ENERGY OF A CHARGED WORMHOLE arxiv:gr-qc/0511030v2 22 Feb 2006 1. Introduction Mustafa Saltı and Oktay Aydogdu Department of Physics, Faculty of Art and Science, Middle East Technical University, 06531, Ankara-Turkey E-mails: musts6@yahoo.com, oktay231@yahoo.com Abstract. The Møller energy (due to matter and fields including gravity) distribution of the traversable Lorentzian wormhole space-time by the scalar field or electric charged is studied in two different approaches of gravity such as general relativity and teleparallel gravity. The results are found exactly the same in these different approximations. The energy found in teleparallel gravity is also independent of the teleparallel dimensionless coupling constant, which means that it is valid in any teleparallel model. Our results sustains that (a) the importance of the energy-momentum definitions in the evaluation of the energy distribution of a given space-time and (b) the viewpoint of Lessner that the Møller energy-momentum complex is a powerful concept of energy and momentum. Keywords: Energy; charged wormhole. PACs Numbers: 04.20.-q; 04.20.Jb; 04.50.+h. In literature, after Einstein s expression [1] for the energy and momentum distributions of the gravitational field, many attempts have been proposed to resolve the gravitational energy problem [2, 6]. Except for the definition of Møller, these definitions only give meaningful results if the calculations are performed in Cartesian coordinates. Møller constructed an expression which enables one to evaluate energy and momentum in any coordinate system. In general relativity, Virbhadra [3] using the energy and momentum complexes of Einstein, Landau-Lifshitz, Papapetrou and Weinberg for a general nonstatic spherically symmetric metric of the Kerr-Schild class, showed that all of these energy-momentum formulations give the same energy distribution as in the Penrose energy-momentum formulation. Further, several examples of particular space-times have been investigated and different energy-momentum complex are known to give the same energy distribution for a given space-time [4, 5]. The problem of energy-momentum localization has also been considered in alternative gravitation theory, namely teleparallel gravity [6]. In Gen. Relat. Gravit. 36, 1255(2004); Vargas, using the definitions of Einstein and Landau-Lifshitz in teleparallel To appear in Int. J. Theor. Phys.
Energy of a charged Wormhole 2 gravity, found that the total energy is zero in Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetimes and his result is the same as those calculated in general relativity [7]. After this interesting work, Saltı et.al. [8, 9] considered the viscous Kasner-type and the Bianchi-type I space-times, and the results obtained in teleparallel gravity are the same as obtained in general relativity. In another work, Aydogdu [10] shows that the energy distribution of the universe, based on the locally rotationally symmetric Bianchi-type II space-time, is the same both in teleparallel gravity and general relativity. In this paper, we obtain the energy distribution (due to matter plus fields) associated with a charged wormhole solution using the general relativity and the teleparallel gravity version of Møller s energy-momentum definition. Notations and conventions: c = h = 1, metric signature (+,,, ), Greek indices and Latin ones run from 0 to 3. Throughout this paper, Latin indices (i, j,...) represent the vector number, and Greek indices (µ, ν,...) represent the vector components. 