-band stores to X-band Selective data downlink The Science Ground Segment will use these mechanisms to downlink the science data, taking into account: Full utilisation of X-band and Ka-band downlink capabilities SSMM does not overflow SSMM data stores have enough capacity High priority science data is downlinked to ground first. VG 19

Nominal Downlink Nominal Downlink refers to the downlink process that will be used by default in the science phase of the mission. Note: Stores highlighted in bold correspond to the default stores used nominally by the Payload Stores highlighted with dashes are stores that are not confirmed to be used Dark yellow stores are data stores suitable for re-routing to X-band VG 20

Flexible Downlink It will be ONLY used for HIGH PRIORITY DATA. An instrument VG 21 that nominally sends its data to a low priority Ka-band store can temporarily send its high priority data to the X-band store (using a different PID). The science data received via X- band can be used to make a quick scientific publication (i.e. interesting picture of Mercury) or to perform health checks of the science operations. Those checks will be performed using Quicklook tools on ground.

Re-routing of Ka-band stores to X-band There are some points in the mission where there is not enough science data to be dumped via X-band to fully utilize the X band bandwidth. In order to ensure that the X band bandwidth is fully utilized, there is the option to re-route a low-priority data store (which contains a significant amount of data) using the X-band. The re-routed stores are set to low priority and remain to be considered low priority science data. VG 22

Selective Data Downlink Instruments using this feature will generate and store low- and highpriority science data of the same observation The high-priority science data will be downlinked via the X-band The high-priority science data will be analysed on ground, together with other MPO instruments data and MMO data If the analysis indicates an interesting feature, a selection of the low-priority science data will be done via copy request to be downlinked via Ka-band VG 23

Conclusions BepiColombo MPO has the typical drivers of a planetary mission such as power, data volume, thermal and pointing constraints. Additionally it has some unique characteristics like a large SSMM which allows different downlink mechanisms and two different downlink channels. The science ground segment planning system will need to cope with those drivers and characteristics in order to efficiently plan the science payload operations. A specifically adapted science planning approach will be needed to ensure that all constraints and interdependencies are considered while balancing the available resources and maximizing the scientific return of the mission. VG 24

Authors Info Thanks! Authors Info: Sara de la Fuente, sfuente@sciops.esa.int Raymond Hoofs, rhoofs@sciops.esa.int Mauro Casale, Mauro.Casale@esa.int BepiColombo MPO Science Ground Segment ESA, ESAC, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, 28691, Spain VG 25