2. The Traversable Wormhole Solutions A search for the traversable wormhole solutions with realistic matter has been for long, and is still remaining to be, one of the most intriguing challenges in gravitational studies. One of attractive features of wormholes is their ability to support electric or magnetic charge without charge [11] by letting the lines of force thread from one spatial asymptotic to another. As it is widely known, traversable wormhole can only exist with exotic matter sources, more precisely, if the energy-momentum tensor of the matter source of gravity violates the local and averaged null energy condition [12] T µν k µ k ν 0, k µ k ν = 0 (1) Scalar fields are able to provide good examples matter needed for wormholes: on the one hand, in many particular models they do exhibit exotic properties, on the other, many exact solutions are known for gravity with scalar sources. We will consider some examples of wormhole solutions. 2.1. The static wormhole The static wormhole space-time without and charge is given by [13] g µν dx µ dx ν = e 2Ξ(r) dt 2 + dr2 + r 2 (dθ 2 + sin 2 θdφ 2 ). (2) 1 ξ(r) r Here the arbitrary functions Ξ(r), ξ(r) are defined as the lapse and wormhole shape functions, respectively. The shape of the wormhole is determined by ξ(r). There can be two requirements about the wormhole function ξ(r) for the wormhole in order to be maintained. These are positiveness and flatness conditions. If r, ξ(r) approaches 2M that is defined as the mass of wormhole [14]. Therefore ξ(r) should be defined as the positive function, and the condition r > ξ(r) which means the existence of the minimum
Energy of a charged Wormhole 3 radius also support the positiveness of ξ(r). The other condition comes from the flareout condition of the shape of the wormhole. When the proper distance ζǫ(, + ) is defined as dζ = dr/(1 ξ(r)), the condition should be d 2 ζ dr 2 > 0 ξ rξ ξ 2 > 0. (3) 2.2. Wormhole with scalar field If we put ξ ef = ξ ρ/r instead of ξ with Ξ = 0, thus the effect by the scalar field on the wormhole is simply by represented as the change of the wormhole function ξ into ξ ρ/r without any interaction term. Here ρ depends on the changing rate of the scalar field ϕ and play the role of scalar charge. From this point of view, the metric of the wormhole space-time with the scalar field should be [13] g µν dx µ dx ν = dt 2 + dr 2 1 ξ(r) r + ρ r 2 + r 2 (dθ 2 + sin 2 θdφ 2 ). (4) Since the components are always positive, there is no horizon in this space-time. For the dimensional reasons, the wormhole function has the form given below. ξ = ξ 2ω/(2ω+1) 0 r 1/2ω+1 (5) where ω is the proper parameter of equation of state [15], and this should be less than 1 so that the exponent of r can be negative to satisfy the flareness condition. The 2 shape of the effective wormhole will vary with the value of this parameter and ρ via the additional factor ρ/r. 2.3. Wormhole with electric charge The procedures of the case of electric charge is the same as the case of scalar field. The space-time model for a wormhole with electric charge is given by [13] g µν dx µ dx ν = (1 Q ) dt 2 dr 2 + + r 2 (dθ 2 + sin 2 θdφ 2 ). (6) r 2 1 ξ(r) + Q r r 2 This line-element is the combination of Morris-Thorne type spherically symmetric static wormhole and Reissner-Nordström space-time. If Q = 0, the space-time model is reduced the Morris-Thorne wormhole and when ξ = 0, it transforms the Reissner- Nordström black hole with zero mass. 3. Møller s Energy-Momentum Definition 3.1. Energy in General Relativity In general relativity, the energy-momentum complex of Møller [2] is given by M ν µ = 1 8π Σνα µ,α (7)
Energy of a charged Wormhole 4 satisfying the local conservation laws: M ν µ x ν = 0 (8) where the antisymmetric super-potential Σ να µ is Σ να µ = g[g µβ,γ g µγ,β ]g νγ g αβ. (9) The locally conserved energy-momentum complex Mµ ν contains contributions from the matter, non-gravitational and gravitational fields. M0 0 is the energy density and M0 a are the momentum density components. The momentum four-vector of Møller is given by P µ = Mµ 0 dxdydz. (10) Using Gauss s theorem, this definition transforms into P µ = 1 Σ 0α µ 8π µ αds. (11) where µ α (where α = 1, 2, 3) is the outward unit normal vector over the infinitesimal surface element ds. P i give momentum components P 1, P 2, P 3 and P 0 gives the energy. 3.2. Energy in the Teleparallel Gravity The teleparallel theory of gravity (tetrad theory of gravitation) is an alternative approach to gravitation and corresponds to a gauge theory for the translation group based on Weitzenböck geometry [16]. In the theory of teleparallel gravity is attributed to torsion [17], which plays the role of a force [18], and the curvature tensor vanishes identically. The essential field is acted by a nontrivial tetrad field, which gives rise to the metric as a by-product. The translational gauge potentials appear as the nontrivial item of the tetrad field, so induces on space-time a teleparallel structure which is directly related to the presence of the gravitational field. The interesting place of teleparallel theory is that, due to its gauge structure, it can reveal a more appropriate approach to consider some specific problem. This is the situation, for example, in the energy and momentum problem, which becomes more transparent. Møller modified general relativity by constructing a new field theory in teleparallel space. The aim of this theory was to overcome the problem of the energy-momentum complex that appears in Riemannian Space [19]. The field equations in this new theory were derived from a Lagrangian which is not invariant under local tetrad rotation. Saez [20] generalized Møller theory into a scalar tetrad theory of gravitation. Meyer [21] showed that Møller theory is a special case of Poincare gauge theory [22, 23]. In teleparallel gravity, the super-potential of Møller is given by Mikhail et al. [6] as U νβ µ = ( g)1/2 2κ P τνβ χρσ [Φ ρ g σχ g µτ λg τµ γ χρσ (1 2λ)g τµ γ σρχ ] (12) where γ αβµ = h iα h i µ β;µ is the con-torsion tensor and h i is the tetrad field and defined uniquely by g αβ = h α i hβ j η ij (here η ij is the Minkowski space-time). κ is the Einstein constant and λ is free-dimensionless coupling parameter of teleparallel gravity. For the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity, there is a specific choice of this constant.
Energy of a charged Wormhole 5 Φ ρ is the basic vector field given by and P τνβ χρσ can be found by with g νβ ρσ Φ µ = γ ρ µρ (13) Pχρσ τνβ = δχg τ ρσ νβ + δρg τ σχ νβ δσg τ χσ νβ (14) being a tensor defined by g νβ ρσ = δν ρ δβ σ δν σ δβ ρ. (15) The energy-momentum density is defined by Π β α = Uβλ α,λ (16) where comma denotes ordinary differentiation. The energy is expressed by the surface integral; E = lim U 0ζ r 0 η ζ ds (17) r=constant where η ζ (with ζ = 1, 2, 3) is the unit three-vector normal to surface element ds. 4. Calculations In this part of the study, we will calculate the energy distribution (due to matter and fields including gravity) for a general metric that includes three wormhole models given above. The general line-element is 4.1. In Genaral Relativity g µν dx µ dx ν = B 2 dt 2 + A 2 dr 2 + R 2 (dθ 2 + sin 2 θdφ 2 ). (18) The matrix of the g µν is defined by B 2 0 0 0 0 A 2 0 0 0 0 R 2 (19) 0 0 0 0 R 2 sin 2 θ and its inverse g µν is B 2 0 0 0 0 A 2 0 0 0 0 1 0. (20) R 2 0 0 0 1 R 2 sin 2 θ For the line-element (18) under consideration we calculate Σ 01 0 = B rr 2 sin θ (21) AB which is the only required component of Σ να µ for our purpose. Here, the index r indicates derivative with respect to r. Using this expression in equation (23) we obtain the energy distribution E = B rr 2 2 (22) AB
Energy of a charged Wormhole 6 4.2. In Teleparallel Gravity The general form of the tetrad, h µ i, having spherical symmetry was given by Robertson [24]. In the Cartesian form it can be written as h 0 0 = ia, h0 a = Cxa, h α 0 = idxα, h α a = Bδα a + Exa x α + ǫ aαβ Fx β (23) where A, B, C, D, E, and F are functions of t and r = x a x a, and the zeroth vector h µ 0 has the factor i 2 = 1 to preserve Lorentz signature and the tetrad of Minkowski space-time is h µ a = diag(i, δα a ) where (a=1,2,3). Using the general coordinate transformation h aµ = Xν X µ h aν (24) where {X µ } and { X ν } are, respectively, the isotropic and Schwarzschild coordinates (t, r, θ, φ). In the spherical, static and isotropic coordinate system X 1 = r sin θ cosφ, X 2 = r sin θ sin φ, X 3 = r cosθ. We obtain the tetrad components as i 0 0 0 B 1 0 sin θ cosφ 1 sinφ cosθ cosφ A r r sin θ 1 0 sin θ sin φ 1 cosθ sin φ cos φ (25) A r r sinθ 1 0 cosθ A 1 sin θ 0 r where i 2 = 1. Hence, the required non-vanishing component of U νβ µ is [25, 26] U0 01 = B rr 2 sin θ κ (26) AB Substituting this result in energy integral, we have the following energy distribution E = B rr 2 2 AB. (27) This is the same energy distribution as obtained in general relativity. 4.3. Special cases for the energy In the previous two parts of this section, we obtained the general energy distribution in a wormhole solution with extra field such as scalar and electric fields. Now, we find the energy for some special cases given in section 2. The static wormhole, to get the limit of the general metric, we can write B = e 2Ξ(r) and A = r/(r ξ(r)) in the line-element (18). Therefore the energy distribution (due to matter and fields including gravity) in this case is obtained as E = r 3 2 (r ξ) 1 2 e Ξ Ξ r (28) For this line element, taking the limits of Ξ(r) 0 and ξ(r) 0, thus the model transforms into the Minkowski space-time, and the energy goes to zero.
Energy of a charged Wormhole 7 Wormhole with scalar field, to reduce our general metric into this case, we should write B = 1 and A = r 2 /(r 2 rξ(r) + ρ(r)) in the line-element (18). Using this expressions, the energy of this case is found as E = 0 (29) If we take the limits of ξ(r) 0 and ρ(r) 0, the model gives the Minkowski space-time, and the energy is also zero. Wormhole with electric charge, Taking B = (1 + Q2 ) and A = (1 ξ + Q2 ) 1 r 2 r r 2 into the line-element (18) we obtain the wormhole solution with electric charge. Considering these definitions, the energy is obtained as given below. E = Q r r2 rξ + Q 2 1 + r2 Q 2 1 2 This model also includes the Minkowski space-time, under the limits of Q 0 and ξ(r) 0, and the energy distribution of the model vanishes. 5. Discussions We evaluated the energy distributions for some wormhole solutions with extra fields such as scalar field and electric charge using both the general relativity and the teleparallel gravity versions of Møller s energy-momentum definition. The energy distributions were found the same in both of these different approximations of gravity. The energy distribution obtained in teleparallel gravity is also independent of the teleparallel dimensionless coupling constant, which means that it is valid in any teleparallel model. We also taken some limits of the wormhole models considered to show they includes the Minkowski metric, and find the zero energy as we expect. Furthermore, this paper sustains (a) the importance of the energy-momentum definitions in the evaluation of the energy distribution of a given space-time, (b) the viewpoint of Lessner [27] that the Møller energy-momentum complex is a powerful concept of energy and momentum, (c) the opinion that different energy-momentum expressions definitions could give the same result in a given space-time and (d) the Møller energy-momentum definition allows to make calculations in any coordinate system. Acknowledgments We would like to thank Prof. K.S. Virbhadra for his comments and suggestions and The Turkish Scientific and Technical Research Council (Tübitak)-Feza Gürsey Institute, Istanbul, for the hospitality we received in summer terms of 2002-2005. The work of MS was supported by Tübitak. (30) References [1] A. Einstein, Sitzungsber. Preus. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 778 (1915), Addendum-ibid. 799 (1915)
Energy of a charged Wormhole 8 [2] L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, The Classical theory of fields (Pergamon Press, 4th Edition, Oxford, re-printed in 2002); P.G. Bergmann and R. Thomson, Phys. Rev. 89, 400 (1953); S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principle and Applications of General Theory of Relativity (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1972); A. Papapetrou, Proc. R. Irish. Acad. A52, 11 (1948); C. Møller, Ann. Phys. (NY) 4, 347 (1958); R.C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodinamics and Cosmology (Oxford Univ. Pres. London, P.227) (1934); A. Qadir and M. Sharif, Phys. Lett. A167, 331 (1992). [3] K.S. Virbhadra, Phys. Rev. D60, 104041 (1999). [4] K.S. Virbhadra, Phys. Rev. D41, 1086 (1990); Phys. Rev. D42, 2919 (1990); Phys. Lett. A157, 195 (1997); Pramana-J. Phys. 38, 31 (1992); Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12, 4831 (1997); A. Chamorro and K.S. Virbhadra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D5, 251 (1996); K.S. Virbhadra, D. Narasimha and S.M. Chitre, Astron. Astrophysics. 337, 1 (1998); K.S. Virbhadra and J.C. Parikh, Phys. Lett. B317, 312 (1993); K.S. Virbhadra, J. M. Aguirregabiria and A. Chamorro, Gen. Rel. Grav. 28, (1996) 1393. [5] I. Radinschi, Mod. Phys. Lett. A15, 2171 (2000); Fizika B9, 43 (2000); Chin. J. Phys. 42, 40 (2004); Fizika B14, 3 (2005); Mod. Phys. Lett. A17, 1159 (2002); U.V.T., Physics Series 42, 11 (2001); Ragab M. Gad, Astrophys. Space Sci. 295, 459 (2005); E.C. Vagenas, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A18, 5781 (2003); Int. J. Mod. Phys. A18, 5949 (2003); Mod. Phys. Lett. A19, 213 (2004); Int. J. Mod. Phys. D14, 573 (2005). [6] F.I. Mikhail, M.I. Wanas, A. Hindawi and E.I. Lashin, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 32, 1627 (1993); T. Vargas, Gen. Rel. and Grav. 36, 1255 (2004). [7] N. Rosen, Gen. Rel. Gravit. 26, 319 (1994); V.B. Johri, D. Kalligas, G.P. Singh and C.W.F. Everitt, Gen. Rel. Grav. 27, 323 (1995); N. Banerjee and S. Sen, Pramana J. Phys. 49, 609 (1997). [8] M. Saltı, Nuovo Cimento B120, 53 (2005), Astrophys. Space Sci. 299, 159 (2005); Mod. Phys. Lett. A20, 2175 (2005); Czech. J. Phys. 56, 177 (2006). [9] M. Saltı and A. Havare, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20, 2169 (2005); O. Aydogdu and M. Saltı, Astrophys. Space Sci. 299, 227 (2005); Prog. Theor. Phys. 115, 63 (2006). [10] O. Aydogdu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, to appear [gr-qc/0601070]. [11] L. Wheeler, Ann. Phys. 2, 604 (1957) [12] D. Hochberg and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D56, 4745 (1997) [13] S.-W. Kim and H. Lee, Phys. Rev. D63, 064014 (2001) [14] M. Visser, Lorentzian Wormhole (AIP, New York, 1995). [15] S.-W. Kim, Phys. Rev. D53, 6889 (1996) [16] R. Weitzenböck, Invariantten theorie (Gronningen: Noordhoff, 1923). [17] K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, Phys. Rev. D19, 3524 (1978). [18] V.V. de Andrade and J.G. Pereira, Phys. Rev. D56, 4689 (1997). [19] C. Møller, Mat. Fys. Medd. K. Vidensk. Selsk. 39, 13 (1978); 1, 10 (1961). [20] D. Saez, Phys. Rev. D27, 2839 (1983). [21] H. Meyer, Gen. Rel. Gravit. 14, 531 (1982). [22] K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64, 866 (1980); 65, 525 (1980). [23] F.W. Hehl, J. Nitsch and P. von der Heyde, in General Relativity and Gravitation, edited by A. Held (Plenum, New York) (1980). [24] H.P. Robertson, Ann. of Math. (Princeton) 33, 496 (1932). [25] Wolfram Research, Mathematica 5.0 (2003). [26] TCI Software Research, Scientific Workplace 3.0 (1998). [27] G. Lessner, Gen. Relativ. Gravit 28, 527 (1996).